final submission of br 2

Upload: ankur-meruliya

Post on 05-Apr-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    1/48

    A

    PROJECT REPORT ON

    A study of to measure customer satisfaction level towards Bajaj Alliance

    UNDERTAKEN AT

    Bajaj Alliance, Place: - Bardoli

    SUBMITTED BY

    Group No. Id No. Enrollment No. Name of Students

    11MBA099 201104100710097 Agaraval Narendra H.

    11MBA100 201104100710098 Vishnoi Seema B.

    11MBA101 201104100710099 Dholakiya Ashok

    11MBA102 201104100710100 Meruliya Ankur

    SUBMITTED TO

    Dr.Prashant Joshi, Professor, SRIMCA

    Mr.JiteshParmar, Assistant Professor, SRIMCA

    FOR THE SUBJECT

    040070201 - Business Research II (Fieldwork)

    MBA Semester II

    [2011-2013]

    Department of Management

    ShrimadRajchandra Institute of Management and Computer Application

    Uka Tarsadia University, Tarsadi.

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    2/48

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    We are student of management faculty studying in F.Y.M.B.A in Shrimad

    Rajchandra Institute of Management &Computer Application, Tarsadi, Dist-

    Surat. We fell great pleasure to prepare this report at this stage, Which is

    outcome of we and others who helped throughout the preparation. We hope

    that will acknowledge this project.

    We are extremely grateful to Director Dr. Shivendra Gupta, We college

    mentors (Dr.Prashant Joshi and Mr.JiteshParmar), Mr.Gunjan Shah,

    Mr.Gautam Donga who have given necessary guidance at every stage of we

    project, so here by we thanking them.

    I am sincerely thankful to the manager Mr. Prashant Shah, we company

    mentor Ms. Rita Gupta and other officer of the unit for providing we necessary

    information about the organization, Which WE have incorporated in this

    report.

    AGARAVAL NARENDRA (11MBA099)

    VISHNOI SEEMA (11MBA100)

    DHOLAKIYA ASHOK (11MBA101)

    MERULIYA ANKUR (11MBA102)

    .

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    3/48

    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

    About the topic:

    Insurance provider monetary compensation against a predetermined risk. Aninsurance company offer such protection for a payment (or premium). It is also

    the amount the insurance company agrees to pay when an unfortunate event

    occurs. Insurance is a benefit to the society at large by allowing individuals to

    share the risks faced by many people. An insurance policy is a written

    agreement between an insurance company and an individual or organization

    that requires insurance. The insurance policy sets out the terms and condition

    and specifies the risks that will be compensated for. Online insurance quote

    helps you to shop for insurance via the internet. It offer a quick, safe and

    convenient method to shop for insurance from the comfort of your home.

    Research objective:

    To measure consumer satisfaction level towards Bajaj Alliance. To identify different services provided by the company.

    .

    Research methodology:

    Descriptive research design was used and 100 samples was taken. The data are

    collected on primary and secondary basis. Primary data were collected with

    the help of structured questioner field by respondent. Secondary data were

    collected from internet and books.

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    4/48

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    ChapterNo.

    Particulars Page Nos.

    - Acknowledgements

    - Executive Summary

    1 Introduction

    2 Literature Review

    3 Objectives and Research Methodology

    4 Data Interpretation and Analysis

    5 Findings

    6 Conclusion

    7 Recommendations

    8 References

    - ANNEXURES

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    5/48

    INTRODUCTION TO THE ORGANIZATION

    Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company Limited is a union between worlds

    two leading conglomerates Allianz SE, one of the worlds largest insurance

    companies and Bajaj Auto, one of the biggest 2 and 3 wheeler manufactures

    in the world. Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance co. Ltd. Was incorporated on March

    12, 2001. The company received the insurance Regulatory and Development

    Authority (IRDA) certificate of Registration (R3) No 116 on August 3, 2001 to

    conducted Life Insurance business in India.

    ABOUT ALLIANZ GROUP:-Allianz group was founded in 1890 in Berlin and is one of leading

    providers of insurance and asset management products and services

    worldwide. Allianz se is amongst the largest assets managers in the world

    managing worth over 996 billion Eros (Rs. 53, 64,456crore). Allianz SE has 115

    years of financial experience in over 70 countries. Allianz Group provides its

    more than 60 million customers worldwide with a comprehensive range of

    services in the areas of

    Property and Casualty Insurance, Life and Health Insurance, Assets Management and Banking.

    ABOUT BAJAJ AUTO:-Bajaj Auto Limited is the flagship company of Bajaj Group which was

    incorporated in the year 1945 as Bachraj Trading Corporation. It is one of the

    Indias largest two and three wheeler manufacturer and the fourth largest

    manufacturer of two wheelers in the world with an annual turnover of Rs.

    42.16 billion. Bajaj Auto has been in operation for over 55 years. As promoters

    of Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd., Bajaj Auto has

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    6/48

    The following to offers:

    Vast distribution network. Knowledge of Indian consumers. Financial strength and stability to support the insurance business. Visit Bajaj Autos website. A strong brandequity. A good market reputation as a world class organization. Adequate experience of running a large organization. A 10 million strong base of retail customers using Bajaj products. Advanced information technology in extensive use. Experience in the financial services industry through Bajaj Auto

    Finance Ltd.

