evaluations update
DESCRIPTION
Evaluations Update. General Administrators Dr. Glenn Maleyko. February 27, 2014. Timelines Have Changed. All Evaluation Documents must be submitted to HR by May 10 th . This is to comply with board of education policy on layoff and recall. Goal Deadlines Moved up - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Evaluations Update](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070411/568147cd550346895db50ae5/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Evaluations Update
General Administrators Dr. Glenn Maleyko.
February 27, 2014
![Page 2: Evaluations Update](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070411/568147cd550346895db50ae5/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Timelines Have Changed
All Evaluation Documents must be submitted to HR by May 10th. This is to comply with board of education policy on layoff and recall.
Goal Deadlines Moved upGoals for Subsequent Year Should be
discussed and teachers should create them with data from year-end evaluations
A Google Calendar with Evaluation Deadlines was created.
![Page 3: Evaluations Update](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070411/568147cd550346895db50ae5/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Teacher Evaluation Committee
Bill Tucker Mark Palise Jill Chochol Shannon Peterson Andrew Denison Linda Salamey Fatme Faraj Robert Seeterlin Hassane Jaafar Gail Shenkman Julia Maconochie Chris Sipperley Wyatt David Steve Salah
Glenn Maleyko Nicole Chubb
![Page 4: Evaluations Update](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070411/568147cd550346895db50ae5/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Weighted Formula75% will be based on Observation
Protocol and the 5 Standards for Effective Teaching.
This includes observations (formal and
not formal), walkthroughs, other performance measures that are related to the teacher evaluation rubric which includes all 5 standards. Professional Responsibilities are included as one of the standards.
![Page 5: Evaluations Update](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070411/568147cd550346895db50ae5/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
25% Growth Data
5% District growth based on state accountability measures
10% Building Growth based on state or building or district common assessments
10% Classroom Growth based on State Assessments,
![Page 6: Evaluations Update](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070411/568147cd550346895db50ae5/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
![Page 7: Evaluations Update](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070411/568147cd550346895db50ae5/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
10% Building Growth Data Elementary -SRI, DRA & DRA task analysis, Star
Math, 6 plus 1 traits, Building/District Common Assessments, NWEA, MEAP, Art, Music and & PE common Assessments.
Middle School -SRI, DRA, Star Math, 6 plus 1 traits, Building/District Common Assessments, NWEA, MEAP, Art, Music and & PE common Assessments, and Explore.
High School- Explore, Plan, MME, MEAP, SRI, Star Math, Common Assessments, AP exams, and Departmental Assessments.
![Page 8: Evaluations Update](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070411/568147cd550346895db50ae5/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
10% Classroom Growth Data
10% Classroom Growth based on State Assessments, District Common Assessments or Classroom Assessments (ex. Performance or product measures or other formative assessments, pre and post tests are required).
![Page 9: Evaluations Update](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070411/568147cd550346895db50ae5/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Teachscape
We have 59 Administrators that have passed the assessment. 14 started in a new cohort this year.
![Page 10: Evaluations Update](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070411/568147cd550346895db50ae5/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Proposed Legislation in Lansing
House Bill 5223 (MCL 380.1249 & 380.1531j) would revise current evaluation requirements for teachers, and require that school districts meet new requirements for school administrator evaluations, as described in detail in House Bill 5224.
![Page 11: Evaluations Update](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070411/568147cd550346895db50ae5/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Weighted Evaluation Timeline HB 5223
Percentage remain at 25 percent during the next three academic years: 2014-2015; 2015-2016; and 2016-2017.
Then in 2017-2018 school year, the student growth component would be raised to 50 percent.
![Page 12: Evaluations Update](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070411/568147cd550346895db50ae5/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Student Growth
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18
ObservationGrowth Data
![Page 13: Evaluations Update](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070411/568147cd550346895db50ae5/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Multiple Observations
Require that a teacher be observed at least 2 times each year
unless the teacher had received a rating of effective or highly effective on the two most recent evaluations.
One observation must be unannounced
![Page 14: Evaluations Update](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070411/568147cd550346895db50ae5/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Ineffective Teacher DismissalsCurrently, school districts and
charter schools must dismiss teachers rated as ineffective on 3 consecutive year-end evaluations. House Bill 5223 would retain this provision,
![Page 15: Evaluations Update](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070411/568147cd550346895db50ae5/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Continued
but specify that it would apply only if the evaluations were conducted using the same evaluation framework and under the same performance evaluation system.
![Page 16: Evaluations Update](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070411/568147cd550346895db50ae5/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
HB 5223 Student Growth and Assessment Must
Consist of
State student growth and assessment measurement standards,
And a local student growth assessment, and may also include school-level
![Page 17: Evaluations Update](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070411/568147cd550346895db50ae5/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Weighting of Student Growth and Assessment
Data40 Percent Based on State
Assessment if available in Content Area
Other Teachers State Provided Data or Local Assessments
![Page 18: Evaluations Update](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070411/568147cd550346895db50ae5/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
State Deadline
Require the State Student Growth and Assessment Data by March 1, 2014.
![Page 19: Evaluations Update](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070411/568147cd550346895db50ae5/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Practice Component of Evaluations & Teacher Observations
80% of practice component must be based on observations.
![Page 20: Evaluations Update](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070411/568147cd550346895db50ae5/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
4 choices
Charlotte Danielson's Framework for
Teaching; the Marzano Teacher EvaluationThoughtful Classroom Five Dimensions.
![Page 21: Evaluations Update](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070411/568147cd550346895db50ae5/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
HB 5224 Administrator Evaluation 3 Choices
The school advance administrator evaluation instrument developed by
Reeves and McNeill for the Michigan Association ofSchool Administrators;
the Reeves Leadership Performance Rubric;
or the Marzano Framework