final week report (lfs1827)

44
Indian Academy of Sciences, Bangalore Indian National Academy of Sciences, New Delhi The National Academy of Sciences India, Allahabad SUMMER RESEARCH FELLOWSHIPS 2015 Format for the final Report* Name of the candidate : SAI PREETHI NAKKINA Application Registration no. : LFS1827 Date of joining : 27-05-2015 Date of completion : 22-07-2015 Total no. of days worked : 57 Name of the guide : Prof. ANUPAM DIKSHIT Guide’s institution : UNIVERSITY OF ALLAHABAD Project title : In Vitro Study of Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activity of Some Secondary Metabolites of Selected Plants Address with pin code to which the certificate could be sent: SAI KRUPA, #204, 9 TH A MAIN, 1 ST BLOCK, KALYAN NAGAR, BANASWADI, HRBR LAYOUT, BANGALORE- 560043 E-mail ID: [email protected] Phone No: 080-25425327 TA Form attached with final report : YES ________ NO ________ If, NO, Please specify reason Signature of the candidate Signature of the guide Date: 23-07-2015 Date: 23-07-2015 *The final report could be anywhere between 20 and 25 pages including tables, figures etc. This format should be the first page of the report and should be stapled with the main report. (For office use only; do not fill/tear) Candidate’s name: Fellowship amount: Student: Teacher: Deduction: Guide’s name: TA fare: KVPY Fellow: INSPIRE Fellow: Amount to be paid: Others A/c holder’s name: IMPORTANT NOTES: A soft copy of this report should be uploaded in the online page of our website by making use of the userid/password provided to you.

Upload: sai-preethi-nakkina

Post on 23-Jan-2018

108 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Final week report (LFS1827)

Indian Academy of Sciences, Bangalore Indian

National Academy of Sciences, New Delhi

The National Academy of Sciences India, Allahabad

SUMMER RESEARCH FELLOWSHIPS — 2015

Format for the final Report*

Name of the candidate : SAI PREETHI NAKKINA

Application Registration no. : LFS1827

Date of joining : 27-05-2015

Date of completion : 22-07-2015

Total no. of days worked : 57

Name of the guide : Prof. ANUPAM DIKSHIT

Guide’s institution : UNIVERSITY OF ALLAHABAD

Project title : In Vitro Study of Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activity of Some

Secondary Metabolites of Selected Plants

Address with pin code to which the certificate could be sent:

SAI KRUPA, #204, 9TH A MAIN, 1ST BLOCK, KALYAN NAGAR, BANASWADI, HRBR LAYOUT, BANGALORE- 560043

E-mail ID: [email protected]

Phone No: 080-25425327

TA Form attached with final report : YES ________ NO ________ If, NO, Please specify reason

Signature of the candidate Signature of the guide

Date: 23-07-2015 Date: 23-07-2015 *The final report could be anywhere between 20 and 25 pages including tables, figures etc.

This format should be the first page of the report and should be stapled with the main report.

(For office use only; do not fill/tear)

Candidate’s name: Fellowship amount:

Student: Teacher: Deduction:

Guide’s name: TA fare:

KVPY Fellow: INSPIRE Fellow: Amount to be paid:

Others A/c holder’s name: IMPORTANT NOTES: A soft copy of this report should be uploaded in the online page of our website by making use of the userid/password

provided to you.

Page 2: Final week report (LFS1827)
Page 3: Final week report (LFS1827)

UNIVERSITY OF ALLAHABAD …: +91-532-2546200,(R), Tele fax: 2461887(O)(A Central University Under the Act of Parliament) 09453254221; 09335108519(Mobile)D E P A R T M E N T O F B O T A N Y Email: [email protected]

BIOLOGICAL PRODUCT LABORATORY Allahabad-211002, IndiaResidence: A-307, Sai Nilayam, Mehdauri Avas Vikas Colony, Teliarganj, Allahabad-211 002

Professor Anupam Dikshit Date: 22.07.2015M.Sc. D.Ph., Ph.D., FPSI, FBS, F.N.A.Sc.

Head, Department of BotanyCoordinator, Environmental SciencesMember- IPR Centre

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN

This is to certify that Ms. SAI PREETHI NAKKINA, B.Tech., BIOTECHNOLOGY,

5th Semester, student of PES Institute of Technology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, completed her

project work entitled, “IN VITRO STUDY OF ANTIMICROBIAL AND ANTIOXIDANT

ACTIVITY OF SOME SECONDARY METABOLITES OF SELECTED PLANTS” in the

Biological Product Laboratory, Department of Botany, University of Allahabad, Allahabad

(U.P.) during the period from 27th May 2015 to 21st July 2015 as Summer Research Fellow

(LFS1827) of Science Academies’. It is further certified that, the matter embodied in the report

has not been submitted by any one previously to the best of my knowledge. She is enthusiastic,

diligent and dedicated to her work. The candidate has potential and research aptitude. I wish her

all the success in her career.

(Anupam Dikshit)Supervisor

Page 4: Final week report (LFS1827)

Dedication Page

I would like to dedicate the project to my beloved parents and sister.

Page 5: Final week report (LFS1827)

Acknowledgments

Firstly, I would like to thank The Indian Sciences Academies’ for offering summer fellowships

and providing a wonderful opportunity for students to move ahead in their research career.

My sincere thanks goes to my guide, Prof. Anupam Dikshit (FNASc.), Biological Product

Laboratory, Head of Department, Department of Botany, University of Allahabad for selecting

me and providing his laboratory facilities to carry out my work. I am extremely grateful for his

guidance and support throughout my stay in Allahabad. This work would not have been possible

without his valuable guidance, support and endless encouragement.

I am thankful to Dr. Rohit Kumar Mishra, Research Scientist, for providing help in initiating my

work and his support in various ways.

My special thanks to Mr. Ashutosh Pathak, Research Scholar, Biological Product Laboratory,

Department of Botany, University of Allahabad, because of whom my project work has been one

that I will cherish forever. He supported and guided me in all stages of my work.

My heartiest thanks to all the research scholars of the Biological Product Laboratory, Dr. Anand

Pandey, Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Mr. Shashi Kant Shukla, Mrs. Madhu Pandey, Ms. Afifa Qidwai and

Mrs. Manisha Pandey for treating me well. Their support during my stay and inputs regarding

my work have been invaluable. I would also like to thank Mr. Raghuraj Pratap “Raghu Bhaiya”

for his kind co-operation and help during my work.

Words seem to be limiting to thank my parents Mr. Venkata R K Nakkina, Mrs. Lakshmi

Padmaja Nakkina, my dearest sister Sai Shruthi Nakkina, and all my family members for their

love and support without which this work would not have been possible.

I would also like to thank my relatives, friends and well wishers who have helped me directly

and indirectly in every step of the way.

Finally, I thank the Almighty God for helping surpass all the trials and helping me pursue this

study.

(Sai Preethi Nakkina)

Page 6: Final week report (LFS1827)

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

ml -------------------- milliliter

cm -------------------- centimeter

mg -------------------- milligram

hrs -------------------- Hour

mg/ml -------------------- milligram per milliliter

MIC -------------------- Minimum Inhibitory Concentration

i.e. -------------------- id est; that is

⁰C -------------------- degree Celsius

appox. -------------------- Approximately

CFU -------------------- Colony Forming Unit

IC₅₀ -------------------- Half Maximal Inhibitory Concentration

µl -------------------- microliter

CLSI --------------------- Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute

DPPH -------------------- Di-phenyl Picryl hydrazine

EC50 ---------------------- Concentration at which 50% of DPPH was used

Page 7: Final week report (LFS1827)

Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 1

1.1 Antimicrobial Assays .......................................................................................................................... 1

1.1.1 Microbes: Omnipotent in environment ........................................................................................ 1

1.1.2 Pathogens: Bacteria and Fungus ................................................................................................. 2

1.1.3 Antibiotics: Related concerns ...................................................................................................... 2

1.1.4 Complementary and Alternative sources: Plant Extracts ............................................................ 4

1.2 Antioxidant Assay ............................................................................................................................... 5

1.2.1 Free radicals ................................................................................................................................ 5

1.2.2 Antioxidants ................................................................................................................................. 6

2. REVIEW OF LITERATURE ........................................................................................................................ 7

2.1 Antimicrobial activity of Plant Extracts .............................................................................................. 7

2.2 Antioxidant activity of Plant Extracts ................................................................................................. 8

3. MATERIALS AND METHODS ................................................................................................................ 11

3.1 Place and Duration of Study ............................................................................................................. 11

3.2 Materials ........................................................................................................................................... 11

3.2.1 Culture Media Used: Name and Composition ........................................................................... 11

3.2.2 Chemical Agents ........................................................................................................................ 12

3.2.3 Microbial Strains ....................................................................................................................... 13

3.2.4 Laboratory Equipment ............................................................................................................... 13

3.2.5 Extracts/Compounds/oil ............................................................................................................. 14

3.3 Methods............................................................................................................................................. 14

3.3.1 Cleaning of Glass Equipment .................................................................................................... 14

3.3.2 Washing ...................................................................................................................................... 15

3.3.3 Sterilization ................................................................................................................................ 15

3.3.4 Antifungal assay ......................................................................................................................... 16

3.3.5 Antibacterial assay ..................................................................................................................... 17

3.4 Extraction of Trachyspermum ammi Oil ........................................................................................... 18

3.4.1 Determination of Scavenging Activity of Oils and Plant Extracts by DPPH Assay .................. 18

4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION .................................................................................................................. 19

4.1 Antibacterial tests .............................................................................................................................. 19

4.1.1 Gentamicin ................................................................................................................................. 19

4.1.2 BPL-11 ...................................................................................................................................... 19

4.1.3 BPL-14 ...................................................................................................................................... 20

4.1.4 BPL-16 ...................................................................................................................................... 21

Page 8: Final week report (LFS1827)

4.2 Antifungal tests ................................................................................................................................. 22

4.2.1 BPL-Ua ...................................................................................................................................... 22

4.2.2 Sertaconazole NitrateBP ............................................................................................................ 23

4.3 Percent Yield of Trachyspermum ammi essential oil ........................................................................ 24

4.4 Antioxidant tests ............................................................................................................................... 25

4.4.1 Vitamin C ................................................................................................................................... 25

4.4.2 Trachyspermum ammi ................................................................................................................ 25

4.4.3BPL-Ua ....................................................................................................................................... 26

4.4.4 BPL-Ma ..................................................................................................................................... 26

4.4.5 BPL-Pn ...................................................................................................................................... 27

5. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE PROSPECTS ............................................................................................. 28

6. BIBLIOGRAPHY .................................................................................................................................... 29

Page 9: Final week report (LFS1827)

1

1. INTRODUCTION

During the past decade, Plant products have been reported as to possess antibacterial,

antifungal, antiviral, insecticidal and antioxidant properties (Kordali et al., 2005; Sylvestre et al.,

2006). Utilization expanding from cancer treatment, food preservation, aroma therapy to

fragrance industries, they are a rich source of biologically active compounds (Faid et al., 1995;

Buttner et al., 1996; Van de Braak et al., 1999; Milhau et al., 1997). To evaluate newer plant

extracts for antimicrobial and antioxidant activity is reasonable having witnessed a large number

of reports regarding the same (Darokar et al., 1998; Martini et al., 1998).

