elements of lead evaluator training

59
Students with Unique Learning Needs Specific Considerations in Evaluating Teachers of English Language Learners and Students with Disabilities Broome-Tioga BOCES March 18 th , 2013

Upload: kirti

Post on 22-Feb-2016

41 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Students with Unique Learning Needs Specific Considerations in Evaluating Teachers of English Language Learners and Students with D isabilities Broome-Tioga BOCES March 18 th , 2013. Elements of Lead Evaluator Training . New York State Teaching Standards and Leadership Standards - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

Students with Unique Learning Needs

Specific Considerations in Evaluating Teachers of

English Language Learners and Students with Disabilities

Broome-Tioga BOCESMarch 18th, 2013

Page 2: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

2

Elements of Lead Evaluator Training

1. New York State Teaching Standards and Leadership Standards2. Evidence-based observation3. Application and use of Student Growth Percentile and VA Growth

Model data4. Application and use of the State-approved teacher or principal rubrics5. Application and use of any assessment tools used to evaluate

teachers and principals6. Application and use of State-approved locally selected measures of

student achievement7. Use of the Statewide Instructional Reporting System8. Scoring methodology used to evaluate teachers and principals9. Specific considerations in evaluating teachers and principals of

ELLs and students with disabilities

Page 3: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

New York June 2011 Graduation Rate

Graduation under Current Requirements Calculated College & Career Ready*

% Graduating % Graduating

All Students 74.0 All Students 34.7

American Indian 59.6 American Indian 16.8

Asian/Pacific Islander 82.4 Asian/Pacific Islander 55.9

Black 58.4 Black 11.5

Hispanic 58.0 Hispanic 14.5

White 85.1 White 48.1

English Language Learners 38.2 English Language Learners 6.5

Students with Disabilities 44.6 Students with Disabilities 4.4

*Students graduating with at least a score of 75 on Regents English and 80 on a Math Regents, which correlates with success in first-year college courses.Source: NYSED Office of Information and Reporting Services

Page 4: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

4

ESL & Special Ed: Similarities• Students with unique learning needs• Shared responsibility among teachers• Federal civil rights legislation• Common Core Standards & Assessments• Testing accommodations available• Service model options

Page 5: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

5

ESL & Special Ed: DifferencesESL Special Ed

No IEP Individualized Education PlanParents cannot opt out Parent must approve

participationSingle classification: LEP Multiple classificationsIdentification & exit based upon standardized test

Identification & exit based upon comprehensive evaluation

Developmental continuum leads to bilingualism

Developmental trajectories differ greatly

Page 6: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

Specific Considerations in Evaluating Teachers of ELLs

6

Adam BauchnerDirector

Page 7: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

7

Agenda for ELLs Section1. Context

a) Which teachers?b) NYS Regulationsc) Service Models

2. Evaluation of Best Practicea) Ask about studentsb) Ask about curriculumc) Ask about instruction

Page 8: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

8

Page 9: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

9

Page 10: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

ObjectivesParticipants will be able to:• Understand NYS regulations regarding

English Language Learners.  • Describe “language objectives” and

“sheltered instruction”.  • Evaluate and develop best instructional

practice for ELLs.

Page 11: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

11

Pre-Assessment: Self-Evaluation

I wonder if this will help with state tests?Do I need to speak other languages?Is this all for those few students?

Page 12: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

12

Which teachers??“ESL Teachers”

• Linguistics & second language acquisition (SLA)

• Cultural components• ESL standards, curriculum

& assessment• Best instructional practice

for ELLsTraining or experience with content areas?

“Teachers of ELLs”• Any teacher with ELLs• Any subject• Any grade level• Generalists &

specialists

Training or experience with ELLs & SLA?

Page 13: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

13

Commissioner’s Regulations CR 154*

• ID Process (CR 117)• Services models• Services minutes• Testing accommodations

*Also the name of the annual report

Page 14: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

14

Commissioner’s Regulations CR 154*

*Also the name of the annual report• Even if there are no ELLs, your district submits a

“zero report”.• Every district has one “Program Coordinator”

responsible for this reporting. – Do you know who is your district’s ESL

program coordinator?

Page 15: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

15

• Check the FAQ

Use the

FAQ.

