frederic gaurier selfperf -...
TRANSCRIPT
25/07/2012
1
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om
Advancing Supply Chain Integration with the Sell‐Through Monitor
TRACK : Alignment to Demand Cultivating shared business goals and Demand chain alignment
Frederic Gaurier SelfSelfPerfPerf.com.com
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
Frederic Gaurier• Two decades of experience gathered as operational manager,
total quality assessment officer, management and continuous improvement consultantimprovement consultant
• More recently, head of supplier performance improvement for a leading international luxury goods manufacturer.
• Founder in 2011 of SelfPerf.com, aimed at giving simple access to operations basic best practices– proofed on the field by organizations from 10 to 10.000proofed on the field by organizations from 10 to 10.000– in industry, service, B2B, B2C, exclusive or consumer goods – in America, Europe and Asia, in more than 15 countries
2
25/07/2012
2
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
This session in 100 words• The new business paradigm is based on shorter life cycles,
greater amount of special deals, enriching standard products distribution.
• As an example, in “fashion” business, operations are driven by seasonal products and "sell thru" monitoring has become a classical practice. This could be used as an inspiration.
• Discover how a simple, single, well chosen KPI can align the whole supply chain and stimulate coordinated continuous improvement, from supplier's suppliers to final customer's storesstores.
• As an example, practices and results from last 5 years experience are shared, applying also to small and medium‐sized businesses.
3
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
What has ACME company and its partners achieved from 2005 to 2010 ?
• Number of products sold increased by 100%
• Manufacturing lead time reduced by 30%
• Distribution lead time reduced by 50%
• Procurement lead time reduced by 60%y
• Inventory value limited to 5% increase only
4
25/07/2012
3
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
Here is the story…
• A main business performance KPI has been chosen: “SellThru”has been chosen: SellThru
• Sharing of related data established
• Weekly monitoring and analysis for actions
• Deployment all across supply chain, f i l’ li i f l
SergioACME Boss
from raw material’s suppliers to points of sales
• SellThru index 100 in 2005 125 in 2010
5
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
Improved performance : how ?
• SellThru explained to everyone and continuous work done on 3 key leverages across the supply chaindone on 3 key leverages across the supply chain
6
25/07/2012
4
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
Involvement all across the supply chain
SergioBoss
Jenny
AlisonMarketingManager
MarcySupply Chain
PlannerHugoProcurementManager
Anita and BenCustomers
7
JennyStore
ManagerStanley
Raw material supplier
DanPlant Director
LawrenceLogisticsManager
BrianWholesaler
Manager
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
Let’s learn from their success
1. “SellThru”… what is it really ?
2. Global planning and monitoring works !
3. Speed up distribution and lower inventory
4. Involve upstream supply network
5. A starter kit for your own journey…5. A starter kit for your own journey…
8
25/07/2012
5
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
1. “SellThru”… what is it really ?
SergioBoss
JennySt
AlisonMarketingManager
MarcySupply Chain
Planner
9
Store ManagerDan
Plant Director
LawrenceLogisticsManager
BrianWholesaler
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
Common calculation of SellThruin a retailing store
Sales in period Inventory beginning of period
• Measured in %
• Example : – 100 pants #A sold this week100 pants #A sold this week– Inventory item #A on last Monday morning = 800– SellThru item #A is 100/800 = 12,5% this week
10
25/07/2012
6
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
Usual practices with SellThru in point of sales are…• Item classification
– Hot products (high SellThru)– Slow movers (low SellThru)
• Selling and replenishing priority– Promotion on aging inventory– Frequent or higher quantity of reorder on fast sellers
• Manage returns (clothing, books…) or discount (software…)
• On internet stores: item product category– Units number of item ID# actually sold– Inventory number of item ID# listed
11
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
In retail, SellThru is also used to trigger decisions and actions• For inventory monitoring
C (i b f i d) 1 / S llTh ( i d)– Coverage (in number of period) = 1 / SellThru (period)Ex.: with 800 items #A, you cover 8 weeks of sales– Replenishment: overrides order point if > alert levelEx.: 50% SellThru this week with usual 3 weeks replenishment
• With a dynamically and consolidated view– Increasing: means “reorder more” – Decreasing: questions selling efficiency or customer’s interest
12
25/07/2012
7
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
How to get better SellThru ?
• Higher sales as regards stable inventory– Based on former example :Based on former example :
• 200 pants #A sold this other week• SellThru item #A is 200/800 = 25% that week
• Lower inventory as regards regular sales– Based on other example :Based on other example :
• Inventory item #A on other Monday morning is 400• SellThru item #A is 100/400 = 25% that week
13
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
A wide variety of understanding and therefore opportunities• Calculation can be
– Daily for fast‐moversDaily for fast‐movers– Weekly or monthly for slow movers
• Inventory can be – physical only or including orders and transit– in units or in value
S l b• Sales can be – rough or net (ex.: sell‐in vs. sell‐out, with or w/o scrap)– in units or in value
14
25/07/2012
8
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
• Customer sales could be shared with everyone in the• Customer sales could be shared with everyone in the whole supply chain ?
