establishing the employment relationship: a legal perspective on important do’s and don’ts
DESCRIPTION
Establishing the Employment Relationship: A Legal Perspective on Important Do’s and Don’ts September 19, 2006 Robert M. Shea Morse, Barnes-Brown & Pendleton, P.C. Focus on trends/issues in three areas: Background Checks Offer Letters Non-Compete Agreements. Background Checks - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
(c) 2006 Morse, Barnes-Brown & Pendleton, P.C.
Establishing the Employment Relationship:
A Legal Perspective on Important Do’s and Don’ts
September 19, 2006
Robert M. SheaMorse, Barnes-Brown & Pendleton, P.C.
(c) 2006 Morse, Barnes-Brown & Pendleton, P.C.
Focus on trends/issues in three areas:
• Background Checks
• Offer Letters
• Non-Compete Agreements
(c) 2006 Morse, Barnes-Brown & Pendleton, P.C.
Background Checks• Percentage of employers conducting background checks
rising steadily
Survey of Boston-Area Businesses (by The Survey Group)
– Approximately 80% of employees have formal policies– Up 15% in two years
CORI requests have increased from 400,000 (annually) in 1998 to 1.5 million in 2004
Business of doing background checks is now a multi-billion dollar industry
(c) 2006 Morse, Barnes-Brown & Pendleton, P.C.
Why are background checks increasing?
• Bad hire decisions are costly
– Employee turnover– Recruitment costs– Wasted management time– Loss of productivity– Employee theft– Employment-related litigation
(c) 2006 Morse, Barnes-Brown & Pendleton, P.C.
• Claims by other employees– Harassment– Assault– “Negligent hire”
• Safety issues– Workplace violence– Terrorism
(c) 2006 Morse, Barnes-Brown & Pendleton, P.C.
What types of background checks are being conducted?
• Criminal background checks• Sex offender checks• Social Security traces• Driving record• Credit report• Employment verification
(c) 2006 Morse, Barnes-Brown & Pendleton, P.C.
What types of background checks are being conducted?
•Education verification•Business reference verification•Personal reference verification•License, credential and certification verification•Military record
(c) 2006 Morse, Barnes-Brown & Pendleton, P.C.
What are employers legal obligations?
• Anti-discrimination law – Don’t make inquiries, directly or indirectly, “the response to which would likely disclose the applicant’s protected class status”
• Protected classes – race, color, religious creed, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, age, ancestry, or disability
• MA Law also prohibits inquiries regarding workers’ compensation histories and certain types of criminal records
(c) 2006 Morse, Barnes-Brown & Pendleton, P.C.
Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”)
• Designed to ensure accuracy and protect privacy of consumer report information
• “Consumer report” – any communication containing information about a person’s personal or credit characteristics, character, reputation and/or lifestyle that is generated by a consumer reporting agency
• “Consumer reporting agency” – a business that assembles such reports for other businesses. Generally, any 3rd party that performs background checks for ERs is a consumer reporting agency
(c) 2006 Morse, Barnes-Brown & Pendleton, P.C.
FCRA Requirements
• Disclosure and consent
• Provide required documents prior to any adverse action
• Notice after adverse action
• Disposal of consumer report information
(c) 2006 Morse, Barnes-Brown & Pendleton, P.C.
FCRA only applies to consumer reports obtained from 3rd parties
• FCRA does not apply to background checks performed by “in-house” personnel
• Issue – use of internet search firms. Does FCRA apply?
(c) 2006 Morse, Barnes-Brown & Pendleton, P.C.
Criminal Offenders Record Information (“CORI”)
• CORI requests have risen dramatically
• CORI includes arrests and other non-conviction records starting at age 18
• Last year, in response to concern over broadened use of CORI, new rules impose “FCRA-like” obligations when using CORI
(c) 2006 Morse, Barnes-Brown & Pendleton, P.C.
New CORI Requirements
• Adopt a written CORI policy
• Notify applicant/employee that adverse action may be based on CORI report
• Provide copies of CORI report and employer’s policy to applicant/employee
• Provide a copy of CHSB’s informational summary to applicant/employee
• Provide an opportunity to challenge accuracy and relevance of CORI report
(c) 2006 Morse, Barnes-Brown & Pendleton, P.C.
Offer Letters
Why important?
• Establish expectations – nature/term of employment, position, duties and compensation.
– View as an enforceable contract
• Provide important protections to employers
(c) 2006 Morse, Barnes-Brown & Pendleton, P.C.
Elements of a good offer letter
• Definition of position and reporting structure
• Duty of loyalty / anti-moonlighting
• Compensation
• At-will statement
• Severance, if applicable
• Any requirements of non-compete, other restrictive covenants
(c) 2006 Morse, Barnes-Brown & Pendleton, P.C.
• Representation that employment does not conflict with current/prior employment
• Conditions– IRCA– Background check
• Entire understanding
• Expiration of offer
(c) 2006 Morse, Barnes-Brown & Pendleton, P.C.
Noncompetition Agreements
Enforceable?
Yes, when:
• Necessary to protect ER’s legitimate business interests
• Reasonable in time and scope
• Consistent with public interest
• Supported by consideration
(c) 2006 Morse, Barnes-Brown & Pendleton, P.C.
What business interests are protectable?
• ER’s relationships with customers (“good will”)
• Trade secrets and other confidential business information
ERs cannot prevent ordinary competition
(c) 2006 Morse, Barnes-Brown & Pendleton, P.C.
ERs should take a well-considered and consistent
approach
Ask: Will this EE control customer relationships and/or have access to confidential business information?
Will EE be in a position to harm ER’s business if leaves and use good will or confidential information?
Is non-compete necessary? Or would non-solicitation and/or nondisclosure restrictions be sufficient?
(c) 2006 Morse, Barnes-Brown & Pendleton, P.C.
Scope of restrictions must be reasonable
• Duration
• Geographical
(c) 2006 Morse, Barnes-Brown & Pendleton, P.C.
Issues
• Dilution / inconsistent enforcement
• Restriction imposed “post-hire”– Is continued employment adequate consideration?
• Effect of changes in position (e.g., promotion)
• Assignment
• Forum selection
• Attorneys’ fees
(c) 2006 Morse, Barnes-Brown & Pendleton, P.C.
Questions??