ellopa 2001 and 2002 early language listening & oral proficiency assessment

30
1 ELLOPA 2001 and 2002 Early Language Listening & Oral Proficiency Assessment Spanish & Japanese Partial Immersion Program Compiled by Michele Anciaux Aoki, Ph.D. John Stanford International School Seattle, WA

Upload: yori

Post on 09-Jan-2016

76 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

ELLOPA 2001 and 2002 Early Language Listening & Oral Proficiency Assessment. Spanish & Japanese Partial Immersion Program Compiled by Michele Anciaux Aoki, Ph.D. John Stanford International School Seattle, WA. Overview of the Evaluation. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ELLOPA 2001 and 2002 Early Language Listening & Oral Proficiency Assessment

1

ELLOPA 2001 and 2002Early Language Listening & Oral Proficiency Assessment

Spanish & Japanese Partial Immersion Program

Compiled by Michele Anciaux Aoki, Ph.D.

John Stanford International School Seattle, WA

Page 2: ELLOPA 2001 and 2002 Early Language Listening & Oral Proficiency Assessment

John Stanford International School 2

Overview of the Evaluation 2001 ELLOPA was conducted by team from

Center for Applied Linguistics over 4 days in May with K and 1st grade students (completing first year of immersion)

2002 Evaluation was completed by JSIS staff and UW graduate students over 3 weeks in May-June with K, 1st, and 2nd grade students (1st and 2nd graders completing second year of immersion)

2002 Evaluators received training in ELLOPA interviewing and rating at UW in April, 2002, as well as on-site training and coaching with Beverly Boyson of CAL in May, 2002

Page 3: ELLOPA 2001 and 2002 Early Language Listening & Oral Proficiency Assessment

John Stanford International School 3

About the ELLOPA

Language Areas:

Oral Fluency Grammar Vocabulary Listening

Comprehension

Proficiency Levels: Junior Novice Low (1) Junior Novice Mid (2) Junior Novice High (3) Junior Intermediate Low (4)

Notes: All ratings above 4 were categorized

as 4 for the purposes of the ELLOPA statistics.

Teachers used the same Rating Profile to rate students based on classroom experience.

Page 4: ELLOPA 2001 and 2002 Early Language Listening & Oral Proficiency Assessment

John Stanford International School 4

What do we want the data to tell us?

How well are our students learning Spanish or Japanese? (Can we see growth across years?)

Do students learn Japanese at the same rate as Spanish?

How well did we do in assessing our students’ language proficiency? (How do ELLOPA ratings compare to Teacher Ratings?)

Page 5: ELLOPA 2001 and 2002 Early Language Listening & Oral Proficiency Assessment

John Stanford International School 5

ELLOPA – Kindergarten

Jr Nov Low Jr Nov Mid Jr Nov High Jr Int LowOral Fluency 15.4% 53.8% 15.4% 15.4%Grammar 15.4% 53.8% 15.4% 15.4%Vocabulary 15.4% 53.8% 19.3% 11.5%Listening Comp 3.8% 13.5% 50.0% 32.7%

Jr Nov Low Jr Nov Mid Jr Nov High Jr Int LowOral Fluency 46.2% 26.9% 7.7% 19.2%Grammar 50.0% 23.1% 7.7% 19.2%Vocabulary 50.0% 23.1% 7.7% 19.2%Listening Comp 3.8% 42.3% 23.1% 30.8%

ELLOPA Spanish 2001 - K

ELLOPA Spanish 2002 - K

ELLOPA Japanese 2002 - KJr Nov Low Jr Nov Mid Jr Nov High Jr Int Low

Oral Fluency 67.9% 17.9% 0.0% 14.3%Grammar 67.9% 17.9% 0.0% 14.3%Vocabulary 75.0% 10.7% 0.0% 14.3%Listening Comp 17.9% 53.6% 7.1% 21.4%

Page 6: ELLOPA 2001 and 2002 Early Language Listening & Oral Proficiency Assessment

