firms perception of business tendency surveys · 2017. 1. 27. · outline . 3 aim and development...

55
Klaus Abberger, Matthias Banner, Andreas Dibiasi 15. November 2013 FirmsPerception of Business Tendency Surveys Results from a meta survey in the services sector

Upload: others

Post on 02-Feb-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Klaus Abberger, Matthias Banner, Andreas Dibiasi

    15. November 2013

    Firms’ Perception of

    Business Tendency Surveys Results from a meta survey in the services sector

  • 2

    Outline

    Introduction

    Survey details

    The questionnaire

    Selected results

    Who and how?

    Business situation

    Capacity utilization

    Shortage of qualified labour

    Perception of business tendency surveys

    Summary

    Outline

  • 3

    Aim and development

    Meta survey to get insight into the

    structure of respondents

    Response behaviour

    perception of business tendency survey by respondents

    perception and response behaviour to selected business tendency

    questions

    Target sector: Services with a subdivision into hotels/restaurants and other

    services

    Questionnaire was pretested in various personal interviews with regular

    respondents of tendency surveys

    Introduction

  • 4

    Survey details

    Field period: between 10. June and 31. August 2013

    Responses: 1726

    Response rate: 64%

    Introduction

  • 5 5

    Questionnaire

  • 6 6

    Selected results

  • 7 7

    Who and how?

  • Who?

    8

    Selected results

    Other

    Administrator

    Departmental head

    Owner/manager/board member

    0 300 600 900

    Person to complete the survey (DLU)

  • Who?

    9

    Selected results

    Other

    Administrator

    Departmental head

    Owner/manager/board member

    0 100 200 300 400

    Person to complete the survey (GGU)

  • Who?

    10

    Selected results

    Procurement

    Sales

    Statistics

    Marketing

    Other

    Staff Position

    Controlling

    Accounts

    Management

    0 300 600 900

    Department responsible for KOF− Surveys (DLU)

  • Who?

    11

    Selected results

    Procurement

    Marketing

    Controlling

    Other

    Staff Position

    Sales

    Statistics

    Accounts

    Management

    0 100 200 300 400

    Department responsible for KOF− Surveys (GGU)

  • How?

    12

    Selected results

    no Answer

    ...answered when a reminder is received

    ...answered just before the deadline for submission

    ...answered when time permits

    ...answerd immediatly after receiving

    0 200 400 600

    KOF Business Tendency Surveys are usually.... (DLU)

  • How?

    13

    Selected results

    no Answer

    ...answered when a reminder is received

    ...answered just before the deadline for submission

    ...answered when time permits

    ...answerd immediatly after receiving

    0 50 100 150 200

    KOF Business Tendency Surveys are usually.... (GGU)

  • How?

    14

    Selected results

    no Answer

    more than three

    three

    two

    one

    0 250 500 750 1000

    Number of people involved (DLU)

  • How?

    15

    Selected results

    no Answer

    more than three

    three

    two

    one

    0 100 200 300 400

    Number of people involved (GGU)

  • How?

    16

    Selected results

    no Answer

    >60

  • How?

    17

    Selected results

    no Answer

    >60

  • 18 18

    Business situation

  • Business situation

    19

    Selected results

    Inventory

    Other

    Customer frequency

    General sentiment in the sector/overall economy

    Incoming orders

    Enquiries/offers

    Quantity of sales/volume

    Liquidity

    Cost situation

    Corporate earnings/margin

    Turnover

    0 300 600 900

    important rather important neutral rather insignificant insignificant no answer

    Assessment of Business Situation DLU

  • Business situation

    20

    Selected results

    Inventory

    Other

    General sentiment in the sector/overall economy

    Incoming orders

    Liquidity

    Enquiries/offers

    Quantity of sales/volume

    Cost situation

    Corporate earnings/margin

    Customer frequency

    Turnover

    0 100 200 300 400

    important rather important neutral rather insignificant insignificant no answer

    Assessment of Business Situation GGU

  • Seasonal adjustment

    21

    Selected results

    Other

    Elimination of seasonal fluctuations not possible or feasible

    Empirical values

    Comparison with average trends in the same months of previous years

    Comparison with previous year

    0 300 600 900

    Elimination of seasonal fluctuations (DLU)

