ets: examining the demographics, education, skills and ... · •the college board goal ›by 2025,...
TRANSCRIPT
1
ETS: Examining the
Demographics,
Education, Skills and
Workforce Readiness of
Adults
March 3, 2010
2
President Obama
Lumina Foundation
Others
Gates Foundation
Convergence of Goals
3
Convergence of Goals• Gates Foundation Goal
› Double number of low-income adults who earn a college degree by age 26
• Lumina Foundation Goal› By 2025, increase to 60% Americans with “high quality” degrees
and credentials
• The College Board Goal› By 2025, increase to 55% young Americans who complete school
with a community college degree or higher
• National Governors Association and Council of Chief State School Officers› Developing Common Core Standards for K-12 to align skills and
knowledge of graduating seniors with college readiness
4
New National Leadership
“…this country needs and values the talents of every American. That is why we will provide the support necessary for you to complete college and meet a new goal: by 2020, America will once again have the highest proportion of college graduates in the world.”
- President Barack Obama
5
Clear Social
Justice Issue
6
SOCIAL JUSTICE
National
Personal
7
4.2%
6.4%
8.3%
9.6%
15.1%
Less Than High
School
High School Some College/No
Degree
Associate Bachelor's Degree
or higher
2009 Unemployment Rate by Education (age 25 and older)
8
2008 Median Annual Earnings by Education (age 25 and older)
$22,200
$30,732
$38,272
$50,856
$63,856
$79,144 $80,860
Less Than
High School
High School Associate Bachelor's
Degree
Masters Professional Doctorate
9
Degree Attainment by SAT Scores
and Socioeconomic Status
10
College Participation by
Socioeconomic Status
LOWEST HIGHEST
HIGHEST 78% 97%
LOWEST 36% 77%
SES QUARTILE
College Participation by Achievement Test
and Socioeconomic Status Quartile
ACHIEVEMENT
QUARTILE
11
63% of all jobs will require some
post-secondary education, 2018
Labor force
in 2018,
154 Million
High
School
Dropout
10%
Associate’s
Degree 12%
Graduate
Degree
10%
Some College
15%
Bachelor’s Degree
23%High
School
Graduate
27%
Source: March CPS data, Center on Education and
the Workforce forecasts of education demand to
2018
12
Key challenge for
postsecondary education -
defining “adults” and
identifying characteristics
13
National Center for Education Statistics -
Selected Characteristics of Independent and
Dependent Students 1999-2000
Independent Dependent
Work 35 or more per week 58% 22%
Delayed enrollment 67% 24%
No high school diploma 12% 3%
Attend part-time 80% 42%
Have Children 53% 0%
Single parent 24% 0%
White 64% 71%
Black 15% 9%
First generation college 50% 27%
Women 59% 53%
NCES; Wei et al, 2005 Table 2a
14
Non-Traditional Students
Grouped by NCES
• Minimally nontraditional
› One characteristic
• Moderately nontraditional
› Two or three characteristics
• Highly nontraditional
› Four or more characteristics
Majority of all undergraduates are
at least minimally nontraditional
15
“In 2006, if all students who were
either older than 24 or were enrolled
part-time are considered
“nontraditional,” more than half of all
undergraduates fell into this
category.”
Lucie Lapovsky, Rethinking Student Aid: Nontraditional Students, 2009
IMPLICATIONS
16
Low graduation rates for students who enter college
with one or more of the nontraditional characteristics prove that access to higher
education is not a guarantee of success.
Lucie Lapovsky, Rethinking Student Aid: Nontraditional Students, 2009
ACCESS IS NOT SUFFICIENT
17
For these students,
financial resources
are key.
18
Meeting the Challenge
• Fund differently
› Program of universal accounts
› Lifelong learning accounts
› Provide funds that can be used for education
or other major investment
Lucie Lapovsky, Rethinking Student Aid: Nontraditional Students, 2009
19
Good Financial Aid Policies
• Should make it possible for older
adults to participate in postsecondary
education
• Full-time basis
• Will not incentivize younger students
to hold off on attending college
Lucie Lapovsky, Rethinking Student Aid: Nontraditional Students, 2009
20
Employers also positively
impact enrollment of older
students by subsidizing
tuition costs (45% in 2004-2005)
Lucie Lapovsky, Rethinking Student Aid: Nontraditional Students, 2009
21
Pell Grants positively
impact enrollment of
older students
Lucie Lapovsky, Rethinking Student Aid: Nontraditional Students, 2009
22
Students who attend more than half
time are eligible to receive Pell
awards that include some living costs
– those who attend less than part-
time, are only able to receive a
percentage of tuition and fees and are
ineligible for Stafford Loans…
Lucie Lapovsky, Rethinking Student Aid: Nontraditional Students, 2009
23
Gates Millennium Scholars
*Source: OECD (2008).