1.1 Antimicrobial Assays

1.1.1 Microbes: Omnipotent in environment

Micro-organisms are living forms too small to be seen clearly with the naked eye and

lack highly differentiated cells and distinct tissues. They comprise of organisms living not only

in the ocean and soil but also human bodies and play important roles in the recycle of nutrients,

degradation of toxins and the maintenance of human health (Figure 1) (Okeke et al., 2005; Bryce

1992).

Figure 1: Cosmopolitan distribution of microbes.

They are plenteous natural sources of around 23000 unmatchable secondary metabolites

with biological activities, many commercialized. Firstly antibacterial, antifungals, antiprotozoal

as well as antivirals; secondly, pharmacological agents showing important activities as

Page 10: Final week report (LFS1827)

2

antitumor, immune modulators, neurological agents and enzyme inhibitors; thirdly, as agro

biological comprising insecticides, pesticides and herbicides and fourthly, compounds with

regulatory activities (Berdy, 2005; Duraipandiyan et al., 2010; Zotchev 2011; Finch 1998).

Hence, one can conclude that Microorganisms are closely associated with the health and welfare

of human beings, of which many are beneficial. However, many are detrimental (Dismukes,

2006; Gibbons, 2005).

1.1.2 Pathogens: Bacteria and Fungus

Human microbe interactions are beneficial as well as sometimes harmful to the human

health. The host–micro biota interactions being the beneficial ones pathogen-host interaction

results in host damage (Brodsky and Medzhitov, 2009). Specific virulence factors manipulating

host molecular activity is a result of host–pathogen interactions further causing responses from

the host, including the production of antibacterial factors by the mammalian innate immune

system (Diacovich and Gorvel, 2010; Hammer et al., 1999). Even after the extensive progress in

medical sciences, infectious diseases caused by bacteria, fungi, viruses and parasites are still a

leading cause of worldwide morbidity and mortality, causing approximately one-half of all

deaths and that of up to 3 million pre-school children each year (Farthing and Kelly, 2007;

Graser et al., 2000). They have their largest impact in the developing world due to relative

unavailability of medicines and the emergence of widespread drug resistance (Anonymous,

2011; Curtis, 1998).

Due to the genetic ability of microbes, they transmit resistance against present antibiotics.

Because of treatment using the same routinely used drugs, reports state that micro-organism have

become multi resistant to other medications available in the market. To tackle the same, in recent

year’s researcher and pharmaceutical companies have been motivated to develop new

antimicrobial (Sakagami and Kajimura, 2002; Thomashow et al., 1997).

1.1.3 Antibiotics: Related concerns

An antimicrobial agent is a compound that kills or inhibits the growth of microbes such

as bacteria and fungi (Li et al., 2008). Chemically, antibiotics are heterogeneous group of

organic, low-molecular weight compounds produced by microorganisms that are deleterious to

the growth or metabolic activities of other microorganisms (Kamali and Amir, 2010).

In the 20th Century, Antibiotics are undeniably one of the most important therapeutic

discoveries and with advancement in field of medicine, remarkable progress has been made with

Page 11: Final week report (LFS1827)

3

the discoveries of many natural and synthetic drugs. However, only one third of the infectious

diseases known have been treated from these synthetic products. Regrettably, widespread

indiscriminate use, incessant overuse, underuse and general misuse of antibiotics are major

factors in the emergence and dissemination of resistance (Westh et al., 2004; Moellering et al.,

2007; Maisnier-Patin and Andersson, 2004).

The concept of drug resistance is more complex than it seems. Microbial susceptibility is

a continuum that reflects phenotypic and genotypic variations in natural microbial populations

(Andersson and Hughes, 2010). Microbial resistance to antimicrobials may occur through the

emergence of pre-existing but previously unexpressed resistance phenotypes or through inherent

insusceptibility to antibiotics as a consequence of general adaptive processes. However, the most

commonly described form of bacterial resistance occurs either by genomic mutation or through

the acquisition of new genetic information encoding for resistance elements (Wright, 2005;

Gilbert et al., 2002; Simoes et al., 2008; Brehm-Stecher and Johnson, 2003; Kumar and

Schweizer, 2005). The major mechanisms of bacterial resistance to antimicrobials are

demonstrated in Figure 2 and include drug inactivation, target modification, alteration in the

accessibility to the target through drug efflux and decreased uptake (Wright, 2005; Simoes et al.,

2008; Dantas et al., 2008; Abreu et al., 2012; Jagessar et al. 2008).

Figure 2: Mechanisms of resistance to antimicrobials: active drug efflux systems from the cell via a

collection of membrane-associated pumping proteins that effectively remove toxic compounds from cells;

mutations resulting in altered cell permeability; enzymatic degradation of antimicrobials by the synthesis

Page 12: Final week report (LFS1827)

4

of modifying- or inactivating-enzymes that selectively target and destroy these compounds;

alteration/modification of the target site (Abreu et al., 2012).

As a result of the alarming rate of appearance and emergence of multidrug resistant

strains, especially by bacteria and fungi, treatment failures are still the major cause of morbidity

and mortality worldwide (Kuete, 2013; Goossens, 2005; Prashant et al., 2006). Treatment of

infectious diseases with antimicrobial agents continues to present problems not only as resistance

towards them but also toxicity and many common side effects (Iwu et al., 1999; Kunin, 1993;

Burt, 2004; Martini and Eloff, 1998), thus limiting the uses of conventional antimicrobial agents

due to their common side effects such as hepatotoxicity, nausea, diarrhea and impotency (Milhau

et al., 1997; Nascimento et al., 2000). The situation is alarming in developing as well as

developed countries. Therefore, alternative antimicrobial strategies are urgently needed, leading

to a re-evaluation of the therapeutic use of ancient remedies, such as plants (Mandal et al., 2010;

Basualdo et al., 2007).

1.1.4 Complementary and Alternative sources: Plant Extracts

Many reports reveal use of these plants by the local tribal people, from ancient time

(Subashkumar et al., 2013; Kunin, 1993). Traced as far back as the beginning of human

civilization, earliest being those found in “Rigveda”, written between 4500 - 1600 B.C, tells

Ayurveda, the foundation of medicinal science being purely based on plants as medicines

(Cowan, 1999). Plant extract, the richest resource of drugs of traditional systems of medicine,

modern medicines, nutraceuticals, food supplements, folk medicines, pharmaceutical

intermediates and chemical entities for synthetic drugs has a potential application as natural

medicine and to treat diseases as well as the microbiological safety of the human health

(Gibbons, 2005; Burt, 2004; Rastogi and Mehrotra, 2002).

In Ayurveda and Homeopathic sciences plant extracts are used extensively, similarly they

are also used for extraction of pharmacological medicines (Murugesan et al., 2011;

Ahameethunisa and Hooper, 2010; Robbers et al., 1996). From about 250 to 500 thousand plant

species are estimated to exist on the planet, several are used for the treatment of various ailments

ranging from minor infections to dysentery, skin diseases, asthma, malaria and a horde of other

infections. However, this constitutes only 1 and 10% of the overall species opening ample scope

Page 13: Final week report (LFS1827)

5

to search for newer and better plants which are yet to be explored (Watve et al., 2001;

Nascimento et al., 2000).

Plants species have pharmacological properties as they possess various secondary

metabolites like glycosides, saponins, flavonoids, steroids, tannins, alkaloids, tirpenes which

have antimicrobial properties (Lalitha et al., 2010; Hussain et al., 2011; Enne et al., 2001).

According to World Health Organization’s report plants have long been used as the primary

source for human treatment by approximately 80% of the world population. These traditional

medicine practices of using extracts of different plant species demonstrates the presence of

antibacterial and antifungal agents (Anonymous, 1993; McGaw et al., 2000; McGaw et al., 2001;

Masoko et al., 2005; Masoko and Eloff, 2005; Casadevall and Pirofski, 2000; Schelz et al.,

2010). Also, the antimicrobial proprieties of various plant extracts against certain pathogen have

primary benefit of being relatively safer and reliable, good therapeutic benefit, and helpful in

overcoming the resistance problems besides affordable treatment (Papadoupoulo et al., 2005;

Elakkia and Venkatesalu, 2013; Sibaram et al., 2012; Finch, 1998).

