evaluation of the east epo - ur...

126
Evaluation of the East EPO Year Two Natalie Lacireno-Paquet Nancy Hurley WestEd Crystal Bish Fortelah LLC June 2017

Upload: others

Post on 13-Jan-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

EvaluationoftheEastEPOYearTwo

NatalieLacireno-PaquetNancyHurleyWestEd

CrystalBishFortelahLLC

June2017

Page 2: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

©2017WestEd.Allrightsreserved.

Lacireno-Paquet,N.,Hurley,N.&Bish,C.E.(2017).EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2.SanFrancisco,WestEd.

WestEdisanonpartisan,nonprofitresearch,development,andserviceagencythatworkswitheducationandothercommunitiesthroughouttheUnitedStatesandabroadtopromoteexcellence,achieveequity,andimprovelearningforchildren,youth,andadults.WestEdhasmorethanadozenofficesnationwide,fromMassachusetts,Vermont,andGeorgiatoIllinois,Arizona,andCalifornia,withheadquartersinSanFrancisco.

Page 3: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–i–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

ContentsChapter1 1

BackgroundandIntroduction 1Methods 3Findings 5OrganizationoftheReport 7

Chapter2 8ProgressofMajorInitiatives 8Leadership 8ProfessionalLearning 14Assessment:CommonFormativeAssessmentsandEmbeddedPerformance

Assessments 26TeacherPractices 28Curriculum 30SupportRoomModel 32FreshmanAcademy 39FamilyGroup 44RestorativePractices 57AlternativePrograms 64FamilyandCommunityEngagement 72

Chapter3 79StudentOutcomes 79

Chapter4 80Conclusions/Recommendations/Reflections 80ReplicationoftheEastEPOmodel 88RecommendationsforOngoingEvaluation 89

Page 4: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–ii–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

AppendixA.ObservationToolsandProtocols 90WestEd–EastUpperandLowerSchool–ClassroomObservationTool 90EastUpperandLowerSchoolCPT ObservationForm 96FamilyGroupObservationprotocol 98

AppendixB.InterviewProtocols 100SchoolandEPOLeaders 100TeacherFocusGroupprotocol 104TeacherLeaderFocusGroupProtocol 105VicePrincipalLevelFocusGroupProtocol 107Counselors/SocialWorkersProtocol 109SchoolSecurityOfficers 110Paraprofessionals 110StudentFocusGroupProtocolUpperSchool 111ParentFocusGroupInterviewprotocol 114PartnerfocusGroupprotocol 115

AppendixC.AssessmentofEastEPOonDTSDEStandardsofPractice116

References 120

LISTOFFIGURES

Figure1.Studentsurveyrespondents,bygrade 7Figure2.Extentteachers/staffbelievedistributiveleadershipmodelexistsatUpperandLowerSchools 10Figure3.Extentteachers/stafffeelempoweredtotakeactionstoimprovethingsatEastUpperandLowerSchools 11Figure4.Extentteachers/staffbelievetheUniversityofRochesterhelpssupporteffectiveteachingatEast 12Figure5.Extentteachers/staffbelievethatUniversityofRochesterinvolvementisanoverallbenefittoEast 13Figure6.Extentteachers/staffbelievethatUniversityofRochesterinvolvementsupportsstudentlearningatEast 13Figure7.Extentteachers/staffbelievethatUniversityofRochesterinvolvementincreasesopportunitiesforstudentsatEast 14

Page 5: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–iii–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

Figure8.Teachers’reportedengagementinregular(atleastweekly)IDCPTmeetings 15Figure9.ExtentteachersreportedusingstudentdatainIDCPT 16Figure10.ExtentteachersbelieveparticipationinIDCPTenhancedteaching 16Figure11.ExtentofteachersengaginginCPTatleastweeklyatendofYear2 17Figure12.Extentofteachers’reporteduseofstudentdataincontentareaCPT 18Figure13.ExtentteachersbelieveparticipationincontentareaCPTsenhancedtheirteaching 18Figure14.Extentteachersbelievetheuseofdailylearningtargetsenhancedtheirteaching 22Figure15.Extentteachersbelievetheuseofdailylearningtargetsenhancedstudentlearning 22Figure16.Extentcharacteristicsoflearningtargetswereobserved,spring2016andspring201723Figure17.ExtentteachersbelieveinformationfromtheCommonFormativeAssessmentsinfluencedtheirteaching 27Figure18.Extentteachersbelievedatafromtheembeddedperformanceassessmentinfluencedtheirteaching 27Figure19.Extenttowhichyouimplementthecurriculumasdesigned 30Figure20.Extentteachersbelievethecurriculumisrigorous 31Figure21.Extentteachersbelievethecurriculumisculturallyrelevanttostudents 32Figure22.ExtentteachersbelieveSupportPeriodhasthepotentialtopositivelyimpactstudentoutcomes 34Figure23.Extentteachersbelievestudentsareabletostrengthenand/oracquireneededskillsthroughSupportperiod 35Figure24.Extentstudentsbelievesupportperiodhelpsthemdobetterintheirclasses. 36Figure25.ExtentteachersbelievetheroleofSupportRoomteachersisclear 38Figure26.ExtentteachersbelievecontentteachersandSupportRoomteacherscollaborateandcoordinateSupportRoomefforts 38Figure27.ExtentofUpperSchoolteachers’beliefsthatFreshmanAcademywillincrease9thgraders’successinUpperSchool,N=102 42Figure28.Extentteachersandstaffbelieveco-carentinghasimprovedFamilyGroup 46Figure29.ExtentstudentsbelieveFamilyGrouphelpsthembuildrelationshipswithteachersandadministrators 48Figure30.ExtentteachersandstaffbelieveFamilyGrouphascontributedtoapositiveclimateandcultureatEast 51Figure31.ExtentteachersandstaffbelieveFamilyGrouphaspositivelyimpactedstudents’developmentofsocialskills 52Figure32.ExtentteachersandstaffbelieveFamilyGrouphaspositivelyimpactedstudentself-advocacyandself-empowerment 52Figure33.ExtentstudentsbelieveFamilyGrouphelpsthemtobuildrelationshipswithotherscholars 54

Page 6: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–iv–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

Figure34.ExtentteachersandstaffbelieveFamilyGrouphaspositivelyimpactedrelationshipbuildingatEast 54Figure35.Extentteachers/staffhaveusedRestorativePracticesintheirclassroomwiththeirstudents 59Figure36.Extentteachers/staffobservedtheuseofRestorativePracticeseffectivelyhelpingtoresolvestudentconflicts 60Figure37.Extentteachers/staffbelieveRestorativePracticescontributetoapositivecultureandclimateatEast 60Figure38.Percentageofstudentswhohaveparticipatedinarestorativecircletoaddressaproblemtheywerehaving 61Figure39.Extentteachers/staffbelievetheyhavereceivedthesupporttheyneededtoeffectivelyimplementRestorativePracticesthisyear 64Figure40.ExtentofadministratorawarenessofQuestalternativeacademicprogram 67Figure41.Extentstudentsbelievetheschoolkeepsparent/guardianinformedaboutwhatisgoingonatschool,suchasevents 75Figure42.Fourdomainsofrapidimprovement 86

LISTOFTABLES

Table1.SummaryofYear2focusgroupsconducted 3Table2.PrimaryroleofrespondentstoTeacher/Staffsurvey 5Table3.YearjoinedEastteam 6Table4.Teacherandstaffperspectivesonparentengagement 74Table5.Teacher/staffperspectivesoncommunitypartners 77Table6.Eastandthefourdomainsofrapidimprovement 87

Page 7: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–1–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

Chapter1BackgroundandIntroductionInthespringof2016,WestEdwascontractedtoconductanexternalevaluationoftheEastEducationalPartnershipOrganization(EPO).ThisreportdocumentstheYear2evaluationactivities,findings,andrecommendations.ThereportfirstprovidesasummaryofYear1findings,givessomebackgroundandcontextonEastHighSchoolandtheEPOPlan,andthendescribestheevaluationmethodsforYear2.ThereportnextpresentsfindingsabouttheprogressmadeinmanyofthemajorinitiativesandprogramsoftheEPOinthe2016–17schoolyear.Foreachinitiative,thereportdescribesanddiscussesfindingsabouttheimplementationinYear2oftheEPO.Followingthesectiononthefindingsforthekeyinitiatives,thereportpresentsquantitativedatatoexaminestudentacademicprogress.ThereportconcludeswithrecommendationsandsuggestedevaluationactivitiesforYear3.

SummaryofYear1TheambitiousundertakingbytheUniversityofRochester(UR)toturnaroundEastHighSchoolwasbyallaccountsanextraordinaryendeavor.Teachersandleadersdescribedthefirstyearofimplementationasa“learningyear,”andthefindingssetforthintheYear1evaluationreportrevealedthatthe“all-in”attitudeatEastUpperandLowerSchoolprevailedtokeeptheinitiativemovingforward.TheworkofYear1oftheEPOfocusedondramaticchangesincurriculum,instructionalpractices,leadershippractices,andstudentexpectationsacademicallyandbehaviorallytostopthedeclineandtosettheconditionsforimprovement.Throughextensivecurricularwork,de-privatizingteacherpractice,supportingchangesininstructionalpractices,andstrengtheningacademicandsocio-emotionalsupportsforstudents,conditionsforimprovementwerefirmlyputinplace.ConsiderablereflectiononthefirstyearfindingsamongteachersandleadersatEastledtoadjustments,revisions,andevenre-inventionsofkeycomponentsinpreparationforYear2.EvaluatorsencouragedEPOleaderstocontinuetofocuson:schoolclimate,enhancedclassroominstructionandhigherexpectations,curriculumdevelopmentandprofessionallearning,parent/familyconnections,communitypartnerships,restorativeculture,increaseddatause,student-centeredlearning,andstudentaccountabilityforoutcomes.SomespecificareasofconcernorareasthatevaluatorssuggestedmightbenefitfromadditionalinvestigationbasedonYear1evaluationfindingsincluded:theeffectivenessofalternativeprograms;ensuringtheneedsofspecialeducationandEnglishNewLanguage(ENL)students;resolvingtheissueof6thgrade;continuingtoimprovefamilyengagement;continuedworkbuildingtrustandtransparencywithallstaff;supporting

Page 8: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–2–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

theprofessionalexpertiseofteacherswhilealsoholdingthemaccountable,andbuildingtheircapacitytoimplementexpectedcurricularandteachingpractices;andobservingimpactsonstudentoutcomes.

StartofYear2ThestartofYear2(2016–17schoolyear)showedaveryvisibleshiftinschoolclimatewithmoreorderlyhallwaysandincreasedstudentwillingnesstoengageinFamilyGroupandotheractivitiesimplementedtoimprovetheirsenseofbelongingatschool.Teachersreturnedwithrenewedcommitmenttoimproveclassroominstruction,andadministratorshavecometogethertoaligntheireffortstosupportimprovedpracticesforteachersandimprovedlearningandsupportsforstudents.Teachersseethatmanyoftheirsuggestionsforchangesinimplementationpractices,forexample,ofsupport,havebeenconsideredandimplementedbyschoolleaders.Year2beganwithoptimismonthepartofschoolleaders,teachers,andstaffwiththehardworkofYear1accomplishedandthegroundworkforimprovementcomplete.ManyareeagertoseeresultsattheendofYear2andhopetheyshowevidenceofimprovement.

EPOPlan

UndertheoriginalEPOplan,theschooladded6thgradeandseparatedtheformerEastHighintotwoschools,EastUpperSchoolforgrades9–12andEastLowerSchoolforgrades6–8.Ateachschool,alongerschooldayconsistingof7.5hourswithstaggeredstartingandendingtimeswasimplemented.Anewleadershipteamwasproposed,whichincludedaSuperintendent,aprincipal,andseveralviceprincipalsforeachoftheschools,aswellasseveralpositionsthatsupportboththeUpperandLowerSchools,includingachiefacademicofficer,orCAO,adirectorofspecialprograms,andaviceprincipalfordataandaccountability.Theuniquestructureoftheleadershipteamisdiscussedinmoredetailbelow.ThesenewstructuralcomponentswerebelievedtobecriticalbytheEPOdesignerstoimplementthekeyprogramsandinitiativestospurdramaticschoolimprovementacademicallyandculturally.Inadditiontoproposedchangesinschoolstructures,theplaninvolvedamajoremphasisoncurriculumandinstruction,includingacompletecurricularoverhaul.

Otherplannedchangesfocusedonstrengtheningsupportsforstudentsacademicallyandbehaviorally,includingplanstoworkwithexternalorganizationstoimplementalternativeprogramstoaddresstheneedsofstudentswhoweresignificantlybehindtheirpeers,atriskofdroppingout,orinneedofre-engagementwithschool.Alongerschooldaypermittedtheadditionofasupportperiodandtoaccommodatearobustsetofcareerandtechnicaleducationaswellaselectiveofferingstoaddressstudentinterests.AttheLowerSchool,doubleperiodsforEnglishwithafocusonliteracyandmathematicswereimplemented.AttheUpperSchool,afreshmanacademymodelwasproposedtosupportnew9thgraders.

Thehiringofadditionalsocialworkersandcounselorswasproposedtosupportstudentsbehaviorally.FamilyGroup,adailyinitiativetoensurethateachstudentisconnectedwithoneormorecaringadultswhoknowsthatstudentwell,wasalsodesigned.Inaddition,theEPOplannedtotakearestorativeapproachtostudentconductanddiscipline.

Leveragingtheuniversity’sexpertiseaswellasthatofcommunitypartnerswasanotherkeycomponentoftheEPOplan.Facultyandstafffromtheuniversitycontributedtotheproposaldevelopmentand

Page 9: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–3–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

implementationprocessinmanyways,rangingfromcommunicationstocurriculumandleadershiproles.

MethodsEvaluatorscollaborativelydevelopedacomprehensivedatacollectionplanforYear2withmembersoftheEPOOversightCommittee.Thedatacollectionplaninvolvedqualitativeandquantitativedatacollectionandanalysis.Someofthedatacollectionactivitiesweredesignedtoallowyear-to-yearcomparisons.Datafromallrelevantdatasourceswereanalyzedforeachsectionofthereport.Intheremainderofthissection,weprovidedetailsonthedatacollectedfortheevaluationofthe2016–17schoolyear.

FocusGroupsandInterviewsForfocusgroupsandinterviews,evaluatorscreatedcustomizedinstrumentsforeachpopulation.Focusgroupsandinterviewsaskedaboutimplementationofspecificinitiatives,evidenceofimpact,challenges,andanticipatedchanges.Manyfocusgroupsandnumerousinterviewswereconducted,withmostbeingconductedinthespringof2017.Table1summarizesthefocusgroupsconducted.

Table1.SummaryofYear2focusgroupsconducted

Population Date Numberoffocusgroups(Numberofparticipants)

Students• UpperSchool• LowerSchool• Quest• BigPicture• FreedomSchool

December2016–January2017

May2017(FreedomSchoolonly)

16(143participants)

ParentsofFreedomSchoolstudents May2017 1(5participants)

Teachers• UpperSchool,includingQuest,CTE• LowerSchool• BigPicture

April2017 10(25participants)

Teacherleaders April2017 1(14participants)

Counselors April2017 1(5participants)

Socialworkers April2017 1(4participants)

Assistantprincipals September2016andApril2017 2(8participants)

Partners(FACECommittee) April2017 1(5participants)

Paraprofessionals April2017 1(8participants)

Page 10: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–4–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

Population Date Numberoffocusgroups(Numberofparticipants)

Schoolsecurityofficers April2017

Interviewswereconductedwith:

• EPOOversightCommittee–6members

• Schooladministrators,includingthesuperintendent,CAO,principals,FreshmanAcademydirector,directorofspecialprograms,viceprincipalofdataandaccountability,specialassistanttothesuperintendent,familygroupcoaches,specialeducationdirector,attendancespecialist

Inaddition,brief5-minuteconversationswereheldwithaboutadozenparentsattheparent-teacherconferencenightinApril2017.

Observations

ClassroomObservations

DuringApril26–28,2017,WestEdstaffvisitedEasttoconductsystematicclassroomobservationsfocusedonteacherpractices.Acrossthethreedays,atotalof57classroomswereobserved.Ofalloftheclassroomsobserved,37percent,or20classrooms,wereintheLowerSchool;61percentwereintheUpperSchool.ManyoftheclassroomsattheUpperSchoolweremixed-gradeclassrooms.Aneffortwasmadetoobserveclassroomsacrossallsubjects.Thesubjectareasoftheobservedclassroomsincluded:

• 24%math(13classrooms)(Algebra,Geometry,Pre-calculus,BilingualMath)

• 20%Englishlanguagearts(11classrooms)(ELA/ENL,LiteracyWorkshop)

• 20%unifiedarts/specials(11classrooms)(Spanish,PersonalFinance,PhysicalEducation,StudioArts)

• 18%history/SS(10classrooms)(Global,GlobalReview,USHistory)

• 16%science(9classrooms)EarthScience,Chemistry,LivingEnvironment,Physics)

CollaborativePlanningTimeObservations

Evaluatorsobserved12contentareacollaborativeplanningtimeobservations(CPTs)in2017.CPTswereobservedintheUpperandLowerSchools,andwerefocusedonmathandEnglish/literacy.ACPTobservationprotocolwasusedtodocumenteachobservation(seeAppendixA).

ObservationsofFamilyGroup

Evaluatorsobserved18FamilyGroupsacrosstheUpperandLowerSchools.Observationsoccurredinthefallof2016andspringof2017.EvaluatorsusedaFamilyGroupobservationprotocoltodocumenteachobservation(seeAppendixA).

Page 11: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–5–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

ObservationsofSupportRooms

Atotalof12supportroomperiodswereobservedbytheevaluationteamduringspring2017.Onehundredtwostudentsand33adultswerepresentacrossthesesessions.EvaluatorscompletedSupportPeriodNote-takerformswhichwerereviewedtocapturegeneralinformationabouthowmanystudentsandadultswerepresentateachsession,thegradelevel,whetheranESOLstaffwaspresent,andthestartandendtimeoftheobservation.

Findings

SurveysSurveyswerecreatedtoaddresstheimplementationofspecificinitiativesatEast.Surveyswereconductedwithteachersandcertificatedstaff(e.g.,staffthataremembersoftheRochesterTeachersAssociations[RTA],likesocialworkers,counselors),schooladministrators,andstudents.

TeacherandStaffSurvey

TheteacherandstaffsurveywasconductedonlineusingSurveyMonkeyÒ.“Staff”referstostaffwhoareintheRTA.ThesurveywasconductedonApril7,2017,aftertheconclusionoftheSuperintendent’sConferenceDay.Atotalof163teachersandstaffrespondedtothesurvey.RespondentswereaskedtoindicatetheirspecificroleandwhethertheirresponsibilitieslieprimarilyintheLowerSchool,theUpperSchool,orinbothequally(seeTable2).Throughoutthisreport,figuresandchartsdisplaytheteacher/staffsurveydatadisaggregatedbywhetherprimaryresponsibilitieslieintheUpperorLowerSchool.Smallcellsizespreventedusfromseparatelyreportingthosewhoseresponsibilitieslieequallyinboth,however,theirresponsesareincludedintheoveralltotalpercentagesreported.Insomecases,aquestionappliesonlytoteachersandteacherleadersandonlytheirresponsesarepresented;thisisalwaysindicatedinatablenote.

Table2.PrimaryroleofrespondentstoTeacher/Staffsurvey

Response LowerSchool UpperSchool InUpperandLowerSchoolEqually

Teacher 75.6%

(n=34)

81.5%

(n=88)

50.0%

(n=5)

Teacherleader(morethan50%ofyourrole) 11.1%

(n=5)

5.6%

(n=6)

10.0%

(n=1)

Othercertifiedfaculty(e.g.,guidancecounselor,socialworker)

8.9%

(n=4)

12.0%

(n=13)

30.0%

(n=3)

Page 12: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–6–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

Response LowerSchool UpperSchool InUpperandLowerSchoolEqually

Other 4.4%

(n=2)

0.9%

(n=1)

10.0%

(n=1)

RespondentswerealsoaskedwhatyeartheyjoinedtheEastteam,toascertainwhethertherespondentpoolincludesthosewhowereatEastbeforeandsincetheEPO.Table3belowindicatesthatitvariesbyUpperandLowerSchool,butthattherespondentsincludeamixofteachersandstaffwhowereatEastpriortotheEPOandaftertheimplementationoftheEPO.

Table3.YearjoinedEastteam

Response LowerSchool UpperSchool InUpperandLowerSchoolEqually

Thisschoolyear(2016–17) 6.5%

(n=3)

9.3%

(n=10)

20.0%

(n=2)

Lastschoolyear(2015–16) 63.0%

(n=29)

44.4%

(n=48)

40.0%

(n=4)

2014–15schoolyearorearlier 30.43%

(n=14)

46.30%

(n=50)

40.00%

(n=4)

AdministratorSurvey

ThesurveyforadministratorswasalsoconductedonApril7aftertheSuperintendent’sConference.Administratorsincludedprincipals,viceprincipals,anddirectorlevelstaff,suchasdirectorofspecialprograms,directorofspecialeducation,Questdirector,BigPicturedirector,andFreedomSchooldirector.Therewere11respondentsoutofapossible16foraresponserateof69percent.Oftheadministrators,3reportedtheirresponsibilitieslieprimarilyintheUpperSchool,3intheLowerSchool,4whoseresponsibilitiesareequallyintheUpperandLowerSchools,and1whoseresponsibilitieslieprimarilywithAlternativePrograms.Becauseofthesmallnumberofrespondents,whendatafromtheadministratorsurveyaredisplayedinthisreport,theyarereportedasonegroupandnotbrokenoutbyareaofresponsibility.

StudentSurveys

Twoversionsofthesurveywerecreated,oneforUpperSchoolstudentsandoneforLowerSchoolstudents.ThesurveyswereadministeredduringFamilyGroupsessionsduringApril26–28,2017.Thesurveysaskedaboutspecificprogramsandsupports,includingthethingstheylikedmostandleastaboutEast.ThestudentsurveyswerecompletedusingpencilandpaperandwereenteredintoSurveyMonkeyÒsoftwareforanalysis.

Page 13: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–7–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

AttheLowerSchool,255studentsrespondedtothesurvey,with7.6percentbeinginthe6thgrade,49percentinthe7thgrade,and43.4percentinthe8thgrade(seeFigure1).AttheUpperSchool,390studentsrespondedtothesurvey.Therespondentswerefairlyevenlydistributedacross9th–12thgrades,with3studentsrespondingtheywereungradedorunsureoftheirgrade(seeFigure1).

Figure1.Studentsurveyrespondents,bygrade

QuantitativeData[InsertdescriptionafterreceiveYear2datainAugust.]

OrganizationoftheReportThisreportisorganizedintofourchapters.Chapters2and3containasummaryofdatacollectedandfindingsrelatedtomajorEPOinitiativesandstudentoutcomes.Conclusionsandrecommendations,includingrecommendationsforspecificprogramsandrecommendationsforongoingevaluation,arepresentedinChapter4.

ANoteaboutLanguageThroughoutthereportweusethefollowingterms:

• EPOleadership—ReferstomembersoftheEPOOversightCommittee,whichincludesthedeanoftheWarnerSchoolattheUniversityofRochester,theEastEPOprojectdirector,theEastEPOsuperintendent,andothers.

• Administrators—Referstoschool-basedadministrators,includingtheprincipals,viceprincipalsandviceprincipal–leveladministrators,andprogramdirectors.

• Teachersandstaff—Referstoallteachersandcertificatedstaff,whichincludesanystaffmemberwhoiscertificatedandcoveredbytheRTAagreement,suchascounselorsandsocialworkers.

6thgrade8%

thgrade49%

8thgrade43%

LowerSchool

9thgrade27%

10thgrade26%

11thgrade23%

12thgrade23%

Ungraded/unsure1%

UpperSchool

Page 14: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–8–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

Chapter2ProgressofMajorInitiativesThissectionofthereportaddressesthefollowingmajorEPOinitiatives:

• Leadership

• Professionallearning,includingcollaborativeplanningtimeandprofessionaldevelopment

• LearningTargets

• Teacherleaders

• Assessment

• Teacherpractices

• Curriculum

• SupportRoomModel

• FreshmanAcademy

• FamilyGroup

• RestorativePractices

• Alternativeprograms

• Familyandcommunityengagement

Foreachoftheseinitiatives,adescriptionofimplementationforYear2isprovided,alongwithchallenges,impactsand/orbenefits,and,insomecases,plansforYear3.Evidenceisprovidedintheuseofquotationsfromfocusgroups,interviews,andopen-endedsurveyitems.Whereapplicable,surveydataarealsousedtosupportfindings.

Leadership

EPOLeadershipTheleadershipstructuresofEastUpperandLowerSchools,throughtheEPO,haveremainedconsistentfromYear1toYear2;however,whathaschangedaresomeoftheleadershippractices.TheEPOhasaleadershipstructurethatincludesaprojectdirector,Dr.SteveUebbing,andasuperintendent,Dr.ShaunNelms.Thereisalsoauniversity-basedEPOOversightCommitteethatoverseesanddirectstheEPOingeneralandtowhichthesuperintendentreports.ThiscommitteeiscomprisedoftheEPOprojectdirector,superintendent,thechiefacademicofficer(CAO),andWarnerSchoolleadersandfaculty/staff.InYear1,theEPOOversightCommitteewasdescribedasbeingactivelyinvolvedintheschool.InYear2,

Page 15: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–9–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

anumberofrespondentsamongtheschoolleadershipandstaffreportedthattheOversightCommitteehassteppedbackandislessinvolvedintheday-to-dayoperationoftheschool.Thisisseenasavoteofconfidencefortheschool-basedleadershipteam.Itwasalsodescribed,byEPOleaders,asanexplicitdecisiontooverseeandprovideguidancebutnottobeinvolvedinday-to-daydecisions.

TeachersalsoreportedahighlevelofconfidenceintheorganizationandthebenefitoftheEPOleadershipmodelatEast.Eightypercentoftherespondentstotheteacher/staffsurveyreportedagreeingorstronglyagreeingthat“TheorganizationoftheleadershipteamsupportseffectiveprogresstowardschoolimprovementandachievementofEPOgoals.”AhighpercentagealsoreportedunderstandingtheEPOleadership,withmorethan85percentofrespondentsindicatingtheydidsotosomeoragreatextent.

School-levelLeadershipBythestartofYear2inSeptember2016,onlytwooftheoriginalnineindividualswhoservedinaprincipalorvice-principalroleremainedintherolethattheyhadatthebeginningofYear1.AnewprincipalwashiredfortheLowerSchool.Severalnewviceprincipalswerealsohired.Inaddition,severalleaderschangedroles;forexample,theviceprincipaloftheFreshmanAcademyfor2015-16becameaviceprincipalattheLowerSchool.InrecognitionofsomeofthechallengesinYear1andwithafulladministrativeteaminplaceforYear2,effortsweremadeinthefallof2016toclarifyrolesandresponsibilities.Forexample,anewmatrixofresponsibilitieswasdevelopedthatlistedalladministratorsandtheirformal,aswellassomeinformal,responsibilities.TeachersandotherleaderswerealsooptimisticthathavingafullystaffedleadershipteamwilladdresstheleadershipchallengesexperiencedbytheLowerSchoolinYear1.

CommunicationwasachallengeleadershipfacedinYear1,andeffortswereundertakentoaddressitinYear2.Byallaccountsmuchimprovementwasmade.Inthesurvey,84percentofteachersandstaffagreedorstronglyagreedthat“communicationfromtheschoolleadershipisclear.”ThesurveywasnotconductedinYear1,butbaseduponfeedbackfromteachersandstaffattheendofYear1comparedtotheoverallpositivesurveyandfocusgroupfeedbackfromteachersinspring2017,itisclearthatcommunicationandconsistencyofmessagehasimproved.

Manyteachersandleadersseetheroleofthechiefacademicofficerasindispensabletothemodel,thoughitdoesnotnecessarilyhavetobebasedattheuniversity.Thisroleallowsaleadershippositionwhosesolefocusisinstruction.Thisfreesuptheprincipalsandviceprincipalstobethefirstresponderstheyareexpectedtobeintheoften-chaoticexperienceofurbanschools.

DistributedLeadershipInadditiontotheformalleadershipstructureattheschool,thesuperintendenthadagoaltoimplementadistributedleadershipmodelwhereteachersandstaffareempoweredtotakeactionandwhereleadershippracticesarenotdictated.InYear1,bothteachersandleadersstruggledtosomeextentwithwhatwassometimesperceivedasalackofspecificdirections.Year2hasseenprogressinadistributedleadershipmodeltakingholdamongschoolleadersandteachers.Forexample,leadersrealizetheyhavethefreedomtomakeday-to-daydecisionswithintheframeworkoftheEPOandexistingstructures.

Page 16: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–10–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

Teacherleadersservingasinformalleadersareseenasakeypartofthemodelandfrequentlyasabridgebetweenteachers/theclassroomandleadership.ThemostcommonlycitedexampleofdistributedteacherleadershipinactionistherestructuringoftheUpperSchoolsupportroomsandsupportperiodsthatwereteacherledattheendofYear1andwereimplementedinYear2.Duringthespring/summer2016,agroupofspecialeducationteachers,whowerealsosupportroomteachers,establishedtheUpperSchoolSupportRoomAdvisoryCommitteewhichproposedchangestoimprovetheoperationofthesupportmodel.Thechangesaddressedmanagementandlogisticschallenges,studentattendance,andeffectivenessonstudentoutcomes.ThechangestotheSupportRoommodelinUpperSchoolaredescribedas“completelyteacherdrivenandteacherled.”

Adistributedleadershipmodelisidentifiedwiththepromisingpracticeof“MotivatingTeacherstoMaintainCommitmenttoTransformingtheSchool”tosustainrapidschoolturnaround(Hitt&Myers,2017).Someleadersandteachersdesireclearerresponsibilitiesthatareassociatedwithaleadershipmodel.Somesharedthatthemodelworkswellifyouarea“gogetterandaself-starter”butthatforothersthislackofclarityandtheonusonself-motivationcanbediscouraging.ThereweresomedifferencesintheextenttowhichteachersandstaffattheUpperandLowerSchoolsbelievethereisadistributiveleadershipmodelattheschool.SeeFigure2below,whichindicatesthat83percentoftheUpperSchoolteachersbelievetosomeoragreatextentthatthereisadistributiveleadershipmodelattheschoolcomparedto65percentattheLowerSchool.Similarly,whenaskedabouttheextenttowhichteachersareempoweredtotakeactionstoimprovethingsatEast,85percentofteachers/staffattheUpperSchoolreported“tosomeoragreatextent,”comparedto76percentfortheLowerSchool(seeFigure3).ThesuperintendentandotherschoolleadersarenotunawareofthesechallengesbutbelievethatdistributedleadershipiskeytotheEPOmodelandallowstheleadersandteachersto“focusontheprinciplesthatdriveourpurposehere:buildcoherence,empowerothers,holdourselvesandothersaccountable,autonomy,andasafeenvironmentforteacherstoexperienceandfail.”

Figure2.Extentteachers/staffbelievedistributiveleadershipmodelexistsatUpperandLowerSchools

15%

13%

13%

64%

52%

70%

9%

11%

10%

1%

0%

2%

10%

24%

5%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Total

LowerSchool

UpperSchool

Toagreatextent-4 3 2 Notatall-1 Don'tknow

Page 17: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–11–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

Figure3.Extentteachers/stafffeelempoweredtotakeactionstoimprovethingsatEastUpperandLowerSchools

UniversityRoleTheuniversityholdstheEPO,andseveraluniversityfacultymembershaveleadershiprolesintheEPO.Manyotheruniversityfacultyandstaff,especiallyfromtheWarnerSchool,providesupportforleadershipandteacherdevelopment,curriculumdevelopment,andmore.WarnerSchoolfacultyandstaff,includingcurriculumandteachingexpertsfromtheCenterforProfessionalDevelopmentandEducationReform,wereinvolvedinthedevelopmentoftheEPOplan,andmanycontinuetobeinvolvedintheschoolprovidingconsultingoradvisingtosupportcurriculumimplementationandprofessionaldevelopment.

Whenaskedtodescribetheuniversityroleanditsimportance,teachers/staffandleadersatEastconsistentlyemphasizedtwokeypoints:(1)leadershiprolesofsuperintendentandchiefacademicofficerand(2)extensiveprofessionaldevelopmentforcurriculumandinstructionprovidedbythefacultyassociatedwiththeuniversity.Infocusgroups,teacheropinionsoftheuniversity’sinvolvementinEastweremixed,butteachersurveys,whichrepresentalargerproportionoftheteacherpopulation,werestronglypositive,withasensethatURbringsresourcesforstudentsandresearch-basedpracticesforteachers,andanimprovedreputationofEastinthecommunity.

Whileitisunusualtohaveachiefacademicofficerattheschoollevel,leadersandteacherssharedthattheybelievetheexistenceofthisrole—andahighlyqualifiedindividualinit—allowsforacoherent

20%

17%

19%

64%

59%

66%

14%

20%

14%

1%

4%

0%

1%

1%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Total

LowerSchool

UpperSchool

Toagreatextent-4 3 2 Notatall-1 Don'tknow

Page 18: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–12–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

andconsistentfocusonteachingandlearning.Theprincipalsarestillinvolvedinteachingandlearning,butintheoften-chaoticenvironmentofanurbanhighschool,itisimpossibleforittobetheirprimaryfocus.TheCAOpositionallowsalaser-likefocusoninstruction.

