ecen 615 methods of electric power systems analysis...

29
Lecture 9: Advanced Power Flow, Gaussian Elimination, Sparse Systems ECEN 615 Methods of Electric Power Systems Analysis Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering Texas A&M University [email protected]

Upload: others

Post on 21-Oct-2020

8 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Lecture 9: Advanced Power Flow, Gaussian

    Elimination, Sparse Systems

    ECEN 615Methods of Electric Power Systems Analysis

    Prof. Tom Overbye

    Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering

    Texas A&M University

    [email protected]

    mailto:[email protected]

  • Announcements

    • Read Chapter 6

    • Homework 2 is due on Sept 27

    2

  • Area Interchange Example: Seven Bus, Three Area System

    3PowerWorld Case: B7Flat

  • Example Large System Areas

    4

    1

    101

    102

    103

    104105

    106

    107

    201

    202

    205

    206

    207

    208

    209

    210

    212

    215

    216

    217

    218

    219

    222

    225

    226

    227

    228229

    230

    231

    232

    233

    234

    235

    236 237

    295

    296

    314

    320

    327

    330

    332

    333

    340

    341

    342

    343

    344

    345

    346

    347

    349

    350

    351

    352

    353

    354

    355

    356

    357

    360

    361

    362

    363364

    365

    366

    401

    402

    403

    404

    405

    406

    407

    409

    410

    411

    412

    415

    416

    417

    418

    419

    421

    426

    427

    428

    433

    436

    438

    502

    503

    504

    515

    520

    523

    524

    525

    526

    527

    531

    534

    536

    540541

    542

    544

    545

    546

    600

    608

    613

    615

    620

    627

    633

    635

    640

    645

    650

    652

    661

    667

    672

    680

    694

    696

    697

    698

    998

    999

    Each oval

    corresponds to a

    power flow area

    with the size

    proportional to

    the area’s

    generation

  • Generator Volt/Reactive Control

    • Simplest situation is a single generator at a bus

    regulating its own terminal

    • Either PV, modeled as a voltage magnitude constraint, or as a

    PQ with reactive power fixed at a limit value. If PQ the

    reactive power limits can vary with the generator MW output

    • Next simplest is multiple generators at a bus. Obviously

    they need to be regulating the bus to the same voltage

    magnitude

    • From a power flow solution perspective, it is similar to a single

    generator, with limits being the total of the individual units

    • Options for allocation of vars among generators; this can affect

    the transient stability results

    5

  • Generator Volt/Reactive Control

    6

    Case is Aggieland37_

    Gen_VoltVar

  • Generator Volt/Reactive Control

    • Next complication is generators at a single bus

    regulating a remote bus; usually this is the high side of

    their generator step-up (GSU) transformer

    • When multiple generators regulate a single point their exciters

    need to have a dual input

    • This can be implemented in the power flow for the generators

    at bus j regulating the voltage at bus k by changing the bus j

    voltage constraint equation to be

    (however, this does create a zero on the diagonal of the

    Jacobian)

