electroless nickel plating of arc discharge synthesized carbon nanotubes for metal matrix composites
TRANSCRIPT
Accepted Manuscript
Title: Electroless Nickel Plating of Arc Discharge SynthesizedCarbon Nanotubes for Metal Matrix Composites
Author: M. Jagannatham S. Sankaran Prathap Haridoss
PII: S0169-4332(14)02416-7DOI: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.10.150Reference: APSUSC 29015
To appear in: APSUSC
Received date: 29-4-2014Revised date: 9-10-2014Accepted date: 27-10-2014
Please cite this article as: M. Jagannatham, S. Sankaran, P. Haridoss, Electroless NickelPlating of Arc Discharge Synthesized Carbon Nanotubes for Metal Matrix Composites,Applied Surface Science (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.10.150
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication.As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript.The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proofbefore it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production processerrors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers thatapply to the journal pertain.
Page 1 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
Electroless Nickel Plating of Arc Discharge Synthesized Carbon Nanotubes
for Metal Matrix Composites
M. Jagannatham, S. Sankaran, Prathap Haridoss*
Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai-600036, India.
*Corresponding author address:
Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai-600036, India.
E-mail: [email protected], Phone: +91-4422574771
Abstract
Electroless nickel (EN) plating was performed on arc discharge synthesized multiwalled
carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) for various deposition times. X-ray diffraction (XRD),
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and Raman spectroscopy characterization
techniques are used to identify the presence of nickel deposition on the carbon nanotubes
(CNTs) and the degree of graphitization. The results indicate that impurities are less in the
purified CNTs as compared to raw carbon soot. Increasing deposition time up to 60 minutes
increases uniform deposition of nickel throughout the length of the CNTs. However, for
deposition time longer than 60 minutes, nickel particles are seen separated from the surface
of the CNTs. Uniformly coated nickel CNTs throughout their length are potential candidates
for reinforcements in composite materials. Magnetic properties of the nickel coated CNTs,
with deposition time of 30 and 60 minutes were also evaluated. The magnetic saturation of
nickel coated CNTs with deposition time of 30 minutes is less compared to nickel coated
CNTs with deposition time of 60 minutes.
Keywords: Carbon nanotubes, EN coatings, Deposition time, TEM, Metal Matrix
Composites, Magnetic Properties
Page 2 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
1. Introduction
Ever since their discovery by Iijima [1], carbon nanotubes have been attractive materials for
several possible applications either in single walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) or multi
walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs). CNTs are interesting materials due to their excellent
mechanical, electrical and thermal properties. Recent studies on mechanical properties of
CNTs through in-situ tests in SEM [2] and TEM [3] demonstrated high strength, between 20
GPa-63 GPa, and high Young’s modulus, between 590 GPa-1105 GPa. CNTs are considered
as a promising reinforcement materials in metal, polymer and ceramic matrix composite
materials for structural applications because of their attractive mechanical properties, large
aspect ratio and low density. In metal matrix composites (MMCs), especially in Al based
composites; CNTs have been used as reinforcement to enhance the mechanical properties.
Many of these MMCs are produced by powder metallurgy (PM) processes [4-12]. However,
PM process is time consuming and cost of processing the composites is high. On the other
hand, casting is a simple and cost effective process for the fabrication of composites, but
producing MMCs by casting route is difficult. Limited wetting of the CNT reinforcement by
the matrix is a major obstacle for composite production by casting. Several studies have been
conducted on metallic coatings to modify the surface characteristics of CNTs [13-26].
Metallic coatings on CNTs aim to enhance the interface adhesion between the reinforcement
and the metal matrix by improving the wetting characteristics. Metallic coatings on CNTs
also enhance the electrical conductivity in CNT reinforced polymer matrix composites. The
most common used methods for applying metallic coating on CNTs are electroless and
electrolytic plating. Of these, electroless plating is very easy and is a relatively quick process.
