federal enterprise architecture (iti lob)

Federal Enterprise Architecture (FEA)IT Infrastructure LoB Meeting

June 5, 2008

Kshemendra [email protected]

Chief Architect

Office of Management and Budget

For more information see notes page.

mailto:[email protected]

Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government 2

Agenda

• Introductions

• Key Messages

• Federal Enterprise Architecture (FEA) 101

• Annual Assessment – Today and Tomorrow

• FEA Budget Visualization – Vertical vs. Horizontal

• Next Generation Practice Guidance (NGPG)

• Practical Guide to Federal Service Oriented Architecture (PGFSOA)

• Questions & Discussion


Key Messages

• Purpose of Enterprise Architecture is to Improve Performance (Functional & Quality), Avoid Cost, and Save Money

• Shared Leadership – Shared Results

• Segment Architectures are the Key

• Problems & Solutions are Cross Boundary


FEA Context – Business Case Scoring

PMA PM AS PI SE PR EA AA* RM PB Total

Government-wide Average 3.4 3.7 3.0 3.6 3.7 3.2 3.9 3.5 3.5 3.1 35Perfect Evaluation 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 50

Exhibit 300 Evaluations Profile - Government-wide AverageEvaluation Sections

0

1

2

3

4

5PMA

PM

AS

PI

SE

PR

EA

AA*

RM

PB

Government-w ide Average

Perfect Evaluation

Exhibit 300 Evaluations Profile - Agency X

* - As AA Section is not completed/submitted for Steady State Investments, PM Evals were used.


Business Reference Model (BRM)• Lines of Business• Agencies, customers, partners

Service Component Reference Model (SRM)• Service domains, service types• Business and service components

Technical Reference Model (TRM)• Service component interfaces, interoperability• Technologies, recommendations

Data Reference Model (DRM)• Business-focused data standardization • Cross-agency information exchanges

Bu

siness-D

riven A

pp

roa

chB

usin

ess-Driven

Ap

pro

ach

Performance Reference Model (PRM)

• Inputs, outputs, and outcomes• Uniquely tailored performance indicators

Co

mp

on

ent-B

ased

Arch

itecture

Co

mp

on

ent-B

ased

Arch

itecture

FEA Context – Reference Models


FEA Context – Architecture Levels


Transition Strategy / Federal Transition Framework

Targ

et

EA

wit

h S

eg

men

tsInterim Target 1

Cu

rren

t E

A “

Base

lin

e”

Baseli

ne

Seg

men

tA

rch

itect

ure

Program B

Project 1Project 2Project 3Project 4Project 5

Project 6Project 7Project 8Project 9


PerformanceImprovement

Summary

Program A

Program D

Transition Strategy

Interim Target 2

Interim Target 3

Base

lin

eS

eg

men

tA

rch

itect

ure

Seg

men

tA

rch

itect

ure


Program C

Bas

elin

eS

eg

men

tA

rch

ite

ctu

re

Lin

e o

f B

usin

ess

Seg

me

nt

Arc

hit

ect

ure

Seg

men

tA

rch

itect

ure

Exhibit 53(All IT Investments)

Exhibit 300

53 Line Item

53 Line Item

Exhibit 300

Exhibit 300 53 Line Item

Major IT Investments

53 Line Item

53 Line Item

53 Line Item

Program and Project Milestones:• Performance Improvement• Cost Savings / Cost Avoidance

53 Line Item

Cross-Agency Initiatives (FTF)


Annual Assessment – Framework

Architect Invest ImplementIntegrated IT Lifecycle

Completion Use Results

Cost Savings and Cost Avoidance Transition Strategy Performance Enterprise Architecture Value IPv6

Governance and Program Mgt. Change Mgt. and Deployment Segment Architectures/

Collaboration and Reuse CPIC Integration

Performance Architecture Business Architecture Data Architecture Service Component

Architecture Technology Architecture Transition Strategy

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)*

4.0 4.0 4.0Threshold for GREEN

Evaluation of Measures and Metrics

Assignment of Policies and Procedures

Review of ArtifactsHow


Proposed Changes to Assessment Framework

Architect Invest ImplementIntegrated IT Lifecycle

Completion Use Results

Indirect Indicators (PART, IT as a percent of discretionary spend)

Attributable, Causal Results Implementation of ETP

EA Policy & Process, CPIC Process Integration

Measured Alignment between ETP and Portfolio of 300s & 53

Performance Mgmt Integration

Any Segments

Priority Segments: Core Mission (RMO Input) IT Infra & Info Sharing

Proposed Evolution

4.0 4.0 4.0Threshold for GREEN

Delivery against planned improvement commitments

Use of segment codes to measure alignment

Template-based

segment submissionsHow


FEA Budget Visualization – Federal IT Budget

* Dollars shown in millions

Federal IT Spending by AgencyNumber of

Investments Total DME SSDepartment of Agriculture 235 $2,429 $477 $1,952Department of Commerce 146 $2,295 $877 $1,418Department of Defense 2,194 $33,032 $11,945 $21,087Department of Education 229 $593 $55 $539Department of Energy 651 $2,038 $208 $1,830Department of Health and Human Services 684 $5,681 $1,017 $4,663Department of Homeland Security 343 $5,317 $1,731 $3,586Department of Housing and Urban Development 82 $313 $52 $262Department of the Interior 236 $965 $139 $826Department of Justice 234 $2,750 $902 $1,848Department of Labor 137 $542 $102 $439Department of State 103 $1,045 $241 $805U.S. Agency for International Development 39 $103 $36 $67Department of Transportation 321 $2,981 $1,604 $1,377Department of the Treasury 305 $3,061 $563 $2,499Department of Veterans Affairs 84 $2,534 $640 $1,894U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 29 $392 $37 $356Environmental Protection Agency 157 $455 $92 $363General Services Administration 82 $558 $84 $473National Aeronautics and Space Administration 43 $1,874 $348 $1,527National Archives and Records Administration 26 $136 $72 $64National Science Foundation 24 $83 $20 $63Nuclear Regulatory Commission 53 $155 $35 $120Office of Management and Budget 3 $5 $1 $4Office of Personnel Management 37 $89 $19 $69Small Business Administration 31 $85 $15 $70Smithsonian Institution 24 $66 $5 $61Social Security Administration 34 $1,139 $342 $798