John Stanford International School 6

Teacher Ratings – KindergartenTeacher Ratings Spanish 2001 - K

Teacher Ratings Spanish 2002 - K

Teacher Ratings Japanese 2002 - K

Jr Nov Low Jr Nov Mid Jr Nov High Jr Int LowOral Fluency 38.5% 42.3% 19.2%Grammar 34.6% 46.2% 19.2%Vocabulary 34.6% 46.2% 19.2%Listening Comp 46.2% 34.6% 19.2%

Jr Nov Low Jr Nov Mid Jr Nov High Jr Int LowOral Fluency 17.9% 67.9% 14.3%Grammar 17.9% 67.9% 14.3%Vocabulary 21.4% 57.1% 7.1% 14.3%Listening Comp 17.9% 67.9% 14.3%

Page 7: ELLOPA 2001 and 2002 Early Language Listening & Oral Proficiency Assessment

John Stanford International School 7

ELLOPA Spanish 2001 - K

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

Jr NovLow

Jr NovMid

Jr NovHigh

Jr IntLow

Oral FluencyGrammarVocabularyListening Comp

Page 8: ELLOPA 2001 and 2002 Early Language Listening & Oral Proficiency Assessment

John Stanford International School 8

ELLOPA Spanish 2002 - K

0.0%5.0%

10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%

Jr NovLow

Jr NovMid

Jr NovHigh

Jr IntLow

Oral FluencyGrammarVocabularyListening Comp

Page 9: ELLOPA 2001 and 2002 Early Language Listening & Oral Proficiency Assessment

John Stanford International School 9

Teacher Ratings Spanish 2002 - K

0.0%5.0%

10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%

Jr NovLow

Jr NovMid

Jr NovHigh

Jr IntLow

Oral FluencyGrammarVocabularyListening Comp

Page 10: ELLOPA 2001 and 2002 Early Language Listening & Oral Proficiency Assessment

John Stanford International School 10

ELLOPA Japanese 2002 - K

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

Jr NovLow

Jr NovMid

Jr NovHigh

Jr IntLow

Oral FluencyGrammarVocabularyListening Comp

Page 11: ELLOPA 2001 and 2002 Early Language Listening & Oral Proficiency Assessment

John Stanford International School 11

Teacher Ratings Japanese 2002 - K

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

Jr NovLow

Jr NovMid

Jr NovHigh

Jr IntLow

Oral FluencyGrammarVocabularyListening Comp

Page 12: ELLOPA 2001 and 2002 Early Language Listening & Oral Proficiency Assessment

John Stanford International School 12

ELLOPA Spanish/Japanese KMean or Average of Scores in 2001 and 2002

Oral Fluency Grammar Vocabulary Listening CompSpanish 2001 2.31 2.31 2.27 3.11Spanish 2002 2.00 1.96 1.96 2.81Japanese 2002 1.61 1.61 1.54 2.32

Page 13: ELLOPA 2001 and 2002 Early Language Listening & Oral Proficiency Assessment

John Stanford International School 13

ELLOPA Spanish/Japanese 2001 - 2002 - K

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

Spanish2001

Spanish2002

Japanese2002

Oral FluencyGrammarVocabularyListening Comp

Mean or Average

Page 14: ELLOPA 2001 and 2002 Early Language Listening & Oral Proficiency Assessment

John Stanford International School 14

ELLOPA 1st Grade

ELLOPA Spanish 2001 – 1st (after first year of language)

ELLOPA Spanish 2002 – 1st (after second year of language)

Jr Nov Low Jr Nov Mid Jr Nov High Jr Int LowOral Fluency 8.7% 69.6% 13.0% 8.7%Grammar 8.7% 69.6% 13.0% 8.7%Vocabulary 8.7% 71.7% 10.9% 8.7%Listening Comp 2.2% 8.7% 65.2% 23.9%

Jr Nov Low Jr Nov Mid Jr Nov High Jr Int LowOral Fluency 5.0% 22.5% 32.5% 40.0%Grammar 5.0% 27.5% 32.5% 35.0%Vocabulary 5.0% 27.5% 30.0% 37.5%Listening Comp 0.0% 10.0% 32.5% 57.5%

