evaluation of the 2016 env57/metroerm measurement ... of the 2016 env57/metroerm measurement...
Post on 30-Mar-2018
214 views
Embed Size (px)
TRANSCRIPT
Timotheos Altzitzoglou
Petya Malo
Evaluation of the 2016 ENV57/MetroERM
measurement comparison on simulated
airborne particulates: 137Cs, 134Cs and 131I in air filters
2017
EUR xxxxx xx (in
white where
appropriate)
EUR 28431 EN
This publication is a Technical report by the Joint Research Centre (JRC), the European Commissions science
and knowledge service. It aims to provide evidence-based scientific support to the European policymaking
process. The scientific output expressed does not imply a policy position of the European Commission. Neither
the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use that
might be made of this publication.
Contact information
Name: Timotheos Altzitzoglou
Address: European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Directorate for Nuclear Safety and Security
Email: timotheos.altzitzoglou@ec.europa.eu
Tel.: +32 14 571266
JRC Science Hub
https://ec.europa.eu/jrc
JRC105477
EUR 28431 EN
PDF ISBN 978-92-79-65276-9 ISSN 1831-9424 doi:10.2760/030337
Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2017
European Atomic Energy Community, 2017
The reuse of the document is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the original meaning or
message of the texts are not distorted. The European Commission shall not be held liable for any consequences
stemming from the reuse.
How to cite this report: Timotheos Altzitzoglou, Petya Malo; Evaluation of the 2016 ENV57/MetroERM
measurement comparison on simulated airborne particulates: 137Cs, 134Cs and 131I in air filters; EUR 28431 EN;
doi:10.2760/030337
All images European Atomic Energy Community, 2017
Contents
Acknowledgements ............................................................................................ 1
Abstract ........................................................................................................... 3
1. Introduction ............................................................................................... 5
2. The 2016 ENV57 MetroERM measurement comparison ..................................... 7
2.1 Description of the sample ........................................................................ 7
2.2 Participating laboratories ......................................................................... 7
2.3 Reporting of results ................................................................................ 8
2.4 Timetable of the ILC ............................................................................... 8
3. The Reference value .................................................................................... 9
3.1 Standardisation of the spike solution ......................................................... 9
3.1.1 137Cs ............................................................................................. 10
3.1.2 134Cs ............................................................................................. 11
3.1.3 131I ................................................................................................ 11
3.2 Dilutions .............................................................................................. 12
3.3 Spiking of the air filters ......................................................................... 14
3.4 Reference values .................................................................................. 14
3.5 Quality control measurements ................................................................ 15
3.6 Influence of discrete spiked activity distribution on the counting efficiency... 15
4. Questionnaire on sampling method, air filter used and measurement conditions 20
5. Questionnaire on analytical and measurement procedures ............................. 21
6. Evaluation and comparison of the results ..................................................... 22
6.1 Identification of outliers and normal distribution test ................................. 22
6.2 Scores and evaluation criteria ................................................................ 23
6.2.1 Percentage difference ...................................................................... 23
6.2.2 En number ...................................................................................... 24
6.2.3 Compatibility test ............................................................................ 24
6.2.4 PomPlot ......................................................................................... 24
7. Results .................................................................................................... 26
7.1 137Cs ................................................................................................... 26
7.1.1 Reported results ............................................................................. 26
7.1.2 Evaluation ...................................................................................... 31
7.1.3 Parameters possibly influencing the results ........................................ 35
7.1.4 Comparison to the 2003 and the 2014 EC ILC .................................... 36
7.2 134Cs ................................................................................................... 38
7.2.1 Reported results ............................................................................. 38
7.2.2 Evaluation ...................................................................................... 43
7.2.3 Parameters possibly influencing the results: Coincidence summing
correction ............................................................................................... 46
7.3 131I ..................................................................................................... 48
7.3.1 Reported results ............................................................................. 48
7.3.2 Evaluation ...................................................................................... 54
7.3.3 Parameters possibly influencing the results ........................................ 58
7.3.3.1 Decay during measurement ........................................................... 58
7.3.3.2 Coincidence summing correction .................................................... 59
7.3.3.3 Radioactivity transferred to the protective plastic bag ....................... 59
7.3.4 Conclusions .................................................................................... 61
8. Conclusions .............................................................................................. 63
References...................................................................................................... 69
List of abbreviations and definitions ................................................................... 71
List of figures .................................................................................................. 73
List of tables ................................................................................................... 75
ANNEXES........................................................................................................ 78
Annex 1: List of participating laboratories per country (in alphabetic order) ...... 78
Annex 2: Communication to the participants ................................................. 87
2A. Expression of interest ........................................................................... 87
2B. Invitation e-mail and accompanying letter ............................................... 89
2C. Registration information (e-mail) ............................................................ 91
2D. Spiked air filter dispatch (e-mail) and accompanying letter ........................ 92
2E. Information to participants during the measurement exercise .................... 95
2F. Reporting results .................................................................................. 96
2G. Communication of preliminary results to the participants .......................... 97
2H. Invitation to the Workshop ................................................................... 101
Annex 3: First questionnaire sent to the participants to collect information on air filters and sampling ................................................................................... 106
Annex 4: Responses of the participants to the questionnaire for collecting
information on air filters and sampling ......................................................... 109
Annex 5: Type, material, size and form of the air filters used by the participants .............................................................................................................. 112
Annex 6: Sequence of spiked filters and quality control sources prepared for the
1026 ENV57/MetroERM ILC exercise ............................................................ 115
Annex 7: Examples of spiked filters ............................................................. 117
Annex 8: Quality control filters and sources; measurement results and their
deviation from the reference activity values ................................................. 118
Annex 9: Reporting form and second questionnaire for submitting the measurement results ............................................
Recommended