evaluation of an enzyme immunoassay for the detection of the insect growth regulator fenoxycarb in...
TRANSCRIPT
Evaluation of an enzyme immunoassay forthe detection of the insect growth regulatorfenoxycarb in environmental and biologicalsamples†
Hong TM Le,1 Ferenc Szurdoki2‡ and Andras Szekacs1*1Plant Protection Institute, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, PO Box 102, H-1525 Budapest, Hungary2Department of Entomology, University of California, 1 Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA
Abstract: A competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for fenoxycarb was adapted for
quantitative detection of this insect growth regulator in various environmental, agricultural, food and
biological matrices. Environmental samples were taken from soil and surface waters in Hungary. The
ELISA enabled fenoxycarb detection in surface waters in the 1.1–125ng ml�1 concentration range
without sample cleanup. In contrast, soil produced a strong matrix effect due to humic acids and other
soil components. Several fruit homogenates and commercial fruit juices (eg apple, pear, grape) were
analyzed by the ELISA. The assay was found to be suitable for analysis of fenoxycarb in fruit juices
diluted 1:40. Biological samples included insect, fish and bovine tissues. The ELISA was applied to
detect fenoxycarb in various biological matrices from larvae of the silkworm, Bombyx mori L. The
assay proved useful for the analysis of haemolymph diluted 1:10 or at higher dilutions. Fat body and
whole body homogenates, however, caused severe matrix effects. Fenoxycarb was detected in liver
homogenates (diluted 1:40) from fish treated with various doses of fenoxycarb, and the concentrations
determined correlated with the applied doses. The method was used to analyze spiked bovine urine
samples diluted 1:10 or at greater dilutions. Fenoxycarb content determined by the ELISA in water and
fruit juice samples was validated using GC-MS with solid-phase microextraction (SPME) sample
preparation. The results of these studies demonstrated both the value and limitations of the assay when
used for monitoring fenoxycarb in environmental, food and biological samples.
# 2003 Society of Chemical Industry
Keywords: fenoxycarb; ELISA; water, soil, food; fruit juice; biological tissues; Bombyx mori; haemolymph; fishliver; bovine urine
1 INTRODUCTIONFenoxycarb (ethyl 2-(4-phenoxyphenoxy)ethylcarba-
mate; Insegar; Fig 1, 1), a broad activity spectrum
insect growth regulator (IGR) is used in stored
products, forestry, agriculture and as a public health
insecticide.1–4 The compound exhibits its biological
activity over a wide range of insect pests, except for
thrips5 and ticks,6 and it has been used in integrated
pest management practices.1,7,8 The main mode of
action of fenoxycarb and its proinsecticide analogues9
is to mimic the action of juvenile hormone (JH),
although the compound has been shown to exert more
complex effects in the insect hormonal system.10–12
The fate of fenoxycarb in the ecosystem and its
effects on non-target organisms have been studied in
depth.13,14 Although it is much more selective than
conventional insecticides, and causes no harmful
effects to ruminants (eg sheep) at registered agricul-
tural doses,15 fenoxycarb can exert adverse effects
against some beneficial and non-target insects,16
Figure 1. The chemical structures of fenoxycarb (1) and its haptenicderivatives (2, 3) applied in the optimized ELISA systems. The aminogroups of the haptens were utilized to link the molecule to carrier proteins.
(Received 5 May 2002; revised version received 14 October 2002; accepted 25 October 2002)
* Correspondence to: Andras Szekacs, Plant Protection Institute, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, PO Box 102, H-1525 Budapest, HungaryE-mail: [email protected]† One of a collection of papers on various aspects of current research on pest management in Hungary, collated by Dr Istvan Ujvary‡ Current address: Minerva Biotechnologies Corp, Rosenstiel Building, 6th Floor, 415 South Street, Waltham, MA 02453, USAContract/grant sponsor: Hungarian Ministry of Education; contract/grant number: OMFB 02193/1999Contract/grant sponsor: Hungarian Research Fund (OTKA); contract/grant number: T032232
# 2003 Society of Chemical Industry. Pest Manag Sci 1526–498X/2003/$30.00 410
Pest Management Science Pest Manag Sci 59:410–416 (online: 2003)DOI: 10.1002/ps.656
aquatic arthropods17–20 and fish.2,3,21 It has also been
implicated in the production of non-spinning syn-
drome of the silkworm, Bombyx mori L.3,11,22,23 As a
consequence, analysis of this IGR in environmental
material is becoming an important issue.