Intermsofprofessionaldevelopment,usingtheframeworkoftheEPOplan,theschool’sProfessionalDevelopmentCommittee,whichconsistsofuniversityfacultyandschool-basedteachersandleaders,developedafive-yearprofessionaldevelopmentplanthatiscurrentlybeingimplemented,andwillbediscussedinmoredetailbelow.Oneschoolleaderemphasizedtheroletheuniversity,theWarnerSchool,andtheCenterforProfessionalDevelopmentandEducationReformplayinprofessionaldevelopmentattheschool:“Wegetasignificantamountofprofessionaldevelopmentfromtheuniversity.It’sthehighestqualityI’veeverseeninaschool;it’sverysustained,andtheyhavealong-termplanfordevelopingstaff,andwewouldn’thavethatwithouttheuniversity.”Accordingtotheresultsoftheteacher/staffsurvey,thereisoverwhelmingagreement(93%)thattheUniversityofRochesterhelpstosupporteffectiveteachingatEast(seeFigure4).Infocusgroups,someteacherssharedtheirperspectivethateverythinghastobedonethe“URway,”andthatitdevaluestheirprofessionalexperience.However,otherteacherssharedthattheURbringsresearchtopracticeandbelievestherearerichexperiencesfromcollaboratingwithUR.

Figure4.Extentteachers/staffbelievetheUniversityofRochesterhelpssupporteffectiveteachingatEast

Thevastmajorityofteachers/staffatEastbelievethattheuniversity’sinvolvementisanoverallbenefit.Fully97percentattheLowerSchooland95percentattheUpperSchoolagreeorstronglyagreewith

45%

49%

43%

48%

44%

50%

5%

5%

5%

1%

0%

1%

2%

2%

1%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Total

LowerSchool

UpperSchool

PercentofRespondents(Totaln=155)

StronglyAgree Agree Disagree StronglyDisagree Don'tKnow

Page 19: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–13–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

thatstatement(seeFigure5).Ingeneral,theyalsobelievethattheuniversity’sinvolvementinEastincreasesopportunitiesforstudentsandsupportsstudentlearning(seeFigures6and7).

Figure5.Extentteachers/staffbelievethatUniversityofRochesterinvolvementisanoverallbenefittoEast

Figure6.Extentteachers/staffbelievethatUniversityofRochesterinvolvementsupportsstudentlearningatEast

55%

60%

54%

41%

37%

41%

3%

2%

4%

1%

1%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Total

LowerSchool

UpperSchool

PercentofRespondents(Totaln=155)

StronglyAgree Agree Disagree StronglyDisagree Don'tKnow

43%

49%

41%

48%

40%

50%

6%

7%

7%

1%

1%

2%

5%

1%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Total

LowerSchool

UpperSchool

PercentofRespondents(Totaln=155)

StronglyAgree Agree Disagree StronglyDisagree Don'tKnow

Page 20: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–14–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

Figure7.Extentteachers/staffbelievethatUniversityofRochesterinvolvementincreasesopportunitiesforstudentsatEast

ProfessionalLearningThissectiononprofessionallearningaddressescollaborativeplanningtimeandotherprofessionaldevelopmentopportunities.Theroleofteacherleaders,whileaprofessionallearningsupport,isdiscussedinaseparatesectionbelow.

CollaborativePlanningTimeTherearetwotypesofcollaborativeplanningtimeatEast—onecontent-orsubject-specificthathappensacrossgrades,knownmoregenerallyasCPT,andonethatisgrade-level-specificbutoccursacrosssubjects,knownasinter-departmentalorIDCPT.Eachmeetsatleastonceaweek,dependingontheschoolschedule.TeacherleaderssupportthecontentCPTs,andanadministrator,suchasaviceprincipal,supportsthegrade-levelIDCPTs.

RespondingtochallengesidentifiedwithCPTinYear1,schoolleadersandothersidentifiedareasforimprovementforCPTinYear2toimproveitseffectivenessinsupportingteacherpractice.TheroleofadministratorsinCPTwasclarifiedtospecifythattheyareexpectedtoleadgrade-levelIDCPTandareinvitedtoparticipateincontentCPTaswell.Coaches/teacherleadersareexpectedtoruncontentinamorestructuredway,withanagenda,andwithaportionofeachCPTfocusedoncommonschool-widework,suchaslearningtargetsorCommonFormativeAssessments.BelowwediscussIDCPTandCPTinmoredetail.

55%

60%

53%

40%

37%

41%

3%

2%

4%

1%

1%

1%

1%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Total

LowerSchool

UpperSchool

PercentofRespndents(Totaln=155)

StronglyAgree Agree Disagree StronglyDisagree Don'tKnow

Page 21: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–15–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

IDCPT

Theexpectationisthatteachersandadministratorsmeetingrade-levelteamsatleastonceaweek.Thesemeetingsbringtogetherteachersfromdifferentdisciplinesandareanopportunitytomonitortheprogressofstudentsinaparticulargrade,identifystudentsforsupport,anddiscussotherissuesspecifictothegrade.ResponsestotheteachersurveyindicatedifferencesintheregularityofIDCPT,withamajority(73%)ofLowerSchoolteachersreportingtheyregularlyengageinIDCPTmeetingstoagreatextentcomparedtoonly49percentofUpperSchoolteachers(seeFigure8).

Figure8.Teachers’reportedengagementinregular(atleastweekly)IDCPTmeetings

Note:Includesresponsesofteachersandteacherleadersonly.

Evaluatorsobserved,andheardfromteachersandadministratorsinfocusgroups,thatIDCPToperatesquitedifferentlyacrosstheschool.Forexample,someteachersintheLowerSchoolreportedthattheylookatstudentdataintheirIDCPT,includinglookingatdataonindividualstudentstoseewhoispassingorfailingandtoidentifystudentsforintervention.QuestteachersalsosharedthattheirCPTisfocusedonidentifyingstudentsforintervention,butthatitisbasedmoreonteacherobservation.Figure9belowshowsthepercentageofteachersintheUpperandLowerSchoolsthatreportusingstudentdataintheirIDCPTs.Weseethat65percentofteachersattheLowerSchoolreportusingdatacomparedtoteachersintheUpperSchool(48%).IntheUpperSchool,teachers’responsesvariedwidely,fromthosewhosharedthefeelingthatIDCPTisawasteoftimeandotherssharingthatanytimetogettogetherwithcolleaguesisvaluable.ThesemixedopinionsabouttheusefulnessofIDCPTareevidentintheresultsoftheteacher/staffsurveyresponsesdepictedinFigure10thatshowarelativelysmallpercentageofteachersandteacherleaderswhorespondedtothesurveybelievethatIDCPTenhancesteaching.AtboththeUpper(52%)andLowerSchools(61%),amajorityrespondednegatively

54%

73%

49%

13%

14%

12%

7%

3%

8%

22%

8%

28%

4%

3%

3%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Total

LowerSchool

UpperSchool

PercentofRespondents(Totaln=134)

Toagreatextent-4 3 2 Notatall-1 Don'tknow

Page 22: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–16–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

(selecting1[notatall]or2)tothequestionoftheextenttowhichparticipationinIDCPTenhancedtheirteaching.QuotationsfromteachersaboutIDCPTalsotendedtobenegative,asthisexampleillustrates:

“IDCPThasbeenverydisappointing.Ourmeetingsarenotwellplannedanditappearsasthoughouradministratordoesnotthinkpurposefullyabouthowtousethistimeandhasnolong-termvision.…ThereisaverynegativeatmosphereinourIDCPTandlittleisaccomplished.”

Figure9.ExtentteachersreportedusingstudentdatainIDCPT

Note:Includesresponsesofteachersandteacherleadersonly.

Figure10.ExtentteachersbelieveparticipationinIDCPTenhancedteaching

Note:Responsesincludeonlyteachersandteacherleaders.

65%

35%

LowerSchool

Yes

No

48%52%

UpperSchool

Yes

No

11%

17%

9%

23%

14%

26%

28%

39%

24%

26%

22%

28%

12%

8%

13%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Total

LowerSchool

UpperSchool

PercentofRespondents(Totaln=133)

Toagreatextent-4 3 2 Notatall-1 Don'tknow

Page 23: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–17–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

ContentAreaCPT

InadditiontoIDCPTthereisacontentareaCPTforeachsubjectthatisledbyateacherleaderorcoach.BenefitsofCPTreportedinYear1includehavingregulartimeandspacetoengageinprofessionalconversationsaboutpracticesandstudentwork.SomeofthechallengesinYear1includedwidevariabilityinthequalityofCPTs,withnotallteachersregularlyparticipating.AttheendofYear2,thevastmajorityofteachersatboththeLower(92%)andUpperSchools(89%)reportedparticipatinginCPTatleastweekly(seeFigure11).

Figure11.ExtentofteachersengaginginCPTatleastweeklyatendofYear2

Note:Includesresponsesofteachersandteacherleadersonly.

AdministratorsclarifiedandincreasedtheexpectationsforCPTsforYear2,includinghavingacoachrunthemeetingandhavingsimilarexpectationsabouthowtheyoperate.InYear2,itbecameexplicitthatcoachesusetheirCPTwithteacherstoreinforceandextendcontentfromprofessionallearning.Forexample,eachmonthlystaffmeetingfocusedononeofthesixcriteriaofgoodlearningtargets.IntheCPTfollowingeachofthesestaffmeetings,coachesreinforcedthemessageandworkedwithteacherstodeepenunderstandingandpracticeofthecontent.AnotherexpectationforCPTisthatstudentdataandstudentworkareused.AhighpercentageofteachersatboththeLower(78%)andUpper(82%)SchoolsreportedusingstudentdataintheirCPT(seeFigure12).

90%

92%

89%

5%

3%

7%

3%

3%

3%

1%

3%

1%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Total

LowerSchool

UpperSchool

PercentofRespondents(Totaln=134)

Toagreatextent-4 3 2 Notatall-1 Don'tknow

Page 24: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–18–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

Figure12.Extentofteachers’reporteduseofstudentdataincontentareaCPT

Note:Includesresponsesofteachersandteacherleadersonly.

Accordingtothesurvey,teachersandteacherleadersreportthatparticipationincontentareaCPTmeetingsenhancedtheirteaching(seeFigure13),thoughthereweresomedifferencesattheUpperandLowerSchools.AttheLowerSchool,81percentoftheteachersandteacherleadersreportedthatparticipationinthecontentareaCPTenhancedtheirteachingtosomeoragreatextent,comparedto68percentattheUpperSchool.

Figure13.ExtentteachersbelieveparticipationincontentareaCPTsenhancedtheirteaching

Note:Includesresponsesofteachersandteacherleadersonly.

78%

22%

LowerSchool

Yes

No82%

18%

UpperSchool

Yes

No

54%

62%

49%

18%

19%

19%

20%

8%

26%

5%

5%

6%

2%

5%

1%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Total

LowerSchool

UpperSchool

PercentofRespondents(Totaln=134)

Toagreatextent-4 3 2 Notatall-1 Don'tknow

Page 25: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–19–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

Whileamajorityofteachers’surveyresponsesindicatethatCPTishelpfulinenhancingtheirteaching,infocusgroups,teacherssharedawidevarietyofopinionsontheoperationandusefulnessofCPTs.SometeachersreportedthattheircontentCPTsareusefulandotherssharedthattheircontentCPTcouldbemoreeffective.

CoachesandbuildingadministratorssharedthattheybelieveCPTinYear2allowsforaconsistentmessagingaboutinstructionalexpectations.CoachesalsosharedthattheirroleinCPTisclearerthisyear.However,someteachersperceiveCPTtobetopdownordirective,withmoredirectionfromcoachesthanteachercollaboration.TeacherssharedthesevaryingopinionsaboutCPTinfocusgroupsandonthesurvey,asthefollowingquotationsillustrate:

“SometeachersgetannoyedbecauseCPTissoactionpacked;butwithreallyproductiveactivities.Someteachersgetfrustratedbecausesomearebigideaplanningandsometeacherswanttimetoplanfortheirclassesorco-plan.Iagreewecouldhavealittlemoreofthat,butIthinkthethingswedoaresovaluableweshouldn’tstopthem.”

“LiteracyCPTisgreatbecauseit'sfocusedoninstructionandlookingatdata.Ourcoachfacilitatessupereffectivelyandthere'salwaysaclear-cutobjectiveandagenda,andshe'sflexibleandresponsivetoourneeds.”

“OurcontentCPTisthoughtfullyplannedandalignedtoschoolgoals/initiatives,aswellascurriculumgoals/initiatives.Webenefitfromhavingoutsideconsultantswhoregularlymeetwithourinstructionalcoachandprovideindividualcoachingtoteachersonourteam.Wealwaysreceiveagendasaheadoftimeandusetimewiselyinmeetings.Ouractivitiesbenefitourdailyinstructionandhelpinformourlong-termplanning.Wealsohaveengagedinmeaningfuldataanalysisandlearningaboutinstructionalpracticesthatarespecifictoourdepartment.”

“CPTisnotaseffectiveasitcanbe.Itcouldbefabulousbutwestrugglestill.There’snoaccountabilityinCPT.”

Evaluatorsobserved12contentareaCPTsin2017,acrossallgradelevels.EvaluatorsobservedthatmostCPTs(75%)usedanagendaandfollowedasimilarformatfortheuseoftime,withasectionondiscussingandreinforcinglearningtargets.Theuseofstudentdataorstudentworkwereonlyobservedin37percentoftheCPTs.WhilenoteveryminuteofeveryCPTwasusedwell,discussionstendedtofocusonrelevantissues,withplanningforinstructionobservedinthreeCPTsanddiscussinginstructionalstrategiesinsixclassrooms.

ProfessionalDevelopmentExtensiveprofessionaldevelopmentforteachers,staff,andadministratorsisacentralpartoftheEPOplan.TheongoingscheduleofembeddedandsupplementalprofessionaldevelopmentcontinuedinYear2withtheimplementationofthe5-YearProfessionalLearningPlandevelopedbytheschool’sProfessionalLearningCommittee.ProfessionallearningatEastisclearlythoughtoutandcoherent,anddesignedtosupportchangesinteacherpracticesandtosupportimplementationofexpectedpractices.

Page 26: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–20–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

Ongoingembeddedprofessionallearningismostimmediatelycarriedoutbycoaches/teacherleadersthroughCollaborativePlanningTime(discussedinaseparatesection),butalsothroughtheUniversityofRochester’sCenterforProfessionalDevelopmentandEducationReform,theengagementofconsultantsfromELLearning,andothers.LeadersandadministratorsatEastandconsultantsandstafffromtheCenterforProfessionalDevelopmentandEducationReformalsoprovideperiodicprofessionallearningopportunitiessuchasthroughsuperintendentconferencedays,monthlystaffmeetings,andsummerprofessionallearning.Inthesummerof2016,priortothestartofYear2,extensiveprofessionallearningwasrequiredofallnewandreturningstaff,includingafullweekofcurriculumdevelopmentworkandmore.

The5-YearProfessionalLearningPlanisdescribedasaworkinprogressbutausefuldocumentthatmapsouthowallofthenecessaryprofessionaldevelopmentacrosscontentandpracticesaresequencedovertimetosupporteffectiveimplementation.Administratorssharedthatitishelpfultoseehowallofthedifferentinitiativesaregoingtobeimplemented.Teachersandadministratorssometimesexpressedfrustrationthatimplementationofsomeinitiativesisbeingdoneinstages,butthattheprofessionallearningplanhelpsthemtorealizethatitwouldbeimpossibletofullyimplementlearningtargets,UnderstandingbyDesign(UbD),newcurricula,RestorativePractices,andmoreallatonce.Theplanmapsout“howandwhen”professionallearningwillbeconductedandreinforcedovertime,toensureathoughtfulimplementation.

TeachersandteacherleadersprovidedsomefeedbackaboutprofessionallearningatEastinfocusgroupsandonthesurvey.Ingeneral,theprofessionallearningisviewedashighquality.Teachersandleadersreportthattheoccasionalconsultantisnotparticularlyeffective.Teacherssharedthattheauditorium,acommonplaceforwhole-staffprofessionallearning,isnotconducivetoeffectiveprofessionaldevelopmentbecausetheroomdoesnotallowforcollaborationandthedarknessoftheroomisnotconducivetoprofessionallearning.Therearedifferingopinionsonwhetherhalf-dayprofessionallearningisproductiveornot.Someteachersandstaffreportedadesiretohaveopportunitiesforself-selectedordifferentiatedprofessionallearning.AfewteachersnotedthatprofessionallearningatEastdoesnotalwaystakeintoconsiderationthespecificneedsofspecialeducationorEnglishlearnerstudents.Nonetheless,teachers,teacherleaders,andadministratorsallsharedthattheprofessionallearningatEastsincetheEPOimplementationisthemost,andmostintensive,professionallearningopportunitiestheyhavehad.

Theteacher/staffsurveyallowedforopen-endedresponsestoanumberofquestionsaboutavarietyoftopics,suchaswhathascontributedmosttotheprogressofEastandwhatarethemostimportantchallengestoaddress.Professionallearningwasmentionednumeroustimes,mostlyinpositiveways.Asampleofsomeofthecomments(includingsuggestionsforimprovement)fromtheteachersurveyareprovidedbelow:

“Staffmembershaveaccesstoveryhighqualityprofessionaldevelopmentbothon-andoff-sitewhichhelpsusimproveourpractice.”

“Theabilitytoalwayshavesomethingnewtoimplement,theprofessionaldevelopmentsIhaveattendedhavehelpedmegrowandbuildonwhatIalreadyknew.”

Page 27: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–21–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

“GreatPDopportunitiestogrowintobestpractices.”

“Specialeducationisnotsupportedandisanafterthoughtforprofessionallearning,collaboration,andbuildingasolidprogramforstudents.”

“Professionaldevelopmentshouldbedifferentiated.Moreneedstobedonetoensurethatteachingandcurriculumisculturallyrelevantforstudents.”

LearningTargetsTherequirementforallteacherstousedailylearningtargetsatEasthasbeenconsistentfromYear1.Thepurposeofusinglearningtargetsisthatinstructionisexplicitandintentional,andthatthegoalsofthelessonarecrystalclear.Observationdatafromtheevaluators,aswellasfromschooladministratorsthemselves,indicatedthatasmallmajorityofteachersusedlearningtargetsinYear1butthatthesewerenotnecessarilyhighquality.Theyoftenwerenotwritteninlanguagethatwaseasyforscholarstounderstandandwerenotoftenwritteninawaythatwasassessablebyteachersinthelesson.InYear2,expectationsandprofessionaldevelopmenteffortstosupportstronglearningtargetswereredoubled.Learningtargetswereaddressedinmini-lessonsatsevenmonthlystaffmeetings,witheachofthesemeetingsfocusedononeofsevenexpectedcriteriaofgoodlearningtargets.ThenoneortwocontentCPTsfollowingthesemonthlystaffmeetingsfocusedonapplyingandmoredeeplyunderstandingthespecificcriterion.

Alsosupportingthemessagethatlearningtargetsareimportantandexpectedisthatteachers’useoflearningtargetsbecamepartofwhatislookedforininstructionalwalkthroughsthatwerebeingconductedmoreregularlyinYear2bytheviceprincipals,principals,CAO,andsuperintendent.Oneadministratorbelievesthereismorebuy-inforlearningtargetspartlybecauseteachersseethattheyarenotgoingaway.

Infocusgroupsandsurveys,teacherssharedhowtheyarecomingtounderstandthatgoodlearningtargetscanbetoolsforenhancingstudentlearning.Forexample,oneteachershared,“ThisyearIrealizethepotentialoflearningtargetsandtheusefulnessofassessingthemthroughthelessonandmakingsuretheymatch.”OtherteacherssharedthatiftheywenttoUR,theyknowlearningtargetsandsometimestheprofessionallearningfocusonthemistoomuch.Accordingtosurveydata,87percentofteachersandteacherleadersintheUpperandLowerSchoolsbelievelearningtargetsenhancedtheirteachingtosomeoragreatextent(Figure14).AmajorityofteachersattheUpper(84%)andLower(79%)Schoolsalsobelievethatuseofdailylearningtargetsenhancedstudentlearning(seeFigure15).

Page 28: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–22–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

Figure14.Extentteachersbelievetheuseofdailylearningtargetsenhancedtheirteaching

Note:Includesresponsesofteachersandteacherleadersonly.

Figure15.Extentteachersbelievetheuseofdailylearningtargetsenhancedstudentlearning

Note:Includesresponsesofteachersandteacherleadersonly.

DuringYear2classroomobservations,evaluatorsobservedamoreconsistentuseoflearningtargets,andschooladministratorsconcurwiththatobservation.Oneadministratornoted,“Ithinkwehavemadetremendousprogresswithlearningtargetsbeingposteduniformlythroughouttheschool.Ithinkit’sactuallyveryrarefortherenottobealearningtarget.”Higherqualitylearningtargetsareaworkinprogress,asevidencedinFigure16belowwhichcomparesthecharacteristicsoflearningtargets

46%

62%

39%

41%

26%

48%

9%

10%

9%

3%

3%

3%

1%

1%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Total

LowerSchool

UpperSchool

PercentofRespondents(Totaln=140)

Toagreatextent-4 3 2 Notatall-1 Don'tknow

41%

59%

34%

42%

21%

50%

13%

18%

11%

3%

3%

3%

1%

2%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Total

LowerSchool

UpperSchool

PercentofRespondents(Totaln=140)

Toagreatextent-4 3 2 Notatall-1 Don'tknow

Page 29: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–23–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

observedbyevaluatorsduringsystematicclassroomobservationsinthespringof2016andspringof2017.Thisyear,learningtargetswereobservedinalmost74percentofclassrooms,comparedtoalmost66percentlastyear.Theuseoflearningtargetsthatmeetthecriteriaforhigh-qualitytargetsisstillaworkinprogress,butprogressisevident.Theadministratorwentontosay,“Ithinkthisyearthefocushasbecomedeeper—tohaveaspecificandcontextualizedlearningtargetthatcanbeassessedinthatchunkoftimeandthatisbasedonwhatstudentsarelearninginsteadofwhattheyaredoing.…Ifeelthatteachersarereallystartingtounderstandthatoverasequenceoftimethisshouldreflectatotalunitofunderstanding.…We’renottherebutwe’remakingprogresstowardassessmentofdailylearningtargets.”

Comparingthecharacteristicsoflearningtargetsobservedlastspringtothisspring(Figure16),thedataindicateasimilarpercentageof“nolearningtargetpostedorobserved”in34percentofclassroomsvisitedlastyearand36percentthisyear.Evaluatorsinfrequentlysawteachers“unpacking”thelearningtargetwithstudents,eitherin2016(12%)orin2017(17%).Andwhilestillnotfrequent,teachersmakingreferencetothelearningtargetthroughoutthelessonwasobservedmorefrequentlyin2017(24%)comparedto2016(12%).Inaddition,evaluatorsnotedthatthisyearin13classroomstheteachersalsoreferencedorexplicitlyusedthelearningtargetduringthelesson.Explicitsuccesscriteriaforthelearningtargetwasobservedinonlyfourclassrooms.Oneevaluatornotedthatwhenasked,thestudentswereabletoexplainthelessonobjective.EvaluatorsobservedlearningtargetsnotonlypostedonchartpaperandSMARTBoards,butalsovisibleonstudenthandoutsandassessments.

Figure16.Extentcharacteristicsoflearningtargetswereobserved,spring2016andspring2017

Notes:Notonobservationprotocolin2016.*Includesresponsesofteachersandteacherleadersonly.

73.6%

17.0%

24.5%

35.8%

30.2%

7.5%

65.90%

12.20%

12.20%

34.10%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0%

LTpostedinkidfriendlylanguage

LTisexplained/unpackedwithscholars

LTisreferenced/explicitlyusedthroughoutthelesson

LTisnotornotvisiblethroughoutthelesson

LTislearning-centered*

SuccesscriteriaofLTisspecificandcontextualized*

2016 2017

Page 30: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–24–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

Insystematicclassroomobservations,evaluatorsalsolookedforthehighestplannedlevelofBloom’staxonomyindicatedbythelearningtarget,aswellasthehighestobservedlevel.Ofthe39classroomswhereevaluatorsobservedlearningtargetsposted,10ofthetargetswerewrittenorplannedatthe“rememberingorunderstanding”level,10wereatthe“applying”level,and14wereatthe“analyzing”level;sevenfellbetweenthe“evaluating”and“creating”levels.Mostofthetargetsfellbetween“applying”(18%)and“analyzing”(26%).Comparedtolastyear,targetswerewrittenatahigherBloom’staxonomylevel.Lastyearjustseventargetswerebetween“analyzing”and“creating,”andonlytwoclassesdisplayedtargetsatthe“creating”level.

ThehighestlevelofBloom’staxonomyevaluatorsobservedintheclassroomswas“applying,”foundin38percentoftheclassrooms.Thirteenpercentofthestudentswereengagedin“analytical”thinking,sixpercentin“evaluating,”andsixpercentin“creating.”Inthreeclassrooms,theobserverwasunabletodeterminewhatlevelofBloom’staxonomywasbeingused.Overall,thisisanimprovementfromlastyear,whenonlysixclassroomswereobservedinwhichstudentswerebeingactuallyengagedin“analytical”thinkingandjusttwowereengagedin“creative”thinking.

TeacherLeadersTeacherleadersaredescribedbyadministratorsandEPOleadersasintegraltotheEastEPOmodel.Oneadministratornoted:“Well,Ithinkthey[teacherleaders]areoneoftheessentialpiecestothesuccessoftheEPO.”Itisthroughteacherleadersthatprofessionaldevelopmentissustainedandembeddedinteachers’work.Teacherleaderscontinue,reinforce,andsupportmessagesandexpectationsaboutteacherpracticesinCPTandinteachercoaching.Teacherleaders“getthehaytothehorses”andreachintotheclassroommorethanadministratorsorconsultantscan.Theydeveloprelationshipswithteachers;sometimestheymodelorco-teach;andtheyareseenasaresourcetoteachers.Indeed,oneadministratorshared:

“CPTisessentialtotheworkwe’retryingtodo–andlikewithanything–somearemoresuccessfulthanothers–wecan’tgiveourteachersalltheprofessionallearningtheyneedtohavewithoutCPT–wecan’tmoveinstructionandcurriculumforwardwithoutit.Isupervise[subject]intheLowerSchool;inCPTwearedecidingwhatismostimportantinuseofthattime–howtomovetheagendaforward,whatsupportsdotheteachersneed;andIjustcan’timaginenothavingthatandstilltryingtodothework.CPTsetsusapartfromanyotherbuildinginthedistrict.”

Teacherleadershaveasimilarunderstandingoftheirroleasevidencedbythefollowingquotationsfromvariouscoaches:

“Wearethedriversofeverythinginstructionalinthebuildingacrosstheboard.”

“Alloftheinstructionalinitiatives—we’reliketentaclesreachingintotheclassrooms.”

Overall,itappearsthatteacherleadersarewellrespectedandvaluedbyteachers.Teacherssharedthattheyvaluethesupportfromtheircoaches,includingopportunitiesformodeling,co-teaching,andco-planning.Therearedifferingopinions,however,withsometeacherssharingthattheircoachesdonot

Page 31: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–25–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

haveenoughtimetodevoteattentiontoeachteacher,orsharingthattheyfeeltheircoachesarejusttheretobringmessagesfromtheadministrationandlesstheretosupportwhatteachersneedasindividuals.

Significantchangesweremadetothescheduleandtoexpectationsforcoachestoaddresschallengesraisedafterthefirstyearofimplementation.Thenumberofteacherleadersincreasedthisyear,witheverydepartmenthavingatleastone.Teacherleadershavereducedteachingloadstoprovidemoretimeforcoachingcycleswithteachers.Teacherleadersparticipateinwalkthroughsofteacherstheyaresupporting.TeacherleadersarenowexpectedtofacilitatecontentCPTmeetings.CoachesalsohavetheirownCPTledbytheCAO.Thisisasignificantchangethatpermitscoachestobeonthesamepageandtohaveacommonplanforsupportingteachers.ThisCPTforcoachesallowsthemtogetsupportfortheirpractice,butisalsousedasavenuetodisseminateinformation,includinginformationthatcoachesareexpectedtobringtoteachers.ThemodelisthatcoacheslearntogetherinthecoachesCPTandthentheyfacilitatelearningandfollow-upwithteachersinthecontentCPT.Forexample,inacoachesCPTobservedbytheevaluators,thefocuswasassessingthelearningtargetinalesson;andthenlaterthatweek,evaluatorsobservedcontentCPTsthathadassessinglearningtargetsasanagendaitem.Administratorssharedthattherefinedteacherleadershipmodelbuildsdistributedleadership,buildsthecapacityofteachers,andbuildsacultureofcoachingintheschool.

Evaluatorsobservedmanyofthestrengthsandimprovementsoftheteacherleadershipmodeldescribedabove.Theyalsoobservedandheardaboutanumberofongoingornewchallengeswiththemodel.Oneofthekeychallengesmaybethattherearemanyexpectationsofcoaches,notjusttocoachandsupportteachers,buttobringmessages,supporttesting,supportimplementationofspecificinitiativessuchasManagingtheActiveClassroom,anddevelopnewcourses.Theseareallimportant,andcoachessharedthattheydonotknowwhetherthesewouldhappenifnotwiththecoaches,butthecoachesaredefinitelysqueezedfortimewithalloftheseexpectations,andthereissomeconcernthattimespentcoachingteacherscouldbejeopardized.Onarelatednote,teacherssharedthatthereisatensionbetweenadministrators’viewsoftheirrolesandthatoftheURcoachleader,withadministratorshavingbroadexpectationsandtheURcoachleaderbelievingthatthecoaches’solefocusshouldbecoachingcyclesandthatCPTshouldbefocusedonthecoachingcycle.

Additionalchallengesabouttheteacherleadermodelincludethatwhileallcontentareashavecoaches,thereisnocoachforspecialeducationteachersorforEnglishNewLanguageteachers.Anothertensionisunderstandingorclarifyingtheexpectationsbetweenteacherleadersandadministrators,especiallyrelatedtoteacherperformance.Coachesarenon-evaluativesupportsforteachers,andadministratorsareevaluativesupports.Somecoachessharedthatadministratorswilloccasionallyaskfortheiropinionaboutissuestheymayobserveintheirteacherevaluations.Finally,asmentionedabove,thereissomevariabilityintheperceivedqualityofcoaches.

Fromtheevaluators’perspective,thecoachroleisintegraltotheEastEPOmodelandimportantforensuringconsistencyandongoingsupportforalloftheprofessionaldevelopmentinitiatives.Evaluatorsobservedincreaseduseofcommonlanguage,greaterconsistencyincontentareaCPTmeetings,andthatteachersgenerallyvaluethecoaches’support.Theteacherleaderisthepieceofthemodelthatadministratorswouldsayiscriticaltoreplication.

Page 32: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–26–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

“Theteacherleadermodeliscriticalandreplicable.Anddirectlyrelatedtoschedule.Peopledon’tgetthepowerofschedulesrelativetoimpact.”

“TeacherleadersthatareofficiallyassignedasteacherleadersandcoacheshavereallydoneastupendousjobofrunningourCPTsandalsosharingsomeprofessionallearningonaroutinebasiswiththosegroups.Ithinkthey’vebeeninstrumentalinpushingthemissionforward.”

Assessment:CommonFormativeAssessmentsandEmbeddedPerformanceAssessmentsAssessmenthasalsobeenafocusofprofessionaldevelopmentandpracticethisyear.Specifically,Year2focusedonthedevelopmentanduseofCommonFormativeAssessments(CFAs)andembeddedperformanceassessmentsinallgradesanddisciplines.Tomany,CFAsandperformanceassessmentsfeltlikesomethingnewandanadd-ontoteachers,whowerenotquitesureiftheseadditionalassessmentswereworththeeffort.

TheCFAsweredevelopedbygrade-levelcontentteams,sothatallclassesofthesamecontentandgradelevelgavethesameformativeassessment.ThesameCFAwasgiveneveryeightweekstomonitortheprogressofstudents.Teacherscollaborativelydevelopedtheassessmentsandtherubrics,withsuperintendentconferencedaysandCPTtimedevotedtoCFAandperformanceassessments.SometeachersreportedfrustrationwithCFAsastheyfeltliketheywereconstantlyrevisingthem.ThismaybebecauseadministratorsandteacherleaderswerelearninghowtodoCFAsatthesametimeasteachers.AnotherconcernwithCFAsisthatsomespecialeducationteacherssharedtheyfeltspecialeducationstudentswerenotconsideredindevelopingtheCFAs.AnotherteachersharedthatCFAsdonotaddvaluewhenateacherpracticescontinuousformativeassessment.OtherteachersworriedabouttheamountoftimeittakesforstudentstotaketheCFA;sincemostoftheminvolvesignificantwriting,theseteachersfeltliketheywerelosinginstructionaltime.AfewotherssharedthattheCFAdataisusefultoseestudentgrowthovertimeandtovalidateateacher’s“feeling”abouthowastudentisdoing,andtopostCFAssostudentscanseetheirowngrowth.

