flow rate control system “step response modeling” february 15, 2006 u.t.c. engineering 329

17
Flow Rate Control Flow Rate Control System System Step Response Modeling” Step Response Modeling” February 15, 2006 February 15, 2006 U.T.C. U.T.C. Engineering 329 Engineering 329

Post on 20-Dec-2015

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Flow Rate Control System “Step Response Modeling” February 15, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329

Flow Rate Control SystemFlow Rate Control System

““Step Response Modeling”Step Response Modeling”

February 15, 2006February 15, 2006

U.T.C.U.T.C.

Engineering 329Engineering 329

Page 2: Flow Rate Control System “Step Response Modeling” February 15, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329

Yellow TeamYellow Team

Jimy GeorgeJimy George Jeff LawrenceJeff LawrenceTaylor MurphyTaylor Murphy Jennifer PotterJennifer Potter

Page 3: Flow Rate Control System “Step Response Modeling” February 15, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329

OutlineOutline

System BackgroundSystem Background• Description, SSOC, Step ResponseDescription, SSOC, Step Response

FOPDT TheoryFOPDT Theory Model TheoryModel Theory ResultsResults ConclusionsConclusions

Page 4: Flow Rate Control System “Step Response Modeling” February 15, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329

Flow System SetupFlow System Setup

Page 5: Flow Rate Control System “Step Response Modeling” February 15, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329

Block DiagramBlock Diagram

Page 6: Flow Rate Control System “Step Response Modeling” February 15, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329

Steady State OperationSteady State Operation

Flow Rate Versus Time @ 80% Input

7576777879808182838485

0 10 20 30 40

Time (s)

Po

wer

Inp

ut

(%)

0

5

10

15

20

25

Flo

w R

ate

(lb

/min

)

Input

Output

Steady Operation

Page 7: Flow Rate Control System “Step Response Modeling” February 15, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329

SSOCSSOCTEAM STEADY STATE OPERATING CURVE

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

m, Input Pump Speed (%)

c, Output Flow Rate (lb/min)

Operating Range for Input

Operating Range for Output

Page 8: Flow Rate Control System “Step Response Modeling” February 15, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329

Step Response: 70%-85%Step Response: 70%-85%

Page 9: Flow Rate Control System “Step Response Modeling” February 15, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329

FOPDT ModelFOPDT Model

Transfer FunctionTransfer Function

1

0

s

Ke st

Page 10: Flow Rate Control System “Step Response Modeling” February 15, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329

FOPDT ModelFOPDT Model

Model EquationModel Equation

Excel ParametersExcel Parameters– ttdd = Time step occurs = Time step occurs– A = Height of StepA = Height of Step– inbl inbl = Initial Input= Initial Input– outbloutbl = Initial Steady Value= Initial Steady Value

0

1)( 0

ttt

d

d

eKtttuAtC

Page 11: Flow Rate Control System “Step Response Modeling” February 15, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329

Experimental and Model Experimental and Model ResultsResults

Experimental and Model Results

70

72

74

76

78

80

82

84

86

24 24.5 25 25.5 26 26.5 27 27.5 28

Time (s)

Inp

ut

(%)

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

Ou

tpu

t (l

b/m

in)

Excel Model of FOPDT

Experimental Values

K (lb/min/%) = 0.26

Tau (sec) = 0.46

t0 (sec) = 0.42

Page 12: Flow Rate Control System “Step Response Modeling” February 15, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329

Experimental and Model Experimental and Model Results…contResults…cont

Experimental and Model Results

70

72

74

76

78

80

82

84

86

24 24.5 25 25.5 26 26.5 27 27.5 28

Time (s)

Inp

ut

(%)

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

Ou

tpu

t (l

b/m

in)

Excel Model of FOPDT

Experimental Data

K (lb/min/%) = 0.27

Tau (sec) = 0.47

t0 (sec) = 0.47

Page 13: Flow Rate Control System “Step Response Modeling” February 15, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329

ResultsResults

Week 3 Values of K

Step down

Step Up Step Up

Step Down

Step UpStep Down

Step Up

Step Down

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Trial

K (lb

/min

/%)

45%-55% 55%-70% 70%-85% 85%-100%

Week 3 Values of K

Step down

Step Up Step Up

Step Down

Step UpStep Down

Step Up

Step Down

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Trial

K (lb

/min

/%)