Traditional analytical methods for fenoxycarb, such
as TLC, HPLC24–28 and GC,24,27,29–32 require costly
extraction and clean-up procedures.24,25 Enzyme-
linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) provide a
simple, cost-effective alternative to overcome the
limitations of traditional pesticide residue analysis
techniques. Since such a rapid analysis method for
insect and other biological tissues would also aid
studies on the mode of action and clearance of
fenoxycarb, ELISA systems for its detection have
been developed in our laboratories33,34 and by other
research groups.22,35 In the present paper we discuss
the application of the ELISA systems that we have
developed for fenoxycarb to environmental samples
and various biological tissues.
2 MATERIALS AND METHODS2.1 ReagentsFenoxycarb was extracted from a commercially avail-
able 250g kg�1 WP (Insegar 25WP, Syngenta, Basel,
Switzerland) using chloroformþethyl acetate (1þ1;
by volume). Gelatin from bovine skin was obtained
from Reanal Rt (Budapest, Hungary) and other
chemicals were purchased from Aldrich Chemical
Co (Milwaukee, WI, USA). Biological reagents and
immunobiologicals were purchased from Sigma
Chemical Co (St Louis, MO, USA) or from ICN
ImmunoBiological (Lisle, IL, USA), except for goat
anti rabbit immunoglubulin (IgG) conjugated to
horseradish peroxidase (HRP) that was obtained from
BioRad Laboratories (Hercules, CA, USA). Solvents
used were of analytical grade, and were purchased
from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany) or Aldrich
Chemical Co. Standard solutions of fenoxycarb and
related compounds were prepared in methanol and
stored in a freezer.
2.2 ApparatusELISA experiments were carried out in 96-well poly-
styrene microplates purchased from Nunc (Roskilde,
Denmark, cat No 442404). Absorbances in the wells
of the microplates were read on an iEMS spectro-
photometric microplate reader (Labsystems, Helsinki,
Finland). The microplate reader was controlled and
data were evaluated in a computer using the software
package Ascent provided by the same manufacturer.
GC-MS analyses were carried out on a Saturn 2000
workstation (Varian, Walnut Creek, CA, USA)
2.3 ELISAHaptenic compounds and protein conjugates were
prepared and ELISA systems were developed as
reported previously.34 ELISA tests were performed
on 96-well microplates using the appropriate BSA-
conjugate as sensitizing antigen diluted in carbonate
buffer (0.1M, pH 9.6; 100ml per well). Conjugates
were immobilized by incubating the plates at 4°C for
12h, and wells were blocked by incubation at 4°C for
1h with a solution of gelatin (from bovine skin;
10g litre�1) in 0.01M phosphate-buffered saline
(PBS; 8g sodium chloride litre�1; pH 7.4; 150ml perwell) at 4°C for 1h. The plate was washed with PBS
containing Tween 20 surfactant (PBST 0.2; 2ml
litre�1), and samples or standard solutions diluted in
PBS buffer containing Tween 20 (PBST 0.05; 0.5ml
litre�1) and aqueous methanol (5ml litre�1) were
added to the wells (50ml per well), followed by the
antiserum diluted in PBST 0.05 (50ml per well). Plateswere incubated at 37°C for 1h, washed with PBST
0.2, and the enzyme-labelled second antibody (goat
anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to HRP) was added at a
dilution of 1:12000 in PBST 0.05 (100ml per well).
The plate was incubated at 37°C for 1h, washed with
PBST 0.2, and enzymatic activity was detected using a
chromogenic substrate solution (100ml per well) con-taining o-phenylenediame (OPD; 320mg ml�1) and
hydrogen peroxide (0.3ml litre�1). Following incu-
bation with the substrate at room temperature, the
enzymatic reaction was stopped by adding 2M sulfuric
acid to the wells (50ml per well), and absorbancies
were read immediately at 492nm. To prepare stan-
dard calibration curves for fenoxycarb, the methanolic
stock solution was diluted with appropriate volumes of
PBST 0.05 to give a dilution series. Sigmoid standard
curves were calculated from absorbance data measures
using the Rodbard equation.36
2.4 Application of the ELISA method onenvironmental and biological samples2.4.1 Surface waterWater samples tested included distilled water, tap
water and various surface water samples [water from
the River Danube and surface, lake and river water
samples collected throughout Hungary by the Soil
Conservation and Plant Hygiene Service (SCPHS)].
Within the scope of a national monitoring programme,
197 surface water samples were received in annual
sampling campaigns from SCPHS, 37 raw drinking
water samples (prior to chlorination) were received
from Wedeco Ltd (Vac, Hungary), and 4 tap water
and purified water samples were additionally used as
controls. Tap water and water from the Danube
contained no floating particles so no filtration step was
necessary prior to analysis. Water samples were used
without any purification or dilution; their pH was
adjusted to 7.4 (surface water samples were slightly
alkaline, their pH ranged from 8.1 to 9.1). Standard
dilution series of fenoxycarb, starting at 5000ng ml�1
concentration, were prepared in these neutralized
water samples, and the fenoxycarb content was
detected by competitive ELISA.
