Examples of Poor Power Point Practice

The Practitioners’ Guide to HEA

Chapter 5: Translating Outcomes into Action, Annex D

Juxtaposing Poverty & Aid Traps

Poverty Traps in S. Africa Look at changes over time

in asset bundles measured in Poverty Line Units (PLUs)

Key findings:– Divergent dynamics– Repelling ‘Micawber

Threshold’ at ~2 PLUs– Poverty trap equilibrium at

0.9 PLUs Shocks & Productive

Safety Net at the Micawber Threshold

0 1 2 31993 Asset Index, (Poverty Line Units)

0

1

2

3

1998 A

sset In

dex,

(P

ove

rty

Lin

e U

nits

)

Poverty Trap

Expected Asset Dynamics95% Confidence Bands

Micawber Threshold

Source: Adato, M., M.R. Carter and J. May (2006), “Exploring Poverty Traps and Social Exclusion in South Africa Using Qualitative and Quantitative Data”, J of Development Studies, 42 (2): 226-247.

The labels on this graphic The labels on this graphic are impossible to readare impossible to read

The labels on this graphic The labels on this graphic are impossible to readare impossible to read

Civil InsecurityIDPs

AWD Case Fatality Rate (%) Unacceptable Levels (>2%) Combined with Concentrated Displacement (May 3, 2007)

• Galgadud, Dhuusamareeb (3.4%)

• Hiran, Belet Weyne (3.6%)

• Shabelle, Marka (3.4%,) Afgoye (5.3%), Brava (2.6%)

Loss of Livelihoods, Income & Assets Combined with Sharp Food Price Increases (between mid-March & end April)

Import Commodities Local Cereal

• Central 11-25% no change

• M. Shabelle 25-50% 9%• L. Shabelle 15-60% 15-40% • Hiran 20-25% no change

• Bay 25-60% 40-160%

There is too There is too much information much information

on this pageon this page

There is too There is too much information much information

on this pageon this page

The title font The title font is too smallis too small

Too many Too many ‘messages’‘messages’

The title font The title font is too smallis too small

Too many Too many ‘messages’‘messages’

These are talking points These are talking points for the presenter, not for the presenter, not

bullet points for a slidebullet points for a slide

These are talking points These are talking points for the presenter, not for the presenter, not

bullet points for a slidebullet points for a slide

District

( * Regional capital ) Feb 1- May 4 % of Total Pop. % of Urban Pop. Rice,Wheat & Sugar Maize R.Sorghum Rice,Wheat & Sugar Maize R.Sorghum

Walgooyi Gabeed Hargeysa * 4,848 0.9 1.1 0 to 7%* no change* 6% increase* 9% decr to 47% increase 6% increase 6% increase

Togdheer Burco * 121 0.0 0.1 no change* no change* no change* no change no change no change

Bari Bossaso * 2,355 1.4 2.2 no change* no change* no change* 0% to 12 decrease no change 14% decrease

Gaalkacyo * 10,459 7.6 19.1 6 to 14%* no change* no change* 33 to 44% increase 50% decrease no change

Galdogob 18 0.0 0.3

Hobyo 13,280 19.7 103.7

Jariiban 34 0.1 0.5

Xarardheere 16,818 25.7 125.6 0 to 10% no change no change* 11% to 20% no change no change

Dhuusamarreeb * 42,600 46.7 253.3 3.42 13 to 25%* no change* no change* 13% to 25% no change no change

Cabudwaaq 6,600 16.1 78.5 17% decrease to no change*no change* no change*

Cadaado 22,635 49.6 242.7

Ceel Buur 23,292 29.4 181.7

Ceel Dheer 13,842 19.0 119.3 no change* no change* no change* 20% to 25% increase N/A in april no change

Belet Weyne * 30,474 21.1 98.7 3.62 11 to 43%* 8% decrease * NA 0 to 26% increase no change NA

Bulo Burto 5,880 6.6 33.0 7.32

Jalalaqsi 7,327 15.7 71.3 0.75

Jowhar * 15,520 7.1 42.1 1.66 25 to 38% increase 3% increase 11% decrease 25 to 46%% 9% increase 12% decrease

Adan Yabaal 4,800 7.6 66.7 0 to 10%* NA* no change* 0 to 25%* NA no change

Balcad 43,832 36.4 156.0

Cadale 3,600 7.7 33.3

Banadir Mogadishu 487 0.1 0.1 1.52 50 to 67%* no change* no change*

Marka * 21,998 11.4 34.4 3.43 25 to 38% increase 13% increase 20% increase 13 to 54% 13% increase 20 % increase

Afgooye 42,927 31.8 198.7 5.27 13 to 38% 14% increase 14% increase 13 to 50% 29% increase 14% increase