  • Seasonal adjustment

    22

    Selected results

    Other

    Empirical values

    Elimination of seasonal fluctuations not possible or feasible

    Comparison with average trends in the same months of previous years

    Comparison with previous year

    0 100 200 300 400

    Elimination of seasonal fluctuations (GGU)

  • Business Expectations

    Macroeconomic imports / exports

    Macroeconomic domestic production / investment

    Trends in household earnings /labour market situation

    Economic forecasts for our sector / for the overall economy

    Political/general legal framework

    General sentiment in the sector / overall economy

    General sentiment in the client sector

    Factors/indicators of own business

    0 300 600 900

    important rather important neutral rather insignificant insignificant no answer

    Assessment of Business Expectations DLU

    23

  • Business Expectations

    24

    Macroeconomic imports / exports

    Macroeconomic domestic production / investment

    Political/general legal framework

    Trends in household earnings /labour market situation

    Economic forecasts for our sector / for the overall economy

    General sentiment in the sector / overall economy

    General sentiment in the client sector

    Factors/indicators of own business

    0 100 200 300 400

    important rather important neutral rather insignificant insignificant no answer

    Assessment of Business Expec tations GGU

  • 25 25

    Capacity utilization

  • Factors for assessing capacity utilization

    26

    Selected results

    licenses

    other

    material consump.

    area

    capital

    tech. capacity

    customer freq.

    prod. per employee

    employees

    working hours

    0 300 600 900

    important rather important neutral rather insignificant insignificant no answer

    Capacity Utilisation DLU

  • Factors for assessing capacity utilization

    27

    Selected results

    licenses

    other

    tech. capacity

    capital

    area

    material consump.

    working hours

    prod. per employee

    employees

    customer freq.

    0 100 200 300 400

    important rather important neutral rather insignificant insignificant no answer

    Capacity Utilisation GGU

  • Relevance continuous

    17494216%84%

    0

    300

    600

    900

    Irrelevant Relevant

    Question is irrelevant for our company Continuous Capacity Utilization DLU

    Klaus Abberger 28

  • Relevance continuous

    Klaus Abberger 29

    6138614%86%

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    Irrelevant Relevant

    Question is irrelevant for our company Continuous Capacity Utilization GGU

  • Relevance categorical (personnel and technical)

    Klaus Abberger 30

    12199411%89%

    0

    300

    600

    900

    Irrelevant Relevant

    Question is irrelevant for our company Categorial Capacity Utilization DLU

  • Relevance categorical (personnel and technical)

    Klaus Abberger 31

    7237516%84%

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    Irrelevant Relevant

    Question is irrelevant for our company Categorial Capacity Utilization personal factors GGU

  • Relevance categorical (personnel)

    Klaus Abberger 32

    13897712%88%

    0

    300

    600

    900

    Irrelevant Relevant

    Question is irrelevant for our company Categorial Capacity Utilization personal factors DLU

  • Relevance categorical (personnel)

    Klaus Abberger 33

    7836917%83%

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    Irrelevant Relevant

    Question is irrelevant for our company Categor ial Capacity Utilization personal factors GGU

  • Relevance categorical (technical)

    Klaus Abberger 34

    44567040%60%

    0

    300

    600

    900

    Irrelevant Relevant

    Question is irrelevant for our company Categor ial Capacity Utilization technical factors DLU

  • Relevance categorical (technical)

    Klaus Abberger 35

    14530232%68%

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    Irrelevant Relevant

    Question is irrelevant for our company Categor ial Capacity Utilization technical factors GGU

  • Capacity utilization, categorical, personnel

    0

    100

    200

    40 60 80 100 120

    co

    un

    t

    0 100 200density

    Histogram Categorial CU DLU(only personal−related capacity)

