fitness and infectivity of drug- resistant and cross-resistant hbv mutants: why and how studying it?...
TRANSCRIPT
Fitness and infectivity of drug-resistant and cross-resistant
HBV mutants:why and how studying it?
David Durantel 5th of June 2009, Atlanta
Molecular physiopathology and new treatment for viral hepatitis - INSERM U871 (Pr Fabien Zoulim)
HBV life cycle in liver
Blood or inter-hepatocyte
spaces
From Seeger and Mason, Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2000
Zoulim, Antiviral Research 2004
Concepts around treatment failure
Allen et al. Hepatology 1998; Gish et al. J Hepatol 2005; Qi et al. J Hepatol 2004; Tenney et al. AAC 2004; Lai et al. Gastroenterology 2005; Sheldon et al. Antivir Ther 2005; Delaney et al. AAC 2006 ; Schildgen et al NEJM 2006 ; Curtis et al JID 2007.
RNaseH
845 a.a.
Terminal protein Spacer Pol/RTPol/RT
AA BB CC EED D
349 692
YMDD
V173L
L180M M204I/V
I---V------LA---T
I(G)I(G) II(F) II(F)
(rt1) (rt 344)
LAM/ FTC
ETV I169T L180M S202G/I/C M250VT184S/Q/I/L/G/C/M
ADV A181V/T N236TI233V ?
LdT M204ITDF A194T ? ?
M204I/V
HBV drug resistance mutations
* In association wtih rtL180M+rtM204V (to be confirmed)
Impact of mutations in polymerase on S
TerminalProtein
spacer Pol/RT RNaseH
Surface
Polymerase
PreS1 PreS2
N2
36
T
L1
80
M
S
V17
3L
E1
64
D
A18
1V
/T
M2
04
V/I
W1
72*/
L1
73
F
I195
M/
W1
96*
Antiviral Drug-Associated HBsAg ChangesDrug Grouping Resistance Mutations HBsAg Corresponding Changes
L-Nucleosides
(LMV & LdT)
(* LdT)
rtL180M No Change
rtM204V sI195M
rtM204I * sW196*/S/L
Acyclic Phosphonates
(ADV & TFV)
(* LdT) (# LMV)
*#Also Affected
rtA181T *# sW172*
rtA181T *# sW172L
rtA181V * sL173F
rtN236T After End of HBsAg
Cyclopenta(e)ne
(ETV)
rtI169T sF161H/L
rtT184A No Change
rtT184C sL175F + sL176V
rtT184I No Change
rtT184G sL176V
rtT184S sL175F
rtT184M sL176*
rtT184L sL175F
rtS202C No Change / sS193F
rtS202I sV194F/S
rtS202G No Change / sS193L
rtM250I After End of HBsAg
rtM250V After End of HBsAg
Locarnini, Zoulim, submitted to Gastroenterology
Why studying viral fitness
Understand mechanism of emergence of drug-resistant strain
Determine whether a strain can propagate
Better monitoring and prediction of emergence
Define strategy for therapy: combination of appropriate antivirals to decrease viral fitness
Definition of viral fitness
A parameter that quantifies the adaptation of an organism or a virus to a given environment
For a virus, ability to produce infectious progeny relative to a reference viral clone, in a defined environment
Analysis of fitness is a complex matter because of the importance of model used to analyze it
Esteban Domingo, Fields Virology 2007
Treatment begins
Drug-resistant variant
Drug-susceptible virus
Naturally—occurring viral variants
Incomplete suppression Inadequate potency Inadequate drug levels Inadequate adherence Pre-existing HBV DR mt
Time
HB
V r
epli
cati
on
Kinetics of HBV drug resistance emergence
Si Ahmed et al., Hepatology, 2000; Zoulim, AVCC, 2001; Yuen et al., Hepatology, 2001; Locarnini et al ., Antiviral Therapy , 2004
Kinetics of spread and emergence of drug resistant virus during antiviral therapy
• Free liver space
• Mutant fitness
AntiviralAntiviral
II IIII IIIIII IVIV
wtwt mtmt
nini
INHIBITION OF WILD TYPE VIRUS REPLICATIONINHIBITION OF WILD TYPE VIRUS REPLICATION DELAYED EMERGENCE DELAYED EMERGENCE OF OF DRUG RESISTANT VIRUSDRUG RESISTANT VIRUS
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
XXXX
Zhou et al ., AAC, 1999
Clearance of viral infection versus selection of escape mutants
The most important factors to consider:
The rate of immune killing of infected hepatocytes
The rate of replication and spread of mutant virus in the
chronically infected liver (i.e. fitness of the virus: the rate
of spread to uninfected hepatocytes)
Small changes in these factors may have profound effect
on whether treatment response is durable or subject to
rapid rebound
These factors may be subject to therapeutic intervention
Litwin et al, J Clin Virol 2005
Viral fitness as driving force for the emergence of drug resistant mutants?
