exposing the cyberbully by nancy e. marden submitted in
TRANSCRIPT
Exposing the Cyberbully
By Nancy E. Marden
Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the
Requirements for a
Degree in Writing
General Writing Option
May 11, 2010
WRT 465/Thesis Advisor: Prof. John Briggs
Abstract
This thesis takes a close look at the dynamics that make school-aged
bullies not only dangerous, but too often deadly. Today’s bullies have a new
“playground” called cyberspace, where they can harass, humiliate and threaten
their victims: They are called cyberbullies. In the United States as many as 35-45
percent of teens admit to being victims or engaging in online bullying. As a result
of advancing technology and internet accessibility combined with over two
hundred social websites, cyberbullying is escalating.
1
Table of Contents
Abstract…………………………………………………………………………1 Introduction..........................................................................................................3 Defining Cyberbullying .......................................................................................5 What Makes a Child a Target. .............................................................................7 Why Some Children Bully……………………………………………………..10 Role of the Bystander...................……………………………………………..13 Indirect Cyberbullying
Flaming……… ……………………………………………………………15 Impersonation… .……………………………………………………….....15 Outing and Trickery….……………………………………………………15
Direct Cyberbullying Denigration…………… .………………………………………………….16 Harassment and Stalking..…………………………………………………17 Exclusion…………………...……………………………………………...18
Bullying Statistics……… ............................................ ……………………19-22 Cyberbullying Laws: Connecticut Statute…………… ........ ……………...23-25
H.R. 1966 Megan Meier Cyberbullying Prevention Act Bill… ..…………24 H.R. 3630 The AWARE Act Bill……………………………… ..………..24
When Bullying Becomes Deadly……………………………………. ……26-28 Lifelong Affects ……………………………………………………………29-32 The Latest Social Website……………………………………………………..33 Responsibility Beyond the Playground (Connecticut School Policy)… ..... 33-37 Conclusion ................................................................................................... 38-39 Works Cited………………………………………………………… ..... …44-49
2
Introduction
School-yard bullies are nothing new. The consequences of bullying affect
everyone: At some point in our lives we have either witnessed bullying, been the
target of it or even the one doing the bullying. We all have stories about it, seen it
in portrayed in the movies and television (the characters “Butch” from the Little
Rascals or “Regina” form the movie Mean Girls). In typical scenarios, the bully
is portrayed as controlling and intimidating in order to get his or her way.
Children who bully are much more complex than these characters, yet the
common denominator seems to be the same; all bullies need a victim.
Most people accept that there will always be a childhood bully, and they
assume the bully will outgrow it and move on. But, the alarming fact is that about
25 percent of all school-aged bullies will have a criminal record by the time they
are an adult.
Traditional methods used by the bully to intimidate and control include;
the use of verbal threats, physical threats (pushing, hitting, spitting), emotional or
passive methods of spreading vicious rumors or snickering. But a more recent
and increasingly popular method of bullying has become known as
‘cyberbullying.’ This new “virtual playground” is being used by bullies who
exploit the immediacy and far-reaching audience of the internet, via social
websites such as Facebook, MySpace, YouTube, Formsrping.me, Twitter, IM's
3
(instant messaging), and texting via cell phones. Children as young as 5 years old
are using social websites for communication; and that number is increasing daily.
4
Defining Cyberbullying
“Cyberbullying is being cruel to others by sending or posting harmful
material or engaging in other forms of social cruelty using the Internet or other
digital technologies. It has various forms, including direct harassment and
indirect activities that are intended to damage the reputation or interfere with the
relationships of the student targeted, such as posting harmful material,
impersonating the person, disseminating personal information or images, or
activities that result in exclusion.” (Willard).
Cyberbullying is even more powerful than traditional bullying because the
bully has a much larger audience allowing the attack to be more devastating for
the victim while the bully can remain anonymous. Alex Bioanghu, a guidance
counselor at Whisconier Middle School in Brookfield, Connecticut, said children
who cyberbully engage in a term he calls “disinhibition effect,” where “there is a
psychology of cyberspace that lends itself to certain behaviors; (where children)
are known to say or do things they might not do face-to-face…” (Danbury News-
Times, March 14, 2009).
The 2006 National School Safety Center (NSSC) published Bullying in
Schools- Fight the Bully Battle fact sheets which are used to teaching and training
in the school communities. Bullying is considered an act of violence, whether it
is verbal, physical or emotional. According to research, it is shown that boys tend
5
to bully physically or directly, while girls bully emotionally or indirectly.
Bullying or cyberbullying can take on a sexual form of harassment. Name
calling such as: “fag,” “slut,” “whore,” “pussy,” etc., imply that the gender being
attacked is lacking in what is deemed socially acceptable by teens. Even if these
statements are not true, they have long-lasting emotional affects on the victim.
Males tend to bully more aggressively, whether it is physically or while “online
gaming.” Of the 21-30 percent of cyberbullies, almost all of them have made
rude, nasty or mean comments. This was followed by spreading rumors,
threatening or aggressive comments and finally embarrassing their targets.
(Internet Solutions for Kids, Inc.)
A very popular forum for entertainment and socializing is the ability to
play video games over the internet against another opponent through gaming
systems like Xbox. This type of venue increases the level of competition and
chances for online bullying among teens.
Indirect (passive or relational) bullying is used mostly by females which is
a “systemic diminishment of self, which is done through ignoring, isolating,
excluding, or shunning…it can involve rolling of the eyes, sneers, or hostile body
language.” (Donohoe and Burger).
“Current estimates indicate that 20 to 35 percent of children and
adolescents report experiencing cyberbullying (Diamandurous, Downs, &
Jenkins). A study which only included students under age 17 indicated that about
6
one-third of girls and one-third of males were equally bullied. It was estimated
that in 2006 that more than 13 million children and adolescents ages 6 to 17 were
victims (Feinberg & Robey 2009).
