final demonstrative evidence & visual trial theory · 11/18/2013 1 investigation &...
TRANSCRIPT
11/18/2013
1
Investigation & Prosecution of
Vehicular Homicides
Warren Diepraam
Montgomery County District Attorney’s Office
Demonstrative Evidence & Visual Trial Theory
Got Cars?
Vehicular Crimes Cases • High Profile
• Highly Emotional
• Highly Likeable Defendants
• High Degree of Expertise
• Highly Complicated
Question?
The Crime Scene
• Location?
• Move Along?
• Cleared Scene?
• Police Attitudes?
• Evidence?
What Evidence?• Photos
• Maps
• Diagrams
• Charts
• Reconstruction
• SFSTs
• Blood Evidence
• Videos
• Cell Phones
• Social Media
• Doctor’s Records
• 911 Calls
• Medical Records
• Autopsy
• Insurance Records
• Receipts
• GPS Data
• Dispatch Recordings
• OnStar / AAA Roadside
• Civil Documents
• Internet Posting
• Statements
No, Really! What Evidence?
• Photos
• Measurements
• Cars
• Phones
• Blood
• Social Media
11/18/2013
2
Got the Evidence – Now What?
• Demonstrative Evidence vs. Exhibits
• Predicates
• Rules of Evidence
• Publishing & Presenting
–Trial Fusion (www.trialfusion.net)–PowerPoint
• Consider . . .
Learning Types• Kinetic Learners = 5%
• Auditory Learners = 30%
• Visual Learners = 65%
Visual65%
Auditory30%
Kinetic5%
Visual Learners Introduction ‐ Visual Facts
You MUST Make It Visual! Sounds Fun, But . . .• We Don’t Have the Equipment.
– Forfeiture Funds?
–Grants?
–MADD or Other Organizations
–Beg, Borrow, or Buy Your Own
–Go “old school” and blow it up!
= WINNING!
11/18/2013
3
When You Can – Bring It In! Photos – Key Points
• Quantity?
• Quality?
• Get there Fast!
• All the Evidence.
• Think Outside the Box.
• Consider the Defenses.
Good Photo of Damage Better Photo of Damage
Good Photo of Scene Good Photo of Scene
11/18/2013
5
Still Cold… Here’s Why
DNA On the driver’s seat . . .
. . . and the wheel. It’s my Car’s Fault…
11/18/2013
6
Looks fine to me? Just Another Excuse
Are You? Quantity vs. Quality
Quantity vs. Quality Quantity vs. Quality
11/18/2013
7
Quantity vs. Quality Quantity vs. Quality
Move To Better LightingVICTIM
DEFENDANT
Drinking Locations Drinking Locations
11/18/2013
8
Don’t Forget These….
Follow Up
Booking PhotosGOOD. BETTER. BEST.
Maps – Key Points• Consider the Source.
• Careful with Formatting.
• Do not take the place of photos.
• Add to them for enhanced effects.
Where to find them?• The internet
• Map Making Companies
• Law Enforcement & Gov’t Agencies
–Tax Assessor’s Office
–Appraisal & Flood Control Districts
Maps
www.maps.google.com
11/18/2013
9
Maps
www.terraserver.com
Maps
Last Resort?
Pole Impact
Debris Field
Nguyen’s House
Smith’s House
Mitchell’s House
State’s Exhibit 26 A
State’s Exhibit 27
Path of Travel / Speed Calculations
Toll Plaza #1 @ 2:45:30 a.m.
Toll Exit to Bellaire @ 2:52:30 a.m. & Crash
Drive Time at Speed Limit = 10 Min
Defendant’s Drive Time = 90 MPH
11/18/2013
10
Maps – Tyler Crash Location
Bar
Diagrams and Charts
• Don’t Make More Complicated than Data.
• Keep very simple.
• Easy to Read.
• Use to Summarize.