    VISION:-To be the BEST Life Insurance Company in India

    To Buy from, Work for & Invest in.

    BAJAJ ALLIANZ LIFE INSURANCE:- The New leader in Private sector life insurance Bajaj Alliance Life is No. 1 among other private life insurers with over

    Rs. 703,478 crore lead.

    New Business Premium of Rs.3466 crore a 29% growth over previousyear.

    Industry Market share of 8.0%.

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    7/48

    Positive aspects of Bajaj Allianz:- Wide Network and Large Sales Force

    Decentralization

    Enabling IT Infrastructure Banc assurance Ties-up with UAE Exchange Micro insurance products

    IRDA Certificates:-Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Co. Ltd was granted renewal of IRDA

    Certification on 28th

    March 2006.

    Bajaj Allianz A growing force:- The growing private life insurance company in India, with a growth

    rate of 95% as per the IRDA results for financial year 2009-10.

    Sales of over 2.6 billion policies to satisfied customers. A country wide network of 1200+ branch Assets under the management Rs. 171,57 crore Shareholders capital base of Rs. 1210 crore

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    8/48

    Years No. of policies sold in

    Fiscal year

    gwp in Fiscal year

    (Rs .in cr.)

    2001

    2002 21,376 7

    2002 2003 1,15,965 69

    2003 2004 1,86,443 221

    2004 -2005 2,88,189 1002

    2005 2006 7,81,685 3134

    2006 -2007 20,79,217 4269

    2007 2008 3744742 9725

    2008 2009 2590765 10,625

    2009 2010 2230686 11,420

    Bajaj Allianz The Milestones:- One of the fast growing private life insurance Companies in India with over 107% growth for last year in succession. Currently ranked third amongst private sector life insurance

    companies as per the IRDA results for April 2009- January 2010 for few

    business market shares.

    It covers 40, 00,000 satisfied customers. The company was first totouch 1, 00,000 and 2, 00,000 customers mark amongst private

    insurance companies.

    Present in more than 1163 branches and with 2.50 lacs + insuranceconsultants, providing the finest customer services.

    It gross premium collections last financial year2009-10 were Rs. 11420crore or a growth of 99%.

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    9/48

    At present it has a product portfolio of 26 products and a capital baseof Rs.7234 crore, with a market share of 5.2% on premium base and

    5.1% on policy base.

    Geared to perform:- Product tailored to suit customers needs. Decentralized organizational structure enables faster response. Wide reach to serve customers better- a network of 1100+ branches

    across the India.

    Specialized departments for Bancassurence, corporate Agency andGroup Business.

    Well networked with state of the- art IT systems. High standards of customer services & simplifying claim settlement

    process in the industry.

    Website to provide assistance and information across all products andservices, online buying and online renewals

    Toll-free number to answer customers queries, accessible fromanywhere in the country.

    A strong Telemarketing and direct marketing team.

    Network to reach:- Strong network in over 840 towns and growing every day. Over 9000+ Sales Team Managers In 2010 , 2 TOT, 8 COT , and 428 MDRT qualifiers Over 40, 00,000 satisfied customers.

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    10/48

    UNDER STANDING THE BUSINESS AND WORKING OF THECOMPANY

    In the Bajaj Allianz Life insurance co. Ltd are working in the following

    ways:

    AGENCY CHANNEL:

    A country wide network of 966 total offices. Over 9000 sales managers. Over 2.5 lakhs insurance consultants. Business contribution to BALIC-70%

    BANKASSURENCE:

    Offices/ hubs: 13 No of employees: 959 Contribution to BALIC Business: 10%ALTERNATE CHANNELES:

    Corporate Insurance Consultants:

    -Team life care

    - ECPL

    -Golden Enterprises

    -Life sure consultancy

    Brokers:-

    -Bajaj capital

    -SMC insurance

    - AR insurance brokers

    FRANCHISEES:

    V. Aparna Reddy

    Dilip Kumar

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    11/48

    LITERATURE REVIEW

    P. Muthulakshmi conducted a study on Satisfaction of insured in Private

    Insurance Company Ltd.. The objectives were to examine the satisfaction ofthe insured, to study the performance of private insurance company and to

    offer suitable suggestions. She found not that, most of the respondents were

    of the viewthat, the advertisement about the policies of insurance is

    inadequate. Hence it was suggested that, the information regarding the

    insurance policies are to be advertised through notices, postures and banners.

    She found that the people in rural area are illiterates. The proposal forms and

    claim forms were printed only in English. Rural people could not read and

    understand it. So it was suggested that the insurance companies should print

    the forms in Tamil or both in English and Tamil.

    Dr. N. Raman & Ms. C. Gayathri conducted a study on A Study on Customers

    Satisfaction towards New Insurance Companies and they concluded that life

    insurance is a contract for payment of a sum of money to the person assured

    on the happening of the event insured against. Usually the contract provides

    for the payment of premium periodically to the corporation by the assured.Life insurance is universally acknowledged to be an institution, which

    eliminated risk. It certainly substitutes for uncertainty and comes to the

    timely aid of the family in the unfortunate event of death of the breadwinner.

