engineering the microstructure of semicrystalline polymers

18
Guruswamy Kumaraswamy Complex Fluids and Polymer Engineering National Chemical Laboratory, Pune, INDIA [email protected] Engineering the Microstructure of Semicrystalline Polymers

Upload: others

Post on 22-Jan-2022

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Engineering the Microstructure of Semicrystalline Polymers

Guruswamy Kumaraswamy

Complex Fluids and Polymer Engineering

National Chemical Laboratory, Pune, INDIA

[email protected]

Engineering the Microstructure of

Semicrystalline Polymers

Page 2: Engineering the Microstructure of Semicrystalline Polymers

Kobe, Japan (January 1995)

6000 dead

500000 homes destroyed

Osaka gas:

Iron/steel pipes failed

Entire Japanese pipe market (and most of

the European and North American

markets) for water and natural gas now

use polyethylene piping

Semicrystalline Polymers: Who Cares?

Sourc

e: w

ww

.tham

esw

ater

.co.u

k

Imag

es f

rom

Wik

iped

ia

NO failures in PE pipes

Page 3: Engineering the Microstructure of Semicrystalline Polymers

There is polyethylene, and then there is polyethylene…

How does “pipe grade” PE differ from “plastic bucket” PE?

Sourc

e: L

u (

1988)

J. Mat. Sci. 1988, 23, 643.

The microstructure of pipe grade PE inhibits

formation, propagation of cracks

What is microstructure, and what controls it?

Semicrystalline polymers ~ 70% of all synthetic polymers

(~225 billion kg/year)

Polyethylene: Example of semicrystalline polymer, viz. can

crystallize into 3D ordered structure

Microstructure (and properties) can be tailored for same molecule

Page 4: Engineering the Microstructure of Semicrystalline Polymers

Semi-crystalline: Amorphous and Crystal states co-exist

Far from equilibrium: Gibbs phase rule doesn’t hold

Cool

High temperature

“melt”

~ 10 nm

Polymers: Chain-like, form lamellar crystals

Semicrystalline microstructure S

ourc

e: K

rish

nas

wam

y (

2008)

Macromolecules 2008, 41, 1693.

In pipe grade PE

Macro-scale toughness controlled by

Molecular attributes (molecular

weight distribution, chemical

composition along polymer chain)

More “tie” chains that link crystalline

lamellae

Page 5: Engineering the Microstructure of Semicrystalline Polymers

Controlling semicrystalline microstructure

Changing the chemistry of the polymer: Changes at the reactor

level (difficult, expensive): pipe grade PE

Polymer crystallization is non-equilibrium (exploit this!)

> Process the polymer differently

> Engineer desired microstructure

> Control properties

Challenge: Tools to characterize microstructural development

(Still no way of measuring tie chain content)

Page 6: Engineering the Microstructure of Semicrystalline Polymers

Controlling semicrystalline microstructure

Delrin: Polyoxymethylene –(C–O)– (POM)

Engineering semicrystalline polymer

Excellent fatigue properties

Melts around 175oC, but stiffness

deteriorates near 100oC

Why?? What can we do about this?

Du

Po

nt

Del

rin

Des

ign G

uid

e II

I

H

H

Page 7: Engineering the Microstructure of Semicrystalline Polymers

Temperature dependent change in stiffness

Acta Cryst. 2007, 63, 190.

Polyoxymethylene forms helical structures

that pack into crystals

Believed that decreased stiffness on heating

due to increased torsional motions of chains

(intrinsic to the chain chemistry)

Does the interphase between lamellae play a role?

Compare model semicrystalline microstructures,

with same local crystal structure

Injection molded

from the melt.

Chain entanglements

create interphase

structure

Crystallized from

dilute solution.

Isolated crystals

from disentangled

chains

Page 8: Engineering the Microstructure of Semicrystalline Polymers

Solid State NMR: Chain mobility in both microstructures

Melt crystallized

Solution crystals

(a)

RT

323K

343K

373K

100 95 90 85 80

Chemical Shift (ppm)

(b)

373K

343K

323K

RT

DMA

AFM

Solution crystals don’t soften

Page 9: Engineering the Microstructure of Semicrystalline Polymers

25oC 100oC

Microstructural changes on heating POM

Use Small Angle X-ray Scattering (SAXS) to probe lamellae

Solution crystals are

stacks of ~11 nm crystals

SAXS does not change

on heating to 150oC

Melt crystals: Polydisperse lamellae

stacked together

•On heating to

100oC, interspersed

thin lamellae melt

(US patent filed

Manuscript in preparation)

Page 10: Engineering the Microstructure of Semicrystalline Polymers

How can we dial-in lamellar structure?