Wrong Way Sign
Do Not Enter Sign
State’sExhibit96
Claren DamasoBricyn Afong
Stopped for red light
Arakawa ran red light
HOT = BEND
HOT = BEND
SCHOOL ST
Old 105 H
WY
11/18/2013
11
Crash Data Retrieval
Throttle position in %, shown wide open‐70%‐
closed (idle)
Vehicle speed shown at
57‐65‐62‐55‐47 MPH
MPHEngine speed shown 4032‐4160‐2304‐1088‐
896 RPM
Brake switch status shown from off to on
State’sExhibit
2
DPS Speed 1: 117DPS Speed 2: 93
Total Station (Bring it in)
249 North
249 South
WalgreensChevron
HardinStore Road
Presenting DNA
11/18/2013
12
D8S1179
D21S11
D7S820
CSF1PO
D3S1358
TH01
D13S317
D16S539
D2S1338
D19S433
vWA
D5S818
FGA
Amelogenin
D18S51
TPOX
D8S1179
D3S1358
TH01
D19S433
vWA
TPOX
Amelogenin
D5S818
1 IN 2,298,000 Caucasians
Clay Abbot
State’s Exhibit 5
Swab from wheel
D8S1179
D21S11
D7S820
CSF1PO
D3S1358
TH01
D13S317
D16S539
D2S1338
D19S433
vWA
D5S818
FGA
Amelogenin
D18S51
TPOX
D8S1179
D3S1358
TH01
D19S433
vWA
TPOX
Amelogenin
D5S818
1 IN 3,123 Caucasians
D21S11
D13S317
D16S539
FGA
Clay Abbot
State’s Exhibit 5
Swab from driver’s seat
Reconstruction Evidence – Key Points
• Can Get Complicated.
• Keep It Simple.
• Show the basics.
• Give some background.
• Make It VISUAL!
Skid MarksSkid Marks: an elongated stain in the rear of one's underwear caused by poopy pants
Types of SkidsSkid Marks – marks made by tires that are not rotating.
Skip Skid – short choppy, usually made by a bouncing tire.
Gap Skid – segmented with gaps between segments.
Curved Skids – continuous but slightly curved.
Overlapping Skids – rear tire marks over front marks.
Skuff Marks – tires that are still rotating (sideslip, impact, acceleration scuffs).
Yaw Marks – rolling tire is sliding sideways.
Squeegee Marks – tire as it wipes moisture from road.
Erasing – removal of dirt or debris by wiper action of skidding tires.
Shadow – faint tire mark preceding the darker skid mark.
Tire Print – imprint in soft dirt or sand made by a rolling tire.
Furrows – mounding of soft material (dirt, snow, grass) made by skidding tire.
Jog, Offset – irregular mark caused by sudden change in direction (usually impact).
Scallop – irregular mark caused by flat tire.
Characteristics of Skid Marks
Skid Marks
Wheel Motion Slide, No Roll
Operation Braking
Number From 4‐Tired Vehicle Mostly 4, Also 1, 2, 3
Right & Left Tires Equally Strong
Front & Rear Tires Front Stronger
Width If Straight, Same As Tire
Beginning Usually Abrupt
End Usually Abrupt
Striations Always Parallel to Mark
Other Details Outer Edges of Ten Stronger
Length 1 to 500 Feet
11/18/2013
13
Anticipate Defenses and Rebut Them Before the Defense
Defendant’s Tire Marks Flat Tire Marks
Shadow Skid
Impending Skid
Length: 188 feet
Use Diagrams to Explain
Put It All Together
Length: 188 feet
Both Tires Locked=.80
SQUARE ROOT OF:
32 x 188 x 0.80
Gravity=32
= 69MPH
Diagrams for Difficult Concepts
2000 lbs
4000 lbs
50.0lbs 4000
lbs 2000
Weight
Force HorizontalFactor Drag
w
Ff
Direction of Force
State’s Exhibit182
11/18/2013
14
TibiaDirection of Force
State’s Exhibit181
ROADWAY SURFACE
DIRECTION OF FORCE
State’s Exhibit187
ROADWAY SURFACE
DIRECTION OF FORCE
FRICTIONAL FORCES
State’s Exhibit188
Collinear Collisions
Opposite Direction
Same Direction
11/18/2013
15
MINIMUMPRE‐IMPACT SPEED OF COBALT = 93 MPH
Weight = 3105
( x?