According to the Connecticut Department of Education, there are currently
572,293 students enrolled in the school system. That would equate to
approximately 114,000 to 200,000 students who admit to have been cyberbullied
in Connecticut alone. In the United States, Web Wise Kids reports that as many
as 43 percent of teens were victims of cyber bullying in 2008.
The highest numbers of victims occur with middle school students, and
statistics show that this age group tends to receive electronic harassment
(cyberbullying) by instant messaging, followed by chat rooms and then emails,
with only about half of them knowing who is bullying them (Kowalski &
Limber).
Most victims do not tell anyone, unfortunately “only five percent of
middle school kids who are cyberbullied tell a parent (because) experts say the
victims are ashamed of being bullied, and my worry that their parents will take
their computer or cell phone away.” (WR News, Sr. Ed. 2008).
In an anonymous online Web-based survey of almost 1,500 middle to
high school-aged children, 90 percent said they did not tell a parent or adult they
had been bullied online (Juvonen & Gross, 2008).
7
Cyberbullying, as well as traditional bullying has a three way dynamic
that includes; the target (victim), the bully (offender) and the bystander
(audience).
What Makes a Child a Target?
A child usually becomes a target if they are different in some way, based
on: special education, race, overweight, disability or some kind, religion, etc, and
they tend to be sensitive, passive, and come from caring and loving homes. They
are perceived as 'weak' and easily become targets. According to the National
Association of School Psychologists there are certain characteristics of children
that make them targets for bullies:
• Vulnerable, immature, or socially naïve teens who may lack sufficient knowledge and skills to engage in effective decision-making
• Younger teens who may have overprotective or naive parents but who likely have healthy peer relations and good values
• Youth who have temporarily impaired relations with parents and/or peers and are currently highly emotionally upset
• Youth who face major ongoing challenges related to personal mental health and disruptions in relations with parents, school, and/or peers (Demeray & Brown, 2009).
Victims, or ‘targets’ also often feel isolated, fearful, anxious, withdrawn, do
not want to go to school and can become vengeful, according to NSSC. Some
8
consequences of being bullied include: bullying others, committing suicide and
seeking revenge.
According to www.webmd.com, children who are bullied tend to be:
Sensitive;
Socially withdrawn, they think poorly of themselves, or may have a quiet temperament;
Anxious;
Passive, they often let others be in control and do not stand up for themselves; and
More likely to get depressed.
Targets were harassed by older teens aged 13 -17 rather than 10-12 year-
olds, with about half of the bullies being male, 30 percent female, and 20 percent
unknown to the victim. Further, about half of the victims knew their harasser as
being from school while the other half had no idea who the perpetrator was.
(www.cyberbully411.com).
9
Why Some Children Bully
“Children who bullied tended to be aggressive and lacking in a moral
compass and they experienced a lot of conflict in their relationships with their
parents. In addition, their relationships with friends also were marked by a lot of
conflict, and they tended to associate with others who bullied” (Science Daily,
March 27, 2008). By looking at how a child relates to those around him or her,
will give an good indication as to whether or not they are prone to bully, offline or
online.
As for gender differentiation, female and male teens who engaged in
cyberbullying or electronic aggression were equally likely to harass others online;
whereas boys were more likely to harass others by traditional bullying methods.
Cyberbullies were more likely to be aggressive and break rules more often, were
reported being depressed or withdrawn twice as often as teens that did not harass
others online.(Internet solutions for Kids, Inc).
Another contributing factor to becoming a bully is retaliation: “Twenty-
seven percent of girls who were bullied online retaliated back with their own
cyberbullying.” (Cengage Learning).
The bully gains a sense of power and control when he/she bullies their
target. “Bullying behaviors that continue into adulthood can turn into child abuse,
domestic violence and other criminal activities.” (Quiroz, Arnette and Stevens).
10
“Boys who were identified as bullies in middle school were four times as likely as
non-bullying peers to have more than one criminal conviction by age 24.”
(HRSA).
There is a psychological profile or makeup for children who bully other
children. Characteristics of children who bully, according to US Department of
Health and Human Services:
• impulsive, hot-headed, dominant;
• easily frustrated;
• lack empathy;
• have difficulty following rules;
• view violence in a positive way; and
• tend to be physically stronger than other children
(US Dept. of Health and Human Services, HRSA)
Further, the US Department of Health and Human Services reports that
family risk factors include: a lack of warmth and involvement on the part of
parents; overly permissive parenting; lack of supervision; harsh, physical
discipline and / or a model of bullying behavior. There are many myths about
bullies; that they are “loners” and have “low self-esteem”, but they actually make
friends easily and have friends that encourage their behavior, as well as having
good self-esteem, according to HRSA.
11
Bullying can be a sign of other serious antisocial or violent behavior and
are more likely to:
• Get into frequent fights
• Be injured in a fight
• Vandalize property
• Steal property
• Drink alcohol
• Smoke
• Be truant from school
• Drop out of school
• Cary a weapon
(US Dept. of Health and Human Services, HRSA)
Moreover, in a study released in a journal in the Society for Research in
Child Development, Inc., “The evolutionary and developmental importance of
affection has also been shown and established as a universal goal…it seems to be
a safe assumption that bullies, like other human beings, want to realize status and
affection.” (Veenstra et al.) The study further theorizes why bullies will risk one
of these two (status v affection) in order to achieve one or the other. “Thus,
Bullies can be expected to strategically choose victims who are already rejected
(disliked) by significant others in the class.” (Veenstra et al).