    Klaus Abberger 36

  • Capacity utilization, categorical, technical

    Klaus Abberger 37

    0

    50

    100

    150

    40 60 80 100 120

    co

    un

    t

    0 4080120160density

    Histogram Categorial CU DLU(only non−personnel−related, technical capacity)

  • Capacity utilization, categorical, personnel

    Klaus Abberger 38

    0

    25

    50

    75

    100

    40 60 80 100 120

    co

    un

    t

    0 255075100density

    Histogram Categorial CU GGU(only personal−related capacity)

  • Capacity utilization, categorical, technical

    Klaus Abberger 39

    0

    20

    40

    60

    40 60 80 100 120

    co

    un

    t

    0 20 40 60density

    Histogram Categorial CU GGU(only non−personnel−related, technical capacity)

  • Capacity utilization, categorical, average

    Klaus Abberger 40

    0

    100

    200

    300

    40 60 80 100 120

    co

    un

    t

    0 100 200density

    Histogram Categorial CU DLU (average)

  • Capacity utilization, continuous

    41

    Selected results

    0

    100

    200

    0 30 60 90

    co

    un

    t

    0 100 200density

    Histogram Continuous CU DLU(with companies that cannot cope an increase in demand)

  • Capacity utilization, difference

    0

    30

    60

    90

    0 50

    co

    un

    t

    0 30 60 90density

    Diffrence in Capacity UtilizationCategorial and Continous questioning DLU

    Klaus Abberger 42

  • Capacity utilization, categorical, average

    Klaus Abberger 43

    0

    25

    50

    75

    100

    40 60 80 100 120

    co

    un

    t

    0 25 50 75100density

    Histogram Categorial CU GGU (average)

  • Capacity utilization, continuous

    44

    Selected results

    0

    50

    100

    40 60 80 100

    co

    un

    t

    0 255075100125density

    Histogram Continuous CU GGU(with companies that cannot cope an increase in demand)

  • Capacity utlizitaion, difference

    Klaus Abberger 45

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    −20 0 20 40

    co

    un

    t

    0 10203040density

    Diffrence in Capacity UtilizationCategorial and Continous questioning GGU

  • 46 46

    Shortage of qualified labour

  • A problem?

    47

    Selected results

    455638

    23

    41%57%

    2%

    0

    300

    600

    900

    Yes No no Answer

    Staff Shortage DLU

  • A problem?

    48

    Selected results

    114322

    11

    26%72%

    2%

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    Yes No no Answer

    Staff Shortage GGU

  • Kind of problem?

    49

    Selected results

    ...the excessive costs of employing staff with relevant qualifications

    ...the lack of availability of staff with relevant qualifications

    0 300 600 900

    If there were problems recruiting suitably qualified staff, this was attributable to... (DLU)

  • Kind of problem?

    50

    Selected results

    ...the excessive costs of employing staff with relevant qualifications

    ...the lack of availability of staff with relevant qualifications

    0 100 200 300 400

    If there were problems recruiting suitably qualified staff, this was attributable to... (GGU)

  • 51 51

    Perception of business tendency surveys

  • Interesting?

    52

    Selected results

    70

    267

    431

    215

    11221

    (6%)

    (24%)

    (39%)

    (19%)

    (10%)(2%)

    0

    300

    600

    900

    important rather important neutral rather insignificant insignificant no answer

    Significance of Business Tendency Surveys DLU

  • Interesting?

    53

    Selected results

    55

    135

    161

    53

    349

    (12%)

    (30%)

    (36%)

    (12%)

    (8%)(2%)

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    important rather important neutral rather insignificant insignificant no answer

    Significance of Business Tendency Surveys GGU

  • 54 54

    Summary

  • 55

    Summary

    Often survey respondents are managers and they need mostly not more than 15 minutes for the questionnaire

    Turnover and profits are important factors for the assessment of the business situation

    Factor within the own business are most important for the assessment of the business expectations

    Capacity utilization in the services sector is strongly connected to personnel factors

    Summary