fpl2012 tf#7brussels 10 october 2012 kim breivik operational requirements network management...

20
FPL2012 TF#7 Brussels 10 October 2012 Kim Breivik Operational Requirements Network Management EUROCONTROL Deployment

Upload: martina-bishop

Post on 03-Jan-2016

219 views

Category:

Documents


5 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: FPL2012 TF#7Brussels 10 October 2012 Kim Breivik Operational Requirements Network Management EUROCONTROL Deployment

FPL2012 TF#7 Brussels10 October 2012

Kim Breivik

Operational Requirements

Network Management

EUROCONTROL

Deployment

Page 2: FPL2012 TF#7Brussels 10 October 2012 Kim Breivik Operational Requirements Network Management EUROCONTROL Deployment

FPL2012 TF#7 10 October 2012 2

Deployment Content

• Deployment Policy• Transition• Contingency

• States• IFPS• AOs

• Preparation• Formal Feedback (State Letter) – EUR Implementation Plan• AIC Publication• NEC Feedback for IFPS

• Documentation• IFPS User Manual• Doc. 7030• CNS Filing ‘Guidance Material’

• Training

Page 3: FPL2012 TF#7Brussels 10 October 2012 Kim Breivik Operational Requirements Network Management EUROCONTROL Deployment

FPL2012 TF#7 10 October 2012 3

EUR Region Deployment Policy

Objective: All FPLs in New format from 15/11

• AOs and CFSPs should submit FPLs in New format from 00:01UTC on 12 Nov 2012 onwards• AROs, IFPS, ATC systems should accept New from 12/11

• FPLs should NOT be submitted in Old format after 00:01UTC on 15 Nov 2012

IFPS will not accept FPLs with DOF on 15 Nov during the period 10 -13 Nov 2012

RPLs for Winter ’12-’13 should be submitted in New format

Page 4: FPL2012 TF#7Brussels 10 October 2012 Kim Breivik Operational Requirements Network Management EUROCONTROL Deployment

FPL2012 TF#7 10 October 2012 4© EUROCONTROL2009 - Central Flow Management Unit

Transition – IFPS ANSPs

00:0015/11/2012

Reception of Old by ANSPs

Reception of New by ANSPs

IFPS Translation from New to Old

Possible transition for an IFPS State without a period of mixed reception of Old and New

ENV Parameter per Addressee (ICAO_2012_READY_DATE)

Default = 00:00UTC on 16/11/2012

- 72 hrs + 24 hrs

*Applicable only for IFR/GAT FPLs !

Page 5: FPL2012 TF#7Brussels 10 October 2012 Kim Breivik Operational Requirements Network Management EUROCONTROL Deployment

FPL2012 TF#7 10 October 2012 5© EUROCONTROL2009 - Central Flow Management Unit

ANSP Database Content

≈ FPL Dist. Parameter and Size of Airspace

IFPS ‘FPL2012_READY’ Parameter

Old format only

New format only

Page 6: FPL2012 TF#7Brussels 10 October 2012 Kim Breivik Operational Requirements Network Management EUROCONTROL Deployment

FPL2012 TF#7 10 October 2012 6© EUROCONTROL2009 - Central Flow Management Unit

Reception by IFPS/ACCs of Old format on 15/11

FPL received by ARO in Old format

InitialEOBT Flying time to

Europe = 12hrs

24 hrs

FPL distributed by ARO & received by IFPS / ANSPs in Old format !

ACCs don’t want to receive FPLs +/- 18hrs in advance therefore FPLs frequently distributed by ARO several hours after reception:

Long-haul flight departing outside Europe:

Page 7: FPL2012 TF#7Brussels 10 October 2012 Kim Breivik Operational Requirements Network Management EUROCONTROL Deployment

FPL2012 TF#7 10 October 2012 7© EUROCONTROL2009 - Central Flow Management Unit

Reception by ACCs of Old format from IFPS after 16 Nov (1)

Received by IFPSin Old format

EOBT

24 hrs

Flying time to Europe = 12hrs

FPL Dist Parametere.g. – 4hrs

FPL reception by ANSP in Old format

Long-haul flight departing outside Europe:

DLA

Page 8: FPL2012 TF#7Brussels 10 October 2012 Kim Breivik Operational Requirements Network Management EUROCONTROL Deployment

FPL2012 TF#7 10 October 2012 8

Re-Addressing by IFPS

FF EUCHZMFP EUCBZMFP250920 EGLLZPZXAD ADDRESS1 ADDRESS2(FPL-ABC123-I/S......)