1.2 Antioxidant Assay

1.2.1 Free radicals

In the recent decades there has been a surge of interest in disease prevention, particularly

the area pertaining to the role of oxygen-free radicals, commonly known as “reactive oxygen

species (ROS)” and “reactive nitrogen species (RNS)” (Halliwell and Gutteridge, 1999;

Devasagayam et al., 2004). A free radical is any molecular species that is capable of independent

existence and contains an unpaired electron in an atomic orbital (Halliwell and Gutteridge,

1989). Free radicals have very brief periods, with half-lives in milli-, micro- or nano seconds

(Devasagayam et al., 2004). Production of free radicals occurs as a part of normal cellular

function, in all cells (Young and Woodside, 2001). Production of free radicals also occurs as a

deleterious effect of irradiation by UV light, X-rays and by gamma-rays (Gilbert, 1981; Cadenas,

1989; Fang et al., 2002). ROS and RNS are well recognized for playing a dual role in biological

systems (Kohen and Nyska, 2002; Valko et al., 2006; Valko et al., 2004). At lower

concentrations ROS show beneficial effects and act as signaling molecules, mediating cell

growth and differentiation (Valko et al., 2006; Valko et al., 2007). However, at higher

concentrations, they induce senescence and apoptosis (Chandra et al., 2000). They can cause cell

damage, also referred to as oxidative stress (Poli et al., 2004). Examples of free radicals include

Page 14: Final week report (LFS1827)

6

superoxide, peroxyl, alkoxyl, trichloromethyl and hydrogen peroxide (Pier-Giorgio, 2000;

Halliwell et al., 1992; Blokhina et al., 2003).

1.2.2 Antioxidants

Antioxidants are any substances which neutralize free radicals. An antioxidant can be

defined as: “any substance that, when present in low concentrations compared to that of an

oxidisable substrate, significantly delays or inhibits the oxidation of that substrate” (Halliwell

and Gutteridge, 1995). The deleterious effects of ROS are neutralized by the antioxidant action

of non-enzymatic antioxidants in addition to antioxidant enzymes (Halliwell, 1994). Cells

possess antioxidant defense systems to counteract oxidative damage from ROS (Halliwell and

Gutteridge, 1999; Halliwell, 1994). It has been long established that oxidative stress, which is

caused by free radicals, is a key component in numerous human diseases, tumor development, as

well as ageing (Ziech et al., 2010; Valko et al., 2006; Franco et al., 2008; Halliwell and

Gutteridge, 1997; Harman, 1956). A large body of literature is in favor of the idea that diet-

derived antioxidants may be useful radioprotectors and play an important role in helping us to

stay healthier for longer (Fang et al., 2002; Halliwell, 1996). Since the percentage of people who

eat the recommended five servings of fruits and vegetables per day, is low, the opportunity for

preventing oxidative damage by improving diet is great (Ames et al., 1993). Foods with

characteristic red and blue colors, such as berries and certain vegetables, have been known for

their excellent antioxidant properties (Hammerstone et al., 2000; Carando et al., 1999; Hara et

al., 1995; Kreft et al., 1999; Rousseff et al., 1987; Reinli and Block, 1996). Data shows that diets

rich in fruits and vegetables show decreased risks for cancer (Seifried et al., 2007).

1.2.3 Antioxidants from Natural extracts

Certain spices and spice extracts have been known for their antioxidant effect (Gerhardt and

Schroter, 1983). A number of components with antioxidant properties have been identified, from

several spices (Halliwell, 1996). Over the last decade, increasing restriction in the use of

synthetic antioxidants has increased interest in the study of natural antioxidants, particularly

those present in spices (Helle et al., 1996). The antioxidant activities of spices suggest that they

possess potential health benefits apart from imparting flavor to the food (Shobana et al., 2000).

Page 15: Final week report (LFS1827)

7

2. REVIEW OF LITERATURE

2.1 Antimicrobial activity of Plant Extracts

The roots, leaves and stalk extracts of Rheum ribes showed significant antibacterial activities

suggesting their effective use against clinical isolates (Bibi et al., 2005).

Hydroalcoholic extracts of eight species of medicinal plants, namely, Acokanthera schimperi

(Apocynaceae), Calpurnia aurea (Leguminosae), Kalanchoe petitiana (Crassulaceae), Lippia

adoensis (Verbenaceae), Malva parviflora (Malvaceae), Olinia rochetiana (Oliniaceae),

Phytolacca dodecandra (Phytolaccaceae) and Verbascum sinaiticum (Scrophulariaceae),

were screened for antimicrobial activity. The results indicated the potential of these herbal

drugs in treating microbial infections (Hailu et al., 2005).

Twelve medicinal plants were screened, namely Abrus precatorius L., Caesalpinia

pulcherrima Swartz., Cardiospermum halicacabum L., Casuarina equisetifolia L., Cynodon

dactylon (L.) Pers., Delonix regia L., Euphorbia hirta L., E. tirucalli L., Ficus benghalensis

L., Gmelina asiatica L., Santalum album L., and Tecomella undulata (Sm.) Seem, for

potential antibacterial activity. The plant extracts were more active against Gram-positive

bacteria than against Gram-negative bacteria (Parekh et al., 2005).

A study in which 21 essential oils were tested, showed that 19 essential oils had antibacterial

activity against one or more strains of four gram-negative bacteria. Cinnamon, clove,

geranium, lemon, lime, orange and rosemary oils exhibited significant inhibitory effect.

Majority of the oils showed antibacterial activity against the tested strains hence can be a

potential source for antibacterial agents (Seenivasan et al., 2006).

Leaf extracts of seven South African plant species, Cussonia zuluensis, Vepris reflexa,

Curtisia dentata, Trichilia emetica, Terminalia phanerophlebia, Terminalia sambesiaca and

Kigelia africana, were evaluated for antibacterial and antifungal activities using microplate

dilution method. The acetone and dichloromethane extracts of all plant leaves were active

against some or all of the tested microorganisms. Some extracts had the highest activities

against both bacterial and fungal test organisms with minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC)

values as low as 0.02 mg/ml (Shai et al., 2008).

Crude extracts of various Agapanthus africanus plant parts were screened in vitro against

eight economically important plant pathogenic fungi radial mycelial growth was inhibited

significantly in five test organisms (Tegegnea et al., 2008).

Page 16: Final week report (LFS1827)

8

In another study, 10 wild plants namely Mesembryanthemum crystallinum, Blackiella aellen,

Arthrocnemon glaucum, Atriplex halimus, Thymelaea hirsute, Carduus getulus, Nicotiana

glauca, Alhagi maurorum, Atractylis carduus and Echinops spinosissimus hexane and

methanol extracts showed strong antibacterial activity (Salwa et al., 2011).

Inhibitory activities of both aqueous and methanolic extracts of the root, stem bark, and leaf

of Morinda lucida on Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhi, Salmonella paratyphi, and

Salmonella typhorium was investigated in vitro. The results of this study show that the

extracts of M. lucida has the potentials of inhibiting the growth of E. coli and Salmonella

spp., thereby suggesting its potency in the treatment of infections in which E. coli and

Salmonella spp. are implicated (Fakoya et al., 2014).

The leaf extracts of Adhatoda vasica and Crotolaria verrucosa were subjected for screening

of in vitro antibacterial activity against selected major human pathogenic bacterial strains like

Bacillus substilis, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus vulgaris and

Pseudomonas aeruginosa by agar well diffusion method. The results of antibacterial activity

revealed that the A. vasica and C. verrucosa leaf extracts showed good activity on the

selected bacterial strains (Prasad et al., 2015).

2.2 Antioxidant activity of Plant Extracts

A recent review reported about spices and herbs being used for thousands of years for

flavour, aroma, as colouring in foods and as preservatives. They contain powerful

antioxidants that have been proven to be effective in inhibiting lipid oxidation or slowing

down the onset of rancidity in foods. Antioxidants from spices and herbs possess desirable

properties such as being natural, non-GMO and having clean label ingredients (i.e., can be

listed as spice or herb or flavouring). Antioxidant activities and antioxidant capacities of

compounds from spices and herbs have been determined and well published in the scientific

literature. Interests in food antioxidants from spices and herbs will continue to increase as

well as research and technology that will develop better ways of growing spices and herbs

that contain higher amounts of antioxidants (Milda, 2015).

Another research analyzed the methanolic crude extracts of 12 traditionally used Indian

medicinal plants for their antioxidant and free radical scavenging properties using α-

tocopherol and butylated hydroxy toluene (BHT) as standard antioxidants. Free radical

scavenging activity was evaluated using diphenyl picryl hydrazyl (DPPH) radicals. Seven

Page 17: Final week report (LFS1827)

9

plants, namely Terminalia chebula, Mangifera indica, Terminalia bellerica, Punica

granatum, Ocimum sanctum, Cichorium intybus and Camellia sinensis showed strong free

radical scavenging activity with the DPPH method. The tested plant extracts showed

promising antioxidant and free radical scavenging activity (Aqil et al., 2006).

Another study evaluated the antioxidant activity of spice extracts such as ginger, turmeric

and garlic by 2, 2’-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) Radical Scavenging Method. The

antioxidant activities when compared among ginger, turmeric and garlic the potency of these

spices was found to be in the order of Vit C > Ginger > Turmeric ≥ Dry garlic > Fresh garlic.

The study indicates that the spices like ginger, garlic and turmeric have antioxidant activity.

Further studies are needed to study the biological effects of antioxidant-rich herbs and spices

on oxidative stress related diseases (Virendra et al., 2013).

The aim of another study was to evaluate the antioxidant power of curcumin by two methods

i.e., 1,1-diphenyl-2-picryl hydrazyl radical (DPPH) assay and reducing power activity (RPA),

compared with ascorbic acid, a well known antioxidant. Percentage of free radical

scavenging of curcumin and ascorbic acid was more than 69 and 62 % at concentration 0.1

mM, respectively. No difference was observed between curcumin and ascorbic acid in

antioxidant potencies. These results showed excellent antioxidant activity for curcumin and it

is main reason for biological activities of curcumin (Asouri et al., 2013).