In general, it is necessary to sensitize and activate the substrate before electroless plating in
order to obtain good quality coatings. To the best of the knowledge of authors, Li et al. were
the first to investigate electroless nickel plating on CNTs and achieved deposition of nickel
Page 3 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
particles on the CNTs [13]. Ang et al. performed EN plating on CNTs using a single
activation step prior to plating [14]. Ang et al. also studied electroless nickel and copper
plating [15]. Several studies have been focused on tribological and corrosion behavior of
nickel coated CNTs [16-22]; however, very few of them are focused on the magnetic
properties of these coated CNTs [23-25]. Lin et al. studied electroless Ni deposition on CNTs
for hydrogen storage applications [26]. It is noticed that many EN coating studies are
performed at room temperature using a single experimental condition. Literature on effect of
parameters for electroless plating of Ni on CNTs, are very limited. However, it is necessary
to study the effect of EN coating parameters, in particular duration of the coating process, to
obtain enhanced coatings. The duration of the coating process has significant impact on the
throughout and cost associated with the process and hence identifying the duration that also
results in excellent coating, is important.
In the present work, MWCNTs were synthesized using the electric arc discharge method
followed by purification using different methods. The purified CNTs were activated and EN
plating was performed on the activated CNTs with various stirring times. The optimum time
for EN deposition has been determined for the bath compositions chosen. The study to
determine the optimum time for EN deposition is presented, followed by the data obtained
through the characterization of the purified and the coated CNTs using XRD, SEM, TEM,
and Raman spectroscopy. The significance of the results obtained, from the perspective of
use for MMCs, is discussed. Magnetic properties of nickel coated CNTs deposited for 30 and
60 min were measured by using vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) and the results are
discussed.
Page 4 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Synthesis and purification of CNTs
Carbon nanotubes were synthesized using electric arc discharge technique with a rotating
cathode. The DC power supply used provided 150 A/cm2 and 32 V. Prior to arcing, graphite
powder from the anode was mixed with nickel, in a 1:1 ratio by weight. A hole, 3 mm in
diameter was made at the center of the cross-sectional surface of anode rod and filled
completely with the graphite-nickel mixture. The graphite anode was consumed while arcing
and soot was deposited on the rotating cathode with rotation speed set at 10 rpm. The
deposited soot was collected by scraping the cathode with a metal scraper. The obtained raw
soot was crushed using mortar and pestle to obtain fine soot powder. The crushed powder
was then washed with water and treated with toluene for 5 h to remove the impurities in the
raw fine powder. Toluene treated CNTs were then heat treated in a furnace at 650 oC for 3 h
in open air atmosphere followed by acid treatment, using 38% HCl, for further purification of
the CNTs. The raw soot and purified CNTs were characterized using XRD, SEM, TEM, and
Raman spectroscopy. Further, Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed on raw soot
CNTs to determine the thermal stability of the CNTs.
2.2. Sensitization and activation of purified CNTs
Purified CNTs were sensitized using a solution that was prepared with 4 gm SnCl2 and 20 ml
of 38% HCl solution (14-15), diluted with DI water for a total volume of 200 ml. This
solution was used to sensitize 2 gm of CNTs. The solution with the MWCNTs was
ultrasonicated for 20 min in an ultrasonic bath at 25 kHz frequency and stirred magnetically
for 20 min. After stirring, the solution was filtered using a G3 sintered glass and the powder
collected was dried in a hot air oven for 2 h at 120 ºC. Sensitized MWCNTs were activated
with 0.05 gm PdCl2/4 ml 38% HCl solution, diluted with DI water for a total volume of 200
Page 5 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
ml (14-15).The solution with MWCNTs was ultrasonicated for 20 min in an ultrasonic bath at
25 kHz and stirred magnetically for 20 min again. The solution was filtered using a G3
sintered glass and dried.
2.3. Electroless nickel coatings on activated CNTs
EN coatings were carried out on activated MWCNTs in an electroless nickel bath (14-15) for
various deposition times of 10, 15, 20, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, and 120 minutes at a pH value of
10.3. Table1 shows the chemical composition of the bath used for the EN experiments. The
concentrations of the chemicals were the same for all the experiments. The total volume of
the solution was 100 ml in all cases. The chemicals for the EN process were mixed in a
beaker and stirred at 85±2 °C. Stirred solution was filtered using a sintered G3 filter. After
filtration, the viscous solution containing the CNTs was dried in hot air oven at 150 °C. pH of
the solution was adjusted using NaOH buffer solution and the pH was maintained by adding
NaOH buffer solution every 5 min irrespective of deposition times. The pH was measured
using a pH meter, a Chemi Line Micro controller based pH meter; Model: CL 180 with
precision of 0.01 pH and with a precision of 0.2 °C for measuring temperature.