Further, bullies also tend to bully their same gender, although not always
12
the rule. By males bullying the same gender, they select victims “who pose a
minimal risk for a loss of affection….male bullies are likely to choose those girls
as victims who are rejected by boys.”
The Role of the Bystander
Bystanders are the audience who “witness” the bully’s attack on his or her
victim. Bystanders either become a participant (bully by proxy), by joining in on
Web pages and leaving hurtful or nasty comments, or by simply doing nothing
except observe the bullying behavior, which in turn condones the behavior. The
reason most bystanders do not intervene, whether in person or online, is for fear
of becoming the target. This in turn only enforces the behavior as acceptable,
especially if nothing is done to stop it, according to NSSC. It becomes a form of
social acceptance.
Ironically, it is the bystanders that have the most power in the dynamic,
not the bully. Children are influenced greatly by their peers and tend to follow the
flow or current trends, thereby setting acceptable social behaviors (Rigby). A
study in Australia found several reasons that support addressing the bystanders in
order to reduce bullying:
• Most bullying takes place when bystanders are present.
• Although most bystanders do not act to discourage it, when any
one of them does there is a good chance (around 50%) that the
13
bullying will stop.
• Teachers generally do not have the opportunity to take any
action because they are typically not present and are not told
about it.
• A large proportion of students would like to see bullying
stopped.
The behaviors that are not addressed in a child’s early age suggesting that
the behavior will carry-over into adulthood, family life and the work place.
Examples of this can be seen where sexual harassment, racism and discrimination
are prevalent in the workplace. Empowering children (bystanders) to believe that
they can make a difference by not tolerating harassment, or any deviant social
behavior, could not only prevent bullying, but set socially acceptable behavior.
14
Cyberbullying: Indirect vs. Direct
Cyberbullying, like traditional bullying, can be either direct or indirect.
There are several forms of cyberbullying that have been labeled as; flaming,
impersonation, outing and trickery, denigration, harassment and stalking and
exclusion.
Indirect Cyberbullying
Flaming is an indirect form of cyberbullying and was defined by Nancy
Willard (who is a recognized authority on issues related to the safe and
responsible use of the Internet) as an argument between two people that includes
rude and vulgar language, insults, and threats. This method of bullying usually
occurs via instant messaging, chat rooms or emails where cyberbullies can
exchange comments back and forth, typically one on one.
Impersonation is breaking into someone else’s email and using it to send
vicious or embarrassing material to others. Lori Drew, whose daughter was a
former friend of the 13 year-old Megan Meier, created a fake MySpace profile
and pretended to be a teen-aged boy interested in Meier. After months of gaining
Meier’s trust, and confidence, Drew used this to cause emotional distress and
stated such comments to Meier as “the world would be a better place without
you.” (Stelter, NYTimes, Nov. 27 2008) Megan Meier was found hanging in her
room shortly after.
15
Outing and trickery is engaging someone in instant messaging and
tricking them into revealing personal or sensitive information and forwarding or
distributing it to others (Willard, 2007).
Direct Cyberbullying
Denigration is a form of direct cyberbullying, according to Willard, is
when a student or students set up a website used to ridicule or damage the
reputation of the victim.
A recent incident occurred at a middle school in Connecticut where an 8th
grade female was the target of a Web page created on Facebook called “I hate
…(Girl’s Name Withheld)” where there were 39 members from the school. The
perpetrators consisted of five male students and one female student who created
the Web page to humiliate the target because they felt she had “ratted” on them.
According to the victim’s mother, “there was no real “incident,” but it started with
some confrontations which included vulgar and sexual comments only occurring
on the school bus.” Some of the actual comments on the Facebook site included:
“She is a parent’s wet dream”
“Whoever created this website is genius, I love this picture”
(Victim’s picture was altered to include horns and pitchfork).
When the target told her parents about the bus incidents, they became involved by
notifying the school. It is believed that this sparked the creation of the webpage.
16
The target only became aware of the webpage when another student told her of it.
The school administration was anonymously informed of the incident and pulled
each of the five students individually who created the webpage and then
addressed the 39 confirmed members who had joined the webpage.
The target’s parents were not aware of the incident until she came home
from school that day. It appears that school administrators are not sure quite how
to handle these types of bullying. The mother of the target was concerned that
comments may have been deleted before they could be copied, and may have
included threats.
Ironically, this all transpired within days of a presentation on cyber safety
and cyberbullying that had been given to all 7th and 8th graders of the same school.
The Brookfield school district had received funding to provide students
with an educational and informative presentation regarding the safety of the
internet. Part of the presentation included a segment on cyberbullying with a
student speaking about his personal experience with being bullied online.
Another troubling fact is that only two parents attended and invitation to view the
same presentation and a chance for Q&A with the school staff. This only
reinforces the need for parental awareness as to the implications of their
children’s unsupervised use of the internet.
Harassment and stalking another form of direct cyberbullying includes
repeatedly sending cruel, vicious, and/or threatening messages.
17
Exclusion is intentionally excluding someone from an online group, this
can be done by “blocking” the individual or “un-friending” them which is a
feature used when you delete a once added “friend” on Facebook.
18
Statistics
Studies show that the use of IMs and Webcams has increased the incidents
of cyberbullying, due to the sharing of pictures and video, by almost three times.
(Juvonen and Gross). Webcams allow live online video chat and the ability to
record what is being transmitted without sender’s permission. Cyberbullies can
directly harass, tape and broadcast live.
Another popular website, YouTube, allows its users to upload videos for
public viewing and commenting. This is just another tool for cyberbullies to
either make fun of their targets by making videos to harass or threaten their
targets or using images of their targets without permission that may be hurtful or
humiliating.
While ninety percent of children 12 years-old and younger say their
parents know where they go online, only 41 percent of children 13-15 years-old
admit their parents really know what sites they visit online, and 25 percent know
“little” or “nothing” about what they do online.(webwisekids.org).
