final report - 348 john xxiii dd · project no. 1025760 . project no. 1025760 report to toronto...
TRANSCRIPT
FINAL REPORT Asbestos-Containing Building Material Assessment Toronto Catholic District School Board
Blessed John XXIII Catholic School, 175 Grenoble Drive North York, Ontario
PROJECT NO. 1025760
PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board
80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario
M2N 6E8
FOR Asbestos-Containing Building Materials Assessment – Final Report
ON Blessed John XXIII Catholic School 175 Grenoble Drive
North York, Ontario
March 14, 2008
Jacques Whitford 7271 Warden Avenue
Markham, Ontario L3R 5X5
Phone: 905-474-7700
Fax: 905-479-9326
www.jacqueswhitford.com
© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 March 14, 2008 i
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Jacques Whitford Limited (Jacques Whitford) was commissioned by the Toronto Catholic District School Board (TCDSB) to conduct an Asbestos-Containing Building Materials Assessment of Blessed John XXIII Catholic School, located at 175 Grenoble Drive in North York, Ontario.
The purpose of the assessment was to assist the TCDSB to meet the requirements of the new asbestos regulation, Ontario Regulation 278/05 made under the Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA), effective November 1, 2005. The assessment also includes the identification of asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) that may require special attention.
The assessment was performed for the purposes of long term management of asbestos, and not for construction or renovations purposes. Additional intrusive testing may be required prior to using this information for construction or renovation.
The work was carried out in accordance with the requirements of the OHSA.
Based on visual assessment and laboratory analysis, asbestos-containing materials were identified to be present at the subject facility. Table 1 below provides a summary of the materials identified and recommendations on their management.
Table 1 – Summary of Findings and Recommendations
Issue Comments Recommendation
Asbestos Friable asbestos-containing materials were identified to be present in the form of
insulating cement on pipe fittings, breeching insulation, stucco texturized material, and
2’x4’ acoustical ceiling tiles. These materials were observed to be in good condition.
Non-friable asbestos-containing materials were identified to be present in the form of
12”x12” vinyl floor tiles. These materials were observed to be in good condition.
Presumed asbestos-containing materials (PACMs) were identified to be present in the form of cement soffits, cement pipe, fire door, caulking materials, roofing materials, mastics
and chalkboards. These materials were observed to be in good condition and were
not sampled to preserve their integrity.
Prior to demolition or renovation work, undertake testing of presumed asbestos-containing materials
to determine their asbestos content. Asbestos-containing materials should be removed
prior to the start of renovation work that may impact the material, in accordance with O. Reg.
278/05. Should a material suspected to contain asbestos
fibres become uncovered during demolition or renovation activities, all work in the areas that may disturb the material should be stopped. Samples of
the suspect material should be submitted for laboratory analysis to determine if asbestos fibres are present. Confirmed asbestos materials should
be handled in accordance with O. Reg. 278/05.
The statements made in this Executive Summary text are subject to the same limitations included in the Closure Section 8.0, and are to be read in conjunction with the remainder of this report.
© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 March 14, 2008 ii
Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ i
Asbestos-Containing Building Materials Assessment ......................................................... 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Assessment Objectives .............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Scope of Work ............................................................................................................................ 1
2.0 DOCUMENT REVIEW ............................................................................................................... 2
3.0 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................. 2
4.0 ASSESSMENT LIMITATIONS .................................................................................................. 3
5.0 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ................................................................................................. 4
6.0 ASSESSMENT RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ........................................................................ 4 6.1 Friable Asbestos-Containing Materials ...................................................................................... 5 6.2 Non-Friable Asbestos-Containing Materials ............................................................................... 5 6.3 Presumed Asbestos-Containing Materials ................................................................................. 5 6.4 Non-Asbestos-Containing Materials ........................................................................................... 6
7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................................................. 6
8.0 CLOSURE .................................................................................................................................. 6
List of Tables
Table 1 – Summary of Findings and Recommendations ..................................................................... i
List of Appendices
APPENDIX 1 Floor Plans Showing Locations of Asbestos-Containing Materials ....................... 1 APPENDIX 2 Summary of Results of Analysis of Bulk Samples for Asbestos Content .............. 2 APPENDIX 3 Summary of Occurrences of Asbestos-Containing Materials ................................ 3 APPENDIX 4 Laboratory Analytical Report – Asbestos: Polarized Light Microscopy ................. 4 APPENDIX 5 Evaluation Criteria for Assessing Asbestos-Containing Materials ......................... 5 APPENDIX 6 Terms and Definitions ............................................................................................ 6 APPENDIX 7 Summary of Results of Analysis of Bulk Samples from Previous TCDSB
Asbestos Surveys (SAP inventory) ....................................................................... 7
© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 March 14, 2008 1
ASBESTOS-CONTAINING BUILDING MATERIALS ASSESSMENT
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Jacques Whitford Limited (Jacques Whitford) was commissioned by the Toronto Catholic District School Board (TCDSB) to conduct an Asbestos-Containing Building Materials Assessment of Blessed John XXIII Catholic School, located at 175 Grenoble Drive in North York, Ontario.
The purpose of the assessment was to assist the TCDSB to meet the requirements of the new asbestos regulation, Ontario Regulation 278/05 made under the Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA), effective November 1, 2005. The assessment also includes the identification of asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) that may require special attention.
The assessment was performed for the purposes of long term management of asbestos, and not for construction or renovations purposes. Additional intrusive testing may be required prior to using this information for construction or renovation.
The work was carried out in accordance with the requirements of the OHSA.
1.1 Assessment Objectives
The objective of the assessment was to:
prepare an assessment report that identifies asbestos-containing materials present at the subject facility; and,
provide recommendations for the management of these materials.
1.2 Scope of Work
The scope of work for this assessment involved the following:
a “room-by-room” visual assessment of readily accessible room spaces of the subject facility for the presence of asbestos-containing building materials;
an inventory of building materials/components that are suspected to contain asbestos;
the collection of representative bulk samples from building materials suspected of containing asbestos fibres;
laboratory analysis for the determination of the type and concentration of asbestos present in the samples submitted; and,
preparation of a report documenting the results of the assessment, providing an interpretation of the laboratory analysis results and recommendations for the management of any asbestos containing materials.
© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 March 14, 2008 2
2.0 DOCUMENT REVIEW
The SAP inventory provided by Toronto Catholic District School Board and documents on site, where available, were reviewed by Jacques Whitford.
