european atm master plan level 3 implementation · pdf filemaster plan level 3 planning and...

European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Planning and Reporting

Awareness Presentation

DPS/PEPREdition: 13th January 2017

Master Plan Level 3 Planning and Reporting –Presentation Objectives

European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Planning and Reporting – Awareness Training 2

This “Introduction to the Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Planning & Reporting”presentation provides a broad overview of the Single Sky Implementation planning andreporting mechanisms, at pan‐European and local levels.

It covers questions such as: What is the ATMMaster Plan Level 3 Implementation view? What is an Implementation Objective? What are the criteria set to determine implementation progress? Who are the Stakeholders and Users? What is the mechanism for Implementation Planning and Reporting? What are the Stakeholders’ Roles and EUROCONTROL ‘PEPR’ Unit mission?

Implementation Planning and Reporting: the Broad Picture

3

The Single European Sky needs concrete implementationplans for Europe as a whole, and these have to be basedon the European ATMMaster Plan.

Once a European plan has been agreed to, local andregional plans have to be drawn up. These will be used byAir Navigation Service Providers, Regulatory Authorities,the Military, Airports, Airspace Users, etc.

Individual Stakeholders then compile their ownimplementation progress reports. These are laterconsolidated on a European level so that the aviationcommunity can identify the gap between what is neededat the European level and what can actually be done atthe local and regional level to close that gap.

EUROCONTROL supports by: coordinating the contributions to the annual ATM

Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan; facilitating the production of implementation progress

reports (‘LSSIP’ documents) made by the nationalStakeholders;

producing consolidated reports on a European level,such as the ATM Master Plan (MP) Level 3Implementation Report, the CAPEX report forPerformance Review Body (PRB)/EC, the ICAOGANP/ASBU monitoring report for ICAO;

assisting decision‐making by various steering bodies onany remedial action needed to implement the plans.

European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Planning and Reporting – Awareness Training

Where it come from?


Single European Sky (SES) and SESAR framework require Stakeholders to agree at European level on implementation actions prior to local deployment.

EC Regulations are one of the channels to ensure harmonisation in the implementation, but over‐regulation would be inappropriate.

To complement SES legislation, Stakeholders recognise the imperative for progress on the SES implementation through Consensus decisions Synchronised actions

As a result, Stakeholders requested the EUROCONTROL Agency in 2007 to adapt the ECIP/LCIP process to match SES and SESAR environments, and over a 2‐year consultation process with Stakeholders, the Planning and Reporting (known as ESSIP/LSSIP) mechanism emerged as the answer.

The aim is to facilitate the achievement of endorsed implementation actions by all concerned ATM Stakeholders as a major contribution to reach the expected benefits of SES and SESAR in particular against agreed performance targets

4

The European ATM Master Plan

5European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Planning and Reporting – Awareness Training

Within the framework of the Single European Sky (SES), the European Air Traffic Management Master Plan (hereafter referred to as ‘the Master Plan’) is the main planning tool for defining ATM modernisation priorities and ensuring that the SESAR (Single European Sky ATM Research) Target Concept becomes a reality.



The Master Plan is an evolving roadmap and the result of strong collaboration between all ATM Stakeholders.As the technological pillar of the SES initiative, SESAR contributes to achieving the SES High‐Level Goals and supports the SES regulatory framework.



The Master Plan details not only a high‐level view of what is needed to be done in order to deliver a high‐performing ATM system, but also explains why and by when. It therefore sets the framework for the development activities performed by the SESAR Joint Undertaking (SJU) in the perspective also of the deployment activities to be performed by all operational Stakeholders, and under the coordination of the SESAR Deployment Manager (SDM) for the regulated Pilot Common Projects (PCP) in accordance with the Deployment Programme to ensure overall consistency and alignment.

