evaluation for prioritization of epidemiological modeling

61
Epidemiological Modeling and Economic Evaluation for Prioritization of Limited Public Health Resources Kaja Abbas, PhD, MPH Assistant Professor of Infectious Diseases in Public Health One-Health Public Health Program @ Virginia Tech Department of Population Health Sciences, Virginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine Department of Basic Sciences, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine

Upload: others

Post on 01-Jan-2022

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Epidemiological Modeling and Economic Evaluation for Prioritization of

Limited Public Health Resources

Kaja Abbas, PhD, MPHAssistant Professor of Infectious Diseases in Public Health

One-Health Public Health Program @ Virginia TechDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Virginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine

Department of Basic Sciences, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine

Page 2: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Epidemiological Modeling and Economic Evaluation for Prioritization of

Limited Public Health Resources:Infectious Disease Perspective

Kaja Abbas, PhD, MPHNarges Dorratoltaj, MS

Jennifer SamuelsKarina Platt, MPH

Paige Bordwine, MPHMargarat O’Dell, MD, MFA

Thomas Kerkering, MDKerry Redican, PhD, MSPH, MPH

Page 3: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Objective● To conduct cost-effectiveness analysis of

infectious disease interventions and assist in prioritization of limited public health resources.

● New River Valley, Virginia, USA○ Infectious disease outbreaks

■ Pertussis■ Tuberculosis■ Fungal meningitis

Page 4: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

New River ValleyNew River Health District

Page 5: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Pertussis2011 outbreak

Page 6: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Pertussis● Bacteria

○ bordetella pertussis

● Symptoms○ whooping cough○ fever

● Transmission○ air-borne

CDC

Page 7: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Pertussis infection timeline

Page 8: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

● DTaP vaccine○ Diptheria○ Tetanus○ Pertussis

Vaccine

Page 9: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Vaccines

Page 10: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Basic reproduction rate - Ro

● Ro○ Average number of

secondary cases caused by the primary case in a susceptible population

● Epidemic○ Ro > 1

● Endemic○ Ro = 1

● Elimination○ Ro < 1

● Eradication○ Ro = 0

Effective reproductive rate R ~ Ro * (1 - interventions impact)

Page 11: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

R and vaccination● Elimination

○ R < 1

f = fraction of population that are vaccinated(1 - f) = fraction of susceptible population

● For herd immunity○ minimum fraction/threshold (fh) of

population to be vaccinated■ R = Ro (1 - fh) < 1■ fh > 1 - (1 / Ro) ● Pertussis

○ Herd immunity ~ (92-94)%

Page 12: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

DTaP vaccine

Page 13: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Pertussis incidence - Virginia

Page 14: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

● 72 cases

● Prime impact○ private school

■ vaccination rate ~ 0%

Pertussis outbreak (2011)New River Valley

Page 15: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

● Vaccination & health education campaigns

● Vaccine clinics○ school○ community

New River Health DistrictIntervention

Page 16: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Economic evaluationICER - Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio

Page 17: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

● New River Health District○ employee hours○ number of vaccines○ clinical hours

● US Census Data○ average salary of various positions

● CDC ○ vaccine price list archive

■ cost of vaccines

Data sources (cost)

Page 18: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Intervention cost

Page 19: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

● DALY○ Disability Adjusted Life Year

● YLL○ Years of Life Lost due to premature death

● YLD (Years Lived with Disability)○ Years of Life Lost due to Disability

■ population: (prevalence) * (disability weight)● individual: (years with disability) * (disability weight)

● DALY = YLL + YLD

DALY, YLL, YLD

Page 20: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

DALY = YLL + YLD

Page 21: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

DALY = YLL + YLD

Page 22: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

LE = Average Life Expectancy = 78.7MR = Mortality rate of pertussis worldwide = .001 I = Number of Confirmed Cases = 72DW = Pertussis Disability Weight = .137

DALY = YLL + YLD

Page 23: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

DALY = YLL + YLD = 4.28 + 1.63= 5.91 DALYs

Cost of Intervention = $44,133.24Cost of no Intervention = $0

ICER = $44133.24 / 5.91 DALYs

ICER = $7,468 / DALY averted

ICERIncremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio

Page 24: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Cost-effectiveness thresholds

Page 25: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Decision criteria (WHO-CHOICE)

Page 26: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

● Comparator○ new intervention○ current intervention

● Costs● Effectiveness

○ direct protection○ indirect protection

● Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)