2.4. Characterization of electroless nickel coated CNTs
EN coated CNTs were characterized by Bruker X-Ray diffractometer with Cu Kradiation
(Wavelength is 1.5405 A°) for confirmation of the phases present in the samples. The range
of scan in XRD analysis was 2= 20° to 90° with scan rate of 0.1 degree/ sec. A Quanta 400
field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM), with an accelerating voltage of 30
kV, was used to characterize the surface morphology of the samples. Nickel deposited CNTs
were characterized by using a Philips CM-12 TEM, with LaB6 filament, operated at a voltage
of 120 kV. Samples used for TEM analysis were initially dispersed in methanol with
Page 6 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
ultrasonication at 25 kHz frequency and then the dispersed samples were placed on a carbon
coated Cu grid. EDS attached to the TEM was used to identify the local chemical
composition of nickel coated CNT samples. Raman spectroscopy was carried out using a
Horiba yvon HR-800 UV Laser Raman Spectrometer, using a He-Ne Laser with a
wavelength of 633 nm to characterize the electroless nickel coated CNTs.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Characterization of as synthesized CNTs
As synthesized CNTs generally contain other forms of carbon structures along with CNTs.
Purification of as synthesized CNTs reduces the impurities in the samples, as evidenced from
TEM analysis. TEM images of raw soot and purified CNTs are shown in Fig.1 (a) and Fig.1
(b), respectively. The major impurities in synthesized CNTs are amorphous carbon, metal
catalysts, and graphene sheets. The diameter of the CNTs synthesized was observed to be in
the range of 18-22 nm, but the length of the CNTs is around a few microns. Inset of Fig.1 (b)
indicates that the CNTs are multiwalled in nature. The peak at 2 = 26.4° in XRD pattern as
shown in Fig.2 indicates the graphitic nature of the CNTs. Inter planar spacing (Inter tubular
distance) of carbon nanotubes is calculated using the Bragg’s law, 2d Sin (=
Wavelength of X-rays) and d-spacing measured is 0.337 nm. It is very close to inter tubular
spacing of CNTs measured by TEM (0.34 nm). The other peaks in the XRD pattern of the
purified CNTs correspond to impurities such as amorphous carbon and graphene sheets.
From Raman spectroscopy analysis, as shown in Fig.3, it is observed that the ratio between
defect and graphitic intensities (ID/IG) is less for purified CNTs. This confirms that defects are
less in purified CNTs whereas the synthesized raw soot contains a higher amount of defects.
Fig. 4 shows the TGA curve of as synthesized CNTs. It is observed from the TGA curve that
CNTs are thermally stable up to 720 °C in open air environment. Above 720 °C, the weight
Page 7 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
of the raw soot CNTs sample decreases gradually. The weight gain above 800 °C can be
attributed to oxide formation on the nickel catalyst. The oxide formation is increased with
increasing temperature above 800 °C up to 1400 °C.
3.2. Optimization of nickel coatings on CNTs
Sensitization and activation of CNTs modify the surface of CNTs to make them hydrophilic
by which CNTs can attract metallic particles on to their surface. Fig.5 (a) shows the SEM
micrograph of sensitized and activated CNTs. Fig.5 (b) shows the EDS corresponding to the
sensitized and activated CNTs. EDS of the activated CNTs confirms the presence of Sn and
Pd. If active sites are formed by sensitization and activation, then it is easy to reduce the
metal ions on the surface of the CNTs at specific temperature and pH values [13]. EN plating
has been performed after the activation of CNTs. We have also performed EN coating of
CNTs without activating them. It is noticed that CNTs have not been coated in the absence of
activation. The cause for this is that because of non-catalytic characteristics of CNTs,
metallic particles will not adhere to CNTs surface without any pretreatment prior to
metallization of CNTs [27]. Hence, it is necessary to activate CNTs for metallic coatings to
deposit on them. It is observed from the XRD pattern of EN coatings as shown in Fig.6 that
the deposition of nickel on CNTs is increased with increasing deposition time from 10 min to
60 min. For the deposition time of 10 min, nickel content is less and with the increase in
deposition time the intensity of nickel peak increases. On the other hand, the intensity of peak
corresponding to CNTs is suppressed with increasing deposition time of EN plating. Presence
of phosphorus is observed from XRD pattern of EN plated CNTs due to the use of the
reduction agent, sodium hypophosphate, which yields the phosphorous. However, it is
noticed that if the concentration of the reducing agent is low, the phosphorous content is
minimal. Since phosphorous is also co-deposited during the electroless plating of CNTs,
Page 8 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
formation of Ni3P phase occurs because of the reaction between Ni and P. The formation of
Ni3P is undesirable as mechanical properties may deteriorate with this formation and it is
possible to reduce the formation of Ni3P by decreasing the phosphorous co-deposition in the
coatings. However, it is noticed that there is no nickel carbide observed in the XRD patterns
for all deposition times. The absence of nickel carbide is desirable since it is brittle and is
detrimental with respect to mechanical properties. Raman spectra of the nickel coated CNTs
for various deposition times are shown in Fig.7 (a). From the Raman spectrum of the nickel
coated CNTs with a deposition time of 60 min, it is observed that the peak at 626.82 cm-1 is
very strong along with D and G peak. This peak is not as strong for other deposition times.