The European ATM Master Plan – Highlights

8

Click on the link to access European ATM Portal: https://www.eatmportal.eu/working/

Updated in 2015

Under the governance of SJU, with a dedicated Project for its Maintenance, and led by EUROCONTROL

(Next update planned end 2019)




The content of the Master Plan is structured in three levels to allow Stakeholders to access an integrated set of information at the appropriate level of detail: Level 1 (for Executive level Stakeholders) constituting the synthesis consisting of the SESAR Vision, the Performance View, the Operational View, the Deployment View, the Business View and the Risk Management.

Levels 2 and 3 of the Master Plan provide more detail on the operational changes and related elements and therefore the target audience is expert‐level Stakeholders. Level 2 (Planning and Architecture View) is available through the European ATM portal (www.atmmasterplan.eu), which provides the detailed planning and architecture information supporting Level 1.

Level 3 (Implementation View) comprises the Implementation Plan and Report. The Implementation Plan is a set of commonly‐agreed implementation objectives and actions, including those resulting from the other SES plans such as the SESAR Deployment Programme, which aim at achieving the performance targets in the areas of safety, environment, capacity and cost efficiency. The Implementation Report provides a progress assessment for all implementation objectives at ECAC level.

In addition, the Level 3 of the Master Plan provides Stakeholders with a basis for short‐term common implementation planning.

The Master Plan Level 3 Implementation view


The European ATM Master Plan Level 3 (MP L3) Implementation view consists of two closely related parts – Plan and Report – and is complemented by States Local Single Sky Implementation (LSSIP).

The Implementation Plan is a performance‐oriented process that describes the common implementation actions required to improve the European ATM network over the next five to seven years. It does this in the form of Implementation Objectives and Stakeholder Lines of Action which define what has to be done, why, how, when, where and by whom.

The Implementation Report consolidates of the local implementation plans and annual progress reports, provides an overview of implementation and identifies the delays in implementation at European level.

This overview helps to focus the analysis on the most critical implementation delays and to prepare for appropriate remedial actions, thus closing the loop between implementation monitoring and implementation planning.

The MP L3 Implementation view: Plan and Report

11

MP L3 Plan

LSSIP documents(41 States+

MUAC)

MP L3 Report

Level 3 of the Master Plan = [MP L3 Plan + MP L3 Report]

Only mature and essentialATM Solutions, for which there is a

need of a European monitoring

Few Network Strategy Plan elements

Implementing Rules prerequisite

to deployment



12

MP L3 Plan


From the ATM Master Plan, implementation actions are derived, which in turn are the main drivers for the SES Implementation

The Implementation Plan is based on and covers the ATM MP (including the SDM’s Deployment ProgrammeATM functionalities) and where needed some elements of the Network Strategy Plan, SES Interoperability regulations (8.33, Datalink Service,..).

It is under the governance of SJU (with a dedicated Project for its maintenance and through the Master Planning Committee), and EUROCONTROL Provisional Council


13

MP L3 Plan


MUAC)


The Local Single Sky Implementation (LSSIP) provides a ”Reality check” on the MP L3 Plan, as reported by National Stakeholders, who sign and commit to the report documents.For each ECAC State (+ MUAC), the LSSIP delivers one document containing the local implementation plan and progress report.The LSSIP reports present the review of the situation at the end of the calendar year, the evolution over the past year, and the plans for next years until achievement of each individual Implementation Objective.

LSSIP process is also extended to the whole ICAO EUR region: directly used for ECAC States with questionnaire for other

ICAO EUR States


14

MP L3 Plan


MUAC)

MP L3 Report


The MP L3 Implementation Report is the official Master Plan reporting deliverable that gives an overview of progress for all implementation objectives represented in the MP L3 Implementation Plan.

The MP L3 Plan Document


The MP L3 Implementation Plan is updated every year.

The edition 2016 is driven by two main objectives: toupdate and secure the planning of the deployment of theSESAR baseline and to ensure a complete coverage of theATM functionalities covered by the PCP.

The plan is enriched with the outcome of the monitoringand reporting activities linked to the execution of theprevious editions of MP and of the Implementation Report.