• … and become a baseline for all ?
• Inventories could be added up and considered as one single baseline as well ?single baseline as well ?
• Both could be combined and give birth to a simple, single monitor ?
15
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
Then…
• Whole supply chain is reactive to demand evolutionis reactive to demand evolution
• Everyone in the chain acts in same direction
• Action of one has an impact for all
• This requires coordination– SellThru objectivesSellThru objectives– SellThru alert levels to stop or trigger supply– Priority settings for actions on sales or inventory
16
25/07/2012
9
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
2. Global planning and monitoring works !
AliSergioBoss
AlisonMarketingManagerMarcy
Supply ChainPlanner
17
DanPlant Director
LawrenceLogisticsManager
StanleyRaw material
supplierHugo
ProcurementManager
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
SellThru as global business KPI
SellThru (NEW) =
Σ SALES to Final Customer_______________________________
ΣMANUFACTURED Finished goods+
Global inventory at beginning of
18
Global inventory at beginning of period
25/07/2012
10
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
Better reactivity to actual sales ?
19
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
ExampleProduct launch
• Period = 25 weeks of sales (1 season)f ( )
• Inventory baseline (100%) = level at Sales start
• Targeted SellThru for season = 95%
• Targeted customer service = 0% o.o.s. (out of stock)
• Max. manufacturing weekly capacity = 10% baseline
• Production ramp‐up = 50% of capacity during 2 weeks
20
25/07/2012
11
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
ExampleProduct parameters
• Replenishment: lead time = 4 weeksReplenishment: lead time = 4 weeks
• Economic Order Quantity = 20% of baseline
• Manufacturing 1st work order = 50% baselineThen, manufacturing work order = 35% until W19
E d f ll ti W25• End of collection = W25
21
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
Product launch – Planned profile
70%
80%
90%
100%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Planned production Planned Inventory
Planned SellThru
22
25/07/2012
12
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
Product launch – Actual (+20%)
70%
80%
90%
100%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Planned production Actual productionPlanned Inventory Planned SellThruActual SellThru Actual Inventory
23
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
Benefits of sharing SellThru
• Manufacturing can react without waiting for the classical successive replenishment orders ofclassical successive replenishment orders of distribution levels
• Inventory of finished goods is monitored from the beginning, in order to have the relevant global level
• The only focus of distribution can be the speed of e o y ocus o d s bu o ca be e speed oflows from manufacturing to point of sales and the balanced response to actual demand
24
25/07/2012
13
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
QuestionsQuestions and
answers
25
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
3. Speed up distribution and lower inventory
MarcySupply Chain
Planner
JennyStore
Manager
26
DanPlant Director
LawrenceLogisticsManager
StanleyRaw material
supplierHugo
ProcurementManager
BrianWholesaler
25/07/2012
14
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
Better distribution inventory management ?
27
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
Classical approach: safety stock
• SS = Z x (LeadTime(in weeks) x σS²) + (Sales(Weekly)² x σLT²)
• Example : – Z = 1,65 for 95,05% *– LT = 2 weeks with σLT = 0,2 weeks– Sales = 100 units per week, with σS = 10 units
– SS = 1,65 x (4 x 100) + (10.000 x 0,04)= 1,65 x 800≈ 47 (≈50% of weekly demand)
* Source = Gaussian distribution tables28
25/07/2012
15
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
Classical approach applied:high cost for poor service ?
CentralPlants Regional
warehousesRegional
warehouses
Business Unit Distribution
Centralware‐house
S& OP
Sup‐pliers
Subcon‐tractors
warehousesWholesalers
Stores
warehousesWholesalers
Stores
Production
95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95%
Supp
lier
Custom
er
≈ 1 every 4 final customer not satisfied in average
29
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
The classical approach drives more local optima than global efficiency• Each step has an inventory calculated
– To cover demand variability with a safety stock (SS)To cover demand variability with a safety stock (SS)– To ensure a service level depending on the choice of Z
• Usual performance is based on – Targeted service level of each step– Standard lead time at expected cost and budget compliance
• Therefore, monitoring is based on, g– Each steps performance and KPIs local optimization– Global performance costs, margin, sales, ads efficiency
30
25/07/2012
16
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
Limits of classical approach: a trade‐off between cost and service quality• Replenishment is long from manufacturing to POS
– Products are mainly « pushed » to meet demand, because y p ,« pulling » is not satisfactory for customers (too long waiting) or for the company (missed sales)
– High service level requires multiple high inventory levels
• Monitoring is focused on results of each step– Considering that the « sum of parts should make a whole »– Forgetting what happens between steps, because g g pp p ,responsibilities are clearly defined, so « who cares… » ?