Dealing with Zingiberaceae family to explore their antioxidant activities determined by

measuring 1,1-diphenyl-2-picryl-hydrazyl (DPPH) free radical scavenging activity of spice

extracts including turmeric (Curcuma longa L. ), white saffron (C. mangga Val.), temulawak

(C. xanthorrhiza Roxb), ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) were used. Ten concentrations

of extracts 100; 50; 25; 12.5; 6.25; 3.125; 1.563; 0.781; 0.391 and 0.195 µg/mL were

performed to determine the DPPH scavenging activities. Results showed that Inhibitory

Concentrations (IC)-50 of DPPH were as followed C. longa 8.33 µg/mL; C. mangga 277.79;

C. xanthorrhiza 39.58 µg/mL µg/m; Z. officinale 10.51 µg/mL; and curcumin 7.85 µg/mL..

In the study, C. longa extract showed the highest antioxidant activity among all tested

extracts and the lowest antioxidant activity was C. mangga (Wahyu et al., 2011).

In another research, the antioxidant activity of curcumin employing antioxidant assays 1,1-

diphenyl-2-picryl hydrazyl free radical (DPPH) scavenging was measured. Curcumin had an

effective DPPH scavenging. Also, BHA, BHT, α-tocopherol and trolox, were used as the

Page 18: Final week report (LFS1827)

10

reference antioxidant and radical scavenger compounds. According to that study, curcumin

was proposed to be used in the pharmacological and food industry because of these

properties (Tuba and Ilhami, 2008).

A study was performed to examine the antioxidant activity of Trachyseprmum ammi (L)

Sprague (Ajwain) essential oil. It was determined that the tested essential oil possessed a

high degree of FRAP (ferric reducing antioxidant power), a good DPPH (2, 2-diphenyl-1-

picryl-hydrazyl) radical scavenging activity and a moderate H2O2 radical scavenging activity.

The study found that the essential oil of Ajwain could serve as a significant bio resource of

antioxidants, for use in the food and pharmaceutical industry (Ak and Gulc, 2008).

The acidic and neutral polyphenolic fractions of the oils from ajwain, mustard, fenugreek and

poppy seeds were tested for antioxidant activity. The highest amount of polyphenols was

found in ajwain, followed by mustard seeds, fenugreek and poppy seeds. The study

concludes that oil seeds are potential sources of natural antioxidants which may replace

synthetic ones (Shaguftalshiaque et al., 2013).

The study was done to determine the antioxidant and free radical scavenging potential of

ethanolic seed extract of Trachyspermum ammi (L) Sprague (ESETA). Antioxidant potential

of ESETA was evaluated by different scavenging models including DPPH, nitric oxide,

superoxide, and hydroxyl radical as well as its lipid peroxidation ability in bovine brain

extract. The presence of various phyto-constituents including alkaloids, glycosides,

terpenoids, saponins, phenols and steroids were revealed upon phytochemical analysis of

ESETA. ESETA displayed concentration-dependent reducing power ability and remarkable

ferric ion-induced lipid peroxidation inhibitory effect in bovine brain extract. These results

confirm the efficacy of ESETA as a potential source of antioxidant (Bajpai and Agrawal,

2015).

The above reports about the studies done on various plant species have clearly stated the

potential of plants as an effective and promising source of antimicrobial and antioxidant

agents. Inspired by these, the study was focused on exploring the same for some plant

extracts.

Page 19: Final week report (LFS1827)

11

3. MATERIALS AND METHODS

3.1 Place and Duration of Study

The experiments were carried out in the Biological Product Laboratory, Department of

Botany, University of Allahabad, Allahabad, during the period from 27th May 2015 to 22nd July

2015.

3.2 Materials

3.2.1 Culture Media Used: Name and Composition

(i) Autoclavable media

a) Solid Media

Nutrient Agar (28.0g/L)

Ingredients Grams/Liter

Beef Extract 1.0

Yeast Extract 2.0

Peptone 5.0

Sodium Chloride 5.0

Agar 15.0

Distilled Water 1.0 L

Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (SDA) (65.0g/L)

Ingredients Grams/Liter

Mycological peptone 10.0

Dextrose 40.0

Agar 15.0

Distilled Water 1.0 L

Page 20: Final week report (LFS1827)

12

b) Broth or Liquid Media

Mueller Hinton Broth (MHB) (38.0g/L)

Ingredients Grams/Liter

Casein Acid hydrolysate 17.5

Beef Extract 3.0

Starch 1.5

Distilled Water 1.0 L

Preparation

o Mentioned composition of each constituent was carefully measured using a Physical balance.

o All the constituents were put in an Erlenmeyer flask covered using sterile cotton plug and

mixed with required amount of distilled water.

o The mixture was made homogenous by gentle heating and constant mixing until turbidity of

the solution was not visible.

o The medium was sterilized using wet sterilization technique at once after homogenizing. For

this media was kept at 121⁰C and 15 psi for a period of 20 minutes in an Autoclave chamber.

o The media was only opened under complete sterile environment such as Laminar Air Flow

chamber for further use.

(ii) Non- Autoclavable:

RPMI– 1640 ( Rosewell Park Memorial Institute Media) (16.4g/L)

o Desired amount of RPMI was measured and put in an Erlenmeyer flask to mix with required

amount of distilled water.

o Mixing was done to achieve homogenized solution. The media was not heated at all to avoid

denaturation of biomolecules present.

o Sterilization method employed was Filter Sterilization done using Vacuum filter and

Millipore filter paper of pore size 0.22 µm.

3.2.2 Chemical Agents

Chromic Acid:

Page 21: Final week report (LFS1827)

13

o 20 g of Potassium Dichromate was added with small amount of water.

o Sufficient mixing to obtain a paste of chromate salt was done.

o To the paste 300ml of concentrated H2SO4 was added.

Double Distilled Water

Ethanol

Formaldehyde

Acetone

Methanol

DPPH(Di-phenyl Picryl hydrazine)

DMSO (Dimethyl sulphoxide)

3.2.3 Microbial Strains

a) Bacteria

Vibrio cholera

Salmonella typhimurium

Klebsiella pneumoniae

b) Fungi

Epidermophyton floccosum

Microsporum fulvum

Microsporum gypseum

3.2.4 Laboratory Equipment

Autoclave

Laminar Air Flow Chamber

Micropipette

Physical Balance

96 well Plates

UV – Visible Spectrophotometer (Figure 3A)

B.O.D. Incubators

Clevenger (Figure 3B)

Erlenmeyer Flasks

Petri Dishes

Measuring Jars

Page 22: Final week report (LFS1827)

14

Nonabsorbent Cotton Plugs

Inoculation Loop and Spatula

Figure 3: SpectraMax Plus384, Molecular Devices Corporation, U.S.A. (A); Clevenger

apparatus (B).

3.2.5 Extracts/Compounds/oil

BPL-11; BPL-14; BPL-16; BPL-Ua were tested for Antimicrobial Activity and obtained

from Biological Product Laboratory, Department of Botany, University of Allahabad. The

concentration of stock was 50 mg/mL.

BPL-Ua; BPL-Ma; BPL-Pn extracts were used for Antioxidant Assays and obtained from

Biological Product Laboratory, Department of Botany, University of Allahabad. The

concentration of stock was 50 mg/mL.

Oil of Trachyspermum ammi (L) Sprague was extracted using Clevenger Apparatus from

fruit pod of T. ammi for Antioxidant Assay. The concentration of stock was 50 µL/mL.

3.3 Methods

3.3.1 Cleaning of Glass Equipment

Microbes, being the masters of adaptation are omnipotent resulting in random growth of

multiple species together. Contamination in a growth media is one of the biggest menaces a

microbiologist faces. To tackle the same, one must sterilize the glass wares and the medium

which is being used for the growth of microbes. By this, not only one avoids random growth but

A B

Page 23: Final week report (LFS1827)

15

also can achieves a pure colony easily. For the study, following methods were employed for

sterilization and cleaning the glass wares.

3.3.2 Washing

o The glassware such as culture tubes, Petri plates, Erlenmeyer Flasks, beakers etc. were

washed with soap solution using running water.

o After washing with detergent, they were dipped in 5% Chromic Acid solution for at least 30

minutes.

o The glassware were further washed with tap water and dried in air.

3.3.3 Sterilization

Sterilization is the process of rendering a medium or material free of all forms of life which can

be achieved by three basic methods. They are summarized as follows:

i. Wet Heat Sterilization

The most useful approach is autoclaving, in which items are sterilized by exposure to steam at

121°C and 15 lbs of pressure for 15 minutes or longer, depending on the nature of the item.

Under these conditions, microorganisms, even endospores, will not survive.

o The glassware such as conical flasks, test tubes, etc., was plugged with nonabsorbent cotton.

o Petri dishes were wrapped in a clean wrapping paper or aluminum foil.

o Forceps, scalpels, glass rods were kept in test tubes and plugged with nonabsorbent cotton,

and covered with wrapping paper.

o The pipette tip boxes were wrapped with paper.

o All the equipment’s were put in an autoclave for 20 minutes 121°C under 15 lbs pressure.

ii. Dry Sterilization

Often, dry glassware’s are affected by steam as it tends to etch glassware and also leaves it

damp. Therefore, such items are generally dry-heat sterilized.

o The glassware were wrapped carefully and plugged with cotton if necessary.

o The glassware were then kept in an oven at 140°C–160°C for 2 h. it was made sure the

temperature not rises above 180⁰C, which leads to burning of cotton.

iii. Filter Sterilization

Thermo labile compounds such as amino acids, vitamins, number of plant growth hormones,

etc., are usually destroyed during autoclaving. And thus are sterilized by filtration through

Millipore filtration membranes of 0.22 or 0.45μm porosity which physically removes bacteria

and larger microorganisms from the solution and thereby sterilizes them without heat.

o A vacuum filter chamber was cleaned and autoclaved.