It shows the deployment of SESAR prerequisites progress,and also the progress in PCP delivery until the targetcompletion date.

In order to ensure coherence in the management of thedeployment of the components of the PCP, the documenthas been developed in cooperation with the SESARDeployment Manager (SDM), integrating ImplementationObjectives to ensure the adequate coverage of the PCPrequirements in relation with SDM’s DeploymentProgramme families.

The MP L3 Plan Document


The Implementation Plan 2016 proposes an enhanced structure based on three views for improved readability by decision makers:

The Strategic view presents the main operational changes according to the four SESAR Key Features as defined in the Master Plan Level 1 and gives an overview of what is in the pipeline for deployment.

The Deployment view gives a more detailed description of each Implementation Objective, and refers to the “What” “When”, “Who”, “Where”. It includes the link with Level 2 of the Master Plan, with the SDM Deployment Programme 2016 and with the ICAO Aviation Systems Block Upgrades (ASBUs) as well as the benefits expected and the status of implementation at European level.

A third view, the Engineering view, which is available on‐line only, provides a complete description of each Implementation Objective with details of the Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) and reference to the necessary supporting material.

MP L3 Plan Document – Highlights

17

Click here to access

Plans for next 5‐7 years

Official deliverable of SJU and EUROCONTROL

MP L3 Plan includes:Implementation Objectives Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs)

For the year 2016 cycle, there are 44 Implementation Objectives of which: 33 related to SESAR DP 33 related to ICAO GANP (not the

same as the DP ones)


The 4 ATM Key Features

The deployment view is organised per ATM Key Feature and provides an overview of the operational changes and the associated Implementation Objectives.


What is an Implementation Objective lifecycle?


The European ATM Master Plan serves as source, and the Implementation Objective selection and approval process as procedure for objectives to advance.

First Stakeholders, in collaboration with SESAR partners, select topics that are mature enough for the current or next cycle.

Stakeholders then prioritise the topics, to allow them to start working on outline descriptions for the most relevant ones.

Having outline descriptions available allows Stakeholders to make a final maturity approval decision, which results in outline descriptions being converted to draft objectives.

Finally, Stakeholders will commit to those draft objectives that then get included in that cycle’s Implementation Plan by endorsing it at the appropriate bodies.

What is an Implementation Objective lifecycle?


Eventually, the Stakeholders can also decide that the objective has been met, in which case its status is set to “Achieved”.

Achieved objectives can still be monitored via the LSSIP process in order to ensure the maintenance of quality in the information collected and to support the monitoring of ICAO ASBUs implementation.

Implementation Objectives – Some Examples


…

Implementation Objective Attributes

Each Implementation Objective is described in a more detailed deployment view answering: What: providing a brief description of

the improvement to be implemented; Why: detailing the performance benefits

brought by the Objective; Who: listing the ATM Stakeholders

involved in its implementation; When: presenting agreed timelines; Where: setting the geographical scope

for implementation; How: breaking down the actions to be

taken by each stakeholder.


Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) – Examples


24

Click here to access LSSIP Documents


Planning and Reporting Tool

For all National Stakeholders

Annual documents, based on MP L3 Plan = fact finding on real progress and plans

42 Documents (one per each continental ECAC state + MUAC)

Level 1 – High Level View on the National ATM situation (Public part)Level 2 – Details on progress and plans of all Implementation Objectives

(Restricted part)

LSSIP Documents

An SLoA shall be reported “Late” in the case when there is a firm commitment to implement the SLoA (e.g. budget and schedule approved) but foreseen to be achieved after the SLoA finish date

Implementation Progress Determination

Planned

Not Applicable

Completed

No plan yet ‐> Feasibility phase, no budget allocated, risk identification, etc.

A planned schedule and proper (approved and committed budgeted) actions are specified within the SLoA finish date for completion

Implementation has kicked off, but is not yet fully completed and the planned implementation date is within the SLoA finish date.