Page 15: ELLOPA 2001 and 2002 Early Language Listening & Oral Proficiency Assessment

John Stanford International School 15

ELLOPA Spanish 2001 – 1st

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

Jr NovLow

Jr NovMid

Jr NovHigh

Jr IntLow

Oral FluencyGrammarVocabularyListening Comp

(first year in the program)

Page 16: ELLOPA 2001 and 2002 Early Language Listening & Oral Proficiency Assessment

John Stanford International School 16

ELLOPA Spanish 2002 – 1st

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

Jr NovLow

Jr NovMid

Jr NovHigh

Jr IntLow

Oral FluencyGrammarVocabularyListening Comp

(second year in the

program)

Page 17: ELLOPA 2001 and 2002 Early Language Listening & Oral Proficiency Assessment

John Stanford International School 17

Teacher Ratings Spanish 2002 – 1st

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

Jr NovLow

Jr NovMid

Jr NovHigh

Jr IntLow

Oral FluencyGrammarVocabularyListening Comp

(second year in the

program)

Page 18: ELLOPA 2001 and 2002 Early Language Listening & Oral Proficiency Assessment

John Stanford International School 18

ELLOPA & Teacher Ratings 2nd Grade

ELLOPA Spanish 2002 – 2nd (after second year of language) Jr Nov Low Jr Nov Mid Jr Nov High Jr Int LowOral Fluency 16.7% 16.7% 22.2% 44.4%Grammar 16.7% 16.7% 16.7% 50.0%Vocabulary 11.1% 27.8% 27.8% 33.3%Listening Comp 5.6% 22.2% 16.7% 55.6%

Teacher Ratings Spanish 2002 – 2nd (after second year of language) Jr Nov Low Jr Nov Mid Jr Nov High Jr Int LowOral Fluency 2.7% 29.7% 21.6% 45.9%Grammar 10.8% 29.7% 24.3% 35.1%Vocabulary 2.7% 24.3% 35.1% 37.8%Listening Comp 0.0% 2.7% 37.8% 59.5%

Page 19: ELLOPA 2001 and 2002 Early Language Listening & Oral Proficiency Assessment

John Stanford International School 19

ELLOPA Spanish 2002 – 2nd

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

Jr NovLow

Jr NovMid

Jr NovHigh

Jr IntLow

Oral FluencyGrammarVocabularyListening Comp

(second year in the

program)

Page 20: ELLOPA 2001 and 2002 Early Language Listening & Oral Proficiency Assessment

John Stanford International School 20

Teacher Ratings Spanish 2002 – 2nd

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

Jr NovLow

Jr NovMid

Jr NovHigh

Jr IntLow

Oral FluencyGrammarVocabularyListening Comp

(second year in the

program)

Page 21: ELLOPA 2001 and 2002 Early Language Listening & Oral Proficiency Assessment

John Stanford International School 21

ELLOPA/Teacher Rating – K

ELLOPA/Teacher Rating Spanish 2001 vs. 2002 – KOral Fluency Grammar Vocabulary Listening Comp

ELLOPA 2001 2.31 2.31 2.27 3.11Teacher 2001 2.56 2.67 3.02 3.17ELLOPA 2002 2.00 1.96 1.96 2.81Teacher 2002 2.00 2.04 2.04 2.73

Page 22: ELLOPA 2001 and 2002 Early Language Listening & Oral Proficiency Assessment

John Stanford International School 22

ELLOPA/Teacher Rating Spanish 2001, 2002 - K

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

ELLOPA2001

Teacher2001

ELLOPA2002

Teacher2002

Oral FluencyGrammarVocabularyListening Comp

Mean or Average

Page 23: ELLOPA 2001 and 2002 Early Language Listening & Oral Proficiency Assessment