3.0 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
A room-by-room visual assessment of the subject facility was made in order to check for the presence of materials suspected of containing asbestos.
During the assessment, locations to collect discrete bulk asbestos samples of suspect building materials were identified. Samples of representative materials were then collected at these locations in accordance with the requirements of Ontario Regulation 278/05 made under the Occupational Health and Safety Act.
An assessment of the condition, accessibility and exposure risk was completed for each occurrence of an asbestos-containing material. The Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC) document entitled “Deputy Ministers Directive 057 – Asbestos Management” (Last Revised June 16th, 1999) was used as the basis for the criteria that was applied in evaluating the presence of asbestos-containing materials at the subject areas, where applicable.
Samples of suspect ACMs from various building materials were collected and submitted to EMSL Laboratories Inc. (EMSL) located in Westmont, New Jersey, for analysis using Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) with dispersion staining. The analysis was conducted following the U.S. EPA/600/R-93/116 Methods. EMSL is certified under the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) to perform asbestos analysis of bulk samples.
The number of bulk samples was based on the requirements of the new asbestos regulation that specifies the minimum number of samples of a particular building material that should be collected and tested to consider a material non-asbestos-containing. A positive stop option was used during the laboratory analysis of the building materials suspected to contain asbestos. Multiple samples of visually similar material were collected and submitted for laboratory analysis.
The positive stop option involves testing a series of samples from a particular building material until test results indicate the presence of asbestos. When this occurs, the remaining samples are not tested. This is a cost effective method of limiting the number of samples that are ultimately tested.
Additionally, materials that had been previously sampled and identified to contain asbestos were referenced from available reports and not re-tested.
A summary list of the bulk samples collected by Jacques Whitford, including a description of the material, sampling location, type of analysis and laboratory test results is provided in Appendix 2. A summary list of the bulk samples that had been sampled previously in TCDSB surveys and identified to contain asbestos is provided in Appendix 7.
© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 March 14, 2008 3
4.0 ASSESSMENT LIMITATIONS
This report reflects the observations made within the subject facility only, and the results of analyses performed on specific materials sampled during the assessment. Analytical results reflect the sampled materials at the specific sampling locations.
The vinyl floor tile in room 122 was not sampled as it was reported by the custodian that it was installed recently.
It was also reported by the custodian that the daycare (room 123, 123A) had multiple styles of new vinyl tiles and ceiling tiles installed recently.
Due to access restrictions imposed by working in occupied and operational spaces, the asbestos content of some building materials could not be determined at some locations. Where applicable, building materials that were not sampled but that may contain asbestos include, but are not limited to the following:
sub-grade materials;
curtains;
flooring material concealed beneath carpeting, ceramic tile, brickwork, hardwood flooring and/or concealed beneath existing sub-floors;
drywall and/or wall plaster materials concealed behind new and/or additional walls;
woven tape inside duct connection joints;
inner ducting insulation;
refractory brick;
insulation material present inside walls (i.e. suspected asbestos-containing vermiculite insulation inside concrete block and/or brick walls);
pipe straight-run and pipe elbow insulation within wall cavities, inaccessible ceiling spaces or crawlspaces;
insulation materials inside fire doors;
the mechanical inner linings of heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) units; and,
heat protection materials inside mechanical installations and light fixtures.
If encountered during renovation or other activities, any suspected ACMs not identified within this report should be presumed to contain asbestos and handled as such until otherwise shown to be non asbestos-containing through analytical testing.
© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 March 14, 2008 4
5.0 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
Asbestos is included in the Designated Substances Regulations made under Ontario's OHSA. The Designated Substance Regulation respecting Asbestos (R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 837, amended to O. Reg. 279/05) primarily regulates worker exposure to asbestos during manufacturing of asbestos containing products, but also includes requirements related to respiratory equipment, measurement of airborne fibres, and medical surveillance of exposed workers.
The Ontario Regulation 278/05 made under the OHSA for Asbestos on Construction Projects and in Buildings and Repair Operations, clearly defines asbestos-containing material as a material that contains 0.5 per cent or more asbestos by dry weight. The new asbestos regulation (O. Reg. 278/05) became effective as of November 1, 2005.
The General Waste Management Regulation (O. Reg. 347/90), under the Environmental Protection Act (EPA) of Ontario, sets out the requirements for the proper disposal of asbestos waste in Ontario. The waste must be placed in a double sealed container, properly labeled, free of cuts, tears or punctures and disposed of at a licensed waste station which has been properly notified of the presence of asbestos waste.
6.0 ASSESSMENT RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The result of the assessment for asbestos-containing building materials is discussed below. The evaluation criterion for assessing asbestos-containing materials is provided in Appendix 5. A list of definitions for technical terms used in this report is provided in Appendix 6.
Asbestos-containing materials are grouped into two classifications, friable and non-friable materials. Friable ACMs are those that can easily be crumbled or broken apart by mere hand pressure. When these materials break apart asbestos fibres are then released into the atmosphere. Non-friable ACMs or “manufactured products” are materials that by the nature of their manufacturing/construction do not readily allow the release of asbestos fibres. These materials should not be cut or shaped with power tools, since this procedure may allow for the release of the asbestos fibres.
O. Reg. 278/05 requires that an Asbestos Management Program (AMP) be implemented in buildings that have been identified to contain friable and non-friable ACMs.
A summary list of the bulk samples that were collected during the assessment including a description of the material, sampling location, type of analysis and laboratory test results is provided in Appendix 2.
A summary list of the bulk samples that had been identified to contain asbestos in the SAP inventory provided by TCDSB is provided in Appendix 7.
A copy of the PLM laboratory Certificate of Analysis is provided in Appendix 4.
A summary of occurrences of asbestos-containing materials for areas that were inspected is provided in Appendix 3. Each ACM occurrence includes the following information:
room component that contains ACM;
location of the ACM within the room space;
ACM description;
© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 March 14, 2008 5
estimated quantity;
original sample number or representative sample number;
friability; and,
condition.
6.1 Friable Asbestos-Containing Materials
During the assessment, friable ACMs were identified by laboratory analysis, as well as previously identified in the SAP inventory provided by the TCDSB. Friable ACMs were observed at the subject facility in the form of:
Insulating cement on pipe fittings;
2’ x 4’ acoustical ceiling tile;
Stucco texturized material; and,
Breeching insulation.