As for social website popularity, “Facebook rules with 400 million
worldwide users, with MySpace in second place with 100 million” (Bazelon).
But when it comes to connecting with their friends, middle school-aged to high
school-aged teens it is the cell phone that dominates technological use for
communication in the form of texting.
19
“Cell phones continue to be the most popular technology utilized by
adolescents with almost 83% of youth in our sample report having used one at
least weekly. A greater proportion of adolescents are now using Facebook
compared to MySpace, and twitter remains unpopular among most youth.”
(www.cyberbullying.us).
20
Bullying victims were two to nine times more likely to report suicidal
thoughts than other children were” (Science Daily Magazine, 2008). Signs of
suicidal behavior include: declining school performance, social isolation, loss of
interest in previously enjoyed activities, change in eating and sleeping habits, and
not wanting to attend school.
“Current estimates indicate that 20 to 35 percent of children and
adolescents report experiencing cyberbullying … A study which only included
students under age 17, indicated 32 percent of boys and 36 percent of girls were
victims of cyberbullying (Hinjuja & Patchin, 2008). It was estimated that in 2006
that more than 13 million children and adolescents ages 6-17 were victims
(Feinberg & Robey 2009). According to the Connecticut Department of
Education, there are currently 572,293 students, or approximately 114,000 to
200,000 students admit to being cyberbullied. In another study, Web Wise Kids
reports that as many as 43 percent of teens were victims of cyber bullying in
2008.
Middle school students tend to be victims of cyberbullying by instant
messaging, followed by chat rooms and then emails with only about half of them
knowing who is bullying them (Kowalski & Limber 2007).
According to Weekly Reader (WR News, Senior Edition 2008), “only five
percent of middle school kids who are cyberbullied tell a parent…experts say the
victims are ashamed of being bullied, and my worry that their parents will take
21
their computer or cell phone away.” In an anonymous online Web-based survey
of almost 1,500 middle to high school-aged children, 90 percent said they did not
tell a parent or adult they had been bullied online (Juvonen & Gross, 2008).
In a study regarding the victimization of adolescent girls, it was found that
about 40 percent of girls cyberbullied, were called names such as: ‘“fat,” “ugly,”
“slut,” “bitch,” and the spreading of gossip – including lies and rumors about the
victim.”(Burgess-Proctor, Hinduja & Patchin). Of the girls who participated in
the study, only 20 percent “never knew who was bullying them.” Whereas 31
percent said it was a friend, and over 36 percent said it was someone from their
school, which included ex-boyfriends. (Burgess-Proctor, Hinduja & Patchin).
More than one third of those bullied online, did not tell anyone. And more
than half (55%) simply did not let it affect them, and dismissed the behavior.
(Burgess-Proctor, Hinduja and Patchin).
22
Cyberbullying Laws
Although the state of Connecticut has statutes regarding bullying in
schools, there are three states that do not: Nebraska, New Jersey and New
Mexico. Some argue that even the statutes that do exist are vague and do not
distinguish between cyberbullying, cyberstalking and cyberharassment, other than
by age of the perpetrator.
Connecticut’s Board of Education gave a deadline to schools to come up
with program/disciplinary for incidents of bullying as of February1, 2009. All
Connecticut schools have a prevention, intervention and disciplinary plan
included in student handbooks and in compliance with the BOE Policy 5131.911
regarding bullying.
“CGS § 10-222(d) requires local and regional board of education to develop and implement policy to address bullying in schools. In short, requiring the ability to report, and have suspected incidents of bullying investigated, provide written reports and include prevention and intervention. Upon repeat offenders (bullies) may include counseling and discipline. The deadline for each local and regional board to submit a policy was February 1, 2009.” In Connecticut, parents are entitled to sue school administrations for
failure to provide safe environments for their children if they are victims of
bullying. Parents of the bullies can be liable up to $5,000 for “willful or
malicious injury caused to others...” (CGS § 52-572). Connecticut attorney, Scott
D. Camassar, says the statute has no specific language regarding cyberbullying,
23
and needs to be added to the books. The legal argument comes down to the First
Amendment’s protection of freedom of speech and what is considered to be
bullying. In other words, what distinguishes a joke, prank or statement of opinion
from a cruel statement intended to cause harm?
On September 30, 2009 there was a Congressional hearing in response to
addressing cyberbullying and online issues facing children addressed the
definition of cyberbullying to also include the use of “rumors or lies or
publication of something meant to be private, or the personification – or
impersonation of another person.” Specifically, there was testimony heard
regarding two bills that would address cyberbullying:
• H.R 1966, the Megan Meier Cyberbullying Prevention Act:
will make it a federal crime, specifically a felony, if technical
communication is used to “coerce, intimidate, harass, or cause
substantial emotional distress… that is repeated and hostile
behavior.”
• H.R. 3630 The Adolescent Web Awareness Requires
Education Act (AWARE Act) will authorize $125 million for
grants to create programs and educate children, schools and
communities.
(Congressional Hearing Transcript Database, Web. 30 Sept.
2009)
24
The first is H.R. 1966, “Megan Meier Cyberbullying Prevention Act,”
which was in response to 13 year-old Megan Meier who committed suicide after
being tormented and harassed by Lori Drew; who was initially found guilty of
failure to comply with the Terms of Service contract for MySpace but was
ultimately overturned. At the time, there were no existing laws in Missouri to
convict Drew criminally. If this bill were to pass it would make cyberbullying a
federal crime punishable up to two years in a federal prison.