)
+ (Weight= 4952
xPre‐ImpactSpeed = 13
x.276
)
=( (
)
)xxMinimumPost‐Impact Speed= 41 .927
+Weight= 4952
x x
.988
MinimumPost‐Impact Speed= 39
Weight = 3105
SOLVE FORApproachAngle
DepartAngle
DepartAngle
State’sExhibit75
Vericom
State’sExhibit
5
State’sExhibit
5
11/18/2013
16
SFSTs – Key Points
• Help to Understand.
• They Need to See It.
• In Court Demos.
• What’s the Purpose?
Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus
Hawk‐Eye Video HGN Demonstratives
HGNLeft Eye Right Eye
(1)________ ________ Lack of smooth pursuit
(2)________ ________ Distinct & Sustained at Maximum Deviation
(3)________ ________ Onset Prior to 45 Degrees
Number of Clues Indicating Intoxication: ______
TOTAL CLUES: ______
4
6
How does HGN apply to driving?
11/18/2013
17
HGN= Here Goes Nothing Walk & Turn(1)_____ Can’t balance during instructional phase(2)_____ Starts too soon(3)_____ Stops while walking(4)_____ Steps off line(5)_____ Doesn’t touch heel to toe(6)_____ Uses arms to balance(7)_____ Wrong number of steps(8)_____ Improper turn (or loses balance on turn)
Number of Clues Indicating Intoxication: ________TOTAL CLUES: ________
2
5
11/18/2013
18
One Leg Stand(1)_____ Sways
(2)_____ Hops
(3)_____ Puts Foot Down
(4)_____ Raises Arms for Balance
Number of Clues Indicating Intoxication: ________
TOTAL CLUES: ________
2
3
11/18/2013
19
Put it all together.
Beyond AReasonable Doubt
Probable Cause
Reasonable Suspicion
Signs of Intoxication
- Blood .15
- Lying ‐ “No” Open Containers & “ 2 Beers”
- Lost Control of Vehicle
- Inappropriate Actions
- Refuses Portable Breath Test
- Refuses One Leg Stand
- Refuses Walk & Turn
- HGN 6/6 Clues
- Swaying
- Admits to Drinking “A LOT”
- Attempts to Hide Poor Balance
- Cannot Follow Instructions
- Slowed Ability to Comprehend & Answer Questions
- Slowed Movements & Reactions
- Bloodshot, Glassy Eyes
- Strong Odor of Alcohol Beverage on Breath
- Slow, Hesitated, Deliberate Steps
- Speeding & Not Using Blinker
11/18/2013
20
Blood & Breath Evidence –Key Points
• Scrutinized by Defense Attorneys.
• Boring to Listen to.
• Difficult to understand.
• Solution =
• Make it Visual!
Breath Results
-- 0.122 -- 0.119
Blood Evidence –Start to Finish.
• Blood Draw Video & Photos.
• Lab Photos.
• Chain of Custody Chart.
• Records.
The Blood Kit.• Two blood tubes
• Needle and holder
• Consent forms
• Blood‐collection report
• Four blood‐type labels
• Providone‐Iodine prep pad
• Four coded security seals
• Absorbent materials
• 4‐mil plastic Zipr‐Top Bag
• Mailing carton
• Instructions
Submission Form ‐ The Beginning
11/18/2013
21
Lab Intake. • Open & Review Contents.
• Assign Lab Number.
• Mark Contents.
• Enter into System.
• Assign Technician.
• Take to Evidence Storage.
Evidence Storage The Toxicology Lab
Instrument #1: Screening Instrument
Instrument #2: Gas Chromatography Flame Ionization Detector
11/18/2013
22
Instrument #3: Gas Chromatography‐Mass Spectroscopy
Lab Reports – The End.
Carisoprodol (Soma) 4 mg/L
Diazepam (Valium) 200 mg/L
Hydrocodone (Vicodin)
Chain of Custody.