Virus related
Genome replication capacity of a strain Transcription Packaging and RT
Virion production of a strain
Virion stability outside cells
Infectivity of a strain Entry process Post-entry
Immune-related
Cellular antiviral innate response to infection
Clearance of infected hepatocytes by immune cells
Clearance of virion in the circulation
Therapeutic interventionImmunosupression
Studying viral fitness in vitro
No ideal model to study viral fitness HepaRG and PHH Virus derived from patient versus virus produced in vitro
Disconnection between genome replication, virus assembly, and infectivity
Replication assays (with or without antiviral treatment)
Transfection or tranduction of hepatoma cells Stably transformed cell lines (HepG2.2.15 etc….)
Assembly assays Infectivity assays
Method to study HBV replication capacity
Durantel et al., Hepatology, 2004Durantel et al., J. Clin. Virol. , 2005
Evaluation of drug susceptibility in vitro
Durantel et al., Hepatology, 2004Durantel et al., J. Clin. Virol. , 2005
Longitudinal studies: replication capacity and drug suceptibility of lamivudine-resistant strains
Durantel et al., Hepatology, 2004
Yang et al., Antiviral Res, 2004
Other phenotypic assay
0
20
40
60
80
100
WT NT LMMV LMMVNT
mo
ck
WT
WT NT LMMV LMMVNT
3
2
4
1,5
1,2
kB
4330
7
100
rép
lica
tion
du
VH
B (%
)
NT
LM
MV
VHB EC50 (µM) EC90 (µM)facteur de résistance EC50 (µM) EC90 (µM)
facteur de résistance
WT 0,3 ± 0,09 2,3 ± 1,9 1 5,5 ± 1 52,5 ± 2,5 1NT 0,12 ± 0,03 1,8 ± 1 0,4 9,2 ± 0,8 > 75 1,7LMMV >10 > 10 >33 7,35 ± 1 51,5 ± 8,5 1,3LMMVNT >10 > 10 >33 43 ± 3 > 75 7,8
Lamivudine (LAM) Adéfovir (ADV)
Phenotypic studies with Bac-HBV
Replication capacity
Drug susceptibility
and cross resistance
MockW
TLMMV
NT LMMNNT
Encapsidated intracellular HBV DNA
Lucifora, Durantel et al., JGV, 2008
Relative Replication Yield (RC) of HBV Mutants
R. Edwards, T. Shaw, V. Sozzi & S. Locarnini. 2005. Global Antiviral Journal;1(Suppl2):77
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
L180M+A181V+N236T
A181V+N236TL180M
L180M+T184G+S202I+M204V*
A181V
M250V*M204I
L180M+A181V+M204V
I169T+V173L+L180M+M204V+M250V*N236T
L180M+M204V*
WTA181T+N236T
L180M+A181V
A181T
I169T+V173L+L180M+M204V*V173L+L180M+M204V*
Replication capacity varies with cell type
Brunelle et al, Hepatology, 2005
1 3 6 9 12 days
32
4
1,5
0,5
kB
32
4
1,5
0,5
mo
ck
HepG2
proliferativeHepaRG
3
21,5
dif ferenciatedHepaRG
Lucifora et al, submitted
Antiviral drug potency depends on hepatoma cell type
Seignères et al, Hepatology 2002
Impact of HBV genome background on antiviral drug efficacy and cross-resistance
Villet et al, J Hepatol 2008
Studying viral fitness in vitro
No ideal model to study viral fitness HepaRG and PHH Virus derived from patient versus virus produced in vitro
Disconnection between genome replication, virus assembly, and infectivity
Replication assays (with or without antiviral treatment)
Transfection or tranduction of hepatoma cells Stably transformed cell lines (HepG2.2.15 etc….)