Function in operational use.

Planned date ≤ Deadline

On going

0%

1‐99%

xx%

100%

Planned date > Deadline


Late 0‐99%

No Plan

Objective is not relevant for the State -

25

LSSIP Tools: Database


There are 300+ users of the Database

An Electronic Database is used to access and report on Implementation Progress

LSSIP Tools: SharePoint


LSSIP working documents and supporting information can be easily exchanged

LSSIP Tools: Map View


LSSIP Maps, Evolution charts & Progress reports are available on the EATM Portal: https://www.atmmasterplan.eu/depl/essip_objectives/monitoring

Map views and Evolution charts facilitates the presentation of overall implementation progress

LSSIP Documents

29

The Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) documents are the expression of the commitment of civil and military National Organisations (Regulators and National Supervisory Authorities), Service Providers and Airport Operators, towards the implementation of the European ATM Master Plan.

They provide a comprehensive view, for the benefit of the ATM community at large, of how ECAC States and concerned Stakeholders are progressing in planning and deploying the mature elements of the ATM Master Plan, as identified as Implementation Objectives in its Level 3. They constitute a short/medium term implementation plan containing ECAC States’ actions to achieve these and to improve the performance of their national ATM System.

The MP L3/LSSIP is a well‐established and mature mechanism, with a long history dating back more than 20 years ago, named Convergence & Implementation Program (CIP).

The LSSIP document – Year 20xx describes the situation in the State at the end of December 20xx.


LSSIP Documents

enter your presentation title 30

The LSSIP documents (Level 1) are structured into 6 chapters:

Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State. In addition, an overview of the Airspace Organization and Classification, the ATC Units, the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP are also provided in this chapter;

Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State;

Chapter 3 provides a set of recommendations extracted from the MP L3 Report which are relevant to the state/Stakeholders concerned. The state reports how they have handled those recommendations and the actions taken during the year to address the concerns expressed by those recommendations;

Chapter 4 provides a set of the main ATM national projects which contribute directly to the implementation of the ATM MP related Objectives. The description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas are provided by the states per each project;

Chapter 5 deals with the ATM Regional Coordination. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation and Projects and also all other regional initiatives and Projects which are out of the FAB scope.

Chapter 6 contains high‐level information on progress and plans of each Implementation Objective.


31

ECAC‐wide implementation Progress Assessment

MP L3 Report is based mainly on LSSIP data but also on other sources (PRISME, NM, Stakeholders)

Provides different views of implementation (Strategic, Deployment, FAB, State centric View)

Fully driven by SESAR Key Features and aligned to MP Levels 1 & 2

Under the aegis of SESAR – more than 30 contributors from ATM industry


The MP L3 Report



The MP L3 Report

The MP L3 Report provides a holistic view of the implementation of commonly agreed actions to be taken by ECAC States, in the context of the implementation of SESAR.


The MP L3 Report

The MP L3 Report is produced annually, developed in close cooperation with the SJU and SESAR partners. The layout and structure of the document are driven by the SESAR key features, to better reflect the alignment between all three MP levels.

The layout and structure of the document are driven by the SESAR key features, to better reflect the alignment between all three MP levels.


The MP L3 Report

The MP L3 2015 Implementation Report (latest edition) is based on the MP L3 Implementation Plan that included 41 implementation objectives. Most of the implementation objectives are directly related to SESAR functionalities, including the PCP components. In addition, some implementation objectives are PRE‐SESAR objectives that are important for implementation at network level or interoperability‐related objectives. There are also a few implementation objectives related to Single European Sky legislation.