The Lab Science
The GCMS Testing Process
Blood Draw Lab Admits Aliquot Prep
ELISA / EMITAliquot PrepAuto‐sampler
Oven Travel Time Detection
11/18/2013
23
The GCMS Testing Process
Blood Draw
The GCMS Testing Process
Blood Draw Lab Admits
The GCMS Testing Process
Blood Draw Lab Admits Aliquot Prep
The GCMS Testing Process
Blood Draw Lab Admits Aliquot Prep
ELISA or EMIT
The GCMS Testing Process
ELISA or EMIT
Aliquot PrepAuto-sampler
The GCMS Testing Process
Analytical Column / Oven
Mix SeparationTravel Time
Retention TimeDetected
11/18/2013
24
The GCMS Testing Process
Analytical Column / Oven
Mix SeparationTravel Time
Retention TimeDetected
The GCMS Testing Process
Components Elute
BombardmentFragmentation
Sorted andCounted
The GCFID Testing Process
Blood Draw Lab Admits Aliquot Prep
Auto‐samplerOvenTravel Time
Flame IonDetection
The GCFID Testing Process
Blood Draw Lab Admits Aliquot Prep
The GCFID Testing Process
Blood Draw Lab Admits Aliquot Prep
Videos – Key Points.• Great to Capture entire Crash Scene.
• Don’t Make Too Long.
• Be careful with what you hear.
• Be careful with what you see.
• Where to Get Them?
–Make Your Own
–Witnesses / Spectators
–News Coverage
11/18/2013
25
Reenactment DRE Evaluation
Blood Draw Crash Scene
Aircraft? Social Media & Cell Phones
11/18/2013
26
Social Media – Key Points.• YouTube
• Myspace
• Special Interest Websites
• Blogs
• Newspapers & TV
• www.search.org
Photos, Photos, Photos . . .
Statements & Admissions Punishment Evidence
But Wait – A Solution? Cell Phones AAA CALL
11/18/2013
27
Cell Phones7:51 PM U drunk?8:25 PM Yea8:27 PM CRASH
Cell Phone Tracking
Claims to be home: 2:45am
Relay Tower 1 at 2:42 AM
Relay Tower 2 at 2:44 AM
Crash at 2:45 AM
Receipts & Records – Key Points
• Confirm what you already know.
• Establish a timeline & fill in the gaps.
• Prove your elements.
• Open doors to other stuff?
Bar ReceiptsPer the Waiter in Grand Jury:
Defendant drank 1 Martini at 8 PM
Defendant drank 1 Martini at 8:15 PM
Started drinking the wine at 8:30 PM
Got “friendly pours” because he was a regular customer at Truluck’s
His friend had one glass and he finished the bottle
CRASH HAPPENED AT 9:45 PM
Bar Receipts
Defendant left the bar at 7:04 PM.
Witness called 911 & reported crash at 7:20 PM.
Officers arrived to scene at 7:24 PM.
Insurance Records
11/18/2013
28
Insurance Records Insurance Records
Insurance Records Medical Records
Admits to Alcohol Use
Admits to “2” Drinks
Admits to being Driver
Est. Speed 65 MPH
Weather – Clear
Call Rec’d 2:44 AM
2 Days Prior to Crash
Soma
Valium
Hydrocodone
Norco
11/18/2013
29
Medical Records Autopsy Report
TABC Investigation
Presenting the Victim?
• Prior to Crash.
• After the Crash.
• Don’t Commit Error.
• Day in the Life.
• Try to Get Them There.
Carlo Lujan
A. Tire Marks: When a tire leaves a mark on the roadway it is not always a skid mark. It should be
described and identified as a particular type of mark based on its characteristics.
B. Skid Marks: This is a tire friction mark that is made by a tire that is sliding without rotation on the
road or other surface. We usually associate a skid mark with the results of a driver applying enough
brake pedal pressure to lock the wheels so that they are sliding and no longer rotating. A mark or
even the distance traveled by a vehicle, which leaves no mark, can be considered and measured as a
skid mark also. If a vehicle is traveling sideways as a result of being broadsided, the wheels are not
rotating forward or backward and as a result the tires are sliding just as if the brakes were locked.
