embracing the elephant in the room: strategies for dealing with ethical issues at the end of life
DESCRIPTION
Embracing the Elephant in the Room: Strategies for Dealing with Ethical Issues at the End of Life Debbie Lafond, DNP, PNP-BC, CPON, CHPPN February 5, 2014. Speaker Disclosure Statement. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
11
Embracing the Elephant in the Room: Strategies for Dealing with Ethical Issues at the End of Life
Debbie Lafond, DNP, PNP-BC, CPON, CHPPNFebruary 5, 2014
22
Speaker Disclosure Statement• Debbie Lafond, DNP, PNP-BC, CPON, CHPPN is
a nurse practitioner at Children’s National Health System in Washington, DC.
• She has no relationships to disclose and no off-label use will be discussed.
33
Objectives
• To identify and discuss four common ethical situations in caring for children at end of life
• To discuss decision making and apply a tool for ethical decision making in a case study
• To describe issues of child and parental preferences in advanced care planning and strategies to facilitate goals of care discussions
• To identify and discuss issues of justice, conflict and research in palliative and end of life care for children with life-limiting illness
44
Ethics in Pediatric Palliative Care
• What ought to be
• Determining the best course of action
• Ethical issues are inevitable– Minors/Assent– Best interest standards
• Societal changes
55
Your Role in Addressing Ethical Issues
• Promoting family-centered care
• Respecting preferences
• Role models of clinical proficiency, integrity and compassion
• Balancing competing objectives
66
Standards of Professional Practice
• AMA Code of Ethics• ANA Code of Ethics• Nurse Practice Act
• Standards for professional organizations– AAP– APHON– NCHPCO
77
Issues of Decision-Making and Communication
• Capacity• Consent• Assent• Confidentiality
88
Decision-Making and Communication (cont.)
• Disclosure– Previous belief in not discussing diagnosis– Explore reasons for not disclosing– The CHILD’S right not to know
Hinds et al., 2010
99
Common Ethical Issues in Palliative Care
• Decision making• Transitioning goals of care• Withholding or withdrawal of life sustaining
interventions• Artificial fluid and nutrition• The doctrine of double effect• Religious or cultural objections• Declaring death, organ donation, and autopsy• Research
10
ProhibitProhibit
Don’tDon’tDiscussDiscuss
RequireRequire
Spectrum of approaches to influencing health-related behavior
ActivelyActivelyPromotePromote
Actively Actively DiscourageDiscourage
Provide Provide positivepositive
informationinformation
ProvideProvidenegative negative informationinformation
FinancialFinancialIncentivesIncentives
FinancialFinancialDisincentivesDisincentives
Wilfond, 2014
1111Wilfond, 2014
1212
Facilitating Ethical and Legal Practice
The 4 Box Method
Quality Quality of Lifeof Life
Patient Patient PreferencPreferenc
eses
Medical Medical IndicatioIndicatio
nsns
ContextuContextual al
FeaturesFeatures
Jonsen et al., 2010
1313
Medical Indications
• Indications for and against the intervention
• Reflect the goals of care
• Common ethical dilemmas
Jonsen et al., 2010
1414
Child and Family Preferences
• Principle of respect for persons– Autonomy, privacy, veracity
• Assess child/family understanding
Jonsen et al., 2010
1515
Quality of Life (QOL)
• Evaluation of prior QOL
• Expected QOL with and without treatment
• Common ethical dilemmas addressing QOL
Jonsen et al., 2010
1616
Contextual Features
• Social, legal, economic and institutional circumstances
• Common ethical dilemmas
Jonsen et al., 2010
1717
Julie’s Story
1818
Case Study - Julie’s Story• 16 year old young woman with an Anaplastic Astrocytoma diagnosed at the age of 9
years of age
• Received standard therapy with craniotomy (Gross total resection), Temozolomide during and after focal radiation therapy
• Recurrence at age 12 – Craniotomy (Gross total resection), High dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplant- High morbidity with lengthy hospitalizations and extended PICU stays- Intubation and ventilation → BiPAP
• Recurrence at age 14 years – Craniotomy (Gross total resection), Re-irradiation therapy
• Progression at age 15 – Enrolled on Phase I clinical trial → Progression after 4 monthsEnrolled on 2nd Phase I clinical trial → Progression after 2 cycles
• Progression at age 16 – Julie makes decision for no further therapy
1919
Julie’s Case – The Ethical Issues
Julie and parents have a strained relationship that pre-dated recent recurrences
Parents insist that curative intent therapy be continued- Parents have a deep Catholic faith and use this as a basis for decisions
Julie has two siblings: - an older sister (Susie – age 20) and a younger brother (Jonathan – age 13) - Susie gets along well with her parents and is Julie’s confidant - Jonathan is a quiet and introspective young man who rarely comes to the hospital
Julie has been approached several times to discuss her wishes and goals of care but declines to discuss - Julie states empathically to APN that she does NOT want her parents to make her decisions as they will do anything to keep her alive - When pushed, Julie finally states she wants Susie to be her surrogate decision maker
2020
Ethical Issue #1 – Decision Making
• Who is making the decisions?- Parents/Guardian- Other surrogate- Adolescent or young adult- Child- Others involved
2121
Ethical Issue # 2 – Goals of Care
• Prolongation of life– Curative intent– Acute therapeutic care– Life sustaining treatments (LST)– What about cases of uncertainty
• Futility
Jonsen et al., 2010; Prince-Paul & Daly, 2010
2222
Cure Prolong lifeProlong lifeComfort
Morbidity High Moderate Mild Minimal
Psychological
attitude
Win Fight Live with it Embrace
Tumor effect Eradicate Response Arrest growth None
Goals of care in Pediatric Oncology
Hope Hope Hope Hope Baker, 2013
2323
Ethical Issue # 2 – Goals of Care
• Do Not Resuscitation (DNR)
• Allow Natural Death (AND)
• Medical Futility
• Texas law – unilateral DNR decisions?