TeacherswerealsoaskedaboutCFAsandtheembeddedperformanceassessmentsintheteacher/staffsurvey.ThesurveydataindicatemixedresultsabouttheusefulnessoftheCFAsforinfluencingteacherpractice.Figure17showsthat62percentofLowerand46percentofUpperSchoolteacherssaidinformationfromtheCFAsinfluencedtheirteaching“tosomeoragreatextent.”Withregardtotheembeddedperformanceassessments,theperceivedusefulnessofthatdataforinformingteacherpracticewasvariedbetweentheUpperandLowerschools,with50percentofteachersattheUpperSchooland66percentofthoseattheLowerSchoolreportingthatinformationfromtheassessmentinfluencestheirteachingtosomeoragreatextent(seeFigure18).

Page 33: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–27–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

Figure17.ExtentteachersbelieveinformationfromtheCommonFormativeAssessmentsinfluencedtheirteaching

Note:Includesresponsesofteachersandteacherleadersonly.

Figure18.Extentteachersbelievedatafromtheembeddedperformanceassessmentinfluencedtheirteaching

Note:Includesresponsesofteachersandteacherleadersonly.

TheuseofCFAsandperformanceassessmentsacrossallgradesandsubjectswasnewthisyear.Itwillbeinterestingtoseehowtheassessmentsandtheirusechangeovertime.Teacherscangetfrustratedwhenitfeelsliketheyarenotsureofthedestinationandperhapswishthatsomeonewouldjusttellthemhowtodoit.However,administratorsseegreatvalueinthejourneyandstruggleofCFAdevelopmentininformingteachers’teachingandassessmentpractices.Forexample,byworking

18%

31%

13%

34%

31%

33%

35%

28%

39%

10%

8%

12%

3%

3%

3%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Total

LowerSchool

UpperSchool

PercentofRespondents(Totaln=138)

Toagreatextent-4 3 2 Notatall-1 Don'tknow

17%

29%

12%

39%

37%

38%

20%

13%

23%

13%

8%

16%

11%

13%

11%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Total

LowerSchool

UpperSchool

PercentofRespondents(Totaln=137)

Toagreatextent-4 3 2 Notatall-1 Don'tknow

Page 34: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–28–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

togethertodeveloptheassessmentandthegradingrubric,teachersandteacherleadersareengagingindeepconversationsanddebateaboutthestandards,howtomeasuretheachievementofthem,whatthescaleofarubricmeans,andhowtodefinerigor.

TeacherPracticesOneofthemaingoalsoftheEPOistotransformteachingandthusacceleratestudentlearning.Tosupportthetransformationofteaching,extensiveprofessionallearninghasbeenprovidedtoteachers,andincludesCPTandprofessionallearningthroughouttheschoolyear.Additionally,administratorsareconductingmorefrequentwalkthroughsofclassroomsandprovidingimmediatefeedbackviaaGoogleformonwhatwasobserved.Administratorsarestartingtoseechangesinteacherpracticesingeneral.Onenoted,“Teachingpracticesfromstartofyeartonow,whatI’veseenareteachersingeneral–themajority–areverywillingtoworkwithcoachesandadministratorstoimprovetheirpractice.”

EvaluatorsconductedsystematicclassroomobservationsofasampleofclassroomsintheUpperandLowerSchoolsinMay2016andagainin2017toobserveteacherpracticesandassesschangeovertime.Evaluatorsworkedwithanobservationtooldevelopedspecificallyforthisevaluation(seeAppendixA)tomeasureandassesssomeofthekeyteacherpracticesthatadministratorsandschoolleadersarefocusingontoimprovepractices.AcrossthreedaysinApril2017,atotalof54classroomswereobserved.Thirty-sevenpercentoftheclassroomsobservedweregrades6–8and61percentoftheclassroomsobservedwereattheUpperSchool.Thereasonclassroomgradeswerereportedas“mixed”wasbecausemanyoftheUpperSchoolclassesthatwereobservedcontainedmixedgradelevels.

EvaluatorswereaskedtoindicatetheUnderstandingbyDesign(UbD)levelsobserved.Observerscouldcheckmultipleboxes(acquisition,meaningmaking,transfer).Inonlytwoclassrooms,studentswerebeingaskedto“transfer,”thehighestlevel,theirunderstandingtosomethingnewanddifferent.In34classrooms,studentswerebeingaskedto“makemeaning”oftheirlearning,andin16classrooms,studentswereacquiringnewknowledge.In2016,evaluatorsobservedsevenclassroomswherestudentswerebeingaskedto“transfer”theirlearning,andin18classrooms,theywere“makingmeaning.”Whilethiscomparisonnotesthattherewerefewerstudentsbeingaskedto“transfer”theirunderstanding,therewasasignificantincreaseinthenumberofstudents“makingmeaning”thisyear.

Evaluatorswerealsoaskedtonotewhattypeofcontentinstructionwasobserved.Contentinstructionwasobservedin48outof54classrooms.In62percentoftheclassrooms(30),thecontentwasbeingconnectedtopreviouslearning,anincreaseofabout10percentfrom2016.

In56percentoftheclassrooms,studentswerebeingaskedtomakeconnectionsbetweendifferentideas,concepts,ortopics.In54percentoftheclassrooms,studentswereacquiringknowledgeorskillsthroughpracticeorexercise,organizingknowledge,ordeepprocessing.Inthepreviousyear,just30percentoftheclassroomswereobservedengagingstudentsindeepprocessing.

In41percentoftheclassrooms,studentsweremakingmeaningofthecontentprocessesbymakinginferences,generalizing,categorizing,drawingconclusions,developinghypotheses,citingevidence,oranalyzingperspectives.Andlastly,in10percentoftheclassroomsstudentswereobservedtransferring

Page 35: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–29–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

understandingtonewsituations.Thisisanewcategoryandthereforecannotbecomparedtothepreviousyear.

AsinYear1,evaluatorsnotedatleastsixtimesthatnocontentinstructionwasobservedduringtheirclassroomvisit.Intwoinstances,observersnotedthatstudentsweresimplyfollowingstep-by-stepinstructionswithnoquestionsbeingasked,nohigherorderthinkingbeingneeded,andnostudentdiscourseonatopicbeingobserved.Inaddition,whilecontentinstructionmayhavebeenobserved,observersnotedonseveraloccasionsthatthecontentwasnotdifferentiated,andnoscaffoldsorsupportswereofferedtohelpEnglishlearnerorstudentswithdisabilitiesaccessthecontent.

Evaluatorsalsocollecteddataonwhethertherewasevidenceofteachersusingthetechniqueofgradualreleaseofresponsibility,whichincludesmodeling,guidedpractice,and/orindependentpractice.In68percentoftheclassrooms,evaluatorsindicatedthatagradualmodelofreleasewasbeingused(Y/Nquestion).Theywerealsoaskedtoidentifywhatphaseofthemodeltheyobserved.Themostfrequentphasethatwasobservedwastheteacherprovidingguidedpracticetothewholeclass(31classrooms).Thenexthighestwasindependentpractice(24classrooms),engagementinguidedpracticewithstudentcollaboration(21classrooms),andlastly,theteachermodelingforthewholeclass(18classrooms).

Uponcloserexaminationofthedata,itappearsthatmanyclassroomswerenotactuallyengagedinagradualreleaseofresponsibility.Thedataindicatesthatteacherswerelargelypresentingtothestudents(teachermodelingorprovidingguidedpracticetothewholeclass)andthenexpectingstudentstoattempttodotheworkindependently.Thisissupportedbyadditionaldatathatshowedthatin76percentoftheclassrooms,studentswereparticipatinginteacher-directedquestionsandanswers(teachermodelingandteacherprovidingguidedpractice),butthatin46percentoftheclassrooms,studentsengagedonlyindiscoursewithotherstudentsontherelatedtopic(guidedpracticewithstudentcollaboration).Otheractivitiesthatwereobservedinclude:

• Pursuinganinquiryorresearchingaquestionwitharangeofoptionsfordirectiontopursue(24%)

• Readingorwritingcomplextext(46%)

• Askingorbeingaskedquestionsbeyondtheliterallevel(22%)

• Engaginginappropriatedebate,argument,ordisagreementwithpeersand/orteacher(24%)

• Usinghigher-orderthinkingandthenapplyingittoaproblem,findingasolution,orsolvingaproblem(32%)

Theseobservationsaresimilartodatacollectedinthepreviousyear.Itappearsthatscholarshavefewopportunitiestohavetheconceptmodeledandevenfeweropportunitiestoworkcollaboratively.Verylittleguidedpracticeisbeingoffered,asteacherswereobservedmostlyexplainingtheconcept(orgivinginstructions)andthenaskingstudentstomoveimmediatelytoindependentpractice.

Inthequalitativedatacollected,effectivepracticesfordeliberateinstructionthatwereobservedincluded:usinga“hook”toengagethestudentsintheirlearning;adeliberatefocusonvocabulary;

Page 36: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–30–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

evidenceofquestionsbeingaskedbytheteacheratdifferentlevelsofBloom’staxonomy;andmultipleusesofprotocols,suchasfishbowl,carousel,and“momentofsilence.”

Qualitativedataalsosupportsminimaluseofagradualrelease-of-responsibilitymodel.Evaluatorsnotedstudentsengagedinmakingmeaningoftheirlearning,butfoundfewexampleswherestudentsweredeliberatelytoldtoengageasagrouporpairtodiscusstherelatedtopic.Teacherswereobservedmodelingconceptsortasks,butnotaskingquestionsorprovidingguidedpractice.

CurriculumYear1andthesummerbeforeYear2involvedsignificantcurriculum-writingwork,witheveryteacherhavingfivedaysofsummerprofessionallearningtimetoworkwiththeirdepartmentoncurriculumdevelopment.Agoalofthecurriculumworkwasthedevelopmentofarigorous,coherent,andstandards-basedcurriculum.Schooladministratorsareinterestedintheextentofcurriculumimplementation.Evaluatorsaskedteachers,teacherleaders,andadministratorsaboutcurriculumininterviewsandfocusgroups;additionally,someofthesurveyitemsalsoaskedaboutthecurriculum.Evaluatorsobservedforteachingpracticesbutdidnotobserveforcurriculumimplementation.

Teachersandteacherleaderswereaskedonthesurveytoindicatetheextenttowhichtheyareimplementingthecurriculumasdesigned.WhileamajorityofteachersattheLowerSchool(81%)andUpperSchool(72%)indicatedthattheyareimplementingthecurriculumasdesigned“tosomeoragreatextent,”administratorsmaydesirethesepercentagestobehigher(seeFigure19).Thesefindingssuggestthatadministratorsmaywanttoascertainwhatiskeepingteachersfromimplementingthecurriculumwithgreaterfidelitytoseewhatcanbedonetostrengthenimplementation.

Figure19.Extenttowhichyouimplementthecurriculumasdesigned

31%

36%

23%

49%

45%

49%

17%

7%

21%

2%

5%

2%

1%

7%

5%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Total

LowerSchool

UpperSchool

PercentofRespondents(Totaln=138)

Toagreatextent-4 3 2 Notatall-1 Don'tknow

Page 37: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–31–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

Note:Includesresponsesofteachersandteacherleadersonly.

Teachersandteacherleaderswerealsoaskedtheextenttowhichtheyperceivethecurriculumtoberigorous(seeFigure20)andculturallyrelevant(seeFigure21).ThevastmajorityofteachersattheLowerSchool(91%)andUpperSchool(84%)whorespondedtothesurveybelievethecurriculumisrigorous“tosomeoragreatextent.”Statementsfromteachersduringthefocusgroupsgenerallyalignwiththesurveyresults,thoughafewreportedthecurriculumtobelessrigorousthanthesurroundingsuburbandistricts.AhigherpercentageofteachersattheLowerSchool(67%)indicatedtosomeoragreatextentthatthecurriculumisculturallyrelevanttostudents,whereasonly47percentofteachersattheUpperSchooldidso.

Figure20.Extentteachersbelievethecurriculumisrigorous

Note:Includesresponsesofteachersandteacherleadersonly.

36%

42%

28%

54%

49%

56%

9%

7%

10%

1%

2%

2%

3%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Total

LowerSchool

UpperSchool

PercentofRespondents(Totaln=138)

Toagreatextent-4 3 2 Notatall-1 Don'tknow

Page 38: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–32–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

Figure21.Extentteachersbelievethecurriculumisculturallyrelevanttostudents

Note:Includesresponsesofteachersandteacherleadersonly.

SupportRoomModelTheEPO’sSupportRoommodelprovidesadedicatedclassperiodforstudentstoreceiveassistanceandtomakeupwork.AllstudentsattheUpperSchoolarescheduledintoSupport,andattheLowerSchoolstudentsarescheduledinasneeded.SupportisviewedbyEaststaffandEPOleadersascriticaltothesuccessoftheturnaroundefforts.Duringthefirstyearofimplementation,earlyroadblocksorchallengesincludedinconsistentstudentattendance,unclearrolesandresponsibilitiesforSupportRoomteachers,andlackofcoordinationbetweenSupportRoomteachersandcontentteachersaboutstudentwork.BytheendofYear1,agroupofspecialeducationteacherswhohadworkedintheUpperSchoolSupportRoomsproposedrevisionstotheSupportRoommodeltoenhanceitsefficiencyandeffectiveness,includingmovingtheSupportRoomssothattheyaregroupedtogether,appointingaSupportRoomcoordinator,anddevelopingasystemfortrackingstudentwork.AllofthesechangesandmorewereimplementedforYear2beginninginSeptember2016,anddatacollectedfromteachers,teacherleaders,principals,andadministratorsshowprogresshasbeenmade,especiallyinUpperSchoolSupportRooms.

ALowerSchoolSupportRoomCommitteealsoaddressedsomechallengesinYear2,andiscurrentlydesigningfurtherimprovementstobeimplementedinSeptember2017.Asoneleadernoted,theeffectivenessofSupportRoomsvaries:

“Some[supportrooms]arereallygreat–andsomearenot.Weneedtohelppeopleunderstandhowthemodelworks–whatitlookslike–anditchangeseveryperiod–it’samodelwebelievein,andwithcontinueduse,itwillbesuccessful.”

20%

29%

13%

35%

38%

34%

37%

27%

39%

7%

4%

9%

1%

2%

5%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Total

LowerSchool

UpperSchool

PercentofRespondents(Totaln=138)

Toagreatextent-4 3 2 Notatall-1 Don'tknow

Page 39: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–33–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

FindingsaboutSupportRoomsarebasedoninterviewswithschoolleaders;focusgroupswithteachers,counselors,socialworkers,andstudents;observationsbyevaluators;andresponsesfromstudentandstaffsurveys.

BenefitsofSupportRoomModel

Teachers,counselors,administrators,andevenstudentssharedtheperspectivethatSupportisbeneficialtostudentsingeneral.Ithelpsstudentscatchuponworkandprovidesopportunitiestolearnmaterialtheymightbestrugglingwith.SomeadministratorsbelieveSupportisespeciallybeneficialtoENLandspecialeducationstudentstoprovidethemwithsmallgrouporindividualizedattention,thoughnotallteacherssharedtheperspectivethatENLandspecialeducationstudentswerewellservedinSupport.UpperSchoolSupportwasdescribedaswell-functioninginwaysthatbenefitstudentsbecausecontentteachersandSupportteachersarecommunicatingandsharinginformationtomakestudenttimeinSupportbeproductive.TheSupportRoommanagersattheUpperSchoolkeepthingsrunningsmoothly.ThereismorecoordinationofstudentmaterialattheLowerSchoolaswell.TeachersandadministratorsremarkedthatmoststudentsappeartobetakingSupportseriouslyandmostareworkingwheninSupport.Supportisalsoanotherareawherepositiveadult-studentrelationshipscanbeformedbecausetheSupportteachersareseenashelpfulandthetimeislessstructured,sothereismoreinformalinteractionbetweenteachersandstudents.

Eightyteachersrespondedtoanopen-endedquestionontheteacher/staffsurveyaskingwhatwasmosteffectiveaboutSupportRoomsthisyear.Ofthosewhoanswered,68providedpositivecomments.TeachersdescribedimprovementsmadetoSupportRoomsbeginninginSeptember2017thathadenhancedthemodel,especiallyinUpperSchool,suchas:

• ManagersofeachSupportRoom[attheUpperSchool]workwithclassroomcontentteacherstoensureteachersandstudentshaveworktodotogetherinSupport.

• TheavailabilityandaccessibilityofcontentteachersandassignmentsforstudentshaveincreasedinSupportRooms.

• EnhancementshavebeenmadeintrackingscholarprogressandprovidingwhatstudentsneedinSupportRooms.

• TheSupportRoomatmosphereishelpfulinbuildingrelationshipsandasenseofcommunityamongteachersandstudents.

• TheSupportRoomismorethanjusthelpwithhomeworkthisyear.

Infocusgroups,teacherssharedthefollowingevidenceaboutthebenefitsofSupport:

“Studentswhousethetimetocompletework,studyand/or[get]assistanceofcontentareastaffaretrulybenefittingfromtheSupportModel.”

“I'vegottentoworkveryextensivelywithasmallgroupofstudentswhichhasstrengthenedourrelationshipsanddefinitelyhelpedtheiracademicsuccessaswell.”

Page 40: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–34–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

“SupportisamazingandtheorganizationalchangesmadethisyeartostreamlineitattheUpperSchoolhavemadeahugedifference.AlignmentbetweenContentteachersandSupportRoomteachershasimprovedthisyear.”

CounselorsmentionedduringafocusgroupthatstudentsaremorewillingthanlastyeartogotoSupportRoomforextrahelp.“Scholarshavesettleddown,theyhavestartedtoseethebenefit,andsomeareaskingforitnow.”Counselorsalsonoted“arealsynergy”amongSupportRoomteachersandclassroomteachers,describingastrategyandasystemthathasdevelopedwhichhasstudentsaskingtogointoSupporttocatchupandmakeup.Ontheteacher/staffsurvey,amajorityofteachersatboththeLowerSchool(72%)andUpperSchool(86%)agreetosomeoragreatextentthat“SupportPeriodhasthepotentialtopositivelyimpactstudentoutcomes”(seeFigure22).However,alowerpercentageofteachersagreetosomeoragreatextentthat“moststudentsareabletostrengthenand/oracquireneededskillsthroughSupport,”withonly32percentofLowerSchoolteachersand65percentofUpperSchoolteachersagreeing(seeFigure23).

Figure22.ExtentteachersbelieveSupportPeriodhasthepotentialtopositivelyimpactstudentoutcomes

Note:Includesresponsesofteachersandteacherleadersonly.

Ininterviews,administratorsverifiedtheprogressmade,especiallyinUpperSchoolSupportRooms.Oneadministratornoted:“Supportisfar,farbetterthanlastyear.We’vestartedtrackingstudentsandnowwe’redifferentiatingthosesupportstolookatwhatkidsinwhatroomshavewhatexamscomingup.”Studentsarebeinggroupedwithcontentteachersbasedonupcomingassessments,andthefocusismuchmoretargetedtothesupportthosestudentsneed.Inaddition,duringafocusgroup,viceprincipalsnotedSupportisbeingusedforsmall-groupinstructionandkeepingstudentsontrackwiththeirgrades.“WheneverIdoSupportRoomwalkthroughs,Iseekidsaskingwheretheyare[and]whattheyneedtodotobesuccessful.Iseethemtakingmoreadvantageofinstructionintherethisyearthan

54%

56%

60%

25%

16%

26%

9%

16%

5%

2%

2%

2%

9%

11%

7%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Total

LowerSchool

UpperSchool

PercentofRespondents(Totaln=137)Toagreatextent-4 3 2 Notatall-1 Don'tknow

Page 41: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–35–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

theydidlastyear.”ByusingtheresultsofRegentsexams,SupportRoomteachersarefocusingonsmallgroupstoprepthemforthenextsetofexams.OneschoolleadersharedthatteachersandstudentshavebeenheldmoreaccountablefortheirrolesinSupportthisyear,andstressedthatimprovementshavebeenteacherled.

AccordingtooneLowerSchooladministrator,mostspecialeducationandEnglishlearnerstudentsarescheduledintoSupportperiod:“Insupportrooms,therearespecialeducationteachersspecificallyassignedthatcansupportstudentsintheirIEPgoals.”TheLowerSchoolalsoprovidesabilingualSupportRoomthatisstaffedwithabilingualteacherorparaprofessional.ENLteachersandspecialeducationteachersworkinSupportRoomsandusemodificationsasneeded.Typically,thosemodificationsarenotonlyintheinterestofthosestudentsbutcanbeusedforallstudents.

Figure23.Extentteachersbelievestudentsareabletostrengthenand/oracquireneededskillsthroughSupportperiod

Note:Includesresponsesofteachersandteacherleadersonly.

UpperSchoolstudentfeedbackindicatesattendanceatSupporthasrisenthisyearasmorestudentsarebuyingintothemodelandunderstandingthevalueofextrasupportastheyworktosuccessfullygraduatefromhighschool.StudentsinSupport,atboththeUpperandLowerSchools,valueSupportandseeitasimportanttotheirsuccess.OntheUpperSchoolstudentsurvey,86percentofthestudents(296)indicatedthattheywerescheduledinSupport.OfthoseUpperSchoolstudentsscheduledinSupport,92percentagreedorstronglyagreedwiththestatement:“Supportperiodhelpsmedobetterinmyclasses,”andonly7percentdisagreedorstronglydisagreedwiththestatement(seeFigure24).ThevastmajorityofUpperSchoolstudentsinSupport(89%)alsoagreedorstronglyagreedwiththestatement:“Supporthelpstokeepmeontracktograduation”,whereas11%disagreedorstronglydisagreed.UpperSchoolstudentsinfocusgroupssharedbenefitsaswell.InaQuestfocusgroup,studentsacknowledgedhavingSupportRoomorgettingextrahelpduringlunchorstayingafterschool:

22%

9%

29%

31%

23%

36%

28%

34%

22%

7%

16%

3%

12%

18%

10%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Total

LowerSchool

UpperSchool

PercentofRespondents(Totaln=137)

Toagreatextent-4 3 2 Notatall-1 Don'tknow

Page 42: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–36–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

“Youcandoyourhomeworkinthereoranyworkthatyou’remissing.Ithelpsusgetourworkdone.”

LowerSchoolstudentswerealsoaskedaboutSupportontheirstudentsurvey,with94percentoftherespondentsindicatingtheywerescheduledinSupportthisyear.Figure24showsthat95percentoftheLowerSchoolstudentsinSupportindicatedtheyagreeorstronglyagreewiththestatement“Supportperiodhelpsmedobetterinmyclasses.”

Figure24.Extentstudentsbelievesupportperiodhelpsthemdobetterintheirclasses.

ChallengeswithSupportTeachers,students,andadministratorssharedsomechallengeswiththeimplementationofSupportthatcouldlimititsimpact.ThechallengeswerepredominantlyinreferencetoSupportattheLowerSchool.Thechallengesidentifiedinclude:

• Studentbehaviors,includingstudentsusingSupportforhomework,inconsistentattendance,andcellphoneuse

• CommunicationaboutbothstudentandteacherexpectationsinSupport

• NeedforsystemsandprocessesattheLowerSchooltotrackprogress,

• NeedforsupportforENLandspecialeducationstudents

• ParaprofessionalpreparationforSupport

• NeedforSupportcoordinatorattheLowerSchool

Infocusgroupsandonthesurvey,teachersindicatedthatsomestudentsuseSupportpredominantlyforhomeworkcatch-upratherthansupportfortheircontentareaweaknesses.Otherteachers,however,believethatcompletinghomeworkhelpsstudentswithcontent.Teachersalsonotedthatstudentsare

48%

53%

44%

42%

5%

5%

2%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

UpperSchool

LowerSchool

PercentofRespondents

StronglyAgree Agree Disagree StronglyDisagree

Page 43: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–37–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

stilloftendistractedbycellphoneuseinSupport,andotherssharedthatattendance,whileimprovedfromlastyear,isinconsistent.Thefollowingquotationsfromteacherfocusgroupsandopen-endedsurveyresponsesillustratesomeofthesechallengesrelatedtostudentbehavior:

“Forsomestudents,Supportcontinuestobeafreeperiodandtheproblemistheconstantuseofphone.”

“Moststudentssawthetimeashomeworktimeandwererefusingservices,suchaslanguagedivesandspecificcontentareawork.”

“ScholarsthinkSupportisforhomeworkandnotforstrengtheningskills.”

MostchallengesmentionedrelatetoLowerSchoolSupportRooms.LowerSchooladministratorssharedthatSupportisstillconsideredaworkinprogress,andfurtheradjustmentsareplannedfornextyear.TeachersmentionedthatcommunicationsaboutthepurposesandexpectationsforSupporthavenotbeenconsistentfromadministrators.TheyalsosharedtheneedforimprovedsystemsandprocessesattheLowerSchool.OneadministratornotedabouttheLowerSchool:

“WearealsolookingathowwesupportinterventionforLiteracyinSupportRoomssostudentscangetthatbecauseitdefinitelyisaddingtothevalue.[We’ve]madealotofchangesbecausewe’restilltryingtofigureoutwhatwillwork…empoweringteacherstofigureitout.Supportlooksdifferentacrossdifferentsupportperiods.”

ThattheroleofSupportteachersisunclearattheLowerSchoolandthatthereneedstobemorecoordinationbetweencontentareateachersandSupportRoomteachersisevidentinresultsfromtheteacher/staffsurveyaswellasfocusgroupsandinterviews.Figure25showsthatonly31percentofLowerSchoolteachersagreedtosomeoragreatextentthattheroleofSupportRoomteachersisclear,with56percentagreeingthattheirroleissomewhatornotatallclear,comparedto74percentofUpperSchoolteachersagreeingtosomeoragreatextentthattheroleofSupportRoomteachersisclear.TherewerenoSupportRoommanagersatLowerSchoolSupportRoomsthisyear,andtheneedforthosebecameevident.Figure26showsthatLowerSchoolteachersratedthecollaborationofandcoordinationbetweencontentteachersandSupportteacherslow.Only27percentofLowerSchoolteachersratedthatcoordinationandcollaboration“happenedtosomeoragreatextent,”comparedto60percentoftheUpperSchoolteachers.Nextyeartheplansincludehavingtwoteachers—oneforgrades6and7andoneforgrade8,assignedasthego-topersonintheSupportRoom.

Inafocusgroupwithparaprofessionals,theysharedthatwhilethechangestoSupportinYear2includedmanyimprovements,itbroughtthenewchallengeofhowtheysupportstudentsinSupportRoom.TheysharedthatsomeparaprofessionalsarenowscheduledonlyinSupportRoomsandareneverincontentrooms.Thisisachallengebecausetheydonothearhowateacherexplainsorwantssomethingdone,andthiscanimpedetheireffortstoprovidehigh-qualitysupporttostudents.

Page 44: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–38–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

Figure25.ExtentteachersbelievetheroleofSupportRoomteachersisclear

Note:Includesresponsesofteachersandteacherleadersonly.

Figure26.ExtentteachersbelievecontentteachersandSupportRoomteacherscollaborateandcoordinateSupportRoomefforts

Note:Includesresponsesofteachersandteacherleadersonly.

Effortsarebeingmadetoaddresschallenges,andthesewereverifiedthroughobservationsandfeedback.AnevaluatorobservedaCPTsessionwhereteacherswereworkingonimprovingthestatusof8thgradeSupportRoomsbyassigningroommanagersandcreatingarotatingschedule.Thefollowing

30%

7%

40%

31%

24%

34%

17%

29%

10%

12%

27%

7%

9%

13%

10%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Total

LowerSchool

UpperSchool

PercentofRespondents(Totaln=138)

Toagreatextent-4 3 2 Notatall-1 Don'tknow

17%

7%

22%

34%

20%

38%

26%

47%

17%

9%

13%

6%

15%

13%

16%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Total

LowerSchool

UpperSchool

PercentofRespondents(Totaln=137)

Toagreatextent-4 3 2 Notatall-1 Don'tknow

Page 45: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–39–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

quotationsfromteachersindicatesomeofthechallenges,andincludesomesuggestionsforimprovementsfromfocusgroupsandsurveyresponses:

“TheSupportRoomhasthepotentialtobeeffectivebutitisnotrightnow.Itisdifferentateverygradelevel,thereisnoconsistency,andtheexpectationswerenotclearinthebeginningoftheyearandhavechangedseveraltimesoverthecourseoftheyear.LiteracyteachersshouldnotbeassignedtoaSupportRoomifLiteracyinterventionistheintent.Itneedstobedoneinsmallgroups,inaseparateroom.”

“NotallteachersareactivelyinvolvedinteachingSupport.ManyteachersusetheirtimeinSupporttoplanfortheirclasses,anddotheirindividualworkratherthanengagingwithstudents.Therearealsoteacherswhowillnotworkwithstudentstheydonotteach.”

“Supportatthe8thgradelevelhasnotbeeneffectivethisyear.ThelackofteacherownershipoverSupporthasbeenahugebarrier.TeachersstartedtheyearwithnocommunicationaboutexpectationsforSupportfromadministrators.Effectivesystemswerenotsetupatthebeginningoftheschoolyearandbeneficialroutineswerenotestablished.ThiskilledSupportbeforeitevenhadachancetobesuccessful.Inordertobesuccessful,SupportshouldmirrortheUpperSchoolSupportRoomsandthereneedstobefull-timededicatedteacherswhoareresponsibleforcoordinatingtheactivitiesintherooms.”

FreshmanAcademyFreshmanAcademy(FA)isEast’sspecializedacademicprogram—designedwitharangeofspecialfeatures,socio-emotionalsupports,anditsowndedicatedphysicalspace—tosupportfirst-time9thgraders’successfultransitionfrommiddleschooltohighschool.LedbyanAcademydirectorandviceprincipal(underthesupervisionoftheUpperSchoolprincipal),theAcademy’sspecialfeaturesincludeFA-specificsupportstaff(twoguidancecounselorsandasocialworker),personaladvocatesforevery9thgradescholar(HOMESadvocates,providedincollaborationwiththelocalcommunityorganizationHillside),IDCPTandacademicandsocio-emotionalwellnessprogressmonitoringintheformofregularacademicperformance,intervention,andattendancemeetings.

Year1ofimplementationsawFreshmanAcademyachieveaseriesofsuccesses.Thedevelopmentofacultureofinclusionandsupportwasattributedtothedecisiontoseparate9thgradersfromupperclassmen,lowstudent-to-adultratiosthroughoutFA,thecohesiveteamstaffbuiltthroughgrade-wideIDCPTmeetings,additionalweeklyopportunitiestodiscussstudentneeds,andHOMESadvocates’tirelesssupportoffreshmanscholars.Year1academicsuccessesincludedan85%dailyattendanceratefornew9thgraders,increasedcreditsearned,andanincreasedpromotionrate.

FreshmanAcademyalsoexperienceditsshareofchallengesinYear1.Ninthgradescholars’attendancewasoftenthelowestinthebuilding.Chaotichallwaysandpoorbehavioronthepartofsomescholarspresentedafrequentobstacle.WhileFA’sseparatephysicalspaceandactivitieswereintendedto

Page 46: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–40–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

provideanintimate“schoolwithinaschool”atmosphere,somefreshmenfeltisolatedfromupperclassmen.Teachersandadministratorsidentifiedaneedtoimprovestudentprogresstracking,follow-upwithregardtostudents’non-academicneeds,andcommunicationamongstalloftheadultsworkingtosupportascholar.Leadershipcontinuityalsoprovedelusive,astheAcademy’sfoundingdirectortransitionedoutoftheschoolduringthespringsemester,andtheUpperSchoolatlargeunderwentaleadershiptransitionmidwaythroughYear1.

TherefinementsthatwereplannedtoaddresssomeofthesechallengesinYear2extendedbeyondFreshmanAcademy.Forexample,aschool-widecodeofconduct/behaviorpolicywasadopted,andfacultyandadministratorswerehopefulthispolicywouldhelpquellsomeofthehallwayhubbubandbehaviorissues.AmodificationinthewayFamilyGroupwasorganized(discussedelsewhereinthisreport)partiallyaddressed9thgradeisolationfromupperclassmenbyintegratingfreshmenintoupperclassmenFamilyGroups.ChangesandrefinementsmorespecifictoFAincluded:

• Newleadershipinboththedirectorandviceprincipalroles

• IncreasedeffortstoanalyzeattendancebyperiodanduseoftheresultinginformationtoenhancetheFreshmanAcademylearningenvironment

• Streamlinedeffortstomakestudentdatamoreaccessibleanduserfriendlyforscholars,theirfamilies,andteachers

FreshmanAcademyModificationsFreshmanAcademyfocusedonasetofthreecentralgoalsfor9thgradescholarsaroundwhichmoststaffeffortsrevolved.Thosegoals—thatatleast80percentof9thgraderswouldearn5.5creditsandpasstwoRegentsexams,atleast80percentof9thgraderswouldbepromotedtothe10thgrade,and9thgraderswouldachieveanaveragedailyattendancerateof85percentorhigher—informedrefinementstoFA’sYear2approach.