Another example would be vehicles tires that are locked due to damage from the collision. If the
metal is forced back into the tires so that they do not rotate the vehicle is considered skidding. A
good investigator will check this restriction by having the vehicle raised and attempting to rotate the
tire.
A skid mark will leave certain characteristics on the roadway. They are relatively straight. A slight
swerve could be the result of the lower edge of the road or a driver able to steer with ABS. They
may be any length up to about 300’. There may be anywhere from 1‐4 marks from a four‐tired
vehicle. Marks made by left and right tires are generally equally dark and equally wide. Front tire
marks are usually more prominent than the rear tire skid marks due to weight shift. The width of a
mark is the width of the tire tread, sometimes it is a little wider. Skid marks end abruptly and they
often show striations that are parallel to the mark. The outer edges of skid marks from the front
tires are sometimes more prominent whereas the middle portion of a skid mark from the rear tires
is more prominent. Striations parallel to the mark are the best indication that the tire is not rotating
and the mark is a skid mark.
C. Skip Skid Mark: This mark is typically made by a vehicle bouncing during braking, usually a
tractor‐trailer. They are usually seen with unloaded semi‐trailers. During braking, the drag on
the sliding tires cause the axle to twist, thus compressing the springs and boosting the semi‐
trailer body. This lift increases the load on the tire and road producing a darker mark. The
momentum then carries the spring and wheel upward, relieving the weight on the tire and
reducing the friction which causes a light mark if any. This process is repeated leaving a series of
intermittent marks. They are to be considered and measured as one skid mark including the
gaps in between them.
D. Collision Scrubs: These are marks caused by the damage to the vehicle as opposed to braking
which locks a wheel. They are usually less than 10’ long unless the tire remains locked. These marks
are very distinct due to the force exerted by the tire on the pavement being greatly increased during
this short time.
E. Crooks: An abrupt change of direction cause by an external force which deflects the vehicle from
its forward motion. A crook is a very good evidence of the area of impact. By placing the vehicle
back over the skid mark at the crook will give you a very good indication of the vehicles point of
impact after accounting for the front overhang.
F. Impending Skids: This is also referred to as “shadow”. When brakes are applied and the wheel is
rotating less and less rapidly. Even after the wheel stops we do not always immediately see a skid
mark. The friction on the tire may not generate enough heat to immediately leave a mark. The
mark will start very light and darken. The skid mark should be measured from the first point it is
visible. Actually the greater friction is just prior to the wheel locking up. So one should not discount
this impending skid. In support of this is the ABS system. A vehicle equipped with ABS will generate
120% braking efficiency compared to a non‐ABS vehicle. ABS brakes continuously pulsate and are at
peak friction just prior to lock‐up.
G. Yaw Marks: These are marks that are made by a tire which is rotating and slipping on the
roadway. A yaw is made by a rotating tire that is slipping more or less parallel to its axis. In a
normal turn made at a moderate speed, the rear wheels track inside of the front ones. But when a
turn is made so fast that traction is lost, the rear wheels track outside of the front ones. This is due
to the centrifugal force tending to keep the vehicle going straight ahead becoming greater than the
friction between the tires and the road surface. The tires sideslip and the mark made is a yaw mark.
Characteristics of a yaw mark are that they are always curved because they result from steering.
Any striations that do appear are nearly crosswise to the mark at the beginning and changing to
oblique marks as the yaw progresses. We can determine a vehicle’s speed based on the radius of
the yaw mark and the drag factor of the roadway. Only pre‐impact yaw marks can be used in this
formula. If a vehicle goes into a yaw after impacting a vehicle or object, that yaw mark cannot be
used to determine speed. A yaw mark can start out as narrow as 1” at the beginning and then
widens as it progresses.
H. Acceleration Scuffs: A scuff mark made when sufficient power is supplied to the drive wheels to
make at least one of them spin on the road surface. These marks have the appearance of a skid
mark. The main difference is that an acceleration scuff will start very dark because the tire is
spinning and generating a lot of heat and will end with the mark gradually fading out. This would be
significant in an investigation if we needed to explain these marks in a photograph which we
determined were not part of the crash being investigated.
