evidence based observation lead evaluator training part 2 – session 1 august 24 th , 2012

63
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 – Session 1 August 24 th , 2012 Welcome Back!

Upload: tracen

Post on 24-Feb-2016

33 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 – Session 1 August 24 th , 2012 Welcome Back!. “ Homeplay ”. Practice collecting evidence of “engaged learners.” (if you were still observing instruction) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

1

Evidence Based Observation

Lead Evaluator TrainingPart 2 – Session 1August 24th, 2012Welcome Back!

Page 2: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

“Homeplay” Practice collecting evidence of “engaged

learners.” (if you were still observing instruction)

Examine an observation that you have completed, looking for evidence and bias/opinion.

Identify the presence or absence of “engaged learners” in your current observation tool.

Page 3: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

Your goals and questions…

Page 4: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

1. What would be evidence of “engaged learning?”

2. What are the attributes of engaged learning?

3. How many students should be engaged?

Questions everyone in the room should be able to answer about engaged learners…

Page 5: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

1. I want to incorporate what I have learned about engagement into my observations.

2. Encourage teachers to refocus on engaging all learners.

3. Conduct walkthroughs looking for engaged students.

4. Help teachers design lessons to maximize student engagement.

5. Be more consistent with the identification of engaged learning.

Some of your goals…

Page 6: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

Explain the difference between current practice and evidence based observation

Identify and define criteria for effective instruction around which evidence collection will be focused

Describe strategies that a district could employ to increase the quality of evaluations and the agreement of evaluators.

Today’s Outcomes:

Page 7: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

Continuum of Engagement

TEACHER ONLY

SIMULTANEOUS ACTIVE

PARTICIPATION

OPTIONAL STUDENT

PARTICIPATION

OCCASIONAL TEACHER DIRECTED

PARTICIPATION

Page 8: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

Ready for more practice?

Page 9: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

4th grade Science Lesson

Students will be able to: identify the components of a series circuit

connectioncompare the components of a series circuit with the

components of a circuit connection

Page 10: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

Evidence Collected:

T “Last week, can you tell me what you were building?” “What did we build with a bulb? What did we call it when we had some components?” S “a circuit.”

T “What were the components in a circuit that you built?” “Eric?”

Page 11: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

Evidence Collected:

T “What do you think these poles represent?” Ss “North and South”.

T “Here’s the challenge for today, can you get two bulbs to light at the same time?” All students took out a graphic organizer.

Students were seated in quads. The “getters” collected materials for each group.

All students were building circuits to test their predictions.

Page 12: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

What does it mean when we say “Teach to an

Outcome”?

Page 13: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

What does your piece of a particular rubric say about “teaching to an outcome?”

Be ready to share.

Rubrics…..

Page 14: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

Pink: Danielson’s Framework for Teaching (ASCD)

Orange: Danielson (2011 Revised Edition)

Tan: Marshall’s Teacher Evaluation Rubric

Green: Marzano’s Causal Teacher Evaluation

Blue: NYSTCE Framework for the Observation of Effective Teaching (Pearson)

White: NYSUT’s Teacher Practice Rubric

Purple: Thoughtful Classroom Teacher Effectiveness (Silver Strong & Associates)

Rubric Work…Teach to an Outcome

Page 15: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

The objective of the lesson is clear to the students (Shift from “What do I want them to do today?” to “What do I want them to learn today?”)

All classroom activities are aligned with the objective

What does it mean when we say “Teach to an Outcome”?

Page 16: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

Time is used efficiently to get to the learning objective

Page 17: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

What? Objectives state what students are expected

to learn in that lesson.

Objectives begin with VERBS that identify the level of thinking required in the lesson.

Learning Objectives

Page 18: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

Why? Instructional objectives narrow what students

focus on in the lesson and help the teacher keep activities, questions and responses to student’s aligned.

Learning Objectives

Page 19: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

Identify and explain the function of each of the organelles in an animal cell.

Use order of operations to solve these two problems.

Describe strategies that a district could employ to increase the quality of evaluations and the agreement of evaluators

Learning Objectives

Page 20: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

Outcomes: Students will be able to: Calculate unit price by dividing the price of the

product by the number of units

Compare unit prices to determine the “best deal”

Explain the mathematical thinking behind what makes it the “best deal”

Video: 6th Grade Math

Page 21: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

Video

Page 22: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

“What is the unit price?” was posted on theinteractive white board.