2.4.2 SoilSoil samples were subjected to solvent extraction
Pest Manag Sci 59:410–416 (online: 2003) 411
ELISA for fenoxycarb in environmental and biological samples
according to the recommended FAO/WHO protocol
allowing 87–95% recoveries in a single-step metha-
nolic extraction without sample clean-up. Briefly,
methanol (50ml) was added to the soil (20g), and
the mixture was agitated on an orbital shaker (IKA
GmbH, Staufen, Germany) for 1h, after which the
extract was decanted and filtered. (Because soil
particles and humic acid subsided well, centrifugation
was not necessary.) To avoid solvent effects, metha-
nolic extracts were diluted with PBS, and standard
curves of fenoxycarb were obtained for the diluted
extracts. As a control experiment to these determina-
tions, the fenoxycarb content of spiked samples was
examined in the humic acid fraction of the same soil.
Spiked humic acids were extracted similarly to the soil
samples.
2.4.3 ProduceFruit samples were prepared for analysis according to
the recommended FAO/WHO protocol: the fruit
sample from organically grown produce (100g) was
homogenized in a laboratory blender (Ika GmbH,
Staufen, Germany) in PBS (20ml), the homogenate
was centrifuged (30min at 13000g), filtered, and the
pH of the filtrate was adjusted to 7.4 with aqueous
sodium hydroxide solution (0.1M). Fruit juices (apple,
pear, grape) were obtained from commercial sources.
Apple juice (14% fruit content, 11% dry weight), pear
juice (35% fruit content, 12.5% dry weight), grape
juice (14% fruit content, 11% dry weight) all from
Elma Rt (Ersekhalma, Hungary) were filtered and
diluted with PBS prior to analysis.
2.4.4 Biological tissuesTissue samples from the silkworm, Bombyx mori L,
received from. H Fugo and SG Dedos (Department of
Environmental Science and Resources, Tokyo Uni-
versity of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo, Japan)
included haemolymph, fat body and whole body
homogenates from larvae at various stages of develop-
ment. Haemolymph samples were used in the ELISA
at dilutions of 1:10 or at higher dilutions, spiked with
fenoxycarb between 1.22 and 5000ng ml�1 in PBS,
without sample purification. Fat body and whole body
homogenates were diluted 1:5 or 1:10 with PBS,
spiked with fenoxycarb as above, centrifuged
(12000rev min�1) to remove insoluble components,
and then subjected to ELISA analysis.
Fish liver samples were kindly provided by colla-
borators at the Department of Biochemistry at Szeged
University, Hungary. Both sexes of carp (Cyprinuscarpio L) were raised at natural daily photoperiods in
thermostated tap water aeriated 24h before the experi-
ments. Individual fish (600–800g each) were treated
intraperitoneally with fenoxycarb (0–10mg kg�1) dis-
solved in sunflower oil, using stock solutions of 0.1,
0.5, 2.0 and 20mg ml�1 concentration. Control fish
received pure sunflower oil. The fish were then kept
in separate tanks for 36h at either 14(�2)°C or
20(�2)°C. The microsomal fractions of the liver of
the subject animals, prepared accorning to Forlin,37
were frozen in liquid nitrogen, and were stored at
�80°C until used.
2.5 Detection of fenoxycarb by GC-MSFenoxycarb was detected in water and fruit juice
samples spiked with fenoxycarb using gas chroma-
tography with a mass spectrometric detector
(GC-MS). Spiked samples were prepared for GC-MS
analysis by solid phase microextraction (SPME).
Thus, 4ml portions of each sample were directly
extracted by SPME using a 65-mm-thick carbowax/
divinylbenzene (CW/DVB) fibre. SPME fibers and the
holder assembly were purchased from Supelco
(Bellefonte, PA, USA). Extraction time by immersion
of the SPME fiber was 20min at room temperature
with stirring by means of a magnetic stirrer. After
extraction, sample desorption from fibre was carried
out at 250°C by direct isothermal injection into the
GC system. GC-MS conditions were as follows: fused-
silica column CP-Sil 8 CB (Chrompack, Middleburg,
The Netherlands), 0.25mm film thickness, 30m�0.25mm ID; injection mode splitless; injector tem-
perature 230°C; column temperature programmed
from 80°C (held for 1min) to 300°C at a rate of 20°Cmin�1. Helium was used as carrier gas, pressure
0.097MPa; ionization current, 350mA; electron
energy, 70eV. The ion trap was scanning in EI mode
from 40 to 650amu. The selected ions for quantitation
of fenoxycarb were those at 116 and 88amu, the two
most abundant molecule ions from the mass spectrum.