InYear1,FreshmanAcademymeteveryotherdayforfullstaffmeetings(IDCPT)whosepurposewastocontributetothescholarinterventionprocess,academicprogressmonitoringwithadatawall(basedondatarefreshedeverythreeweeks),socio-emotionalwellness,andprofessionallearningforfaculty.Inaddition,FAadministratorsattendedweeklyattendancemeetingsthatincludedFA’sguidancecounselors,socialworker,andHOMESadvocates.Inaddition,FAadministratorsattendedaweeklycultureandclimatemeetingmeanttosupportthedevelopmentofawarm,positive,collegial,andstudent-empoweringAcademyculture.

InYear2,FAmeetingswerestreamlined.IDCPTmeetingfrequencywasreducedtoonceeveryfourdays,resultinginonemeetingperweekonaverage,anddiscussionalternatedbetweeninstructionalpracticesandindividualstudentdataanalysis.Theyear-longfocusoftheinstructionalpracticemeetingswastoexaminethewayinformationistransitionedandtosharebestpractices,from8thto9thgradeandfrom9thto10thgrade,inordertofindwaystosmooththeprocess.Year2alsosawanincreaseinthefrequencyoftheprogressmonitoringthatinformstheweeklyindividualstudentdataanalysismeetings—withstudentdatacurrentlyrefreshedeverytwoweeksinsteadofeverythreeweeksaswasformerlythecase.

Page 47: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–41–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

Proceedingwiththepushtobothstreamlineaccesstostudentdataandimprovefollow-up,FAcreatedaGoogledatabasetotrackclassroom-levelinterventionsforattendanceandotheracademicprogressmonitoring.ThedatabaseisregularlyupdatedbyteachersduringCPTforusebyFAadministratorswhorelyontheinformationtoinforminterventiondiscussionswiththesocialworker,counselors,HOMESadvocates,andspecialeducationteachersthatsupport9thgradescholars.

Mirroringanewsupportputinplaceforseniors,FAimplementedan“Adopt-a-Freshman”initiativethatsaweachteacheradoptfive9thgradescholarsinorderto“givethemanextrapush.”Throughthiseffort,teachersmetwiththeiradopteesonaweeklybasistoprovideanextralayerofsupport,checkinginontheirprogresstowardestablishedgoalswithaneyetowardmeetingthecentralgoalsthatdriveFAasawhole.AnadditionalgoaltoexposefreshmentofiveormorecollegecampusesoverthecourseoftheschoolyearcontributedtoFA’seffortsto,inthewordsofoneadministrator,“buildacollege-goingatmosphereandgetkidsfocusedonlife.”

OverallImpactofFreshmanAcademyFreshmanAcademywasdevelopedandimplementedbytheEastEPObecauseoftheprevailingresearchthatunderscoreshowcriticalsuccessisduringthefirstyearinhighschooltostudents’highschoolgraduation.Aftertwoyearsofimplementation,nearlythree-quarters(73%)ofadministratorsatEastbelievethatFAwillincrease9thgradescholars’chanceforUpperSchoolsuccess,accordingtoresponsesontheadministratorsurvey,whileanoverwhelmingmajorityofadministrators(91%)believethatFAprovideseffectivesupporttostudentsandisgenerallywell-organized.Administratorspointedtosocio-emotionalandacademicgainswhengaugingFreshmanAcademy’seffectivenesstodate.MostrecentacademicprojectionssharedbyEPOadministratorsindicatethat70–80percentof9thgradersareontrackforpromotionnextyear,withanotheradministratorsharingthatFAhadnotyetreacheditsgoalsforcreditaccrualandRegentspassratesbyspringof2017,“butwe’reclose—andit’sreallyexciting.”AnUpperSchooladministratorsummeduphersenseofFreshmanAcademy’simpactaftertwoyearsofimplementation:

“Ithinkit’smadeitlesseasyforachildtofallthroughthecracks—andoftenthat’swhathappensinthatfreshmanyear.Ithinktheamountofsupportstaffwehavededicatedtothat…WehaveaCareRoomconnectedtotheFreshmanAcademy,aswellastotheUpperSchoolandLowerSchoolingeneral,thathasbecomemuchmorefunctionalinaddressingstudentneeds.IthinkthemediationsthatwedohavebeeninstrumentalingettingkidstounderstandwhattherealpurposeincomingheretoEastisfor.Ithinkhaving2administratorsdirectlyassignedtotheFreshmanAcademyindicatesthelevelofsupporttheEPOhascommittedtogivingthemastrong,freshstartas9thgraders.”

Teachers’impressionsofFAsuccesswerelower,asshowninFigure27.Respondingviasurvey,45percentofUpperSchoolteachersandstaffrespondedthattheybelieveFAwillincreasescholars’UpperSchoolsuccess“tosomeoragreatextent,”and39percent“didnotknow”(seeFigure27).Similarly,41percentofUpperSchoolteachersbelievedthatFAprovidedeffectivesupporttostudents

Page 48: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–42–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

“tosomeoragreatextent,”and39percentwereunsurewhetherFAprovidedeffectivesupporttostudents.

Figure27.ExtentofUpperSchoolteachers’beliefsthatFreshmanAcademywillincrease9thgraders’successinUpperSchool,N=102

Note:IncludesresponsesofUpperSchoolteachersandteacherleadersonly.

PlannedChangesforYear3SomechangesorenhancementsarebeingconsideredforFreshmanAcademygoingforward.ThereisagoaltobettercoordinateplanningofcollegetripsandotherfieldtripstominimizethetimeFAscholarsspendoutofclass.FAleadersreceivedfeedbackfromteachersthatfeltconcernabouttheamountoftimescholarsspentoutofclassduringYear2.Thetimingofbothplannedexposures(i.e.,collegetripsandotherfieldtrips)andunforeseenevents(includingtragiclossesofmembersofthescholarcommunityandhistoricstormevents)compoundedtoresultinscholarsspendinglesstimeinclassthanisconducivetosupportprogresstowardacademicobjectives.Movingforward,FAadministratorsplantoevaluateexposurestoensurethattheyarenotconsistentlyheldonthesamecalendardaysorrepeatedlytapthesamegroupofstudentsforparticipation.

Thereisplannedcontinueduseoftoolstotrackhowstudentsareusingcertainsocio-emotionalsupportsinordertobetterunderstandanddocumenttheirimpact.FAadministratorsspecificallylaudedtheAcademysocialworker,counselors,andothersupportstafffortheireffortstocapturethenumberofreferralsandamountoftimescholarsspendutilizingsupportsliketheFACareRoom,counseling,andrelatedresources.Administratorsreportseeingpromisinggains,asmeasuredbyreducedsuspensions,moretimeinclass,increasedclassparticipation,andimprovedcoursepassingratesforsomestudentswhoheavilyrelieduponFAsupportservicesduringYear2.FAstaffcontinuetolookforwaysbeyondchangesinrecidivismratestoquantifyprogressalongsocio-emotionaldimensions.

20%

16%

25%

25%

14%

17%

2%

4%

39%

39%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

FreshmanAcademywillincrease9thgradescholars'chanceforsuccessinUpperSchool.

FreshmanAcademyprovideseffectivesupporttostudents.

PercentofRespondents(Totaln=102)

Toagreatextent-4 3 2 Notatall-1 Don'tknow

Page 49: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–43–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

Planningtomeettheneedsoftrauma-impactedFAscholarsisagoalforYear3.NinthgradesocialworkersandcounselorsadministeredasurveytoallFAstudents.Analyzingtheresultsandcomparingthemtonationaldata,supportstaffproceededtoleadathree-partseriesforFAteachersandstafftoexplorejusthowmuchimpacttraumahasonEast’s9thgraders.Subsequently,counselorsandsocialworkersgroupedscholarsbysurveyresultsandsimilarexperiencesandofferedcounselinggroupstothemforextrasupport.Scholarparticipationisentirelyvoluntary.Afterconversationsbetweenstudentsandasocialworkerorcounselortogaugeinterestandwillingnesstoparticipate,studentsaregiventheopportunitytomeetweeklywiththesocialworkerorcounselor,ortoindependentlytostartaddressingtraumaissues.Thesupportgrouptopicsincludegriefandloss,victimsofgunviolence,andsurvivalofsexualassault.Counselorsandsocialworkersstrivedtobuildacultureofsupportamongstparticipating9thgraderssotheydidnotfeelisolatedthroughouttheyear.Inconjunctionwiththeseefforts,theentireUpperSchoolandLowerSchoolcampusreadthetrauma-focusedpublication,“ReachingandTeachingChildrenWhoHurt.”Allofthesestrategiesweremeanttobetterassistteachersastheyworkwithstudentsonadailybasisandarepoisedtocontinueintonextyear.

ChallengesFreshmanAcademyfacesbothnewandongoingchallenges.Identifiedchallengesinclude:

• Attendance

• BetterservingEnglishlearnersandspecialeducationstudents

• MonitoringtheprogressofstudentsenrolledinotherprogramsbutforwhomEastisresponsible

Amajorongoingchallengeisstudentattendance,whichisnotashighasdesired.OnestaffmembersharedaconcernthatFAstudentswithlowattendancewerebeingcounseledintoalternativeprograms,whichmakesoverallFAattendancebetter.

AnotherconcernsharedwasthatwhiletheFAENLteachershowedextraordinaryleadershiptoassessandgroupENLstudents,thereremainsconcernonthepartofsometeachersthatthereisnotenoughtimeorenoughsupportforENLstudents.TeachersalsoraisedconcernsaboutmeetingtheneedsofspecialeducationscholarsinFreshmanAcademy,thoughthatwasmoreoftenexpressedaschallengeswithco-teaching.Thereisaneedforincreasedcommunicationbetweenspecialeducationandcontentclassroomteachers,andmoresupporttoensureco-teachingreachesitsfullpotential.

AdministratorsnotedthattherearescholarsfromEast’s2016cohortwhoarenoteducatedonsite,butforwhomEastisresponsible.OffsiteplacementscanincludeoneofthealternativeprogramswithinEast’sacademicportfolio,homeorhospitalconfinements,orjuvenilejusticefacilities.Inanefforttoensurethatthosestudentsgetandremainonasuccessfulacademictrackwithregardtoattendanceandcreditaccrual,FAadministratorshaveworkedtocollaborateandcoordinatewiththesupportstaffofthosesites.FAadministratorscontinuetostrengthenthosesystems.Oneadministratorelaboratedonthoseefforts,saying:

Page 50: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–44–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

“Wehavebuiltsystemswiththeschoolsocialworkersandthecounselorsattheotherlocationssothat,ifscholarsarecheckinginwithcounselors,thosecounselorswillreportbacktousweeklyonscholarattendanceandgradeprogress.Ifneeded,wecoordinatewiththeothersitetoseewhomayneedahomevisitortalktoaparent…Justbecausethey’reoutofsightdoesn’tmeanthey’reoutofmind.They’restillourkids.”

FamilyGroupFamilyGroup—aschool-widestructuremeanttocultivatebeneficialbehaviorsandsupportiverelationships—realizedameasureofsuccessbytheendofYear1.ByemergingasaprimaryvehiclebywhichrelationshipsacrossEastwerecultivated,FamilyGroupcontributedsignificantlytotheforgingofbondsbetweenandamongscholarsandstaffandacrosscommonschoolhousedivideslikegrade,language,background,andstaffrole,inabuildingwithamultitudeofnewfaces.However,asanticipated,therewasroomforrefinement,andFamilyGroupcontinuedtoevolveduringYear2ofimplementation.

WhilethegeneralstructureofthemodelunderwentverylittlechangefromYear1toYear2,substantivemodificationsweremadetoincreaseFamilyGroup’seffectivenessbyaddressingthemostconsistentchallengesthatsurfacedinYear1.Chiefamongthesechallengeswerepoorstudentattendance,studentengagementdifficulties,studentassignmentissues,andcurriculumimplementation.TheYear2adjustmentsimplementedtoaddressthesechallengesinclude:

• ChangingthetimeFamilyGrouptakesplaceintheUpperSchoolschedule

• Assigning“co-carents”tofacilitateeachFamilyGroup

• Increasingthenumberofschool-wideactivitiesheldduringFamilyGroup

• LoopingFamilyGroupassignmentsforconsecutiveschoolyears

• ShiftingtoaweeklyFamilyGrouplessonplanapproach

• Developingastudenttransferprocess

• CreatingcustomizedFamilyGroupstomeetspecificstudentneeds

Asimplementationchallengesarefrequentlyinterconnected,manyofthesesolutionspresenttheopportunitytoaddressmultiplechallengesatonce.Eachofthesesolutionsisfurtherdiscussedbelowand,aselsewhereinthisreport,weusedatacollectedfromfocusgroupsconductedwithteachers,students,administrators,andotherstaff;interviews;surveys;anddirectobservationtoassessthestatusofimplementation,identifyingthestrengthsandimpact(whenavailable)ofeachsolutionaswellasnotingongoingornewlysurfacedchallenges.

Page 51: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–45–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

Challenges,SolutionsandImpactofFamilyGroup

StudentAttendance

ToaddressthechallengeofpoorstudentattendanceatFamilyGroup,theplacementofFamilyGroupintheUpperSchoolscheduleshifted.Originallypositionednearthemiddaylunchperiods,UpperSchoolFamilyGroupwasmovedtobetweenfirstandsecondperiodstodiscourageskipping.Additionally,FreshmanAcademyscholarsweretransitionedoutofseparate9thgrade–onlyFamilyGroupsintoFamilyGroupswiththerestofUpperSchoolstudents—reducingtheoriginalscheduleofthreeseparate,dailyFamilyGroupperiods(oneeachforUpperSchool,LowerSchool,and9thgraders)downtotwo.Thischangefreeduptheavailabilityofsomestaffmembers,enablingeveryFamilyGrouptohaveatleasttwocarents—astaffingchallengepresentedbytheoriginalmodel.Bymostaccounts,boththenewmorningplacementandintroductionofco-carentsimprovedFamilyGroup.Betterattendancewasoneresult,asUpperSchoolscholarswerenolongerabletoextendtheirlunchperiodbyskippingFamilyGroup,andsomestaffwhowerenolongerfacilitating9thgradeFamilyGroupswerenewlyavailabletosweepstudentsintoFamilyGroupandoutofhallways.Increasedconnectionwasanotherresult,asstudentshadtheopportunitytoforgerelationshipswithanadditionaladultinthebuildingwhilereducingadegreeofisolationfromupperclassmenthatsomefreshmenreportedfeeling.

TheresultsofthisscheduleshiftwerementionedbymanystakeholdersintheEastcommunity,bothpositivelyandnegatively.Infocusgroups,studentssometimesremarkedthattheywerenotfondoftheschedulechangebutalsonotedthatskippingFamilyGrouphadbeenaprobleminYear1andthatthechangehadincreasedtheirpersonalFamilyGroupattendance:

“Idon’tlikethefactthattheymovedFamilyGroup.”“Theymoveditbecauseeverybodyusedtoskip.”“I’mgoingtotellyouthetruth—Ineverwentlastyear.”—exchangeinUpperSchoolstudentfocusgroup

“TheyslayeduswithourFamilyGroup.FamilyGroup[isnow]rightafterourfirstperiod.You[have]nochoicebuttogo.”—UpperSchoolstudent

Inrespondingtothesurveyquery,“WhathasbeenparticularlyeffectiveaboutFamilyGroupthisyear?”severalteachersofferedcommentsontheschedulechange,suchas“Thetiminghasimprovedattendanceasitnolongerrevolvesaroundthelunchperiods”and“ThereschedulingofUpperSchoolfamilygrouptoearlierinthedayhassignificantlyimprovedparticipation.”Similarly,onestaffmemberexplained:

“[A]welcomechangewassevering[FamilyGroup]fromlunch—whichsimplyinvitedhalfthebuildingtotakeonadoublelunch.IthinkmorekidsaregettingsomethingoutofitandfewerkidsareinthehallwayduringFamilyGrouptime.Thatinitselfisabenefit.”

Anadministratornoted:

Page 52: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–46–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

“Idon’thaveanUpperSchoolFamilyGroupsoI’mabletoclearthehallwaysandhelpkidsgetintoFamilyGroupduringtheUpperSchoolone.Iseefewerkidsskippingorinthehallwaysatthattime.”

Aschoolsafetyofficer(SSO)alsonotedthepositiveimpactoftheschedulechange,sharing,“Ourchange[inUpperSchoolFamilyGroup]fromafterlunchtosecondperiod[made]abigdifference.InUpperSchool,[there’sbeena]bigpositivechangeinFamilyGroupparticipationsincetheschedulechange.”

StudentEngagement

AnotherchallengeinYear1wasstudentdisengagementinFamilyGroup.Theintroductionofco-carentstofacilitateeachFamilyGroup,increasingthenumberofschool-wideactivitiesheldduringFamilyGroup,andFamilyGrouploopingwereallstrategiesimplementedtoaddressstudentdisengagement.TeachersandadministratorsalikebelievedthatstudentengagementwouldneedtoincreaseforFamilyGrouptoreachitsfullpotentialforimpact.Co-carentingwasonewaytoapproachthestudentengagementchallenge,asitwouldincreasescholars’chancesofconnectingwithacaringadult.Asmentioned,oneresultofthechangetotheUpperSchoolFamilyGroupschedulewastheopportunitytohaveeachFamilyGroupfacilitatedbyco-carents,incontrasttothesolocarentingcommoninYear1.Inadditiontohavingtwoco-carents,eachco-carentpairwouldbecomprisedofamaleandfemaleco-carent.Whilefewstudentswhoparticipatedinfocusgroupsspecificallycommentedonthesechanges,teachersandadministrators(ininterviewsandfocusgroups)werevocalinexpressingtheirbeliefthattheco-carentarrangementhadmadearealdifference.Thesebenefitspertainedtobuildingrelationshipswithscholars,overallFamilyGroupoperation,andmodelingpositivebehaviorsforstudents.Amajorityofrespondentstotheteacher/staffsurveyatboththeLowerSchool(70%)andUpperSchool(78%)believethatco-carentinghasimprovedFamilyGroupthisyeartoasomeoragreatextent(Figure28).

Figure28.Extentteachersandstaffbelieveco-carentinghasimprovedFamilyGroup

52%

48%

52%

24%

22%

26%

15%

28%

10%

6%

9%

2%

2%

3%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Total

LowerSchool

UpperSchool

PercentofRespondents(Totaln=161)

Toagreatextent-4 3 2 Notatall-1 Don'tknow

Page 53: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–47–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

Whenaskedonthesurveywhattheyfoundtobe“particularlyeffectiveaboutFamilyGroupthisyear,”teacherrespondentscitedthepresenceofaco-carentmorefrequentlythananyothersinglefactor(13%ofresponses).Representativestatementsincluded:

“Havingtwoco-carentshashelpedusmodelapositivesocialrelationshipwitheachotherthatextendstoourrelationshipswithstudentsandtheirrelationshipsbetweenoneanother.”

“Thisismyfirstyearwithco-carents.Thisisahugebenefit,asdifferentpersonalitiesallowfordifferentconnectionsforthestudents.”

“Co-carentinghasmadeahugedifferenceincreatingthefamilycultureinFamilyGroup.”

“Ithasbeenhelpfultohaveaco-carenttoworkwith,bothinbalancinginteractionswithstudentsandinmanagingFamilyGroupduties.”

“Co-carentinghasbeenhugeinbuildingrelationshipsbecausestudentsmayconnectbetterwithoneortheother.”

Most(64%)ofadministratorsalsobelieveco-carentinghasimprovedFamilyGroupto“someoragreatextent,”accordingtoresponsesontheadministratorsurvey.Ininterviews,administratorsechoedteachersentiments,saying:

“Theschedulechangehasbeenarealplusandhaving2carentsineveryroomhasbeenarealplus,”and“TheFamilyGroupredesignwithco-carentshasbeengreat.Kidshaveoptionsforconnecting.”

StudentsalsooverwhelminglybelievethatFamilyGrouphelpsthemtobuildrelationshipswithadultsatEast(seefigure29).Onthestudentsurvey,82percentofLowerSchoolstudentsand92percentofUpperSchoolstudentsreportedtheyagreeorstronglyagreewiththestatement:FamilyGroupshelpsmetobuildrelationshipswithteachersandadministratorsatEast.

Page 54: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–48–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

Figure29.ExtentstudentsbelieveFamilyGrouphelpsthembuildrelationshipswithteachersandadministrators

Moreschool-wideactivities,likesportstournaments,schoolbeautificationefforts,andblockpartyactivities,wereincorporatedduringYear2ofFamilyGroupimplementationinanefforttocultivatestudentparticipationandbuy-in.Instudentfocusgroups,theseschool-wideeffortswereoftenattributedtotheUpperSchoolprincipal,andwerefavorablymentionedseveraltimesincommentssuchas,“IlikehowthePrincipalmakesupactivitiesthatcanbeplayedduringFamilyGroup—basketballtournament,volleyballtournament.”Onthesurvey,someteachersalsoidentifiedtheseactivitiesasbeingamongthemosteffectiveaspectsofFamilyGroupinYear2,indicating,“Thosestudentsinvolvedintheathletictournamentsenjoyedthemthoroughly,”and“School-widetournamentsandblockpartiestokeepthestudentsengagedandwantingtocometoFamilyGroup[areparticularlyeffective].”Oneteacherfurtherelaborated,“InitiativessuchastheRocktheTestdoordecoratingcontest,LeaderinMeposter-makingtobeautifytheschool,TrickorTreatinginblocks;…unifyingstrandslikeshowingtheEagleEyeonMondays,…bigeventslike[the]basketballtournamentandpicturewiththedroneonBlackLivesMatterdayweredramaticandbonding.”

AllLowerSchoolandapproximatelyhalfofUpperSchoolFamilyGroupslooped(i.e.,maintainedthesamesetofscholarsandcarentparticipants)fromYear1toYear2.ThisefforttopreserveFamilyGroupswasmadesoasnottodisruptthebondsthathadformedduringYear1ofimplementation.AdministratorshopetoloopmoreUpperSchoolFamilyGroupsinthe2017–18schoolyear.

StudentAssignment

InYear1,itwasbelievedthatsomestudentsdidnotparticipateinFamilyGroupbecauseofthecarentorotherstudentsinthegroup.Also,thepolicyatthetimewasnottotransferstudentswhorequestedatransferfromonetoanotherFamilyGroup.Toaddressthechallengeofparticipation,astudenttransferprocesswasdeveloped,andcustomizedFamilyGroupswerecreatedtomeettheneedsofspecial

35%

32%

47%

50%

12%

11%

5%

7%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

UpperSchool

LowerSchool

StronglyAgree Agree Disagree StronglyDisagree

Page 55: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–49–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

studentpopulations.DuringYear1,noformalprovisionwasmadeforstudenttransferfromoneFamilyGrouptoanother.Theoriginalintentionofthisno-transferpolicywastofurtherencouragethedevelopmentofrelationshipsbetweenandamongscholarsandstaffwhomightnototherwisecrosspaths.However,someteachersbelievedthisapproachlackedanecessarysensitivitywithregardtostudentplacement,aswellasamountingtoamissedopportunitytomeettheneedsofstudentsinspecialcircumstances,suchasbilingualandENLstudentswhowerenotalwaysplacedwithcarentswhocouldspeaktheirnativetonguesorwhohadlong-termattendanceissues.

AformalstudenttransferprocesswasimplementedatthestartofYear2,consistingofthecompletionofaspecialFamilyGrouptransferformbythescholardesiringtransferandadiscussionofthecompletedforminafollow-upmeetingwiththescholar’scarent(s).IntheLowerSchool,administratorsofferthescholaranopportunitytoparticipateinarestorativecircleinanattempttoencourageandassistthescholarinpersistinginhisorheroriginalFamilyGroup.Alladultsinvolvedendeavortoensurethatthescholar’svoiceisheardinthesetransferproceedings.IntheUpperSchool,ifthetransferinvolvesasafetyissueofsomekind,ittriggersanautomaticFamilyGroupchangewithin24hours.Otherwise,theprocessproceedsasitdoesattheLowerSchoollevel.

SpecialFamilyGroupsmeanttomeettheneedsofbilingualandENLstudentswerealsoformedinYear2andareco-carentedbyESOLandnon-ESOLteachersoradministrators.AdditionalcustomizedFamilyGroupscreatedinYear2thatstrivetoaddressthespecificneedsofparticularEaststudentpopulationsincludeoneforstudentswithsevereattendanceissues(co-carentedbyasocialworkerandspecialeducationteacher)andaFamilyGroupforover-ageseniors(facilitatedbyanadministratorandguidancecounselor).Asoneteachercommentedonthesechanges,“Wearetryingtolookatindividualsituations.Ourultimategoalisconnection.”Staffhavenoticedthedifferencethesedevelopmentshavemade.

Ateacherfocusgroupparticipantexpressedthat“[FamilyGroup]iswaybetterthisyearafteradministratorslistenedtobilingualstudents’needformoresupport.”TeachersurveyparticipantsalsoparticularlynotedthedifferencetheadjustedstudentassignmentpolicyhasmadeforbilingualandENLscholars:

“FamilyGrouphasbeenacommunity-buildingexperienceformulti-culturalELLgroups.”

“Havingstudentsfromthesameethnic/linguisticbackgroundtogetherhasbeenveryeffective.MyNepalistudents(andourAfricanfriendsaswell,actually!)seeFamilyGroupasasafeplace,aplacethatbelongstothem,wheretheycanfeelcomfortabletalkingandsharingandexpressingthemselves.”

FamilyGroupCurriculumImplementation

InYear1,manycarentscomplainedthatdailyFamilyGrouplessonplanspresentedtoomuchstructure.Teachersgrappledwithprescribeddailylessonplansthatleftlessroomforadaptationthanmanydesired.Thisyear,FamilyGroupcoachesareprovidingweeklylessonplans.Weeklyplansalsoincreasecarents’abilitytorespondtoscholars’needsandinterestsinrealtime.Studentswhobenefitedfromthisflexibilityrespondedwelltothevarietyofactivitiestheywerenowoffered.AsoneUpperSchool

Page 56: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–50–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

studentcommented,“Idon’tknowaboutotherFamilyGroups,butoursisveryoutgoing.Wedolotsofactivities—wewenticeskating,onahauntedhayride,wedobirthdayparties....”Someteachersidentified“movementawayfromlastyear'srigidityindeliveryofmandatorylessonplans,dailycircles,etc.,”“weeklylessonplanswithmoreflexibility,”and“freedomtodowhatyouthinkisbestforyourfamilygroup,whilestillbeingencouragedtoutilizefamilygrouplessonplans”as“particularlyeffective”elementsofFamilyGroupthisyear.Otherstaffsecondedthisassessment:

“The[FamilyGroup]activitiesaredifferent[thisyear],Inoticed.Theactivitiesaremoreintriguingforthemtogoto.”—SchoolSecurityOfficer

“Familygroupislessrigidthanlastyear—thegeneralunderstandingthatthereissomeflexibilityastohowit’sdeliveredeachdaywasawelcomechange.”—Counselor

OverallImpact

Itistoosoontoknow,andperhapswillbetoodifficulttoisolate,thespecificimpactFamilyGroupwillultimatelyhaveonEastUpperandLowerSchool.However,whenteachersandadministratorswereaskedininterviewsandfocusgroupstoidentifytheEastEPOinitiativethathashadthemostimpactonEast’scultureandclimate,FamilyGroupwasmostoftencited.Alladministrators,respondingbysurvey,believethatFamilyGrouphascontributedtoapositivecultureandclimateatEastoveralltosomeoragreatextent—with55percentbelievingthatcontributionhasbeenmade“toagreatextent.”OneadministratoraddedthatFamilyGrouphascontributedto“Seeingkidsbuildtoleranceforothersthattheywouldnothaveinteractedwithinatypicalhighschoolsetting.”Inaninterview,whenaskedwhatthemaindriversofthecultureandclimateshiftatEastcurrentlyare,anadministratoropined:

“Iwould[creditFamilyGroup]—andI’dsayitworkstwoways.Kidshaveanadultthattheyknowadvocatesforthemandthattheycangoto.Theotherpartofthatiskidsbeingsurroundeddailybykidstheywouldn’tnormallyinteractwithhastaughttoleranceandrespectforall.Ifeelwhenkidsseeoneanotherinthehallorinthecafeteria,itmaynotbepeopletheyhangoutwith,butasadirectresultofconnectingwiththemeverydayfor30minutes,there’sadifferentsenseofunity…thatbringsEasttogether.Iknowthatit’sbeeninstrumentalforkidsindealingwithtragedies.”

AsdemonstratedbyFigure30below,65percentofteachersandstaffattheLowerSchooland80percentofthoseattheUpperSchoolconcur.TeachersurveyrespondentsalsobelieveaparticularlyeffectiveaspectofFamilyGroupisthatit“supportsstudents’academicandemotionalneeds.”Oneteachershared:“Familygroupisagreatstructureforstudentsandstafftobuildacultureoftrustandclosenessthatonlyfurtherstheacademicgoalsoftheschool.It'soneofmyfavoritethingsaboutEast.”

Page 57: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–51–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

Figure30.ExtentteachersandstaffbelieveFamilyGrouphascontributedtoapositiveclimateandcultureatEast

TeachersandadministratorsatEastreportseeingadditionalimpactsofFamilyGroupinvolvementrelatedtostudents’socialskilldevelopment(Figure31),anincreaseinself-advocacyandself-empowerment(Figure32),andcontinuedrelationshipbuilding(Figure33).Viasurvey,teachersandstaffnoted:

“Wedosmallprojectstogether[inFamilyGroup]andthekidsbuildinterpersonalskillsfromthem.”

“WehaveusedFamilyGrouptoteachactivelistening,responsibility,respect,advocacy,andotherskillsnecessaryforlifeoutsideofhighschool.”

“Familygrouphasbeenaverypositiveexperienceforourstudents,includingseveralstudentswhohave‘comeoutoftheirshells’andevenencourageotherstodothesame.”

43%

37%

45%

33%

28%

35%

19%

26%

17%

3%

7%

2%

1%

2%

1%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Total

LowerSchool

UpperSchool

PercentofRespondents(Totaln=161)

Toagreatextent-4 3 2 Notatall-1 Don'tknow

Page 58: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–52–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

Figure31.ExtentteachersandstaffbelieveFamilyGrouphaspositivelyimpactedstudents’developmentofsocialskills

Figure32.ExtentteachersandstaffbelieveFamilyGrouphaspositivelyimpactedstudentself-advocacyandself-empowerment

Studentscommentedontheirownself-advocacygainsinstudentfocusgroupconversations:

“IlikemyFamilyGroup.Weplaygames.Wetalk—butwetalkaboutthingsthatwewanttotalkabout.”

21%

20%

22%

41%

37%

39%

32%

37%

31%

6%

4%

7%

1%

2%

1%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Total

LowerSchool

UpperSchool

PercentofRespondents(Totaln=160)

Toagreatextent-4 3 2 Notatall-1 Don'tknow

16%

17%

17%

42%

39%

43%

34%

33%

34%

6%

9%

6%

2%

2%

1%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Total

LowerSchool

UpperSchool

PercentofRespondents(Totaln=160)

Toagreatextent-4 3 2 Notatall-1 Don'tknow

Page 59: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–53–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

“Ourcarentsaredifferent—[they]careaboutus.Anythingwewant—webringittotheirattention.”

“ForLowerSchool,[FamilyGroup]iskindaspecialbecausewehavecarents,teacherswhoactasourcarent.…Wehavethese7habits[wefocuson]andweusuallyhaveactivitiesthatrevolvearoundthem.Like‘betenacious,advocateforselfandothers’.…Andwetalkaboutourdayandwhat[we’reupto].”

Administrators,teachersurveyrespondents,andfocusgroupparticipantsoutlinedotherself-advocacyandempowermentbenefitsthathaveaccruedtoEaststudentsasaresultofFamilyGroupparticipation:

“StudentshavetakenaccountabilityforremindingeachothertoattendFGaswellasfeelcomfortablediscussingissuesthatareimpactingthem.”–Teacherstaffsurvey

“IthinkkidsinEastHighSchoolaremoreawarethantheyeverwereofwhattheyneedandhowtoadvocateforit.FamilyGrouphashelpedwiththat.”–Teacherfocusgroup

“FamilyGroupgivesstudentsavoiceinasafesetting.”–Administratorsurvey

LowerSchoolstudentsinparticulartouchedupontherelationshipsthey’vedevelopedinFamilyGroup,declaring,“Ilikethewaythecarentstreatus”or“Ilikethatwehaveourownlittlegroupofpeoplethatwecanconnectwith.”Therelationship-buildingaspectofFamilyGroupisevidentinstudentsurveyresponses(seeFigure33).AmajorityofLowerSchoolstudents(82%)andUpperSchoolstudents(81%)agreeorstronglyagreethat“FamilyGrouphelpsthembuildrelationshipswithotherscholars.”Similarly,82percentofLowerSchoolstudentsand83percentofUpperSchoolstudentsagreeorstronglyagreethat“FamilyGrouphelpsbuildrelationshipswithotheradults.”Bothininterviewsandinteachersurveyresponses,whenasked“WhathasbeenparticularlyeffectiveaboutFamilyGroupthisyear?”teachershighlightedtherelationship-buildingbenefitsofFamilyGroupparticipation.Intheteacher/staffsurvey,78percentofthoseattheLowerSchooland89percentofthoseattheUpperSchoolagreetosomeoragreatextentthatFamilyGrouphasfacilitatedthedevelopmentofsupportiverelationshipsbetweenstudentsandstaff(seeFigure34).Teachersandstaffsharedthefollowingthoughtsabouttherelationship-buildingimpactofFamilyGroupinfocusgroups:

“There[have]beenmoregenuineconnectionsbetweenteachersandstudents.Studentsfeelcomfortablesharing.”