T “Today we are going to learnabout unit price. What is unit price?”

T“Unit price is how much it costsfor each unit.”

“How do you find unit price?” was displayed on the white board.

Evidence Collected:

Page 23: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

T “Make sure your decimals are in the right place.”

The teacher held up two boxes of cereal—different

size boxes.

T “You aren’t looking for the better deal, you are looking for the better price.”

One student worked on the white board solving 420 divided by 5.

Evidence Collected:

Page 24: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

The Keys to Teach to an Outcome

Page 25: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

Quotations from the teacher Examples/models Descriptions of activities in which the

students are engaged Student quotes

What qualifies as “evidence” for “teach to an outcome”?

Page 26: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

More Practice with TTO

SWBAT identify how a writer narrows their focus while writing

Page 27: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

Defend WHY you called this evidence of TTO:Collection of EvidenceT “Today I want to talk to you about what writers do to narrow their focus.”

T used a visual of a pizza/pizza slices to illustrate “narrowing the focus”.

T “Did I stick to my focus? Is it about my grandmother’s swing and being on that swing—that special time with her?”

T “In a few minutes I’m going to ask you to talk to each other and decide if your story is narrowed or if you need to do some more narrowing.” Ss buddy shared.

Page 28: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

What did you collect? Defend WHY you called this evidence of TTO:

Collection of Evidence

The teacher stated to the class, “Narrowing the focus helps us as writers.” She added “narrowing the focus” to the “How Writers Revise” chart posted in the front of the room.

Page 29: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

“Homeplay”

Examine an observation that you have completed, looking for evidence and bias/opinion

Identify the presence or absence of “teaching to an outcome” in your current observation tool

Page 30: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

The Keys to Teach to an Outcome

Page 31: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

Thank You!See you August 29th*Submitting Evidence*

Feel free to bring computers/electronics

Page 32: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

Evidence Based Observation

Lead Evaluator TrainingAugust 29th, 2012

Part 2 – Welcome Back!

Page 33: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

“Homeplay” (if you have examples, be prepared to share them)1. Practice collecting evidence of “teaching to an

outcome”. Describe what has changed for you as an observer as a result of this workshop.

2. Examine an observation that you have completed, looking for evidence and bias/opinion. Describe what you notice about the types of evidence you are collecting.

3. Identify the presence or absence of “teaching to an outcome” in your current observation tool

Page 34: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

Your goals and “keys”…

Page 35: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

Keys to Teaching to an Outcome Make the learning objective clear to the

students. Base the lesson on what it is you want the

kids to learn, not do. Focus on the “bulls eye”/keep focused on

the target. All instruction is focused on the objective of

the lesson.

Page 36: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

Practice observing specifically to see if the teacher sets a clear outcome and focuses on it throughout the lesson.

Collect evidence to discuss “teach to an outcome” with the teacher. (Did the activities directly relate to the “target”?)

Help teachers recognize/classify if the objective/lesson activities are congruent.

Your Goals:

Page 37: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

Identify the key attributes of “effective questioning”

Collect evidence of “effective questioning” Describe multiple ways for collecting evidence of “effective

questioning

Classify evidence of “questions” as Check for understanding Effective questions Objectives Classroom management/procedural

Today’s Outcomes:

Page 38: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012
Page 39: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

What does it look like and sound like when a teacher uses effective

questioning strategies?

Page 40: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

Rubric Language (“Proficient”):NYSUT:Most of teacher’s questions are open in nature and engage students in deeper thinking and further discussion.

Teacher responds to students’ questions/comments.Responses challenge student thinking.

2011 Danielson:While the teacher may use some low-level questions, he/she poses questions to promote student thinking and understanding.

Teacher creates a genuine discussion among students, providing adequate time for students to respond, and stepping aside when appropriate.

Teacher successfully engages most students in the discussion, employing a range of strategies to ensure that most students are heard. Critical Attributes: • Open ended questions• Effective use of wait time

Marzano:Teacher engages student with explicit decision making, problem solving, experimental inquiry or investigation task that requires them to generate and test hypotheses.

Teacher uses wait time.