    By and large, life insurances civilizations partial solution to the problems

    caused by death.

    Customer service has become a distinct component of both product and

    service sectors and with the developments in information technology many

    businesses find demanding and knowledgeable customers. The worldwide

    trend toward service quality was initiated in the 1880s when businesses

    realized that a quality product, in itself, is not guaranteed to maintain

    competitive advantage (van der Wal et al., 2002). Many researchers recognize

    that service quality can bring an organization a lasting competitive advantage

    (Moore and Lewis). Quality of services can be the difference between success

    and failure in both service and manufacturing firms. Service quality, customer

    satisfaction and customer value have become the main concern of both

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    12/48

    manufacturing and service organizations in the increasingly intensified

    competition for customers in today's customer-cantered era (Wang et al.,

    2004).

    As a result, many organizations are paying increasing attention to improve

    service quality. In some manufacturing industries "service quality" is

    considered a more important order winner than "product quality" (Ghobadian

    et al., 1994). Service quality improvements will lead to customer satisfaction

    and cost management that result in improved profits (Stevenson, 2002).

    Contemporary service sector firms are compelled by their nature to provide

    excellent service in order to prosper in increasingly competitive domestic and

    global marketplaces (Sultan and Simpson, 2000). As service firms findthemselves in an increasingly competitive and complex business environment,

    they are inevitably driven to examine their service delivery processes critically.

    The focus of such internal analysis is ultimately about customer satisfaction,

    and how bottom-line results can be actualized through delivering quality

    services to customers via flawless interface platforms This is not only the case

    in the private sector, but it also is increasingly so in the public sector. Public

    sector firms are trying to make administration more efficient and more citizen-

    oriented (Scharitzer and Korunka, 2000).

    Source of data: http://www.trikal.org/ictbm11/pdf/ServiceIndustry/D1209-

    done.pdf

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    13/48

    Research Methodology

    Research Objectives:

    1. Primary Objective: To measure consumer satisfaction level towards Bajaj Alliance.

    2. Secondary Objective: To identify different services provided by the company. To identify the expectation of the customer.

    Research Method:

    It means which method researcher is going to use for satisfying hisobjective. Now we will see the method by which the whole research is going to

    fulfil.

    Research Design:

    Descriptive Research Design:Descriptive of phenomena or characteristics associated with the

    subject population is description research design. A descriptive study maysimple or complex. It may be done in many setting, whatever the form,

    descriptive study can be just as demanding of research skills as the causal

    study and we should insist on the same high standards for design and

    execution.

    Data collection Method:

    There are two type of data collection method.

    1. Primary Data Collection Method:For this survey primary data collection method was used. The

    primary data were collected though a structured questionnaires.

    2. Secondary data collection method:I have gained secondary data from magazine, journals,

    internet and books.

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    14/48

    Sample Size:

    This research includes 100 samples.

    Sample Techniques:

    In this research convenient sampling from non-probability convenience

    sampling technique is used.

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    15/48

    ANALYSIS

    FREQUENCY TABLEAge

    Frequency Percent Valid Percent

    Cumulative

    Percent

    Valid 20-25 31 31.0 31.0 31.0

    26-30 33 33.0 33.0 64.0

    31-35 14 14.0 14.0 78.0

    36-40 9 9.0 9.0 87.0

    >40 13 13.0 13.0 100.0

    Total 100 100.0 100.0

    INTERPRETATION:

    Customer who are in age group of 26-30 year give 33% response to invest in

    insurance sector and age group of 20-25 give 31% response to invest ininsurance sector, age group of 31-35 year give 14% response to invest in

    insurance sector.

    Gender

    Frequency Percent Valid Percent

    Cumulative

    Percent

    Valid male 82 82.0 82.0 82.0

    female 18 18.0 18.0 100.0

    Total 100 100.0 100.0

    INTERPRETATION:

    Customer who are in gender group of male give 82% response to invest in

    insurance sector, female give only 18% response to invest in insurance sector.

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    16/48

    Income level

    Frequency Percent Valid Percent

    Cumulative

    Percent

    Valid 300000 10 10.0 10.0 100.0

    Total 100 100.0 100.0

    INTERPRETATION:

    Customer who are in 200001-250000 income group of give 26% response to

    invest in insurance sector, income group of 150001-200000 give 21% response

    to invest in insurance sector, income group of

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    17/48

    Occupation

    Frequency Percent Valid Percent

    Cumulative

    Percent

    Valid professional 8 8.0 8.0 8.0

    business 42 42.0 42.0 50.0

    service 25 25.0 25.0 75.0

    retired 1 1.0 1.0 76.0

    agricultural 10 10.0 10.0 86.0

    other 14 14.0 14.0 100.0

    Total 100 100.0 100.0

    INTERPRETATION:

    Customer who are in occupation group of business 42% response to invest in

    insurance sector, service people are 25% are invest in insurance sector,and

    only 1`% response to invest in insurance sector.

    Essential of life insurance

    Frequency Percent Valid Percent

    Cumulative

    Percent

    Valid yes 97 97.0 97.0 97.0

    no 3 3.0 3.0 100.0

    Total 100 100.0 100.0

    INTERPRETATION:

    Investment in insurance sector 97% people are agree with insurance are

    necessary , and only 3% people are say no necessary of insurance sector.