Refer to Appendix 7 for the type and asbestos content; and Appendix 3 for specific location and condition of these ACMs.
6.2 Non-Friable Asbestos-Containing Materials
During the assessment, non-friable ACMs were identified by laboratory analysis to be present at the subject facility in the form of:
12”x12” vinyl floor tiles.
Refer to Appendix 2 and Appendix 7 for the type and asbestos content; and Appendix 3 for specific location and condition of these ACMs.
6.3 Presumed Asbestos-Containing Materials
Presumed asbestos-containing materials were observed to be present at the subject facility. The following materials were identified but not sampled:
Window and door caulking materials;
Roof caulking materials;
Roofing materials;
Mastics;
Chalkboards;
Cement pipe;
Cement soffit;
Duct insulation; and,
Fire door.
© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 March 14, 2008 6
The cement pipe and soffit were not sampled due to inaccessibility. These materials were not sampled during the assessment to avoid damage. The materials were observed to be in good condition. As these materials are known to have been manufactured with asbestos, they should be presumed to be asbestos-containing unless proven otherwise by laboratory analysis.
6.4 Non-Asbestos-Containing Materials Refer to Appendix 2 for a list of materials identified as non-asbestos containing through sampling and laboratory analysis.
7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS Based on visual assessment and laboratory analysis, Jacques Whitford recommends the following with regards to the ACMs and PACMs in the facility assessed:
Prior to demolition or renovation work, undertake testing of presumed asbestos-containing materials to determine their asbestos content;
Asbestos-containing materials should be removed prior to the start of renovation work that may impact the material, in accordance with O. Reg. 278/05;
Should a material suspected to contain asbestos fibres become uncovered during demolition or renovation activities, all work in the areas that may disturb the material should be stopped. Samples of the suspect material should be submitted for laboratory analysis to determine if asbestos fibres are present. Confirmed asbestos materials should be handled in accordance with O. Reg. 278/05.
8.0 CLOSURE This report has been prepared for the sole benefit of the Toronto Catholic District School Board. The report may not be used by any other person or entity without the express written consent of Jacques Whitford Limited and the Toronto Catholic District School Board.
Any use which a third party makes of this report, or any reliance on decisions based on it, are the responsibility of such third parties. Jacques Whitford Limited accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on this report.
The information and conclusions contained in this report are based upon work undertaken by trained professional and technical staff in accordance with generally accepted engineering and scientific practices current at the time the work was performed. Conclusions presented in this report should not be construed as legal advice.
The conclusions presented in this report represent the best technical judgment of Jacques Whitford Limited based on the data obtained from the work. The conclusions are based on the site conditions encountered by Jacques Whitford Limited at the time the work was performed at the specific assessment and/or sampling locations, and can only be extrapolated to an undefined limited area around these locations. The extent of the limited area depends on building construction and conditions,
© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 March 14, 2008 7
weather, building usage and other factors. Due to the nature of the investigation and the limited data available, Jacques Whitford Limited cannot warrant against undiscovered environmental liabilities.
If any conditions become apparent that differ significantly from our understanding of conditions as presented in this report, we request that we be notified immediately to reassess the conclusions provided herein.
We trust that the above is satisfactory for your purposes at this time. Should you have any questions or concerns, or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at your convenience.
This report was prepared by Anil Panchal and reviewed by Martin Ling and Steven D. Fulford.
Sincerely,
JACQUES WHITFORD LIMITED
Original Signed By: Original Signed By: Anil Panchal Steven D. Fulford Report Author Senior Technical Reviewer Original Signed By: Martin Ling Project Manager AP/SF/ML/dd Enclosures P:\CMiC Jobs\1025xxx\1025760\REPORTS\348 - John XXIII\Final Report - 348_John XXIII dd.docx
APPENDIX 1 Floor Plans Showing Locations of
Asbestos-Containing Materials
APPENDIX 2 Summary of Results of Analysis of Bulk Samples
for Asbestos Content
Summary of Bulk Sample Analysis for Asbestos Type and Content
SampleNumber AnalysisDescription of Sampled
MaterialAsbestos Typeand ContentSampling Location
348-BS-01A <0.25% Chrysotile PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - blue with blue flecks
Room 103
348-BS-01B <0.25% Chrysotile PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - blue with blue flecks
Room 103
348-BS-01C <0.25% Chrysotile PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - blue with blue flecks
Room 103
348-BS-02A 2% Amosite, 2% Anthophyllite, 2% Chrysotile
PLM2' x4' acoustical ceiling tile - medium fissure pinhole pattern
Room 103
348-BS-02B SP PLM2' x4' acoustical ceiling tile - medium fissure pinhole pattern
Room 104
348-BS-02C SP PLM2' x4' acoustical ceiling tile - medium fissure pinhole pattern
Room 129
348-BS-03A 5% Chrysotile PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - white with grey streaks
Room 104
348-BS-03B SP PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - white with grey streaks
Room 104A
348-BS-03C SP PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - white with grey streaks
Room 104C
348-BS-04A 0.25% Chrysotile PLMStucco texturized materialRoom 106A
348-BS-04B <0.25% Chrysotile PLMStucco texturized materialRoom 106A
348-BS-04C <0.25% Chrysotile PLMStucco texturized materialRoom 106A
348-BS-04D 8% Chrysotile PLMStucco texturized materialRoom 106A
348-BS-04E SP PLMStucco texturized materialRoom 106A
348-BS-05A 2% Chrysotile PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with brown streaks
Room 110
348-BS-05B SP PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with brown streaks
Room 111
PLM - Polarized Light Microscopy TEM - Transmission Electron MicroscopyBS - Bulk Samplend - None DetectedSP - Stop Positive (not analyzed)
1
Notes:
14-Mar-08
SampleNumber AnalysisDescription of Sampled
MaterialAsbestos Typeand ContentSampling Location