Cost-effectiveness analysis of infectious diseases’ interventions

● Perspective● Time horizon● Discounting● Uncertainty

○ sensitivity analysis■ deterministic■ probabilistic

● Modeling○ static

■ decision tree■ Markov model

○ dynamic

Page 27: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Tuberculosis2011 outbreak

Page 28: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Tuberculosis● Bacteria

○ Mycobacterium tuberculosis

● Symptoms○ respiratory problems

● Transmission○ air-borne

● Latent TB infection ○ ~ ⅓ global

■ asymptomatic■ non-infectious

● Active TB disease■ symptomatic■ infectious

Page 29: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Government Hospital of Thoracic MedicineChennai, India

Page 30: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

TB Sanatorium, Rochester NY

Page 31: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling
Page 32: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling
Page 33: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Tuberculosis outbreak (2011)New River Valley

● New River Valley jail○ 1 case

■ 41 year old■ 6 month history of TB symptoms■ HIV+

○ admitted to hospital■ TB and HIV drug treatment■ isolation

Page 34: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

● Inmate population○ week day

■ 880○ weekend

■ 930-940

● New inmates○ ~ (50-60) / week

● Employees○ ~ 200

New River Valley Regional Jail

Page 35: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

LTBI treatment - 3HP● 3 month treatment

○ once a week■ isoniazid■ rifapentine

● DOT○ directly observed therapy

Page 36: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

● 35 inmates○ PPT+○ chest x-ray -○ HIV -

● 28 inmates○ 3HP treatment○ 17 completed

LTBI treatment● 21 staff

○ PPT+○ chest x-ray -○ HIV -

● 10 staff○ 3HP treatment

Page 37: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

SEIS (Susceptibles-Exposed-Infectious-Susceptibles)tuberculosis

Page 38: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

SEIStuberculosis

Page 39: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

TB transmission dynamics

Page 40: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

SEIS epidemiological model(Susceptibles-Exposed-Infectious-Susceptibles)

Page 41: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Scenario simulations● Base-case scenario

○ No TB pre-screening● Intervention scenario

○ TB pre-screening

Page 42: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

ICER = - $15,461 / DALY averted (cost saving)

ICERIncremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio

Page 43: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Fungal Meningitis2012 outbreak

Page 44: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Fungal meningitis● Fungus

● Symptoms○ headache○ stiff neck○ fatigue

● Transmission○ non-contagious

● New England compounding center○ contaminated lots of

methylprednisolone acetate ■ used in epidural

spinal injections

Page 45: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Fungal meningitis outbreak● Health facilities

○ 23 states■ received

contaminated lots

○ 20 states■ 751 cases■ 64 deaths

● Virginia○ 54 cases○ 5 deaths

Page 46: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Fungal meningitis outbreak (2012)New River Valley

94 exposed residents

Kate Corvese, 2012

Page 47: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Surveillance process

Page 48: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Time & costs

Page 49: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

ICERIncremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio

DALY = 73.5 DALYs avertedCost of Intervention = $30,492

ICER = $415 / DALY averted

Page 50: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

PertussisTuberculosis

Fungal Meningitis

Comparative analysis of different interventions

Uniform metric: ICER = $/DALY averted

Page 51: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Prioritization of limited public health resources

Intervention ICERTuberculosis -$15,461/DALY averted

(Cost saving)

Fungal meningitis $415 / DALY averted

Pertussis $7,468 / DALY averted

Page 52: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

● DCP3○ summarize and synthesize evidence of the

effectiveness of global health interventions and provide comparative economic evaluation of policies to implement those interventions■ http://www.dcp-3.org

Disease control priorities project

Page 53: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)

Page 54: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

● Research○ Modeling infectious

diseases■ Epidemiology■ Economics

○ Public Health Services & Systems Research■ Health services

● Organization● Financing● Delivery

Welcome collaborations!● Teaching

○ Infectious disease epidemiology

○ Modeling infectious diseases

[email protected]

Page 55: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Research, policy & practice

Page 56: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Public health challenges

Page 57: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Public health challenge focus● Individual health

○ treatment focused clinical care

● Population health○ prevention focused

community programs ■ multi-sectoral

● cooperation● coordination

Page 58: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Transdisciplinary collaborative solutions

Page 59: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Acknowledgements● Students

○ Karina Platt■ Pertussis

○ Jennifer Samuels■ Tuberculosis

○ Narges Dorratoltaj■ Fungal meningitis

Page 60: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Acknowledgments● Funding

○ National Coordinating Center for Public Health Services and Systems Research■ University of Kentucky■ Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

● IASSH○ Conference organizers○ Attendees

Page 61: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Thank you