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    18/48

    Kotak mahindra life insurance

    Frequency Percent Valid Percent

    Cumulative

    Percent

    Valid n0 87 87.0 87.0 87.0

    yes 13 13.0 13.0 100.0

    Total 100 100.0 100.0

    INTERPRETATION:

    People are invest in insurance sector 87% people are say they have not more

    preferred kotak Mahindra life insurance, only 13% people are said to invest in

    kotak Mahindra life insurance..

    LIC

    Frequency Percent Valid Percent

    Cumulative

    Percent

    Valid N0 51 51.0 51.0 51.0

    YES 49 49.0 49.0 100.0

    Total 100 100.0 100.0

    INTERPRETATION:

    People are invest in insurance sector 51% people are say they have not more

    preferred LIC , only 49% people are said to invest in LIC.

    BAJAJ ALLIANCE

    Frequency Percent Valid Percent

    Cumulative

    Percent

    Valid YES 100 100.0 100.0 100.0

    INTERPRETATION:

    In Bajaj alliance 100% respondents are invest in insurance sector.

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    19/48

    TATA AIG

    Frequency Percent Valid Percent

    Cumulative

    Percent

    Valid NO 91 91.0 91.0 91.0

    YES 9 9.0 9.0 100.0

    Total 100 100.0 100.0

    INTERPRETATION:

    People are invest in insurance sector 91% people are say they have not more

    preferred Tata AIG , only 9% people are said to invest in Tata AIG.

    MAX NEWYORK LIFE INSURANCE

    Frequency Percent Valid Percent

    Cumulative

    Percent

    Valid N0 87 87.0 87.0 87.0

    YES 13 13.0 13.0 100.0

    Total 100 100.0 100.0

    INTERPRETATION:

    People are invest in insurance sector 87% people are say they have not more

    preferred max newyork life insurance , only 13% people are said to invest in

    max newyork life insurance.

    HDFC LIFE INSURANCE

    Frequency Percent Valid Percent

    Cumulative

    Percent

    Valid NO 87 87.0 87.0 87.0

    YES 13 13.0 13.0 100.0

    Total 100 100.0 100.0

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    20/48

    INTERPRETATION:

    People are invest in insurance sector 87% people are say they have not more

    preferred max HDFC life insurance , only 13% people are said to invest in max

    HDFC life insurance.

    ICICI PRODENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE

    Frequency Percent Valid Percent

    Cumulative

    Percent

    Valid NO 86 86.0 86.0 86.0

    YES 14 14.0 14.0 100.0Total 100 100.0 100.0

    INTERPRETATION:

    People are invest in insurance sector 86% people are say they have not more

    preferred more ICICI prudential life insurance , only 14% people are said to

    invest in ICICI prudential life insurance.

    SBI

    Frequency Percent Valid Percent

    Cumulative

    Percent

    Valid NO 89 89.0 89.0 89.0

    YES 10 10.0 10.0 99.0

    3 1 1.0 1.0 100.0

    Total 100 100.0 100.0

    INTERPRETATION:

    People are invest in insurance sector 89% people are say they have not more

    preferred SBI life insurance , only 11% people are said to invest in SBI life

    insurance.

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    21/48

    RATE OF RETURN

    Frequency Percent Valid Percent

    Cumulative

    Percent

    Valid HIGHLY SATISFIED 49 49.0 49.0 49.0

    SATISFIED 44 44.0 44.0 93.0

    NEUTRAL 6 6.0 6.0 99.0

    DISSATISFIED 1 1.0 1.0 100.0

    Total 100 100.0 100.0

    INTERPRETATION:Customer who are in insurance sector 49% people rate of return of Bajaj

    alliance are highly satisfied, 445%of people are satisfied of the rate of return,

    and only 1% people are not interested in rate of return.

    MATURITY BENEFIT

    Frequency Percent Valid Percent

    Cumulative

    Percent

    Valid highly satisfied 26 26.0 26.0 26.0

    satisfied 45 45.0 45.0 71.0

    neutral 28 28.0 28.0 99.0

    highly dissatisfied 1 1.0 1.0 100.0

    Total 100 100.0 100.0

    INTERPRETATION:

    Customer who are in insurance sector 45% people maturity benefits of Bajaj

    alliance are satisfied, 28% of people are neutral of the maturity benefit, and

    only 1% people are highly dissatisfied .

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    22/48

    Surrender benefit

    Frequency Percent Valid Percent

    Cumulative

    Percent

    Valid highly satisfied 17 17.0 17.0 17.0

    satisfied 48 48.0 48.0 65.0

    neutral 28 28.0 28.0 93.0

    dissatisfied 6 6.0 6.0 99.0

    highly dissatisfied 1 1.0 1.0 100.0

    Total 100 100.0 100.0

    INTERPRETATION:

    Customer who are in insurance sector 48% people surrender benefits of bajaj

    alliance are satisfied, 28% of people are neutral of the surrender benefit, and

    only 1% people are highly dissatisfied .