Aircraft Operator

IFPS

AD Line Addressing

Normal Addressing

Page 9: FPL2012 TF#7Brussels 10 October 2012 Kim Breivik Operational Requirements Network Management EUROCONTROL Deployment

FPL2012 TF#7 10 October 2012 9

Re-Addressing & 2012 Transition

• ‘Unknown’ (= address doesn’t exist in IFPS database) AD Line addressees

• Receive Old format prior to 15 Nov

• Receive New format after 15 Nov

• ‘Known’ AD Line addressees

• Receive Old/New in accordance with ENV parameters for the unit concerned

Page 10: FPL2012 TF#7Brussels 10 October 2012 Kim Breivik Operational Requirements Network Management EUROCONTROL Deployment

FPL2012 TF#7 10 October 2012 10

AO - FPL Submission Scenarios

1. Entirely within IFPZ

a) May be submitted to IFPS in New format now

b) May be submitted in Old format until 23:59 on14/11

c) Should be submitted in New format from 12/11

d) Shall be submitted in New format from 15/11

2. Departing to outside IFPZ

Same as for 1. and may inc. AD line addresses in each of the cases a) to d)

3. Departing from outside IFPZ

Should be submitted to ARO at ADEP in accordance with State requirements

Page 11: FPL2012 TF#7Brussels 10 October 2012 Kim Breivik Operational Requirements Network Management EUROCONTROL Deployment

FPL2012 TF#7 10 October 2012 11

IFPS Default Addressing Scenarios

AD UKKKZQZQ UREEZQZX UARRZQZX (FPL-AZA123-I/S-A334/H-B2GRSYW/S1-LIRF1800-N0460F380…….-VIDP0750 VIDD-PBN/B2 DOF/121114

Normal - Old format

Copy - Old format

‘AD’ - Old format

Normal - New format

Copy - New format

‘AD’ - New format

Page 12: FPL2012 TF#7Brussels 10 October 2012 Kim Breivik Operational Requirements Network Management EUROCONTROL Deployment

FPL2012 TF#7 10 October 2012 12

IFPS Default Addressing Scenarios cont.

AD UKDDZQZX UREEZQZX UARRZQZX (FPL-AZA123-I/S-A334/H-B2GRSYW/S-LIRF1800-N0460F380…….-VIDP0750 VIDD-PBN/B2 DOF/121115

Normal - Old format

Copy - Old format

‘AD’ - Old format

Normal - New format

Copy - New format

‘AD’ - New format

Page 13: FPL2012 TF#7Brussels 10 October 2012 Kim Breivik Operational Requirements Network Management EUROCONTROL Deployment

FPL2012 TF#7 10 October 2012 13

IFPS Default Addressing Scenarios cont.

AD UKDDZQZX UREEZQZX UARRZQZX (FPL-AZA123-I/S-A334/H-B2GRSYW/S-LIRF1800-N0460F380…….-VIDP0750 VIDD-PBN/B2 DOF/121116

Normal - Old format

Copy - Old format

‘AD’ - Old format

Normal - New format

Copy - New format

‘AD’ - New format

Page 14: FPL2012 TF#7Brussels 10 October 2012 Kim Breivik Operational Requirements Network Management EUROCONTROL Deployment

FPL2012 TF#7 10 October 2012 14

Mixed Mode - Considerations

(FPL-AZA123-I/S-A334/H-B2RSYW/S1-LIRF1800-N0460F380…….-VIDP0750 VIDD-PBN/B2 DOF/121114

Old format

New format

Aircraft Operator

Departure

ACC 1

ACC 2

ACC 3

Destination

(DEP-AZA123-LIRF1830-VIDP-DOF/121115)

?