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION3.1 Competitive inhibition ELISAs for fenoxycarbTwo optimized, immobilized antigen-based ELISA
systems were used for the determination of fenoxy-
carb: a hapten-homologous and a hapten-heterologous
immunoassay.34 The ELISAs were based on two
haptenic derivatives of fenoxycarb (2 and 3, Fig 1):
these amino compounds were diazotized and then
conjugated to proteins by azo coupling.34 Hapten
conjugates to various proteins, eg haemocyanin from
keyhole limpet (KLH) or thyroglobulin (TYG), were
used as immunogens, while bovine serum albumin
(BSA) conjugates were applied as coating antigens in
the ELISA. (Protein conjugates are referred to by the
number of the hapten and the abbreviation of the
carrier protein, eg, 2-BSA.) Assay performance of
the systems were characterized by IC50 values and the
lower limit of detection (LOD) determined in the
immunoassays. The IC50 value represents the con-
centration of the target analyte resulting in a 50%
decrease in the maximal corrected assay signal in the
competitive ELISA system. The LOD value is defined
as the analyte concentration reducing the mean blank
assay signal by three standard deviations of the blank
reading. The two optimized ELISA systems used in
the present study included a hapten-homologous
(coating: 1mg ml�1 of 3-BSA; antiserum: anti-3-
412 Pest Manag Sci 59:410–416 (online: 2003)
HTM Le, F Szurdoki, A Szekacs
TYG(3) (antiserumNo 4960) at a dilution of 1:4000),
and a hapten-heterologous system (coating:
2.5mg ml�1 of 2-BSA; antiserum: anti-3-TYG(3) at a
dilution of 1:2000), allowed high sensitivity detec-
tion of fenoxycarb (IC50 values of 2.7(�1.6) and
1.1(�0.6)ng ml�1, and LOD values of 0.2 and
0.11ng ml�1, respectively). The cross-reactivity (de-
fined as the percentage ratio of the IC50 value of a
given compound and that of fenoxycarb in the same
ELISA system) pattern of the immunoassays has been
studied before, and the two assays were found highly
selective for fenoxycarb.34
3.2 Application of the ELISA method on varioussamples3.2.1 Water samplesAssay performance was tested in various water samples
including drinking water, tap water, lake (Lakes
Balaton and Velencei, smaller ponds and water reser-
voirs) and river (Rivers Danube and Tisza, smaller
watercourses), as well as surface water samples
collected in agricultural, rural and national park areas
throughout Hungary. Standard curves in competitive
inhibition ELISA experiments were established with
fenoxycarb in each type of the above water samples
artificially contaminated with fenoxycarb. Results
indicated unchanged sensitivities and curve shapes in
comparison with standard curves obtained in distilled
water and assay buffer. Standard curves obtained in
tap water and water from the River Danube are
depicted in Fig 2(A).
3.2.2 Soil extractsSoil samples subjected to solvent extraction resulted in
methanolic extracts that were analyzed by ELISA after
dilution 1:20 with PBS. As seen from Fig 2(A), a
rather strong matrix effect was seen in this diluted soil
extract, making it practically impossible to establish a
standard inhibition curve with fenoxycarb. In order to
assess which soil component might have been respon-
sible for such a strong matrix effect, a methanolic
extract of humic acids (extracted similarly to soil
samples) was also tested for matrix effects. The
detrimental effect of humic acids on the standard
inhibition curve with fenoxycarb is apparent (Fig
2(A)), but much weaker than that of the soil extract.
Thus, it appears that matrix influences in soil extracts
are not caused only by humic acid content. On the
basis of these experiments, the ELISA system in its
present state is not applicable to the analysis of soil
extracts, which would require additional sample clean-
up prior to immunoanalysis.
3.2.3 Fruit samplesThe ELISA systems were applied to several fruits that
are commonly treated with fenoxycarb to control
insect pests. Thus, filtered homogenates and juices of
apple, pear and grape were analyzed by the ELISA.
Fruit samples homogenized in PBS or fruit juices
obtained from commercial sources were filtered,
diluted with PBS as necessary and were subjected to
ELISA. Strong matrix effects were observed in both
apple and pear homogenates. Matrix effects were
probably related to natural fibre content of the sample,
as indicated by the fact that a somewhat better
standard curve was established in apple homogenate:
the higher the fibre content in the fruit homogenate,
the stronger was the matrix effect observed. Matrix
effects were alleviated by removing fibre by centrifuga-
tion. In contrast, spiked fenoxycarb content was
readily detectable from commercial fruit juices at 1:5
or higher dilutions in apple juice and at 1:10 or higher
dilutions in grape juice (Fig 2(B)). A slight matrix
effect was seen in pear juice at a dilution of 1:10, but
this effect was eliminated at higher dilution (1:40)
using the hapten-heterologous ELISA system. Matrix
effects were similar, although somewhat more pro-
nounced in the hapten-homologous ELISA. Matrix
effects (and therefore, the dilution required for
detection of the analyte) correlate with the fibre
content of the fruit juice.