    Tax benefit

    Frequency Percent Valid Percent

    Cumulative

    Percent

    Valid highly satisfied 21 21.0 21.0 21.0

    satisfied 41 41.0 41.0 62.0

    neutral 27 27.0 27.0 89.0

    dissatisfied 11 11.0 11.0 100.0

    Total 100 100.0 100.0

    INTERPRETATION:

    Customer who are in insurance sector 41% people tax benefits of Bajaj alliance

    are satisfied, 27% of people are neutral of the maturity benefit, and only 11%

    people are highly dissatisfied .

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    23/48

    Tax transparency

    Frequency Percent Valid Percent

    Cumulative

    Percent

    Valid 0 1 1.0 1.0 1.0

    highly satisfied 18 18.0 18.0 19.0

    satisfied 30 30.0 30.0 49.0

    neutral 41 41.0 41.0 90.0

    dissatisfied 10 10.0 10.0 100.0

    Total 100 100.0 100.0

    INTERPRETATION:

    Customer who are in insurance sector 41% people are tax transparency of Bajaj

    alliance are neutral, 30% of people are satisfied of the tax trsparency, and only

    10% people are highly dissatisfied .

    Risk

    Frequency Percent Valid Percent

    Cumulative

    Percent

    Valid highly satisfied 16 16.0 16.0 16.0

    satisfied 52 52.0 52.0 68.0

    neutral 25 25.0 25.0 93.0

    dissatisfied 5 5.0 5.0 98.0

    highly dissatisfied 2 2.0 2.0 100.0

    Total 100 100.0 100.0

    INTERPRETATION:

    customer who are in insurance sector 52% people risk of Bajaj alliance are

    satisfied, 25% of people are neutral of the risk, and only 2% people are highly

    dissatisfied .

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    24/48

    Procedure follow

    Frequency Percent Valid Percent

    Cumulative

    Percent

    Valid highly satisfied 17 17.0 17.0 17.0

    satisfied 29 29.0 29.0 46.0

    neutral 41 41.0 41.0 87.0

    dissatisfied 11 11.0 11.0 98.0

    highly dissatisfied 2 2.0 2.0 100.0

    Total 100 100.0 100.0

    INTERPRETATION:

    Customer who are in insurance sector 41% people procedure follow of Bajaj

    alliance are neutral, 29% of people are satisfied of the procedure follow, and

    only 2% people are highly dissatisfied .

    Procedure money back

    Frequency Percent Valid Percent

    Cumulative

    Percent

    Valid highly satisfied 14 14.0 14.0 14.0

    satisfied 42 42.0 42.0 56.0

    neutral 37 37.0 37.0 93.0

    dissatisfied 6 6.0 6.0 99.0

    highly dissatisfied 1 1.0 1.0 100.0

    Total 100 100.0 100.0

    INTERPRETATION:

    Customer who are in insurance sector 42% people are procedure for money

    back of Bajaj alliance are satisfied, 37% of people are neutral of procedure for

    money back, and only 1% people are highly dissatisfied .

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    25/48

    Death benefit

    Frequency Percent Valid Percent

    Cumulative

    Percent

    Valid highly satisfied 17 17.0 17.0 17.0

    satisfied 42 42.0 42.0 59.0

    neutral 24 24.0 24.0 83.0

    dissatisfied 12 12.0 12.0 95.0

    highly dissatisfied 5 5.0 5.0 100.0

    Total 100 100.0 100.0

    INTERPRETATION:

    Customer who are in insurance sector 42% people are death benefit of Bajaj

    alliance are satisfied, 24% of people are neutral of procedure for money back,

    and 17% people are highly satisfied, only 5% are highly dissatisfied.

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    26/48

    (1)Do you think is it essential to have life Insurance?Essential of life insurance

    Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

    Percent

    Valid yes 97 97.0 97.0 97.0

    no 3 3.0 3.0 100.0

    Total 100 100.0 100.0

    INTERPRETATION:

    Investment in insurance sector 97% people are agree with insurance are

    necessary , and only 3% people are say no necessary of insurance sector.

    (2) Which are the companies you invested your money for life insurance?

    Multiple Responses

    Case Summary

    Cases

    Valid Missing Total

    N Percent N Percent N Percent

    Lifeinsurancea

    100 100.0% 0 .0% 100 100.0%

    a. Dichotomy group tabulated at value 1.

    Case summary table display the number of cases that include the valid, missing

    and total value of all media, other additives and brand. Here total number of

    valid value is 100 and percent is 100%.

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    27/48

    $Lifeinsurance Frequencies

    Responses Percent of

    CasesN Percent

    Invested

    company

    Kotak Mahindra life

    insurance13 5.9% 13.0%

    Lic 49 22.2% 49.0%

    BAJAJ ALLIANCE 100 45.2% 100.0%

    TATA AIG 9 4.1% 9.0%

    MAX NEWYORK LIFE

    INSURANCE

    13 5.9% 13.0%

    HDFC LIFE INSURANCE 13 5.9% 13.0%

    ICICI PRODENTIAL LIFE

    INSURANCE14 6.3% 14.0%

    SBI 10 4.5% 10.0%

    Total 221 100.0% 221.0%

    a. Dichotomy group tabulated at value

    1.

    life insurance frequencies table display the people are which companies invest

    the money. Here total 221 responses, out of this responses 100people are

    prefer a Bajaj alliance , 49 people are prefer a lic, 14 people of response for the

    ICICI prudential life insurance, and 13 people are response for respectively

    kotak Mahindra, max newyork, HDFC life insurance, and only 9 people are

    response for Tata AIG.