348-BS-05C SP PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with brown streaks
Room 127
348-BS-06A None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with dark streaks
Room 116
348-BS-06B None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with dark streaks
Room 117
348-BS-06C None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with dark streaks
Room 205
348-BS-07A None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with brown flecks
Corridor 115
348-BS-07B None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with brown flecks
Corridor 204
348-BS-07C None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with brown flecks
Corridor 115
348-BS-08A None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with white streaks
Room 119
348-BS-08B None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with white streaks
Room 120
348-BS-08C None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with white streaks
Room 121
348-BS-09A None Detected PLM2' x4' acoustical ceiling tile - small fissure pinhole pattern
Room 119
348-BS-09B None Detected PLM2' x4' acoustical ceiling tile - small fissure pinhole pattern
Room 115
348-BS-09C None Detected PLM2' x4' acoustical ceiling tile - small fissure pinhole pattern
Room 120
348-BS-10A None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with dark flecks
Room 122B
348-BS-10B None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with dark flecks
Room 122B
348-BS-10C None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with dark flecks
Room 122B
348-BS-11A None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - green with green flecks
Room 128
PLM - Polarized Light Microscopy TEM - Transmission Electron MicroscopyBS - Bulk Samplend - None DetectedSP - Stop Positive (not analyzed)
2
Notes:
14-Mar-08
SampleNumber AnalysisDescription of Sampled
MaterialAsbestos Typeand ContentSampling Location
348-BS-11B None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - green with green flecks
Room 129
348-BS-11C None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - green with green flecks
Room 128
348-BS-12A None Detected PLM2' x4' acoustical ceiling tile - large fissure pinhole pattern
Corridor 115
348-BS-12B None Detected PLM2' x4' acoustical ceiling tile - large fissure pinhole pattern
Corridor 115
348-BS-12C None Detected PLM2' x4' acoustical ceiling tile - large fissure pinhole pattern
Corridor 115
348-BS-13A None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - pink with pink flecks
Room 131
348-BS-13B None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - pink with pink flecks
Room 131B
348-BS-13C None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - pink with pink flecks
Corridor 131
348-BS-14A None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - green with white streaks
Room 221
348-BS-14B None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - green with white streaks
Room 222
348-BS-14C None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - green with white streaks
Room 223
348-BS-15A None Detected PLMDrywall joint-fill compoundRoom 116
348-BS-15B None Detected PLMDrywall joint-fill compoundCorridor 115
348-BS-15C None Detected PLMDrywall joint-fill compoundRoom 117
348-BS-15D None Detected PLMDrywall joint-fill compoundRoom 128
348-BS-15E None Detected PLMDrywall joint-fill compoundRoom 205
348-BS-15F None Detected PLMDrywall joint-fill compoundRoom 221
PLM - Polarized Light Microscopy TEM - Transmission Electron MicroscopyBS - Bulk Samplend - None DetectedSP - Stop Positive (not analyzed)
3
Notes:
14-Mar-08
SampleNumber AnalysisDescription of Sampled
MaterialAsbestos Typeand ContentSampling Location
348-BS-15G None Detected PLMDrywall joint-fill compoundRoom 222
348-BS-16A None Detected PLM2' x 4' acoustical ceiling tile - pinhole fissure pattern
Room 126
348-BS-16B None Detected PLM2' x 4' acoustical ceiling tile - pinhole fissure pattern
Room 126
348-BS-16C None Detected PLM2' x 4' acoustical ceiling tile - pinhole fissure pattern
Room 126
PLM - Polarized Light Microscopy TEM - Transmission Electron MicroscopyBS - Bulk Samplend - None DetectedSP - Stop Positive (not analyzed)
4
Notes:
14-Mar-08
APPENDIX 3 Summary of Occurrences of Asbestos
Containing Materials
Summary of Occurrences of Asbestos-Containing Materials
RoomSpecificLocation
ACM Type EstimatedQuantity
SampleNumber
OriginalSample?
Asbestos Content
Friable?Visible?
Access. Comments/Notes
ACMConditionLevel
ACMLocation
cement soffit 5 sq. m ns No ns No Yes C good PACM101 soffitexterior1
2' x 4' acoustical ceiling tile - medium fissure pinhole pattern
200 sq. m Ref 348-BS-02A No 2% amosite, 2% anthophylite, 2%
chrysotile
Yes Yes C good ACM101, 102, 103A, 103B, 104, 104A, 104B, 104D
ceilingceiling1
cement soffit 1 sq. m ns No ns No Yes C good PACM103 soffitexterior1
2' x 4' acoustical ceiling tile - medium fissure pinhole pattern
100 sq. m 348-BS-02A Yes 2% amosite, 2% anthophylite, 2%
chrysotile
Yes Yes C good ACM103 ceilingceiling1
duct insulation 5 ns No ns No No C good PACM103, 107A, 109, 110A, 110B
above ceilingabove ceiling1
12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - white with grey streaks
200 sq. m 348-BS-03A No 5% chrysotile No Yes A good ACM104 floorfloor1
cement pipe 10 m ns No ns No Yes C good PACM104 below ceilingbelow ceiling1
12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - white with grey streaks
90 sq. m Ref 348-BS-03A No 5% chrysotile No Yes A good ACM104A, 104B, 104C, 104D, 107, 112
floorfloor1
Yes - Suspect material is visible without opening hatches or lifting ceiling tiles No - Suspect material can only be viewed if access hatches are opened or ceiling tiles lifted.
A - Areas of the building within reach (from floor level) of all building usersB - Frequently entered maintenance areas within reach of maintenance staff, without the need for a ladderC - Areas of the building above 2.4 m where use of a ladder is required to reach the asbestosD - Areas of the building behind inaccessible solid ceiling systems, walls, or mechanical equipment, etc., where demolition of the ceiling, wall, or equipment, etc., is required to reach the asbestos
Accessibility Classification
Visibility
Notes: ACM - asbestos-containing material PACM - presumed asbestos-containing material Access. - accessibility nq - not quantified na - not applicable ns - not sampled REF - reference sample x - estimated number of units F - friable NF - non friable PFM - potentialy friable material S - Sample (original sample collected) V - Visually identical sample
1
* Based on a non-intrusive inspection of visible surfaces within the room space.
14-Mar-08
RoomSpecificLocation
ACM Type EstimatedQuantity
SampleNumber
OriginalSample?
Asbestos Content
Friable?Visible?