Page 24: Final week report (LFS1827)

16

o A clean Erlenmeyer flask was taken and autoclaved after being plugged with non-absorbent

cotton.

o Vacuum filter or the Millipore filtration unit was fixed with a new bacteriological

membranes (0.22 or 0.45μm) in place.

o The media was passed through the filter by the use of a vacuum pump to obtain a sterile

media which was further used (Bryce, 1992; Graser et al., 2000).

3.3.4 Antifungal assay (Rex et al., 2008)

1) Preparation of media

RPMI-1640 medium (Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium) supplemented with

MOPS buffer [3-(N-morpholino) propanesulfonic acid] was the media used. The media was

mixed thoroughly without using heat to prevent denaturation of the biomolecules present in the

media.

2) Sterilization of media

RPMI-1640 medium was sterilized using a vacuum filter.

3) Preparation of inoculum

i. One loop full of colony was dispensed in saline media and homogenized.

ii. Once the optical density equivalent to 0.5 McFarland was obtained, it was taken as stock.

4) Testing format

I. Negative control

40% formaldehyde in inoculum was added to kill the cells. 100µL of this culture suspension was

added to each well in column 1. This served as a negative control.

II. Broth control

200µL of media was added to each well in media/broth control lane per well. No organism and

no test samples were added. This was done to check contamination in the media.

III. Positive control

For positive control, contains 100µL of broth and 100 µL of inoculum prepared.

IV. Drug control

Drug control well contains 190 µL of broth and 10 µL of drug/compound/extract/oil.

5) Calculation of MIC

Optical density (O.D.) was recorded with a spectrophotometer (SpectraMax Plus384, Molecular

Devices Corporation, USA) at 530 nm after 96 hrs incubated at 35 ± 2 ⁰C. Per cent inhibition

was calculated using the following equations:

Page 25: Final week report (LFS1827)

17

Per cent Inhibition (%) = [(O.D. positive control- O.D. drug treated)/(O.D. positive control)] x

100.

Minimum Inhibitory Concentration was obtained statistically and graphically using a computer

programmed software.

3.3.5 Antibacterial assay (Wilker et al., 2006)

1) Preparation of media

Mueller Hinton broth (MHB) was the media used. The media was mixed thoroughly using heat

to obtain homogenized solution.

2) Sterilization of media

The Erlenmeyer Flask containing the media was sealed with a cotton plug and autoclaved at

121⁰C and 15 lbs for 15 minutes.

3) Preparation of inoculum

i. One loop full of colony was dispensed in the saline media and homogenized.

ii. Once the desired optical density equivalent to 0.5 McFarland is obtained, it was taken as

stock.

4) Testing format

i. Negative control

40% formaldehyde in inoculum was added to kill the cells. 100µL of this culture suspension was

added to each well in column 1. This served as a negative control.

ii. Broth control

200µL of media was added to each well in media/broth control lane per well. No organism and

no test samples were added. This was done to check contamination in the media.

iii. Positive control

For positive control, contains 100µL of broth and 100 µL of inoculum prepared.

iv. Drug control

Drug control well contains 190 µL of broth and 10 µL of drug/compound/extract/oil.

v. Obtaining MIC

Optical density (O.D.) was recorded with a spectrophotometer (SpectraMax Plus384, Molecular

Devices Corporation, USA) at 492 nm after 24 hrs incubated at 35 ± 2 ⁰C. Per cent inhibition

was calculated using the following equations:

Per cent Inhibition (%) = [(O.D. positive control- O.D. drug treated)/(O.D. positive control)] x

100.

Page 26: Final week report (LFS1827)

18

Minimum Inhibitory Concentration was obtained statistically and graphically using a computer

programmed software.

3.4 Extraction of Trachyspermum ammi (L) Sprague Oil

T. ammi oil for DPPH Antioxidant Assay was extracted from fruits (cremocarp) using the

clevenger apparatus.

About 250 grams of T. ammi fruit pods were purchased, cleaned and filled in clevenger

apparatus.

Tap water was put in the round bottom flask such the water level was equal to heating

mantle.

The heating unit was switched on at a temperature of 60⁰C till boiling was observed.

As boiling started, the temperature was reduced to 40⁰C and maintained for a period of

72 hrs.

After 72 hrs, oil was taken out and the per cent yield was measured using the formula

Per cent Yield = (Weight of Oil obtained/ Weight of turmeric taken.) x 100

The T. ammi oil was stored for further analysis.

3.4.1 Determination of Scavenging Activity of Oils and Plant Extracts by DPPH Assay

Protocol:

i. In a 96 well plate, the antioxidant tests were conducted in replicates.

ii. The first two columns contained 180µL of DPPH and 20µL of DMSO. These two

columns were taken as blank.

iii. The sample to be tested was taken in varying concentrations, 20µL, 17.5µL, 15µL,

12.5µL and so on till 5µL. In each of these wells the volume was made up to 20µL using

DMSO.

iv. 180µL of DPPH (100 µg/mL in methanol) is added in each well.

v. Vitamin C (1 mg/ml) was taken as a standard.

vi. The entire setup was kept incubated in the dark for 30 minutes.

vii. Optical density (O.D.) was recorded with a spectrophotometer (SpectraMax Plus384,

Molecular Devices Corporation, USA) at 517 nm.

Calculations:

Per cent Scavenging ability = [1-(O.DSample/O.DBlank)]x100

Page 27: Final week report (LFS1827)

19

4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

4.1 Antibacterial tests

Three pathogens were chosen for the antibacterial tests, V. cholera, K. pneumonia and S.

typhimurium. Gentamicin, a synthetic drug was taken as the standard. The other drugs tested

were BPL-11, BPL-14 and BPL-16.

4.1.1 Gentamicin

The susceptibility of bacteria against gentamicin is represented in Figure 4 and Table 1. The

minimum concentration for 90% inhibition against any pathogen was 0.692 mg/mL. Gentamicin

was found to be most effective against Vibrio cholerae and least against Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Figure 4: The concentration of Gentamicin vs Per cent inhibition of three pathogens V. cholerae,

K. pneumoniae and S. typhimurium.

4.1.2 BPL-11

The growth of all three test pathogens was effectively inhibited by BPL-11 and most effective

against S. typhimurium and least against K. pneumonia and represented in Figure 5 and Table 1.

Page 28: Final week report (LFS1827)

20

Figure 5: The concentration of BPL-11 vs Per cent inhibition of three pathogens V. cholerae, K.

pneumoniae and S. typhimurium.

4.1.3 BPL-14

BPL-14 was the least effective against the three test pathogens and individual susceptibility of

bacteria towards BPL-14 were represented in Figure 6 and Table 1.

Figure 6: The concentration of BPL-14 vs Per cent inhibition of three pathogens V. cholerae, K.

pneumoniae and S. typhimurium.

Page 29: Final week report (LFS1827)

21

4.1.4 BPL-16

BPL-16 was found to have a lower minimum concentration for 90% inhibition than the standard

drug, Gentamicin. All the test pathogens were effectively inhibited, however, BPL-16 was not as

effective as BPL-14. The efficacies of BPL-16 against bacteria tested were represented in Figure

7 and Table 1.

Figure 7: The concentration of BPL-16 vs Per cent inhibition of three pathogens V. cholera, K.

pneumonia and S. typhimurium.

Table 1: IC50 and IC90 gentamicin and drugs tested against three bacteria.

Gentamicin BPL-16 BPL-14 BPL-11

Pathogens IC50 IC90 IC50 IC90 IC50 IC90 IC50 IC90

V. cholera 0.197 0.629 0.230 0.502 0.672 1.133 0.256 0.478

K. pneumonia 0.412 1.139 0.215 0.585 0.765 1.162 0.275 0.511

S. typhimurium 0.328 0.897 0.219 0.533 0.701 1.130 0.225 0.393

* All the values were represented in mg/ml.

Page 30: Final week report (LFS1827)

22

Figure 8: Comparative IC50 and IC90 of Test drugs.

The antibacterial activity of the compounds BPL-11 and BPL-16 was more effective when

compared with the standard used (Figure 8), i.e. Gentamicin. This shows promise for use of the

compounds as antibiotics.

4.2 Antifungal tests

Three pathogens were chosen for the antifungal tests, E. floccosum, M. fulvum and M. gypseum.

Sertaconazole NitrateBP was taken as the standard. BPL-Ua was tested against the same

pathogens. The antifungal activity has been recorded, as seen below:

4.2.1 BPL-Ua

BPL-Ua was found to have a lower minimum concentration for 90% inhibition than the standard

drug tested, i.e. Sertaconazole, against the three test pathogens, E. floccosum, M. fulvum and M.

gypseum. The relationship between the BPL-Ua concentration and percent inhibition of

aforementioned fungi were represented in Figure 9 and Table 2.

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

IC50 IC90 IC50 IC90 IC50 IC90 IC50 IC90

Gentamicin BPL-16 BPL-14 BPL-11

Co

nce

ntr

atio

n (

mg/

mL)

V. cholerae

K. pneumoniae

S. typhimurium

Page 31: Final week report (LFS1827)

23

Figure 9: The concentration vs Per cent inhibition of BPL-Ua against three pathogens E.

floccosum, M. fulvum and M. gypseum.

4.2.2 Sertaconazole NitrateBP

Sertaconazole was the standard drug taken. It has higher minimum concentration for 90%

inhibition of all pathogens when compared to BPL-Ua. The relationship between the

Sertaconazole concentration and aforementioned fungi tested were represented in Figure 10 and

Table 2.

Figure 10: The concentration vs Per cent inhibition of Sertaconazole NitrateBP against three

pathogens E. floccosum, M. fulvum and M. gypseum.

Page 32: Final week report (LFS1827)

24

Table 2: Inhibitory concentrations (mg/mL) of Sertaconazole and BPL-Ua.

Sertaconazole BPL-Ua

Pathogens IC50 IC90 IC50 IC90

E. floccosum 0.66 0.70 0.02 0.03

M. fulvum 0.63 0.66 0.35 0.57

M. gypseum 0.99 1.32 0.29 0.32

Figure 11: Comparative IC50 and IC90 of BPL-Ua acetone extract and Sertaconazole NitrateBP.

