ecosystem services for agriculture - sai platform · ecosystem services for agriculture. an initial...

22
Ecosystem Services for Agriculture An Initial Dialogue December, 2010 World Resources Institute

Upload: lediep

Post on 11-May-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Ecosystem Services for Agriculture - SAI Platform · Ecosystem Services for Agriculture. An Initial Dialogue. December, 2010. World Resources Institute. World Resources Institute

World Resources Institute

Ecosystem Services for Agriculture

An Initial DialogueDecember, 2010

World Resources Institute

Page 2: Ecosystem Services for Agriculture - SAI Platform · Ecosystem Services for Agriculture. An Initial Dialogue. December, 2010. World Resources Institute. World Resources Institute

World Resources Institute

Agenda

1:30 Welcome and introductions

1:45 Ecosystem services – the big picture

1:55 Ecosystem services & agriculture

2:00 Gap analysis

2:30 Candidate activities

3:00 Next steps

Page 3: Ecosystem Services for Agriculture - SAI Platform · Ecosystem Services for Agriculture. An Initial Dialogue. December, 2010. World Resources Institute. World Resources Institute

World Resources Institute

Biodiversity & ecosystem services (BES)

Biodiversity

Erosion control Water purification Maintenance of soil qualityPest mitigation PollinationNatural hazard mitigationEtc.

Cultural/Ethical

Page 4: Ecosystem Services for Agriculture - SAI Platform · Ecosystem Services for Agriculture. An Initial Dialogue. December, 2010. World Resources Institute. World Resources Institute

World Resources Institute

RegulatingBenefits obtained from

control of natural processes by ecosystems

CulturalNonmaterial benefits

obtained from ecosystems

ProvisioningGoods or products

obtained from ecosystems

Ecosystem services

Page 5: Ecosystem Services for Agriculture - SAI Platform · Ecosystem Services for Agriculture. An Initial Dialogue. December, 2010. World Resources Institute. World Resources Institute

World Resources Institute

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Findings Degraded Mixed Enhanced

Provisioning • Capture fisheries• Wild foods• Biomass fuel• Freshwater• Genetic resources• Biochemicals, natural medicines,

and pharmaceuticals

Timber and other wood fiberOther fibers (e.g., cotton, hemp, silk)

CropsLivestockAquaculture

Regulating • Air quality (e.g., chemicals) • Local climate (e.g.,

temperature)• Erosion control• Water purification and waste

treatment• Pest regulation• Pollination• Natural hazard

Water timing and flows Soil quality Disease

Global climate (GHG sequestration)

Cultural • Ethical values (spiritual, religious)• Aesthetic values• Education

Recreation and ecotourism

Source: Adapted from the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.

Page 6: Ecosystem Services for Agriculture - SAI Platform · Ecosystem Services for Agriculture. An Initial Dialogue. December, 2010. World Resources Institute. World Resources Institute

World Resources Institute

Long term utility of ecosystem services

Adaptationto climate change

Natural hazard risk

Payments, markets & incentives

Regulations • Air• Land • Water

ES metrics & science

• Ecosystem functions• Dependence • Flows to people • Tradeoffs• Multiple scales

Landscape restoration

Landscape management

Page 7: Ecosystem Services for Agriculture - SAI Platform · Ecosystem Services for Agriculture. An Initial Dialogue. December, 2010. World Resources Institute. World Resources Institute

World Resources Institute

Ecosystem services and agriculture

• Erosion control • Water purification • Soil quality• Pest mitigation • Pollination• Flood control• Etc.

• Water quantity • Water quality• GHG seq. • Pollination• Flood control• Etc.

MANAGEMENT GOALS• NRCS/cost share (CEAP)• Markets (e.g., nutrient, carbon)• Supply chain development • Grower outreach (Gates)

Page 8: Ecosystem Services for Agriculture - SAI Platform · Ecosystem Services for Agriculture. An Initial Dialogue. December, 2010. World Resources Institute. World Resources Institute

World Resources Institute

Ecosystem services FtM TSCGHG Sequestration Yes Yes

Water quantity Yes Yes

Water quality Yes Yes

Water timing & flows

Water purification (stormwater)

Erosion control Yes

Soil Quality

Pest regulation

Pollination

Natural hazards (e.g., flood)

Local climate (temperature)

Air quality

Cultural/ethical values ? ?

Dependence on ES

Gap analysis

Page 9: Ecosystem Services for Agriculture - SAI Platform · Ecosystem Services for Agriculture. An Initial Dialogue. December, 2010. World Resources Institute. World Resources Institute

World Resources Institute

Landscape planning

Page 10: Ecosystem Services for Agriculture - SAI Platform · Ecosystem Services for Agriculture. An Initial Dialogue. December, 2010. World Resources Institute. World Resources Institute

World Resources Institute

Site level analysis

Page 11: Ecosystem Services for Agriculture - SAI Platform · Ecosystem Services for Agriculture. An Initial Dialogue. December, 2010. World Resources Institute. World Resources Institute

World Resources Institute

Water stress index & dependence

Page 12: Ecosystem Services for Agriculture - SAI Platform · Ecosystem Services for Agriculture. An Initial Dialogue. December, 2010. World Resources Institute. World Resources Institute

World Resources Institute

Freshwater in LCA

Source: Ridoutt, B. et al. “Water footprinting at the production brand level: case study and future challenges.” Journal of Cleaner Production 17 (2009) 1228-1235.