“Myfamilygrouphascollaboratedwithotherneighboringfamilygroups,callingeachothercousins.”

“TheopportunitytobuildrelationshipsthroughFamilyGroupisexceptional.”

“Buildingrelationshipswithstudentsthatallowthemtoseeyouasacaringadultwhotheycanreachouttoduringatimeofneed.”

“FamilyGrouphasbeenreallybeneficial.It’sdefinitelyhelped[scholars]feelliketheyareconnectedatschoolandacrossgradelevels.It’sfuntowatchkidswhowouldn’tinteractinthehallwayorbefriendshavingpositiverelationshipswithoneanother.Andlearning

Page 60: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–54–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

fromoneanother—6thgraderswhoarealittleimmaturewith8thgradersgivingthemtheteacherlook–andthemself-correcting.”

Figure33.ExtentstudentsbelieveFamilyGrouphelpsthemtobuildrelationshipswithotherscholars

Figure34.ExtentteachersandstaffbelieveFamilyGrouphaspositivelyimpactedrelationshipbuildingatEast

33%

34%

48%

48%

12%

11%

7%

6%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

UpperSchool

LowerSchool

PercentofRespondents

StronglyAgree Agree Disagree StronglyDisagree

42%

39%

42%

44%

39%

47%

10%

15%

8%

3%

4%

2%

1%

2%

1%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Total

LowerSchool

UpperSchool

PercentofRespondents(Totaln=160)

Toagreatextent-4 3 2 Notatall-1 Don'tknow

Page 61: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–55–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

ImpactonAcademics

StudentsalludedtotheacademicbenefitsthatcamewithparticipationinsomeFamilyGroups.AnUpperSchoolstudentfocusgroupparticipantexplained:

“Whenitcomestoyourgrades,[ourcarentsare]veryserious.OnWednesdays,wegooverprogressreportsandtheyhelpusgetworkdone.Iknowit’sonlyahalfhour—it’snotalotoftimeforit,wehave10kidsinourfamilygroup—buttheyreallycareaboutus.”

Someteachersobserved,“Studentsareholdingthemselvestohigheracademicexpectationsoverallandaremorewillingtohaveconversationsabouttheimportanceofacademicsuccessandobstacles[asaresultofFamilyGroup]”and“[themosteffectivepartofFamilyGroupis]keepingstudentsontrackacademicallybyreviewingprogressreports.”

Atleastoneadministrator,participatinginafocusgroup,notedthatFamilyGroupwasplayingaroleinacademicallyreconnectingsomestudentswhohadbecomedisengagedfromschooling:

“WehadsomekidswhohardlycametoschoolatalllastyearinmyFamilyGroupandoneofthemwentto[ourprincipaltosay]hewantstomakesurehegraduatesandaskedwhatneedstobedone,soIamseeingacultureshift.”

NewandOngoingChallenges

Thoughbothimprovementsandnewsuccesseshavebeenrealized,newandongoingchallengesalsoremain,includingtheuseofFamilyGrouptime,developmentofstudenttrust,carentbuy-in,andstudentengagement.

FamilyGroupissupposedtobe“structuredplay,”withanintendedblendof80percentfunand20percentwork.Bothstudentsandstaffhaveremarked(infocusgroups,surveys,and,inonecase,FamilyGroupobservation)thatFamilyGrouptimehasrepeatedlybeenco-optedthisyear“togetotherworkdone,”asthequotationsfromstudentsandteachersdemonstrate:

“Idon’tlikehowwehavetodoworkinfamilygroup.[Wedidn’thavetodoworklastyear.][Now]wehavetodobooks.[Work]tookoverourwholefamilygroup.Lastyearwehaddonutparties.”—LowerSchoolstudent

“Alotofinitiativeshavebeenpushedthroughfamilygroupthisyear—lotsofprojects.Sometimes,it’stoomany.Sometimesyoujustneedtobetogetherasagroup.”—Teacher

“Withthe7habits,therearewaytoomany‘objectives’forFamilyGroup.”—Teacher/staffsurvey

“MaybeFamilyGroupdoesn’talwaysfitforallkids.…Theysayitshouldbe80percentfunbutmaybeit’snotwhatkidsthinkisfun.Weneedtotrybettertoincorporatetheirvoice.”—Teacher

Page 62: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–56–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

TrustinFamilyGroupisstillunder-developedforsomescholars.Thisisevidentinthefollowingfocusgroupexchangewithstudents:

“Teacherstrytoknowyourwholelife.Idon’ttrusttellingteachersmybusiness—they’reannoying.”“Theypry,thenviolateyourtrust.”“Teacherstellyourbusinesstootherteachersandyourclassmates.”“Forme,no.It’slikeshesaid—youcan’ttrusttheCarents.”

Someteachersarestilluncomfortablewith/resistanttothecarentrole,orfeeltheydonothavetheprofessionaltrainingtoaddressthemultitudeofpersonalissuesthatstudentsoftenbring.Afewteacherssharedthisconcern:

“FamilyGroupneedstobeaboutcommunitybuilding.Itcouldusemoresupport.Itseemstobemostsuccessfulwhenplayinggames,etc.,andlesssuccessfulwithsocial/emotionalsupport.Notsurewhy—we’renotsocialworkers.Maybemakeitaclubtime.…It’shardforteacherstodiveintotheissuesthatkidshave.Clubsmighthelpthemgetengagedinamorepositiveway…—wedon’tneedtobearmchairpsychologists.”

“Myco-Carenthasnotbeenopentodoingmoreactivitieswithourgrouptobuildrelationships.IthasmadeFGawkwardanduselesstobothofusasco-Carentsandthestudents.”

SomescholarscomplainofcontinuedFamilyGroupdisengagement(i.e.,boredom,indifference).Forsome,thisboredomisbecauseoftheactivities,forothersit’sthedifferencesinFamilyGroups,withsomeperceivedtobemorefunthanothers.Somestudentcommentsthatillustratetheengagementchallengeinclude:

“Idon’treallylikeFamilyGroup.It’sboring.Ijustsitthereandwatchvideosallthetime[Interviewer:Onyourowndevice?]Yeah.[Interviewer:Isthatbecauseeverythingthat’sgoingonisn’trelevanttoyou?]Idon’tknow…I’mjustnotintoit.”

“Wedon’tdo[anything]buttalkinFamilyGroup.Every.Day.Andmakecards—wejustdothemostboringstuff.It’sboring.”

ChangesforYear3

InterviewswithadministratorsandFamilyGroupcoachessuggestedsomepossiblechangesthatarebeingconsideredforFamilyGroupnextyear.Theseinclude:

• LowerSchoolFamilyGroupmayalsomovetoamorningtimeslot.

• FamilyGroupwillhaveaheightenedfocusonacademics,college,andcareers.

• TherewillbemorecollaborationbetweenFamilyGroupcoachesandcarents.

• MoreconnectionswillbemadebetweenFamilyGroupsandtheHOMESpartner.

• FamilyGrouprubricwillberevisedtoprovidemoremeaningfulfeedback.

Page 63: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–57–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

• FamilyGroupmayhaveacommunityservicecomponent.

RestorativePracticesRestorativePracticeswereincludedintheEPOPlantohelpmeetthegoalsofreducingthenumberofsuspensions,improvingstudentbehavior,andimprovingthegeneralcultureandclimateoftheschool.AttheendofYear1,stakeholdersdescribedtheimplementationofRestorativePracticeswithbothoptimismandsomeconcern.DespitesuccessessuchascirclesinFamilyGroupandduringclasstime,theconceptofRestorativePracticeswasverynewforbothteachersandstudentslastyear,anditsimplementationledtosomemisunderstandingsandmiscommunication.Studentsinitiallybelievedtherewouldnotbeconsequencesformisbehavior,andteachersstruggledwithbalancingdisciplineandRestorativePractices.Allschoolsecurityofficershadnotbeentrained,resultinginsomeinconsistentimplementation.Duringthesummerof2016andduringYear2aswell,furtherprofessionallearningwasprovidedforteachersandstaff,andclarificationofprocedureswasdeveloped,aswellastheuseofanonlinetrackingprocedureforbehaviorandotherstudentreferrals.

OneofthechangeswithRestorativePracticesthisyearisthatmoreoftheresponsibilityhasshiftedtothesocialworkers.DuringafocusgroupwithallsevensocialworkersontheEastteam,evaluatorslearnedthatfoursocialworkersareontheRestorativePracticesCommitteeandhavetrainedEaststaffinRestorativePracticesthroughrestorativeworkshops.Socialworkersreportedthey“allfacilitateorconductrestorativepracticesdaily,whetherit’safull-blownpeacecirclewithparentsandRPD,orahallwayconversationtorepair[thedynamic]betweenteacherandscholartogetthembackintheclassroom,orbetweentwoadultswhoneedtocircleupsotheycanrepairtheirrelationshipandco-teach.”Bothteachersandscholarsareinitiatingthemediations,andsocialworkerspointedtothepoweroftheseinteractions,noting,“Whenyousitdownwithstudentandteacher,witheveryoneasanequalparticipantandnosenseofauthorityintheroomatthatmoment,totrytounderstandoneanotherandrepair,it’saverypowerfulthing.It’ssuccessfulifpeoplearebeinggenuine.Especiallywhenthere’sbeenaharmdone,[but]youhavetogivepeopletime.”Thatwasamisconceptionatthebeginningoftheyear—someweretooquicktoinsistonamediationorcirclewhenallpartieswerenotnecessarilyready.“Well,iftheactorsaren’tready,arestillveryupset…weneedtorespecthowtheyfeelandgivethemtimesocirclesareeffective…whenwehavethosemoments,themajorityoftimethey’resuccessful.”Andanothershared:

“Onedifferencefromlastyearisallvoicesareheard—peoplearelisteningtokidsmoreinsteadofjustrespondingandreacting.Insteadof‘Idon’tcarewhathappened,Idon’twanttohearyourside,’kidshaveavoice.”

Schooladministrators,EPOleaders,teachers,staff,counselors,andsocialworkersallcreditRestorativePracticeswithbeingakeycontributortochangingthecultureandclimateattheschool,includinggenerallyimprovedstudentbehavior.TheuseofRestorativePracticesgivesstudentsavoice,andtheyhavebeenlearningandpracticingskillstocopewithconflict.AdultsandstudentsintheschoolareseeingRestorativePracticesinactionmoreandmore,buttherearesomewhohavenotexperiencedRestorativePractices.Additionally,therearesometeacherswhobelievetheimplementationandimpact

Page 64: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–58–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

ofRestorativePracticescouldbeincreasedschoolwideiftheschoolleadershipatthehighestlevelsweremoreinvolvedorpresentwithRestorativePractices.

Intheremainderofthissection,wesharethebenefitsandchallengesofRestorativePracticesthatemergedfrominterviewswithschooladministrators,focusgroupswithteachers,counselors,socialworkers,andschoolsecurityofficers,aswellastheteacher/staffandthestudentsurveys.

BenefitsofRestorativePracticesStudents,teachers,administrators,andleadersgavefeedbackaboutthebenefitsofimplementingRestorativePracticesatEastduringfocusgroups,interviews,andonsurveys.Acrossallconstituents,anumberofbenefitswereconsistentlymentioned.Theseinclude:

• Asignificantreductioninstudentsuspensions

• Anoticeablereductioninphysicalconfrontationsbetweenstudents

• Anincreaseinstudentvoice,self-confidence,andself-respect

• Improvedrelationshipsbetweenteachersandstudents

• Studentsresolvingtheirissuesandencouragingeachothertoresolveproblemspeacefullyratherthaninstigatingorchampioningviolence

• Apalpableshiftintheschool’scultureandclimateattributedtorestorativeconversationstakingplaceinFamilyGroups

• Restorativecirclesandconversationsbeinginitiatedbybothstudentsandstaff

• Restorativecirclesandconversationsbeingconductedstudenttostudent,stafftostaff,andstudenttostaff

Open-endedcommentsfromteachersonthesurveyaboutbenefitsforstudentsfromimplementationofRestorativePracticeswerenumerousandfocusedmainlyonanincreaseinstudentvoice,self-confidence,andself-respect.Theynotedthatstudentshavebecomeproactive,initiatingaconferenceorcirclethemselvestoresolveanissueandavoidfurtherconsequences.Teachersdescribedstudentsasbeingmoreconfidentandtendingtofeelmore“incontroloftheirownlives.”TeachersalsosharedhowRestorativePracticesareimpactingtheirclassroomsforthebetter.Forexample,oneteachershared:

“Thispracticehasbeeneffectiveforconflictsthathaveriseninmyclasseswithstudentsthroughmiscommunicationsmainly.Ihaveinitiatedconversationsandstudentshaveinitiatedconferencesaswell.Ihavealsoused[restorativepractices]tocelebratestudentsuccess.”

SurveyresultsalsosupportsomeofthebenefitsofRestorativePracticesidentifiedinfocusgroups.Forexample,87percentofteachersandteacherleadersintheLowerSchoolreportusingRestorativePracticesintheirclassroomswiththeirstudents;asmallermajorityofteachers(66%)attheUpperSchoolalsoreportusingRestorativePracticesintheirclassrooms(seeFigure35).Amajorityofteachers,teacherleaders,counselors,andsocialworkerswhoworkprimarilyintheLowerSchoolhaveobservedtheuseofRestorativePracticestohelpeffectivelyresolvestudentconflicts,with70percentresponding

Page 65: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–59–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

to“someoragreatextent.”AmongthosewhoworkprimarilyattheUpperSchool,only43percentreportedto“someoragreatextent”thattheyhaveseentheuseofRestorativePracticeshelpingtoeffectivelyresolvestudentconflicts(seeFigure36).Teachers,teacherleaders,counselors,andsocialworkerswhoworkprimarilyintheLowerSchoolgenerallyagreedthatRestorativePracticescontributetoapositivecultureatEast,with72percentagreeingwiththatstatementto“someoragreatextent.”AttheUpperSchool,only56percentagreedto“someoragreatextent”thatRestorativePracticescontributestoapositivecultureandclimateatEast(seeFigure37).

Figure35.Extentteachers/staffhaveusedRestorativePracticesintheirclassroomwiththeirstudents

28%

50%

17%

46%

37%

49%

20%

13%

24%

6%

10%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Total

LowerSchool

UpperSchool

PercentofRespondents(Totaln=162)

Toagreatextent-4 3 2 Notatall-1 Don'tknow

Page 66: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–60–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

Figure36.Extentteachers/staffobservedtheuseofRestorativePracticeseffectivelyhelpingtoresolvestudentconflicts

Figure37.Extentteachers/staffbelieveRestorativePracticescontributetoapositivecultureandclimateatEast

19%

35%

12%

33%

35%

31%

36%

22%

43%

12%

9%

12%

1%

1%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Total

LowerSchool

UpperSchool

PercentofRespondents(Totaln=164)

Toagreatextent-4 3 2 Notatall-1 Don'tknow

25%

35%

21%

38%

37%

35%

29%

22%

35%

7%

7%

7%

1%

2%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Total

LowerSchool

UpperSchool

PercentofRespondents(Totaln=163)

Toagreatextent-4 3 2 Notatall-1 Don'tknow

Page 67: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–61–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

Onsurveys,studentswereaskedtowhatextenttheyagreedordisagreedwithanumberofstatementspertainingtoRestorativePractices.Nearlyhalf(47%)ofUpperSchoolrespondentsindicatedtheydisagreedwiththestatement,“IunderstandwhatRestorativePracticeis.”Sixtypercentoftheserespondentsalsoindicatedtheydisagreedwiththestatements,“IhaveparticipatedinaRestorativeCircletoaddressaproblemIwashaving,”and“IhaveparticipatedinaRestorativeCircletoaddressaproblemsomeoneelsewashaving.”Sixty-fivepercentindicatedtheybelieve“RestorativePracticeshelpsbuildapositiveenvironmentatEast.”Whetherpunishmentsarefairandreasonableandwhetherallstudentsreceivethesamepunishmentsorconsequencesforthesamemisbehaviorsareareasthatmayneedfurtherexploration,as44percentand40percent,respectively,disagreedwiththesestatements.

MoreLowerSchoolstudentsindicatedtheyunderstandwhatRestorativePracticeis(62%)ascomparedwithUpperSchoolstudents,and69percentbelieveRestorativePracticeshelpbuildapositiveenvironmentatEast.AhigherpercentageofLowerSchoolstudents(60%)“agreedorstronglyagreed”withthestatementthattheyhadparticipatedinarestorativecircletoaddressaproblemtheywerehaving,comparedto41percentofUpperSchoolstudents(seeFigure38).AhigherpercentageofLowerSchoolstudents(69%)comparedtoUpperSchoolstudents(54%)“agreedorstronglyagreed”withthestatement“RestorativePracticeshelpsbuildapositiveenvironmentatEast.”WhetherpunishmentsarefairandreasonableandwhetherallstudentsreceivethesamepunishmentsorconsequencesforthesamemisbehaviorswereratedslightlybetterbyLowerSchoolstudents,butmightneedfurtherexploration,as38%and39%,respectively,disagreedwiththesestatements.

Figure38.Percentageofstudentswhohaveparticipatedinarestorativecircletoaddressaproblemtheywerehaving

7%

16%

33%

41%

43%

32%

17%

11%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

UpperSchool

LowerSchool

PercentofRespondents

StronglyAgree Agree Disagree StronglyDisagree

Page 68: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–62–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

Tenstudentfocusgroupswereconductedduringspring2017.Inthree,RestorativePracticeswerementionedspecifically,andintwotheywerereferredtoindirectly.ThosewhodidbringupRestorativePracticeshadvaryingopinions.Somequotationsfromthestudentfocusgroupsillustratetheseopinions:

“Idon’tlikepeacecirclesbecausetheydon’twork.Peoplesayallthesepromisesandtheyneverdoit.”

“Peacecirclescanbeawasteoftime.Ifit’sabigclassthat’shavingaconflict,it’sawasteoftime.Butifit’stwopeoplethatgotintoafightorargument,itmightwork.”

“Mostvaluablethingismediationwhenthereareconflicts.”

“Talkitout.Figureoutwhattherealproblemisbytalkingitout.”

Feedbackfromadministratorandleaderinterviewspointedouttheprogressbeingachievedwithrestorativestrategies,especiallycircles,andtheymentionedthatcirclesinvolvestudentstostudents,stafftostaff(professionalconflict/discord),andstafftostudents(togettotherootcauseofmisbehaviorinclass).Aprincipalnotedthatstudentsarebeginningtobetterunderstandwhatrestorativepracticestrategiesareavailabletothemandwhatthegoalisbecausetheyoften“circleup”forreasonsotherthanafightordisagreement,whichinheropinionshowsachangeinbehavior.“Theysometimesarerequestingrestorativecirclesandpeacecirclesevenpriortoanincident.Theyaretryingtowardoffthosethingsthattypicallyescalatetosuspension,whichmeanslesstimeinschool.NowIoftenhearkidssay,‘I’mnotgoingtogetsuspended,Miss.I’mnotgoingtodoit.Ineedhelp.Youneedtobringustogether.Weneedtogetthissettled.”Inaddition,anadministratorsharedthattherehavebeentwoinstanceswhereanotherstudenthashadasimilarexperienceasthestudentscirclingupandwasaskedtojointhecircle.Theadministratorsharingthatexperiencesaid,“Thatwouldbeanothergoalforus—tohaveagroupofscholarstrainedtoleadcirclespeer-to-peer.”

Feedbackreceivedfromnearlyallconstituentsrevealstherehasbeena“palpablechangeinculture,”andoneleaderstated,“Everyonedeservescreditforitincludingstudents,families,leaders,teachers.We’vegonefromapunitiveculturewithover3,000suspensions,andthoseareonlytheonesthatarerecorded,toaculture/climatethatisrestorative–clearlydemonstratedbythedramaticreductioninsuspensions,fights,reportableinstances–dramaticdecreases.”Anotherbenefitmentionedwasarapidreductionofemployeegrievancescomparedtolastyear.Oneadministratorsharedhowchangingtheculturecanaffectteachingandlearning:

“[Now]peoplearemorewillingtotrusteachotherandexpresstheirvoice.Thosetwopieceschangedtheconditionsforlearningandteaching.Andwe’renotdone–it’snotperfect–butimprovementsinfoundationalissuesshowwe’vegonefromanadversarialculturetoonethat’scollaborative.Datademonstratesthatpoint–we’reshowingprogress–withbehavior,discipline,andemployeegrievances.”

Page 69: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–63–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

ChallengestotheImplementationofRestorativePracticesDatafrominterviews,focusgroups,surveys,andobservationsindicatetherecontinuestobechallengestotheimplementationofRestorativePracticesatEast.Theonesmostoftenmentionedbyconstituentsare:

• AllteachershavenotyetseenRestorativePracticesinaction.

• Someteachersseetheimpactasshort-lived.

• TeachersdesiremoreopportunitiesforpracticeandtraininginRestorativePractices.

• Staffareconcernedaboutthelackoffidelityandconsistencyofimplementation.

• Teachersstillseealackofstudentaccountabilityandinconsistentresolutions.

• TeachersconsidertheamountoftimeandlogisticsofsettingupacircleorotherRestorativePracticesstrategytobeburdensome.

• Teachersarenotalwaysincludedintherestorativeprocessoritsresolution.

• Studentsarenotfullyinvestedintherestorativeapproach.

• Thefrequencyofparentalinvolvementinrestorativestrategiesislow.

• Therestorativeapproachisadelegatedactivityratherthanleadershipdriven.

TherewereafewteacherswhoexplainedtheyhadnotyetseenRestorativePracticesinactionandafewwhothoughtitwasnotbeingusedtoitscapacity.Someteacherleadersnotedduringafocusgroupbeingfrustratedwiththefidelityoftheimplementation,fearingitwasnotbeingpracticedappropriately.TeachersattheUpperSchoolreportnothavingreceivedadequatesupporttoimplementRestorativePracticesthisyear,withonly38percentrespondingthatto“someoragreatextent”theyreceivedadequatesupport(seeFigure39).Teachersandteacherleadersalsoremarkedabouttheamountoftimeittakestosetupanddoandareconcernedwithalackoffollow-throughorconsequences.SomeexamplesofteachercommentsaboutRestorativePracticesinclude:

“IfeelthatrestorativepracticesisanintegralpartoftheEPOandsuccessofEast,butIhavenotreceivednearlyenoughtrainingtoimplementitwithfidelity.Iwishthiswascoveredmore.”

“It’saprocess–becomingrestorative–it’sbetterthanlastyearbut[wehave]awaystogo.”

“Havenotseenthisusedfully.Teachersarenotincludedintherestorationprocessandtheprocessisoften‘spedup’justtogetstudentsbackintheclassroomsoanalternativeplacementisn’tneededinthatperiod.”

“Theinitialmeetingseemsimportant;however,ifthestudentsfailtocomplywiththeoutcomeofthemeeting,thereisnofollowthroughorconsequence.”

“Ihaveseenstudentconflictssettledownafteruseofrestorativepractices;however,itseemstoonlylast4–6weeks.”

Page 70: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–64–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

Figure39.Extentteachers/staffbelievetheyhavereceivedthesupporttheyneededtoeffectivelyimplementRestorativePracticesthisyear

AlternativeProgramsInanefforttomeettheneedsofallscholarsinitsschoolcommunity,EastdevelopedfouralternativeprogramsinYear1tomeettheneedsofitsmostunderservedstudents,withtwoimplementedon-siteandtwooff-site.Thesefourprograms—Quest,EastEvening,EastBigPicture,andEastFreedomSchool—constitutedtheprimarywayEastintendedtomeettheneedsofstudentswhomightbemoresuccessfulinanalternativeacademicsetting.InYear2ofimplementation,threeoftheseprogramsmovedforward,withEastleadershipchoosingnottoimplementtheon-siteEastEveningprogramasaresultofunder-enrollmentandotherchallengesencounteredinYear1.

Overthecourseoftwoyearsofintensiveimplementation,East’salternativeprogramsenjoyedtheirshareofsuccessesandexperiencedchallengesaswell,whileimplementingmodificationstobettermeetstudentneedsandbolsterprogrameffectiveness.Successes,challenges,andmodificationsofeachofEast’sthreeremainingalternativeacademicprogramsarediscussedbelow,withdatafromteacherandstudentfocusgroups,administratorinterviews,andteacher/staffandadministratorsurveysprovidinginsightandsuggestingsomechanges.

QuestQuestisanon-site,acceleratedcreditrecoveryprogramservingstudentswhoareover-ageandhavea0.0GPAandlessthanoneearnedcredit,orstudentsenteringtheirthirdyearofhighschoolwithnocreditsearned.DesignedbyEast’sCAOinpartnershipwiththeexternalpartnerEncompassasaco-taughtcurriculummeanttobedeliveredindoubleblocks,Questsuccessfullysupportedsomeparticipantsinaccruingcreditsandre-engagedotherswhothrivedintheprogram’sspecialsetting.AlmosthalfofthestudentsinQuestinYear1earnedenoughcreditstoadvancetothe10thgrade.Many

18%

33%

12%

28%

33%

25%

38%

24%

44%

15%

11%

16%

1%

2%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Total

LowerSchool

UpperSchool

PercentofRespondents(Totaln=164)

Toagreatextent-4 3 2 Notatall-1 Don'tknow

Page 71: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–65–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

Year1participantswhoweremeantto“graduate”outofQuestandintoEastUpperSchool’sgeneraleducationprogramaftercompletingoneyearofintensivecourseworkbuiltsuchstrongrelationshipswithQuestfacultystaffthattheywantedtocontinue.Quest2.0wascreatedtoaccommodatethepreferenceofthesescholars.TheoriginalprogramretaineditsinitialpurposeandwasgiventhenameQuest1.0todistinguishitsnewerstudentsfromQuest2.0veterans.

ChallengesaroseinYear1pertainingtobothQuestprogramdesign/structureandbroaderchallengespresentatEast.Questwasdesignedtostartnearly90minuteslaterthantherestofUpperSchooltoenablestudentstoreachclassontime;however,anunexpectedeffectofthatscheduledifferencewasthatQueststudentsproveddisruptiveinthehallwayswhiletheremainingUpperSchoolstudentsattendedblock1classes.Theoriginalprogramwasmeanttohaveaproject-basedlearningcomponentthatwasnotimplementedwithfidelity,anditscorecurriculumwasdifferentfromthatusedelsewherewithinEast.Astudentpopulationwithahigherpercentageofspecialeducationneedsthanoriginallyanticipatedwasenrolledwithoutacorrespondingincreaseinspecialeducationstaff.Inaddition,changesinschoolleadershipresultedinchangesinprogramsupervision.

SeveralprogrammaticchangesweremadeinYear2toresolvethesechallenges:

• Changestothedailyschedule

• Curricularchanges,includingthosedesignedtomeettheneedsofspecialeducationstudents

• Leadershipchanges,includinglessinvolvementofEncompassincurriculum

TheQuestdailyschedulestarttimewasadjustedinYear2toalignwiththatoftheUpperSchooltoeliminatetheproblemofQueststudentsroamingthehallsduringUpperSchoolblock1.However,thischangesimultaneouslyresultedinQuest2.0students’needtoarrivenearly90minutesearlierthantheywereaccustomedto,achallengingadjustmentforsomescholars,illustratedinthequotationsbelow.Additionally,theoriginaldouble-blockstructureoftheQuestschooldaywaschangedtomirrorUpperSchool’smorestandardblockschedule.

“WhenQuestwasintroducedlastyear,Ilikeditbecauseofthehoursweweregiven.Schooldidn’tstartuntil9:30.ItgavemeenoughtimetowakeupandgetpreparedtomakesurethatI’mon-timetoschool.”—Studentfocusgroup

“Itwasalittlehardbecausewe[were]sousedtowakinguparound8andbeingherearound9:30.Thenthehoursswitchedandwehadtochangeourwholewayofworking—wakingupearlier...”—Studentfocusgroup

OneteacherdescribedQuest’sYear1curriculumasmorecloselyresemblinga“topiclist”thanacurriculumdevelopedusingbackwarddesignprinciples.Givenenoughautonomyintheirwork,someQuestteachersadaptedtheEngageNYcurriculumusedelsewhereinEast,wherepossible.Further,project-basedlearningisnotasmuchofafocusthisyear,andanotherchangehasbeentoaddaSupportperiodtostudents’schedules.

Page 72: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–66–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

InYear2,QuestcameunderthesupervisionandoversightofthenewFreshmanAcademydirectoratEastUpperSchool.Thiswasmostlyseenasbeneficialandsupportedthebetterintegrationofstudentsandstaff.

ImpactofQuest

Quest’sdedicatedstaffcontinuestoearnkudosfortheireffortsonbehalfofQuestscholars.AsYear1drewtoaclose,QueststaffandEast’sEncompasspartnerwerepoisedtorenewtheirfocusonscholarattendance.However,informationsharedinarecentEaststafffocusgroupindicatesthattheEncompassrolehasexpandedtoincludea“basicneedsprovider”component—withprogramstaffworkingtoobtainschoolsupplies,warmwinterjackets,andanyothermaterialswhoseabsencemaystandbetweenQueststudentsandschoolattendance,asEast’s“kids’basicneedsareatanall-timehigh.”

Withregardtoacademics,studentssharedthattheyoftenfoundQuestcourseworkchallenging,inboththelevelofdifficultyandtheamountofmaterialcovered,withtheblockscheduleformatpresentingitsownobstacletostayingontopofwork.However,moststudentsreportedrisingtothechallengethroughpersonaldeterminationandthesupportofQueststaff,asthefollowingstudentfocusgroupexchangeillustrates:

“It’slikeyou[haveto]completealotofstuff.Ifyoumissaday?You[aregoingto]misssomestuff.”[Meaning,alotiscoveredoneachdaysooneabsenceamountstoalotofmissedmaterial.]Everydaytheygotyoudoingnewstuff.”

“Alltheclassescouldbechallenging.You’vejustgottopayattentionandgiveityourallandyou’regoingtounderstandit.”

“Sometimesit’soverwhelming.Sometimestheytrytoteachyoualot.Sometimesyou’rereallyfrustratedandyoufeellikewalkingoutoftheclass.”

“Sometimesit’stoofast.Welearnanewtopiceveryday.NotinalltheQuestclassesbutinafewQuestclasses.”

“[Questteacherstry]tothrowtoomuchatyou.Sometimesit’seasyandIgetthroughitlikethis[snapsfingers].Everybody’sgottheirupdaysanddowndays.It’sallaboutstayingfocused.”

StudentsspeakhighlyoftheopportunityQuestaffordsthemtocatchupontheircreditaccrualandthesensethattheQuestprogramsuccessfullypreparesthemtopassteststhatstandbetweenthemandgraduation:

“[Quest]givesusanotheropportunitytogobackwherewearesupposedtobe.”

“Ilike[Quest]becausetheyhelpyoucatchuponyourcredits.WhenIfirststartedQuest…Ihadzerocredits.NowI’vegotalmostten.Soithelpsmealotwithourcredits.That’swhatIREALLYlikeQuestfor.”

Page 73: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–67–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

“Ifeellike[Quest]onlyteach[es]uswhatwereallyneedtoknowforthetest.Certainregularclassesteachyoustuffthat’sreallynotgoingtobeonthetest.Stuffyoudon’tneed.”

StudentsalsosharedanunexpectedoutcomeoftheirparticipationinQuest—increasedmaturity.TheyspokeoftakingmoreresponsibilityandmaturingasaresultoftheirparticipationinQuest.

Newand/orOngoingChallenges

Questwasnotatopicfrequentlymentionedininterviewsorfocusgroupswithteachers,thoughbaseduponstudentfocusgroups,interviews,andsurveydataafewnewandongoingchallengesemerged.

AdministratorssharedthatstudentparticipationinQuestisentirelyvoluntary,withstudentsoptinginiftheydeemitagoodfitfortheiracademicgoals.However,otherEaststaffandstudentsindicatedthatmanystudentsareassigned—or,aswasmorecommonlystated,“putinto”—theprogram.Thisdiscrepancyinthedescriptionofthestudentenrollmentprocessexistedacrossallthreealternativeprograms.

ThereisagenerallackofunderstandingorknowledgeevenamongadministratorsabouttheeffectivenessandimpactofQuest.Resultsfromtheadministratorsurvey(seeFigure40),forexample,indicatethatofthe11administratorswhorespondedtothesurvey,4ofthem(36%)donotknowifQuesthasmettheneedsofstudents,andabout3(27%)thinkithasmetstudentneedstosomeoragreatextent.

Figure40.ExtentofadministratorawarenessofQuestalternativeacademicprogram

50%

18%

18%

18%

20%

9%

18%

30%

36%

36%

18%

9% 36%

36%

45%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

IunderstandthepurposeofEast'sQuestprogram.