I. Flat Tire Marks: A mark made by a tire that is seriously under inflated or overloaded. With a
completely flat tire, the tire bunches up and the sidewalls of the tire also touch the road. The mark
made is scalloped. This is a very significant mark to be able to identify. It is a common claim of
defendants and even witnesses that a tire “blew out” and caused the drive to lose control when that
is very rarely the case. If there is no evidence of a flat tire mark prior to the impact with another
vehicle or object, then it would disprove a claim of a flat tire. But if a flat tire mark clearly leads to
the impact and that vehicle had a flat tire, you have good evidence that the tire was disabled.
J. Imprints: A mark on a road or other surface made without sliding by a rolling tire. If the imprint is
made in dirt, clear tire prints will be left which are made by a rolling wheel. A rolling tire will leave
ruts as opposed to furrows made by a sliding tire. On grass if the surface is uprooted or torn off in
the bottom of the furrow and the surface of the ground disturbed, the wheel was sliding. With
strong well‐rooted grass both sliding and rolling tires bend the grass forward and push it down. A
visible path remains, but whether it was made by a rolling or sliding tire may be uncertain.
K. Scratches and Scrapes: These marks are made with little pressure. They show where sheet
metal parts dragged across the surface or stronger metal parts moved lightly over the area. If the
marks are narrow they are considered to be scratches. If they are broad, they represent scraping.
Scratches are helpful in showing where a vehicle overturned and the path that it took after the
collision. Scrape marks will often help in locating the point of maximum engagement.
L. Gouges: Places where pavement material has been dug out by strong metal parts such as frames,
transmission housings and control arms that have been forced down on the road. With this mark
you should actually be able to reach down and feel the depression in the road. Gouge marks are
very good indicators of the area of impact.
M. Vehicles off the ground:
a. Fall: A downward and onward movement in the air under the force of gravity after forward
momentum carries an object beyond its supporting surface. A vehicle in a fall will almost always
land right side up, as rotation is minimal.
b. Flip: A sudden upward and onward movement off the ground when an object horizontal
movement is obstructed below its center of mass. The vehicle is rotating about its X axis and will flip
over on its side. Rotation during a flip is rapid and the vehicle usually lands upside down. A flip will
usually follow side‐slipping where a vehicle hits a curb or furrows in the dirt building up enough dirt
against the tires to act as a tripping mechanism. There will be an absence of marks between takeoff
and landing.
c. Vaults: End over end flips. They occur when the front tires of a vehicle are stopped by an
obstacle high enough so that the wheels do not roll over it. The vehicle will land upside down and
usually stays right where it lands.
N. Drag Factor: A number representing the acceleration or deceleration of a vehicle or other body
as a decimal fraction of the acceleration of gravity. The horizontal force needed to produce
acceleration in the same direction divided by the weight of the body to which the force is applied.
Then a vehicle slides with all wheels locked, on a level surface, the coefficient of friction and drag
factor have the same value. The drag factor for the vehicle in question on that surface is needed in
almost every calculation used to determine speed. It is the resistance to sliding between the tire
and roadway surface and tells us the rate that the vehicle will decelerate. The main things that
influence the drag factor are the slipperiness of the roadway and the hardness of the rubber of the
tires. Things such as the vehicles weight, temperature, tire tread or tire width are insignificant in
determining the drag factor.
II
METHODS OF DETERMING VEHICLE SPEEDS
There are several methods which can be used to determine the speed of a vehicle. The investigator
must first determine which method(s) is most appropriate based on the evidence and dynamics of
the crash. Some methods will only provide a minimum speed where others will give an impact
speed. Whenever possible a second method can be used to act as a check to help support the
indicated speed. Also sensitivity studys can be performed to show how little or great the speed
changes by changing the data in small increments. I will list the common methods used in
calculating speed and the date required for that calculation. Demonstrations of the formula used
and example crashes will be discussed in the classroom. It should also be noted that there are
formulas which solve for speed and formulas that solve for velocity. The result is the same but
which formula an agency or investigator uses may vary depending on his experience and training.
