ed103 ppt

21
Republic of the Philippines MINDANAO STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION Fatima, General Santos City Module 9: Grading and Reporting Practices Lesson 4: Common Grading-Related Problems Presented to: Dr. Ava Clare Marie O. Robles Class Schedule: MTH/10:30-12:00 Presented By: Eunice P. Do-ong Marjiana Maneged

Upload: eunice-do-ong

Post on 02-Jul-2015

278 views

Category:

Education


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Ed103 ppt

Republic of the Philippines

MINDANAO STATE UNIVERSITY

COLLEGE OF EDUCATION

Fatima, General Santos City

Module 9: Grading and Reporting Practices

Lesson 4: Common Grading-Related Problems

Presented to:Dr. Ava Clare Marie O. Robles

Class Schedule: MTH/10:30-12:00

Presented By:

Eunice P. Do-ong

Marjiana Maneged

Page 2: Ed103 ppt

Identify and define Common

Grading-Related Problems.

Know and understand its

causes and effects.

Identify some questionable

grading practices.

Enumerate the guidelines in

appropriate grading.

Page 3: Ed103 ppt

Grade Inflation

- a rise in the average grade

assigned to students; especially: the

assigning of grades higher than previously

assigned for given levels of achievement.

Page 4: Ed103 ppt

1.) Institutional pressure to retain students. 2.) Increased attention and sensitivity to personal crisis situations for

students.

3.) Higher grades used to obtain better student evaluations of teaching.4.) The increased use of subjective or motivational factors in grading.

5.) Changing grading policies and practices.6.) Faculty attitudes.

7.) Content deflation.8.) Changing mission.

Page 5: Ed103 ppt

- If there is grade inflation, or even if there are merely unwarranted perceptions that grade inflation is occurring, the currency of grades and awards becomes distrusted, and likewise the education system is distrusted(Yorke, 2007).

Page 6: Ed103 ppt

Some grading practices are clearly matters of opinion, no strong evidence confirms their value nor the harm they cause.

Due to their potentially harmful effects, it is imperative that we consider these practices openly and honestly in light of current evidences. Three practices that deserve special attention are as

follows:

1.) Averaging scores to determine a grade.2.) The use of zeros.3.) Lowering grades because of behavioral infractions.

Page 7: Ed103 ppt

Purpose of Grading:

To provide an accurate

description of what students

have learned.

Page 8: Ed103 ppt

1.) Give the most recent evidence.

Scores from assessments at the end of marking period are typically more indicative of what students have learned than those gathered fro the beginning.

Page 9: Ed103 ppt

2.) Give priority to the most comprehensive evidence.

If certain sources of evidence represent cumulative summaries of the knowledge and skills the students have acquired, these should hold the greatest weight in determining the students’ grades.

Page 10: Ed103 ppt

3.) Give priority to evidence related to the most important learning goals or standards.

Rank the evidence gathered in terms of its importance to the course’s learning goals and standards.

Page 11: Ed103 ppt

Most educators believe that a zero is not anaccurate reflection of the students’ learning, instead,zeroes are typically assigned to punish students for notdisplaying appropriate effort or responsibility. A singlezero has a profound effect when combined with thepractice of averaging as it drastically changes theaverage.

Page 12: Ed103 ppt

Lowering grades because of behavioral infractions

Behavioral infractions cannot be considered indicators of

achievement or performance since they do not reflect the

product criteria.

Page 13: Ed103 ppt

Grade inflation and questionable grading practices are the two common grading-related problems that causes the inappropriateness in assessing the student’s level of achievement. Averaging scores to determine a grade, the use of zeros and the lowering grades because of behavioral infractions are the reasons why grading practices becomes questionable. To make it appropriate, it is a must for a teacher to give priority to evidences that are most recent, most comprehensive and that relates to the most important learning goals and standards.

Page 14: Ed103 ppt

Yorke, Mantz (2007). Grading Student’s Achievement in Higher Education: Signals and Shortcomings, Corwin Press, Inc., California.

Guskey, Thomas R. and Bailey, J. (2001). Developing Grading and Reporting Systems for Student Learning. Corwin Press, Inc., California.

Reganit, Arnulfo, Elicay, Ronaldo, & Laguerta, Cresenciana(2010). Assessment of Student Learning 1 (Cognitive Learning) C & E Publishing, Inc.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/grade%20inflation

http://www.mnsu.edu/cetl/teachingresources/articles/gradeinflation.html

Page 15: Ed103 ppt

THANK YOU and GOD BLESS!!!

Page 16: Ed103 ppt
Page 17: Ed103 ppt
Page 18: Ed103 ppt
Page 19: Ed103 ppt
Page 20: Ed103 ppt
Page 21: Ed103 ppt