Page 41: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012
Page 42: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

Criteria for Effective Questioning Congruent (relevant) to the learning Invitation for ALL students to think A range of questions are used to extend thinking

from a base of knowledge to higher order thinking that is more critical and creative

Page 43: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

Continuum of Questioning

High ConsensusYes/No - Fact

Low Consensus

Closed Open

Page 44: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

WAIT TIMEWhat is it?

Why do it?

Page 45: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

Video: 5th Grade MathLesson Goal:

“Have them (the students) have a conceptual idea about division of fractions.”

-Bonnie Bushaw

Page 46: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

“How can I get 1/3 of a muffin? Oh-I saw someone draw a picture. That’ll work. Take a minute to do what you need to do to figure this out.”

“Ok. Who can tell me how many muffins with a third muffin serving? What do we have for a 1/3 muffin serving?” S “72”T “Can you prove it?”S “Yes because if you get 1/3 of a muffin, that’s 3 out of one muffin. 24 X 3 is 72.”

Sample Evidence Collected:

Page 47: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

T “Figure out my 24 muffins and divide them into ¼ muffin servings.”

S “You just add 24 to 72 and get 96.”T “She added 24 to 72, the last answer, is that

ok?”

Sample Evidence Collected:

Page 48: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

What kinds of questions are used for check for understanding?

What kinds of questions are used for effective questions (that lead to the outcome)?

What kinds of questions are used for classroom management/procedural?

Classifying Question Types

Page 49: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

Video: Tammy Mendoza, 6th Grade Science

“When I heard the city was considering pulling out the sewer line, I thought wouldn’t it be fun to build a model of that and have the kids understand erosion and

deposition, but also how it might affect themselves as well as the community.”

Page 50: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

Evidence Sample:

Page 51: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

Evidence Sample:

Page 52: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

Classifying Questions:Are they checking for understanding, effective questions leading to the outcome, or questions that are management/procedural?

What are we going to do today? What’s our goal today? (Effective questions leading to the outcome)

Why is this important to our community? Why is it important that we are taking time to study our creek? Why have I asked you to make models of this? And why is it important to point out where the erosion and deposition is occurring?(Effective questions leading to the outcome)

Page 53: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

Classifying Questions:Are they checking for understanding, effective questions leading to the outcome, or questions that are management/procedural?

Are you talking to each other?(Management/Procedural)

If it were to expand around the corner, what might it effect? What’s around that area?

S: HousesAlso a what?

S: A roadS: and domesticated animals

(Check for Understanding)

Page 54: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

Your Mission: Collect 4-5 pieces of evidence FOR EACH

EFFECTIVE TEACHING CATEGORY. You will be labeling the evidence as “Check for

Understanding,” “Student Engagement,” “Teach to an Outcome” and/or “Effective Questioning.”

Keep in mind that “good evidence” is often quotations or numerical facts having to do with the students or the teacher.

Evidence Collection with Individual Feedback!

Page 55: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

Let’s Review!

Page 56: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

Evidence is observable (overt)

Evidence is of ALL students

Evidence is congruent to the objective

Check for Understanding:

Page 57: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

All students are visibly participating in activities/learning that is relevant to the

objective.

Engaged Learners:

Page 58: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

The objective of the lesson is clear to the students (Shift from “What do I want them to do today?” to “What do I want them to learn today?”)

All classroom activities are aligned with the objective

Teach to an Outcome:

Page 59: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

Congruent (relevant) to the learning

Invitation for ALL students to think

A range of questions are used to extend thinking from a base of knowledge to higher order thinking that is more critical and creative

Effective Questioning:

Page 60: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

T “During today’s lesson, you will identify coins and their values. You will practice calculating the sums of the coins.”(Teaching to an outcome)

T “When would you need to add coins?” (Effective Questioning)

T displayed clusters of coins on the interactive white board. All students wrote the sums of the coins on their individual white boards and showed their work to the teacher when she said, “Show!” (Student Engagement/Checking for Understanding)

Sample:

Page 61: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

Video:

Page 62: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

Email your 4-5 pieces of evidence (labeled) for each area of effective teaching we have focused on to [email protected] and [email protected] by September 10th.

“Homeplay”:

Page 63: Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 –  Session 1 August 24 th , 2012

Thank You!