Access. Comments/Notes
ACMConditionLevel
ACMLocation
insulating cement on pipe fitting 4 ns No 17% chrysotile Yes Yes C good ACM AS IDENTIFIED
IN SAP INVENTORY
104C below ceilingbelow ceiling1
2' x 4' acoustical ceiling tile - medium fissure pinhole pattern
100 sq. m Ref 348-BS-02A No 2% amosite, 2% anthophylite, 2%
chrysotile
Yes Yes C good ACM105, 106, 107, 108,109, 110, 110A, 110B, 110C, 114
ceilingceiling1
stucco texturized material 45 sq. m 348-BS-04D Yes 8% chrysotile Yes Yes C good ACM106A ceilingceiling1
stucco texturized material 55 sq. m Ref 348-BS-04D No 8% chrysotile Yes Yes C good ACM107A ceilingceiling1
cement soffit 5 sq. m ns No ns No Yes C good PACM108 soffitexterior1
12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with brown streaks
35 sq. m 348-BS-05A Yes 2% chrysotile No Yes A good ACM110 floorfloor1
12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with brown streaks
75 sq. m Ref 348-BS-05A No 2% chrysotile No Yes A good ACM110A, 110B, 111, 118, 127, 128A, 131A
floorfloor1
2' x 4' acoustical ceiling tile - medium fissure pinhole pattern
350 sq. m Ref 348-BS-02A No 2% amosite, 2% anthophylite, 2%
chrysotile
Yes Yes C good ACM111, 111A, 116, 117, 118, 127, 128, 128A
ceilingceiling1
fire door 3 sq. m ns No ns No Yes A good ACM AS IDENTIFIED
IN SAP INVENTORY
113 doorbelow ceiling1
Yes - Suspect material is visible without opening hatches or lifting ceiling tiles No - Suspect material can only be viewed if access hatches are opened or ceiling tiles lifted.
A - Areas of the building within reach (from floor level) of all building usersB - Frequently entered maintenance areas within reach of maintenance staff, without the need for a ladderC - Areas of the building above 2.4 m where use of a ladder is required to reach the asbestosD - Areas of the building behind inaccessible solid ceiling systems, walls, or mechanical equipment, etc., where demolition of the ceiling, wall, or equipment, etc., is required to reach the asbestos
Accessibility Classification
Visibility
Notes: ACM - asbestos-containing material PACM - presumed asbestos-containing material Access. - accessibility nq - not quantified na - not applicable ns - not sampled REF - reference sample x - estimated number of units F - friable NF - non friable PFM - potentialy friable material S - Sample (original sample collected) V - Visually identical sample
2
* Based on a non-intrusive inspection of visible surfaces within the room space.
14-Mar-08
RoomSpecificLocation
ACM Type EstimatedQuantity
SampleNumber
OriginalSample?
Asbestos Content
Friable?Visible?
Access. Comments/Notes
ACMConditionLevel
ACMLocation
insulating cement on pipe fitting 30-40 ns No 17% chrysotile Yes Yes A good ACM AS IDENTIFIED
IN SAP INVENTORY
113 below ceilingbelow ceiling1
breeching insulation 15 sq. m ns No 31% chrysotile Yes Yes A good ACM AS IDENTIFIED
IN SAP INVENTORY
113 below ceilingbelow ceiling1
2' x 4' acoustical ceiling tile - medium fissure pinhole pattern
250 sq. m Ref 348-BS-02A No 2% amosite, 2% anthophylite, 2%
chrysotile
Yes Yes C good ACM129, 130, 131, 131A, 131B, 131C, stair A
ceilingceiling1
2' x 4' acoustical ceiling tile - medium fissure pinhole pattern
450 sq. m Ref 348-BS-02A No 2% amosite, 2% anthophylite, 2%
chrysotile
Yes Yes C good ACM201, 202, 203, 205, 206, 207, 220, 221, 222, 221A
ceilingceiling2
12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with brown streaks
175 sq. m Ref 348-BS-05A No 2% chrysotile No Yes A good ACM202, 203, 207, 220, 223A, 223B, 224, 224A, 224B
floorfloor2
2' x 4' acoustical ceiling tile - medium fissure pinhole pattern
300 sq. m Ref 348-BS-02A No 2% amosite, 2% anthophylite, 2%
chrysotile
Yes Yes C good ACM223, 223A, 223B, 224, 224A, 224B, stair D
ceilingceiling2
Yes - Suspect material is visible without opening hatches or lifting ceiling tiles No - Suspect material can only be viewed if access hatches are opened or ceiling tiles lifted.
A - Areas of the building within reach (from floor level) of all building usersB - Frequently entered maintenance areas within reach of maintenance staff, without the need for a ladderC - Areas of the building above 2.4 m where use of a ladder is required to reach the asbestosD - Areas of the building behind inaccessible solid ceiling systems, walls, or mechanical equipment, etc., where demolition of the ceiling, wall, or equipment, etc., is required to reach the asbestos
Accessibility Classification
Visibility
Notes: ACM - asbestos-containing material PACM - presumed asbestos-containing material Access. - accessibility nq - not quantified na - not applicable ns - not sampled REF - reference sample x - estimated number of units F - friable NF - non friable PFM - potentialy friable material S - Sample (original sample collected) V - Visually identical sample
3
* Based on a non-intrusive inspection of visible surfaces within the room space.
14-Mar-08
APPENDIX 4 Laboratory Analytical Report – Asbestos:
Polarized Light Microscopy
Sample Location Appearance % Type
AsbestosNon-Asbestos
% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy
040804696
Attn: Martin LingJacques Whitford7271 Warden AvenueMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 5X5
Customer PO: 1025760/985Received: 02/29/08 9:30 AM
1025760/985
Customer ID: JACQ30J
Fax: (905) 479-9326 Phone: (905) 474-7700Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:3/5/2008Analysis Date:
Report Date: 3/5/2008
EMSL Analytical, Inc.107 Haddon Ave., Westmont, NJ 08108Phone: (856) 858-4800 Fax: (856) 858-4960 Email: [email protected]
348-BS-04D040804696-0001
ROOM 106A WhiteFibrousHeterogeneous
Chrysotile8%Cellulose10% Non-fibrous (other)82%
348-BS-04E040804696-0002
ROOM 106A Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)
348-BS-16A040804696-0003
ROOM 126 Tan None Detected
FibrousHeterogeneous
Cellulose60%Glass10%Min. Wool20%
Non-fibrous (other)10%
348-BS-16B040804696-0004
ROOM 126 Tan None Detected
FibrousHeterogeneous
Cellulose60%Glass10%Min. Wool20%
Non-fibrous (other)10%
348-BS-16C040804696-0005
ROOM 126 Tan None Detected
FibrousHeterogeneous
Cellulose60%Glass10%Min. Wool20%
Non-fibrous (other)10%
1
Stephen Siegel, CIH, Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory
PLM-1
Analyst(s)
THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT.
Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government.Analysis performed by EMSL Westmont (NVLAP #101048-0), NY ELAP 10872
Kristy Reeves (5)
Sample Location Appearance % TypeAsbestosNon-Asbestos
% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Material via EPA 600/R-93/116. Quantitation using 400 Point Count Procedure.
040802844
Attn: Martin LingJacques Whitford7271 Warden AvenueMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 5X5
Customer PO: 1025760 985Received: 02/07/08 9:30 AM
1025760 PHASE 985
Customer ID: JACQ30J
Fax: (905) 479-9326 Phone: (905) 474-7700Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:2/19/2008Analysis Date:
Report Date: 2/20/2008
EMSL Analytical, Inc.107 Haddon Ave., Westmont, NJ 08108Phone: (856) 858-4800 Fax: (856) 858-4960 Email: [email protected]
348-BS-01A040802844-0001
ROOM 103 Blue/White/BlackNon-FibrousHeterogeneous
Chrysotile<0.25%Non-fibrous (other)100.00%
348-BS-01B040802844-0002
ROOM 103 Blue/White/BlackNon-FibrousHeterogeneous
Chrysotile<0.25%Non-fibrous (other)100.00%
348-BS-01C040802844-0003
ROOM 103 Blue/White/BlackNon-FibrousHeterogeneous
Chrysotile<0.25%Non-fibrous (other)100.00%
348-BS-04A040802844-0010
ROOM 106A White/GrayNon-FibrousHeterogeneous
Chrysotile0.25%Non-fibrous (other)99.75%
348-BS-04B040802844-0011
ROOM 106A WhiteNon-FibrousHeterogeneous
Chrysotile<0.25%Non-fibrous (other)100.00%
348-BS-04C040802844-0012
ROOM 106A WhiteNon-FibrousHeterogeneous
Chrysotile<0.25%Non-fibrous (other)100.00%
Stephen Siegel, CIH, Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory
PLMPointCount-1 1
Analyst(s)
THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT.
Disclaimer:Some samples may contain asbestos fibers present in dimensions below PLM resolution limits. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 0.25%. EMSL Analytyical Inc suggests that samples reported as <0.25% or none detected undergo additional analysis via TEM. The above test report relates only to the items tested. This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval of EMSL Analytical Inc. This test report must not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the United States Government. EMSL Analytical Inc., bears no esponsibility for sample collection activities, analytical method limitations, or the accuracy of results when requested to separate layered samples. EMSL Analytical Inc., liability is limited to the cost of sample analysis.The test results contained within this report meet the requirements of NELAC unless otherwise noted. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.Analysis performed by EMSL Test Lab (NVLAP #101048-0), NY ELAP 10872
Jerry Cherian (2)Nancy Stalter (4)
Sample Location Appearance % Type
AsbestosNon-Asbestos
% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy
040802844
Attn: Martin LingJacques Whitford7271 Warden AvenueMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 5X5
Customer PO: 1025760 985Received: 02/07/08 9:30 AM
1025760 PHASE 985
Customer ID: JACQ30J
Fax: (905) 479-9326 Phone: (905) 474-7700Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:2/19/2008Analysis Date:
Report Date: 2/20/2008
EMSL Analytical, Inc.107 Haddon Ave., Westmont, NJ 08108Phone: (856) 858-4800 Fax: (856) 858-4960 Email: [email protected]
348-BS-02A040802844-0004
ROOM 103 CreamFibrousHeterogeneous
Amosite2%Anthophyllite2%Chrysotile2%
Min. Wool45% Non-fibrous (other)49%
348-BS-02B040802844-0005
ROOM 104 Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)
348-BS-02C040802844-0006
ROOM 129 Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)
348-BS-03A040802844-0007
ROOM 104 White/GrayNon-FibrousHeterogeneous
Chrysotile5%Non-fibrous (other)95%
348-BS-03B040802844-0008
ROOM 104A Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)
348-BS-03C040802844-0009
ROOM 104C Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)
348-BS-05A040802844-0013
ROOM 110 Brown/BeigeNon-FibrousHeterogeneous
Chrysotile2%Non-fibrous (other)98%
348-BS-05B040802844-0014
ROOM 111 Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)
1
Stephen Siegel, CIH, Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory
PLM-1
Analyst(s)
Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government.Analysis performed by EMSL Westmont (NVLAP #101048-0), NY ELAP 10872
Jerry Cherian (37)Nancy Stalter (6)
Sample Location Appearance % Type
AsbestosNon-Asbestos
% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy
040802844
Attn: Martin LingJacques Whitford7271 Warden AvenueMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 5X5
Customer PO: 1025760 985Received: 02/07/08 9:30 AM
1025760 PHASE 985
Customer ID: JACQ30J
Fax: (905) 479-9326 Phone: (905) 474-7700Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:2/19/2008Analysis Date:
Report Date: 2/20/2008
EMSL Analytical, Inc.107 Haddon Ave., Westmont, NJ 08108Phone: (856) 858-4800 Fax: (856) 858-4960 Email: [email protected]
348-BS-05C040802844-0015
ROOM 127 Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)
348-BS-06A040802844-0016
ROOM 116 Beige None Detected
Non-FibrousHomogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
348-BS-06B040802844-0017
ROOM 117 Beige None Detected
Non-FibrousHomogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
348-BS-06C040802844-0018
ROOM 205 Beige None Detected
Non-FibrousHomogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
348-BS-07A040802844-0019
CORRIDOR 115 Black/Beige None Detected
Non-FibrousHeterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
348-BS-07B040802844-0020
CORRIDOR 204 Black/Beige None Detected
Non-FibrousHeterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
348-BS-07C040802844-0021
CORRIDOR 115 Black/Beige None Detected
Non-FibrousHeterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
348-BS-08A040802844-0022
ROOM 119 Beige None Detected
Non-FibrousHomogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
2
Stephen Siegel, CIH, Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory
PLM-1
Analyst(s)
Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government.Analysis performed by EMSL Westmont (NVLAP #101048-0), NY ELAP 10872
Jerry Cherian (37)Nancy Stalter (6)
Sample Location Appearance % Type
AsbestosNon-Asbestos
% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy
040802844
Attn: Martin LingJacques Whitford7271 Warden AvenueMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 5X5
Customer PO: 1025760 985Received: 02/07/08 9:30 AM