Assembly assays Infectivity assays
Transfected or tranduced cells
Stably-transformed cell lines
HDV particles
HBV pseudoparticles
Models for the production of HBV particles used for assemby and infectivity assays
Transiently transfected versus stably transformed cell line
Transiently-transfected with plasmids or PCR-amplicons
Easier and flexible Cell line can be selected on
choice Less producing cells More non-enveloped
capsids? Lower specific infectivity
Stably-transformed
Work intensive and less flexible
All cells produce Less non-enveloped
capsids? Higher specific infectivity
Production of significant
amount of non-enveloped capsid
Transfection or transduction
Problem of production of non enveloped capsids in transfected/transduced cells
Problem of standardisation
of input for infectivity assay
Interest of stably transformed cell lines
Hepatology , 2008
Studying viral fitness in vitro
No ideal model to study viral fitness HepaRG and PHH Virus derived from patient versus virus produced in vitro
Disconnection between genome replication, virus assembly, and infectivity
Replication assays (with or without antiviral treatment)
Transfection or tranduction of hepatoma cells Stably transformed cell lines (HepG2.2.15 etc….)
Assembly assays Infectivity assays
HDV life cycle
Courtesy from Dr Camille Sureau
Production of HDV and HBV
Huh7
Transfection
Production and secretion of HDV and
HBV
Target Cell
Fixation and internalisation via HBV receptor(s)
HBV or HDV replication quantified by qRT-PCR orSB/NB
HDV
Replication of HDV and HBV genomes &
glycoproteinssynthesis
CMV HDV genome (3x) polyA
Sureau, Curr Top Microbiol Immunol, 2006
Sph I Swa I
Sal I/Xho I
Baculovirus sequences Baculovirus sequencesCMVie enh
Actin promoter
Nsi I
T7terminator
Rabbit globinterminator
HBV 1.1 genome unit
Not I Nco I
C X
Pol
S
Sph I Swa I
Sal I/Xho I
Baculovirus sequences Baculovirus sequencesCMVie enh
Nsi I
T7terminator
Rabbit globinterminator
HBV 1.3 genome unit
Nco I
C X
P
S
Nco I
Pre-C
Pre-C
Pre-CX
EN1 EN2
EN1 EN2DR1
DR1DR2
DR1DR2EN1 EN2 DR1
DR2
TYPE I
TYPE II
HBV
Production of HDV particles without production of HBV
Huh7
CMV HBV large polyA
Transfection
Production and secretion
of HDV
Target Cell
Fixation and internalisation via HBV receptor(s)
HDV replication quantified by qRT-PCR
or Northern blot
HDV
Expression of HBV glycoproteins
Replication of HDV genome
CMV HBV medium polyA
CMV HBV small polyA
CMV HDV genome (3x) polyA
Sureau, Curr Top Microbiol Immunol, 2006
Production of retroviral particles pseudotyped with HBV/DHBV
glycoproteins?
293FT
CMVGag
PolpolyA
CMV CMVU5R
U3 U5R
3’ LTR5’ LTR
CMV HBV large polyA
Transfection
Production and secretion
of HBVpp
Target Cell
Fixation and internalisation
Reporter expression measurement
Biochemical and antigenic studies
HBVpp
Expression of HBV glycoproteins
Luciferase
CMV HBV medium polyA
CMV HBV small polyA
Chai et al., J Virol, 2007 Saha, J Virol, 2005
Studying viral fitness in vitro
No ideal model to study viral fitness HepaRG and PHH Virus derived from patient versus virus produced in vitro
Disconnection between genome replication, virus assembly, and infectivity
Replication assays (with or without antiviral treatment)
Transfection or tranduction of hepatoma cells Stably transformed cell lines (HepG2.2.15 etc….)