Arguments surrounded the issue of what would constitute a criminal act as
opposed to a civil one. The perpetrator of cyberbullying often engages in an
emotional psychological attack on their victims (“intentional infliction of
emotional distress”) through images, words, texts etc., which would be difficult to
categorize as criminal, due to the lack of what the Constitution regard protected
speech considers a “ true threat.” The issue or problem facing lawmakers is the
fine line between free speech or protected speech, and “true threats” which are
those indicating bodily harm, which are exempt from protected speech.
(Congressional Hearing Transcript Database, Web. 30 Sept. 2009).
The difference between being charged with the act cyberbullying vs.
cyberstalking is that cyberstalking involves a “credible threat of harm to the
victim and cyberbullying does not.” (Congressional Hearing et al).
25
When Bullying Becomes Deadly
Ryan Halligan never told his parents that he was being bullied at school.
Ryan was considered ‘Special Ed’ due to speech/motor skill problems through the
fourth grade. By the time he entered the 5th grade was behind the other students
academically, resulting in ridicule and start of his bullying experience. This only
continued and escalated in the 7th grade. Ryan hated school, but he didn’t want
his parents to get involved for fear of the bullying becoming worse. The main
reason for victims not telling someone is due to a fear of retaliation from their
perpetrator. Other reasons include the embarrassment and fear or losing access to
their computer, phones etc.
He spent the summer of 2003 online and began using instant messaging
and revealed intimate personal information. It was not long before he was being
bullied online, and through “outing and trickery” the cyberbully befriended him
having gained his trust only to humiliate and embarrass him by exposing personal
information about Ryan in school. Ryan took his own life on October 8, 2003.
“For too long, we have let kids and adults bully others as a rite of passage into
adulthood…” (John Halligan, Ryan’s father).
In the recent case of Phoebe Prince, a 15 year-old student at South Hadley
High School in Mass., recently took her own life in January 2010 after being
bullied by nine students over the course of a three month period. Of the students
26
charged, two are popular athletes and honor roll students. This supports the
“Social climber bullies” theory that these bullies are upper social class students
who are overlooked because they are leaders in the school and viewed favorably
by administrators, teachers and counselors (Willard 2006).
The District Attorney for Northwestern Mass., Elizabeth Scheibel, that the
school officials had known about the bullying which included the indictment of
nine students involved in a three month campaign where their “goal was to
humiliate” Phoebe Prince. Some of the charges included: civil rights violation by
bodily injury, criminal harassment, assault by a dangerous weapon, statutory rape,
disturbing a school assembly, and stalking. Incidents of bullying included verbal
threats, physical violence of pushing, spitting and throwing a bottle or can at her.
Scheibel stated in a public announcement that the “conduct far exceeded the limits
of normal teenage relationship related quarrels, and….it was known to faculty and
students.”
According to suicide studies found that “75% of all completed suicides did
things in the few weeks or months prior to their deaths to indicate to others that
they were in deep despair.” (www.ryanpatrickhalligan.org). There are many myths
surrounding suicide, that those who talk about it just want attention, or if someone
wanted to die, there is nothing you can do to stop them.
In a Connecticut case, Maryann Measles a 13 year-old middle school girl
from the town of New Milford, was murdered on October 19, 1997 by eight of her
27
friends; five males and three females, who kidnapped, raped, and strangled to
death before being dumping her nude body in the Housatonic River. “The
affidavits say Maryann had sex with all of the accused men in the summer of
1997, and was killed when they learned she had gone to local police and filed a
sexual assault complaint against one of them and was in the midst of filing a
complaint against another. At the same time, women in the group had grown
jealous and angry and helped arrange the killing, according to at least some of the
accounts.” (Hartford Courant, Nov. 2002).
One of the men charged stated: “We wanted to scare her,” Rajcok told
the court. “It was a schoolyard fight between a couple of girls that ended like
this.... I was angry with her and I wanted her silenced, but not like that.” (The
Register Citizen, Feb. 2009).
28
Lifelong Affect
Bullying in any form has long lasting effects on its victims. Many will
suffer the psychological and emotional damage into their adult and parenting
years. On psychologist and author, Elizabeth Bennett considers herself an “Adult
Survivor of Peer Abuse”, her experience from being bullied, or Peer Abuse, as she
refers to it, has altered her life. According to Bennett, she was “different”… “I
cried a lot, was sensitive, silly and was a quiet child” In grade school, one girl
was a bully, and Bennett wondered why “others girls continued to "worship" her
and always place her on a pedestal, she was so mean and bitchy.” Her parents
began to think she was the one not trying to make friends and that she just needed
to toughen up and deal with it. The years of bullying at school only continued
and worsened:
“It became a daily ritual of being slammed into lockers, pushed around, had spitballs in my hair, called all kinds of names and on my first date that year, I was raped. Also, when I was 12, all of this triggered my first bout with what was to be clinical depression. My parents were furious because my self esteem was so low and my grades were terrible…I wanted to die and considered it at the age of 12.” (Bennett)
By the 9th grade she was using alcohol and smoking cigarettes as an
escape. Her grades suffered and her self-esteem was non-existent. The years of
being bullied lead to her dating men who were both physically and verbally
abusive. It wasn’t until after college that she sought treatment for her years or
29
peer abuse and was diagnosed with bipolar disorder, that she began therapy and
medication that helped her to move past her years of being bullied.
“Victims of traditional bullying say it has affected them to the point where
they have attempted suicide, run away, refused to go to school, or been
chronically ill.”(Hinduja & Patchin). The Cyberbullying Research Center did a
study on 3,000 students grades 6-8 who were victims of bullying, the results show
that both male and females felt mostly “angry” and “frustrated,” followed by
feeling “sad” and then “embarrassed.” Additionally, almost half of the males
studied said they felt “scared,” compared to only about 25 percent of females
feeling the same. (Hinduja & Patchin, 2008).