The peak at 626.82 cm-1 corresponds to nickel and it is increased with increasing deposition
time as shown in Fig.7 (b), which is enlarged from Fig.7 (a). TEM characterization also
supports the Raman spectroscopy results on the effect of increased coating time on the
coating formed on the CNTs. Fig. 8 (a-d) show bright field TEM images of nickel coating for
various deposition times. EDS analysis of EN plating for the deposition time of 30 min is
shown in Fig. 9. EDS spectrum shows the presence of nickel. Cu in EDS spectrum is from the
grid used and Zn is from the sample holder. TEM image of Ni coated CNTs, with a
deposition time of 10 min shows that the coating is discontinuous and hence, the deposition
time for 10 min may not be sufficient for the nickel coating on the surface of the CNTs. Lin
et al. have also reported that low deposition time is not sufficient for deposition of nickel on
CNTs [26]. In their studies, it is mentioned that deposition time of 5 min was not sufficient
for Ni deposition by electroless plating. It is observed in the present investigation that the
increase in deposition time increases the nickel deposition. TEM images of EN coatings
reveals that the nickel coating with a deposition time of 60 min is uniform and it is
continuous throughout the length of CNTs. The thickness of the coating on the surface of
CNTs is a few nanometers; as confirmed by TEM images. The thickness of the coating is
Page 9 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
about 15 nm for a deposition time 60 min as shown in Fig. 8 (d). Increase in the deposition
time leads to the increase in metal ion reduction resulting in enhanced deposition on the
surface of the CNTs. Metal coating on the outer surface of the CNTs is uniform if there is a
greater density of active sites. In the absence of sufficient active sites, growth of the coating
normal to the surface is greater than that lateral to the surface [13].
The mechanism of the coating process including pretreatments such as sensitization and
activation of CNTs is explained in detail by Ang et al. [15]. Similar mechanism for
electroless deposition of nickel on CNTs has been explained by Kong et al. [27]. In both
these mechanisms, metal ions are reduced to metal by reducing agents and with control of
external parameters such as pH of the solution, time and temperature maintained during the
deposition process, the metal is attached to the surface of the CNTs. Uniform coating of
metal on CNTs is required to enhance the properties of composite materials. A gap between
metal particles deposited on the surface of the CNTs weakens the interfacial bond between
the reinforcement and the matrix. Such a gap has a detrimental effect on the mechanical
properties of the composite materials. EN coating with the deposition time longer than 60
minutes have also been studied. It is observed that when the deposition time is increased
beyond 60 minutes, nickel particles are detached from the surface of the CNTs. This
detachment of Ni was observed when EN deposition was carried out for 75, 90 and 120 min.
With increasing deposition time, the thickness of nickel deposited increased on the surface of
CNTs as shown in fig.10 of TEM images. The diameter of the nickel coated CNTs measured
in TEM images, is in the range of 32 nm to 40 nm for 60 minutes deposition time. However,
the diameter of the purified CNTs is 18-22 nm. Thus it is believed that the thickness of the Ni
on the surface of CNTs in the TEM images is in the range of 14 nm to 18 nm for a deposition
time of 60 min. For deposition time less than 60 min the coating is discontinuous and for
deposition times longer than 60 min, nickel particles are seen to be detached from the CNT
Page 10 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
surface as shown in fig.10. The formation of nickel particles detached from the surface of
CNTs leads to the formation of other phases with metal matrix when the coated CNTs are
used as reinforcements in composites such as Ni3Al in Al based metal matrix composites.