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    28/48

    (3)Which of the following plan you have take?

    Occupation * PLAN TAKEN

    Crosstab

    Count

    PLAN TAKEN

    Total

    ULIP

    PLAN

    CHILD

    PLAN

    PENSION

    PLAN OTHER

    occupatio

    n

    profession

    al

    2 1 4 1 8

    business 11 20 7 4 42

    service 10 6 7 2 25

    retired 0 0 1 0 1

    agricultura

    l1 3 6 0 10

    other 5 2 2 5 14

    Total 29 32 27 12 100

    INTERPRETATION:

    Customer who are in professional field 4 respondent are taken pension plan,

    business field 20 respondents are taken plan for the child plan, in service

    sector respondent 10 respondents are take ULIP plan, retired respondent are

    taken pension plan, agriculture respondents are 6 respondents take also

    pension plan.

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    29/48

    Chi-Square Tests

    Value df

    Asymp. Sig.

    (2-sided)

    Pearson Chi-Square 27.825a 15 .023

    Likelihood Ratio 26.360 15 .034

    Linear-by-Linear

    Association1.481 1 .224

    N of Valid Cases 100

    a. 17 cells (70.8%) have expected count lessthan 5. The minimum expected count is .12.

    INTERPRETATION:

    Null hypothesis (H0): There is a no significance association between

    occupation and plan in Bajaj alliance insurance.

    Alternative hypothesis (H1): There is a significance association between

    occupation and plan in Bajaj alliance insurance.

    INTERPRETATION:I have used 95% level. C.I from the above table we can see that rhe value is

    .023 which is less than .05 so, the null hypotheses is rejected and there is

    association between occupation and plan.

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    30/48

    Education qualification * PLAN TAKEN

    Crosstab

    CountPLAN TAKEN

    TotalULIP PLAN

    CHILD

    PLAN

    PENSION

    PLAN OTHER

    education

    qualification

    school final 10 16 12 0 38

    Graduate 7 9 12 3 31

    post

    graduate 11 7 2 8 28

    professional

    degree1 0 1 1 3

    Total 29 32 27 12 100

    INTERPRETATION:

    Customer who are in school final 16 respondent are taken child plan, graduate

    12 respondents are taken plan for the child pension plan, in post graduate

    respondent 12 respondents are take pension plan, professional degree

    respondent 1 respectively are taken pension plan, ulip plan, other plan.

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    31/48

    Chi-Square Tests

    Value df

    Asymp. Sig.

    (2-sided)

    Pearson Chi-Square 22.510a 9 .007

    Likelihood Ratio 27.227 9 .001

    Linear-by-Linear

    Association1.252 1 .263

    N of Valid Cases 100

    a. 7 cells (43.8%) have expected count less than 5.

    The minimum expected count is .36.

    INTERPRETATION:

    Null hypothesis (H0): There is a no significance association between education

    level and plan in Bajaj alliance insurance.

    Alternative hypothesis (H1): There is a significance association between

    education level and plan in Bajaj alliance insurance.

    INTERPRETATION:I have used 95% level. C.I from the above table we can see that rhe value is

    .007 which is less than .05 so, the null hypotheses is rejected and there is

    association between education level and plan.

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    32/48

    Income level * PLAN TAKEN

    Crosstab

    CountPLAN TAKEN

    Total

    ULIP

    PLAN

    CHILD

    PLAN

    PENSION

    PLAN OTHER

    income

    level

    300000 5 2 3 0 10

    Total 29 32 27 12 100

    INTERPRETATION:

    Customer who are in income level < 100000 income 3 respondents are take

    other plan,100001-150000, 8 respondents are take pension plan,150001-

    200000, 7 respondents are take child plan,200001-250000, 10 respondents are

    respectively take ULIP plan and child plan. 250001-300000, 8 respondents are

    take child plan, >300000 are taken ULIP plan more.

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    33/48

    Chi-Square Tests

    Value df

    Asymp. Sig.

    (2-sided)

    Pearson Chi-Square 22.416a 15 .097

    Likelihood Ratio 22.336 15 .099

    Linear-by-Linear

    Association5.086 1 .024

    N of Valid Cases 100

    a. 13 cells (54.2%) have expected count less than 5.

    The minimum expected count is .72.

    INTERPRETATION:

    Null hypothesis (H0): There is a no significance association between income

    level and plan in Bajaj alliance insurance.

    Alternative hypothesis (H1): There is a significance association between

    income level and plan in Bajaj alliance insurance.

    INTERPRETATION:I have used 95% level. C.I from the above table we can see that the value is

    .097 which is greater than .05 so, the null hypotheses is accepted and there is

    no association between income level and plan.

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    34/48

    Gender * PLAN TAKEN

    Crosstab

    CountPLAN TAKEN

    Total

    ULIP

    PLAN

    CHILD

    PLAN

    PENSION

    PLAN OTHER

    gender male 21 28 24 9 82

    female 8 4 3 3 18

    Total 29 32 27 12 100

    INTEORETATION:

    Customer who are in gender group male respondent are 28 respondents take

    child plan and 24 respondents take pension plan and 21 respondents are take

    ULIP plan, others plan take only 9 respondents. and in gender group female

    respondents are 8 respondents are take ULIP plan and 4 respondents are take

    child plan.