1025760 PHASE 985
Customer ID: JACQ30J
Fax: (905) 479-9326 Phone: (905) 474-7700Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:2/19/2008Analysis Date:
Report Date: 2/20/2008
EMSL Analytical, Inc.107 Haddon Ave., Westmont, NJ 08108Phone: (856) 858-4800 Fax: (856) 858-4960 Email: [email protected]
348-BS-08B040802844-0023
ROOM 120 Beige None Detected
Non-FibrousHomogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
348-BS-08C040802844-0024
ROOM 121 Beige None Detected
Non-FibrousHomogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
348-BS-09A040802844-0025
ROOM 119 Brown None Detected
FibrousHeterogeneous
Cellulose60%Min. Wool30%
Non-fibrous (other)10%
348-BS-09B040802844-0026
ROOM 115 Brown None Detected
FibrousHeterogeneous
Cellulose60%Min. Wool30%
Non-fibrous (other)10%
348-BS-09C040802844-0027
ROOM 120 Brown None Detected
FibrousHeterogeneous
Cellulose60%Min. Wool30%
Non-fibrous (other)10%
348-BS-10A040802844-0028
ROOM 122B Beige None Detected
Non-FibrousHomogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
348-BS-10B040802844-0029
ROOM 122B Beige None Detected
Non-FibrousHomogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
348-BS-10C040802844-0030
ROOM 122B Beige None Detected
Non-FibrousHomogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
3
Stephen Siegel, CIH, Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory
PLM-1
Analyst(s)
Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government.Analysis performed by EMSL Westmont (NVLAP #101048-0), NY ELAP 10872
Jerry Cherian (37)Nancy Stalter (6)
Sample Location Appearance % Type
AsbestosNon-Asbestos
% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy
040802844
Attn: Martin LingJacques Whitford7271 Warden AvenueMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 5X5
Customer PO: 1025760 985Received: 02/07/08 9:30 AM
1025760 PHASE 985
Customer ID: JACQ30J
Fax: (905) 479-9326 Phone: (905) 474-7700Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:2/19/2008Analysis Date:
Report Date: 2/20/2008
EMSL Analytical, Inc.107 Haddon Ave., Westmont, NJ 08108Phone: (856) 858-4800 Fax: (856) 858-4960 Email: [email protected]
348-BS-11A040802844-0031
ROOM 128 Tan/Green None Detected
Non-FibrousHeterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
348-BS-11B040802844-0032
ROOM 129 Tan/Green None Detected
Non-FibrousHeterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
348-BS-11C040802844-0033
ROOM 128 Tan/Green None Detected
Non-FibrousHeterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
348-BS-12A040802844-0034
CORRIDOR 115 Brown None Detected
FibrousHeterogeneous
Cellulose60%Min. Wool30%
Non-fibrous (other)10%
348-BS-12B040802844-0035
CORRIDOR 115 Brown None Detected
FibrousHeterogeneous
Cellulose60%Min. Wool30%
Non-fibrous (other)10%
348-BS-12C040802844-0036
CORRIDOR 115 Brown None Detected
FibrousHeterogeneous
Cellulose60%Min. Wool30%
Non-fibrous (other)10%
348-BS-13A040802844-0037
ROOM 131 Tan/Pink None Detected
Non-FibrousHeterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
348-BS-13B040802844-0038
ROOM 131B Tan/Pink None Detected
Non-FibrousHeterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
4
Stephen Siegel, CIH, Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory
PLM-1
Analyst(s)
Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government.Analysis performed by EMSL Westmont (NVLAP #101048-0), NY ELAP 10872
Jerry Cherian (37)Nancy Stalter (6)
Sample Location Appearance % Type
AsbestosNon-Asbestos
% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy
040802844
Attn: Martin LingJacques Whitford7271 Warden AvenueMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 5X5
Customer PO: 1025760 985Received: 02/07/08 9:30 AM
1025760 PHASE 985
Customer ID: JACQ30J
Fax: (905) 479-9326 Phone: (905) 474-7700Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:2/19/2008Analysis Date:
Report Date: 2/20/2008
EMSL Analytical, Inc.107 Haddon Ave., Westmont, NJ 08108Phone: (856) 858-4800 Fax: (856) 858-4960 Email: [email protected]
348-BS-13C040802844-0039
CORRIDOR 131 Tan/Pink None Detected
Non-FibrousHeterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
348-BS-14A040802844-0040
ROOM 221 Green None Detected
Non-FibrousHomogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
348-BS-14B040802844-0041
ROOM 222 Green None Detected
Non-FibrousHomogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
348-BS-14C040802844-0042
ROOM 223 Green None Detected
Non-FibrousHomogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
348-BS-15A040802844-0043
ROOM 116 Tan/White None Detected
Non-FibrousHeterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
348-BS-15B040802844-0044
CORRIDOR 115 Tan/White None Detected
Non-FibrousHeterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
348-BS-15C040802844-0045
ROOM 117 Tan/White None Detected
Non-FibrousHeterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
348-BS-15D040802844-0046
ROOM 128 Tan/White None Detected
Non-FibrousHeterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
5
Stephen Siegel, CIH, Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory
PLM-1
Analyst(s)
Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government.Analysis performed by EMSL Westmont (NVLAP #101048-0), NY ELAP 10872
Jerry Cherian (37)Nancy Stalter (6)
Sample Location Appearance % Type
AsbestosNon-Asbestos
% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy
040802844
Attn: Martin LingJacques Whitford7271 Warden AvenueMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 5X5
Customer PO: 1025760 985Received: 02/07/08 9:30 AM
1025760 PHASE 985
Customer ID: JACQ30J
Fax: (905) 479-9326 Phone: (905) 474-7700Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:2/19/2008Analysis Date:
Report Date: 2/20/2008
EMSL Analytical, Inc.107 Haddon Ave., Westmont, NJ 08108Phone: (856) 858-4800 Fax: (856) 858-4960 Email: [email protected]
348-BS-15E040802844-0047
ROOM 205 Tan/White None Detected
Non-FibrousHeterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
348-BS-15F040802844-0048
ROOM 221 Tan/White None Detected
Non-FibrousHeterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
348-BS-15G040802844-0049
ROOM 222 Tan/White None Detected
Non-FibrousHeterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
6
Stephen Siegel, CIH, Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory
PLM-1
Analyst(s)
THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT.
Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government.Analysis performed by EMSL Westmont (NVLAP #101048-0), NY ELAP 10872
Jerry Cherian (37)Nancy Stalter (6)
APPENDIX 5 Evaluation Criteria for Assessing Asbestos
Containing Materials
© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 March 14, 2008 Appendix 5-1
Criteria for Assessing Asbestos Containing Materials
A description of the criteria used in evaluating the condition, accessibility and exposure risk of asbestos-containing materials is provided below. The criteria is generally based on the Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC) document entitled “Deputy Ministers Directive 057 – Asbestos Management” (Last Revised 1999/07/16) and industry standards of practice.
Assessment of Condition
Spray Applied Fireproofing, Insulation and Textured Finishes
In evaluating the condition of ACM spray applied as fireproofing, thermal insulation or texture, decorative or acoustic finishes, the following criteria apply:
Good
Surface of material shows no significant signs of damage, deterioration or delamination. Up to one percent visible damage to surface is allowed within range of GOOD. Evaluation of sprayed fireproofing requires the Assessor to be familiar with the irregular surface texture typical of sprayed asbestos products. GOOD condition includes unencapsulated or unpainted fireproofing or texture finishes, where no delamination or damage is observed, and encapsulated fireproofing or texture finishes where the encapsulation has been applied after the damage or fallout occurred.
Poor
Sprayed materials show signs of damage, delamination or deterioration. More than one percent damage to surface of ACM spray.
In observation areas, where damage exists in isolated locations, both GOOD and POOR condition may be reported. The extent or percentage of each condition will be recorded on the Assessor reassessment form.
FAIR condition is not utilized or considered as a valid criterion in the evaluation of sprayed fireproofing, sprayed insulation, or texture coat finishes.
The evaluation of ACM spray applied as fireproofing, non-mechanical thermal insulation, or texture, decorative or acoustic finishes which are present above ceilings, may be limited by the number of observations made, and by building components such as ducts or full height walls that obstruct the above ceiling observations. Persons entering the ceiling area are advised to be watchful for ACM DEBRIS prior to accessing or working above ceilings in areas of building with ACM, regardless of the reported condition.
Other ACM
In evaluating the condition of mechanical insulation (on boilers, breaching, ductwork, piping, tanks, equipment etc.) the following criteria are used:
© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 March 14, 2008 Appendix 5-2
Good
Insulation is completely covered in jacketing and exhibits no evidence of damage or deterioration. No insulation is exposed. Includes conditions where the jacketing has minor surface damage (i.e., scuffs or stains), but the jacketing is not penetrated.
Fair
Minor penetration damage to jacketed insulation (cuts, tears, nicks, deterioration or delamination) or undamaged insulation that has never been jacketed. Insulation is exposed but not showing surface disintegration. The extent of missing insulation ranges should be minor to none.
Poor
Original insulation jacket is missing, damaged, deteriorated or delaminated. Insulation is exposed and significant areas have been dislodged. Damage cannot be readily repaired. The evaluation of mechanical insulation may be limited by the number of observations made and building components such as ducts or full height walls that obstruct observations. In these circumstances, it is not possible to observe each foot of mechanical insulation from all angles.
Non-Friable and Potentially Friable Materials
Non-friable materials generally have little potential to release airborne fibres, even when damaged by mechanical breakage. However, some non-friable materials, i.e., exterior asbestos cement products, may have deteriorated so that the binder no longer effectively contains the asbestos fibres. In such cases of significantly deteriorated non-friable material, the material will be treated as a friable product.
Evaluation of Accessibility
The accessibility of building materials known or suspected of being ACM is rated according to the following criteria:
Access (A)
Areas of the building within reach of all building users. Includes areas such as gymnasiums, workshops, and storage areas where activities of the building users may result in disturbance of ACM not normally within reach from floor level.
Access (B)
Frequently entered maintenance areas within reach of maintenance staff, without the need for a ladder. Includes: frequently entered pipe chases, tunnels and service areas or areas within reach from a fixed ladder or catwalk, i.e., tops of equipment, mezzanines.
Access (C) Exposed
Areas of the building above 8'0" where use of a ladder is required to reach the ACM. Only refers to ACM materials that are exposed to view, from the floor or ladder, without removing or opening other building components such as ceiling tiles, or service access doors or hatches. Does not include infrequently accessed service areas of the building.
© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 March 14, 2008 Appendix 5-3
Access (C) Concealed
Areas of the building which require the removal of a building component, including lay-in ceilings and access panels into solid ceiling systems. Includes rarely entered crawl spaces, attic spaces, etc. Observations are limited to the extent visible from the access points.
Access (D)
Areas of the building behind inaccessible solid ceiling systems, walls, or mechanical equipment, etc. where demolition of the ceiling, wall or equipment, etc., is required to reach the ACM. Evaluation of the condition and extent of ACM is limited or impossible, depending on the Assessor's ability to visually examine the materials In Access D.
APPENDIX 6 Terms and Definitions
© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 March 14, 2008 Appendix 6-1
Terms and Definitions
Asbestos
Any of the following asbestiform silicate minerals: actinolite asbestos, anthophyllite asbestos, chrysotile, crocidolite, cumming tonite-grunerite asbestos (amosite), tremolite asbestos with a dry weight concentration greater than 0.5%.
Friable
Capable of being crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by hand pressure.
HEPA Filter
A high efficiency particulate aerosol filter that is at least 99.97 per cent efficient in collecting a 0.3 micrometre aerosol.
Homogeneous Material
A material that is uniform in colour and texture
Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM)
Polarized Light Microscopy is a technique accepted by the US Environmental Protection Agency as a screening method for detecting asbestos fibres in bulk material samples.
Presumed Asbestos Containing Materials (PACMs)
Materials that are known to have been manufactured contain asbestos. Testing of the material is required to determine if the material contains asbestos fibres.
Recommended Corrective Actions (RCAs)
Areas identified to consist of asbestos-containing or presumed asbestos-containing materials that require attention to repair or remove damaged materials.
Building
Any structure, vault, chamber or tunnel including, without limitation, the electrical, plumbing, heating and air handling equipment (including rigid duct work) of the structure, vault, chamber or tunnel.
APPENDIX 7 Summary of Results of Analysis of Bulk Samples
- SAP inventory