35

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:‐ Conclusions

STRATEGIC VIEW:‐ Middle

management‐ Major ATM

Changes‐ Success Stories‐ Expected

evolution in year ahead

FAB VIEW:‐ Per KF‐ Performance‐ Part of

Strategic View

DEPLOYMENT VIEW:‐ Expert level‐ New layout‐ More Statistic‐ KF driven‐ New progress

STATE VIEW:‐ State rep.‐ Per KF‐ Not printed ‐ Statistic plus

PCP‐ One page


The MP L3 Report Structure

The MP L3 Report Deployment View – Objective Progress Reports


The progress status for each Objective comes from the MP L3 2015 Report and is described in the following terms:

The Objective Implementation Progress View -Examples


Applicability area – As defined in the ESSIP Plan Edition 2015.

SESAR Key Feature – shows the SESAR Key Feature under which implementation objective belongs.

PCP sub‐functionality – shows the functional relationship between implementation objective and PCP sub‐functionality. This link does not mean that ESSIP objective fully covers the PCP functionality (e.g. it can be part of the functionality, enabler or pre‐requisite). Therefore the overall progress of the objective cannot be in any way taken as a progress of PCP sub‐functionality.

ICAO ASBU – shows the link between implementation objective and ICAO ASBU.

OI steps – shows the link between Operational Improvement steps and implementation objectives

CAPEX – shows the link between State CAPEX as reported in the RP2 Performance Plans and implementation objectives.

Completion Rate evolution – shows past (if applicable) and future evolution of the implementation objective completion rate.

Main 2015 developments – summarises the main developments in objective implementation based on the reported LSSIP information and expert judgement/analysis. In some cases this information is complemented by the information from Network Manager and Prisme Fleet database for aircraft equipment information.

Map – highlight the progress of implementation at State or Stakeholder level (as relevant) and reflect the progress reported through LSSIP 2015.

EUROCONTROL and ICAO EUR/NAT Working Together


LSSIP reporting mechanism already existing in the European region is also used to preparereport for ICAO HQ on ASBU implementation

For ECAC States no double reporting to comply with ICAO monitoring requirements ‐ all infoextracted from ESSIP/LSSIP process

For non‐ECAC States reporting burden limited to a minimum with specific guidanceprovided by EUROCONTROL


EUROCONTROL and ICAO EUR/NAT Working Together


The 2016 edition report on ASBUimplementation in ICAO EUR Region covers 41States, plus 3 States where the information isincluded in another State’s implementationprogress information, that are part of theESSIP/LSSIP mechanism and 8 States within theICAO EUR Region that reported their statusand plans using a dedicated questionnaire aspart of their regular State Reports for the AirTraffic Management Group – Eastern part ofthe ICAO EUR Region (ATMGE) meetings.

The report is developed by EUROCONTROL incooperation with ICAO EUR/NAT Office.It is presented on an annual basis to theEANPG for endorsement, then submitted forinclusion into the annual ICAO Global AirNavigation Report, so that the regionaldevelopments/deployment actions can becoordinated across the regions and globalinteroperability can be ensured at the highestlevel.

Examples of Implementation Progress View -Maps and Planning Status


ASBU Block 0 Implementation Dashboard & Module Implementation Outlook

41

As part of the Conclusions andRecommendations, the information presentedin the planning views and implementationprogress are summarized by two tables, aimedat giving an overall and straightforwardunderstanding of the ASBUs Implementationstatus so far.

The first table, called “ASBU Block 0Implementation Dashboard”, presents thenumber of States that have achievedimplementation and gives the overall rate of“Completion” status by the end of 2015. It canbe used to compare, in a simple way, theprogress achieved in different ICAO Regions.

The second table, called “ASBU Block 0Modules Implementation Outlook for 2018”,presents the “Completion” status (number ofStates and rates) foreseen to be achieved bythe end of 2018, in accordance with theplanning dates reported by States in the ICAOEUR Region.


