fernando fonseca - brazil infrastructure...

Fernando Fonseca Director

New York, November 5th, 2014

The biggest economy in Latina

America

7th biggest economy in the World *Source: International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Database, April 2013

Total Area 8.514.876 Km²

States 27

Coastline 8.511 Km

Population 195 millions

Países América Latina e Caribe

% GDP 2011

Brasil 33,1%

México 28,2%

Argentina 8,1%

Colômbia 5,7%

Venezuela 5,3%

Chile 4,6%

Perú 3,5%

Demais Países 11,4%

469 406 387

430

543

770 840 871 844

587 645

554 504

554

664

882

1.089

1.367

1.651 1.626

2.144

2.475

2.247

2.240

52 53 56 64 77 96 101 113 109 97 111 114 108 122 160 192 229 281

371 281

384 482 466 482

360 350 341 347 360

388 386 414 443

436 485 506 529

571 621 649 693

755 768 733

834 886 904

931

1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

US$

Bilhões

PIB and Trade Flow, Ports and Private Terminals 2003 - 2012, in US$

billions

PIB (US$ Bilhões)

Corrente de comércio (US$ Bilhões)

Carga movimentada em portos e TUP

4,79X

9,27X

2,59X

84%

16%

Exportation- US$ FOB

Marítimo

Outros 98%

2%

Exportation - Tons

Presidency of the Republic

CONIT

MT SAC

Maritime, Fluvial and Lacustrine

Ports

Way and Waterways Mode

including IP4 Airway Mode

ANTT ANAC ANTAQ

EPL

Port Authorities CAP/CONAP/CLAP

DNIT INPH INFRAERO

CONAPORTOS:

MPOG, ANTAQ, MD, MAPA,

MF, MJ, MDIC

SEP

Law nº 12.815/13 – Port Sector Organizational structure

Sep´s Institutional

Strengthening

New Institutional Arrangement of the Port Sector (Law nº 12.815/2013)

SEP

Coordinates the sectoral planning

(prepare the PNLP and PGO, and approves the

PDZs)

GRANTING POWER

The POLICY starts to include the

fluvial and lacustrine ports

ANTAQ´s Institutional

Strengthening

New Institutional Arrangement of the Port Sector (Law nº 12.815/2013)

ANTAQ

Regulate and directly inspects the leasing

contracts, concession and authorization, as well as

being an actor in the delegation’s contract

Linked to SEP

Conducts the bidding

procedures of GRANTING

Port Facilities Forms of

Exploitation

Concession

Delegation

Lease

Authorization

Organized Port

Transfer by agreement

Onerous assignment (by bidding) of public area and infrastructure within the organized port

Right of exploitation of port facilities outside the organized port by contract of adhesion

Total/Partial of the Organized Port = Model Flexibility

Increase in ports

competitiveness

(Investments by the

Private Sector)

Modernization and

optimization of

port’s

infrastructure and

superstructure

Affordability and

advertising of

port’s and prices

Stimulus to port

modernization

Increase in the

infrastructure

supply by the

private sector

Stimulus to intra

and inter

competition

New Regulatory Framework Guidelines

The N

ew

Law

Fundam

enta

ls • Face existing bottleneck

• Provide supply shock through port infrastructure enlargement

• Optimization of organized ports exploitation (public ports)

• Facilitate the private terminals implantation (end of exclusive operation requirement or preponderant own cargo)

• Planning with integration between the transport’s modes, considering the productive chains and their logistical needs

• Increase the port sector competition

• Improve the quality of port service

• Reduce costs

AMAZONAS PARÁ

AMAPÁ RORAIMA

RODÔNIA

MATO GROSSO

TOCANTINS

GOIÁS

MATO GROSSO DO SUL

MARANHÃO

PIAUÍ

CEARÁ RIO GRANDE DO NORTE

PERNAMBUCO

ALAGOAS

BAHIA

MINAS GERAIS

SÃO PAULO

PARANÁ

SANTA CATARINA

RIO GRANDE DO SUL

SERGIPE

ACRE

MANAUS

SANTARÉM

BELÉM

VILA DO CONDE

ITAQUI

FORTALEZA

AREIA BRANCA

NATAL

CABEDELO

SUAPE

MACEIÓ

SALVADOR

ARATU

ILHÉUS

BARRA DO RIACHO

VITÓRIA

RIO DE JANEIRO

ITAGUAÍ (Sepetiba)

SÃO SEBASTIÃO

SANTOS

PARANAGUÁ

SÃO FRANCISCO DO SUL

ITAJAÍ

IMBITUBA

PELOTAS

RIO GRANDE

MACAPÁ

RECIFE

NITERÓI

FORNO

ANTONINA

ANGRA DOS REIS

PORTO ALEGRE

LAGUNA

ORGANIZED PORTS (PUBLICS)

34

Port Facilities – Concession and Lease

Type of Concession

Concession’s Description

FULL Delegation of port administration functions and direct and indirect port facilities exploitation.

PARTIAL Performance of port administration functions and indirect exploitation. Prohibited the direct port facilities exploitation.

EMPTY Total or partial performance of port administration functions. Prohibited the direct and indirect port facilities exploitation.

