Transcript
Page 1: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Epidemiological Modeling and Economic Evaluation for Prioritization of

Limited Public Health Resources

Kaja Abbas, PhD, MPHAssistant Professor of Infectious Diseases in Public Health

One-Health Public Health Program @ Virginia TechDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Virginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine

Department of Basic Sciences, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine

Page 2: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Epidemiological Modeling and Economic Evaluation for Prioritization of

Limited Public Health Resources:Infectious Disease Perspective

Kaja Abbas, PhD, MPHNarges Dorratoltaj, MS

Jennifer SamuelsKarina Platt, MPH

Paige Bordwine, MPHMargarat O’Dell, MD, MFA

Thomas Kerkering, MDKerry Redican, PhD, MSPH, MPH

Page 3: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Objective● To conduct cost-effectiveness analysis of

infectious disease interventions and assist in prioritization of limited public health resources.

● New River Valley, Virginia, USA○ Infectious disease outbreaks

■ Pertussis■ Tuberculosis■ Fungal meningitis

Page 4: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

New River ValleyNew River Health District

Page 5: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Pertussis2011 outbreak

Page 6: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Pertussis● Bacteria

○ bordetella pertussis

● Symptoms○ whooping cough○ fever

● Transmission○ air-borne

CDC

Page 7: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Pertussis infection timeline

Page 8: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

● DTaP vaccine○ Diptheria○ Tetanus○ Pertussis

Vaccine

Page 9: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Vaccines

Page 10: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Basic reproduction rate - Ro

● Ro○ Average number of

secondary cases caused by the primary case in a susceptible population

● Epidemic○ Ro > 1

● Endemic○ Ro = 1

● Elimination○ Ro < 1

● Eradication○ Ro = 0

Effective reproductive rate R ~ Ro * (1 - interventions impact)

Page 11: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

R and vaccination● Elimination

○ R < 1

f = fraction of population that are vaccinated(1 - f) = fraction of susceptible population

● For herd immunity○ minimum fraction/threshold (fh) of

population to be vaccinated■ R = Ro (1 - fh) < 1■ fh > 1 - (1 / Ro) ● Pertussis

○ Herd immunity ~ (92-94)%

Page 12: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

DTaP vaccine

Page 13: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Pertussis incidence - Virginia

Page 14: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

● 72 cases

● Prime impact○ private school

■ vaccination rate ~ 0%

Pertussis outbreak (2011)New River Valley

Page 15: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

● Vaccination & health education campaigns

● Vaccine clinics○ school○ community

New River Health DistrictIntervention

Page 16: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Economic evaluationICER - Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio

Page 17: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

● New River Health District○ employee hours○ number of vaccines○ clinical hours

● US Census Data○ average salary of various positions

● CDC ○ vaccine price list archive

■ cost of vaccines

Data sources (cost)

Page 18: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Intervention cost

Page 19: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

● DALY○ Disability Adjusted Life Year

● YLL○ Years of Life Lost due to premature death

● YLD (Years Lived with Disability)○ Years of Life Lost due to Disability

■ population: (prevalence) * (disability weight)● individual: (years with disability) * (disability weight)

● DALY = YLL + YLD

DALY, YLL, YLD

Page 20: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

DALY = YLL + YLD

Page 21: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

DALY = YLL + YLD

Page 22: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

LE = Average Life Expectancy = 78.7MR = Mortality rate of pertussis worldwide = .001 I = Number of Confirmed Cases = 72DW = Pertussis Disability Weight = .137

DALY = YLL + YLD

Page 23: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

DALY = YLL + YLD = 4.28 + 1.63= 5.91 DALYs

Cost of Intervention = $44,133.24Cost of no Intervention = $0

ICER = $44133.24 / 5.91 DALYs

ICER = $7,468 / DALY averted

ICERIncremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio

Page 24: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Cost-effectiveness thresholds

Page 25: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Decision criteria (WHO-CHOICE)

Page 26: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

● Comparator○ new intervention○ current intervention

● Costs● Effectiveness

○ direct protection○ indirect protection

● Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)

Cost-effectiveness analysis of infectious diseases’ interventions

● Perspective● Time horizon● Discounting● Uncertainty

○ sensitivity analysis■ deterministic■ probabilistic

● Modeling○ static

■ decision tree■ Markov model

○ dynamic

Page 27: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Tuberculosis2011 outbreak