3.2.4 Insect tissuesOne of the prime fields of the possible applications of
the fenoxycarb ELISA system is the determination of
fenoxycarb in insect-based biological matrices. Moni-
toring fenoxycarb content in the haemolymph of the
silkworm, B mori, is of particular importance, because
this insect shows great sensitivity to even minute
amounts of fenoxycarb in its sole food, mulberry
leaves.12,22 The applicability of the optimized ELISA
systems was evaluated on various tissues of B morilarvae, including haemolymph, whole body homoge-
nate and fat body tissue. Figure 2(C) displays standard
curves obtained in haemolymph and whole body
homogenate at various dilutions with PBS. Results
indicate that haemolymph samples can be analyzed by
ELISA at dilutions of 1:10 or greater, while a strong
matrix effect relative to the standard curve detected in
buffer is seen in whole body homogenate even at
higher dilution and after centrifugation. The standard
curve obtained in fat body homogenate appears to be
undistorted in shape, but with a strong shift towards
higher fenoxycarb contents (decreased sensitivity).
This is likely to be due to strong physicochemical
binding of the lipophilic fenoxycarb to lipid compo-
nents of the tissue. Even stronger matrix effects were
seen when the method was applied to the fat body
tissue of the insect, where practically no detectable
standard could be obtained. Results indicate that the
immunoassay is applicable to insect haemolymph at
dilutions at or above 1:10 with PBS, but more
lipophilic samples, fat body or whole body homo-
genates, exert severe matrix effects.
3.2.5 Fish liver samplesFenoxycarb content was detected in various fractions
of fish liver extracts of untreated (control) animals and
those treated with various doses of the IGR. All three
fractions, full liver sample homogenate, and first and
Pest Manag Sci 59:410–416 (online: 2003) 413
ELISA for fenoxycarb in environmental and biological samples
second supernatant in its fractionated extraction were
subjected to ELISA determination. In control experi-
ments (fish untreated or treated with unspiked oil) no
matrix effects were seen when liver homogenate
samples were diluted above 1:40 with PBST 0.05,
and fenoxycarb was not detected in these control
samples. In contrast, fenoxycarb was detected in all
three liver tissue fractions in all treated animals.
Results (Fig 3) indicate no statistically significant
differences among fractions of individual liver
samples, but display a consistent rise in fenoxycarb
content as the treatment dosage increased.
3.2.6 Bovine blood and urineFor metabolism studies in animals, it may be necessary
to monitor fenoxycarb levels inside the body (eg blood
levels) as well as those discharged from the body
through urination. For this purpose, matrix effects on
ELISA performance were tested in bovine blood and
urine. Urine samples were tested crude, and diluted
1:10 and 1:100 in PBS. Analysis results, seen in Fig
2(D), indicate that matrix component in bovine urine
caused a detrimental effect on the assay signal that had
to be diluted out. Standard curves recorded with urine
diluted 1:10 and 1:100 with PBS did not differ
Figure 2. Standard curves for fenoxycarb in the optimized hapten-homologous ELISA system in various samples. (A) Standard curves obtained in (&—&) tapwater, (* - - *) water from the river Danube, (~ � � �~) diluted methanolic soil extract, (! - � - !) diluted methanolic extract of humic acids. (B) Standard curvesobtained in (* � � � *) assay buffer, (& - � - &) grape juice undiluted, (& --- &) diluted 1:5 and (~—~) 1:10. (C) Standard curves obtained in hemolymph fromL5D5 instar larvae of Bombyx mori (& - � - &) undiluted, (& - - &) diluted 1:10 and (*—*) 1:100. (D) Standard curves obtained in (* � � � *) buffer, (& - � - &)bovine urine undiluted, (& --- &) diluted 1:10 and (~—~) 1:100. Assay parameters: (A, B, D) 2-BSA as coating antigen at 1mg ml�1; or (C) 3-BSA at2.5mg ml�1; blocking: 1% gelatin in PBS; anti-2-TYG(3) serum at a dilution of 1:2000; anti-IgG-HRP at a dilution of 1:12000. Assays were carried out in triplicatesin a single microtitre plate in each set.