• Performance becomes mainly point of sales’ problem
31
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
Additional issues created with cross channel distribution• From multi‐channels’ separated supply chains
– Distribution served from central or regional warehouseDistribution served from central or regional warehouse– Owned stores served from warehouses, with priority– Phone‐selling, served from a central warehouse– E‐commerce served from usually dedicated warehouse
• … to integrated SCM responding to customer– Store + Internet + Phone Call with same expected service
l l h d b k– Requires 1 single central point within distribution network in order to manage balance, priorities and monitor service levels according to selling channel with equal importance
32
25/07/2012
17
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
Additional issues created with cross channel distribution• 80% to 90% of product launches miss the expected targetsmiss the expected targets when a multi‐channel distribution exists(source = Gartner group study ‐ 2012)
• Replenishment rules are different between channels
• Data process and management rules areData, process and management rules are usually contradictory
33
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
Work differently with SellThru as unique and shared KPI• Working on processes higher speed
L i t i t– Lower inventory requirements– Quicker replenishments – Reactivity to final customer demand
• Shorter lead times are obtained by– Reliability: reduction of internally created variabilityy y y– Elimination of wastes– Higher frequency of delivery with smaller lot sizes– Bottlenecks identification and elimination
34
25/07/2012
18
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
SellThru approach appliedThe results
Central S &Plants
Sup‐Regional
warehousesRegional
warehouses
Business Unit Distribution
Central ware‐house
S & OP
SuppliersSubcon‐
tractors
warehousesRetailersStores
warehousesRetailersStores
Production
99%
Pushed Pulled100% 100%99% 99%
Pulled100%99%
Supp
lier
Cus
tom
er
100% %99% 99% %
≈ 1 every 25 final customer not satisfied in average
35
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
Working on speed and inventory has created a momentum…• Each logistic step becomes a point where the throughput should be as quick as possibleg p q p– Work on incoming, cross‐dock and outgoing flows
• Safety stock is managed once in central warehouse– Allow 99% safety stock for similar costs– Reduction by √n compared to safety stock in n places– Rebalancing easy between channels and geography– Reactivity is high because minimum lead time to replenish points of sales (0,5 to 1,5 days maxi)
36
25/07/2012
19
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
QuestionsQuestions and
answers
37
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
4. Involve upstream supply network
SergioBoss
DanPlant Director
Marcy
38
StanleyRaw material
supplier
ySupply Chain
PlannerHugo
ProcurementManager
25/07/2012
20
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
Improving everyone’s capabilities ?
39
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
A maturity model becomes necessaryto align, educate and sustain action• Waste elimination and variability reduction is performed through quality and lean toolsperformed through quality and lean tools– Focused problem solving and root cause elimination– 20% to 60% lead time crunch done with field people
• Based on the success obtained in speed and inventory, a common maturity roadmap arisesa common maturity roadmap arises– Quicker improvement by selfassessment– Same language and practices, each other’s help stimulated
40
25/07/2012
21
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
Return on experience, innovative change:a continuous improvement roadmap• Sustainable performance framework
• 8 diamond key operations fundamentals for structuring maturity levels
• 4 domains to explore and self assess performance – Customers– Products / servicesProducts / services– Processes– Durability (global management systems)
41
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.comInvestigate weak performance areas
revealed by low SellThru
Source and framework forglobal and sustainable performance
25/07/2012
22
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.comInvestigate weak performance areas
revealed by low SellThru
Source for structuring maturity levels
43
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.comInvestigate weak performance areas
revealed by low SellThru
Structure used to assess
and measure practices
44
practices periodically
25/07/2012
23
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
5. A starter kit for your own journey…
Anita and BenCustomers
45
Customers
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
ProductS iCustomer
Continuous improvement with a common maturity model
DurabilityProcesses
Service
46
4 areas to be explored, step by step, merging the best of Operations Management standards
(ISO9000, Lean management, TQM and Sustainability…)
4 areas to be explored, step by step, merging the best of Operations Management standards
(ISO9000, Lean management, TQM and Sustainability…)
25/07/2012
24
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
Continuous improvement with a common maturity model
47
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
Continuous improvement with a common maturity model
48
25/07/2012
25
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.comContinuous improvement with a common
maturity model
49
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
Continuous improvement with a common maturity model
50
25/07/2012
26
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.comContinuous improvement with
a common maturity model
51
Single and systematic quotation rulesfor each practice
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.comC(2/2). Continuous improvement with
a common maturity model
Each practice, within each topic,
at every maturity level
Each practice, within each topic,
at every maturity levelat every maturity level should be quoted in order to have a complete view.
