fluent combustion

13
 © 2012 ANSYS, Inc. March 12, 2013 1 Release 14.5  14.5 Release Lecture 7 Tips & Tricks Advanced Combustion Modeling

Upload: esmail

Post on 05-Oct-2015

43 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Fluent CombustionFluent CombustionFluent CombustionFluent CombustionFluent CombustionFluent CombustionFluent Combustion

TRANSCRIPT

  • 2012 ANSYS, Inc. March 12, 2013 1 Release 14.5

    14.5 Release

    Lecture 7 Tips & Tricks

    Advanced Combustion Modeling

  • 2012 ANSYS, Inc. March 12, 2013 2 Release 14.5

    General Guidelines

    Boundary conditions

    Combustion is often very sensitive to inlet boundary conditions Correct velocity and scalar profiles can be critical

    Wall heat transfer is challenging to predict; if known, specify wall temperature instead of external convection/radiation BC

    Discretization

    Start with first order, then converge with second order to improve accuracy Second order discretization especially important for tri/tet meshes

    Initial conditions

    While steady-state solution is independent of the IC, poor IC may cause divergence due to the number and nonlinearity of the transport equations

    Cold flow solution, then gas combustion, then particles, then radiation

  • 2012 ANSYS, Inc. March 12, 2013 3 Release 14.5

    Solution strategies for gas phase reactions

    Non-premixed model:

    in general there is no need to solve first the cold flow, or to patch high temperature

    Start with the reacting flow simulation without radiation Enable radiation once the main flow feature and temperature field have been

    established

    Eddy dissipation/finite rate model:

    Start with a cold flow solution Patching of products and/or high temperature is needed to start the reactions Use temperature dependent cps to avoid unrealistically high temperatures

  • 2012 ANSYS, Inc. March 12, 2013 4 Release 14.5

    Solution strategies for gas phase reactions

    Default URF could be too aggressive for complex reacting flow system

    The effect of underrelaxation is highly non-linear

    Decrease the diverging residual URF in increments of 0.1

    Underrelax density when using the mixture-fraction PDF model (0.7)

    Underrelax velocity for high buoyancy flows

    Underrelax species to start up the solution (0.9 or lower)

    Once solution is stable, attempt to increase species, energy, mixture and radiation URFs as close as possible to 1

    Best Practice for the Non-Premixed model are available on the customer portal

  • 2012 ANSYS, Inc. March 12, 2013 5 Release 14.5

    Solution strategies for DPM reacting flow (steady)

    Converge the non reacting flow using first order discretization

    After the flow field has been established start the particle tracking

    Depending on the model and conditions patching might be required

    Patching high temperature to start the evaporation or devolatilisation If using the Eddy dissipation model patching some products to start the gas phase

    reactions

    Run the case tracking particle every 20-30 gas phase iterations and lowering the URF for the DPM source term (0.1-0.2)

    Enabled radiation only after the main temperature field and flame shape have been established

    Solve until a good heat and mass balance have been achieved

  • 2012 ANSYS, Inc. March 12, 2013 6 Release 14.5

    Solution strategies for DPM reacting flow (unsteady)

    The DPM source terms are updated only every particle iteration. If the DPM under-relaxation factor is smaller than one:

    If only one particle iteration is performed within the time step: check the Update DPM source at every iteration option and make sure that enough gas phase iterations are calculated within each time step

    Or take care that sufficient particle iterations are performed within the time step in order to achieve the full source terms (not recommended due to CPU penalties)

    Use smaller time steps if it does not converge. (make sure that the solution is converge within each time step)

  • 2012 ANSYS, Inc. March 12, 2013 7 Release 14.5

    Troubleshooting DPM

    Start DPM particle/droplet too early before the flow field has been developed is often the cause of convergence issues in reacting flow DPM problem

    Increasing the number of tries and having more iterations between DPM tracks generally helps to make the solution more stable

    If there are a large number of incomplete particle you should increase the max number steps in the Discrete Phase model panel

  • 2012 ANSYS, Inc. March 12, 2013 8 Release 14.5

    Initial conditions and set up A poor initial condition might cause the stiff chemistry solver to fail A good initial solutions can be calculated using the non-premixed or

    eddy dissipation models, that would provide a good initial guess (temperature and species) for the stiff chemistry solver

    ISAT tolerance Start with the default 10e-3 and increase the table size from the

    default 100 MB

    To fully converge the solution decrease the ISAT tolerance and make sure that the solution is independent from any table interpolation error

    EDC model, Laminar-Finite Rate (with stiff chemistry solver), Eulerian Composition PDF (with stiff chemistry solver)

    For some cases, the models tend to converge slowly, to speed up the convergence change the Aggressiveness Factor

    Aggressiveness Factor [between 0 (most robust but slowest convergence) and 1]

    Solution strategies for detailed chemistry

  • 2012 ANSYS, Inc. March 12, 2013 9 Release 14.5

    Convergence

    Residuals should be less than 10-3 except for T and P-1 and species, which should be less than 10-6

    The mass and energy flux reports must balance

    The fluxes can be checked from the report fluxes menu The flux report will include only heat and mass flux at the boundary (not any

    additional source term in the fluid or solid domain)

    Monitor variables of interest (e.g. mean temperature at the outlet): solution is stable and not changing if running the case further

    Ensure contour plots of field variables are smooth, realistic and steady

  • 2012 ANSYS, Inc. March 12, 2013 10 Release 14.5

    report/species-mass-flow

    Print list of species mass flow rate at inlets and outlets

    Available after performing 1 iteration

    These options are more accurate than surface integrals at boundary zones since no interpolation is used.

    Report Fluxes

    Species Reports

  • 2012 ANSYS, Inc. March 12, 2013 11 Release 14.5

    Report Fluxes panel will report the DPM sources (mass and enthalpy) as well

    Heat of reaction source is available only after performing 1 iteration

    Mass and Energy Flux in DPM Problems

  • 2012 ANSYS, Inc. March 12, 2013 12 Release 14.5

    Customizing the reaction rate

    Eddy dissipation/finite rate model DEFINE_VR_RATE ( name, c, t, r, mw, yi, rr, rr_t)

    Surface chemistry model DEFINE_SR_RATE ( name, f, t, r, my, yi, rr)

    Multiple char reaction model DEFINE_PR_RATE ( name, c, t, r, mw, ci, p, sf, dif_index, cat_index, rr)

    Premix model UDF for the turbulent flame speed DEFINE_TURB_PREMIX_SOURCE ( name, c, t, turb_flame_speed, source)

    Detailed chemistry model DEFINE_NET_REACTION_RATE( name, p, temp, yi, rr, jac)

    NOx model DEFINE_NOX_RATE ( name, c, t, NOx)

  • 2012 ANSYS, Inc. March 12, 2013 13 Release 14.5

    Summary

    We have tremendous in-house expertise in combustion modeling.

    Industrial experience World-class developers and consultants

    The range of physical models for combustion applications continues to grow.

    We are dedicated to providing better service to our customers; we appreciate and encourage your feedback!

    Several tutorial are available on the customer portal (to be posted soon)

    Advanced Reacting Flow tutorial Intermediate tutorial - applications tutorials with a focus on reacting flows