It would appear that bullying whether it is verbal, physical or written has
negative long term effects on children well into their adulthood. It carries over
into work bullying, or better recognized as harassment or discrimination. Below
are some blog entries from the website (www.cyberbullyalert.com):
(The blogs have been edited for content and brevity)
hazeleyes Says: February 2nd, 2010 at 9:13 am
“I was also cyber bullied by a girl that had a serious grudge against me and my boyfriend at the time. . .The message damaged my confidence and I never could let it go. When I reported it to my principal he said there was “nothing he could do” because it was outside of school….”
soccerghurl808 Says: March 2nd, 2010 at 2:23 pm
“…I am in eighth grade … My BEST FRIEND has been cyberbullying me for a month now and it just won’t go away! All you people say just tell a teacher, but that made it worse… I have had thoughts of suicide… I have not
30
wanted to go to school though!… These memories will torture me for the rest of my life and they will NEVER go away…”
Sydney Says: March 14th, 2010 at 7:09 pm
“I’ve been a victim of bullying all of my life, I’ve tried to put an end to my life a few times now because of it, … I do believe that I have developed an unhealthy view on life because of what people have done to me, but I can’t help but feel that way.”
Gender does not seem to make a difference with regard to cyberbullying.
Both male and females will bullying via the social networks (Facebook,
MySpace, Formspring.me, Youtube, etc) to harass, embarrass and intimidate their
targets. This does differ from bullying in person because there is a sense of being
anonymous and ‘hiding’ behind a screen name or persona.
31
The Latest Social Website
FormSpring.me is a more recent website created for people to be able to
ask each other questions and answer them either anonymously or by allowing
your name or screen name to be posted. The premise is that users can make
comments, posts, or ask questions without any censorship. That only allows for
bullies to be able to harass anonymously and post whatever they want. A recent
story from West Islip, New York reported the suicide of 17-year-old Alexis
Pilkington as a victim of being cyberbullied on FormSpring.com.
“The site (Formspring.me) appears to foster the open sharing of hateful,
profanity- and obscenity-laced statements – against the page owner, against peers
(ostensibly from school), and against others who have asked questions. Some
even include clear encouragements for others to kill themselves and thereby make
the world a better place. These statements circulate in a whirlwind of middle-
school and high-school drama that kids can easily get swept up in – to a point
where it consumes their life.”(www.cyberbullying.us).
32
Responsibility Beyond the Playground
Schools as well as parents need to be involved in the monitoring of
cyberbullying. Although most school officials feel that they have no control over
what is done outside of school grounds, the problem becomes theirs when it
extends into the school, whether it involves school functions or socially. In a
study on cyberbullying, it was reported that 60% of victims of school-based
cyberbullying retaliated against their aggressor(s) at school, 12 percent were
online, and 28 percent reported both school and online. (Juvonen & Gross, 2008).
“Cyberspace is not a separate risky environment…it is a forum that
extends the school grounds.” (Juvonen & Gross, 2008). Where does the school’s
responsibility end when it comes to bullying, whether online or on the
playground? This seems to be the controversy.
Brookfield’s Vice Principle, Susan Griffin, stated that they had no
authority over what happens outside of the school, unless it was to carry over into
the school grounds. Griffin further stated that due to privacy laws, they were
unable to make the terms of discipline public, or discuss details of any school
incidents as it pertained to each student, only to state that it would involve a
suspension from one to ten days.
“The “vast majority of electronic aggression appears to be experienced and perpetrated away from school grounds,” but carries real and serious consequences for children at school,
33
including higher incidences of in-school discipline, truancy, emotional distress, and feeling unsafe at school.” (Camassar)
When asked if there was any type of follow up to the student who bullied,
such as mandatory in-school counseling or a school-based program as to helping
the bully, she said they were not required to do so. It would appear that without
rehabilitation for the perpetrator, the likelihood of the student repeating his/her
behavior will only continue.
Education and uniform training of school administrators is essential in the
prevention and intervention of bullying, as well as cyberbullying. Too often,
bullying is “common knowledge” and teachers and faculty are not given the
proper training, skills or programs available to address it. During a recent visit to
local schools, and using random inquiry, several middle school and high school
students were asked if they knew anyone at their school who was bullied. They
all answered yes, and they knew the student’s name, and who was doing the
bullying. This can only lead one to believe that schools are very much aware of
the extent of bullying in their schools.
All schools have student handbooks that are to be reviewed and read by
both parents and students. The following are examples of middle and high school
student handbooks, and bullying.
34
Student Handbooks:
Whisconier Middle School Brookfield, CT 06804
Grades 5-8
“Bullying of a student by another student is prohibited. “Bullying” means any overt acts by a student of a group of students directed against another student with the intent to ridicule, humiliate or intimidate the other student while on school grounds or at a school-sponsored activity which acts are repeated against the same student over time. Such behavior will result in disciplinary steps as per BOE policy 5131.911.” (WMS Student Handbook 2009-2010)
Basically, the Board Of Education has required all Connecticut schools to
implement a program that will define bullying, require school staff to investigate,
report, and address all instances of bullying through a definitive prevention and
intervention program which includes disciplinary action.
Some argue that the policy and Connecticut statutes regarding bullying are
too vague. For example, there is no mention of bullying via the internet, texting,
and any social websites that have become an all too common forum for children
and teens. Questions that need to be addressed are: At what point does the
cyberbullying interfere with school; and if it happens off school property, what
legal obligations does the school have to intervene.
In comparing the student handbooks between Whisconier Middle School
and Brookfield High School, the policy on bullying was comparatively ‘lean’, not
as descriptive. It maybe because most of the children would have been exposed
35
to the policy and rules against bullying in their four years at middle school, where
bullying appears to be most prevalent, as compared to high school-aged students.