LSSIP Database: Current Users / Use


At Global level

At EU level

At local level

Institutions Purpose

ANSPs, Airspace Users, Airport Operators, Military Authorities

For development of business plans, for monitoring the progress, for synchronisedregional/ Functional airspace Blocks (FAB) development

State Aviation Departments, Aviation Authorities; Military Authorities

For monitoring, oversight purposes

Institutions Purpose

ICAO EUR office GANP/ASBU monitoring

Bodies/organisations Purpose

SJU For the ECAC states monitoring purposes

To provide a holistic roll‐out plan for the SESAR seen as a whole and to ensure alignment of other implementation/programme plans (such as the SESAR Deployment Programme or the NextGen implementation Plan) with the Master Plan

SDM To ensure the appropriate link between the Deployment Programme and the Master Plan, especially PCP elements.

Performance Review Body (PRB) To support the assessment of CAPEX

European Defence Agency (EDA) EDA in cooperation with NATO and EUROCONTROL military unit uses LSSIP reports to collect information on military systems and infrastructure to support the military input to the Master Plan, and to support the operational and financial impact analysis of its implementation for the military community.

EUROCONTROL/NM


MP L3 Plan

MP L3 Report

LSSIP infoNSP

DP

EU Regulations

ATM Master Plan

NSP – Network Strategy Plan

PCPSDM – SESAR Deployment Manager

Centralised Services

ICAO GANP/ASBU

GANP/SBU – Global Air Navigation Plan / Aviation System Blocks Upgrades

CAPEX report

PRB

DP – Deployment Programme

SDM

PCP – Pilot Common Project

ICAO Report

Projects

Monitoring and Reports

LSSIP Documents

Full MP L3 & LSSIP Mechanism

A Collaborative Context

44

The context is continuously in evolution !


Collaborative work and partnership with ICAO EUR Office to monitor and report on ASBUs Implementation in the EUR region

Support to PRB work on CAPEX (CAPital EXPenditure)

Continuous work and cooperation with SJU and EC

Analysis of SESAR Solutions new Objectives in MP L3 Plan

Monitoring and reporting SES Implementation

Ready to play role in SESAR Deployment Governance ‐ Policy Level

Aligned with SDM’s Deployment Programme

Stakeholders Roles – States


Furthermore, EUROCONTROL Member States are under the obligation to:

Report on the progress of the implementation of the MP L3 Plan;

Report to ICAO‐EUR on the progress towards the implementation of the ICAOGlobal Air Navigation Plan (GANP) Aviation System Block Upgrades (ASBUs).

This is done through the LSSIP process and related National LSSIP documents.

STATE RESPONSIBILITIES IN MONITORING ATM DEPLOYMENT

NSAs while representing the States have multiple responsibilities that are inrelation to the implementation of appropriate functionalities while building andfurther developing the European ATM system.These include : Ensure oversight of changes; Draw up of performance plans, performance oversight and monitoring of

implementation of performance plans and targets achieving processes; Ensure support to EC as described in Commission Regulation 409/2013 for

the setting up of the SESAR Deployment (SD) Governance; Ensure coordination with the SDM as described in Commission Regulation

409/2013 for the setting up of the SD Governance; Monitor investments in ATM, including activities related to Common Projects.

Stakeholders Roles – LSSIP National Focal Points


The LSSIP National Focal Point (further – LSSIP FP) is the person responsible for ensuring correct and consistent LSSIP data by respecting the agreed time scheduled.The LSSIP FP is a nominated person by the State, through official designation. In the light of this, it is State responsibility to nominate the LSSIP FP among the staff of the National Regulatory Authority, NSA, or ANSP. The LSSIP FP is responsible for the coordination of all national Stakeholders during the production of the LSSIP of the State he/she represents. The formal job description of the LSSIP FP and his interactions with the various Stakeholders (stakeholder FPs and experts) remains a matter for the respective State/ Stakeholders to agree.

Main ResponsibilitiesAs from the LSSIP kick off meeting: Co‐ordination with all National Stakeholders to update the information in the LSSIP

database; Ensure consistency of information between ‘project modules’ and national business

plan; Whenever possible, ensure consistency of information between LSSIP database and

other databases on the same topics;

Interaction with Other Roles‐ CP from EUROCONTROL;‐ National Stakeholders (Stakeholder’s FP, nominated experts, etc);

The LSSIP Expert Group is established to further enhance the involvement of LSSIP Focal Points / Experts in the development of elements of the LSSIP, e.g. operational matters, process, guidance material, tools, way of working (including collection of and sharing the best practices, lessons learnt, etc.).

