estimation of the accuracy obtained from cfd for industrial applications
DESCRIPTION
Estimation of the Accuracy Obtained from CFD for industrial applications. Prepared by Imama Zaidi. Sources of Uncertainty. Computational Grid Grid Spacing Grid Topology Numerical Approximation User Errors Post Processing Turbulence Modelling - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Estimation of the Accuracy Obtained from CFD for industrial
applications
Prepared by
Imama Zaidi
Sources of Uncertainty
• Computational Grid– Grid Spacing– Grid Topology
• Numerical Approximation• User Errors• Post Processing• Turbulence Modelling• Flow complexity (multi-phase flow, combustion…
etc)
Problem Definition
• Rayleigh Number
Ra=
• Reference Velocity
V0=
k
THCg P
32
THg
Part I
Laminar Flow
Flow inside Cavity
Types of Grids testedSquare grid
Polyhedral
SkewedButterfly type
_ . _h Control Vol N cells
Numerical Schemes tested
Convection schemes:
• Second Order Upwind• First Order Upwind• Central Differencing Scheme
Note: Runs are carried out in steady state mode
Richardson Extrapolation• Grid independent
solution
• Order of convergence
• Exact solution
• Targets: Nu
and Mass flow across ½ section =>
)ln(
)ln(
2
1
32
21
hhXXXX
n
1)(3
2
233
nt
hh
XXXX
Second Order UpwindSquare grid
First Order UpwindSquare grid
Central Differencing Scheme
n=2.33
Ra=103
Effect of Order of ConvergenceRich. Extrap. Using 102, 20, 40
Rich. Extrap. Using 202, 402, 802
Effect of Order of Convergence
n=1.72
n=1.96
Richardson Extrapolation at Hot Wall
Post Processing Error
20X2040X40
Example for user input Error
THgV 0Reference velocity is defined as:
Effect of Changing Reference Velocity
Effect of Numerical Scheme
Square Grid
Polyhedral Grid
Skewed Grid
Butterfly Type Grid
Why does error not always decrease?
• For square grid– Dx.Dt error > Dx2 ? But this is steady state– Residual normalisation? But increasing nb of
iteration => no change
• For skewed grid– Error = constant, whatever h.– Need to test other “gradient reconstruction”
methods for non-orthogonality
Part II
Turbulent Flow
Flow inside Cavity
Type of Mesh
Low Reynolds Number Model
• Standard Low Reynolds Number Model (Lein et all)
• Abe Nagano Kondoh (ANK)Low Reynolds Model (Abe et all)
• V2f Model(Durbin et all)• Model(Mentor)• Spalart Allamaras (SA) Model (Baldwin et all)
sstk
k
k
Y+ from 40*40 Grid
Y+ from 80*80 Grid
Y+ from 160*160 Grid
Error From Different Turbulence Models For Nu
Kω-sst model
Spalart Allmaras
V2f Model
K-sst Model
Near Wall Grid Dependence Kw-sst Model
Grid 80X80 and changing near-wall cell x
Near Wall Grid Dependence V2f Model
Conclusions
• For distorted grids (Skewed Mesh), the refinement does not guarantee the accuracy
• The higher the order of scheme is, the higher will be the accuracy.
• Richardson extrapolation theory tested for laminar flow, seems to be in good agreement with the results for order of convergence nearly equals to 2
Conclusions
• K SST model compared to the other models tested, seems more dependent on the grid refinement near the wall and grid independence is not reached even with 160x160 grid.