According to Deane Renda, principle of WMS in Brookfield, he says “that
bullying is common in all middle schools with 99% of it happening during
unstructured times; hallways, bus, cafeteria etc., rarely in front of school staff.”
In a most recent incident, a student was verbally bullying another student
repeatedly and warranted a two-day suspension. There was a meeting which
involved the parents.
According to Renda, the middle school addresses the students regarding
bullying via discipline assemblies. “This involves the school counselors
providing lessons that address bullying, cyberbulling, etc. Our health teachers
have lessons on this topic also.” Local Brookfield police officer, Gary Gramling,
volunteer Kelly Mullins from the Women’s Center of Greater Danbury speak to
students, as well as a Connecticut State Police officer specifically addresses
cyberbullying, said Renda. “The biggest problem students deal with is the
internet and cyberbullying because (students) say things they wouldn’t in person,”
said Renda.
Rebeca Delgado, has been a school counselor for 8 years, currently
working Brookfield High School, has seen an increase in internet bullying. When
bullying occurs in the school it is primarily handled through the assistant
principle. According to Delgado, she works with students being victimized
36
talking it through with them and following up via reporting to school
administrators and families when appropriate. “I have also worked with the
bullies, again not on the disciplinary end, but handling the conversations about
why they are behaving in the way they are.”
Bullying leads to unsafe schools and “hostile school environment” where
consequences of bullying have been connected to well known school shootings in
recent years. (Quiroz). When schools do not take a proactive role, they in turn are
condoning the behavior and setting the standard of acceptance, very much like the
Bystander. Schools need to implement a program that promotes the standards of
“civility.” (Quiroz).
37
Conclusion
Middle school-aged children are experiencing the greatest impact of
cyberbullying because as adolescents they are “developing a social understanding
which evolves from thinking about them self, to thinking of others.” (Donohoe,
2005). They are trying to discover who they are and do not necessarily concern
themselves with anything beyond their ‘own world.’ Many children who engage
in electronic harassment are not aware of the repercussions of their hurtful
actions. Parents and adults have an obligation to teach children respect and
socially acceptable behavior to avoid potential cyberbullying.
Ultimately, the entire responsibility cannot fall upon the schools, but rather
it is imperative that parents, as well as teachers and school administrators,
understand the full aspects and ramifications of the unsupervised use of the
internet and technologies when it concerns children. Children learn morals and
ethics from their parents and other family members early on in life and that needs
to carry-over into their school and social life.
Today’s parents lead very busy lives where generally both parents are
working, leaving little time to keep track of their children’s online activities. The
reality is that as of September 2008 more than 80% of Americans had a computer
in their homes, and of those, almost 92% have internet access according to The
Nielson Company, a marketing research company.
38
Most children admit that there is little to no parental supervision as to what
they are doing, or where they are going, on the internet, or with whom they are
texting on their cell phones. Technology is advancing our ability to communicate
and explore vast opportunities and endless places on the internet: But with that
comes the prospect for abuse, deceit and corruption.
When a teenager is obtaining a driver’s license to operate a car, they need
to be educated on how to operate the vehicle (current technology), learn the rules
of the road (laws and rules of acceptable internet use), and be able to interpret the
road signs (navigate safely on the Web). Just as an unlicensed teen would not be
allowed to drive a car anywhere, with anyone or at anytime; neither should they
be allowed to use their computer or cell phone in the same irresponsible manner.
Cyberbullying is like a fire that if left unattended will burn wildly out of
control. Until there is a way to legally regulate or police the internet it is the
ultimate responsibility of parents, schools and adults in our community to educate
and supervise our children when it involves the internet.
39
Works Cited
Abbott, Cindy. Personal interview. 16 Apr. 2010.
Bazelon, Emily. “How Should Facebook and MySpace Handle Cyberbullying?” Slate.
Washington Post.Newsweek Interactive Co. LLC, 25 Mar. 2010. Web. 2 Apr. 2010.
<http://www.slate.com/.aspx?action=print&id=2248764>.
“’Bullies in cyberspace: Internet and cell phone taunting is a growing problem for kids.” WR
News, Weekly Reader Corp. 2008 12 Dec. 2008, Senior Edition (including Science Spin).
ed.: n. pag. Print.
Camassar, Scott D. “Connecticut Law and Cyber Bullying: More Is Needed.” Communications
& Media Law Personal Injury 11 Jan. 2009: n. pag. Web. 30 Mar. 2010.
<http://www.jdsupra.com>.
Canning, Andrea, Russell Goldman, and Kate McCarthy. “Some Parents Outraged No School
Officials Charged in Teen Cyberbullying Case.” Goodmorningamerica.com. ABC News
Internet Ventures. , 30 Mar. 2010. Web. 5 Apr. 2010. <http://abcnews.go.com//>.
“Children Who Bully Also Have Problems With Other Relationships.” ScienceDaily. Science
Daily LLC, 26 Mar. 2008. Web. 13 Apr. 2010. <http://www.sciencedaily.com////.htm>.
“Connecticut’s Bullying Prevention Law & Positive School Climate.” The Connecticut
Commission on Children. 2010 Connecticut General Assembly, Apr. 2010. Web. 2 May
2010. <http://www.cga.ct.gov//.htm>.
“Criminal Liability for internet culprits: The need for updated state laws covering th full
spectrum of cyber victimization.” Washington University Law Review 87: 407-436. Print.
Demaray, Michelle K., and Christina F. Brown. “Cyberbullying Research.” National Association
of School Psychologists 38.4 (2009): 19-24. Print.
44
Federal News Service 2009. “Hearing of The Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security
Subcommittee of The House Judiciary Committee Subject: Cyberbullying and Other
Online Safety Issues for Children; H.R. 1966, “Megan Meier Cyberbullying Prevention
Act”; et al.” Galegroup.com . Congressional Hearing Transcript Database, n.d. Web. 30
Sept. 2009.