Lowest levels show improvement priorities.
at every maturity level should be quoted in order to have a complete view.
Lowest levels show improvement priorities.
52
Quotation should be reviewed every 6
months.
Quotation should be reviewed every 6
months.Example of quotation
25/07/2012
27
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.comContinuous improvement with
a common maturity model
Adapt deployment approach to your context
Improve continuously
53
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
Case learning after 5 years of deployment and use• Dos
Focus on evolution (improvement) more than an absolute level– Focus on evolution (improvement) more than an absolute level– Select actions according to stakes and customer view– Periodically re‐assess where you are, where you go and adjust
action plan
• Don’ts– Do the assessment alone (better as steering committee activity)( g y)– Try to perform actions on all and every theme – Do it for the customer only, do it for yourself
54
25/07/2012
28
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
New requirementsregarding the supply chain• Consolidated monitoring
Gl b l i t l l ithi th h l SC– Global inventory level within the whole SC– Distribution and location of inventory along the SC
• Ability to react quickly in case of – Inventory shortage or excess as regards global demand
dtrends– Unbalance between demand and delivery capacity in specific points of distribution
55
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
New requirements regarding business and monitoring• Adapt marketing and merchandising according to
product availability issuesp y– Development concerns (quality, colors…)– Manufacturing issues (capacity, social, technical…)– Quick response required by competition offering
• Share information more frequently along the chainA ti i t i k d t d i t d f di i i– Anticipate risks and trends instead of discovering issues
– Unpredicted demand (ex. : Madonna’s “Manhattan bag”)– ADAWAT
56
25/07/2012
29
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
Case: Return on experienceDo’s• Share data
• Know margin of error and have accurate data, instead of investing tremendous efforts in precision that creates inaccuracy
• Have common definition of KPI’s and of the shared KPI “SellThru”Se u
• Share objectives and meet frequently to talk issues and news based on the same data
57
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
Case: Return on experienceDon’ts• Work in silo (responsibility is good, but no cooperation is destructive)cooperation is destructive)
• Optimize locally only (good for local but counterproductive for client)
• Divide information and objective in order to better controlco o
58
25/07/2012
30
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
Case: Return on experienceConsequences on SCM• Recurring source of issues easy to spot
• More time spent on investigating root causes
• Effect of sustainable problem solving easier to measure on the whole chain
• Support needed from central towards up‐ or down‐istream operations
59
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
Case: Return on experienceConsequence of consequence…• Effort necessary to strive for best practices and practice them
• Not enough resources to cover all
• Context created awareness and acceptance for self‐assessment (because 200 suppliers audits not affordable)
Self roadmap for manufacturing and suppliers, in order to sustainably improve performance
Key : automated replenishment systems to reduce lead times in distribution + DRP to rebalance inventory + staffed flow managers
60
25/07/2012
31
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
How to use as global business KPI ?
Performance (SellThru) = Actual % − Planned %
Success beyond forecasts ?Manufacturing issues ?
Low interest of customers ?Sales efficiency ?ER
T
‐5 0 +5 ‐15 ‐10 +10 +15
Too much hard selling ?Inventory release too early ?…
Advance in manufacturing ?Unbalanced inventory ?
…
ALE
61
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
How to use as global business KPI ?
Performance (SellThru) = Actual % − Planned %
‐5 0 +5 ‐15 ‐10 +10 +15
ION
More promotion ?Adjust merchandising ?Reduce subcontracting ?
Increase industrial capacity?Speed logistic flows ?Manage shortage set quotas ?
62
ACTI Reduce subcontracting ?Run DRP and rebalance ?
…
Manage shortage, set quotas ?Suppress special offers ? …
25/07/2012
32
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
Benefits of SellThru as business KPI
• Sharing objectives and efforts timelyi di i b t ll t f th l h i– easier discussion between all actors of the supply chain
and all functional experts: synchronization of efforts in time and in subject matter
– less fight on figures and more time to analyze and take decisions
– less effort in KPIs calculation, consolidation and sharing as d b d ( f d fadministrative burden or IS requirements (1 set of data for KPI, instead of 1 per inventory location)
63
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
Remember what has ACME company and its partners achieved from 2005 to 2010
• Number of products sold increased by 100%
• Manufacturing lead time reduced by 30%
• Distribution lead time reduced by 50%
• Procurement lead time reduced by 60%y
• Inventory value limited to 5% increase only
64
25/07/2012
33
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om©
201
2 -F
rede
ric G
aurie
r –w
ww
.Sel
fPer
f.com
QuestionsQuestions and
answers
65
© 2
012
-Fre
deric
Gau
rier –
ww
w.S
elfP
erf.c
om
Contact information:
e‐mail: [email protected]
twitter: fredgaurierg
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/gaurier
Visit: www.selfperf.com