414 Pest Manag Sci 59:410–416 (online: 2003)
HTM Le, F Szurdoki, A Szekacs
statistically from that recorded in assay buffer,
indicating that fenoxycarb can be detected quantita-
tively in diluted urine samples. A more severe matrix
effect was seen in bovine blood, when both blood
platelets in full blood and immunoglobulins in the
serum seem to interfere with assay performance.
3.3 Validation of the ELISA by instrumentalanalytical (GC-MS) methodsFenoxycarb concentrations determined by ELISA
were validated in spiked water and fruit juice samples
using GC-MS with SPME for sample extraction.
Because none of the 238 water samples, including
drinking water, tap water, lake water and river water,
as well as surface water samples collected in 2000 and
2001 in agricultural, rural and national park areas
throughout Hungary, contained fenoxycarb, positive
field samples could not be used for assay validation.
Therefore, representative surface water samples spiked
with fenoxycarb were subjected to both GC-MS and
ELISA analyses. The GC retention time of fenoxycarb
(10.7min) allowed a rapid and convenient method of
analysis. Spiked fenoxycarb content (eleven concen-
trations between 0 and 55ng ml�1) detected by GC-
MS in water and diluted (1:40) fruit juice samples
were cross-validated and correlated with correspond-
ing concentrations detected by the ELISA systems.
The results of this validation, based on five calibration
points in water, three points in diluted apple juice and
three points in diluted grape juice, indicate good
correlation (conc(GC�MS)=1.021 conc(ELISA)þ0.384,
n =11, r2=0.976), and the regression slope is very
close to 1, verifying correct detection by both ELISAs.
None the less, a small intercept of the regression line,
and the consequent fact that the regression line runs
close to, but continuously above, the diagonal,
indicates a slight overestimation by the ELISA systems
relative to the GC-MS method.
4 CONCUSIONSEvaluation of our recently developed ELISA system to
detect fenoxycarb in environmental and biological
samples spiked with the analyte demonstrated that the
assay is applicable to surface waters without sample
cleanup or dilution. The ELISA was also suitable for
the detection of spiked fenoxycarb in diluted apple,
grape and pear juices (dilutions 1:5, 1:10 and 1:40,
respectively), haemolymph (diluted 1:10) from B morilarvae, and diluted (1:10) bovine urine. Furthermore,
the immunoassay detected fenoxycarb in liver
homogenates of fish treated with various doses of this
IGR. Therefore, the ELISA method can be utilized to
complement or replace instrumental analytical
methods to analyze fenoxycarb in these matrices.
Further work is required to eliminate severe matrix
effects caused by soil extracts, fruit homogenates,
lipophilic insect tissues and bovine blood. The assay
offered high sensitivity similar to or better than those
of other ELISAs for fenoxycarb.22,35 Using this
immunoassay, studies on the mode of action and
clearance of fenoxycarb in B mori haemolymph are in
progress.38,39
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSWe thank H Fugo and SGDedos at the Department of
Environmental Science and Resources, Faculty of
Agriculture, Tokyo University of Agriculture and
Technology (Tokyo, Japan) for tissue samples of the
silkworm, and M Abraham and A Deri at the
Department of Biochemistry at Szeged University,
(Szeged, Hungary) for treated and control carp liver
samples. The authors wish to express their sincere
appreciation to pesticide analysts at SCPHS
(Hungary) for providing surface water samples.
Special thanks are due to L Gyorfi (SCPHS
Budapest), G Karoly (SCPHS Csopak Station) and
E Majzik (SCPHS Velence Station) for their expert
assistance. This work was supported by Hungarian
research grants OMFB 02193/1999 by the Hun-
garian Ministry of Education and T032232 by the
Hungarian Research Fund (OTKA).
REFERENCES1 Dorn S, FrischknechtML,Martinez V, Zurfluh R and Fischer U,
A novel non-neurotoxic insecticide with a broad activity
spectrum. Z Pflkrankh Pflschutz 88:269–275 (1981).
2 US EPA, Fenoxycarb, in Pesticide fact handbook, Vol 1, Noyes
Data Corp, Park Ridge, NJ, USA, pp 373–377 (1988).
3 Grenier S and Grenier AM, Fenoxycarb, a fairly new insect
growth regulator: a review of its effects on insects. Ann Appl
Biol 122:369–403 (1993).
4 Darvas B, El-Kareim AIA, Camporese P, Farag AI, Matolcsy G
and Ujvary I, Effects of some new proinsecticide-type
fenoxycarb derivatives and related compounds on some scale
insects and their hymenopterous parasitiods. J Appl Entomol
118:51–58 (1994).
5 Ludwig SW and Oetting RD, Evaluation of medium treatments
for management of Frankliniella occidentalis (Thripidae: Thy-
sanoptera) and Bradysia coprophila (Diptera: Sciaridae). Pest
Manag Sci 57:1114–1118 (2001).