Fry, Ethan. “Brookfield parents warned of ‘cyber-bullying.’” The Danbury News-Times 14 Mar.
2010: n. pag. Print.
“Gender Bullying.” College of Saint Mary . College of Saint Mary , 5 Dec. 2005. Web. 2 Apr.
2010. <http://education.csm.edu////.htm>.
Gutierrez-Folch, Anita. “Ninth-Grader Arrested as Missouri Cracks Down on Cyberbullying.”
findingDulcinea . Dulcinea Media, Inc., 17 Oct. 2010. Web. 14 Apr. 2010.
Halligan, John. “Ryan’s Story In memory of Ryan Patrick Haligan 1989-2003.”
www.ryanpatrickhalligan.org. Ryan’s Story Presentaition, LLC, n.d. Web. 27 Feb. 2010.
<www.ryanpatrickhalligan.org>.
Hinduja, S., and J. W. Patchin. “Cyberbuylling: An Exploratory Analysis of Factors Related to
Offending and Victimization.” Deviant Behavior 29.2 (2008): 129-156. Print.
Hinduja, S, and J W Patchin. “Cyberbuylling: Intervention and Prevention Strategies.” Journal
of Adolescence 31.1 (2008): 125-146. Print.
Hinduja, S., and J. W. Patchin. “Trends in Online Social Networking: Adolescent use of
MySpace over Time.” Cyberbullying.us. Cyberbullying Research Center, 2008. Web. 14
Apr. 2010. <http://www.cyberbullying.us>.
Juvonen, Jaana, and Elisheva F. Gross. “Extending the School Grounds?-Bullying Experiences
in Cyberspace.” Journal of School Health 78.9 (2008): n. pag. Print.
Kennedy, Tracy. “More jail time for driver in Maryann Measles murder case.”
www.registercitizen.com. The Register Citizen, 6 Feb. 2009. Web. 18 Apr. 2010.
45
Kowalski, Robin M. “Cyberbullying - Recognizing and Treating Victim and Aggressor.”
Psychiatric Times. UBM Medica LLC, 1 Oct. 2008. Web. 29 Apr. 2010.
<http://www.psychiatrictimes.com////>.
Kowalski, Robin M., and Susan P. Limber. “Electronic Bullying Among Middle School
Students.” Journal of Adolescent Health 41 (2007): S22-S-30. Web. 8 May 2010.
<http://www.wct-
law.com///%20Bullying%20Among%20Middle%20School%20Students.pdf>.
Leavenworth, Jesse, and Don Stacom. “Measles Suspect Denies Role: from Prision, Hallas
Contradicts Earlier Statements About Whereabouts.” Hartford Courant 9 Nov. 2002: n.
pag. Print.
The Nemours Foundation. “Cyberbullying.” Kidshealth.org. The Nemours Foundation, Dec.
2008. Web. 8 Mar. 2010. <http://kidshealth.org>.
The Nielson Company. “Home Internet Access in US: Still Room for Growth.” Marketing
Charts . Watershed Publishing, Fall 2008. Web. 9 May 2010.
<http://www.marketingcharts.com//internet-access-in-us-still-room-for-growth-
8280/internet-access-household-income-february-2009jpg/>.
Quiroz, Hilda Clarice, June Lane Arnette, and Ronald D. Stephens. “Bullying In Schools:
Fighting the Bully Battle, Bullying Fact Sheet Series.” National School Safety Center.
National School Safety Center, 2006. Web. 27 Mar. 2010. <http://www.schoolsafety.us>.
Renda, Deane. E-mail and telephone interview. 29 Mar. 2010.
“Research.” Cyberbullying Research Center. Cyberbullying Research Center, Feb. 2010. Web. 5
May 2010. <http://www.cyberbullying.us/.php>.
Reynolds, Matthew, Corinne Ferdon, and Marci Hertz. “Electronic Aggression.” Journal of
Adolescent Health. Dec. 2007. Pdf file.
Rigby, Ken. “Bullying.” Bullying in Schools and what to do about it. Dr.Ken Rigby, Mar. 2007.
Web. 14 Mar. 2010. <http://www.kenrigby.net>.
46
Stelter, Brian. “Guilty Verdict in Cyberbullying Case Provokes Many Questions Over Online
Identity.” The New York Times. The New York Times Company, 27 Nov. 2008. Web. 8
May 2010. <http://www.nytimes.com>.
“Stories of Cyberbullying.” Cyberbully Alert. Vanden Corporation, Oct. 2008. Web. 3 Apr.
2010. <http://www.cyberbullyalert.com////of-cyber-bullying/>.
Walsh, Nate. “Details emerge in death of South Hadley girl bullied to death.” Abc Fox 6 News
www.wggb.com. N.p., 31 Mar. 2010. Web. 5 Apr. 2010. <http://www.wggb.com/>.
“Whisconier Middle School Student Handbook.” Brookfield Public Schools. Brookfield Public
Schools, Fall 2010. Web. 19 Mar. 2010.
<http://www.brookfield.k12.ct.us///_Word_Student_Handbook_2008_2009Gr7_8.pdf>.
“Who Cyberbullies?” Prevent Cyberbulling and Internet Harassment. Internet solutions for
Kids, Inc., n.d. Web. 4 Apr. 2010. <http://www.cyberbully411.com>.
Willard, Nancy E. “Cyberbullying and Cyberthreats: Responding to the Challenge of Online
Social Agression, Threats, and Distress.” researchpress.com. Research Press Publishers,
n.d. Web. 30 Apr. 2010. <http://www.researchpress.com>.
47