“Sticky” additives that

make chains sluggish as

they crystallize on cooling

Lattice MC simulations to

model crystallization l=20

100

101

102

103

104

105

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0 H

0

5

10

20

30

40

50

(Xc-X

0 c)/

(X c-X

0 c)

MCS

Cry

sta

llin

ity

Suitable choice of additives

(with intermediate stickiness)

can qualitatively change

crystallization.

Dasmahapatra, Nanavati and Kumaraswamy

J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 131, 074905

Page 11: Engineering the Microstructure of Semicrystalline Polymers

Semicrystalline m-structure > Orientation (by flow)

Low viscosity protein “dope”

solution spun by the spider through

a “hyperbolic die”

Strong elongational flow induces

orientation

Nature 2001, 410, 541; Science 1996, 271, 39

High modulus and toughness

Page 12: Engineering the Microstructure of Semicrystalline Polymers

What does flow do?

Flow

Relaxation

Orientation, Stress

trelax ≈ O (1-10 ms) at 150oC

for PE with MW = 105 g/mol

Polymers are liquid-like,

but relax slowly

Chain-chain entanglements inhibit drawing

Macromolecules 2011, 44, 5558

Page 13: Engineering the Microstructure of Semicrystalline Polymers

DMDBS crystallizes to form a

dense network of 10 nm fibers

in PP

0.001 0.002

lnq

[I-I

24

0]

°q2 (A)

aPP at 155°C

sPP1 at 155°C

iPP5 at 165°C

iPP1 at 165°C

A strategy to induce orientation in PP: Oriented Scaffolds

Dimethyldibenzylidenesorbitol

0.8% in PP

Generate an oriented scaffold that locally stretches the polymer

and forces oriented crystallization

Macromolecules 2011, 44, 2358

DMDBS crystallizes to form a

dense network of 10 nm fibers

in PP

Page 14: Engineering the Microstructure of Semicrystalline Polymers

Cool to form DMDBS network

Pull to orient scaffold

PP crystallizes on oriented

scaffold

Modest draw ratios

Unable to orient neat PP

PP/0.8% DMDBS strongly oriented

Making oriented films

1.36 8.15 12 17

0%

0.2%

0.4%

0.8%

Draw ratio

Weig

ht

% o

f D

MD

BS

F

1.36 8.15 12 17

0%

0.2%

0.4%

0.8%

Draw ratio

Weig

ht

% o

f D

MD

BS

F

Page 15: Engineering the Microstructure of Semicrystalline Polymers

Can Dial-in Orientation (and Modulus)

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

(a)

0%

0.2%

0.4%

0.8%

Mo

du

lus

(GP

a)

With Modest processing draw ratios, can

Systematically dial in crystal orientation

Systematically dial in 2X modulus variation

f, Orientational order parameter

0 0.1 0.2 0.3

Polym. Eng. Sci. 2011, 51, 2013

Page 16: Engineering the Microstructure of Semicrystalline Polymers

The Frontiers

Connecting properties to

microstructure to

molecular structure to

reactor conditions

QUANTITATIVELY

Semicrystalline microstructure is complex

Quantitative measurement of microstructure, and

microstructural development, using a combination of

experimental tools : insights into connections with

properties and with molecular structure

Page 17: Engineering the Microstructure of Semicrystalline Polymers

Context: Plastics and Quality of Life

India, 2000

US, 2000

Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2006, 47, 222

2010: already at 500 billion lbs

As India, China rise on this curve,

need to optimize polymers to do

more

Page 18: Engineering the Microstructure of Semicrystalline Polymers

Structure Control in Polymers, Polymer Crystallization

“Soft Matter”

Weak interactions (~kBT, compare with covalent bond energies

of 102 kBT)

Multitude of interactions

Several examples of out-of-equilibrium systems providing

opportunities to engineer microstructure and properties

Colloids, Surfactants, Liquid Crystals, Biological fluids, …

Poster: Using Soap Slime to

Assemble Nanoparticles