Questhasbeeneffectivelyimplemented.

Questhasmettheneedsofmystudents.

Queststudentshaveachievedmoresuccessthantheywouldhaveotherwise.

PercentofRespondents(Totaln=11)

Toagreatextent(4) 3 2 Notatall(1) Idon'tknow

Page 74: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–68–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

BigPictureEastBigPicture(EBP),housedoff-siteanddevelopedundercontractwiththenationalschoolredesignorganization,wasintendedtoenrollstudentswhohadfailed9thgradeduringthe2014–15schoolyear.Designedwithspecialfeatures,includingtwice-dailyadvisoryperiodsandaninternshipcomponent,EBPenrolled50studentsfromEastandanadditional15studentsfromotherRochesterCitySchoolDistrictschoolsthroughaspecialpartnership.EBPwasmeanttodeliverthesame9thgradecurriculumusedonthemainEastcampusinsix48-minuteperiods,fourdayseachweek.Thefifthdaywasreservedforinternshipactivities.Year1yieldedanumberofpromisingearlyresults.EastadministratorsreportedthatEBPstudentsexhibitedahigherdegreeofengagementatEastBigPicturethantheyhadwhileattendingclassesonthemainEastcampus.ProgramstaffwereproudoftherespectfulandinclusiveculturetheyhadestablishedinYear1,whichreportedlyinformedallaspectsofschoolfunction,includingstudentdiscipline.Teacherswereexcitedtohaveafairamountofinputinhowinstructionwasdeliveredandsharedthatthelearningenvironmentwasdynamic,astheywereencouragedtoimplementprogrammaticmodificationsofbenefittotheEBPcommunity.

ThemostpressingchallengesduringEBP’sfirstyearcenteredonpoorstudentattendance,concernsaboutacademicrigor,enrollmentofahighernumberofspecialeducationstudentsthantheprogramwasstaffedtoserve,generalstaffingshortages,limitedstudentinternshipplacements,apersistentlackofresources,andissueswiththeprogram’sphysicalspace.Effortsundertakentoreducesomeofthesechallengesincluded:

• Additionofafull-timeguidancecounselortoEBP’sstaff

• Effortstoimproveattendance

• IncreasedalignmentbetweenacademicprogramsatEastUpperSchoolandEBP

• Effortstoimproveinternshipplacement

Therewasreportedlymixedsuccesswiththeseefforts.EBPteachersinfocusgroupsmentionedbeingobservedbyvariousstafffromEast’smainsite,asoneexample.Somekinksaroseinthoseefforts,astheEastobserversweren’talwaysabletoobservetheBigPicturelessonsfromthebeginning,andEBPteachersweren’taffordedtheopportunityofpost-observationconferenceswiththeirEastobservers,reducingthebenefitteacherswereabletogainfromthem.Teacherssharedthatwiththesealignmentefforts,theyhadlesslatitudetoimplementthecurriculum.Also,whileEBPteachersweresupposedtousethesamecurriculumusedatBigEastbutdeliveringitwithinadifferentschedulestructure,someEBPteachersindicatedthattheydidnothaveaccesstothesamecurriculum.Additionally,EBPcontinuedtostrugglewithinternshipplacements.

Impact

Students’EBPexperienceshavebeenvaried.Infocusgroups,scholarsmentionedthattheywerefaringbetteracademicallyinEBP’ssmallerenvironment.Somestudentsfurthernotedthatcertainclasseswerechallengingforthemwhileotherswereconcernedthattheirclassesoverallweretooeasyandtheyfeltill-preparedforupcomingRegentsexams.StudentsalsomentionedbeingconcernedthatEBPmaynotoffertheclassestheywouldneedinordertoremainintheprogramuntilgraduation.Most

Page 75: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–69–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

consideredtheenvironmentsafeandrelativelyfriendly.Studentsweredividedonthevalueoftheinternshipcomponentoftheprogram.Infocusgroups,studentssharedcommentsabouttheirEBPexperiences:

“[EBP]isasmallerenvironment.Teacherscaremoreandyou’renotasdistractedasyouusedtobe.”[WestEd:Didyouhavethesameexperienceofgettingbettergradesherethanatyouroldschool?]“IwasgettingstraightF’s.I’mgettingbettergradeshere—A’sandB’shere.”

“Ican’tskipclassesIdon’tlikeanymore…Theyjust[stay]ontopofyou.”

“Iwentto[anotherschool]—therewasn’tasmuchhelp[asthereis]here.Theyreallyhelpedmegetmygradesup[here].IndependentWorkTime—yougotoyourteachersifyouneedextrahelp,extraworkandthey’llhelpyouout.Heretheyhelpyoubringyourgradeupandtheyactuallyputyoubackontrack.”

“Theygiveyoualotmoresupporthere.”

“There’smoreroomtofocushereanddoyouworkandstuff.”

“Theyalsotrytohelpyoufindaninternshipforyourcareer.Youcouldworkthereinthefuture.”

Challenges

NewandongoingchallengeswereidentifiedwithEastBigPicture.Thechallengesidentifiedinclude:

• Theenrollmentprocess

• Questionsabouttherigor

• Staffingandprofessionaldevelopment

• Adequateinternships

• LackofclarityaroundthepurposeandtargetpopulationforEBP

• OperationalandresourceschallengessuchasnoaccesstoRCSDinternetanddatasystemsandlackofadedicatedtelephonetoEBP

EaststaffandadministratorsseemunclearonthepurposeoftheEBPprogram,andtherearedifferentexplanationsfromadministratorsandstudentsaboutstudentplacementinEBP.AdministratorssharedthatstudentscanchoosetocometoEBP,andsomemaybecounseledintotheprogram.Infocusgroups,teachersandstudentssharedthatattendingEBPisnotalwayspresentedasachoice.Thefollowingquotationsillustratethesedifferentunderstandings.

“Iwasreally,really,reallyterribleatEast.Iwassobad.Andthen,forawholeyear,Ididn’tgotoschool.Sotheysaid,‘Eitheryoucomehere[EBP]oryoudon’tgotoschool…’.TheysaidIcan’tgobacktoEast.”—Studentfocusgroup

Page 76: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–70–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

“Itwassupposedtobe—weweretold—thatitwassupposedtobebyinterestonly.Andanapplicationprocess”—Teacherfocusgroup

“I’veheardofcaseswherekidswerethreatenedwithBigPicture.‘Ifyoumessup3moretimes,you’regoingtoBigPicture.’...Itjustmakesitharderforus—alotofourkidsalreadyhavehugetrustissuesandthatjuststartsthemoffonthewrongfoot.”—Teacherfocusgroup

Whilesomestudentsfeelthelevelofacademicchallengeisappropriate,othersbelievetherigoranddegreeofRegentspreparationatEBPislacking.Thefollowingquotationsshowsomeofthevariationinopinionontherigorandpreparation:

“…Thisworkwehaveistooeasy.ThenwegettotheRegentsanddon’tknowwhattodo.It’shardtostudyonyourownbecauseyoureallydon’tknowwhat’sgoingtobeonthattest.”

“Theytaketimeoutoftheirdaytohelpusgetthroughschool.”[“Right.”].“Theycareaboutus.Theywantustopass.”

EBPteachersdescribedtheirprofessionallearningexperiencesascenteredonstructuralcomponentsoftheBigPictureprogram,whilenotincludingenoughtimeoncontentareaorinstructionalpractices.EBPteachersandstaffalsoworriedaboutvacanciesinstaffing,whichtheyfeelnegativelyaffectstheoperationandqualityoftheprogram.

“ThePDhere—whichwehaveonWednesdayafternoons—inmyopinionisallaboutadvisory/internship.We’reveryrarelyallowedtoconcentrateonanythingregardingtheacademicsorcurriculumeventhoughwewantrigor.”

Teachers,students,andadministratorsmentionedchallengeswiththeinternshipcomponentoftheBigPictureprogram.Teachersandstudentswereconcernedaboutthepositionoftheinternshipinthemiddleoftheweek.Administratorsandteacherswerealsoconcernedaboutthedifficultyofgettingenoughappropriateinternshipsforstudents.Theysharedsomethoughtsonthissubjectinfocusgroups:

“Idon’tliketheWednesdayinternships.I’minthisschoolbecauseobviouslysomethingwasn’tgoingrightatmyschool.Soyou’regoingtogiveusanextrathingwe’vegottodowhenthatWednesdaywecouldactuallybedoingschoolwork?I’mherebecauseIwasn’tdoinggoodatmyotherschoolwithmyacademics.NowI’mhereandIhave4daysoflearningwhileotherpeoplehave5?That’snotfair.”—Studentfocusgroup

“Anotherchallengingthingistheprocessofgettinganinternship.Ittookmadlongtogetaninternship.”—Studentfocusgroup

AnticipatedChangestoBigPictureforYear3

TheownerofthebuildinginwhichEBPiscurrentlylocatedhassoldtheproperty,requiringEBPtorelocate.Planstomovetoanewsiteremainunfinalized.OneadministratorsharedEBPwillbebrought

Page 77: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–71–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

backtotheEastcampusforthenextschoolyearandthattheprogramwillbephasedoutafterthe2017–18schoolyearwithanewprogramdevelopedtobettermeettheneedsofthetargetstudents.TheprimaryreasonforthischangeisdissatisfactionwiththeBigPicturecontractandassessmentthattheprogramisnotreallymeetingtheneedsofstudentsandtheschool.

EastFreedomSchoolEastFreedomSchool(EFS)isapre-GEDprogram,createdincollaborationwithlocaldevelopmentorganizationNorthEastAreaDevelopment,Inc.(NEAD,)whichaimstoprepareEFSstudentsforsuccessintheGEDprogramoftheirchoice.MostofEFS’scourseworkiscompletedwiththeaidofone-on-onesupportreinforcedwithindependentpractice.Therewereapproximately30registeredstudentsduringthe2015–16schoolyear.EFShashistoricallyenrolledthemostdisenfranchisedscholarsintheEastcommunity,includingthosewhohavebeendisengagedoroutofschoolforlongperiodsoftime.Thesestudentsaretakingadvantageofapathforwardthathasnotalwaysbeenavailabletothem.AnEastadministratorasserted:

“We’vestartedtoincreaseenrollment[inFreedomSchool]whichmeansthatkidsthatwouldhavenormallyjustdroppedoutandgivenupseethatthisisaviableoptionforthem.Ithinkthathasmadeatremendousdifference.WeallknowthattheycancompletetheTASCandgotoMonroeCommunityCollege(MCC)oranycollege,justlikeakidwhograduatesfrom[BigEast]does.Ithink[FreedomSchool]offerselementstokidsthat[have]previouslynotbeenpushedenough.”

Challenges

Aswiththeotheralternativeprograms,theabsenceofaformalprocessforstudentenrollmenthasprovenchallengingforEastFreedomSchool,ashasspottyattendanceonthepartofsomeenrollees.Havingadequatematerialsandresourceshasalsobeenchallengingfortheprogram.

OverallImpact/SuccessesofEastFreedomSchool

SeveralEastUpperSchooladministratorshavevoicedthesentiment,“IfevenonestudentearnshisorherTASCcredentialasaresultofFreedomSchoolparticipation,wehavebeensuccessful.”EFShasbeensuccessfulseveraltimesoverbythatsimplemeasure,asthreestudentshavemetthatthreshold.EFShasenjoyedsuccessalonganumberofotherdimensions.Programstaffnotedstudents’incrementalgainsindecision-making,personalaccountabilityandabilitytodohigherlevelcoursework.Onaverage,students’EFSattendanceishigherthantheirattendancewhileat“BigEast,”thoughstillnothigh.Students’specialneeds,suchastheneedforchildcare,areaccommodatedtotheextentpossibleatEFSsothatunnecessaryabsencesareavoided.Studentsandtheirparentsraveabouttheprogram,incontrasttowhattheyhavetosayaboutEast’smainacademicprogram,which,inmostcases,wasexperiencedpre-EPO.Furthermore,studentsandtheirfamilieshaveforgedastrongrelationshipwithprogramstaff,speakinghighlyoftheseeminglyround-the-clocksupportthemaininstructorprovides,asthefollowingquotationsillustrate:

“IgotafamilyoutofFreedomSchool—wehelponeanother.”—Studentfocusgroup

Page 78: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–72–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

“FreedomSchoolworkswithyouinwhateveryourindividualstruggleareais.”—Studentfocusgroup

“FreedomSchoolenvironmentisquiet,nottooloudortoomuchfusslikeanormalhighschool.”—Studentfocusgroup

“[AtFreedomSchool]Icouldbringmy[child]ondaysIdidn’thavechildcare.”—Studentfocusgroup

“Iseeabigchangeinmy[scholar]sinceshestartedatFreedomSchool.Sheopensupmorewhenyoutalktoher—she’llcometomeifsheishavingaproblem.Shehasarealbondwith[FSprogramteacher/admin].Whenshedoesn’thavearide[toschool],[FSwillprovideone].Eastisnotgoingtogothatextramile.”—FreedomSchoolparentfocusgroup

“FreedomSchoolisheretolistenandtohelp.Eastdoesn’tpayattention.”—FreedomSchoolparentfocusgroup

“FreedomSchoolhasbeensohelpful—helpwithfindingjobs…smallfieldtrips[that]openedupmyson’smindtodifferentoptions.”

FamilyandCommunityEngagementTheoriginalEPOplanincludedstrategiestoincreaseparent/familyparticipationatEastgiventhelongstandingstruggletobringparentsandfamiliesintotheschool.Ontheotherhand,communityorganizationsandagencieshavelongpartneredwithEastHighSchooltoprovideassistancetostudents,teachers,andfamilies.TheEPOplanintendedtocontinueandexpandthesepartnershipsthathadproventobemakingvaluablecontributions,andtoinvolvenewpartnerstosupportspecificinitiativesatEast.SoonafterthebeginningoftheEPOatEast,theEPOmergedEast’sCommunityEngagementTeamwithitsFamiliesandCommunityEngagementCommittee(FACE).FACEmeetsregularlyandincludesrepresentationfromstakeholdersandpartnerorganizationssuchastheRochesterTeachers’Association;parents;LowerSchool,UpperSchool,andFreshmanAcademyprincipals;representativesofvariouscommunityagencies;aswellastheMayor’soffice.SinceFACEappearstoworkcloselywithpartnersandfamilies,wehavecombinedthesetwoareasforthepurposeofthisreport.

TheinvolvementofcommunitypartnersintheEastEPOisamultifacetedaspectwithmanymovingparts.Somepartnerorganizationshaveapresenceintheschool,suchastheAmeriCorpsvolunteers,Iberopersonnel,andthestaffoftheStudentSupportCenter.Otherpartnersaresituatedintheneighborhoodorinnearbycommunities.TheextenttowhichpartnerorganizationscollaborateandcoordinatetomeettheneedsoftheEastEPOconstituentsisimpressive.OneschoolleadernotedtheFACEcommitteeismakingeffortstominimizetheburdenofcoordinatingandstreamliningpartnerandfamilyengagementactivities:“We’retryingtoorganizehowwedofamilyandcommunityengagementsoit’snotpersondependent…creatingdocumentsandguidelinesshowinghowit’ssupposedtobedone.”Twocommitteemembershavecreatedacommunicationplanthatwillbeontheschoolwebsite.

Page 79: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–73–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

Findingsaboutparentengagementandpartnerinvolvementarebasedoninterviewswithschoolleadersandadministrators;focusgroupswithpartners,counselors,andsocialworkers;andresponsesfromstudentandteacher/staffsurveys.Dataweregatheredfromadministrators,teachers,students,andpartnersthemselvesinanefforttounderstandandassesstheimpactofpartnershipsontheprogressoftheEPO.ThedatasuggestthatcommunitypartnersareavitalcomponentoftheturnaroundeffortsandalsoverifythatcollaborationandcoordinationofpartnerswiththerolesandeffortsofEaststaffhavebecomestrongerandclearertotheteachers,students,andfamiliestheyserve.

TheFACECommitteeTheFACEcommitteehasbeenworkingwellandhasmadestrategicdecisionsthisyeartoenableamoreprocess-orientedstructure.Thecommitteecreatedamanualthatidentifiesprocessesandprocedures,suchasensuringmeetingnoticesaresentwellinadvance,andthatthank-youcardsgooutwhensomeoneattendsanevent.Effortsarealsobeingmadetoadvertisetheactivitiesforparentssothattheyaremorevisible.Moreparentworkshopsareplannedforthesummermonthsandnextyear,andthesewillincludetopicsrequestedbyparentsratherthanbeingstaff-directed,suchasbringingingrandparentswhoneedtoknowthestagesofdevelopmentforkids,astherearemanyhouseholdsheadedbygrandparentsinRochester.Workshopsthathelpparentspreparetheirtaxesandlearnhowtoapplyforcollegeandfinancialaidwillcontinue.TheschoolalsoaddedaSpanishlanguagededicatedphonelinetoincreaseaccessibilitytoallparents.

ParentEngagementTeachers,schoolleaders,counselors,andsocialworkers,aswellascommunitypartners,allvalueparentengagement,butacknowledgethatitisanongoingstruggleatEast.Accordingtoteacher/staffsurveydata,overhalftherespondentsdidnotthinktherewasaclearplanforengagingfamiliesatEast,nordotheythinkthestrategiesbeingusedhavebeeneffective(seeTable4).However,8of12administratorsreportedlookingatdatawithparents/guardiansofstudents,and10of12administratorsagreedparentsweremadeawareofexpectationsforstudentbehaviorthisyear.

Page 80: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–74–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

Table4.Teacherandstaffperspectivesonparentengagement

LowerSchool UpperSchool

StronglyAgree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly

Disagree

Don’tK

now

StronglyAgree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly

Disagree

Don’tK

now

Parentsareseenaskeypartnersinourschoolimprovementefforts.

13.3%

(n=6)

60.0%

(n=27)

15.6%

(n=7)

6.7%

(n=3)

4.4%

(n=2)

15.8%

(n=16)

41.6%

(n=42)

25.7%

(n=26)

10.9%

(n=11)

5.9%

(n=6)

MostteachersvalueparentinvolvementatEast.

33.3%

(n=15)

62.2%

(n=28)

4.4%

(n=2)

0.0%

(n=0)

0.0%

(n=0)

28.7%

(n=29)

60.4%

(n=51)

5.9%

(n=6)

4.0%

(n=4)

1.0%

(n=1)

Eastleadershipvaluesparentinvolvement.

37.8%

(n=17)

55.6%

(n=25)

2.2%

(n=1)

0.0%

(n=0)

4.4%

(n=2)

35.0%

(n=35)

56.0%

(n=56)

6.0%

(n=6)

2.0%

(n=2)

1.0%

(n=1)

ThereisaclearplanforengagingfamiliesatEast.

4.4%

(n=2)

40.0%

(n=18)

35.6%

(n=16)

0.0%

(n=0)

20.0%

(n=9)

6.9%

(n=7)

28.7%

(n=29)

38.6%

(n=39)

14.9%

(n=15)

10.9%

(n=11)

Strategiesforinvolvingparentsareeffective.

6.7%

(n=3)

28.9%

(n=13)

46.7%

(n=21)

6.7%

(n=3)

11.1%

(n=5)

2.0%

(n=2)

13.0%

(n=13)

49.0%

(n=49)

25.0%

(n=25)

11.0%

(n=11)

Fifty-twoteachersandstaffrespondedtoanopen-endedsurveyquestionaskingforsuggestions/ideastoimprove/increaseparentengagementatEast.Inadditiontocontinuingtoschedulefamilyfunnights,providefood,andplansocial/sportingevents,theysuggestedconsidering:

• Providingtransportationandchildcare

• Moretranslationoflettershomeandmoretranslatorson-siteatevents

• Morehomevisits

• Encouragingco-carentstobeintouchwithparents

• Morediverseschedule/changearrangementsforparent/teacherconferences

• IncludingparentsinRestorativePracticesandre-entrymeetings

• Notmailingstudentgrades,requiringparentstocomein

• Morescholarshowcasenightsandmorestudent-ledconferences

• Engagingparentsof6thgradersearlyon

Studentswereaskedaboutwhethertheschoolkeepsparentsinformedaboutwhatisgoingonatschool.StudentsattheLowerandUpperSchoolrespondedsimilarly:74percentofLowerSchool

Page 81: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–75–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

studentsand71percentofUpperSchoolstudentseitheragreedorstronglyagreedwiththatstatement(seeFigure41).

Figure41.Extentstudentsbelievetheschoolkeepsparent/guardianinformedaboutwhatisgoingonatschool,suchasevents

AtLowerSchool,effortshavebeenintensifiedthisyeartoimproveparentparticipationandengagement,andtheprogresshasbeendocumented.Oneadministratorshared:

“We’vebeenveryintentionalinwhatwedoforfamiliesandhowweincludethem.WehavetheStatecomingThursdaytodothatpieceofourreview,sowe’vebeencollectingalotofdataandevidenceonwhatwe’vedonedifferentlythisyear.Wepairallofoureventssoparentscomeinaboutonceamonthformultiplethings–aconcert,parent/teacherconference,awardceremonyallonthesamenight–afewdrawstogettheminhere.Wedidatleast181homevisitsatLowerSchoolalone.”

ANewcomers’AcademywasheldthisyearduringtheFebruarybreakandreceivedravereviewsfromparents.TheSpanishandbilingual(ENL)studentsweretakenintothecommunitytodifferentRochesterlandmarkssuchastheEastmanandSusanB.Anthonymuseums.TheydidaprojectafterthatandmadeclaimsaboutwhowasthebestRochesterhistorian;theythendidapresentationandusedallthelanguageoftheRegents.“Itwasfantastic,andparentsweresuperhappyaboutthekidscomingtothat.”

Anotheractivitythatwaswell-receivedandwell-attendedwasforthoseparentswhowerenewtothiscountry.EastcollaboratedwithIbero,acommunity-basedorganization,foraparenteveningconductedinSpanishwheregraduationrequirementsandhowthesystemworkswerearticulatedandexplained.Anadministratornoted:“Isaweachofthoseparentsattheschool-wideopenhousethenextweek–averydirectimpact.”Acommunityfairwasheldearlierintheyearsoparentscouldnetworkwithcommunityagenciesanditwasconsideredverysuccessful.AnEastFACEcommitteememberstated:

24%

26%

47%

48%

12%

10%

5%

5%

12%

12%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

UpperSchool

LowerSchool

PercentofRespondents

StronglyAgree Agree Disagree StronglyDisagree Don'tKnow

Page 82: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–76–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

“Weareputtingourselvesouttherefortheneighborhoodtoseeusasaplacetocomeandvisitandbeknown–andalsoprovideorganizationswiththeopportunitytonetworkwitheachother.”

Oneschoolleaderemphasizedthatparentscanshowsupportinwaysotherthanattendingschoolevents:

“Ithinkwhatisoftenamythorafallacytotheoutsideis[parent]attendanceatevents—thatifyoudon’thavegreatattendanceataPPDmeetingorbasketballgame,youdon’thaveparentsupport.Inreality,parentscansupportinmultipleways.Ithinkyou’dhearthevastmajorityofstaffsay,‘Anytimewecallforaparent,they’rewillingtohelpus.’Webothwantthesamething—successfortheirchild.Iwouldcautionthattherealvalueofparentinvolvementisnotattendinganevent.Therealvalueisworkinginpartnershipwithuswheneverwecall—andevenwhenwedon’tcall.”

ThefollowingquotationfromanadministratorsumsupacommonsentimentaboutparentengagementatEast:

“Ithinkwe’vemadesomestrides–definitelyanareaofneedandconcernbutwehavesomebrightspots…andit’sgettingbetter.”

BenefitsofWorkingwithCommunityPartnersInadditiontocoordinatingparentengagement,FACEalsocoordinatescommunitypartners.MostteachersunderstandtheroleofkeypartnersatEast,andconsiderpartnershipsveryvaluabletotheEPOefforts;andmostbelievepartnershaveenhancedfamily/schoolconnectionsandhavehelpedtomeetspecificneedsofstudentsorfamilies(seeTable5).Nearlyalladministrators“agreedorstronglyagreed”thatkeypartnersarehighlyvaluedatEast,haveenhancedfamily/schoolconnectionsthisyear,andhavehelpedtomeetspecificneedsofstudentsorfamilies.Teachers/staffalsoindicatedtherearemanysupportsinthebuildingprovidedbycommunityagenciesandpartnerstowhichtheyareabletoreferscholars.Theydescribepartnersasveryapproachableandwillingtohelpwithchallenges.Insomeinstances,itistheoutsideagenciesthathaveaddedacademicandemotionalsupportforstudents.Forexample,theStudentSupportCentercanhelpstudentswithhousing,clothing,emotionalsupport,andtrauma.Hillsidedoestutoring,asdoesReinvestinginYouth.Administratorsidentifiedsomeofthebenefitstohavingvibrantcommunitypartnerships:

“CommunityconnectionsgivescholarsasenseoftheimportanceoftheireducationbeyondthewallsofEast.”

“TherearelotsofprogramsandexternalpartnerseachwiththeirownuniquenichethatallowsEasttonarrowinonandmeetthespecificneedsastudentorfamilymightbestrugglingwith.”

Page 83: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–77–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

Table5.Teacher/staffperspectivesoncommunitypartners

LowerSchool UpperSchool

Strongly

Agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly

Disagree

Don’t

Know

Strongly

Agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly

Disagree

Don’t

Know

CommunitypartnersarevaluedatEast.

24.4%(n=11)

62.2%(n=28)

2.2%(n=1)

0.0%(n=0)

11.1%(n=5)

23.8%(n=24)

57.4%(n=58)

7.9%(n=8)

1.0%(n=1)

9.9%(n=10)

Communitypartnershaveenhancedfamily/schoolconnectionsthisyear.

20.0%(n=9)

55.6%(n=25)

4.4%(n=2)

0.0%(n=0)

20.0%(n=9)

23.8%(n=24)

52.5%(n=53)

5.9%(n=5)

1.0%(n=1)

16.8%(n=17)

Partnershipswithexternalorganizationshavehelpedtomeetspecificneedsofstudentsorfamilies.

13.3%(n=6)

57.8%(n=26)

6.7%(n=3)

0.0%(n=0)

22.2%(n=2)

24.8%(n=25)

50.5%(n=51)

8.9%(n=9)

1.0%(n=1)

14.9%(n=15)

Someofthewaysthatpartnershaveservedstudentsthisyearare(1)LowerSchoolstudentsenjoyedvisitsfromtheSmilemobile–amobiledentallabprovidedbyEastmanDentalSchoolforstudentstohavetheirteethcleanedandcavitiesfilled,(2)anewpartnershipthroughtheUniversityofRochester’sHealthDepartmenthasprovidedbreakfastforLowerSchoolstudentsintheirclassrooms,(3)anadditionalsocialworkerhasbeenaddedforLowerSchoolstudentswhohaveexperiencedseveretrauma,and(4)anewpartnershipwithSOARwasinitiatedthroughtheCityofRochesterwhereinahealtheducatorhastalkedtostudentsabouthealthaswellasemotionalandsexualrelationships.

AlsonewthisyearistheAttendanceInitiative,whichprovidestheassistanceofspecificpartnerstoassistintrackingdownandconnectingwithabsentstudentsandtheirfamilies.Anadministratorstated:“Wemeetalltogetherweekly--partners,socialworkers,andcounselorsandourattendanceclerk.Thereason[this]ismoreeffectiveisbecausenowwecancoordinatewho’sworkingwithwho–identifythestudentswithattendanceissuesandmakeareferralimmediatelytotheagencytosupportthem…thecoordinationismuchbetterthanlastyear.”

Studentsalsosharedtheimportanceofpartnerships.Inthestudentsurveys,themajorityofrespondentsindicatedawarenessofthecommunitypartners.Onestudentshared:

“StudentSupportCenter,that’slikemysafeplace…theplaceIalwaysgowhenIhaveaproblem.I’veknownthecounselorssinceIwasabout12.TheyworkwiththeCenterforYouthsothere’sdifferentthingstheycanhelpyouwith…likeifyouneedhousingoryou

Page 84: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–78–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

needtoleaveyourhouseforawhile…oranything;they’realwaysthere,they’reSOsupportiveaslongasyou’redoingwhatyou’vegottodo.Like,ifyoudon’thavefoodinyourhouse,theyhavefoodthere.Theyhaveclothing,theyhavethingsthere,soit’sareallygoodplace.Iftheywereevertakenout,Iwouldcry.”—Student

ChallengesofParentandCommunityEngagementVeryfewchallengeswerenotedbystakeholderswithrespecttoworkingwithpartnerorganizations.Infact,itwasfrequentlynotedthattherolesofpartnershavebeenclarified,makingiteasierforschoolstafftoaccesstheappropriateonestoserviceastudentorfamilyinneed.Partners,duringafocusgroup,didmentionthatsometimescommunicationisachallenge,suchaslatenoticesofeventstheycouldattendorassistwith.Sometimesanagencyhasopenslotstoacceptfamiliesorstudentsforservices,butthelengthyresponsetimefromEastcaneliminateanopportunity.Anotherpartnersharedthatitisdifficulttocoordinateandadequatelyrecordparentswhoattendaneventattheschoolbecausetheysometimesuseanentranceotherthanwheretheregistrationdeskislocated.Oftenmorethanoneeventisscheduledsothissituationisexacerbatedwhennumerousdoorsareopenandnotmonitored.

OnememberofFACEsharedalessonlearnedthroughworkingcloselywiththeEPOparent/communityengagementtenet:“IthinkithastobeamorecoordinatedeffortinYear1…tohaveengagedparentsattheearliestpossiblemoment…fromthetimeyouopenthatdoor…orelseyou’reconstantlyplayingcatchuptobringthemtothetable.”

EastintheCommunityInadditiontoeffortstobringthecommunityandcommunitypartnersintoEast,Eastisalsopushingoutintothecommunity.East’ssuperintendentcontinuestobeactivelyinvolvedinthecommunitytofurthertheideaoftheCommunitySchoolmodelandtocreateasupportsystembeyondacademicsthatmeetsotherneedsofstudentsandfamilies,suchaspovertyrelief,internships,andjobs.Oneleaderstated:“Hehasdevelopedincrediblerelationshipswithalotoftheplayersinthecommunitythatdefinitelyindicatesprogress.”ThesuperintendentandLowerSchooladministratorsareworkingtobuildpartnershipswithotherschoolsthatfeedstudentstoEast.TeachersalsonotedthatthenegativeviewofEastischangingasaresultofthisoutreach,aswellasfrompublicityfromtheUniversityofRochester.

Page 85: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–79–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

Chapter3StudentOutcomes[TobecompletedwhenYear2dataareavailablefromRCSDinAugustorSeptember]

• Eastoverall,lookingatchangetwoschoolyears

• 7thgradeanalysis

- Progressandachievementof7thgradersatEast:promotionofnew7thgradersto8thgrade,scoresonstateassessments,absenteeism,andin-schoolsuspensions.

- Acomparativeanalysisoffirst-time9thgradersatEastadvancingto10thgrade,Regentstakenandpassed,creditsearnedandabsenteeismtofirst-time9thgradersinotherRCSDschools.

• 9thgradeanalysis

- Progressandachievementof9thgradersatEast:promotionofnew9thgradersto10thgrade,creditsearned,GPA,Regentstaken,Regentspassed,absenteeism,andin-schoolsuspensions.

- Acomparativeanalysisoffirsttime9thgradersatEastadvancingto10thgrade,Regentstakenandpassed,creditsearned,GPA,andabsenteeismtofirsttime9thgradersinotherRCSDschools.

• Discussionofdatachallenges

Page 86: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–80–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

Chapter4Conclusions/Recommendations/ReflectionsYear2broughtcontinuedadjustmentandprogress,aswellassomechallengestotheimplementationoftheEastEPO.TheevidencepresentedinthisreportsuggeststhatEastismakingprogresstowarditsgoalsofschoolimprovement.Itissometimesfrustratingtostakeholdersthatquantitativeoutcomedatalagbehindtheeffortsthatteachers,staff,administrators,andpartnersaremaking.Oneareaoffocusthatcouldpotentiallyhaveapositiveimpactontheoutcomedataistodramaticallyincreaseattendance.Thereisonlyoneattendanceofficer,yetoneofthemostcommonrefrainssharedbyteachers,andsomeadministrators,isthatthestudentscannotlearnandcannotpasstheRegentsiftheyarenotinclass.Thoughthisyearsawadditionaleffortstoassessstrategiesbeingusedtolowerabsenteeism,moreisneededinorderfortheextensiveeffortstotransformteachingandraisecurriculumrigortofullyimpactstudentsuccess.

Itcanbeeasytolosesightoftheaccomplishmentswhenlivingtheday-to-daychallengesofimplementation.Belowwesummarizethekeyaccomplishmentsandchallengesdiscussedingreaterdetailthroughoutthereport.

Leadership

• InYear2,theEPOOversightCommitteehassteppedbackintomoreofanoversightroleandislessinvolvedintheday-to-dayoperationoftheschool.Thisshowsconfidenceintheschool-basedadministrativeteam.