Assembly assays Infectivity assays
Primary human hepatocytes
HepaRG cells
Other cell culture models
Models used for infectivity assays
Infection of PHH with HBV
Gripon et al., J Virol, 1988
Model difficult to master Variability from batch to batch
Infection of HepaRG by HBV
Easier to manipulate than PHH Only 10-20 % cells infected Type-I IFN may be responsible for low HBV replication
Gripon et al., J Virol, 1988 Hantz et al., J Gen Virol, 2009 Maire te al., BBRC 2008
1 3 6 9 12 jours
32
4
1,5
0,5
kB
32
4
1,5
0,5
mo
ck
HepG2
HepaRGp
3
21,5
HepaRGd
Encapsidated intracellular HBV DNA
Type-I IFN response restrict HBV replication launched by Bac-HBV in proliferative HepaRG cells
INFR1
Gus β
polyIC : - - + + -
Hep
aR
G
Hep
aR
GshIF
NR
1
Hep
aR
G
Hep
aR
GshIF
NR
1
H20
Encapsidated intracellular HBV DNA RT-PCR
Encapsidated intracellular HBV DNA
Lucifora, Durantel et al., submitted
1 3 6 9 12
0Bac-HBV-WT :
joursmo
ck
1 3 6 9 12
0 + 3
mo
ck
1 3 6 9 12
0
mo
ck
1 3 6 9 12
0 + 3
mo
ck
jours
3
2
4
1,5
kB
HepaRG HepaRG shIFNR1
M J1 J3 J6 M J1 J3 J6Transduction Infection
M J1 J3 J6 J9 J1 J3 J6 J9
Ac anti-IFNß
+-
M J1 J3 J6 J9 M J1 J3 J6 J9
- +
Immunofluorescence
Other cell systems ?
Total DNAEncaps DNA
RT-PCR
Animal model to study viral fitness
Kremsdorf and Brezillon, WJG, 2007
Chimpanzee to study viral fitness ??
Hepatology , 2009
Why studying viral fitness
Understand mechanism of emergence of drug-resistant strain
Determine whether a strain can propagate
Better monitoring and prediction of emergence
Define strategy for therapy: combination of appropriate antivirals to decrease viral fitness
Study of viral fitness in vitro to get insight on the emergence of mutants in vivo: an example
Villet et al., Gastroenterology, 2006 and 2009
Genotypic and viral quasispecies studies
Longitudinal studies: replication capacity and drug suceptibility of multiresistant strains
WT mut-3 mut-2 mut-1 mut-4
The selected mutant replicates better in presence of drugs
Replication capacity and magnitude of
resistance to AV are not the only factors
In vivo selected mutant is better produced in vitro
HBV transfection HBV/HDV transfection
In vivo selected mutant is more infectious in vitro
Conclusions
Among the four resistance mutants, the mutant that presented: • The strongest resistance to antivirals
• The best secretion of HBsAg and Dane particles
• The highest infectivity
…was finally selected and became dominant
Why studying viral fitness
Understand mechanism of emergence of drug-resistant strain
Determine whether a strain can propagate
Better monitoring and prediction of emergence
Define strategy for therapy: combination of appropriate antivirals to decrease viral fitness
Acknowledgements
Liver department
F ZoulimC. TrépoPh. MerleF. Bailly
P. MiailhesM. MaynardC. FournierS. Si Ahmed
INSERM U871
S. VilletC. PichoudF. Lavocat
R. EgounletyG. BillioudJ. Lucifora
M. A GoughoulteP. DenyO. Hantz
D. DurantelS. Durantel
MN Brunelle
Collaborations
K. Lacombe, ParisJ.P. Villeneuve, Montreal
P. Lampertico, MilanS. Locarnini, Australia
H. Wedemeyer, HannoverJ. Petersen, HamburgT. Santantonio, Bari
J. Neyts, LeuvenM. Levrero, RomaM. Buti, Barcelona