energy loss simulation for the cdf run ii w mass measurement tom riddick university college london

10
Energy Loss Simulation for the CDF Run II W Mass Measurement Tom Riddick University College London

Upload: catherine-briggs

Post on 20-Jan-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

The Tevatron and CDF 30/03/10 CDF W Mass Measurement Energy Loss Simulation 3 CDF (Collider Detector at Fermilab) Run II Tevatron D0 Main Injector protons antiprotons 1.96 TeV

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Energy Loss Simulation for the CDF Run II W Mass Measurement Tom Riddick University College London

Energy Loss Simulation for the CDF Run II W Mass

Measurement

Tom RiddickUniversity College London

Page 2: Energy Loss Simulation for the CDF Run II W Mass Measurement Tom Riddick University College London

Why Measure the W Mass ?

30/03/10 2CDF W Mass Measurement Energy Loss Simulation

Test of the Standard Model

Indirect constraint on Higgs mass

If LHC discovers Higgs, can compare indirect and direct mass measurements for indications of beyond the Standard Model physics

CDF Run II W Mass MeasurementAim: Measure the W mass to an accuracy of 25 MeV/c2

Using approximately 2.4/fb of data collected at CDF Run II

Page 3: Energy Loss Simulation for the CDF Run II W Mass Measurement Tom Riddick University College London

The Tevatron and CDF

30/03/10 CDF W Mass Measurement Energy Loss Simulation 3

CDF (Collider Detector at Fermilab) Run II

Tevatron

D0

Main Injector

protonsantiprotons

1.96 TeV

Page 4: Energy Loss Simulation for the CDF Run II W Mass Measurement Tom Riddick University College London

How to Measure the W Mass?

30/03/10 CDF W Mass Measurement Energy Loss Simulation 4

Two Channels: W → eνe W → μνμ

MT = 2pTlET

μiss(1−cosΔφ)

Template Fitting Procedure:

“Transverse mass of the W boson”

Page 5: Energy Loss Simulation for the CDF Run II W Mass Measurement Tom Riddick University College London

UCL Fast Simulation

30/03/10 CDF W Mass Measurement Energy Loss Simulation 5

Use our own fast simulation for MC• Fast (> 100 Faster than GEANT based CDFSim)• Can Control physics models used • Can tune specifically for W mass analysis• e.g. E/p scale

E / p=Electroν Eνergy Measured iν Caloriμ eterElectroν Moμ eνtuμ Measured iν Tracker

Pair Production

For our Wev candidate events:

Measure p in trackere-gamma

Measure E in calorimeter

Bremsstrahlung in Silicontracker

Page 6: Energy Loss Simulation for the CDF Run II W Mass Measurement Tom Riddick University College London

The Bremsstrahlung Spectrum

30/03/10 CDF W Mass Measurement Energy Loss Simulation 6

dsdk

=4are

2

3kξ(s){y2G(s)+ 2[1+ (1−y)2 ]φ(s)}⎡⎣

×[Z2(Fel−f)+ ZFiνel]+ (1−y)Z2 + Z

3⎤⎦⎥×

k2

k2 + kp2

⎡⎣⎢⎢

⎤⎦⎥⎥

We are interested in the energy spectrum of the radiated photon

Many different models e.g. GEANT 4.9.2:

Incident Electron, Energy E Radiated

Photon, Energy k

Matter Effects: LPM effect and Dielectric Effect

kE<

EELPM

Important when where ELPM =aμ 2X0

4hc

Page 7: Energy Loss Simulation for the CDF Run II W Mass Measurement Tom Riddick University College London

Change in LPM Cut-Off

Significant Changes at High-ySignificant

Changes at Low-y

Bremsstrahlung

30/03/10 CDF W Mass Measurement Energy Loss Simulation 7

Release of new GEANT 4.9.2 with new model for Bremsstrahlung (19/12/2008)

Validate against actual experimental data to see which is best for our energy regime…

25 GeV test beam experiment run at at SLAC

GEANT 4.9.2 performs better at very low k

GEANT 4.9.2 soft LPM cut-off matches data better

yeff =keffE

=Radiated Photoν Eνergy∑

Iνcideνt Electroν Eνergy

Page 8: Energy Loss Simulation for the CDF Run II W Mass Measurement Tom Riddick University College London

LPM effect occurs at higher y values for Copper

Simulated Silicon Spectrum

Simulated Copper Spectrum

Theoretical Copper Spectrum

30/03/10 CDF W Mass Measurement Energy Loss Simulation 8

Two Element ModelUse detailed material map of- Radiation Lengths- Bethe-Bloch Equation Constants

LPM effect is dependant on material- Can’t capture LPM physics by just getting total radiation length correct- Study effect of modelling all the material as alternating layers of two differents elements

For each layer of the map:

thickness of material i in layer

Bethe-Bloch equation constant of material i

Radiation length of material i

Page 9: Energy Loss Simulation for the CDF Run II W Mass Measurement Tom Riddick University College London

Pair Production

30/03/10 CDF W Mass Measurement Energy Loss Simulation 9

Compare our pair production simulation to GEANT4’s using a virtual test beam setup

x =EElectroν

EPhotoν

Update our simulation to match GEANT4’s

Cross check against theoretical papers

GEANT 4 has Coulomb Correction + incomplete screening

Page 10: Energy Loss Simulation for the CDF Run II W Mass Measurement Tom Riddick University College London

Conclusions

Energy loss modelling in UCL Fast Simulation now uses the most accurate and sophisticated models available

30/03/10 CDF W Mass Measurement Energy Loss Simulation 10

Composition of tracking detector has been studied and modelled

Measuring W mass to 25 MeV requires us to constrain individual systematic errors to just a few MeV

Must use the best available energy loss model to reduce energy loss systematic as far as possible

Still generating final energy loss systematic, but it is looking likely it will be less than 7 MeV