Page 13: Ecosystem Services for Agriculture - SAI Platform · Ecosystem Services for Agriculture. An Initial Dialogue. December, 2010. World Resources Institute. World Resources Institute

World Resources Institute

Water markets currently in operation

KeyStates with high-activity trading markets

States with low-activity trading markets (due to lack of driver)

States with low-activity trading markets (due to recent development)

Grassland Area Farmers Tradable Loads Program

Long Island Sound

Middle Snake River

Minnesota River Basin

Rahr Malting

Southern Minnesota Beet Sugar Cooperative

Bear Creek

Chatfield Reservoir

Cherry Creek BasinLake Dillon

Lower Boise*

Neuse River

Tar-Pamlico

Red Cedar River

* Note: The Lower Boise Program is low-activity due to lack of driver.

Great MiamiSugar Creek

Tualatin River

Pennsylvania Program

Virginia Program

Source: Water Quality Trading: An Overview of Current Programs, World Resources Institute (forthcoming).

Page 14: Ecosystem Services for Agriculture - SAI Platform · Ecosystem Services for Agriculture. An Initial Dialogue. December, 2010. World Resources Institute. World Resources Institute

World Resources Institute

Portland Tradable Stormwater Program

Source: Water Quality Trading: An Overview of Current Programs, World Resources Institute (forthcoming).

San Francisco Bay

Lower Colorado River

Florida Ranchlands Environmental Services Project

Lake Allatoona

Charles River

Maryland Program

Vermillion River

Cape Fear

Passaic RiverLake Tahoe

Shepherd CreekUpper Little Miami

Willamette Partnership

West Virginia Upper Potomac

Water markets in development

Page 15: Ecosystem Services for Agriculture - SAI Platform · Ecosystem Services for Agriculture. An Initial Dialogue. December, 2010. World Resources Institute. World Resources Institute

World Resources Institute

Ecosystem services for LCAs

• Input-output/economic model

• Ecosystem Services Damage Potential

• Satellite analysis

• Landscape and site metrics

Page 16: Ecosystem Services for Agriculture - SAI Platform · Ecosystem Services for Agriculture. An Initial Dialogue. December, 2010. World Resources Institute. World Resources Institute

World Resources Institute

Candidate activities

1. Explore • Dialogues, discussions, write issue briefs

2. Develop impact categories, metrics, methods • Integrate TSC, FtM, others

3. Road test

4. Advance market/payments/incentives • “Satellite” engagement (along chain)• Develop schemes

Page 17: Ecosystem Services for Agriculture - SAI Platform · Ecosystem Services for Agriculture. An Initial Dialogue. December, 2010. World Resources Institute. World Resources Institute

World Resources Institute

For more information: www.wri.org/ecosystems

John Finisdore+1 202 729-7897

[email protected]

Page 18: Ecosystem Services for Agriculture - SAI Platform · Ecosystem Services for Agriculture. An Initial Dialogue. December, 2010. World Resources Institute. World Resources Institute

World Resources Institute

Mixed Forest

Evergreen Needleleaf Forest

Evegreen Broadleaf Forest

Deciduous Needleleaf Forest

Deciduous Broadleaf Forest

Savanna

Shrubland/Grassland

Shrubland

Grassland

Cropland/Woodland

Cropland/Grassland

Irrigated Cropland

Dry Cropland & Pasture

Target States: Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala, Tamil Nadu

Step 1. Scope: Southern India

Page 19: Ecosystem Services for Agriculture - SAI Platform · Ecosystem Services for Agriculture. An Initial Dialogue. December, 2010. World Resources Institute. World Resources Institute

World Resources Institute

Microsoft Office xcel 97-2003 Workshe

Page 20: Ecosystem Services for Agriculture - SAI Platform · Ecosystem Services for Agriculture. An Initial Dialogue. December, 2010. World Resources Institute. World Resources Institute

World Resources Institute

Expected change in number of rainy days (IPCC A2) Expected change in rainy intensity (mm/day) (IPCC A2)

Step 3. Trends analysis – Freshwater

Page 21: Ecosystem Services for Agriculture - SAI Platform · Ecosystem Services for Agriculture. An Initial Dialogue. December, 2010. World Resources Institute. World Resources Institute

World Resources Institute

Average daily flow storage capacity by basin

Source: Briscoe, John 2006. “Water: Bracing for a Turbulent Future,” World Bank, October, 2005, Washington, DC

Step 3. Trends analysis – Water regulation

Page 22: Ecosystem Services for Agriculture - SAI Platform · Ecosystem Services for Agriculture. An Initial Dialogue. December, 2010. World Resources Institute. World Resources Institute

World Resources Institute

Case Example: Akzo Nobel

0.2

1.0

1.80.21.01.8

Costs/Price (normalized)

Env

iron

men

tal F

ootp

rint

(nor

mal

ized

)

high eco-efficiency

low eco-efficiency

Energy

Natural resources

Land use

Emissions

Toxicity

Risk

Production Distribution SAR Profit