The antifungal activity of BPL-Ua was more effective when compared with the standard

used (Figure 11), i.e. Sertaconazole NitrateBP. The results obtained show that the future

prospects of BPL-Ua as an antifungal are promising.

4.3 Per cent Yield of Trachyspermum ammi (L) Sprague essential oil

Weight of fruit pods taken = 250 g

Yield of oil = 10 mL

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

IC50 IC90 IC50 IC90

Sertaconazole BPL-Ua

Co

nce

ntr

atio

n (

mg/

mL)

E. floccosum

M. fulvum

M. gypseum

Page 33: Final week report (LFS1827)

25

Per cent Yield = 4%

4.4 Antioxidant tests

4.4.1 Vitamin C

EC50 (Amount of antioxidant necessary to decrease the initial DPPH concentration by 50%)

of Vitamin C was calculated graphically and found to be 0.021 mg/mL and calculated on the

basis of equation present in the Figure 12.

Figure 12: Per cent Scavenging ability of Vitamin C

4.4.2 Trachyspermum ammi (L) Sprague

Figure 13: Per cent Scavenging ability of Trachyspermum ammi extract

y = 2.8979x - 12.747R² = 0.9685

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0 10 20 30 40 50

Scav

en

gin

g ab

ility

Concentration of Vitamin C (µg/mL)

% Scavenging ability of Vitamin C

% Scavenging ability ofVitamin C

y = 2.6624x + 19.678R² = 0.9586

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 5 10 15 20 25

Scav

en

gin

g ab

ility

Concentration of Trachyspermum ammi extract (µL/mL)

% Scavenging ability of Trachyspermum ammi extract

% Scavenging ability ofTrachyspermum ammiextract

Page 34: Final week report (LFS1827)

26

EC50 of the extract of T. ammi was calculated graphically and found to be 11.3937 µL/mL

and calculated on the basis of equation present in the Figure 13.

4.4.3BPL-Ua

Figure 14: Per cent Scavenging ability of BPL-Ua.

EC50 of BPL-Ua was calculated graphically and found to be 3.3067 mg/mL and calculated on

the basis of equation present in the Figure 14.

4.4.4 BPL-Ma

Figure 15: Per cent Scavenging ability of BPL-Ma

y = 11.642x + 11.511R² = 0.9791

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

0 2 4 6

Scav

en

gin

g ab

ility

Concentration of BPL-Ua extract (mg/mL)

% Scavenging ability of BPL-Ua

% Scavenging ability ofBPL-Ua

y = 12.753x + 18.809R² = 0.8371

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

0 2 4 6

Scav

en

gin

g ab

ility

Concentration of BPL-Ma extract (mg/mL)

% Scavenging ability of BPL-Ma

% Scavenging ability ofBPL-Ma

Page 35: Final week report (LFS1827)

27

EC50 of BPL-Ma was calculated graphically and found to be 2.447 mg/mL and calculated on

the basis of equation present in the Figure 15.

4.4.5 BPL-Pn

Figure 16: Per cent Scavenging ability of BPL-Pn

EC50 of BPL-Pn was calculated graphically and found to be 3.878 mg/mL and calculated on

the basis of equation present in the Figure 16.

In the order of antioxidant activity, we have, Vitamin C > BPL-Pn > BPL-Ua > BPL-Ma. The

extract from the fruits of Trachyspermum ammi (L) Sprague, commonly used in Indian cooking,

showed good antioxidant activity. The results show great promise for future use of

aforementioned extracts/oil as antioxidants.

y = 13.413x - 2.0084R² = 0.976

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

0 2 4 6

Scav

en

gin

g ab

ility

Concentration of BPL-Pn extract (mg/mL)

% Scavenging ability of BPL-Pn

% Scavenging ability ofBPL-Pn

Page 36: Final week report (LFS1827)

28

5. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE PROSPECTS

Based on the tests conducted it was found that, BPL-11 has the best antibacterial activity and BPL-

Ua has the best antifungal activity among the tested drugs. BPL-Pn was found to have good

antioxidant activity along with the essential oil of Trachyspermum ammi (L) Sprague. Natural

products have been used since time immemorial for their health benefits. Ethnomedical uses of

some natural products have been reported in many countries, though it seems that many of these

have been forgotten over time. Till date, many of these are used as home remedies in both

developed and developing parts of the world. This study has shown that they have scope for use as

antifungal, antibiotics and antioxidants. Further research in this field will help identify the abilities

of different plant extracts and progress towards using them for the benefit of mankind.

Page 37: Final week report (LFS1827)

29

6. BIBLIOGRAPHY

Abreu, A.C, McBainb, A.J., and Sim~oes, M. (2012). Plants as sources of new antimicrobials and

resistance-modifying agents. Nat. Prod. Rep., 29, 1007.

Ahameethunisa, A.R., and Hooper, W. (2010). Antibacterial activity of Artemisia nilagirica leaf extracts

against clinical and phytopathogenic bacteria, BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 10, 1-6.

Ak, T., and Gulc, I. (2008). Antioxidant and radical scavenging properties of Curcumin. Chemico-

Biological Interactions 174 27–37. Chatterjee, S., Goswami, N., & Kothari, N. (2013). Evaluation of

antioxidant activity of essential oil from Ajwain (Trachyspermum ammi) seeds. Int J Green Pharm, 7,

140-144.

Ames, B.N., Shigenaga, M.K., and Hagen, T.M. (1993). Oxidants, antioxidants, and the degenerative

diseases of aging. 90(17), 7915–7922. http://www.pnas.org/content/90/17/7915.short

Andersson, D.I., and Hughes, D. (2010). Antibiotic resistance and its cost: is it possible to reverse

resistance? Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 8, 260–271.

Anonymous. (1993). Summary of WHO guidelines for assessment of herbal medicines. Herbal Gram, 28,

13-14.

Anonymous. (2011). Regional Committee for Europe, European strategic action plan on antibiotic

resistance, Copenhagen,

Aqil, F., Ahmad, I., and Mehmood, Z. (2006). Antioxidant and Free Radical Scavenging Properties of

Twelve Traditionally Used Indian Medicinal Plants. Turk J Biol., 30, 177-183.

Asouri, M., Ataee, R., Ahmadi, A.A., Amini, A., and Moshaei, M.R. (2013). Antioxidant and Free

Radical Scavenging Activities of Curcumin. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 25(13), 7593-7595.

Bajpai, V.K., and Agrawal, P. (2015). Studies on Phytochemicals, Antioxidant, Free Radical Scavenging

and Lipid Peroxidation Inhibitory effects of Trachyspermum ammi seeds. Indian Journal of

Pharmaceutical Education and Research, 9(1).

Basualdo, C., Sgroy, V., Finola, M.S., and Juam, M. (2007). Comparison of the antibacterial activity of

honey from different provenance against bacteria usually isolated from skinwounds. Veterinary

Microbiology, 124, 375-381.

Berdy, J. (2005). Bioactive microbial metabolites. J Antibiot, 58, 1–26.

Bibi, S.F.B., Mehrangiz, K., and Hamid, R.S. (2005). In Vitro Antibacterial Activity of Rheum ribes

Extract Obtained from Various Plant Parts against Clinical Isolates of Gram-Negative Pathogens. Iranian

Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 2, 87-91.

Blokhina, O., Virolainen, E., and Fagerstedt, K.V. (2003). Antioxidants, Oxidative Damage and Oxygen

Deprivation Stress: a Review. Annals of Botany, 91, 179-194.

Brehm-Stecher, B.F., and Johnson, E.A. (2003). Sensitization of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia

coli to Antibiotics by the Sesquiterpenoids Nerolidol, Farnesol, Bisabolol, and Apritone. Antimicrob.

Agents Chemother.,47, 3357–3360.

Page 38: Final week report (LFS1827)

30

Brodsky, I.E., and Medzhitov, R. (2009). Targeting of immune signaling networks by bacterial pathogens.

Nat. Cell Biol., 11, 521–526.

Bryce, K. (1992). The Fifth kingdom. J Mycologue Publications Ontario, 451.

Burt, S.A. (2004). Essential oils: their antibacterial properties andpotential applications in foods: a review.

Inter J Food Microbiol, 94, 223-253.

Buttner, M.P., Willeke, K., and Grinshpun, S.A. (1996). Sampling and analysis of airborne

microorganisms. In Manual of Environmental Microbiology Edited by: Hurst CJ, Knudsen GR,

McInerney MJ, Stetzenbach LD,Walter MV. ASM Press: Washington, DC; 629-640.

Cadenas, E. (1989). Biochemistry of oxygen toxicity. Ann. Rev. Biochem., 58, 79–110.

Carando, S., Teissedre, P.L., Pascual-Martinez, L., and Cabanis, J.C. (1999). Levels of flavan-3-ols in

French wines. J Agr Food Chem, 47, 4161–4166.

Casadevall, A., and Pirofski, L.A. (2000). Host–pathogen interactions:basic concepts of microbial

commensalism, colonization, infection, and disease. Infect. Immun., 68, 6511–6518.

Chandra, J., Samali, A., and Orrenius, S. (2000). Triggering and modulation of apoptosis by oxidative

stress. Free Radic. Biol., 29, 323–333.

Cowan, M.M. (1999). Plant products as antimicrobial agents. ClinMicrobiol Rev., 12(4), 564-82.

Curtis, C. (1998). Use and abuse of topical dermatological therapy in dogs and cats. Part 1. Shampoo. J

TherPract., 20, 244–51.

Dantas, G., Sommer, M.O., Oluwasegun, R.D., and Church, G.M. (2008). Bacterial Subsisting on

Antibiotics. Science, 320, 100–103.

Darokar, M.P., Mathur, A., Dwivedi, S., Bhalla, R., Khanuja, S.P.S., and Kumar, S. (1998). Detection of

antibacterial activity in the floral petals of somehigher plants. CurrSci, 75, 187.