Therefore I will provide you with all the formulas which may be used.
A. Minimum Speed or Initial Velocity Formula: This formula will tell us based on the length of the
skid marks and the drag factor of the roadway, what the speed of the vehicle was. If the skid mark
distance precedes an impact, the skid distance will only provide the minimum speed which the
vehicle had to have been traveling to leave that length of skid marks. Obviously the vehicle still had
kinetic energy at the time it struck the other vehicle and would have continued skidding had it not
struck the vehicle. Since the skid marks do not account for the energy lost in damaging the cars, the
result is only a minimum speed. If the skid marks are post impact, they again are only a minimum
speed but can provide us with a vehicle after impact speed which can be used to determine a
vehicles impact speed.
B. Combined Speed Formula: We can combine minimum speeds obtained as the vehicle slides over
different surfaces (different drag factors). For example, if a vehicle skidded on cement, then onto
asphalt, and then onto a grass surface, we could start at the end of the crash and work the formula
three times using the appropriate skid distances and drag factors and end up with a speed at the
beginning of the skid marks. This will also be a minimum speed unless the vehicle skidded to a stop
without striking another vehicle or object.
C. Sideslip or Critical Speed Velocity (Yaws): As stated earlier, a yaw mark is the result of steering
input when a driver attempts to turn the vehicle too sharply for the vehicle’s speed. It is often seen
when a driver over‐corrects after the tires leave the road or when attempting to avoid another
vehicle or object in the road. After it is verified that this is a yaw mark, its radius is measured and
then used in this formula with the drag factor to determine the vehicle’s speed at the beginning of
the yaw mark. To determine the radius of a yaw mark an investigator would measure a chord and
middle ordinate off of the mark. These values are used in a radius formula to determine the radius
of the mark. That radius is then used to determine the vehicle speed.
D. Co‐linear Momentum: This formula will provide a vehicle’s velocity at impact. It can be used in a
crash where the vehicles come together and go off in the same direction. The most typical crash this
is used in would be a rear‐end collision. In order to use this equation the investigator must first be
able to determine five pieces of data. You must first know the impact speed of one of the two
vehicles involved. So if a vehicle was stopped at a red light and rear ended you would know his
speed at impact was 0 and could use this equation. You must also have the weights of the two
vehicles. The last two pieces of information needed are the post collision velocities of the vehicles.
This is the velocity that each vehicle was traveling immediately after the impact and is based on post
impact travel distance and the drag factor for that vehicle over that distance. This formula is limited
in that it must be an in‐line crash and you must know the speed at impact of one of the two vehicles.
It can be used in a rear‐end or head‐on crash as long as the above data can be determined.
E. Conservation of Momentum (360 degree angular): Crashes that involve an angular collision can
be reconstructed using this method. The law of conservation of momentum states that the sum of
the total momentum just prior to the crash is equal to the sum of the total momentum after the
crash. Therefore if we are able to determine the total momentum after the crash from our
investigation, then we can determine pre‐crash momentum that will give us the vehicle impact
speeds. We must have four pieces of data for each vehicle to be able to use these equations. Just
like in‐line momentum we need the vehicle weights and post collision velocities. We obtain the
weights by obtaining the curb weight from the Expert Auto Stats program and adding the weight for
occupants, fluids, and cargo. In some cases we have the vehicles weighed with certified scales. This
is most important with vehicles which have been modified as far as bumpers, tool boxes, etc. We
also need the angle which the vehicles approached each other. The last piece of information needed
is the angle which each vehicle departed the collision. The best evidence for determining an
approach angle is a pre‐impact skid mark. With no pre‐impact tire marks a damage analysis will
assist in placing the vehicles in relation to their first contact positions. The departure angles are
determined from post impact skid marks, collision scrubs, scrapes, scratches, fluid trail, etc.
Oftentimes the vehicles will experience rotation when departing a collision. The most important
data to use in determining the departure angle is the vehicles first 10‐20’ of travel in this case. A
common error which results in an incorrect speed would be to obtain a departure angle by drawing a
straight line from the vehicles impact position to its point of rest when the vehicle rotated and did
not travel in a straight path.