2424
Ethical Issue # 2 – Goals of Care
• Assisted death
• Euthanasia
2525
Ethical Issue # 3 – Withholding/Withdrawal
• Withholding/withdrawing of medical interventions– Balancing benefits and burdens– Withdrawal of treatment is NOT withdrawal
of care
2626
Ethical Issue # 4 – Artificial Fluids and Nutrition
• Controversial• Interpretations in context of parental, religious
and medical beliefs• Decisions may be impacted by:
- awareness of hunger- ability to tolerate enteral feeds- opinions about prolonging the dying process
2727
Ethical Issue # 5 - Principle of Double Effect
• An ethically permissible effect can be allowed, even if the ethically undesirable one will inevitably follow.
Jonsen et al., 2010
2828
Ethical Issue # 6 – Religion and Culture
• Role of the spiritual leader in decision making• Balancing hope• Respecting rituals• Managing conflict• Medical obligations for treatment• Parental rights versus rights of the child who may
or may not embrace same religious or cultural beliefs
2929
Ethical Issue # 7 – Death, organ donation, and autopsy
• Neurologic criteria
• Cardiac criteria
• Who should discuss organ donation?
• When to discuss autopsy?
3030
Issues of Justice in Palliative Care
• Provision of quality palliative care
• Costs of palliative care
3131
Research In Pediatric Care
• Is research appropriate?Informed consent
• National Commission for Protection of Human Subjects
3232
Authority of Parents
• Children are deemed legally capable of consent at age 18
• Challenge of determining relevance and weight of parental and patient preferences
Jonsen et al., 2010
3333
Standard for Parental Preferences
• Parents as moral and legal agents
• Parents evaluation of treatment efficacy or futility
• Instances of parent and physician conflict
Jonsen et al., 2010
3434
Managing Disagreement
• Parent – child conflict
• Minors
• Legal issues, etc.
3535
Managing Disagreement (cont.)
• Parent – parent conflict
• Parent – physician conflict
3636
Organizational Ethics & Legal Practices
• Organizational ethics
• Ethics committees and consultation– Education– Policy development
– Case consultation
3737
Back to Julie…
3838
Understand their Experience• Impact of illness on patient and family life
– Perception of suffering informs decision making– Quality of life is a greater factor in decision making as
the illness advances– Values, fears, and hopes influence decision making– Uncertainty about the future is a great source of
distress
• Prompt– “How has being sick been for your child and your
family?”– “What are the most difficult things you and your family
have had to endure during this time?”
Baker, 2013
3939
Understand Values• Values
– Personal beliefs that people consider important, and to which they are emotionally attached
– Subjective, evolve over time as a result of personal experiences
– Give meaning to a person’s life– May dictate care preferences
• Prompt– “How do you define ‘Being a Good Parent’ to your child?”– “How can we as a staff help you accomplish this?” – “Given your understanding of this new recurrence, what is
most important for you and your family?”
Baker, 2013
4040
Understand Hope• Hope
– Quality that sustains the person in the presence of uncertainty– A response to severe distress that facilitates adaptation to a
situation that can not be controlled– A desire of some good, accompanied with an expectation of
obtaining it, or a belief that it is obtainable– Presupposes an accurate assessment and acknowledgment of
the reality of the situation– May dictate care preferences
• Prompt – “What are your hopes for your child and family?”– “What else are you hoping for?”
Baker, 2013
4141
Conclusion
• Engage in a process of ethical discernment
• Apply principles of ethics
• Use ethical process to seek balance in decision-making
• Advocate for children and families
4242
There’s an elephant in the room.It’s large and squatting, so it’s hard to get round it.Yet we squeeze by with, “How are you?” and “I’m fine,” And a thousand other forms of trivial chatter. We talk about the weather. We talk about work.We talk about everything else, except that elephant in the room. There’s an elephant in the room.We all know it’s there.We’re thinking about the elephant as we talk together.It’s constantly on our minds. For, you see, it is a very large elephant.It has hurt us all.
The Elephant in the Room
4343
But we don’t talk about the elephant in the room.Oh, please say his (her) name.Oh, please, say his (her) name again.Oh please, talk about the elephant in the room. For if we talk about his (her) death, Perhaps we can talk about his (her) life.Can I say his (her) name to you and not have you look away?For if I cannot, then you are leaving me………alone……..in a room…..With an elephant…..
Terry Kettering
4444
References
• Basu, RK. (2013). End-of-life care in pediatrics: ethics, controversies, and optimizing the quality of death. Pediatric Clinics of North America. 60, 725-739.
• Clark JD & Dudzinski DM. (2013). The culture of dysthanasia: attempting CPR in terminally ill children. Pediatrics. 131(3), 572-580.
• Field MJ, Behrman RE eds for the Institute of Medicine Committee on Palliative and End of Life care for Children and Their Families. (2003). When children die: improving palliative care and end of life care for children and their families. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
• Guedert JM & Grossman S. (2012). Ethical problems in pediatrics: what does the setting of care and education show us? BMC Medical Ethics. 13(2), 1-9.
• Rushton, CH. (2004). Ethics and palliative care in pediatrics. American Journal of Nursing. 104(4), 54-63.
• Sharman M, Meert KL, & Sarnaik AP. (2005). What influences parents’ decisions to limit or withdraw life support? Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. 6(5), 513-518.
• Wainwright P & Gallagher A. (2007). Ethical aspects of withdrawing and withholding treatment. Nursing Standard. 21(33), 46-50.