45%-55% 55%-70% 70%-85% 85%-100%

Week 6 Values of K

Step down

Step Up Step Up

Step Down

Step Up

Step Down

Step Up

Step Down

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Trial

K (lb

/min/

%)

45%-55% 55%-70% 70%-85% 85%-100%

Week 6 Values of K

Step down

Step Up Step Up

Step Down

Step Up

Step Down

Step Up

Step Down

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Trial

K (lb

/min/

%)

45%-55% 55%-70% 70%-85% 85%-100%

Page 14: Flow Rate Control System “Step Response Modeling” February 15, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329

Results … contResults … cont

Week 3 Values of Tau

Step down

Step Up Step Up

Step Down

Step Up

Step Down

Step Up

Step Down0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Trial

Tau

(sec)

45%-55% 55%-70% 70%-85% 85%-100%

Week 3 Values of Tau

Step down

Step Up Step Up

Step Down

Step Up

Step Down

Step Up

Step Down0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Trial

Tau

(sec)

45%-55% 55%-70% 70%-85% 85%-100%

Week 6 Values of Tau

Step down

Step Up Step Up

Step Down

Step Up

Step Down

Step Up

Step Down0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Trial

Tau (

sec)

45%-55% 55%-70% 70%-85% 85%-100%

Week 6 Values of Tau

Step down

Step Up Step Up

Step Down

Step Up

Step Down

Step Up

Step Down0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Trial

Tau (

sec)

45%-55% 55%-70% 70%-85% 85%-100%

Week 6 Values of Tau

Step down

Step Up Step Up

Step Down

Step Up

Step Down

Step Up

Step Down0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Trial

Tau (

sec)

45%-55% 55%-70% 70%-85% 85%-100%

Page 15: Flow Rate Control System “Step Response Modeling” February 15, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329

Results… contResults… cont

Week 3 Values of t0

Step down

Step Up Step Up

Step Down

Step Up

Step Down

Step Up

Step Down0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Trial

t 0 (s

ec)

45%-55% 55%-70% 70%-85% 85%-100%

Week 3 Values of t0

Step down

Step Up Step Up

Step Down

Step Up

Step Down

Step Up

Step Down0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Trial

t 0 (s

ec)

45%-55% 55%-70% 70%-85% 85%-100%

Week 6 Values of t0

Step down

Step Up Step Up

Step Down

Step Up

Step Down

Step Up

Step Down

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Trial

t 0 (s

ec)

45%-55% 55%-70% 70%-85% 85%-100%

Week 6 Values of t0

Step down

Step Up Step Up

Step Down

Step Up

Step Down

Step Up

Step Down

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Trial

t 0 (s

ec)

45%-55% 55%-70% 70%-85% 85%-100%

Week 6 Values of t0

Step down

Step Up Step Up

Step Down

Step Up

Step Down

Step Up

Step Down

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Trial

t 0 (s

ec)

45%-55% 55%-70% 70%-85% 85%-100%

Page 16: Flow Rate Control System “Step Response Modeling” February 15, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329

MODEL PARAMETERSDECREASING

STEADY STATE GAIN K 2.5 V/%

DEAD TIME to 0 s

TIME CONSTANT 0.6 s / 1.2 s / 2.4 s

EXPERIMENTAL PARAMETERSDECREASING

STEADY STATE GAIN K 2.5 V/%

DEAD TIME to 0 s

TIME CONSTANT 0.2 s

OVERALL RESULTS

MODEL PARAMETERS

STEADY STATE GAIN,K = 0.25 lb/min/%

DEAD TIME, to = 0.45 s

TIME CONSTANT, 0.48 s

EXPERIMENTAL PARAMETERS

STEADY STATE GAIN,K = 0.25 lb/min/%

DEAD TIME, to = 0.39 s

TIME CONSTANT, 0.51 s

OVERALL RESULTS

Page 17: Flow Rate Control System “Step Response Modeling” February 15, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329

bbOVERALL RESULTS

Experimental ErrorStandard Deviations

STEADY STATE GAIN,K = ± 0.01(lb/min/%)

DEAD TIME, to = ± 0.08 (sec)

TIME CONSTANT, ± 0.03 (sec)MODEL ErrorStandard Deviation

STEADY STATE GAIN,K = ± 0.01 (lb/min/%)

DEAD TIME, to = ± 0.02 (sec)

TIME CONSTANT, ± 0.04 (sec)