Planning/Reporting cycle – Example for Year 2015


Planning/Reporting cycles – Years to come


The process also includes: yearly satisfaction survey, lessons learned to improve process, quality of information, data usability and accessibility, and cross‐feeding with/to other sources

48

A full planning & reporting cycle takes two years. This means that at any time there at 2 cycles in progress:The diagram below shows where we are near the end of year 2016, and what cycles are operational:

EUROCONTROL ‘PEPR’ Unit Support


PEPR = PANEUROPEANPLANNINGMonitoring &REPORTING

PEPR Unit is part of Directorate Pan‐European Single Sky (DPS)

49

Assist Stakeholders in their duties relatedto SES/SESAR Deployment Planning andReporting, and the European Commission asrequested, in a cost effective manner

Stakeholders Roles – LSSIP Contact Person (EUROCONTROL)


The LSSIP Contact Person (further CP) supports the MP L3 implementation cycle (preparation, execution, maintenance) by mediating between EUROCONTROL Agency (the Agency) and State to maintain on timely, precise information and format producing LSSIP.

The CP provides the necessary support and guidance to his/her State(s) for the production/updating of the LSSIP and related activities. The CP works in support of the LSSIP National Focal Point (further – LSSIP FP), who is responsible for providing consistent and complete LSSIP information.

Furthermore, the CP may also interact with other relevant State Stakeholders and experts, providing support and guidance as needed/requested and in line with the agreed working arrangements with that State.

51

PEPR ActivitiesApplying the PDCA cycle


Assist appropriate steering bodies on possible remedial actions where

relevant

Produce the European ATM Implementation

Plan

SupportStakeholders’

production of Local +Regional

implementation plans + progress

reports

Produce European implementation

progress reports as needed by the EC

and ATM community

Some Frequently Asked Questions

enter your presentation title 52

How is the LSSIP information used? The information provided in the LSSIP documents is primarily used to produce the yearly Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report which gives a global picture of the progress of Implementation Objectives at Pan European Level. Yet there are many other users / usages of the LSSIP information

How can I know more about the methodology used by the States/Stakeholders for the determination of the Implementation Objectives Progress? You can consult the methodology used on our LSSIP dedicated webpage. Click here

How is the progress of the Implementation Objectives monitored and reported by the States/Stakeholders through the LSSIP process? The States/Stakeholders provide a concise and comprehensive statement of their progress per each Implementation Objective against the Objective description, finalisation criteria, and overall European planning, through the Web‐based interface of the LSSIP Database. This information is initially challenged by the Agency Contact Person (in DPS/PEPR), and further during an in‐cycle check (January) by the Agency Objective Coordinators (in DPS/PEPR) and Owners (all through the Agency), so to ensure that the reported information is factually correct and up to date.

Useful Links

European ATM Master Plan Web‐portalwww.eatmportal.eu(www.atmmasterplan.eu)

PEPR Teamwww.eurocontrol.int/articles/pepr‐team

All MP L3/LSSIP informationwww.eurocontrol.int/pepr


Summary

We have presented the following items : The European ATM Master Plan The background for Implementation planning and reporting The MP Level 3 Implementation process: Plan, LSSIP Documents and Report The 4 ATM Key Features The Implementation Objective Lifecycle Examples of Objectives & SLoAs The Local Single Sky Implementation (LSSIP)

Progress Criteria, Tools, Documents Planning and Reporting full Mechanism Links with ICAO GANP/ ASBU monitoring Users and Use Stakeholders’ roles Agency Support / PEPR unit Useful links FAQ


You can also learn more by visiting the EUROCONTROL PEPR website

Thank you for your attention!