•Onerous assignment of public area and infrastructure

•Inside organized port

•Not to be confused with port operation

Lease

•Onerous assignment of organized port

•Aim at the administration and exploitation of the organized port infrastructure

•Right period

Concession

INCREASE

HANDLING

• Systemic Planning

• Gains of Scale

• Bidding for greater handling

capacity or lower tariff

• Competition’s Increase

• Ports’ Reorganization

• Long Term Planning

REDUCE COST

INCREASE

EFFICIENCE

Terminals in vertically integrated chains or healthy competition environment

• Biddings for greater handling capacity

• To induce new investments

Terminals characterized by the service to others

• Bidding for lower tariff

• Reduced port’s costs

• Guarantee of isonomic access to users

Requirements:

• Minimum investments

• Minimum productivity

• Minimum static capacity

Ceiling tariff if: • Risk of excessive price • Need of equality in service

Bidding terminals by handling capacity

Minimum handling if: • Avoid idleness of the terminal • Ensure access for any users

Bidding terminals by lower tariff

4 blocks for bidding

85 leases (R$ 13.8 billions)

Block 1: Belém, Santarém, Vila do Conde e Santos


Block 2: Paranaguá, Aratu, Salvador e São Sebastião


Blocks 3: Macapá, Cabedelo, Fortaleza, Itaqui, Maceió, Recife,

Suape


Block 4: Itaguaí, Rio de Janeiro, Niterói, Vitória, Itajaí, Imbituba, São Francisco do Sul, Porto Alegre e Rio

Grande


Note: involve due contracts or to

become due until 2017 and green field projects

Status: Oct/2014

Legal Base:

Art. 57 Law nº. 12.815/2013 regulated by Portaria SEP nº 349, 30/09/2014,

Requirement:

Early realization of the investments

Current situation:

24 applications (investment of R$ 11.7 billions)

Status: Oct/2014

AMAPÁ

RORAIMA

RODÔNIA

MATO GROSSO

TOCANTINS

GOIÁS

MATO GROSSO DO SUL

SÃO PAULO

PARANÁ

MARANHÃO

PIAUÍ

CEARÁ

PERNAMBUCO

RIO GRANDE DO NORTE

SERGIPE

PARÁ

ACRE

MINAS GERAIS

RIO GRANDE DO SUL

SANTA CATARINA

AMAZONAS

BAHIA

PRIVATE PORT TERMINALS GRANTED

159

Status: Oct/2014

Mode

Call or public announcement

TUP, ETC, IP4, IPT

Formalization

Adhesion Contract

Who signs is the

grantor

Deadline

25 years

Consecutively

extendable

ANTAQ

Ensures investment schedules

May require guarantees or

impose sanctions

Procedure

Requirement to ANTAQ

Grantor analyses the

locational viability

Condition of Grant

Compliance with the art. 27 of the

Decree nº 8.033/13

Documentation

Locational Viability (SEP)

(non or one or another players)

Application to

ANTAQ done by the

interested (art. 27 of

the Decree nº

8.033/13)

ANTAQ publishes the

requirement until 5

days of the

application (internet)

ANTAQ until 10 days

promotes the public

announcement with

30 days to others

interested

manifestation

Originated in

SEP (art. 28

of the Decree

nº 8.033/13)

ANTAQ

publishes on

its website

Until 30 days

for

manifestation

MT MT

MG

GO

MG MS

28 Authorizations Issued - New Legal Framework

26 Contracts issued R$ 7,664.19 millions

2 Additional Terms - AT (Expansion)

R$ 2,257.29 millions

1 Additional Term - AC (Capacity Increase)

R$ 165.00 millions

Total R$ 10,086.48 millions

New Authorizations 4 TUPs, 8 ETC

New Authorizations 3 TUPs

New Authorizations 1ETC

New Authorizations 7 TUPs, 1 ETC, 2 TA, 1 AC

New Authorizations 1 TUP, 1 IPT

Private Port Facilities Authorized and Signed Contracts

Total Authorized 39 TUPs, 13 ETC

Total Authorized 21 TUPs


Total Authorized 30 TUPs, 1 IPT


159 Private Port Facilities Authorized

142 Private Terminals - TUPs

16 Cargo Transhipment Stations - ETCs

1 Tourism Port Facilities - IPT

Status: Out/2014

MT MT

MG

GO

MG MS

SC

RESUMO – TERMINAIS PRIVADOS

13 enterprises R$ 332.87 millions

1 enterprise R$ 547.00 millios


17 enterprises R$ 9,664.78 millions


Empreendimentos com processo de outorga de autorização em andamento

Private Port Facilities Foreseen (Ongoing Public Announcement Processes)

Status: Oct/2014

44 Ongoing Authorization of Grant

29 Private Terminals – TUPs

R$ 11,092.94 millions

14 Cargo Transhipment Stations – ETCs

R$ 321.43 millions

1 Tourism Port Facilities – IPT

R$ 3.50 millions

Total R$ 11,417.87 millions

Thank you!

Fernando Fonseca Director

[email protected] +55(61)2029-6504

National Waterway Transportation Agency

fernando fonseca - brazil infrastructure...

Documents