• Scholarships provide flexibility
• More choice for students
• Worked fewer hours
• More likely to enter a four-year public or
private institution
• Lead to higher levels of engagement
24
Meeting the Challenge
•Getting educational opportunity information
to nontraditional students› Widely dispersed within the population
•KnowHow2Go Campaign› Multimedia campaign aimed at increasing college
enrollments of low-income and first generation students
› Lumina Foundation
› American Council on Education
› Ad Council
Lucie Lapovsky, Rethinking Student Aid: Nontraditional Students, 2009
25
What about adults
not in the
postsecondary
system?
26
Key Trends
*Source: OECD (2008).
America is the number one country in
educational attainment of older adults
(aged 55 to 64) but drops to 10th
for younger adults (aged 25 to 34)*
27
Today more than 36
million Americans lack a
high school credential
28
Every year 1.3 million
U.S. students drop out of
high school
29
10.5 million of these
Americans are ages
18 - 34
These adults are marginalized and denied
access to higher education and family-
supporting jobs
30
Degree Attainment and Population
Change (25 to 34)
Estimated increase in
population by 2020
15%
8%
23%
30%
Ethnicity
Asian
White
Black
Hispanic
* Those with the highest expected growth continue to face
significant socio-economic challenges and currently have
the lowest levels of degree attainment
Percentage with college
degrees, 2007
73%
47%
28%
20%
31
Optimistic Scenario
12.6%37%
37%
If 60% of U.S. citizens with “some
college” earn a degree
2007
20202020 Estimated Total:
49.6%
Percentage of Young Adults (25-34) with a College Degree
32
Optimistic Scenario: Estimated 2020
Degree Attainment (ages 25 to 34)
Even with a very optimistic 2020 U.S. estimate,
top OECD countries will lead the U.S. by 10.4 percent
51.4%No Degree
49.6%With Degree
U.S. Degree Attainment
60%With Degree
40%No Degree
Top OECD Degree Attainment
33
We are losing
ground every
day.
Bottom Line
34
We Can’t Get There From Here
- Unless -
We extend the pipeline and
provide access and more support
to individuals without high school
credentials
35
Where ACE fits
• A top strategic
priority
› GED Tests are central to
ACE’s mission and
commitment to access and
success in higher
education
› GED credential is a key
link between K-12,
postsecondary education,
and world of work
Higher Ed, other Postsecondary Ed,
Work Requirements
Varying K-12 Standards and
Graduation Requirements
GAP
College Prep. Cert. &
Credential
36
GED Today
• State and local issues limit space and
access
• Paper and pencil test limits reach
• Only 778,000 test takers and 493,000
credential recipients each year
A bolder approach is necessary
to address the nation’s critical needs
37
0
20
40
60
80
100%
Foreign-bornstatus dropouts
US-bornstatus dropouts
15M
Home-schooled
GED Target Adult Population
Potential GED candidate population
Homeschooled (~0.24M)-Includes homeschoolers between the ages of ~16-18 (equivalent of grades 11-12)
US-born adults without a high school diploma or equivalent (~10M)
-Includes adults between the ages of 18-44 who have not attained a high school or equivalent credential
Foreign-born adults without a high school diploma or equivalent (~5M)
-Includes immigrants between the ages of 18-44 who have not received a high school or equivalent credential, regardless of whether or not they were naturalized as citizens or participated in the US school system
38
GED Adult Target Population – Proficiency Levels
• We have reasonably good estimates of when dropouts
leave school and how far behind they are when they leave
• It appears that ~80% of GED candidate pool may currently have an academic
proficiency below 8th grade
0
20
40
60
80
100%
Percent of populationby grade level proficiency
Adults without HS diploma orequivalent credential
9-10th grade
6-8th grade
5th grade orless
11-12th grade
Less than 2% of the pool (11th to 12th grade) are close to the college-ready threshold
Another ~15% of the pool (9th to 10th grade) could reach college-readiness level by investing time and having access to current accelerated learning programs
The next 40% (6th to 8th grade) could reach college-readiness level by investing significant time and having access to current accelerated learning programs
For the remainder, achieving a 12th grade level of proficiency will be a more significant lift
39
GED 20/20 seeks to address the
proficiency gap
College- and Career-ready
proficiency level(target grade
level proficiency)
=
Time investment
for preparation(total prep
time)
X
Multiplier for accelerating proficiency (grade level
gain within total prep time)