Figure 3. Fenoxycarb content detected by ELISA in fractions of fish liversamples. The liver fractions analyzed: liver homogenate (black column),first supernatant (grey hairlined column) and second supernatant (whitecolumn) were diluted 1:40 with PBST prior to analysis. Assay parameters:2-BSA as coating antigen at 1mg ml�1; blocking: 1% gelatin in PBS;anti-2-TYG(3) serum at a dilution of 1:4000; anti-IgG-HRP at a dilution of1:12000. Assays were carried out in triplicates in a single microtitre plate.
Pest Manag Sci 59:410–416 (online: 2003) 415
ELISA for fenoxycarb in environmental and biological samples
6 Slusser JH and Sonenshine DE, Absence of ovicidal effects of
fenoxycarb in the tick Ixodes dammini as observed by light,
scanning, and transmission electron microscopy. J Med
Entomol 29:115–117 (1992).
7 Solomon MG and Fitzgerald JD, Fenoxycarb, a selective
insecticide for inclusion in integrated pest management
systems for pear in the UK. J Hortic Sci 65:535–539 (1990).
8 Hoddle MS, Van Driesche RG, Lyon SM and Sanderson J,
Compatibility of insect growth regulators with Eretmocerus
eremicus (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) for whitefly (Homo-
ptera: Aleyrodidae) control on poinsettias: I. Laboratory
assays. Biol Control 20:122–131 (2001).
9 Ujvary I, Matolcsy G, Belai I, Szurdoki F, Bauer K, Varjas L and
Kramer KJ, Projuvenoids: synthesis and biological evaluation
of sulfenylated, sulfinylated, and sulfonylated carbamates. Arch
Insect Biochem Physiol 32:659–669 (1996).
10 Dhadialla TS, Carlson GR and Le DP, New insecticides with
ecdysteroidal and juvenile hormone activity. Annu Rev Entomol
43:545–569 (1998).
11 Dedos SG and Fugo H, Downregulation of the cAMP signal
transduction cascade in the prothoracic glands is responsible
for the fenoxycarb-mediated induction of permanent 5th instar
larvae in Bombyx mori. Insect Biochem Physiol 29:723–729
(1999).
12 Monconduit H and Mauchamp B, Fenoxycarb, a potent con-
taminant of the silkworm, Bombyx mori L, does not influence
its juvenile hormone titer. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 40:141–
149 (1999).
13 Arzone A, Dolci M, Marletto F and Minero C, Translocation of
fenoxycarb in the agro-ecosystem. Biosci Biotech Biochem
7:1318–1319 (1995).
14 Darvas B and Polgar LA, Novel-type insecticides: specificity and
effects on non-target organisms, in Insecticides with novel modes
of action. Mechanisms and application, ed by Ishaaya I and
Degheele D, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany, pp 188–259
(1998).
15 Barr AC, Abbitt B, Fiske RA, Jaques JT, Maynard HR and
Reagor JC, Reproductive effects of fenoxycarb on sheep. J Vet
Diagn Invest 9:401–406 (1997).
16 Bortolotti L, Porrini C, Sbrenna AM and Sbrenna G, Ovicidal
action of fenoxycarb on a predator, Chrysoperla carnea
(Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Appl Entomol Zool 35:265–270
(2000).
17 Key PB and Scott GI, The chronic toxicity of fenoxycarb to
larvae of the grass shrimp, Palaemonetes pugio. J Environ Sci
Health B29:873–894 (1994).
18 Hosmer AJ, Warren LW and Ward TJ, Chronic toxicity of
pulse-dosed fenoxycarb to Daphnia magna exposed to environ-
mentally realistic concentrations. Environ Toxicol Chem
17:1860–1866 (1998).
19 Nates SF and McKenney CL Jr, Growth, lipid class and fatty
acid composition in juvenile mud crabs (Rhithropanopeus
harrisii) following larval exposure to fenoxycarb, insect juvenile
hormone analog. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol
127:317–325 (2000).
20 Rose RM, Warne MS and Lim RP, Food concentration affects
the life history response of Ceriodaphnia cf dubia to chemicals
with different mechanisms of action. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf
51:106–114 (2002).
21 Lee BM and Scott GI, Acute toxicity of temephos, fenoxycarb,
diflubenzuron, and methoprene and Bacillus thuringiensis var
israeliensis to the mummichog (Fundulus heteroclitus). Bull
Environ Contam Toxicol 43:827–832 (1989).
22 Giraudi G, Goivannoli C, Baggiani C, Rosso I, Coletto P, Dolci
M, Grassi G and Vanni A, Enzyme immunoassay for the
determination of the insecticide fenoxycarb. Anal Commun
35:183–185 (1998).
