Facilities Presentation

2007

Overview

• Purpose of meeting• Structure of meeting

High School

Actual and Projected Grades 9-12 Enrollment

3200

3500

3800

4100

4400

4700

5000

5300

92-9

3

93-9

4

94-9

5

95-9

6

96-9

7

97-9

8

98-9

9

99-0

0

00-0

1

01-0

2

02-0

3

03-0

4

04-0

5

05-0

6

06-0

7

07-0

8

08-0

9

09-1

0

10-1

1

11-1

2

12-1

3

13-1

4

14-1

5

15-1

6

16-1

7

17-1

8

18-1

9

19-2

0

20-2

1

21-2

2

22-2

3

Mar

ch 9

5 M

easu

re N

(Fai

ls)

Nov

embe

r 95

Mea

sure

A (F

ails

)

Apr

il 98

Mea

sure

A (P

asse

s)

Aug

ust 0

2 C

anyo

n Vi

ew E

IR C

ertif

ied

May

04

Can

yon

View

Site

Pur

chas

ed

School Years

Site

Acq

uisi

tion

begi

ns

Enrollment Projections Prepared by: JM King Associates 2006

Student Enrollment projections from 1994/95

Current Options for High School Students

• Comprehensive High School• Online Courses• College Connection• Smaller Learning Communities• Independent Study• Career Technical Education• Charter Schools• Academy for Change• Fair View High School• Concurrent Enrollment• Loma Vista School• Opportunity Program• Regional Occupational Programs

Future Options Under Consideration for High School Students

• Online High School• Early College High School• Additional Career Technical Education

Opportunities– PVHS: Building Trades & Construction (Residential and Commercial Pathway)– CHS: Arts, Media & Entertainment Industry (CTE Restructuring Plan)– PVHS: Manufacturing & Product Development (Welding Technology Pathway)

Recommendations from February 2007 Board Facilities Workshop

• Online High School Facility using modified existing facilities (Pending Board Approval targeted to open January 2008.)

• PVHS Performing Arts Center (Pending Board approval-targeted bid 2008.)

• CHS Classrooms (Awaiting Board approval for architect selection.)

• Early College High School (Pending further negotiations with Butte College.)

• Career Technical Education (modernization)

K-8

K-8 Educational Options

•Neighborhood Schools•Open Structure (K-8)•Charter Schools•Academics Plus•Gifted and Talented Education (GATE)•Two-way Spanish Immersion•Special Education•Innovative Preschool (Partnership)•Independent Study (K-8)•Opportunity Classes (7-8)•Form 10’s

•Charter Schools•Increase in Special Education students•Changing demographics•Changing family needs•No Child Left Behind and Parent Choice legislation

Changing Face of Education

500

1500

2500

3500

4500

5500

9-30-07 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17

PI Schools Capacity

PI Schools Projected Enrollment(Chapman, Citrus, McManus,Parkview, Rosedale)

Non-PI Schools Capacity(Emma Wilson, Hooker Oak, Little Chico Creek, Marigold, Neal Dow, Shasta, Sierra View)

Non-PI Schools Projected Enrollment

Enrollment Projections by NCLB Status

Enrollment Projections by Geographical Area

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17

North Chico Schools Practical Capacity

South Chico Schools Practical Capacity

South Chico Schools Projected Enrollment

North Chico Schools Projected Enrollment

Junior High

Junior High Enrollment Projections

The above capacities assume full utilization of all available classroom space.

K-8 Needs Considerations

•New school at Henshaw/Guynn site

•New school sites in southeast or southwest Chico

•Modernization

How do we decide to best spend our dollars?

At any given point in time, facility needs will generally exceed available resources. The District must have a method of determining where to apply available resources to get the best “bang for the buck”.

Facility Prioritization Criteria

The following criteria are intended to provide assistance in prioritizing proposed facility projects:

•Provide appropriate, sustainable, safe educational facilities for all students.•Identify and prepare for demographic shifts and the changing face of education.•Maximize utilization of underutilized facilities.•Maximize use of appropriate funding sources including State funds.•Provide adequate support facilities for all schools.•Minimize loss of buying power due to inflation.

Measure A Ballot Language - 1998

“Shall Chico Unified School District construct an additional high school to reduce classroom overcrowding; build and renovate additional classrooms and school facilities; renovate school bathrooms; replace old heating, cooling and ventilation systems; repair worn-out playgrounds and pavement; improve student drop-off zones in front of elementary schools; acquire school site and classrooms; and install wiring to support classroom technology by issuing $48,725,000 of bonds at an interest rate within the legal limit?”

Summary of Funding Resources

Developer Fees $ 6,692,000 Available Balance

Measure A $ 9,950,000 Available Balance

Measure A $ 30,725,000 Unissued

State Income $ TBD Requires State approval

District staff will aggressively pursue access to State dollars for new construction and modernization.

1,000,000

1,480,620

0

200,000

400,000

600,000

800,000

1,000,000

1,200,000

1,400,000

1,600,000

Apr-98 Aug-07

Construction Cost Increases

Construction costs have increased over the last ten years. The OPSC Construction Cost Index reflects a 48.06% increase from April 1998 to August 2007. The same project costing $1,000,000 in April 1998 would cost $1,480,620 in August of 2007.

Decreased Buying Power

The $30,000,000 of authorized but not issued bonds is beingimpacted by inflation. We are losing $125,000 per month inbuying power with 5% inflation. This totals $1,500,000 peryear.

30,000,000

28,500,000

0

5,000,000

10,000,000

15,000,000

20,000,000

25,000,000

30,000,000

2007 2008

We need your feedback!!

• Table designations –•K-8th

•9th-12th

•Funding Resources•Proposed Projects

• Comment/Suggestion Box --

• Contact Information --

Questions and Answers