Target proficiencyProjected proficiency
Starting proficiency level(current grade
level proficiency)
+
40
0
20
40
60
80
100%
Did not completehigh school
Basic
Belowbasic
Extremelybelowbasic
Percent of students byachievement level
Proficient &advanced
Alex11-12th grade
proficiency
Bobby9th-10th grade
proficiency
Chris6th-8th grade proficiency
Dani5th grade or
below proficiency
•Low (0-6 months of
preparation)
•Medium (6 months to
1.5 years of
preparation)
•High (1.5-3 years of
preparation)
•Highest (3-6 years of
preparation)
Academic proficiencyPreparation necessary to reach a 12th grade proficiency standard
41
0
20
40
60
80
100%
Did not completehigh school
Basic
Belowbasic
Extremelybelowbasic
Percent of students byachievement level
Proficient &advanced
Alex11-12th grade
proficiency
Bobby9th-10th grade
proficiency
Chris6th-8th grade proficiency
Dani5th grade or
below proficiency
• Self-directed instruction: Self-
preparation using workbooks or online
materials
• Blended instruction: Alternative
program with individually paced
curriculum, flexible schedule and
supplemental supports
• Classroom instruction: Classroom-
based model with flexible, intensive,
in-person, individualized instruction
with life skills support
• Basic adult education instruction:
Intensive, classroom-based adult
education courses as precursor to
GED prep described above
Academic proficiency Targeted accelerated program
42
Where we’re headed…ACTION PLAN AT ACE
• GED 20/20 is a comprehensive, multi-year
initiative designed to dramatically scale up the
numbers of individuals who earn the GED credential
• Three key components:
› Development of a college- and career-ready GED test aligned with the common core national standards
› Development of a system of multi-platform, broadly accessible academic preparation programs
› Connections and transition services to postsecondary education (PSE) and career opportunities
43
Pathways for adults to college/career-readiness, PSE success, and beyond
Attract LearnDemon-strate
Connect
Ongoing formative assessmen
t
Academically prepared
for PSE
Pathways to
instructional system
Attain
PSEattainmen
t and beyond
Pathways to PSE
Primary challenge
Differentiated instruction
Customized
curriculum
•Enroll in
PSE and
gain access
to family
supporting
careers
•Receive
information,
counseling,
or other
supports to
enroll in PSE
•Take
formative
assessment
to tailor
curriculum
and
instruction
•Access
broad array
of quality
instruction
tailored to
specific
needs
•Take
assessment
to diagnose
proficiency
•Reconnect to
programs that
provide
instructional
support to
achieve
proficiency
gains
•Take and
pass
GEDTS
20/20
exam
Diagnostic assessmen
t
•Receive
customized
curriculum
based on
current
proficiency
ACTION PLAN AT ACE
COORDINATED PATHWAYS
44
Required Pathways, Policies, and
Partnerships
• The identification of promising approaches to accelerated
learning and investment strategies capable of catalyzing their
further development
• The development of partnerships or convening of a coalition
of progressive members of the GED ecosystem
• The identification of learning / demonstration pilots, leveraging
new partnerships and existing public funding streams, to support
the accelerated learning strategy and serve as a platform for the
advocacy agenda
45
ADVOCACY AGENDA
• Access to public funding streams would enable
“instructional systems” to address the cost of
creating the “instructional system”
• The development of an advocacy agenda targeted at
federal / state policies that enable the future model (e.g.,
increasing eligibility of GED candidates to receive federal
and state funding for pathway programs)
46
ADVOCAY AGENDACredit for Prior Learning
• The CREDIT program will increase its
efforts to provide accelerated pathways
to postsecondary credentials for adult
learners through sound academic
evaluations of extra-institutional
learning.
47
ADVOCACY AGENDAFinancial Support for high School Dropouts
• Funds to offer programs
• Incentive for students
› Subsidy
› Funding for student computers
48
ADDITIONAL POLICY AND
RESEARCH IMPLICATIONS• Coordination of best practices for adult ed/GED
vs.Localized programming
• Reporting system based on learningvs.Reporting system based on seat-time
• The cost of new “instructional systems,” vs. The ability to pay for these costs
49
New National Leadership
“…this country needs and values the talents of every American. That is why we will provide the support necessary for you to complete college and meet a new goal: by 2020, America will once again have the highest proportion of college graduates in the world.”
- President Barack Obama
50
QUESTIONS