Federal Grand Total: 6,566 $70,716 $21,657 $49,060

Agency FY2009 Request


Co

re

Mis

sio

nB

usi

nes

s S

ervi

ces

En

terprise S

ervices

* Dollars shown in millions

FEA Budget Visualization – BRM & SRM View

Services to Citizens 2,291 $29,677 42%Defense and National Security 268 $11,594Health 494 $5,398Transportation 183 $3,128Homeland Security 135 $2,551Community and Social Services 39 $1,188General Science and Innovation 218 $960Environmental Management 173 $860Law Enforcement 89 $834Income Security 34 $591Education 137 $591Disaster Management 129 $575Intelligence Operations 40 $471Economic Development 64 $281Natural Resources 120 $231Correctional Activities 6 $110Workforce Management 42 $107Energy 54 $71International Affairs and Commerce 33 $70Litigation and Judicial Activities 33 $66

Support Delivery of Services 828 $2,987 4%General Government 219 $1,914Planning and Budgeting 248 $455Public Affairs 112 $249Controls and Oversight 156 $224Revenue Collection 27 $79Internal Risk Management and Mitigation 18 $40Regulatory Development 40 $26Legislative Relations 8 $0

Management of Government Resources 3,262 $33,447 47%Information and Technology Management 1,390 $25,894Supply Chain Management 583 $2,605Financial Management 538 $2,448Human Resource Management 480 $1,590Administrative Management 271 $910

FY2009 Request*

Number of Investments

Supporting Services 185 $4,606 7%Management of Processes 22 $2,149Development and Integration 6 $1,506Communication 9 $189Asset / Materials Management 10 $131Systems Management 4 $91Customer Initiated Assistance 8 $87Knowledge Management 20 $81Supply Chain Management 10 $69Security Management 16 $69Human Resources 9 $67Customer Relationship Management 13 $44Knowledge Discovery 4 $34Investment Management 11 $27Document Management 3 $22Data Management 8 $17Tracking and Workflow 7 $9Financial Management 10 $7Reporting 5 $3Collaboration 2 $2Visualization 3 $1Content Management 1 $1Forms Management 2 $0Analysis and Statistics 1 $0Search 1 $0

Number of Investments

FY2009 Request*


Next Generation Practice Guidance (NGPG)

• Goal: Increase the value from, and use of, segment architecture

• Process & Deliverables:– Identify most valuable segment architecture products

and ideas• Self-selected, proven, and supported

– Analyze and index best practices– Synthesize and publish guidance, methodology,

templates, and training materials– Template-based view for segment architectures


NGPG – Targeted Outcomes

• Shared Best Practices

• Faster Time to Complete

• Greater Consistency and Completeness

• Lower Barriers to Reuse– Architectures– Solutions– Services– Information


PGFSOA - Background

• Federal CIO Council

– Architecture & Infrastructure Committee

– American Council on Technology / Industry Advisory Council

• Targeting Chief Architects

– CIOs, & Program Executives

• Goal is to Provide Practical & Useful Guidance

• Leverages Existing Best Practices

• Focus on Federal-Specific Context


PGFSOA – Organization (~70 Pages)

• Executive Summary & Acknowledgements

• Introduction

• Rationale

• Target

• Keys to Implementation

• Roadmap

• Glossary & References


PGFSOA – Target

Service Oriented Enterprise · Agreed behaviors and clear incentives for collaboration· Mutually leveraged investments· Enhanced mission outcomes

Service Oriented Architecture

· Interoperability at build time based on open standards and composable adapters

· Agile recapitalization· Centrally-managed registries and repositories

Service Oriented Infrastructure · Secure, scalable infrastructure as a service· Interoperability at run time · Service enabled network


PGFSOA – Review & Revise Process

• Go to the PGFSOA Wiki– http://smw.osera.gov/pgfsoa/index.php/Welcome– Read the “PGFSOA QuickStart for Contributors”– Read the document (including list of contributors)– Look at the discussion pages and recent contributions– Make attributes contributions– Track the evolution of the document including your input

• Web 2.0 Style Process– version 1.1– Seeking adoption and use on the merits– With use and results, feedback and future iterations

• PGFSOA Editorial Board makes final decisions– Based on input – skewing towards Practitioners– Eventually will be put forward to FCIOC for formal endorsement

http://smw.osera.gov/pgfsoa/index.php/Welcome


Questions and Discussion

Key Messages:

• Purpose of Enterprise Architecture is to Improve Performance (Functional & Quality), Avoid Cost, and Save Money

• Shared Leadership – Shared Results

• Segment Architectures are the Key

• Problems & Solutions are Cross Boundary


For Further Information:www.egov.gov

http://www.egov.gov/

federal enterprise architecture (iti lob)

Documents

meritswith use

index best practicessynthesize

performance functional

pgfsoa wikihttp

pgfsoa quickstart

keyproblems solutions

completegreater consistency

final decisionsbased