Page 16: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

16

Service Minutes“Language Allocation Policy”

Page 17: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

17

– 1 unit = 180 minutes per week– 2 units =360 minutes per week– 3 units= 540 minutes per week

• Minutes per week do not need to be exactly the same every day, keeping in mind the needs of the students.

Service Minutes

K-8 9-12Beginner & Intermediate: 2 units = 360 m/week = 72 m/dayAdvanced: 1 unit = 180 m/week = 36 m/day

Beginner: 3 units= 540 m/week = 3 periods/dayIntermediate: 2 units = 2 periods /dayAdvanced: 1 unit = 1 period /day

Page 18: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

18

Testing AccommodationsMandatory on state tests,

local decision on local tests

1. Extended Time2. Best location3. 3rd read on listening sections (ELA &

Regents)4. Bilingual dictionaries or glossaries5. Simultaneous dual language testing6. Translator or interpreter

Page 19: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

Mathematics 2006-2012 Grades 3-8 Combined

Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 465

.9%

72.7

% 80.7

%

86.4

%

61.0

%

63.3

%

64.8

%

Grades 3-8 Math

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

2012: 64.8%

Page 20: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

38.6

%

45.7

%

58.4

%

67.1

%

30.7

%

32.3

%

34.4

%

Grades 3-8

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

2012: 34.4%

Mathematics 2006-2012 Grades 3-8 Combined

Percentage of ELLs Scoring at Levels 3 and 4

Page 21: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

English Language Arts 2006 – 2012Grades 3-8 Combined

Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4

63.4% 68.5%77.4%

53.2% 55.1%52.8%

Grades 3-82006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

2012: 55.1%

Page 22: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

16.2% 18.0%25.1%

36.4%

14.3% 12.6% 11.7%

Grades 3-8

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

2012: 11.7%

English Language Arts 2006 – 2012Grades 3-8 Combined

Percentage of ELLs Scoring at Levels 3 and 4

Page 23: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

23

Service ModelsEnglish as a Second

Language (ESL)1. Push-in2. Pull-out3. Combo4. Content area

support

• No opting out

Bilingual Education

1. Transitional2. Two-Way

• Rule of 20: One building, one grade level, one language

• Parents can opt-out

Page 24: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

Please tell people at your table one new thing you learned

about ESL regs.

Page 25: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

What questions

remain about the ESL regs?

Page 26: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

26

Agenda for ELLs Section1. Context

a) Which teachers?b) NYS Regulationsc) Service Models

2. Evaluation of Best Practicea) Ask about studentsb) Ask about curriculumc) Ask about instruction

Page 27: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

27

Ask about Students

Page 28: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

28

5 Stages of Second Language Acquisition

• Preproduction  • Early Production  • Speech Emergence  • Intermediate Fluency  • Advanced Fluency 

Page 29: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

29

5 Stages of Second Language Acquisition

• Preproduction: 0-6 months • Early Production: 6-12 months • Speech Emergence: 1-3 years• Intermediate Fluency: 3-5 years• Advanced Fluency: 5-7 years

Page 30: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

30

5 Stages of Second Language Acquisition

Affects:• Questioning strategies• Response expectations• Level of independence 

Page 31: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

31

DifferentiationFor

English Language LearnersAmong

English Language Learners

Page 32: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

• Long Term LEP/ELLs (LTL) • Students With Disabilities who are

LEP/ELLs (SWD)• Former LEP/ELLs• New Immigrants• Students with Interrupted Formal

Education (SIFE)

Sub-Groups Of LEP/ELLs

Page 33: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

What other differences do you find among ELLs?

Page 34: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

34

So we need to ask:

“Who are your ELLs? What are their specific needs? How is this lesson tailored to help them?”

Page 35: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

35

Ask about CurriculumDual Objectives

Language Goals

Content Goals

Page 36: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

36

• Usually drawn from state standards for the content area

• Recognized by verbs related to knowledge of the content area:

identify, analyze, rank, construct, graph, divide, solve, visualize, design.

Content Goals

Page 37: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

37

• Address the language needed to engage with the academic content, perform classroom tasks, and achieve the content objectives:

read, write, listen, list, tell, discuss, journal, record, persuade, debate, draft

• Also key vocabulary, language functions, and language learning strategies.

Language Goals

Page 38: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

Content Objectives: Students will be able to

• Explain the effects of smoking on health.