F. Conservation of Energy/Momentum: We use this formula whenever reconstructing a crash which
is considered a head‐on. Typically those where the vehicles approach each other at less than 10
degrees. In these cases the approach angle is very sensitive and a couple of degrees could mean a
difference of 10‐20 mph. Also the vehicles usually do not travel very far afterwards which results in a
low after impact speed. Not good cases for momentum alone. This combines energy and
momentum to determine the vehicle speeds at impact. We obviously need the same 8 pieces of
information we obtained to work a conservation of momentum problem. In addition to that we have
to obtain the vehicle Barrier Equivalent Velocity through crush as stated above. We then obtain the
energy dissipated for each vehicle and the force on each vehicle. The forces acting on each vehicle
must be equal. Therefore if they are not, we must balance the forces before continuing. This is done
with a calculation which provides adjusted A and B stiffness values for the vehicle you need to
balance. Once the forces are balanced we use the vehicle weights, after impact velocities, and the
barrier equivalent velocities in the conservation of energy formula. The momentum formula is also
used in combination with the Energy formula to solve the two vehicle impact speeds.
Forensic Toxicology Definitions for Court*
By Warren Diepraam
Montgomery County District Attorney’s Office
• Additive: two substances combine to affect the same areas of the central
nervous system • Aliquot: sample • Antagonistic: interference in the physiological action of a chemical
substance by another chemical substance • ARIDE: Advanced Roadside Impaired Driving Enforcement is a 16 hour
course that trains officers in roadside detection of drug impaired drivers • CNS: Central Nervous System is the body’s electrical and chemical
communication system • DEC: Drug Evaluation and Classification • DRE: Drug Recognition Expert is a highly specialized officer who has
completed hundreds of hours of training and experience in detecting drug impaired drivers, medical rule‐outs, and the types of drugs affecting the subject
• DRE Reconstruction: when no DRE evaluation was done, a review of facts and information by an experienced DRE to form an opinion on drug pharmacokinetics can be done in many cases by reviewing driving, medical, and jail information
• EIA: See ELISA • ELISA: Enzyme Linked Immuno‐Sorbent Assay is a fast and efficient
screening technique that uses antibodies and colors to identify a substance for subsequent GCMS, LCMS, or GCFID confirmation
• Elute: exit (eluent is a substance that has exited) • EMIT: Enzyme Multiplied Immunoassay Technique is a similar screening
method to ELISA which uses antibodies to bind to certain specified chemicals for quick screening and detection
• GCFID: Gas Chromatography with Flame Ionization Detection is the principle method for determining the type and quantity of volatiles in fluids, most notably alcohol types: ethanol, isopropanol, etc.
• GCMS: Gas Chromatography Mass Spectroscopy is the principle method for determining the type and quantity of substances in fluids for drugged driving cases
• Headspace: the closed gaseous space of matter above liquids or solids • LCMS: Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectroscopy • Metabolite: chemical by‐product produced by the body in response to the
introduction of a foreign substance (metabolic process is the body’s mechanism for changing chemical compounds)
• Active: has impairing qualities • Inactive: does not have impairing qualities
• Neurotransmitters: the body’s chemical and electrical pathways used to transmit messages about body functions
• NHTSA: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is the primary federal government agency responsible for highway safety, impaired driving enforcement, and grants
• Parasympathetic Nerves: neurotransmitters that control the body’s vital functions, i.e. organ functions
• Pipette: device used to extract a small and accurate amount of fluid from a vial or tube (pipetting is a verb)
• Retention Time: the amount of time measured between injection of a substance into the column and detection at the end
• SPE: Solid Phase Extraction is a separation process whereby certain compounds are concentrated and separated from other compounds for use in screening with ELISA, EIA, EMIT or others
• Sympathetic Nerves: neurotransmitters that control the body’s fight or flight responses (i.e. motor skills)
• Synergistic: the opposite of antagonistic responses where the chemical effects of two or more substances combine to affect different functions
*The terms and acronyms contained in this document are intended as a general
guide for law enforcement and prosecutors, not as a scientific article.