Baraawe 15,900 27.6 103.2 2.61

Kurtunwaarey 372 0.7 5.0 3.88

Qoryooley 2,516 1.9 11.0 9.566% decrease to 23%

increase*25%increase* no change* 18% to 69%increase 41 %increase 50% increase

Sablaale 0 0.0 0.0 7.48

Wanla Weyn 388 0.2 1.8 10.00

Aw Dheegle 0.0 0.0 9.39

Baydhaba * 18,778 8.2 31.8 3.19 38 to 43 % 67% increase no change 25% to 57% incr. 288% increase 160% increase

Buur Hakaba 4,560 3.6 18.2

Diinsoor 2,100 2.8 17.3

Qansax Dheere 2,400 2.4 14.3 0 to 14%* 44% increase* no change* 33% to 57% increase 100% increase 40% increase

Xudur * 500 0.5 2.6

Ceel Barde 300 1.0 5.6

Tayeeglow 400 0.5 2.5

Waajid 600 0.9 4.2 6.18

Baardheere 3,052 2.9 11.9 2.86 0 to 11% * 17%decrease* 40% decrease* 22% to 57% increase 67% increase 34% decrease

Belet Xaawo 1,840 3.3 13.5 no change* 25% decrease* no change*

Luuq 130 0.2 0.9 no change* no change* no change* no change* 50% increase no change

Jilib 350 0.3 1.2

Kismaayo * 3,485 2.1 3.9 4.61 25% to 50% no change no change

Afmadow 2,012 3.9 28.3 0 to 14%* no change* NA 25% to 29% 50% increase NA

Jamaame 0 0.0 0.0 25.49

393,430 5.2 13.6

Increase in Prices from Mid March to End AprilDisplaced Populations Case Fatality Rate(%)

Increase in Prices from Mid March to 1st week April

Juba Dhexe

Gedo

Bakool

Bay

Mudug

Shabelle Hoose

Shabelle dhexe

Hiran

Galgadud

Footnotes:Baidoa & Qansahdhere prices have increased dramatically due to a)high demand for sorghum from neighbouring regions.b)Increased supply of cash both Dollars and Somali shillings.C)They are the only cereal markets currently accessible for traders to purchase due to rains blocking roads to other markets.

Note that sorghum prices in all markets including Baidoa are still lower than the long term average (98-07).April '07 maize prices in Lower & Middle Shabelle are still lower than the April prices since 2004.

Source: 2005 Population data - UNDP Somalia Displaced Populations - UNHCR 4 May 2007AWD cases,Deaths & CFR - WHO 1 jan - 3 May 2007Market Prices - FSAU

This table is not This table is not possible to readpossible to readThis table is not This table is not possible to readpossible to read

There is too much There is too much information on this slide information on this slide – better as a hand out– better as a hand out

There is too much There is too much information on this slide information on this slide – better as a hand out– better as a hand out

The National Solidarity Programme

• Rural Reconstruction and Development project Implemented by MRRD • 4 years from 2003 to 2007• Funding and Assistance from World Bank and International Donors• Covering all Provinces of Afghanistan • 3 phases each year, covering averagely 16 villages in each ”batch”

1st year: 5506 CDCs elected, and ongoing facilitation in 5917 Villages • Planned target, end of the project by 2007: 20.000 villages in the whole country

• Main Objectives:• Reducing Poverty through Reconstruction and Development with Equal and

Inclusive Participation – Gender, Ethnicity, Wealth and Social Status• Improved Local Governance with Empowerment of the People through Inclusive

Participation in Reconstruction and Development

– Building Institutions on Local Level and Linkage with the Sub-Government Structures – Learning Democracy through Participatory Co-operation and Shared Responsibility in the

Planning of Community Development

The font size on this slide is too The font size on this slide is too small – there is too much textsmall – there is too much text

The font size on this slide is too The font size on this slide is too small – there is too much textsmall – there is too much text

Service Delivery

Local Government seeks to provide much-needed

services and peace dividends to its people. In order to

meet this goal, it needs to:• Provide its communities with a secure environment• Improve its own capacity to jointly identify, plan,

prioritize, implement and monitor/evaluate humanitarian, recovery and development projects with its communities and partners

• Coordinate existing UN and NGO activities (“service delivery”)

• Reduce its dependency on external support through a gradual process of fund raising, capacity building, absorption & direct execution of projects

The text The text color choice color choice is poor – not is poor – not

enough enough contrast with contrast with background background

making it making it hard to readhard to read

The text The text color choice color choice is poor – not is poor – not

enough enough contrast with contrast with background background

making it making it hard to readhard to read