With formation of Ni3Al, mechanical properties will deteriorate since Ni3Al phase is brittle in
nature. It is therefore observed that a deposition time of 60 minutes is optimal for EN coating
on CNTs, from the perspective of use in MMCs.
3.3. Magnetic properties of electroless nickel coatings
Coating CNTs with nickel, makes them amenable to manipulation using magnetic forces.
Therefore it is of interest to study how Ni coated CNTs respond to external magnetic fields.
Magnetic measurements for nickel coated CNTs, were performed at room temperature by
using VSM (Lakeshore VSM 7410). The two samples studied had been coated for 30 minutes
and for 60 minutes with nickel. The M-H curve obtained is shown in figure11. It is observed
from Fig.11 (a) that for the sample coated for 60 minutes, the magnetization at saturation is
16.5 emu/g, whereas it is 10.8 emu/g for the sample coated for 30 minutes. These values are
lower than that of the bulk nickel which has a magnetization value at the room temperature of
54.4 emu/g [28]. Nano sized nickel often shows reduced magnetization compared to bulk
nickel because nano scale nickel has a large percentage of surface spins from which the
disordered magnetization orientation is high compared to bulk nickel [23, 29].The graph in
figure 11b indicates a lack of hysteresis suggestive of super paramagnetic behavior as
opposed to ferromagnetic behavior, consistent with nanoscale of the Ni particles. Hu et al.
reported super paramagnetic behavior of nano iron oxide particles [30]. They reported that
iron oxide nanoparticle with a size less than 10 nm, showed super paramagnetic behavior
rather than ferromagnetic behavior. They also reported that the saturation magnetization
value decreased with reduction in size of iron oxide. It is observed from fig.11 (b) that the
Page 11 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
hysteresis is minimal to nonexistent for the CNTs with Ni deposition durations of 30 minutes
and as well as 60 minutes. When compared to Ni coated CNTs with a deposition time of 60
minutes, the Ni coated CNTs with a deposition time of 30 minutes show less hysteresis. This
may be because the size of deposited nickel is smaller in the case of 30 minutes deposition
time compared to 60 minutes deposition. The crystalline size of Ni deposited for 30 min and
as well as Ni deposited for 60 minutes was measured by XRD by using the Williamson-Hall
method. The crystalline sizes and are 11.2 nm and 20.4 nm respectively, consistent with their
impact on the hysteresis displayed during magnetic measurements.
4. Conclusions
Carbon nanotubes were synthesized by rotating cathode arc discharge method in open air
atmosphere and purified. Electroless coating of Ni has been performed on the CNTs for
various deposition times. Deposition of nickel using electroless deposition method increased
with increase in deposition time. However, at much larger deposition times, excess Ni is seen
to be detached from the CNTs. Enhanced metal ion reduction with increasing deposition time
is responsible for the greater deposition of nickel on surface of CNTs while completion of the
coating of the CNTs leads to excess Ni appearing detached from the CNTs. A deposition time
of 60 minutes has been determined to be the optimum from the perspective of obtaining
uniform coating of Ni on the CNTs. The CNTs with uniform coating of nickel throughout
their length, produced through this work, have potential applications as reinforcements in
composite materials, particularly MMCs. The Nickel coatings are determined to be super
paramagnetic and can be manipulated accordingly if desired.