John Stanford International School 23

ELLOPA/Teacher Rating 1st – 2nd

ELLOPA/Teacher Rating Spanish 2001 – 1st, 2002 – 1st

ELLOPA/Teacher Rating Spanish 2002 – 2nd

Oral Fluency Grammar Vocabulary Listening CompELLOPA 2001 2.22 2.22 2.20 3.11Teacher 2001 2.41 2.46 2.89 3.43ELLOPA 2002 3.08 2.98 3.00 3.48Teacher 2002 2.93 2.93 3.02 3.61

Page 24: ELLOPA 2001 and 2002 Early Language Listening & Oral Proficiency Assessment

John Stanford International School 24

ELLOPA/Teacher Rating Spanish 2001, 2002 – 1st

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

4.00

ELLOPA2001

Teacher2001

ELLOPA2002

Teacher2002

Oral FluencyGrammarVocabularyListening Comp

Mean or Average

(2001 – one year of study;

2002 – two years of study)

Page 25: ELLOPA 2001 and 2002 Early Language Listening & Oral Proficiency Assessment

John Stanford International School 25

ELLOPA/Teacher Rating Spanish 2001, 2002 – 2nd

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

4.00

ELLOPA 2002 Teacher 2002

Oral FluencyGrammarVocabularyListening Comp

Mean or Average

Page 26: ELLOPA 2001 and 2002 Early Language Listening & Oral Proficiency Assessment

John Stanford International School 26

ELLOPA/Teacher Rating Growth

ELLOPA/Teacher Rating Spanish 2001 – K, 2002 – 1st

ELLOPA/Teacher Rating Spanish 2001 – 1st, 2002 – 2nd

Oral Fluency Grammar Vocabulary Listening CompELLOPA 2001 2.31 2.31 2.27 3.11Teacher 2001 2.56 2.67 3.02 3.17ELLOPA 2002 3.08 2.98 3.00 3.48Teacher 2002 2.93 2.93 3.02 3.61

Oral Fluency Grammar Vocabulary Listening CompELLOPA 2001 2.22 2.22 2.20 3.11Teacher 2001 2.41 2.46 2.89 3.43ELLOPA 2002 2.94 3.00 2.83 3.22Teacher 2002 3.11 2.84 3.08 3.57

Page 27: ELLOPA 2001 and 2002 Early Language Listening & Oral Proficiency Assessment

John Stanford International School 27

ELLOPA/Teacher Rating Spanish 2001, 2002 – K-1 growth

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

4.00

ELLOPA2001

Teacher2001

ELLOPA2002

Teacher2002

Oral FluencyGrammarVocabularyListening Comp

Mean or Average

(growth over 2 years)

Page 28: ELLOPA 2001 and 2002 Early Language Listening & Oral Proficiency Assessment

John Stanford International School 28

ELLOPA/Teacher Rating Spanish 2001, 2002 – 1-2 growth

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

4.00

ELLOPA2001

Teacher2001

ELLOPA2002

Teacher2002

Oral FluencyGrammarVocabularyListening Comp

Mean or Average

(growth over 2 years)

Page 29: ELLOPA 2001 and 2002 Early Language Listening & Oral Proficiency Assessment

John Stanford International School 29

Paired ELLOPA Ratings 2001, 2002 – K-1 and 1-2 growth

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

2001(K)

2002(1st)

2001(1st)

2002(2nd)

Oral FluencyGrammarVocabularyListening Comp

Mean or Average

This is the most accurate representation of growth because it compares only students who were in the

program both years.

According to CAL, the rate of growth is

statistically significant.

Page 30: ELLOPA 2001 and 2002 Early Language Listening & Oral Proficiency Assessment

John Stanford International School 30

How did JSIS raters compare to CAL?

020406080

100120140160180200

K 1st 2nd

Total RatingsSame as CALHigher than CALLower than CAL

Number of Ratings of Oral Fluency, Grammar,

Vocabulary, and Listening Comprehension

Beverly Boyson of CAL reviewed ELLOPA note sheets from JSIS raters and modified ratings where appropriate