Page 28: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Tuberculosis● Bacteria

○ Mycobacterium tuberculosis

● Symptoms○ respiratory problems

● Transmission○ air-borne

● Latent TB infection ○ ~ ⅓ global

■ asymptomatic■ non-infectious

● Active TB disease■ symptomatic■ infectious

Page 29: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Government Hospital of Thoracic MedicineChennai, India

Page 30: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

TB Sanatorium, Rochester NY

Page 31: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling
Page 32: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling
Page 33: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Tuberculosis outbreak (2011)New River Valley

● New River Valley jail○ 1 case

■ 41 year old■ 6 month history of TB symptoms■ HIV+

○ admitted to hospital■ TB and HIV drug treatment■ isolation

Page 34: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

● Inmate population○ week day

■ 880○ weekend

■ 930-940

● New inmates○ ~ (50-60) / week

● Employees○ ~ 200

New River Valley Regional Jail

Page 35: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

LTBI treatment - 3HP● 3 month treatment

○ once a week■ isoniazid■ rifapentine

● DOT○ directly observed therapy

Page 36: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

● 35 inmates○ PPT+○ chest x-ray -○ HIV -

● 28 inmates○ 3HP treatment○ 17 completed

LTBI treatment● 21 staff

○ PPT+○ chest x-ray -○ HIV -

● 10 staff○ 3HP treatment

Page 37: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

SEIS (Susceptibles-Exposed-Infectious-Susceptibles)tuberculosis

Page 38: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

SEIStuberculosis

Page 39: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

TB transmission dynamics

Page 40: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

SEIS epidemiological model(Susceptibles-Exposed-Infectious-Susceptibles)

Page 41: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Scenario simulations● Base-case scenario

○ No TB pre-screening● Intervention scenario

○ TB pre-screening

Page 42: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

ICER = - $15,461 / DALY averted (cost saving)

ICERIncremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio

Page 43: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Fungal Meningitis2012 outbreak

Page 44: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Fungal meningitis● Fungus

● Symptoms○ headache○ stiff neck○ fatigue

● Transmission○ non-contagious

● New England compounding center○ contaminated lots of

methylprednisolone acetate ■ used in epidural

spinal injections

Page 45: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Fungal meningitis outbreak● Health facilities

○ 23 states■ received

contaminated lots

○ 20 states■ 751 cases■ 64 deaths

● Virginia○ 54 cases○ 5 deaths

Page 46: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Fungal meningitis outbreak (2012)New River Valley

94 exposed residents

Kate Corvese, 2012

Page 47: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Surveillance process

Page 48: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Time & costs

Page 49: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

ICERIncremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio

DALY = 73.5 DALYs avertedCost of Intervention = $30,492

ICER = $415 / DALY averted

Page 50: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

PertussisTuberculosis

Fungal Meningitis

Comparative analysis of different interventions

Uniform metric: ICER = $/DALY averted

Page 51: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Prioritization of limited public health resources

Intervention ICERTuberculosis -$15,461/DALY averted

(Cost saving)

Fungal meningitis $415 / DALY averted

Pertussis $7,468 / DALY averted

Page 52: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

● DCP3○ summarize and synthesize evidence of the

effectiveness of global health interventions and provide comparative economic evaluation of policies to implement those interventions■ http://www.dcp-3.org

Disease control priorities project

Page 53: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)

Page 54: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

● Research○ Modeling infectious

diseases■ Epidemiology■ Economics

○ Public Health Services & Systems Research■ Health services

● Organization● Financing● Delivery

Welcome collaborations!● Teaching

○ Infectious disease epidemiology

○ Modeling infectious diseases

[email protected]

Page 55: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Research, policy & practice

Page 56: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Public health challenges

Page 57: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Public health challenge focus● Individual health

○ treatment focused clinical care

● Population health○ prevention focused

community programs ■ multi-sectoral

● cooperation● coordination

Page 58: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Transdisciplinary collaborative solutions

Page 59: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Acknowledgements● Students

○ Karina Platt■ Pertussis

○ Jennifer Samuels■ Tuberculosis

○ Narges Dorratoltaj■ Fungal meningitis

Page 60: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Acknowledgments● Funding

○ National Coordinating Center for Public Health Services and Systems Research■ University of Kentucky■ Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

● IASSH○ Conference organizers○ Attendees

Page 61: Evaluation for Prioritization of Epidemiological Modeling

Thank you


Top Related