Language Objectives: Students will be able to

• Explain to a partner the effects of smoking.o One consequence of smoking is ___________.o Smoking leads to _____________.o Smoking causes _____________.o Smoking increases the risk of _____________.o Smokers are more likely to ___________ than

nonsmokers.• In the reading, highlight the effects of

smoking.

Page 39: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

Content Objectives: Students will be able to• Explore three decisions about the atomic bomb that were faced by the

U.S. during WWII, take a position on each, and defend their position orallyDecision A: Whether to build an atomic bombDecision B: Whether to drop an atomic bombDecision C: Whether Truman made the right decision

Language Objectives: Students will be able to• Read information in a small group for each decision and reach

consensus on a position by listening and discussing• State their position and orally defend it in a class dialogue• Disagree with prior speakers in a respectful manner• In writing, defend a position on whether or not it was justifiable to use

the bomb on Japan

Page 40: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

What does a teacher need to know in order to identify dual objectives?

Page 41: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

41

So we need to ask:“What are the lesson’s content objectives and language objectives? How did you determine these objectives?”

Page 42: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

42

Factors Affecting Language Learning

1. Motivation2. Reading & Writing Skills in 1st Language3. How different is 1st language from new

language.4. How much English is in the home?5. Age6. Personality & Learning Style7. Peers & Role Models8. Quality of Instruction9. Cultural Background

Page 43: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

43

Ask about Instruction

“Sheltered Instruction”

Definition: An approach to teaching content to English Language Learners in a strategic way so that they both access the subject matter and improve their English.

Page 44: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

44

Eight Components:

1.Lesson Preparation2.Building Background3.Comprehensible Input4.Strategies5.Interaction6.Practice/Application7.Lesson Delivery8.Review/Assessment

Page 45: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

45

Rubric on Handout:

• For use by trained teachers and administrators

• For self-evaluation • For peer observation

Not for summative evaluation.

Page 46: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

46

Best Instructional Practice for ELLs

• Start with what the kids bring:Culture

LanguagePersonal ExperiencesAcademic Experience

Page 47: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

47

Best Instructional Practice for ELLs

• Provide lots of comprehensible input.Speak slowly & clearly

Controlled, simplified vocabulary.Minimize idiom

Use gestures & visuals• Check comprehension frequently

Page 48: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

48

Best Instructional Practice for ELLs

• Teach strategies

• Check comprehension frequently

Page 49: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

49

Best Instructional Practice for ELLs

• Provide lots of opportunity to use English.Students speaking a lotExtra processing time

Affirm communicative abilityCorrect with modeling

• Check comprehension frequently

Page 50: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

50

Best Instructional Practice for ELLs• Practice all four language modalities:

Page 51: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

51

Best Instructional Practice for ELLs

• Keep anxiety low.

Page 52: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

52

So we need to ask:

“How are you sheltering instruction for your ELLs? How do you check comprehension and progress?”

Page 53: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

Application Questions• Which aspects of this presentation tie in

directly with your teacher evaluation rubric?

• What can you do for a teacher who is developing or ineffective in teaching ELLs?

Page 54: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

54

Next Steps• Crosswalk these ideas with your districts

evaluation rubric.• Practice evaluation with videos, norming

levels of rigor.• Contact Network Team or RBERN for

further support.

Page 55: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

RBERN Resources• Website • Resource Library• Contacts for Translators & Interpreters• Email List• Quarterly Administrators Meetings

http://rbern.ocmboces.org/

Page 56: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

• LEP/ELL Program Evaluation Toolkit• Bilingual Glossaries• FAQ• “Art as a Tool for Teachers of ELLs” • “Guide for Parents of Limited English Proficient Students in

New York State” • “Promising Instructional Practices for Secondary English

Language Learners(7-12)” • “Response to Intervention (RtI)” • “Suggested Spanish Literature and Reading Books”• “Technology in the LEP/ELL Classroom”

Resources on OBE-FLS Webpage

http://www.p12.nysed.gov/biling/

Page 57: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

57

Post-Assessment: Self-Evaluation

I wonder if this will help with state tests?Do I need to speak other languages?Is this all for those few students?

[email protected]

Page 58: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

58

Please

complete the

evaluation.

Page 59: Elements of  Lead Evaluator Training

10 Minute Break