Devasagayam, Tilak, J.C., Boloor, K.K., Sane, K.S., Ghaskadbi, S.S., and Lele, R.D. (2004). Free

Radicals and Antioxidants in Human Health: Current Status and Future Prospects TPA. JAPI, 52.

Diacovich, L., and Gorvel, J.P. (2010). Bacterial manipulation of innateimmunity to promote infection.

Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 8, 117–128.

Dismukes, W.E. (2006). Antifungal therapy: lessons learned over the past 27 years. ClinInfect Dis, 42,

1289–1296.

Duraipandiyan, V., Sasi, A.H., Islam, V.I.H., Valanarasu, M., and Ignacimuthu, S. (2010). Antimicrobial

properties of actinomycetes from the soil of Himalaya. J Med Mycol, 20, 15.

Elakkia, S.A., and Venkatesalu, V. (2013). Antimicrobial activity of different solvent extracts of some

Cassia species. Int J Pharma Bio Sci., 4, 728‑736.

Enne, V.I., Livermore, D.M., Stephens, P., and Hal, L.M.C. (2001). Persistence of sulphonamide

resistance in Escherichia coli in the UK despite national prescribing restriction. The Lancet, 28, 1325-

1328.

Page 39: Final week report (LFS1827)

31

Faid, M., Bakhy, K., Anchad, M., and Tantaoui-Elaraki, A. (1995). Physicochemical and microbiological

characterizations and preservation with sorbic acid and cinnamon. J Food Prod, 58, 547-550.

Fakoya, A., Owojuyigbe, O.S, Fakoya, S., and Adeoye, S.O. (2014). Possible antimicrobial activity of

Morinda lucida stem bark, leaf and root extracts. 13(3), 471-475.

Fang, Y., Yang, S., and Wu, G. (2002). Free radicals, antioxidants, and nutrition. Nutrition, 18(10), 872–

879.

Farthing, M.J.G., and Kelly, P. (2007). Infectious diarrhoea. Medicine Gastroenterology Part 3 of 4, 35,

251–256.

Finch, R.G. (1998). Antibiotic resistance. J. Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 42, 125-128.

Franco, R., Schoneveld, O., Georgakilas, A., and Panayiotidis, M. (2008). Oxidative stress, DNA

methylation and carcinogenesis. Cancer Lett, 266, 6–11.

Gerhardt, U., and Schroter, A. (1983). Antioxidative Wirkung von Gewtirzen. Gordian, 9, 171-176.

Gibbons, S. (2005). Plants as a source of bacterial resistance modulators and anti‑infective agents.

Phytochem Rev, 4, 63‑78.

Gilbert, D.L. (1981). Oxygen and living processes: an interdisciplinary approach, Springer, NY.

Gilbert, P., Maira-Litran, T., McBain, A.J., Rickard, A.H., and Whyte, F.W. (2002). The physiology and

collective recalcitrance of microbial biofilm communities. Adv. Microb. Physiol., 46, 203–256.

Goossens, H. (2005). European status of resistance in nosocomialinfections. Chemotherapy, 51, 177–181.

Graser, Y., Kuijpers, A.F.A., Presber, W., and Hoo, G.S. (2000). Molecular taxonomy of the

Trichophytonrubrum complex. J ClinMicrobiol., 38, 3329-36.

Hailu, T., Endris, M. Kaleab, A., and Tsige, G. (2005). Antimicrobial activities of some selected

traditional Ethiopian medicinal plants used in the treatment of skin disorders. Journal of

Ethnopharmacology, 100, 168–175.

Halliwell, B. (1994). Free Radicals and Antioxidants: a Personal View. Nutrition Reviews. 52(8), 253-

265.

Halliwell, B. (1996). Antioxidants in human health and disease. Ann. Rev. Nutr., 16, 33–50.

DOI: 10.1146/annurev.nu.16.070196.000341

Halliwell, B., and Gutteridge, J.M.C. (1989). Free radicals in biology and medicine, 2nd ed. Oxford:

Clarendon Press, 1989.

Halliwell, B., and Gutteridge, J.M.C. (1995). The definition and measurement of antioxidants in

biological systems. Free Radic Biol Med, 18, 125–6.

Halliwell, B., and Gutteridge, J.M.C. (1997). (eds), Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine, Oxford

University Press, Oxford.

Halliwell, B. and Gutteridge, J.M.C. (1999). Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine. (3rd ed.) Oxford

University Press, Oxford.

Page 40: Final week report (LFS1827)

32

Halliwell, B., Gutteridge, J.M.C., and Cross, C.E. (1992). Free radicals, antioxidants, and human disease:

Where are we now? Translational Research, 119(6), 598-620.

Hammer, K.A., Carson, C.F., and Riley, T.V. (1999). Antimicrobial activity of essential oils and other

plant extracts. J. Appl. Microbiol., 86(6), 985.

Hammerstone J.F., Lazarus, S.A., and Schmitz, H.H. (2000). Procyanidin content and variation in some

commonly consumed foods. J Nutr, 130, 2086S–2092S.

Hara, Y., Luo, S.J., Wickremasinghe, R.L., and Yamanishi, T. (1995). Special issue on tea. Food Rev Int,

11, 371–542.

Harman, D. (1956). Ageing: a theory based on free radical and radiation chemistry. J Gerontol, 11, 298-

300.

Helle, L.M., Bo, R.N., Grete, B., and Leif, H.S. (1996). Screening of antioxidative activity of spices. A

comparison between assays based on ESR spin trapping and electrochemical measurement of oxygen

consumption. Food Chemistry, 57(2), 331-337.

Hussain, H., Badawy, A., Elshazly, A., Elsayed, A., Krohn, K., Riaz, M., and Schulz, B. (2011).

Chemical Constituents and Antimicrobial Activity of Salix subserrata. Rec. Nat. Prod., 5(2), 133-137.

Iwu, M.W., Duncan, A.R., and Okunji, C.O. (1999). New antimicrobials of plant origin. In: Janick J. (Ed)

Perspectives on New Crops and New Uses. ASHSpress, Alexandria 457-462.

Jagessar, R.C., Mars, A., and Gomes, G. (2008). Selective Antimicrobial properties of Phyllanthusacidus

leaf extract against Candida albicans, Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus using Stokes Disc

diffusion, Well diffusion, Streakplate and a dilution method. Nature and Science, 6(2), 24-38. ISSN:

1545-0740.

Kamali, H.H.E.L., and Amir, M.Y.E.L. (2010). Antibacterial Activity and Phytochemical Screening of

Ethanolic Extracts Obtained from Selected Sudanese Medicinal Plants. Curr. Res. J. of Bio. Sci., 2(2),

143-146.

Kohen, R., and Nyska, A. (2002). Invited Review: Oxidation of Biological Systems: Oxidative Stress

Phenomena, Antioxidants, Redox Reactions, and Methods for Their Quantification. Toxicol Pathol.,

30(6), 620-650. DOI: 10.1080/01926230290166724

Kordali. S., Kotan, R., Mavi, A., Cakir, A., Ala, A., and Yildirim, A. (2005). Determination of the

chemical composition and antioxidant activity ofthe essential oil of Artemisia dracunculus and of the

antifungal and antibacterial activities of Turkish Artemisia absinthium, A. dracunculus, Artemisia

santonicum, and Artemisia spicigera essential oils. J Agric Food Chem, 53, 9452-9458.

Kreft, S., Knapp, M., and Kreft, I. (1999). Extraction of rutin from buckwheat (Fagopyrum

esculentum Moench) seeds and determination by capillary electrophoresis. J Agric Food Chem, 47, 4649–

4652.

Kuete, V. (2013). Medicinal Plant Research in Africa: Chapter 5, Page 212, Pharmacology and

Chemistry, Elsevier, Oxford.

Kumar, A., and Schweizer, H.P. (2005). Bacterial Resistance to antibiotics: active efflux and reduced

uptake. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev., 57, 1486–1513.

Page 41: Final week report (LFS1827)

33

Kunin, C.M. (1993). Resistance to antimicrobial drugs a worldwide calamity. Annals of Internal

Medicine, 118, 557-561.

Lalitha, P., Arathi, K.A., Shubashini, K., Sripathi, Hemalatha S., and Jayanthi, P. (2010). Antimicrobial

Activity and Phytochemical Screening of an Ornamental Foliage Plant, Pothosaurea (Linden ex Andre).

An Int. J. of Chem. 1(2), 63-71.

Li, M., Wang, B., and Zhang, M. (2008). Symbiotic gut microbes modulate human metabolic phenotypes.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(6), 2117-2122.

Maisnier-Patin, S., and Andersson, D.I. (2004). Adaptation to the deleterious of antimicrobial drug

resistance mutations by compensatory evolution. Res. Microbiol., 155, 360–369.

Mandal, S., Mandal, D.M., and Pal, N.K. (2010). Synergistic anti-Staphylococcus aureus activity of

amoxicillin in combination with Emblica officinalis and Nymphae odorata extracts. Asian Pacific Journal

of Tropical Medicine, 3, 711-714.

Martini, N., and Eloff, J.N. (1998). The preliminary isolation of several antibacterial compounds from

Combretum erythrophyllum — (Combretaceae). Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 62, 255–263.

Masoko, P., and Eloff, J.N. (2005). The diversity of antifungal compounds of six South African

Terminalia species (Combretaceae) determined by bioautography. African Journal of Biotechnology, 4,

1425–1431.

Masoko, P., Picard, J., and Eloff, J.N. (2005). Antifungal activities of six South African Terminalia

species (Combretaceae). Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 99, 301–308.

McGaw, L.J., Jäger, A.K., and Van Staden, J. (2000). Antibacterial, anthelmintic andanti-amoebic activity

in South African medicinal plants. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 72, 247–263.

McGaw, L.J., Rabe, T., Sparg, S.G., Jäger, A.K., Eloff, J.N., and Van Staden, J. (2001). An investigation

on the biological activity of Combretum species. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 75, 43–50.