• TeachersalsoreportedahighlevelofconfidenceintheorganizationoftheEPOandschoolleadershipstructure.ThismaybebecauseeffortsweremadeinYear2toclarifytheschool-levelleadershiprolesandresponsibilitiesandtoimprovecommunication.Communicationisstillaworkinprogress,however,andmoreimprovementincommunicationfromthehighestlevelstotheclassroomisindicated.

• Thedistributedleadershipmodelisgrowing,withmoreteachersandteacherleaderssteppingupforinformalleadership.Someteachersandadministrators,however,viewdistributedleadershipwithmixedfeelings,believingitonlybenefitsthosewhoarewillingtospeakuporwhoarego-getters.

• TheleadershiproleoftheChiefAcademicOfficerwasviewedasindispensabletotheschoolbecauseitallowsalaser-likefocusoninstruction.

• TheinvolvementoftheUniversityofRochesterisperceivedasbringingmanyresources,particularlytosupportprofessionallearningandinstruction.TheinvolvementofURhasalsocontributedtohelpingtoimprovethegeneralreputationofEast.

ProfessionalLearning

Page 87: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–81–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

• Extensiveprofessionallearningisprovidedforteachers,andmostofitisviewedpositively.Professionallearningisdescribedasintense,andifCPTparticipationisincluded,occursdaily.CollaborativePlanningTimeisimportanttotheEPOmodel.Teachersandadministratorsseethebenefitofgettingtogetherdailyforteacherstoengageinprofessionalconversationsand/ortolookatdata.Thereisroomforimprovementinthemodeltoensureitiseffectiveandimpactfulacrosstheboard,asteachersdescribedgreatvariabilityinthequalityoftheirCPTs.Forexample,ContentCPTisseenasmorerelevanttomostteachers,whileIDCPTservesthepurposeofinformationsharingandtrackingstudents.TeachersattheLowerSchoolappeartovalueCPTmorethanUpperSchoolteachers.EvaluatorsobservedhigherqualityCPTsinYear2comparedtoYear1,notingCPTsweremoreorganized,focusedoninstruction,usedcommonlanguage,andwereledbycoaches.Someteachersdesirelesscoach-drivenandmoreactualteacher-teachercollaborationinCPT.TheEPOandschoolleadersmightalsoconsiderwaystoimprovethevalueofIDCPTtoteachers.TheymaywanttoconsiderenablingstafftoobservemoreeffectiveIDCPTs,ordocumentingthepracticesofespeciallyeffectiveIDCPTs.

LearningTargets

• ImprovementswereobservedinthenumberandqualityofLearningTargetsbeingdevelopedorusedthisyear.TeachersarebeginningtoseethepotentialpowerandimpactofLearningTargetstoenhanceteachingandsupportlearning.

• GiventheextensiveprofessionallearningfocusedonLearningTargetsinYear2,theschoolshouldexpecttoseeevenbetterandmoreusableonesnextyear.

TeacherLeaders

• Teacherleadersaredescribedasintegraltotheworkoftransformingteachingandsupportingteachers.Teachersdescribedsomevariabilityinthequalityandeffectivenessoftheircoaches,butoverall,teachersrespectcoachesandvaluewhattheydo.Teacherleadershelpsustainwhatistaughtinprofessionallearningtobuildteachercapacity.

• Throughteacherleadereffortsthisyearandtheclarificationoftheirroles,theeffectivenessofCPTappearstobeenhancedthisyear.

Assessment

• Thecommonformativeassessments(CFAs)andembeddedperformanceassessmentswerereceivedwithmixedreviewsandsuccess.Therewerechallengestoimplementation,andteachersfeltliketheywereconstantlyreinventingthewheelwiththeirCFArubrics.

• AttheendofYear2,teachers,ingeneral,werenotconvincedofthevalueofCFAsandperformanceassessments.

Page 88: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–82–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

TeacherPractices

• Therehasbeenmuchefforttotransformteaching.Evaluatorsobservedmorecontentinstructioninclasses,thoughmostinstructionisteacherdirectedwithlittleopportunityforstudentstoworkcollaboratively.Studentswereobservedengagedinmakingmeaningoftheirlearning,buttherewaslittleengagementwithotherstudentsaroundmakingmeaning.

Curriculum

• Surveyresultsshowahighlevelofself-reportedfidelityofimplementationofthecurriculum,thoughitwasreportedtonotbeuniversal.Itisimportanttofurtherexplorewhatiskeepingteachersfromimplementingwithhigherfidelity.

Support

• TheSupportperiodissuchakeycomponentoftheEastEPO,althoughithasbeenimplementedwithvaryingdegreesofsuccessattheUpperandLowerSchoolsthisyear.

• TheUpperSchoolre-envisionedSupportthisyear.Throughanewlyorganizedleadershipstructure,greaterclarityaroundrolesandresponsibilities,andbettercoordinationwithclassroomteachers,greatersuccessinSupportRoomswasevident.

• AttheLowerSchool,Supportisviewedasamixedsuccess,withsomeseeingitashelpful,butothersseeingitasastudyhall.

• ThosestudentswhoarescheduledinSupport,atboththeUpperandLowerSchools,overwhelminglybelieveitisimportanttotheirsuccess.

FreshmanAcademy

• FreshmanAcademywasviewedasasuccessfulinitiativeafterYear1withlittleneedforchange.Somesuggestedchangesincludedincreasedstudenttrackingandprogressmonitoringandincreasedexposureofstudentstocollegesandotheroff-campusopportunities.

• FreshmanAcademystillexperiencedchallengeswithattendanceandisnotyetmeetingitsgoalsforcreditaccrualandRegentspassrates.

FamilyGroup

• SignificantchangesweremadetoFamilyGroupthisyearandarewidelyconsideredbeneficial.

• ThereremainsometeacherswhodonotfeelthatfacilitatingFamilyGroupispartoftheirroleasteachers,andsomeareconcernedtheymaynothavetherightqualificationstobestmeettheneedsofallstudentsinFamilyGroup.SomealsoquestionedwhetherFamilyGroupwasreallystructuredtomeetthe80percentplay,20percentworkguidelines.

Page 89: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–83–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

• Students,teachers,staff,andadministratorsallreportbetterrelationshipsbetweenstudentsandadultsintheschoolasaresultofFamilyGroup.Havingco-carentsalsomadeadifference,asdidschool-wideactivitiesandgroupingstoaddressthespecificneedsofcertainstudentpopulations.FamilyGroupisseenassupportingstudents’needsacademicallyandsocially.

• RecommendationsforimprovingFamilyGroupinclude:

- IncreasingthedegreetowhichFamilyGroupisstudent-ledtoincreasestudentengagementandbuy-in.

- FindingwaystocontinuetoinjectflexibilityintotheFamilyGroupcurriculum,orsupportcarentsinexploringtheflexibilitythatalreadyexists,tospurstudentengagementwhereitislacking.

- ExaminingwhetherFamilyGrouplessonplansaredevelopmentallyandage-appropriateforscholars;assistingcarentsinmodifyingasappropriate.

RestorativePractices

• RestorativePracticesarealsocentraltotheEastEPOmodel.Ingeneral,teachers,staff,andadministratorsbelieveRestorativePracticesareimportant,buttherearemixedexperiencesandperspectivesontheusefulnessandsuccesstodate.

• Ingeneral,however,mostteachers,staff,andadministratorswouldcreditRestorativePracticeswithbeinganoverallbenefittotheschool,supportingamorepositivecultureandclimate.

• RestorativePracticesarebecomingmoreingrainedinthewaysteachersandstudentswork.

• TeachersandstaffcouldusemoretrainingonRestorativePracticesandwouldliketoseeitusedatalllevelsintheschool,notjustwithstudents.

AlternativePrograms

• TheEPOincludesdifferentprogramstomeetthevariedneedsofstudentswhowereeitherdisengaged,outofschool,over-aged,and/orundercredit.

• Teachersingeneralandsomeadministratorshadlimitedawarenessofeachalternativeprogram’spurposeandstudenteligibilitycriteria,whichhasresultedintheassignmentofstudentswhoaren’talwaysabestfitfortheprogram.Italsocontributestotheviewingoftheseprogramsbysomestaffasaplacewhere“kidswhodon’twanttolearn”—orwhopresentotherattendanceorengagementchallenges—canbedeposited.

• Questisseenassuccessful,withevidenceofstudentscatchinguponcredits.IthasexpandedinYear2.QuestistheprogrammostintegratedintoEast,andthismayhavesomethingtodowithitssuccess.

Page 90: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–84–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

• FreedomSchool,whichaddressesthetoughestpopulationofstudentsformerlyoutofschool,operatesquiteindependentlyfromEast.ProgressatFreedomSchoolcomesinsmallstepsthatarehardtoquantify.

• EastBigPicturehasnotbeenassuccessfulastheotherprograms.Thechallengesincludedconcernsthatthestudentsenrolledwerenotnecessarilyagoodfit,concernsaboutthefacility/location,andconcernsabouttheprogrammodelitself.

• ThereweredifferingviewsonwhetherthealternativeprogramspresentedrigorouscurriculathatpreparedstudentsfortheRegentsexams.

• TheEPOmaywanttoconsideradditionalfocusgroupswithstudentsinalternativeprograms,andtheirparents,toensureprogramsaremeetingtheirneedsanddesignedinwaysthatenticeattendance,andthattakeintoconsiderationthecomplexitiesoftheirlives,inadditiontomeetingtheiracademicneeds.

ParentEngagement

• ParentengagementbytraditionalmeasurescontinuestobechallengingforEast.

• Despiteparentsnotcomingtoevents,teachersandadministratorsreportparentsrespondtocallsandaregenerallysupportive.

• Teachers,staff,andadministratorsvalueparentsandseethemaspartnersintheschoolcommunity.

CommunityPartners

• ThereisextensivecommunitypartnerinvolvementinEast.Theyprovidemanyadditionalservicesandresourcesforstudentsandtheirfamilies.Theinvolvementofpartnersisstrategictomeetspecificneeds.

• Thisyearsawincreasedcoordinationandcollaborationwithpartners.

EastintheCommunity

• Inadditiontopartnerscomingintotheschool,Eastisoutinthecommunity.TheSuperintendentservesontheboardofseveralcommunityorganizations,isfrequentlyaskedtoserveoncommittees,andattendsmanyeventsasthefaceofEast.ThishelpstobuildthereputationofEast,andalsobringsattentiontotheschool’simprovementefforts.

ReflectionsonYear2TheEastEPOturnaroundeffortisambitiousandcomplex.Thefirstyearofimplementationwasdescribedbymanyasasometimesdifficult“learningyear.”Year2hasfocusedonadjustmentsmadetoaddressthechallengesofYear1,anddeepeningandsolidifyingimprovementsincurriculum,teachingpractices,andcultureandclimate.InmanywaysEPOleadersandadministratorsengageincontinuousimprovement,seekingtoaddresschallengesandimproveoutcomes.Year2sawaveryvisibleshiftin

Page 91: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–85–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

schoolclimatewithgenerallymoreorderlyhallwaysandincreasedstudentengagementinFamilyGroup,andapervasivesenseof“all-in”byteachers,staff,andadministrators.Inaddition,teachersandschooladministratorsarecommittedtoimprovingclassroominstruction.

Thereareanumberofwaystolookatandunderstandschoolimprovement.Intheirstudyofleadingschoolturnaround,Leithwood,Harris,andStrauss(2010)identifythreestagesofschoolturnaround:

• Stage1:Stoppingthedeclineandcreatingconditionsforearlyimprovement

• Stage2:Ensuringsurvivalandrealizingearlyperformanceimprovements

• Stage3:Achievingsatisfactoryperformanceandaspiringtomuchmore

Years1and2atEastcouldbedescribedasstage1turnaround.AsYear2comestoaclose,theschoolappearstobeenteringstage2,withalong-termplanforprofessionaldevelopmenttosolidifycurriculumimplementationandteachingpractices,newandclarifiedcoursesequences,rethinkingofalternativeprograms,andafocusonpassingtheRegentsexamsthatwillhopefullyleadtovisibleandmeasurableimprovementsinstudentoutcomes.Onecontinuingchallengeincludesimprovingstudentattendance,whichisnotoptimal,toincreasestudentoutcomesfortheschoolasawhole.Ifstudentsarenotinclass,theyarenotlearningcontent,whichwillmakepassingtheRegentsexamsthatmuchmoredifficult.Anotherissueisthatthepaceofchangeandworkforteachersremainsintense,andmoreteachersmaybegintofeelburnedout.Thesearechallengestobeaddressed.

OtherwaystolookattheprogressoftheEPOistheCenteronSchoolTurnaround’s2017frameworkofthefourdomainsofrapidimprovement(seeFigure42)andseewhereEaststands.ThefourdomainsandourassessmentofwhereEaststandsattheendofYear2areshowninTable6.

Page 92: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–86–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

Figure42.Fourdomainsofrapidimprovement

Source:TheCenteronSchoolTurnaround.(2017).Fourdomainsforrapidschoolimprovement:Asystemsframework.SanFrancisco,CA: WestEd.

Page 93: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–87–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

Table6.Eastandthefourdomainsofrapidimprovement

Domains AssessmentofEast’sprogress Recommendationstoaddresschallenges

Turnaroundleadership

• TheEPOhasprioritizedimprovementandcommunicatedurgency.

• TheEPOismonitoringprogress.

• Supportismoreschool-widethancustomized.

• Continuetostrengthendistributiveleadership.

• Planforleadershiptransitions.

• Muchresponsibilityandknowledgeabout

curriculumandinstructionresideswithCAO.

Talentdevelopment • TheEPOrecruitedallnewstaffandengagesinextensivestaffdevelopment.Somefearburn-outthatmaythreatenthesustainmentoftalentedteachers/staff.

• TheEPOprovidesextensiveprofessionallearningopportunities,manyofwhicharerequired.ProfessionallearningistargetedonEPO’sprioritiesbutmaynotbetargetedtowardindividualteacherneeds.

• TheEPOhassetclearexpectationsforteacherperformanceandhasbeenenforcingthem.

• ConsiderhowIDCPTcanbemademoreeffective,for

examplethroughclearerexpectationsortheuseof

protocols.

• Considerhowteacherleaderscanspendmore

timecoachingindividualandgroupsofteacherstomorefullyrealizepotential.

Instructionaltransformation

• TheEPOismakingprogressindiagnosingandrespondingtostudentlearningneeds.TheextentofstudentneedswassurprisingtoEPOleadersinYear1.ChallengesareespeciallyevidentinstaffingforsupportingtheneedsofEnglishlearnerstudents.

• TheEPOiscontinuingitsmulti-yearprocessofdevelopingrigorouscurriculumwithallsubjectsandgradesinvolvedincurriculumwritingorrefinementtoensureastrongalignmenttostandards.

• TheEPOisassessingliteracylevelsinstudentsandprovidingsupplementalliteracyinterventionswhenneeded.Itisunclearwhetherbarrierstolearningandopportunitiesforenhancedlearningarepresentintheschool.

• TheEPOisengaginginstrategicpartnershipstohelpmeetstudentneedsthatmayotherwisebebarrierstostudentlearning.

• Supportincreasedfidelityofcurriculumimplementation.

• StrengthentheLowerSchoolSupportmodel.

• Strengthentheacademicrigorofalternativeprograms.

• Considerwaystoincreasestudentengagementin

theclassroomandwithacademiccontent.

• Continuetosupportteachersinimplementingresearch-basedpractices,suchashigherorderthinkingskills,andthetransferofnewinformation.

Page 94: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–88–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

Domains AssessmentofEast’sprogress Recommendationstoaddresschallenges

Cultureshift • Year2hasseenmoreeffortonexplicitlybuildingaculturefocusedonlearningthroughadherencetothemissionandvision,throughtrackingprogressandgradesinFamilyGroup,andthroughotherdatatrackingefforts.Studentsappeartobetakingmoreownershipoftheirlearning,butitisnotevidentacrosstheboardintermsofeffort.

• Schoolleaderssolicitinputfromstakeholdersviavarioussurveysthroughouttheyearandthroughthe“Let’sTalk”anonymousquestionsubmissionsystemontheschool’swebsite.

• Schoolleaderscontinuetostrugglewithengagingparents.

• Addresschronicabsenteeismandtardiness.

• Supportteachersandstaffwhomaybereluctantto

embracethecarentrole.

• ConsiderwaysthatRestorativePracticescanbemodeledatalllevelsoftheschool.

ReplicationoftheEastEPOmodelTheEPOleadershipattheUniversityofRochesterisinterestedinunderstandingwhataretheessentialpiecesoftheEastmodelthatneedtobeinplaceifthismodelofschoolimprovementweretobereplicated.Whileitisstilltooearlytomeasureimpactonstudentoutcomes,certainelementsoftheEPOareemergingaskeyandshouldbeconsideredinanyreplicationofthemodel:

• Aleadershipstructurewithapositionthathasexclusiveresponsibilityforcurriculumandinstructiontoensurethatthegoaloftransformingteachingremainsthefocus.

• Theabilitytorecruitandhireteachersandstaffwhoarecommittedtothemission,vision,andhardworkofimplementingaschoolturnaround.

• Theimplementationofaresearch-basedcurriculumwithevidenceofsuccesswithsimilarpopulationsasthatservedbytheschool.

• Timeforguidedteachercollaborationtoensurethattimeiswell-spentandfocusedoninstruction.

• Timeforstudentstogetextrasupportinordertomeetthehigherexpectationsofarigorous,standards-basedcurriculum.

• Afocusontransformingtheschoolcultureandclimate,including:

- Aconsistentmessageaboutbehavioralexpectationsforstudents

- Arestorativeapproachtoaddressingconflictanddisciplineissues

- Aconsistentmessageabouthigherexpectationsforstudentsacademically,andprovidingsupportforthemtotakeownershipoftheirlearning,includinganexpectationtoattendschoolregularly

- Awayforstudentstoestablishpositiverelationshipswithadultsinthebuilding,suchasFamilyGroup

Page 95: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–89–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

• Creativewaystoengageandinformparentsaboutacademicandbehaviorexpectationsforstudents.

• Strategicengagementofcommunitypartnerstomeetthenon-academicneedsofstudentsandtheirfamiliesthatwillfacilitatestudentsgoingtoschool.Itwillalsohelptobuildtheschool’sreputation.

• Outreachtothecommunitybytheschool,toforgeconnectionsandtakeadvantageofopportunitiesthatmayfurthersupportstudentsandtheschool.

RecommendationsforOngoingEvaluationTheEastEPOmaywanttoconsiderongoingevaluation.Ongoingevaluationwouldallowtheschooltoengageinapracticeofcontinuousimprovement.Itwouldalsoprovideawayforstakeholders,fromstudentstoteachers,staff,family,andthecommunity,toprovideinputandfeedback.TheEPOmightestablishasmallevaluationcommitteewithdiversestakeholderstoinformthequestionsandmethodsfortheevaluation.Anothergoodpracticewouldbetocreateanevaluationcalendarthatlaysoutascheduleofdatacollectionandreportingactivitiestobetransparentaboutexpectations.Basedonourexperiences,wewouldalsorecommend:

• Teacher/stafffocusgroupseveryotheryear

• Yearlyteacher/staffsurvey

• Studentfocusgroupseveryotheryear

• Yearlystudentsurvey

• Yearlyexternalobservationsofclassrooms

• Trackingofleadingandlaggingindicatorsofstudentprogressandachievement,suchasattendance,passingrates,andcredits

Itwouldbewisetoconsiderparentandfamilyinput.Theevaluatorsunsuccessfullyattemptedtoconductfocusgroupswithparents,andtheEastparentsurveydidnotreceiveausableresponserate.Onewaytogetparentinputmightbetohaveparentscompleteashort,five-questionpapersurveyatsportingorotherschoolevents.

Page 96: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–90–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

AppendixA.ObservationToolsandProtocolsWestEd–EastUpperandLowerSchool–ClassroomObservationToolClassroomobservationtoolpreparedforRochester’sEastUpperandLowerSchool

Date:______________________________________

Observer’sName:______________________________________

TeacherName:______________________________________❏Checkifsubstituteteacher

GradeLevel:❏6❏7❏8❏9❏10❏11❏12❏Mixed❏Unknown

Subject:______________________________________

Period: ❏1 ❏2 ❏3❏4❏5

Placeinperiod? ❏Beginning ❏Middle ❏End

Numberofstudentsintheclassroom:________________

Numberofstudentsconsistentlyengaged:________________

KeyConcept#1:EXPLICITLEARNINGINTENTIONSLearningTargets:(Checkallthatapply)

❏Learningtargetispostedinkidfriendlylanguage.❏Learningtargetisexplainedand/orunpackedwithscholars.❏Learningtargetisreferencedand/orexplicitlyusedthroughoutthelesson.❏Learningtargetislearning-centered.❏Thesuccesscriteriaofthelearningtargetisspecificandcontextualized.❏Learningtargetisnotvisiblethroughoutthelesson.

KeyConcept#1:EXPLICITLEARNINGINTENTIONS–Notes/Comments:

Page 97: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–91–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

KeyConcept#2:LEVELOFCHALLENGEWhatwasthePLANNEDlevelofBloom’s,basedontheLearningTarget/whatwasheard:

❏Remembering❏Understanding❏Applying❏Analyzing❏Evaluating❏Creating❏Unclear/donotknow

WhatwasthehighestLIVEDlevelofBloom’s?

❏Remembering❏Understanding❏Applying❏Analyzing❏Evaluating❏Creating❏Unclear/donotknow

Thehighestlevelofobservedworkstudentsweregivenrequiresstudentstobein:

❏Acquisition❏MeaningMaking❏Transfer

ContentInstructionwasobservedthatrequiredstudentsto:(Checkallthatapply)

❏Makeconnectionsbetweendifferentideas,concepts,ortopics❏Connectthiscontenttopreviouscontent.❏Transferunderstandingtonewsituations❏Makemeaningofcontentorprocessesbymakinginferences,generalizing,categorizing,drawing

conclusions,developinghypotheses,citingevidence,analyzingperspectives❏Acquiringknowledgeorskillsthroughpracticeorexercise,organizeknowledge,deepprocess

KeyConcept#2:LEVELOFCHALLENGE–Notes/Comments:

Page 98: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–92–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

KeyConcept#3:ASSESSMENTLearningTargets:(checkallthatapply)

❏Learningtargetsareassessedwithinthelesson.❏Learningtargetsareassessedaccordingtocriteriasharedwithscholarsinthelesson.❏Learningtargetsareself-assessedbystudentswhowillstatetheirunderstandingofwhetherandto

whatextenttheymetthelearningtargetpriortotheendofthelesson.❏Notobserved

AssessmentmatchestheleveloftheLearningTarget.

❏Yes❏No,thelevelofassessmentdidnotmatchthelevelofthelearningtarget.❏Assessmentwasnotobserved.

KeyConcept#3:ASSESSMENT–Notes/Comments:

Page 99: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–93–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

KeyConcept#4:DELIBERATEPRACTICETeacherswereinvolvedinwhatappearedtobeagradualreleaseofresponsibility:modeling,guidedpractice,and/orindependentpracticebasedonthegradualreleasemodel:

❏Yes❏No

Whichphase(s)ofthegradualreleasemodeldidyouobserve:(Markyesornoforeach)

❏Modelingforwholeclass❏Teacherprovidingguidedpracticetowholeclass❏Guidedpracticewithstudentcollaboration❏Independentpractice

Studentswereobservedengagedinthefollowingactivities(Checkallthatapply)

Foreachnotehowmanystudentswereobserved:Afew,mostoralmostall:

❏Teacherdirectedquestionandanswers:❏Discoursewithotherstudentsontherelatedtopic:❏Pursuinganinquiryorresearchingaquestionwitharangeofoptionsfordirectiontopursue:❏Readingorwritingacomplextext:❏Askingorbeingaskedquestionsbeyondtheliterallevel:❏Engaginginappropriatedebate,argumentordisagreementwithpeersand/orteacher:❏Usinghigherorderthinkingandthenapplyingittoaproblem,findingasolution,orsolvingaproblem:

KeyConcept#4:DELIBERATEPRACTICE–Notes/Comments.Besuretomakenoteofanyofthefollowing:Whetherteacherusesa“hook”thatactivatespriorknowledge,whetherstudentdiscourseshowsdeepengagementwithcontent,whetherteacherobservedworkingtoensurevocabularystaysinstudentmemory,whetherteacherasksquestionsatvariouslevelsofBlooms,whetherteacherwasusingaprotocol.

Page 100: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–94–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

KeyConcept#5:FEEDBACKFeedback:(Checkallthatapply)

❏Teacherfeedbackisprovidedtoscholarsrelativetothelearningtargetbeforeclassisover,andwhilethereisstilltimetodosomethingaboutit.

❏Peerfeedbackisprovidedtoscholarsrelativetothelearningtargetbeforeclassisover,andwhilethereisstilltimetodosomethingaboutit.

❏Teacherreceivesfeedbackfromstudentsontheirprogresstowardlearningtargetbeforeclassisover,andintimetodosomethingaboutit.

Whatpercentofstudentsreceivedfeedback?

❏Alloralmostall:80-100%ofstudents❏Most:60-79%ofstudents❏Half:40-59%ofstudents❏Some:20-39%ofstudents❏Fewornone:0-19%ofstudents

KeyConcept#5:FEEDBACK–Notes/Comments

KeyConcept#6:REFLECTION,COLLABORATIONWerescholarsprovidedopportunityforreflectionrelatedtothestatedLearningTargetorassessmentcriteria?

❏Yes,withtheteacher.❏Yes,withpeers.❏Yes,independently.❏Notobserved.

KeyConcept#6:REFLECTION,COLLABORATION–Notes/Comments

Page 101: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–95–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

ContextNotes&GeneralObservations:

Page 102: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–96–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

EastUpperandLowerSchoolCPT ObservationFormObserver'sName:

Date: Period:

ContentAreaorDepartment:

GradeLevel(s):

ObservationStartTime:

WhoispresentfortheCPT?Specifyifanyadminspresent.

Doestheteamuseanagenda?(Obtainacopyifpossible)

Yes No

Checkallrolesthatareobservedinuseduringtheteammeeting:Checkallthatapply.

Facilitator Notetaker Timekeeper Other

Doestheteamtakemeetingnotesorminutes?

Yes No Unsure

Werestudent(orother)datausedduringthemeeting?Ifyes,pleasedescribe

Pleasecheckallactivitiesobservedduringthemeeting.Checkallthatapply.

Planningforinstruction(e.g.,lessonplanning,WHATtoteach) Examiningeducationaldata(e.g.,assessmentresults,studentwork) DiscussingissuesorquestionsrelatedtospecificstudentsDiscussinginstructionalstrategies(e.g.,ideasforHOWtoteach)

Housekeeping

UsethespacebelowtodocumentwhatwasobservedduringtheCPTmeeting.Ifpossible,notewhoisspeaking,examplesofdiscussion,andmaterialsused.

ObserverMeetingNotes(Continueonreverseifneeded)

Page 103: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–97–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

ObservationEndTime:

Page 104: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–98–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

FamilyGroupObservationprotocol

Date: Block/Period: Obs.StartTime: Obs.EndTime:

StudentInfo #ofstudents: ☐LowerSchool ☐MixedGrades

ENLstudentspresent?:Y/N

☐UpperSchool ☐SingleGrade(specify):

CarentInfo #present:☐1☐2☐Other(specify): Bilingual?☐Y☐N☐N/A

☐Teacher(specifysubject/grade):

☐Admin☐Other(specify):

AdditionalCarentInfo:

FamilyGroupAgenda/TopicofDiscussion

EvidenceofFamilyGroupMissioninAction

☐Generalsenseofbelongingperceived

☐Positiverelationshipsmodeled/evident

☐Studentempowermentencouraged

☐Studentvoiceheard/cultivated

Elementsof“Official”DailyProtocolObserved

☐Greeting

☐Opening/Check-In

☐ThemeRound

☐ConnectionsRound

☐SupplementalActivities(specify)

☐Closing

☐FamilyGroupBreakaway

FamilyGroupBestPracticesObserved

☐Scholarattendancetaken

☐Activitiesbeganwithacircle

☐Activitiesendedwithacircle

☐Lessonplanused

☐LeaderInMematerialsused

☐Evidenceofrituals,norms,and/orroutinesinuse

☐PeaceCircleobserved(note:Recommended2–3timesperweek,notdaily)

Page 105: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–99–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

PeaceCircleComponents

☐CircleCenter☐Other:

☐TalkingPiece

GeneralNotes

Page 106: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–100–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

AppendixB.InterviewProtocolsSchoolandEPOLeaders1.Thinkingaboutthepastyear,whatprogresshasbeenmadetowardachievingthegoalsoftheEPO[LISTTHEM]?graduation,passingregents,attendance,cultureandclimateandtransformingteachingandlearning

2.WhichgoaldoyoubelievetheEPOhasmadethemostsignificantprogresstoward?Graduationrate,passingregents,attendance,cultureandclimateandtransformingteachingandlearning.

3.[Ifnotdiscussedabove]Whathashadthemostimpacton:

• Studentsuccess—attendance,grades,credits• Climateandculture–studentdisciplinecode?• Teachingpractices

andwhy?

4.WhathavebeenthemostsignificantchallengeswiththeEPOthispastyear?

12.InvolvementofUR&workingwithRCSD

• InwhatwayshastheUniversitybeeninvolvedthisyear?Whatdoestheuniversitybringthatwouldn’tbeavailableotherwise?

• Whatarethechallengesofuniversityinvolvement?• InwhatwayshasRCSDbeeninvolvedintheEPOimplementation?

5.Whathavebeensomelessonslearnedaboutwhattodoandwhatnottoinauniversity-ledschoolturnaround?

IwanttoaskaboutsomespecificinitiativesandareasofworktheEPOfocusedon.

6.Leadershipcapacitydevelopment.ThereweresomesignificantleadershipchangesbetweenYear1and2,andthesuperintendentsharedhisgoaltodevelop(a)thecapacityofleadersand(b)empowerteacherstobeleadersthroughadistributedleadershipmodel.

• Tellmeabouttheeffortsandprogressthisyearinleadershipdevelopment.ORTellmeinwhatwayshastheschool-widecapacityforleadershipbeenstrengthenedorimproved?

• Whatevidencedoyouhavethatadistributedleadershipmodelisimplemented/takingrootatEast?Whatarethestrengthsandweaknessesofthedistributiveleadershipmodel?

7.Communication.AttheendofYear1,teachersandsomeleadersreportedsignificantcommunicationchallenges.EffortswerebeingmadeatthebeginningofYear2toaddressthoseconcerns.Whatwerethestrategiesused?Whatimprovementshavebeenmade?Whatchallengesstillexist?

Page 107: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–101–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

8.TransformingTeaching.TransformingteachingtopositivelyimpactstudentlearninghasbeenamajorfocusofeffortsoftheEPO.InyourperspectivehasteachingbeentransformedatEast?Ifso,whathashadthemostinfluenceonthat?Whatevidenceisthere?

I’dliketoaskaboutsomespecificinitiatives:

• Teacherleaders-WhatistheimportanceofteacherleadersinachievingEPOgoals?Whatimpactshavetheyhadandhowdoyouknow?

• CPT-WhatisgoingwellwithCPTthisyear?Whatneedstobechanged?WhatistheimportanceofCPTinachievingEPOgoals?Whatimpacthavetheyhaveandhowdoyouknow?

• Curriculumwork-Whatistheimportanceofthecurriculumworkintransformingteaching?What’sgoingwellwithitandwhathavebeenthechallenges?

• LearningTargets-Whatistheimportanceoftheuseoflearningtargetsintransformingteaching?Whatimpacthavetheyhadandhowdoyouknow?AnychallengeswithLTthisyear?

• Anyothercurricularorteachinginitiativesorissuesyou’dliketodiscuss?Eitherthingsthathavegonewellorbeenchallenges?

Relatedisprofessionallearning.

• ProfessionallearningisalsoseenaskeytotransformingteachingatEast.Whathasgonewellwithprofessionallearningthisyear?Whathavebeenchallenges?

• Towhatextenthaveyoubeenabletoimplementtheprofessionallearningplan?• TowhatextentistheprofessionallearningatEastalignedtothegoals?

9.SupportsforStudents.TheEPOplanincludedsignificantsupportsforstudentsacademicallyandsocially/emotionally.

*Supportperiod.Significantchangesweremadetosupportperiodthisyear.

• Howhassupportgonethisyear(attheUpperandLowerSchool)?• Towhatextentissupportperiodhavingtheintendentimpactonstudents(passingclasses)?• Whatevidencedoyouhavethatsupportiseffective/impactful?• Issupportsomethingimportanttocontinue?• *Specialeducationstudents/ELLs–wehaveheardsomestaffexpressconcernthatthese

studentsarenotgettingthesupportstheyneed…beingleftbehind/forgotten.Whatstepsarebeingtaken/havebeentakentoaddresstheneedsofSPED/ELLs?

Freshmanacademy.Freshmanacademyunderwentchangesinleadershipthisyear.

• HowwasFreshmanAcademydifferentthisyear?• WhathasbeentheimpactofFreshmanAcademy?Howdoyouknow/whatevidencedoyou

have?• Whataretheplans/goalsforFreshmanAcademygoingforward?

*FamilyGroup.FamilyGroupalsounderwentsignificantchangesthisyear,withamodelofatleast2carentsandachangesinthecurriculum/supportprovidedtocarents.