References
[1] S. Iijima, Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon, Nature 354 (1991) 56-58
Page 12 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
[2] M. F. Yu, B. F. Files, S. Arepalli, R. S. Ruoff, Tensile loading of ropes of single wall
carbon nanotubes and their mechanical properties, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (24) (2000) 5552-5555
[3] M. M. J. Treacy, T. W. Ebbesen, J. M. Gibson, Exceptionally high Young’s modulus
observed for individual carbon nanotubes, Nature 381 (6584) (1996) 678-680
[4] J. Yuuki, H. Kwon, A. Kawasaki, A. Magario, J. Beppu, M. Seki, Fabrication of carbon
nanotube reinforced aluminum composite by Powder Extrusion Process, Mater. Sci. Forum
534-536 (2007) 889-892
[5] T. Laha, Y. Liu, A. Agarwal, Carbon nanotube reinforced aluminum nano composite via
plasma and high velocity oxy-fuel spray forming, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 7 (2007) 1-10
[6] C. F. Deng, Z. Xuexi, M. A. Yanxia, W. Dezun, Fabrication of aluminum matrix
composite reinforced with carbon nanotubes, Rare Metals 26 (5) (2007) 450-455
[7] C. F. Deng, D. Z. Wang, X. X. Zhang, A. B. Li, Processing and properties of carbon
nanotubes reinforced aluminum composites, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 444 (2007) 138-145
[8] R. P. Bustamante, I. E. Guel, W. A.Flores, M. M. Yoshida, P. J. Ferreira, R. M. Sanchez,
Novel Al-matrix nano composites reinforced with multi-walled carbon nanotubes, J. Alloys
Compd. 450 (2008) 323-326
[9] H. J. Choi, G. B. Kwon, G. Y. Lee, D. H. Bae, Reinforcement with carbon nanotubes in
aluminum matrix composites, Scripta Mater. 59 (2008) 360-363
[10] D. K. Lim, T. Shibayanagi, A. P. Gerlich, Synthesis of multi-walled CNT reinforced
aluminum alloy composite via friction stir processing, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 507 (2009) 194-
199
[11] T. Laha, Y. Chen, D. Lahiri, A. Agarwal, Tensile properties of carbon nanotube
reinforced aluminum nanocomposite fabricated by plasma spray forming, Composites Part A
40 (2009) 589-594
Page 13 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
[12] A. M. K. Esawi, K. Morsi, A. Sayed, A. A. Gawad, P. Borah, Fabrication and properties
of dispersed carbon nanotube aluminum composites, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 508 (2009)167-173
[13] Q. Li, S. Fan, W. Han, C. Sun, W. Liang, Coating of carbon nanotube with nickel by
electroless plating method, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 36 (1997) L501-L503
[14] L. M. Ang, T. S. A. Hor, G. Q. Xu, C. H. Tung, S. Zhao, J. L. S. Wang, Electroless
plating of metals onto carbon nanotubes activated by a single-step activation method, Chem.
Mater. 11 (1999) 2115-2118
[15] L. M. Ang, T. S. A. Hor, G. Q. Xu, C. H. Tung, S. P. Zhao, J. L. S. Wang, Decoration of
activated carbon nanotubes with copper and nickel, Carbon 38 (2000) 363-372
[16] W. X. Chen, J. P. Tu, H.Y. Gan, Z. D. Xu, Q. G. Wang, J. Y. Lee, Z. L. Liu, X. B.
Zhang, Electroless preparation and tribological properties of Ni-P-Carbon nanotube
composite coatings under lubricated condition, Surf. Coat. Technol.160 (2002) 68-73
[17] W. X. Chen, J. P. Tu, L. Y. Wang, H. Y. Gan, Z. D. Xu, X. B. Zhang, Tribological
application of carbon nanotubes in a metal-based composite coating and composites, Carbon
41 (2003) 215-222
[18] W. X. Chen, J. P. Tu, Z. D. Xu, W. L. Chen, X. B. Zhang, D. H. Cheng, Tribological
properties of Ni-P-multi-walled carbon nanotubes electroless composite coating, Mater. Lett.
57 (2003) 1256-1260
[19] F. Deng, X. Chen, W. X. Chen, W. Li, Electroless plating Ni-P matrix composite coating
reinforced by carbon nanotubes, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 14 (4) (2004) 681-685
[20] Z. Yang, H. Xu, M. K. Li, Y. L. Shi, Y. Huang, H. L. Li, Preparation and properties of
Ni/P/single-walled carbon nanotubes composite coatings by means of electroless plating,
Thin Solid Films 466 (2004) 86-91
Page 14 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
[21] Z. Yang, H. Xu, Y. L. Shi, M. K. Li, Y. Huang, H. L. Li, The fabrication and corrosion
behavior of electroless Ni-P-carbon nanotube composite coatings, Mater. Res. Bull. 40
(2005) 1001-1009
[22] X. H. Chen, C. S. Chen, H. N. Xiao, H. B. Liu, L. P. Zhou, S. L. Li, G. Zhang, Dry
friction and wear characteristics of nickel/carbon nanotube electroless composite deposits,
Tribol. Int. 39 (2006) 22-28
[23] V. E. Amanda, S. James, W. Samuel, B. Ingham, Magnetic properties of electroless
nickel-phosphorus coated multi-walled carbon nanotubes, Carbon-Sci. Tech. 1 (2008) 18-23
[24] S. Arai, M. Kobayashi, T. Yamamoto, M. Endo, Pure-nickel-coated multiwalled carbon
nanotubes prepared by electroless deposition, Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 13 (12) (2010)
D94-D96
[25] C. Hao, X. Li, G. Wang, Magnetic alignment of nickel-coated carbon fibers, Mater. Res.
