esc-2015 univ.-prof. dr. wilhelm haverkamp stellvertretender klinikdirektor charité -...
TRANSCRIPT
ESC-2015ESC-2015Univ.-Prof. Dr. Wilhelm Haverkamp
Stellvertretender Klinikdirektor
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Kardiologie
ALBATROSSALBATROSS
EPHESUSEPHESUS
EPHESUS, Therapiebeginn im Mittel 7 Tage nach Myokardinfarkt mit linksventrikulärer Dysfunktion (EF<40%) und Herzinsuffizienz Pitt et al., 2003
ALBATROSS StudyALBATROSS Study
• Aldosterone Lethal effects Blockade in Acute myocardial
infarction Treated with or without Reperfusion to
improve Outcome and Survival at Six months follow-up
ALBATROSS: DesignALBATROSS: Design
ALBATROSS: Primary endpointALBATROSS: Primary endpoint
ALBATROSS: DeathALBATROSS: Death
ALBATROSS: ConslusionsALBATROSS: Conslusions
CIRCUSCIRCUS
Does Does CCyclosporine yclosporine IImpmpRRove ove CClinical linical ooUUtcometcome
in in SST-elevation myocardial infarction T-elevation myocardial infarction patients ?patients ?
(the CIRCUS study)(the CIRCUS study)
• Michel OVIZE, MD, PhD Louis Pradel Hospital and
Claude Bernard University, Lyon, France
CIRCUS: DesignCIRCUS: Design
Secondary outcomes at 1 yearSecondary outcomes at 1 year
Cyclosporine(n=395)
Control(n=396)
Odds Ratio(95% CI)
P value
Death: all-cause 7.1 % 6.6 % 1.09[0.63 ; 1.90]
0.76
Death: cardiovascular
6.1 % 6.1 % 1.01[0.56 ; 1.81]
0.98
HF worsening or re-hospitalization for HF
22.8 % 22.7 % 1.01[0.72 ; 1.41]
0.97
Re-hospitalization for HF
10.6 % 10.4 % 1.03[0.65 ; 1.63]
0.65
ConclusionConclusion
• In anterior STEMI, cyclosporine did not reduce the risk of the composite primary outcome
– One out of four patients died or experienced heart failure despite receiving state-of-the-art medical care.
– Despite the results of CIRCUS, reperfusion injury is clinically important. The impact on clinical outcomes of recent encouraging phase II trials remains to be determined.
UNDER-ATPUNDER-ATPEAST-AFEAST-AF
PulmonalvenenisolationPulmonalvenenisolation
Verma et al, 2015
AF-Ablation: Persistierendes VHFAF-Ablation: Persistierendes VHF
Verma et al, 2015
UNmasking Dormant Electrical UNmasking Dormant Electrical ReconductionReconduction
by Adenosine TriPhosphateby Adenosine TriPhosphate
• Atsushi Kobori, Koichi Inoue, Kazuaki Kaitani, Yuko
Nakazawa, Toshiya Kurotobi, Itsuro Morishima,
Fumiharu Miura, Takeshi Morimoto, Takeshi Kimura,
and Satoshi Shizuta
BackgroundBackground
• Adenosine (triphosphate) has been reported to provoke dormant electrical conduction between the left atrium and Pulmonary Veins (PV) after an initially successful PV isolation (PVI).
• Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) guided PVI has been shown to improve the outcomes of AF ablation.
Hachiya H, et al. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007;18(4):392.
Matsuo S, et al. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007;18(7):704.
Kumagai K, et al. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010;21(5):494.
Macle L, et al. Lancet 2015;386,9994:672.
AimAim
• The aim of this large-scale (>2,000) multicenter
prospective randomized controlled trial was to evaluate
the efficacy of ATP-guided PVI as compared with
conventional PVI in patients undergoing AF ablation.
EndpointEndpoint
Primary endpoint
•Recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias* at 1-year with a
blanking period of 90 days post ablation.
Event-free Survival from the Event-free Survival from the Primary EndpointPrimary Endpoint
Fre
edom
fro
m A
tria
l Tac
hyar
rhyt
hmia
s (%
) 100
80
60
40
20
0
0 90 180 270 365 465 Days After First Ablation
ATP-Guided PVI
Conventionaal PVI
68.7%
67.1 %
Log-rank P=0.19Adjusted HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.74-1.09, P=0.25
Intervall 0d 90d 180d
270d
365d
450d
ATP-Guided PVI; N at risk
1112 1111
896 800 625
Conventional PVI; N at risk
1001 999 787 701 533
Clinical Follow-upClinical Follow-up
• Periodical visits: @ 3-, 6-, and 12-month (ECG, blood
samples etc.)
• 2-week ambulatory electrogram recording: @ hospital-
discharge, 6-month and 12-month
• 24-hour Holter monitoring : @ 6- and 12-month
• Additional symptom driven ECG-monitoring
LEADLESS 2LEADLESS 2
Reddy et al, 2015
Leadless PMLeadless PM
Reddy et al, 2015
Leadless PMLeadless PM
Reddy et al, 2015
Leadless IILeadless II
Reddy et al, 2015
LEADLESS II: Procedural characteristicsLEADLESS II: Procedural characteristics
Reddy et al, 2015
LEADLESS II: Serious adverse eventsLEADLESS II: Serious adverse events
Reddy et al, 2015
AEGEANAEGEAN
AEGEAN: Assessment of an Education AEGEAN: Assessment of an Education and Guidance and Guidance program for Eliquis program for Eliquis
Adherence in Non-valvular AFAdherence in Non-valvular AF
• Primary Objective:
– To assess the impact of an educational program on
implementation phase adherence in patients taking apixaban
for SPAF. Assessed at 24 weeks after initiation using an EMD,
Helping Hand®
• Secondary Objectives:
– To assess the impact of an educational program on persistence
at 24 weeks inpatients taking apixaban
AEGEAN: Discussant reviewAEGEAN: Discussant review
• Importance
– First large prospective RCT of an educational intervention on adherence and
persistence to NOACs
– High rate of adherence and persistence overall on apixaban
– No additional value of a proactive educational program on adherence in the first 6
months of treatment, in a selected trial population
• Limitations
– Patient selection, which may not fully represent real life patients
• Measuring adherence increases adherence [the patient is ‘aware’]
• Comorbidities and regular healthcare professional contact may influence
adherence and persistence
– Not powered for efficacy and safety endpoints
– Long term adherence and persistence (beyond 6 months) may decrease over time