fundamental degradation terminology

20
Fundamental Degradation Terminology NREM 612 Structur e Function Init ial stat e Degr . stat e low hig h low hig h

Upload: iona

Post on 11-Jan-2016

27 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Fundamental Degradation Terminology. NREM 612. high. Initial state. Function. Degr. state. low. low. high. Structure. I. Ecosystem Stability. Ecosystem stability is primarily a function of: Sensitivity & Resilience to change. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Fundamental Degradation Terminology

Fundamental Degradation Terminology

NREM 612

StructureF

unct

ion

Initial state

Degr. state

low highlo

whi

gh

Page 2: Fundamental Degradation Terminology

2

I. Ecosystem Stability

Ecosystem stability is primarily a function of:Sensitivity & Resilience

to change.

A. Sensitivity – defined as (in Barrow 1991) “the degree to which a given environment undergoes change due to natural forces, human action, or a combination of both.”

B. Resilience – defined as (in Barrow 1991) “ the way in which the ecosystem can withstand use.”

C. Matrix of sensitivity and resilience can form the basis for land classification (Blaikie & Brookfield 1987)

Page 3: Fundamental Degradation Terminology

3

SensitivityResilience High Low

High

Low

SensitivityResilience High Low

High easy to degradeeasy to restore

Low

Think of ecosystems that would fit into each quadrat the matrix?

With a partner, fill in the tables below

hard to degradeeasy to restore

easy to degradehard to restore

hard to degradehard to restore

Sensitivity & Resilience Matrix

Page 4: Fundamental Degradation Terminology

4

SensitivityResilience High Low

High Mangrove Tidal salt marsh

Temperate forest

Low Tropical rain forestDry forestCoral reef

Herbaceous wetlandRangeland

Page 5: Fundamental Degradation Terminology

5

Stability Terminology

II. Stability terminology

A. General1. Constancy: lack of variation in some property of a system, ability of pop. to preserve its #s

2. Persistence: survival time of a system or come component of a system

Page 6: Fundamental Degradation Terminology

6

B. Terms to evaluate response to disturbance:

1. Resistance: ability to resist displacement from initial state, syn. w/ inertia

2. Resilience: ability to recover to an initial state after disturbance

3. Elasticity: speed of recovery to initial state after disturbance

4. Hysteresis: path of recovery differs from path of degradation (process or time)

5. Malleability: degree to which post-disturbance state differs from initial state

Illustrate terms in figure below:

StructureF

unct

ion

Initial state

Degr. state

new. state

low high

low

high

Stability Terminology, con’t

Page 7: Fundamental Degradation Terminology

7

II. Succession1. From Barrow 1991: “An ecosystem returns to a climax state via a series of successional stages – which are equilibrium points reached after disturbance

A. Primary succession – establishment of plants and an

ecosystem on land not previously vegetated

“from scratch”

B. Secondary succession – recolonization of previously

vegetated land following disturbance, soil remains

intact

Page 8: Fundamental Degradation Terminology

8

2. r-selected species: early-successional, adapted to disturbance, good dispersal capabilities, large #s of offspring, generalist, shorter lifespan

3. k-selected species: later-successional, better competitors, smaller # of offspring w/ higher survival rates, specialist, longer lifespan

Succession, con’t

Page 9: Fundamental Degradation Terminology

9

4. Facilitation: early successional spp. alter env. to make it more favorable for estab. of later-successional spp.

5. Inhibition: early successional spp. alter env. to make it less favorable to estab. of later-successional spp.

6. Tolerance: early spp. neither help nor hinder later spp.

Succession, con’t

StructureF

unct

ion

Initial state

Degr. state

new. state

low high

low

high

Page 10: Fundamental Degradation Terminology

10

Relationship between stability and diversityAre diverse systems more stable than simple systems?

Pimm et al. (1995)?

III. Stability-Diversity Relationship

A. Species Richness: # of different species in a particular area

B. Evenness: relative abundance of each species represented in a particular area

Page 11: Fundamental Degradation Terminology

11

Q: Which site has greater evenness?

Site 1 Site 2

Q: What is the species richness (SR) for site 1 & site 2?

SR for site 1 & 2 = 4

Site 1 = high Site 2 = low

Q: Which site do you consider more diverse?

Site 1

Page 12: Fundamental Degradation Terminology

12

C. Diversity: not just richness or abundance, but relationship between richness & abundance

Define these terms quantitatively:

s = # of species

Pi = proportion of individuals belonging to ith species

Diversity

sShannon’s Diversity Index = H’ = - Pi * lnPi

i=1

H’ ranges from ~ 1 – 3.5, usu. not > 4.5

Evenness = E = H’ ln(s)

E ranges from 0-1

Page 13: Fundamental Degradation Terminology

13

Example calculation: How to calculate H’ & E given data

Site 1 Site 2

sH’ = - Pi * lnPi

i=1

E = H’

ln(s)

Species

ni

Pi

lnPi

Pi*lnPi

Species

ni

Pi

lnPi

Pi*lnPi

E= E=

Page 14: Fundamental Degradation Terminology

14

Q: Relationship between stability and diversityAre diverse systems more stable than simple systems?

Pimm et al. (1995)?

Stability-Diversity Relationship

1. Species Diversity:

Eveness, richness, H’, etc.

2. Functional Diversity:The range and value of traits that influences ecosystem functioning; “the component

of diversity that influences ecosystem dynamics, stability, productivity, nutrient balance, and other aspects of ecosystem functioning” from Tilman, D. 2001

“Functional Diversity” in the Dictionary of Biodiversity

Page 15: Fundamental Degradation Terminology

15

Additional Materials

Page 16: Fundamental Degradation Terminology

16

D. Successional Theories

1. Clementian: holistic approach, sees succession as orderly, directional, predictable, system proceeds towards stable climax community

a. autogenic-internal

A B C D

F. Clements

Page 17: Fundamental Degradation Terminology

17

2. Gleasonian: individualistic approach, sees succession as disorderly, stochastic, unpredictable, determined by chance events, no climax community

b. allogenic-external

B

A D

C

H. Gleason

Page 18: Fundamental Degradation Terminology

18

Which theory is correct?

Relationship of succession with stability?

Relationship w/ current restoration practices?

Neither, examples for which each theory works

Gleasonian probably closer to reality than Clementian

Clements argue that climax community = evidence of stability

Gleason would discount stability altogether

Self-design – Clementian

Designer theory - Gleasonian

Page 19: Fundamental Degradation Terminology

19

II. Sustainability Terminology

A. Basic Definitions

1. Primary (1o) Productivity: increase in biomass of green plants over a given period

2. Sustainable Yield: fraction of net 1o prod removed on a continuous basis w/o destroying/ 1o prod

3. Carrying Capacity: max. # of individuals supported by a given env.

4. Sustainable Development (SD): Any activity that raises social welfare w/ maximum amount

of resource conservation & minimum amount of environ. degr. allowable w/i given econ, social, technical constraints

a. Implies anticipate & avoid rather than react & cure mentality

Page 20: Fundamental Degradation Terminology

20

a. Alpha (α) Div: w/i site or habitat

b. Beta (β) Div: from site to site or along transect, gradient

c. Gamma (γ) Div: diversity of a larger geographical unit, i.e. landscape or region; γ div. = (α & β)

Which site has highest α diversity?

Which region has highest β diversity?

Which region has highest γ diversity?

Sites 1 & 3

Region Y, higher species turnover

Region Y w/ higher total # of species