?

?

(ARR-AZA123-LIRF-VIDP0110)

‘New’

‘New’

‘Old’

‘Old’

‘Old’

Page 15: FPL2012 TF#7Brussels 10 October 2012 Kim Breivik Operational Requirements Network Management EUROCONTROL Deployment

FPL2012 TF#7 10 October 2012 15

Problem Example

• An example from 24th September:

1. TAM submit (using SITA service) a FPL in New format including the IFPS addresses

2. IFPS automatically rejects due to a syntax error (NAV/ contains too many characters) and sends a REJ to TAM

3. TAM don’t understand the error and are unable to correct it because it doesn’t reflect the message they sent!

Analysis made with Madrid Comms centre, SITA, TAM and Brasilian authorities reveals:

Brasil Comms centre translated into Old format believing IFPS requires it.

Page 16: FPL2012 TF#7Brussels 10 October 2012 Kim Breivik Operational Requirements Network Management EUROCONTROL Deployment

FPL2012 TF#7 10 October 2012 16

Roll-Over Period - Analysis

• Technical Conclusions• IFPS and/or an ATC unit may expect to receive some,

legitimately submitted, Old format messages on 15 Nov• IFPS and/or an ATC unit may expect to receive both Old and

New format messages for the same flight• The communications network can influence the result therefore

end-to-end (OPT) testing essential• A State having installed a translator at the level of the Comms

Centre must be sure it will switch correctly on 15/11

• Procedural Conclusion• AOs should submit in New format from 12/11. Certainly if any

part of a flight could possibly occur on the 15th, then all messages should be submitted in New format

• IFPOs need to be aware that not all errors are due to originator mistakes

Page 17: FPL2012 TF#7Brussels 10 October 2012 Kim Breivik Operational Requirements Network Management EUROCONTROL Deployment

FPL2012 TF#7 10 October 2012 17

Contingency – IFPS State

• An IFPS State which experiences a problem with the switch to New format can request to revert to Old format• Via request to IFPS Supervisor

• Messages processed by IFPS prior to the change back to Old and awaiting transmission will still be received in New format

(short FPL Distribution Parameter = short transition period)

Page 18: FPL2012 TF#7Brussels 10 October 2012 Kim Breivik Operational Requirements Network Management EUROCONTROL Deployment

FPL2012 TF#7 10 October 2012 18

Contingency – Non-IFPS State

• A non-IFPS State which experiences a problem with the switch to New format can have FPLs received via IFPS re-addressing function (AD line addressing) sent in Old format

• Via request to IFPS Supervisor• Only a partial solution – not relevant to FPLs that don’t

penetrate the IFPS zone (IFPZ) or VFR or OAT

Page 19: FPL2012 TF#7Brussels 10 October 2012 Kim Breivik Operational Requirements Network Management EUROCONTROL Deployment

FPL2012 TF#7 10 October 2012 19

Contingency – Flight Plan Providers

• No mitigation against the need to submit in New format from 15/11

Provided at least a portion of flight (IFR) is within the IFPS Zone then:• An AFTN communication problem can be mitigated by:

• Submitting directly to IFPS via SITA network using IFPS SITA addresses (BRUEP7X + PAREP7X)

• Submitting directly to IFPS via B2B (for existing B2B users, cannot be implemented at short notice)

• An ATC unit outside IFPZ having announced it’s unable to accept New format can be addressed via AD line

Page 20: FPL2012 TF#7Brussels 10 October 2012 Kim Breivik Operational Requirements Network Management EUROCONTROL Deployment

FPL2012 TF#7 10 October 2012 20

Deployment Content

• Deployment Policy• Transition• Contingency

• States• IFPS• AOs

• Preparation• Formal Feedback (State Letter) – EUR Implementation Plan• AIC Publication• NEC Feedback for IFPS

• Documentation• IFPS User Manual• Doc. 7030• CNS Filing ‘Guidance Material’

• Training