Bull. 46 (2011) 2090-2093
[26] K. Lin, W. Tsai, J. Chang, Decorating carbon nanotubes with Ni particles using an
electroless deposition technique for hydrogen storage applications, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
35 (2010) 7555-7562
[27] F. Z. Kong, X. B. Zhang, W. Q. Xiong, F. Liu, W. Z. Huang, Y. L. Sun, J. P. Tu, X. W.
Chen, Continuous Ni-layer on multiwall carbon nanotubes by an electroless plating method,
Surf. Coat. Technol. 155 (2002) 33-36
[28] C. Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics, Seventh ed., Wiley, New York, 1996
[29] H. R. Kodoma, A. E. Berkovitz, E. J. McNiffJr, S. Foner, Surface spin disorder in
NiFe2O4 nanoparticles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (2) (1996) 394-397
[30] S. Hu, T. Liu, D. Liu, S. Chen, Nano-Ferro sponges for controlled drug release, J.
Controlled Release 121 (2007) 181-189
Page 15 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
List of figure captions
Fig. 1. TEM images of raw soot and purified CNTs confirming the fewer defects in case of
purified CNTs when compared to raw soot CNTs
Fig. 2. XRD Pattern of Purified soot confirms the graphitic nature of CNTs (The peak
observed at 2 = 26.4̊)
Fig. 3. (a-b) Raman spectroscopy analysis of raw soot CNTs and Purified CNTs; the defect
intensity is less in purified soot compared with raw soot CNTs
Fig. 4. TGA curve of as synthesized CNTs showing that CNTs are stable up to 720 °C in
open air environments
Fig. 5. (a) SEM micrograph and 6 (b) corresponding EDS of sensitized and activated CNTs
shows the presence of Sn and Pd particles
Fig. 6. XRD pattern of EN coatings with various deposition times
Fig. 7. (a-b) Raman Spectrum of EN coated CNTs for various deposition times confirms the
increase in nickel deposition with increase in deposition time
Fig. 8. (a-d) TEM images of nickel coating for various deposition times. The nickel coating is
uniform throughout the length of CNTs for the deposition time of 60 min
Fig. 9. EDS Spectrum of electroless nickel coated CNTs for 30 min deposition time shows
the presence of nickel
Fig. 10. (a-f) TEM images of nickel coating for various deposition times. (a-b) 75 min, (c-d)
90 min, and (e-f) 120 min deposition times
Fig. 11. (a) M-H curve for nickel coated CNTs for deposition times of 30 and 60 min, (b)
enlarge of fig.11 (a)
Tables: Table1. Chemical composition of electroless bath used for nickel coating on CNTs
for various experiments
Page 16 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
Tables
Table1. Chemical composition of electroless bath used for nickel coating on CNTs for
various experiments
Chemical used in the electroless plating Concentration (g/l)
Nickel Sulphate 25
Nickel Chloride 25
Sodium Hypophosphate 25
Trisodium citrate 16
Lead Nitrate 1.5
CNTs used 1
Deposition times (in minutes): 10, 15, 20, 30, 45, 60,75,90,120
Page 17 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
Electroless Ni coatings have been performed on CNTs for various deposition times.
The deposition of nickel increased with increase in deposition time.
A deposition time of 60 min has been optimum for uniform coating of Ni on CNTs.
The CNTs with uniform coating of Ni are potential for reinforcements in composites.
Electroless nickel coatings are determined to be super paramagnetic behavior.
Page 18 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
Figure 1
Page 19 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
Figure 2
Page 20 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
Figure 3
Page 21 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
Figure 4
Page 22 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
Figure 5
Page 23 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
Figure 6
Page 24 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
Figure 7
Page 25 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
Figure 8
Page 26 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
Figure 9
Page 27 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
Figure 10
Page 28 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
Figure 11