Milda, E.E. (2015). Spices and herbs: Natural sources of antioxidants – a mini review, Journal of

Functional Foods, DOI: 10.1016/j.jff.2015.03.005.

Milhau, G., Valentin, A., Benoit, F., Mallie, M., Bastide, J., Pelissier, Y., and Bessiere, J. (1997). In vitro

antimicrobial activity of eight essential oils. J EssentOil Res, 9, 329-333.

Moellering, J.R.C., Graybill, J.R., McGowan, J.J.E., and Corey, L. (2007). Antimicrobial resistance

prevention initiative—an update: proceedings of an expert panel on resistance. The American Journal of

Medicine, 120, S4–S25.

Murugesan, S., Pannerselvam, A., and Tangavelou, A.C. (2011). Phytochemical screening and

antimicrobial activity of the leaves of Memecylon umbellatumburm. F. Journal of Applied

Pharmaceutical Science, 1, 42-45.

Nascimento, G.G.F., Locatelli, J., Freitas, P.C., and Silva, G.L. (2000). Antibacterial activity of plant

extracts and phytochemicals on antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Braz J Microbiol., 31(1), 247-56.

Page 42: Final week report (LFS1827)

34

Okeke, I.N., Laxmaninarayan, R., Bhutta, Z.A., Duse, A.G., Jenkins, P., and O’Brien, T.F. (2005).

Antimicrobial resistance in developing countries. Part 1: recent trends and current status. J Lancet Infect

Dis, 5, 481-93.

Papadoupoulo, C., Soulti, K., and Roussis, I.G. (2005). Potential antimicrobial activity of red and white

wine phenolic extracts against strains of Staphyloccocus aureus, Escherichia coli and Candida albicans.

F. Tech-Biotech., 43, 41-46.

Pier-Giorgio, P. (2000). Flavonoids as Antioxidants. J. Nat. Prod., 63, 1035-1042.

Poli, G., Leonarduzzi, G., Biasi, F., and Chiarpotto, E. (2004). Oxidative stress and cell signaling. Curr.

Med. Chem., 11, 1163–1182.

Prashant, V.K., Chauhan, N.S., Padh, H., and Rajani, M. (2006). “Search for antibacterial and antifungal

agents from selected Indian medicinal plants,” J Ethnopharmacol, 107(2), 182-188.

Rastogi, R.P., and Mehrotra, B.N. (2002). Glossary of Indian Medicinal Plants. National Institute of

science communication, New Delhi, India.

Reinli, K., and Block, G. (1996). Phytoestrogen content of foods: a compendium of literature values. Nutr

Cancer Int J, 26, 123–148.

Rex, J.H., Alexander, B.D., Andes, D., Arthington-Skaggs, B., Brown, S.D., Chaturveli, V., Espinel-

Ingroff, A., Ghannoum, M.A., Knapp, C.C., Motyl, M.R., Ostrosky-Ziechner, L., Pfaller, M., Sheehan,

D.J., and Walsh, T.J. (2008). Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of

filamentous fungi; Approved Standard-Second Edition. Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute

(CLSI), M38A2 28(16).

Robbers, J., Speedie, M., and Tyler, V. (1996). Pharmacognosy and Pharmacobiotechnology. Baltimore:

Williams and Wilkins; 1-14.

Rousseff, R.L., Martin, S.F., and Youtsey, C.O. (1987). Quantitative survey of narirutin, naringin,

heperidin, and neohesperidin in citrus. J Agric Food Chem, 35, 1027–1030.

Sakagami, Y., and Kajimura, K. (2002). Bactericidal activities of disinfectants against vancomycin

resistant enterococci. J HospInfec., 50(2), 140-4.

Salwa, M.A.R., Sawsan, A.A., Sahar, F.D., and Ashraf, A.K. (2011). Antibacterial activity of some wild

medicinal plants collected from western Mediterranean coast, Egypt: Natural alternatives for infectious

disease treatment. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10(52), 10733-10743.

Schelz, Z., Hohmann, J., and Molnar, J. (2010). In Ethnomedicine: A Source of Complementary

Therapeutics, ed. D. Chattopadhyay, Research Signpost, 1st edn, 6, 179–201.

Seenivasan, P., Manickkam, J., and Savarimuthu, I. (2006). In vitro antibacterial activity of some plant

essential oils. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 6, 39, DOI:10.1186/1472-6882-6-39.

Seifried, H.E., Anderson, D.E., Fisher, E.I., and Milner, J.A. (2007). A review of the interaction among

dietary antioxidants and reactive oxygen species. The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, 18(9), 567–

579.

Page 43: Final week report (LFS1827)

35

Shaguftalshiaque, K.N., Siddiqui, M.A., Siddiqi, R., and Shahina, N. (2013). Antioxidant Potential of the

Extracts, Fraction and Oils Derived from Oilseeds. Antioxidants, 2(4), 246-256.

Shai, L.J., McGaw, L.J., Masoko, P., and Eloff, J.N. (2008). Antifungal and antibacterial activity of seven

traditionally used South African plant species active against Candida albicans. South African Journal of

Botany, 74, 677–684.

Shobana, S., Akhilender, K., and Naidu. (2000). Antioxidant activity of selected Indian spices.

Prostaglandins, Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids (PLEFA), 62(2), 107–110.

Sibaram, P., Subhasish, M., and Mookerjee, M. (2012). Phytochemial investigation and evaluation of

anthelmintic activities of V. Negundo leaf extract. Int J Res Pharm Biomed Sci., 3, 1143‑1146.

Simoes, M., Rocha, R., Coimbra, M.A., and Vieira, M. (2008). Enhancement of Escherichia coli and

Staphylococcus aureus antibiotic susceptibility using sesquiterpenoids. Med. Chem., 4, 616–623.

Subashkumar, R., Sureshkumar, M., Babu, S., and Thayumanavan, T. (2013). Antibacterial effect of

crude aqueous extract of Piper betle L. Against pathogenic bacteria. Int J Res Pharm Biomed Sci., 4, 42-

46.

Sylvestre, M., Pichette, A., Longtin, A., Nagau, F., and Legault, J. (2006). Essential oil analysis and

anticancer activity of leaf essential oil of Crotonflavens L. from Guadeloupe. J Ethnopharmacol, 103, 99-

102.

Tegegnea, G., Pretoriusa, J.C., and Swartb, W.J. (2008). Antifungal properties of Agapanthus africanus

L. extracts against plant pathogens. Crop Protection, 27, 1052–1060.

Thomashow, L.S., Bonsall, R.E., and Weller, D.M. (1997). Antibiotic production by soil and rhizosphere

microbesin situ. In Manual of Environmental Microbiology, ed. CJ Hurst, GR Knudsen, MJ McInerney,

LD Stetzenbach, MV Walter, 493–99.

Tuba, A.K., and Ilhami, G. (2008). In Antioxidant and radical scavenging properties of Curcumin.

Chemico-Biological Interactions 174 (2008) 27–37.

Valko, M., Izakovic, M., Mazur, M., Rhodes, C.J., and Telser, J. (2004). Role of oxygen radicals in DNA

damage and cancer incidence. Mol. Cell. Biochem, 266, 37–56.

Valko, M., Leibfritz, D., Moncol, J., Cronin, M.T.D., Mazur, M., and Telser, J. (2007). Free radicals and

antioxidants in normal physiological functions and human disease. The International Journal of

Biochemistry and Cell Biology, 39(1), 44–84.

Valko, M., Rhodes, C.J., Moncol, J., Izakovic, M., and Mazur, M. (2006). Free radicals, metals and

antioxidants in oxidative stress-induced cancer. Chem. Biol. Interact., 160, 1–40.

Van de Braak, S.A.A.J., and Leijten, G.C.J.J. (1999). Essential Oils and Oleoresins: A Survey in the

Netherlands and other Major Markets in the European Union. CBI, Centre for the Promotion of

Importsfrom Developing Countries, Rotterdam. 116.

Virendra, V., Panpatil, S., Tattari, N., Kota, C., and Nimgulkar, K.P. (2013). In vitro evaluation on

antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of spice extracts of ginger, turmeric and garlic. Journal of

Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 2(3), 143-148.

Page 44: Final week report (LFS1827)

36

Wahyu, W., Caroline, T.S., Laura, W., Dian, R.L. and Lusiana, D. (2011). Free Radicals Scavenging

Activities of Spices and Curcumin. ISBN 978-979-25-1209-0.

Watve, M.G., Tichoo, R., Jog, M.M. and Bhole, B.D. (2001). How many antibiotics are produced by the

genus Streptomyces. Arch Microbiol, 176, 386-90.

Westh, H., Zinn, C.S. and Rosdahl, V.T. (2004). An international multicenter study of antimicrobial

consumption and resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolates from 15 hospitals in 14 countries. Microb.

Drug Resist., 10, 169-176.

Wilker, M.A., Low, D.E., Cockerill, F.R., Sheehan, D.J., Craig, W.A., and Tenover, F.C. (2006).

Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically;

approvedstandard-seventh edition, Vol 26. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M7-A7,

Wayne.

Wright, G.D. (2005). Bacterial Resistance to Antibiotic: Enzymatic Degradation and Modifications. Adv.

Drug Delivery Rev., 57, 1451–1470.

Young, I.S., and Woodside, J.V. (2001). Antioxidants in health and disease. J Clin Pathol., 54, 176–186.

Ziech, D., Franco, R., Georgakilas, A.G., Georgakila, S., Schoneveld, V.M.O., Pappa, A., and

Panayiotidis, M.I. (2010). The role of reactive oxygen species and oxidative stress in environmental

carcinogenesis and biomarker development. Chemico-Biological Interactions, 188(2), 334–339.

Zotchev, S.B. (2011). Marine actinomycetes as an emerging resource for the drug development pipelines.

J Biotechnol, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2011.1006.1002.