Page 108: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–102–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

• WhathasgonewellwithFamilyGroupbeenthisyear?Whathavebeenthechallenges?• Whatimpacts,ifany,haveyouseenfromFamilyGroup?• Whataretheplans/changesforFamilyGroupplanned?

Additionof6thgrade

• Recruitmenttothe6thgradewasachallengethispastyear.Progressonrelationshipwithschool33?Whataretheplansfor6thgradenextyear?Forthefuture?

• Whatistheimportanceof6thgradetothemodel?

10.Studentoutcomes.Wewilllookatsomeofthesedataquantitatively,butwe’dliketoknowyourimpressionof

• Changesinstudenttardinessandskipping(attendance)• Changesinstudentspassingcourses?• Changesinstudents’stateassessments(RegentsorNYS)

11.Cultureandclimate.

• **RestorativepracticeswereakeypartofchangingthecultureandclimateatEastandweheardlastyearthatimplementationwasalittlerocky.TellusabouthowthingshavegonewithRestorativePracticesthisyear?

o Strengths/impacts?Examples/evidence?o Challenges/Changesgoingforward?Examples/evidence?

• Howhasstudentvoicebeenincorporatedthisyear?• *Towhatextentare[teachers/staff/leaders]“Allin”thisyear?AnychangesfromYear1?Ifso,

what?

o Ifnot,whatisneededtoimprovebuy-in?

13.Workingwithfamiliesandcommunity.

• Whatstepshavebeentakentoincreasefamilyengagementthisyear?Towhatextenthavetheybeensuccessful?Whathavebeenthechallengesforengagingfamilies?

• Whatarethegoalsorplansforfamilyengagementinthenearfuture?• Whatprogresshasbeenmadetowardbeingacommunityschool?WhatisthevisionforEastas

aCommunitySchool?• Whatchangeshavetherebeen,ifany,intheconnections/relationshipbetweenEastandits

neighborhood?

14.Workingwithpartners.

• Whichpartnershipshavebeenparticularlyimportanttotheprogress/successoftheEPO?Tostudentsuccessspecifically?

• Arethereanyneedsthatyouwouldliketohavemetbypartners?• Arethereanypartnershipsthatarenotworkingout?

Page 109: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–103–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

15.Missionandvision.

• HowhasthemissionandvisionsupportedtheEPO?Howisintegratedintotheschool?• Towhatextentdoesitpermeatetheschool?

16.Anythingelseweshouldknowordiscuss?

Page 110: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–104–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

TeacherFocusGroupprotocol1. HowhavethingsgoneforyouasateacheratEastthisschoolyear?Howisthatascomparedto

lastyear?

2. WeknowtherearealotofinitiativesfromcurriculumdevelopmenttoCPTtoprofessionaldevelopmentonlearningtargetsandmore.WhatEPOsupportsandinitiativesforteachershavebeenmostbeneficialforyou…andWHY?

Specificallyaskabout:CPT;coaching/teacherleaders;commonformativeassessments;professionallearning;collaborativecurriculumwork

Whatexamples/evidencecanyoushare?

3. Whatchangeshaveyoumadeinyourowninstructionalpractices?Thinkingaboutyourteachingherewhathasbeensuccessful?Whathasbeenchallenging?

4. Howareyou“usingdata”tosupportyourteachingand/orhelptoimprovestudentlearning?

5. Whatopportunitiesdoyou/teachershaveforleadershipatEast?Informalandformal?

6. WhatEPOsupportsforstudentsdoyoubelievetobemosteffective/beneficial…andWHY?

Specificallyaskabout:longerday;supportroom;curriculumrigor/culturalrelevance;familygroup;restorativepractices;freshmanacademy;andmore

Whatexamples/evidencecanyoushare?

7. TowhatextentandinwhatwaysdoyoubelievethegoalsoftheEPOhavebeenachieved?

8. Whatchallenges/barrierstoachievingthegoalsarestillunresolved?

9. WhatdoyouseeasthemostimportantnextstepfortheEPOimplementationgoingforward?

10. Whatareyoumosthopefulabout?

11. WhatwouldyouliketoaddthatIdidn’taskyou?

Page 111: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–105–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

TeacherLeaderFocusGroupProtocolOpening

1. Let’sstartbygoingaroundtheroom,statingyournameandyourrolesattheschool.

Curriculum,InstructionandAssessment

2. Whataretheexpectationsforyourworkasacoach/teacherleaderthisyear?

a. Howaredecisionsmadeaboutyourwork?Areyourrolesandyourresponsibilitiescleartoothersandrespectedbythem?Howaredecisionsmadeaboutyourwork?

b. Probefor:havingadditionalcoachingtime;facilitationofsubjectspecificCPTs;havingaTLCPTledbytheCAO.

3. Whatdoyoudoinyourroleascoach/teacherleader?What’satypicaldaylike?

a. Howoftendoyouworkwithteachers?Howdoyoudoit(inclasscoaching,CPT,usingdata,modeling,etc.)?

b. Doyouhaveenoughtimetoprovideallteachersonyourrosterwithwhattheyneed?

4. Howdoyouusedatainyourworkwithteachers?

5. HowdoyouuseCollaborativePlanningTimetosupportteachers?Isitanimpactful?

6. HowdoestheCoachesCPTsupportyourwork?Isitimpactful?

7. Howhastheteacherleader/coachingworkmadeadifferenceintheschoolandhowdoyouknow?(Probeforspecificity/examples)

8. Howwouldyoudescribetheprogressoftheadoptionofkeyinstructionalandcurricularpractices(UBD,learningtargets,curriculum)?ProbefordifferencesintheUpperorLowerSchoolsorindifferentsubjectmatters?

9. Whatchallengesfromlastyearhavebeenresolved?Whatchallengesareongoing?(Probeforspecificityifneeded)(Ifreportresistanceorthatteachersaren’tdoingthepractices,probeforWHY?)

a. Whatmightneedtobedonetoresolveoraddressthesechallenges?

10. Whatwouldyousayarethestrengthsoftheclassroomteachingthisyear?Howdoyouknow?Askforexamples.

11. Whataresomeweaknessesinteachingthatstillneedtobeaddressed?

12. TowhatextentisthecurriculumculturallyrelevanttothepopulationyouteachatEAST?Askforexamplesiftheyhaveanyofhowitisorisnotrelevant.

Page 112: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–106–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

13. Whatothersupportsdoyouneedasacoach/TL?

a. WhatPDtopicsdoyoubelievestaffwouldmostbenefitfromrightnow(duringthesummer)asEastpreparesfornextyear?

14. Whatopportunitiesarethereforteacherleadershipthisyear?Differentfromlastyear?HowdoesteacherleadershiphelptoachievetheEPO’sgoalsornot?

Wrapupquestions

1. Havetherebeencommunicationchallengesthisyear?HavetheseimprovedsinceSeptember?

2. Whatopportunitiesdoyouhaveforsharingconcernsandideas?

3. Whatsurprisedyouthemostthisyear?

4. Ofwhatareyoumostproudinyourworkthisyear?

5. Howwouldyoulikenextyeartobedifferent?

Page 113: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–107–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

VicePrincipalLevelFocusGroupProtocol1. HowhavethingsbeengoingatEastfromyourperspectivethisyear?

a. WhathavebeensomestrengthsatEastthisyear?b. Whathavebeensomechallenges?

2. What’sdifferent,ifanythingaboutyourworkthisyear?

a. Workingwithteachers?CPT?Walkthroughs?b. Usingdata?

3. Whatkindsofsupportdoyouallreceive?Whathasbeenmosthelpful?Whatarethegaps?

4. Thinkingabouttheinstructionalinitiatives(learningtargets,UBDunits,CFAs),towhatextentwouldyousaytheyhavebeenimplemented?Whathasgonewell?Whathavebeenchallenges?

a. Howwouldyoudescribeinstructionalpractices?

5. Whatsupportsforteachershavebeenthemostimpactful?Why?How?

6. Thinkingaboutsupportsforstudents,towhatextentaretheirneedsbeingeffectivelymet?

a. whathasbeenmostbeneficialforstudents?b. Whatongoingchallengesrelatedtostudentsupportstillexist?

7. Arethereanyparticulargroupsofstudentsthatareunderservedinthebuildingorwhoseneedsmightnotbemetaswellastheycouldbe(examplesmightbebilingual/ENLs,severelyoverage/"not-college-bound"kids,kidsinSPED)?

8. Howwouldyoudescribestudentacademicperformancethisyear?Whathavebeensuccesses?Wherehaveyouseenthemostprogress?Whathavebeenchallenges?

a. Towhatdoyouattributetheprogress?

9. Haveyouseenother,non-academicoutcomesforstudentsthisyear?What?Towhatdoyouattributethese?

10. Howwouldyoudescribetheschoolculturethisyear?

a. Amongstudents?b. Amongadults?

11. Howisrestorativepracticesgoingthisyear?Anychanges?

12. Tellmeaboutstrategies/activitieswillrelatedto:

• Partners?• EngagingFamilies?• Solidifyingcommunityconnection?

Page 114: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–108–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

13. Inwhatwayshasschool-wide“capacityforleadership”beenstrengthenedorimproved?

14. Communityschools/parentengagement

15. Asyoureflecton2years,whataresomelessonslearnedaboutthiswork?–Whatnottodo;whattoavoid?

16. WhatprogresshasbeenmadetowardsachievingthegoalsoftheEPO?Whatdoyoubelievetobemostsignificant?WhatbarriersistheEPOfacingtoachievingthesegoals?Whereismoreordifferenteffortsneeded?

17. WhatarethemostimportantnextstepsfortheEPO?

18. Anythingwehaven’ttalkedaboutthatweshould?

Page 115: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–109–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

Counselors/SocialWorkersProtocol1. Let’sgoaroundtheroomtointroduceourselvesandourroles.

2. Howwouldyousaythingshavegoneforcounselors/socialworkersduringthisschoolthisyear?Howarethingsdifferentthanlastyear?

3. Howhavethingsgonewitheffortstoaddress:

• Attendance/tardiness(tracking;data;alternativeprograms;follow-up)• Graduationrate(Support;tracking;data;alternativeprograms)• Schoolclimate(allin/allthetime;SSOs;RestorativePractices,disciplinecommunicated)• Studentbehavior(RestorativePractices,FamilyGroup;SSOs;disciplinecommunicated)• Studentacademicprogress(Support;curriculumrigor;fewerstudents;longerday;improved

classroombehavior;improvedELLsupports)• Studentengagement/enthusiasm?(improvedclimate;extrasupport;expandedCPT)• Socio/emotionalhealthofthestudentpopulationatEast?Supportsforstudents/referral

process• Familyparticipation/collaborationwithEast(communication;FACE;outreach)

4. DoyouhavetheresourcesandsupportstoadequatelymeettheneedsofstudentsatEast?

a. Whyorwhynot?

5. Whatchange(s)implementedasaresultoftheEPOdoyoubelievehavehadthemostpositiveimpactonstudents?

6. TowhatextentandinwhatwaysdoyoubelievethegoalsoftheEPOhavebeenachieved?Whatsuccesseshaveyouseen?

7. Arethereanyneworstillunresolvedchallenges/barrierstoachievingtheEPOgoals?

8. WhatdoyouseeasthemostimportantnextstepfortheEPOimplementationgoingforward?

9. WhatwouldyouliketoaddthatIdidn’taskyou?

Page 116: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–110–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

SchoolSecurityOfficers1. I’dlikeeachofyoutointroduceyourselfandsayhowlongyou’vebeenworkingatEast.We

won’trecordyournames.

2. Canyoudescribeyourroleandresponsibilitiesattheschool?

a. Whooverseesordirectsyourwork?b. Whattrainingdidyoureceive,ifany,todothiswork?c. Whatinformationortrainingdidyoureceiveaboutbehaviorexpectations,whatto

enforceandhow?d. Doyouhavearoleintherestorativepracticesatschool?Ifyes,how?e. Doyouhaveadequateresourcestoeffectivelydoyourjob?Ifnot,whatdoyouneed?

3. ForthoseofyouwhoarenotnewtoEast,canyoutalkalittleaboutifanythinghaschangedin:

a. yourroleandresponsibilitiesovertime?b. Studentbehavior?c. Schoolcultureandclimate

4. What'sgoingwellinyourworkattheschoolthisyear?

5. Whataresomeofthechallengestodoingyourwork?

6. Isthereanythingyouthinkweshouldknowthatwehaven’talreadytalkedabout?

Paraprofessionals1. Whatisyourrole?/Whatdoyoudo?

2. Whodirectsyourwork?

3. Howareyouinvolvedinthedifferentinitiativesattheschool(learningtargets,etc.)?

4. HowPDopportunitiesdoyouhave?

5. Whoorwhatprovidessupporttoyouinyourwork?

6. Toextentarestudents’needsbeingwellmet?

7. HowwouldyoudescribethecultureandclimateatEast?

8. Howareyouinvolvedinrestorativepractices?

9. Isthereanythingelsethatwehaven’ttalkedaboutthatyou’dliketoshare?

Page 117: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–111–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

StudentFocusGroupProtocolUpperSchoolThankyouforparticipatingintoday’sfocusgroup.Mynameis——,IworkforWestEd,anot-for-profiteducationresearchandserviceagency.WestEdisconductingtheevaluationofEastHighSchoolunderthe“EducationalPartnershipOrganization”(EPO)agreement.YourfeedbackwillbeusedtounderstandhowthingsaregoingattheschoolsincetheEPOandtoinformimprovementsattheschool.Itisimportantforyoutoknowthatwewillbetakingnotestoday.Nooneexcepttheevaluationteamwillhaveaccesstoournotesandyouwillnotbeidentifiedbynameinournotes.Theinformationfromallofourfocusgroupswillbesynthesized.Whenwereportyourfeedback,youwillbeanonymous.

Confidentiality.Beforewebegin,thereareafewthingsIwouldliketodiscusswithyou.Pleaseknowthatallofyourcommentswillbekeptconfidentialandreportedintheaggregate(i.e.theywillnot“getintrouble”forsharingtheiropinionswithus).Thismeanswewillneveruseyourname.

Process.Second,therearenorightorwronganswers;wewanttoknowyouropinionsandexperienceshereatEast,sopleasesharewithustothebestofyourability.Thisisaninformalsession.Myroleistoaskquestions,listen,takenotesandkeepyouontrack.Wewanttobesureeveryonehasachancetoshareandwedon’texpecteveryonetoagree.Wewelcomeallideas,opinionsandpointsofview.

Weaskthatyoulistenrespectfullytoyourpeers,andweareaskingyoutorespectyourpeersbynotrepeatingorsharinganythingyouhearinthisfocusgroupoutsideofthisroom.

Any questions before we begin?

AllStudents:

1. Haveyouspentyourentire(middleorhigh)schoolexperienceatEastHighSchool?(Note:Askingforashowofhandscanbeusefulhere)

2. WhatdoyoulikeaboutEastHighschool?Whatisthebiggestchallenge/problematEast?

3. HowwouldyoudescribethewayEastHighwaswhenyoufirststartedhere?

a. Academics(Potentialprompts:Didyoufindclassestooeasy,toochallengingorjustright?Whatdidyouthinkofthevarietyandqualityofcourseofferings?Thelearningenvironment?)

b. Disciplinec. Socialenvironmentd. Supportforstudentswhowerestrugglingorhavingahardtime[withschooland/orlife

ingeneral]e. Communicationandinteractionbetweenschoolandfamilies/communityf. Staffattitudesandbehaviortowardstudents

Page 118: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–112–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

4. HaveyouseenanychangeshereatEastHighoverthepastyear?

a. Academics(Seepotentialpromptsabove)b. Disciplinec. Socialenvironmentd. Supportforstudentswhowerestrugglingorhavingahardtime[withschooland/orlife

ingeneral]e. Communicationandinteractionbetweenschoolandfamilies/communityf. Staffattitudesandbehaviortowardstudents(Note:studentsinterpretedtheoriginal

queryasaquestionaboutstaffturnover)

5. Whendidyoufirstnoticethechangesyou’veseensofar?

6. DoyouthinkthechangeshavebeengoodforEast?

a. Ifso,howso?b. Ifnot,whynot?

7. Doyouhaveopportunitiestoshareyourthoughtsonchangesattheschoolwithstaff?

a. Withwhomdoyoushareyourthoughts?b. Howoften?

8. Doyouknowofany(additional,upcoming)changesplannedforEastUpperSchoolorLowerSchool?

a. Howdidyoufindoutaboutthem?

9. WehaveheardofafewnewprogramsaddedtoEastUpperSchoolthisyear.TwoofthoseincludeFamilyGroupandSupportPeriods.Doanyofyouparticipateinthoseprograms?

a. Canyoutellmeaboutthem?Howdotheywork?b. Doyoufindthemhelpful?(Howso?Whynot?)

10. WheredoyouseeyourselfafterEast?AretheEastprogramandstaffhelpingyoutofigureoutyourpost-Eastplans?

SpecialProgramQuestions

For6thgraders:(someofthesequestionscouldbemovedintothegeneralsection)

1. WhatmadeyouchooseEastfor6thgrade?WhatmakesEastdifferentfromtheotherschoolsyoucouldhaveenrolledin?

2. Whatdoyouthinkofyourexperiencesofar?a. Hasyourexperiencebeenwhatyouthoughtitwouldbe?

3. DoyouthinkyouwillstayatEastuntilyougraduatefromhighschool?4. DoyouthinkyouwillgetthehelpyouneedatEasttograduateontime?

Page 119: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–113–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

For9thGraders

1. AreyouparticipatingintheFreshmanAcademy?2. WhatmakesFreshmanAcademyspecial?3. WhatdoyoulikemostaboutFreshmanAcademy?4. DoyouthinkFreshmanAcademywillhelpyoubesuccessfulasanupperclassman?Howso?5. IfyoucouldchangeanythingaboutFreshmanAcademytomakeitbetter,whatwouldthatbe?

ForUpperSchoolscholarsinalternativeprogramming

1. Whatmakesyourprogram(Quest,FreedomSchool,BigPicture,EastEvening)special?2. Whatdoyoulikemostaboutyourprogram?3. Isyourprogramtailoredtoyou?(Orisitonesizefitsall?)HowdoesEastfigureoutwhatyour

needsare?4. Doyouthinkyourprogramwillhelpyoubesuccessfulasanupperclassman?Howso?5. Doyouthinkyourprogramismakingadifferenceforyourfuture?Howso?

EndingQuestions:

1. DoyoufeelthatEastishelpingyoutodevelopintoasuccessfulyoungadult?Howso?2. IfyoucouldchangeanythingaboutEastHighschool,whatwouldthosechangesbe?

Page 120: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–114–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

ParentFocusGroupInterviewprotocolIntro:Introduceself.Thankparentsfortheirtime.Explainnatureofproject(usinglanguageschoolhasalreadyusedtodescribeevaluation).Informparentsthatcommentswillbekeptconfidentialandreportedintheaggregate.

1. HowlonghasyourscholarbeenatEast?Whatgrade(s)isyourscholar(s)in?

2. WhatareyourimpressionsofEastoverall?

a. Academics(rigor,variety/qualityofcourseofferings,learningenvironment)b. Disciplinec. Socialenvironmentd. Supporte. Communicationbetweenschoolandfamilies/communityf. Personnel(quality)

3. Areyousatisfiedwiththequalityof…(eachoftheabove)atEast?

4. Howwelldoyouthinktheschoolservesstudents/meetsstudents’needs?

a. Describewhyandhow

5. Doyouhaveopportunitiestosharefeedbackwiththeschool?

a. Withwhomdoyoushareyourthoughts?b. Howoften?c. Doyoufeelyourthoughtsaretakenseriously/respected?

6. Howdoestheschoolcommunicatewithyou?Whichofthesemethodsdoyoufindthemostuseful?

a. Doyoufeelyoureceiveadequateinformationaboutyourscholar?b. Doyoufeelyoureceiveadequateinformationaboutwhatisgoingonattheschool?

7. HowoftendoyouvisitEast?

a. Ingeneral,whatisthepurposeofyourvisits?(Ex.Meetingwithstaffaboutyourscholar,volunteering,attendingsportingevents,accessingmedicalcenter…)

8. DoyoufeelEastpromotespositiverelationships/connectionswithitsstudents’families?

9. DoyoufeelwelcometovolunteeratEastorparticipateinschoolevents?Haveyoubeeninvitedtodoso?

10. IfyouweretohavetheidealrelationshipwithEastasaparent/guardian,whatwouldthatlooklike?Whatwouldstaythesame?Whatwouldhavetochange?

11. WhenyoutalkaboutEasttoothers,whatdoyoumentionmost?

Page 121: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–115–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

PartnerfocusGroupprotocol1. Inwhatwaysareyoucurrentlyworkingwithstudentsortheirfamilies?

2. Whathavebeenyourorganization’s/agency’sgreatestaccomplishmentsinworkingwithEast’sstudents,families,counselorsorteachers?

a. Evidenceofsuccesses?

3. HowhastheworkofyourorganizationcontributedtotheattainmentoftheEPO’sgoalsormissionforEastHighSchool?(Mayneedtoenumeratethemhere.)

4. WhatchallengesdoesyourorganizationcontinuetofaceinyourworkatEastorwithEast?

a. Examples?

5. Isthereanythingyourorganizationneedstomakeyourworkmoresuccessful?

6. WhatdoyouseeasthemostimportantnextstepfortheEPOimplementationgoingforward?

7. Isthereanythingyou’dliketheEPOleadershiptoknowabouttheworkyouaredoing?

8. Isthereanythingyou’dliketoaddthatIdidn’taskyou?

Iftimeallows:Howhasbeingapartnerinaschoolturnaroundprocessimpactedyourorganization?

Page 122: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–116–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

AppendixC.AssessmentofEastEPOonDTSDEStandardsofPracticeTenetsandStandardsofPractice AssessmentofEastEPO

Tenet2-SchoolLeaderPracticesandDecisions:Visionaryleaderscreateaschoolcommunityandculturethatleadtosuccess,well-beingandhighacademicoutcomesforallstudentsviasystemsofcontinuousandsustainableschoolimprovement.

StatementofPractice2.2:TheschoolleaderensuresthattheschoolcommunitysharestheSpecific,Measurable,Ambitious,Results-oriented,andTimely(SMART)goals/missionandlong-termvisioninclusiveofcorevaluesthataddresstheprioritiesoutlinedintheSchoolComprehensiveEducationalPlan(SCEP).

ThesummerbetweenYear1and2sawthedevelopmentofaclearmissionandvisionthathascometopermeatetheschoolintermsoflanguageusedbyscholarsandteachers,staff,andadministrators,andalsodisplayedthroughouttheschool.

StatementofPractice2.3:Leadersmakestrategicdecisionstoorganizeprogrammatic,human,andfiscalcapitalresources

Theevaluatorsdidnotexaminefiscaldecisions.Schoolleaderscollaboratewitheachother,andwithotherinformalleaderswhostepuptomakeprogrammaticdecisions,suchaschangestoSupportandFamilyGroup

Tenet3-CurriculumDevelopmentandSupport:TheschoolhasrigorousandcoherentcurriculaandassessmentsthatareappropriatelyalignedtotheCommonCoreLearningStandards(CCLS)forallstudentsandaremodifiedforidentifiedsubgroupsinordertomaximizeteacherinstructionalpracticesandstudent-learningoutcomes.

StatementofPractice3.2:TheschoolleaderensuresandsupportsthequalityimplementationofasystematicplanofrigorousandcoherentcurriculaappropriatelyalignedtotheCommonCoreLearningStandards(CCLS)thatismonitoredandadaptedtomeettheneedsofstudents.

Theschoolleaderusesadistributedleadershipmodelwithmixedsuccess,asnotallteachersfeeltheycanstepup.Thereisanunderstandingofspecialstudentneeds,buttheseneedsarenotalwayswellmetbecauseofexternalchallengessuchashiring.TheEPOhasasystematicplantodeveloprigorous,standards-basedcurriculum.

StatementofPractice3.3:Teachersdevelopandensurethatunitandlessonplansusedincludedata-driveninstruction(DDI)protocolsthatareappropriatelyalignedtotheCCLSandNYScontentstandardsandaddressstudentachievementneeds.

Aspartoftheongoingcurriculumdesignwork,teachersareintheprocessofputtingtheirunitsandlessonsintoaUBDformat,whichwillensuretheunitsarestandardsbasedanddifferentiatedtomeetstudentneeds.

StatementofPractice3.4:Theschoolleaderandteachershavedevelopedacomprehensiveplanforteacherstopartnerwithinandacrossallgradesandsubjectstocreateinterdisciplinarycurriculatargetingthearts,technology,andotherenrichmentopportunities Thisisnotsomethingtheschoolhasundertaken.

Page 123: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–117–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

TenetsandStandardsofPractice AssessmentofEastEPO

StatementofPractice3.5:Teachersimplementacomprehensivesystemforusingformativeandsummativeassessmentsforstrategicshortandlong-rangecurriculumplanningthatinvolvesstudentreflection,trackingof,andownershipoflearning.

Teachersinallcontentareasandgradeshavedevelopedan8-weekCommonFormativeAssessmentsystemthatessentiallyactsapre-andpost-test.ThesystemwasimplementedforthefirsttimeinYear2withmixedsuccess.

Tenet4-TeacherPracticesandDecisions:Teachersengageinstrategicpracticesanddecision-makinginordertoaddressthegapbetweenwhatstudentsknowandneedtolearn,sothatallstudentsandpertinentsubgroupsexperienceconsistenthighlevelsofengagement,thinkingandachievement.

StatementofPractice4.2:Schoolandteacherleadersensurethatinstructionalpracticesandstrategiesareorganizedaroundannual,unit,anddailylessonplansthataddressallstudentgoalsandneeds.

Everycourseisworkingonacomprehensivecourseplantoensureitisstandards-basedusingtheUnderstandingbyDesignframework.Theschoolhasalsoundertakenextensiveprofessionaldevelopmenttoensureteacherpracticesareorganizedaroundtheunitsandareresearch-based.Systematicobservationsbyevaluatorsindicatethatprogressisbeingmadeintermsofteacherpracticesmeetingexpectationsbutthatareasofneededimprovementnotedincludestudentengagement,higherorderquestioning,andmorestudentdirectedwork.

StatementofPractice4.3:Teachersprovidecoherent,andappropriatelyalignedCommonCoreLearningStandards(CCLS)-basedinstructionthatleadstomultiplepointsofaccessforallstudents.

Everycourseisworkingonacomprehensivecourseplantoensureitisstandards-basedusingtheUnderstandingbyDesignframework.Teachersaresupportedbyteacherleaders(coaches),specialeducationteachers,andparaprofessionalstoensureallstudentscanaccesstheinstruction.EvaluatorsobservedpocketsofoutstandingENLinstructionandspecialeducationco-teaching.AchallengetheschoolfacesisnotbeingabletohiresufficientENLstaff.Anotherchallengeissomeongoingstaffresistancetofullinclusionandco-teaching.SometeachersexpressedconcernaboutwhetherENLstudentsarehavingtheirneedsmettoaccessinstructionandthecurriculum.

StatementofPractice4.4:Teachersandstudentsworktogethertoimplementaprogram/plantocreatealearningenvironmentthatisresponsivetostudents’variedexperiencesandtailoredtothestrengthsandneedsofallstudents.

Unabletoassessoverall.SomeevidenceofthisinthesupportroomsandintheQuestprogramandFreedomSchool.

StatementofPractice4.5:Teachersinformplanningandfosterstudentparticipationintheirownlearningprocessbyusingavarietyofsummativeandformativedatasources(e.g.,screening,interimmeasures,andprogressmonitoring).

Unabletoassessoverall.TheschoolbegantheuseofCommonFormativeAssessmentthisyear.

Tenet5-StudentSocialandEmotionalDevelopmentalHealth:Theschoolcommunityidentifies,promotes,andsupportssocialandemotionaldevelopmentbydesigningsystemsandexperiencesthatleadtohealthyrelationshipsandasafe,respectfulenvironmentthatisconducivetolearningforallconstituents.

Page 124: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–118–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

TenetsandStandardsofPractice AssessmentofEastEPO

StatementofPractice5.2:Theschoolleaderestablishesoverarchingsystemsandunderstandingsofhowtosupportandsustainstudentsocialandemotionaldevelopmentalhealthandacademicsuccess.

TheEPOincludesplansforextensivesocialandemotionalsupportforstudentsatEast.Muchprogresshasbeenmade.Schoolleadersfoundgreaterlevelsofsocialemotionalneedsandtraumaamongstudentsthanexpected.ThelevelofneedishighatEast.OverarchingsystemsimplementedincludeFamilyGrouptobuildadult-studentconnectionsandRestorativePractices.Additionalsupportsincludeincreasedsocialworkersandbookstudies(e.g.TraumaInformedTeaching).TheLowerSchoolalsousedtheLeaderinMecurriculum,thoughlesssoinYear2comparedtoYear1)

StatementofPractice5.3:Theschoolarticulatesandsystematicallypromotesavisionforsocialandemotionaldevelopmentalhealththatisalignedtoacurriculumorprogramthatprovideslearningexperiencesandasafeandhealthyschoolenvironmentforfamilies,teachers,andstudents.

TheschoolpromotesavisionforsocialandemotionaldevelopmentthatisrootedinconnectionsbetweenstudentsandteachersthroughFamilyGroup,theuseofRestorativePracticesschool-wide,andtheLeaderinMefortheLowerSchool.AsidefromtheLeaderinMeprogram,noparticularcurriculumorprogramisused.

StatementofPractice5.4:Allschoolstakeholdersworktogethertodevelopacommonunderstandingoftheimportanceoftheircontributionsincreatingaschoolcommunitythatissafe,conducivetolearning,andfosteringofasenseofownershipforprovidingsocialandemotionaldevelopmentalhealthsupportstiedtotheschool’svision.

Theschool’sFamilyandCommunityEngagementCommitteeisactive.Theschoolcollaborateswithmanycommunitypartnerstohelpaddresscommunityneeds.

StatementofPractice5.5:Theschoolleaderandstudentsupportstaffworktogetherwithteacherstoestablishstructurestosupporttheuseofdatatorespondtostudentsocialandemotionaldevelopmentalhealthneeds.

ToaddresschallengesinYear1,asystemoftrackingstudentreferralsanduseofRestorativePracticeshasbeenimplementedinYear2.LowerSchoolsocialworkersassessedstudents’socialemotionalneedsusinganassessment.

Tenet6-FamilyandCommunityEngagement:Theschoolcreatesacultureofpartnershipwherefamilies,communitymembersandschoolstaffworktogethertoshareintheresponsibilityforstudentacademicprogressandsocial-emotionalgrowthandwell-being.

StatementofPractice6.2:Theschoolleaderensuresthatregularcommunicationwithstudentsandfamiliesfosterstheirhighexpectationsforstudentacademicachievement.

Posterswiththeschool’smissionandvisionarepostedaroundthebuilding,asaregraduationrates,anddatawallsshowingstudentprogress.Teachersandstaffwouldlikeclearermessagefromleadershiptostudentsaboutexpectations.

StatementofPractice6.3:Theschoolengagesineffectiveplanningandreciprocalcommunicationwithfamilyandcommunitystakeholderssothatstudentstrengthandneedsareidentifiedandusedtoaugmentlearning. Unabletoassess.

StatementofPractice6.4:Theschoolcommunitypartnerswithfamiliesandcommunityagenciestopromoteandprovidetrainingacrossallareas(academicandsocialandemotionaldevelopmentalhealth)tosupportstudentsuccess.

Theschoolcontinuedmanyrelationshipswithlong-termpartnersatEastandengagedwithnewpartnerstomeetthesocial,health,andacademicneedsofstudents,aswellastoaddressmanyneedsthatparents/familiesface.Examplesincludeadvocatesforstudents,afoodpantryonsite,theonsiteHealthCenter,dentalservices,andmore.

Page 125: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–119–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

TenetsandStandardsofPractice AssessmentofEastEPO

StatementofPractice6.5:Theschoolsharesdatainawaythatpromotesdialogueamongparents,students,andschoolcommunitymemberscenteredonstudentlearningandsuccessandencouragesandempowersfamiliestounderstandandusedatatoadvocateforappropriatesupportservicesfortheirchildren.

Theschoolismakingprogressinthisdirection.StudentslookatdataandevidenceoflearninginFamilyGroupandSupport.Student-ledconferencesareasteptowardincludingparentsinthedialogue.

Page 126: Evaluation of the East EPO - UR CUESurcues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/East-EPO-Evaluation-Year-2-Report_July_12_2017-1.pdfEvaluation of the East EPO: Year 2. San Francisco, WestEd

–120–

EvaluationoftheEastEPO:Year2

ReferencesHitt,D.H.,&Meyers,C.V.(2017).Promisingleadershippracticesforrapidschoolimprovementthatlasts.SanFrancisco,CA:WestEd

Leithwood,K.,Harris,A.,&Strauss,T.(2010).Leadingschoolturnaround:Howsuccessfulleaderstransformlow-performingschools.SanFrancisco,CA:Jossey-Bass.

TheCenteronSchoolTurnaround.(2017).Fourdomainsforrapidschoolimprovement:Asystemsframework.SanFrancisco,CA:WestEd