    Chi-Square Tests

    Value df

    Asymp. Sig.

    (2-sided)

    Pearson Chi-Square 3.728a

    3 .292

    Likelihood Ratio 3.670 3 .299

    Linear-by-Linear

    Association.593 1 .441

    N of Valid Cases 100

    a. 2 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5.

    The minimum expected count is 2.16.

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    35/48

    INTERPRETATION:

    Null hypothesis (H0): There is a no significance association between gender

    and plan in Bajaj alliance insurance.

    Alternative hypothesis (H1): There is a significance association between

    gender and plan in Bajaj alliance insurance.

    INTERPRETATION:

    I have used 95% level. C.I from the above table we can see that rhe value is

    .292 which is greater than .05 so, the null hypotheses is accepted and there is

    no association between gender and plan.

    Age * PLAN TAKEN

    Crosstab

    Count

    PLAN TAKEN

    Total

    ULIP

    PLAN

    CHILD

    PLAN

    PENSION

    PLAN OTHER

    age 20-25 10 6 9 6 31

    26-30 10 14 5 4 33

    31-35 6 4 3 1 14

    36-40 1 4 3 1 9

    >40 2 4 7 0 13

    Total 29 32 27 12 100

    INTERPRETATION:

    Customer who are in age group of 26-30, 14 people give response to take child

    plan and 10 people response to ULIP plan, 20-25 age, 10 respondent who are

    taken ULIP plan, 31-35, 6 age respondent who are taken the also ULIP plan,

    >40, 7 respondent give response to take pension plan.

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    36/48

    Chi-Square Tests

    Value df

    Asymp. Sig.

    (2-sided)

    Pearson Chi-Square 14.814a

    12 .252

    Likelihood Ratio 16.207 12 .182

    Linear-by-Linear

    Association.027 1 .871

    N of Valid Cases 100

    a. 14 cells (70.0%) have expected count less than 5.

    The minimum expected count is 1.08.

    INTERPRETATION:

    Null hypothesis (H0): There is a no significance association between age and

    plan in Bajaj alliance insurance.

    Alternative hypothesis (H1): There is a significance association between age

    and plan in Bajaj alliance insurance.

    INTERPRETATION:

    I have used 95% level. C.I from the above table we can see that the value is

    0.252 which is greater than .05 so, the null hypotheses is accepted and there is

    no association between age and plan.

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    37/48

    (4) Which criteria you take into consideration while investing in bajaj

    alliance policy?

    Factor Analysis

    KMO and Bartlett's Test

    Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling

    Adequacy..619

    Bartlett's Test of

    Sphericity

    Approx. Chi-Square 104.595

    Df 36

    Sig. .000

    KMO & Bartletts test table displays the results for interpreting the adequacy

    of data for factor analysis. The P value of Bartletts test of sphericity should be

    less than 0.05. In this example the value of KMO test is 0.619 and the p value

    of Bartletts test is 0.000.

    Communalities

    Initial

    Extractio

    n

    RATE OF RETURN 1.000 .623

    MATURITY BENEFIT 1.000 .501

    surrender benefit 1.000 .275

    tax benefit 1.000 .549

    tax trasparency 1.000 .599

    risk 1.000 .627

    procedure follow 1.000 .530

    procedure fmoney

    back1.000 .450

    death benefit 1.000 .664

    Extraction Method: Principal

    Component Analysis.

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    38/48

    Communalities mean the proportion of variance due to common factors and

    shared by several items. Communalities help estimate the variance that is

    unique to each variable; this uniqueness is calculated by total variance

    explained by the variable minus the communality of that variable.

    Total Variance Explained

    Compone

    nt

    Initial Eigenvalues

    Extraction Sums of

    Squared Loadings

    Rotation Sums of

    Squared Loadings

    Tota

    l

    % of

    Varian

    ce

    Cumulati

    ve %

    Tota

    l

    % of

    Varian

    ce

    Cumulati

    ve %

    Tota

    l

    % of

    Varian

    ce

    Cumulati

    ve %

    1 2.30

    225.575 25.575

    2.30

    225.575 25.575

    1.92

    821.425 21.425

    2 1.38

    915.431 41.006

    1.38

    915.431 41.006

    1.45

    916.213 37.638

    3 1.12

    912.540 53.546

    1.12

    912.540 53.546

    1.43

    215.908 53.546

    4 .951 10.562 64.1085 .844 9.380 73.488

    6 .742 8.245 81.732

    7 .693 7.705 89.438

    8 .523 5.809 95.246

    9 .428 4.754 100.000

    Extraction Method: Principal

    Component Analysis.

    Total variance explained table displays the total variance, percentage variance

    and cumulative percentage variance for both rotated and unroasted

    components. The cumulative variance for both the unroasted and rotated

    components is 53.546 percent. Component 1 accounts for 21.425 percent of

    total variance, component 2 accounts for 16.213 percent of total variance, and

    component 3 accounts for 15.908 percent for total variance in the model. The

    cumulative percentage of variance of unroasted as well as rotated components

    is always same.