23 Takahashi M, Kiuchi M and Kamimura M, A new chitinase-
related gene, BmChiR1, is induced in the Bombyx mori anterior
silk gland at molt and metamorphosis by ecdysteroid. Insect
Biochem Mol Biol 32:147–151 (2002).
24 Haenni RP and Mueller PA, Fenoxycarb, in Analytical methods
for pesticides and plant growth regulators, Vol XVI, ed by Sherma
J, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA, pp 21–29 (1988).
25 Bicchi C, D’Amato A, Tonutti I and Cantamessa L, Simul-
taneous determination of clofentezine, fenoxycarb and hexy-
thiazox by HPLC on apples, pears and their pulps. Pestic Sci
30:13–19 (1990).
26 Stan H-J and Schwarzer F, On-line coupling of liquid chroma-
tography with thin-layer chromatography. J Chromatogr A
819:35–44 (1998).
27 Wang Z, Hennion B, Urruty L and Montury M, Solid-phase
microextraction coupled with high performance liquid
chromatography: a complementary technique to solid-phase
microextraction–gas chromatography for the analysis of
pesticide residues in strawberries. Food Addit Contam 17:915–
923 (2000).
28 Fernandez M, Pico Y and Manes J, Determination of carbamate
residues in fruits and vegetables by matrix solid-phase
dispersion and liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. J
Chromatogr A 871:43–56 (2000).
29 Reyzer ML and Brodbelt JS, Analysis of fire ant pesticides in
water by solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography/
mass spectrometry or high-performance liquid chromatogra-
phy/mass spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta 436:11–20 (2001).
30 Climent MJ and Miranda MA, Gas chromatographic–mass
spectrometric study of photodegradation of carbamate pesti-
cides. J Chromatogr A 738:225–231 (1996) [Erratum in: J
Chromatogr A 761:341 (1997)].
31 Natangelo M, Tavazzi S, Fanelli R and Benfenati E, Analysis of
some pesticides in water samples using solid-phase micro-
extraction–gas chromatography with different mass spectro-
metric techniques. J Chromatogr A 859:193–201 (1999).
32 Rossi S, Dalpero AP, Ghini S, Colombo R, Sabatini AG and
Girotti S, Multiresidual method for the gas chromatographic
analysis of pesticides in honeybees cleaned by gel permeation
chromatography. J Chromatogr A 905:223–232 (2001).
33 Szurdoki F, Jaeger L, Harris A, Kido H, Wengatz I, Goodrow
MH, Szekacs A, Wortberg M, Zheng J, Stoutamire DW,
Sanborn JR, Gilman SD, Jones AD, Gee SJ, Choudary PV and
Hammock BD, Rapid assays for environmental and biological
monitoring. J Environ Sci Health B30:451–458 (1995).
34 Szurdoki F, Szekacs A, Le HM and Hammock BD, Synthesis
of haptens and protein conjugates for the development of
immunoassays for the insect growth regulator fenoxycarb. J
Agric Food Chem 50:29–40 (2002).
35 Drs E, Pichler H, Anfossi L, Giraudi G and Krska R, Devel-
opment of an enzyme-immunoassay for the determination of
the insecticide fenoxycarb based on egg-yolk antibodies from
immunized chickens, Abstr, 5th Euroconference on Environ-
mental Analytical Chemistry, Sept 8–12, 2001, Blarney, Ireland.
36 Rodbard D, Mathematics and statistics of ligand assays. An
illustrated guide, In Ligand assay: analysis of international
developments on isotopic and nonisotopic immunoassay, ed by
Langan J and Clapp JJ, Masson Publ, NY, USA, pp 45–99
(1981).
37 Forlin L, Effects of Clophen A50, 3-methylcolanthrene, pregne-
nolone -16a-carbonitrile and phenobarbital on the hepatic
microsomal cytochrome P-450-dependent monooxygenase
system in rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri, of different age and
sex. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 54:420–430 (1980).
38 Dedos SG, Szurdoki F, Szekacs A, Mizoguchi A and Fugo H,
Induction of dauer pupae by fenoxycarb in the silkworm,
Bombyx mori. J Insect Physiol 48:857–865 (2002).
39 Dedos SG, Szurdoki F, Szekacs A, Shiotsuki T, Hammock BD,
Shimada J and Fugo H, Fenoxycarb levels and their effects on
general and juvenile hormone esterase activity in the haemo-
lymph of the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Pestic Biochem Physiol
73:174–187 (2002).
416 Pest Manag Sci 59:410–416 (online: 2003)
HTM Le, F Szurdoki, A Szekacs