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    39/48

    Component Matrix

    Component

    1 2 3

    RATE OF RETURN .618 -.106 -.480

    MATURITY BENEFIT .537 -.331 -.322

    surrender benefit .487 .182 .064

    tax benefit .504 -.513 .178

    tax transparency .721 -.279 .032

    risk .284 .642 -.366

    procedure follow .405 .593 -.119procedure money

    back.373 .333 .448

    death benefit .486 .138 .639

    Extraction Method: Principal Component

    Analysis.

    a. 3 components extracted.

    Component matrix table shows the three components that are extracted. Theunroasted component matrix displays the correlation between variables and

    extracted components. These correlations are known as factor loadings.

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    40/48

    Rotated Component Matrixa

    Component

    1 2 3

    RATE OF RETURN .705 -.100 .340

    MATURITY BENEFIT .702 -.070 .055

    surrender benefit .270 .351 .281

    tax benefit .599 .276 -.338

    tax trasparency .701 .328 -.006

    risk .021 .011 .792

    procedure follow .058 .263 .676procedure fmoney

    back-.028 .644 .189

    death benefit .096 .809 -.024

    Extraction Method: Principal Component

    Analysis.

    Rotation Method: Varian with Kaiser

    Normalization.

    a. Rotation converged in 5 iterations.

    Rotated component matrix, each number represents the partial correlation

    coefficient between variable and the rotated component. In our example of,

    the investing Bajaj alliance policy, variables constituting component 1 are:

    Rate of return, Maturity benefits, Surrender benefits, Tax benefits, Tax

    transparency, Risk, Procedure followed, Procedure money taking, Death

    benefits.

    The variables constituting component 2 are:

    Rate of return, Maturity benefits, Surrender benefits, Tax benefits, Tax

    transparency, Risk, Procedure followed, Procedure money taking, Death

    benefits.

    The variables constituting component 3 are:

    Rate of return, Maturity benefits, Surrender benefits, Tax benefits, Tax

    transparency, Risk, Procedure followed, Procedure money taking, Deathbenefits.

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    41/48

    Component Transformation

    Matrix

    Comp

    onent 1 2 3

    1 .790 .517 .330

    2 -.510 .255 .821

    3 -.341 .817 -.465

    Extraction Method: Principal

    Component Analysis.

    Rotation Method: Varian with

    Kaiser Normalization.

    The component transformation matrix table displays the specific rotation

    applied to the components. Rotated factor loadings are obtained by

    multiplying the unroasted factor loadings matrix with component

    transformation matrix.

    Since factor 1 can be renamed Short term benefits

    Since factor 2 can be renamed long term benefits

    Since factor 3 can be renamed investment decision.

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    42/48

    FINDINGS

    Majority of in age group of 26 -30 age people are more invest in insurance

    sector.

    Majority of in gender group of male are more invest in insurance sector.

    Majority of in income level group of 200001- 250000 income people are more

    invest in insurance sector.

    Majority of in group of education school final people are more invest in

    insurance sector.

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    43/48

    CONCLUSION

    From the above analysis and interpretation we can conclude that the customer

    are satisfied with the return, tax benefit, procedure for taking money back,

    risk covered by the policy. Policy of customer has not matured so we cannot

    measure the maturity benefits, death benefits.

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    44/48

    RECOOENDATION

    I would like to recommend that company should collect the premium from the

    banks also so that customer can easily pay their premium.

    A customer of child plan can become their money I lesser time period so

    company should keep their maturity period short.

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    45/48

    REFERENCES

    BOOK:

    -Black k, (2004) businessstatistics, willey India publication.

    -SPSS for windows step by step, tenth edition, Darren George, palu mallery.

    WEBSITES:

    http://www.bajajalliancz.com

    http://www.bajajalliancz.com/http://www.bajajalliancz.com/http://www.bajajalliancz.com/
  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    46/48

    ANNEXURES

    QUESTIONNIRE

    We are studying in MBA at SRIMCA , Bardoli conducting this survey on To

    measure consumer satisfaction level toward Bajaj Alliance I need some data

    from you and it is just for an academic purpose. I ensure you that the data

    which are collected by the will remain highly confidential.

    Personal Information

    Name :______________________________ Contact No. :______________

    Place: __________________ Age (In years):_____________

    Gender : Male Female

    Income Level : (Yearly)

    300,000

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    47/48

    Education Qualification:

    School Final Graduate Post GraduateProfessional Degree

    Occupation:

    Professional Business Service Retired

    Agricultural Other: _____________________________

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    1. Do you think is it essential to have Life Insurance?

    YES__________________ NO_____________________

    2. Which are the companies you invested your money for Life Insurance?

    a) Kotak Mahindra Life Insurance

    b) LIC

    c) Bajaj Allianz

    d) Tata AIG

    e) Max New York Life Insurance

    f) HDFC Life Insurance

    g) ICICI Prudential Life Insurance

    h) SBI

    3. Which of the following plan you have taken?

    ULIP plan child plan

    Pension plan other____________

  • 7/31/2019 Final Submission of Br 2

    48/48