    • Helps with power system voltage stability 7

    , 0k k setV V

  • Generator Volt/Reactive Control

    • The next complication is to have the generators at

    multiple buses doing coordinated voltage control

    • Controlled bus may or may not be one of the terminal buses

    • There must be an a priori decision about how much

    reactive power is supplied by each bus; example

    allocations are a fixed percentage or placing all

    generators at the same place in their regulation range

    • Implemented by designating one bus as the master; this

    bus models the voltage constraint

    • All other buses are treated as PQ, with the equation

    including a percent of the total reactive power output of

    all the controlling bus generators 8

  • Remote and Coordinated Var Control Example

    9

    GIGEM69

    KYLE69

    KYLE138

    WEB138

    WEB69

    BONFIRE69

    FISH69

    RING69

    TREE69

    CENTURY69

    REVEILLE69MAROON69

    SPIRIT69

    YELL69

    RELLIS69

    WHITE138

    RELLIS138

    BUSH69

    MSC69

    RUDDER69

    HULLABALOO138

    REED69

    REED138

    AGGIE138 AGGIE345

    16%A

    MVA

    33%A

    MVA

    78%A

    MVA

    78%A

    MVA

    18%A

    MVA

    55%A

    MVA

    14%A

    MVA

    54%A

    MVA

    60%A

    MVA

    16%A

    MVA

    49%A

    MVA

    49%A

    MVA

    45%A

    MVA

    50%A

    MVA

    49%A

    MVA

    49%A

    MVA

    35%A

    MVA

    A

    MVA

    57%A

    MVA

    45%A

    MVA

    A

    MVA

    72%A

    MVA

    75%A

    MVA

    33%A

    MVA

    68%A

    MVA

    33%A

    MVA

    39%A

    MVA

    68%A

    MVA

    68%A

    MVA

    22%A

    MVA

    A

    MVA

    19%A

    MVA

    52%A

    MVA

    57%A

    MVA

    39%A

    MVA

    63%A

    MVA

    70%A

    MVA

    70%A

    MVA

    0.97 pu

    0.945 pu0.98 pu

    0.96 pu

    0.982 pu

    0.97 pu

    0.950 pu

    0.972 pu0.97 pu

    0.98 pu

    1.000 pu

    1.01 pu

    0.993 pu

    0.992 pu

    0.975 pu0.98 pu

    0.96 pu

    0.96 pu 0.95 pu

    0.981 pu

    0.976 pu0.96 pu

    1.01 pu1.03 pu

    PLUM138

    1.01 pu

    14%A

    MVA

    0.97 pu

    61%A

    MVA

    34 MW

    0 Mvar

    59 MW

    17 Mvar

    20 MW

    8 Mvar

    100 MW

    30 Mvar

    61 MW 17 Mvar

    59 MW

    6 Mvar

    69 MW

    0 Mvar

    93 MW

    58 Mvar

    58 MW

    17 Mvar

    36 MW

    24 Mvar

    96 MW

    20 Mvar

    93 MW

    65 Mvar 82 MW

    27 Mvar

    0.0 Mvar

    35 MW

    11 Mvar

    25 MW

    10 Mvar

    38 MW 10 Mvar

    22 MW

    0 Mvar

    0.0 Mvar

    0.0 Mvar

    0.0 Mvar

    0.0 Mvar

    0.0 Mvar

    0.0 Mvar

    31 MW

    13 Mvar

    49 MW

    17 Mvar

    deg 0

    tap1.0875

    tap1.0000

    tap1.0213tap1.0213

    3.4 Mvar

    52.8 Mvar

    pu 1.031

    pu 0.993 10.0 Mvar

    20.4 Mvar

    39.2 Mvar

    95%A

    MVA

    Each oval

    corresponds to a

    power flow area

    with the size

    proportional to

    the area’s

    generation

  • Model Complexity Examples

    • A recent 76,000 bus Eastern Interconnect (EI) power

    flow model has voltage magnitudes controlled at about

    19,000 buses (by Gens, LTCs, switched shunts) 94%

    regulate their own terminals with about 1100 doing

    remote regulation. Of this group 572 are regulated by

    two or more devices, 277 by three or more, 12 by eight

    or more, and three by 12 devices!

    • It also has 27,622 transformers with 98 phase shifters

    • Impedance correction tables are used for 351, including about

    2/3 of the phase shifters; tables can change the impedance by

    more than two times

    10

  • PV Bus Voltage Droop

    • Traditionally the PV bus approach considered either 1)

    on control at setpoint or 2) at a limit

    • Increasingly this is no longer the case, particularly for

    wind and solar. Rather regulation has a droop

    11

  • PV Bus Voltage Droop

    • This actually allows for multiple generators to regulate

    a single remote bus using different characteristics

    12

    B2

    RegBus

    Generators are

    all configured to

    regulate the

    RegBus

    B3

    B1

    A2

    A3

    A1

    “Arriving

    Branches”

  • PV Droop Implementation

    • PowerWorld just implemented this using a voltage

    droop control object

    13

  • B7Flat Example with PV Deadband

    14

    Case is B7Flat_PVDroop

    Research opportunity with the synthetic models to discuss

    the impact of deadbands on, say, voltage stability

  • Example of Hourly Voltage Variation Over Time

    15

  • Power Flow Topology Processing

    • Commercial power flow software must have

    algorithms to determine the number of asynchronous,

    interconnected systems in the model

    • These separate systems are known as Islands

    • In large system models such as the Eastern Interconnect it is

    common to have multiple islands in the base case (one recent

    EI model had nine islands)

    • Islands can also form unexpectedly as a result of

    contingencies

    • Power can be transferred between islands using dc lines

    • Each island must have a slack bus

    16

  • Power Flow Topology Processing

    • Anytime a status change occurs the power flow

    must perform topology processing to determine

    whether there are either 1) new islands or 2) islands

    have merged

    • Determination is needed to determine whether the

    island is “viable.” That is, could it truly function as

    an independent system, or should the buses just be

    marked as dead

    • A quite common occurrence is when a single load or

    generator is isolated; in the case of a load it can be

    immediately killed; generators are more tricky

    17

  • Topology Processing Algorithm

    • Since topology processing is performed often, it must

    be quick (order n ln(n))!

    • Simple, yet quick topology processing algoritm

    • Set all buses as being in their own island (equal to bus

    number)

    • Set ChangeInIslandStatus true

    • While ChangeInIslandStatus Do

    • Go through all the in-service lines, setting the islands for each of the

    buses to be the smaller island number; if the island numbers are

    different set ChangeInIslandStatus true

    • Determine which islands are viable, assigning a slack bus as

    necessary

    18

  • Example of Island Formation

    19

    Top Area Cost

    Left Area Cost Right Area Cost slack

    1.00 pu

    1.01 pu

    1.04 pu1.04 pu

    1.04 pu

    0.99 pu1.05 pu

    A

    MVA

    A

    MVA

    A

    MVA

    A

    MVA

    A

    MVA

    A

    MVA

    A

    MVA

    A

    MVA

    A

    MVA

    62 MW

    61 MW

    44 MW 42 MW 31 MW 31 MW

    38 MW

    37 MW

    80 MW 78 MW

    32 MW

    33 MW

    14 MW

    38 MW

    39 MW 20 MW 21 MW

    42 MW

    41 MW

    A

    MVA

    21 MW 20 MW

    8078 $/h

    4652 $/h 4189 $/h

    Case Hourly Cost 16919 $/h

    Bus 1 Bus 3 Bus 4

    Bus 2 Bus 5

    Bus 6 Bus 7

    MW106

    MW171

    MW200 MW198

    110 MW

    40 Mvar

    80 MW 30 Mvar

    130 MW 40 Mvar

    40 MW

    20 Mvar

    MW 94

    200 MW

    0 Mvar200 MW

    0 Mvar

    AGC ON

    AGC ON

    AGC ON

    AGC ON

    AGC ON

    80%A

    MVA

    Splitting large systems requires a careful consideration

    of the flow on the island tie-lines as they are opened

  • Bus Branch versus Node Breaker

    • Due to a variety of issues during the 1970’s and 1980’s

    the real-time operations and planning stages of power

    systems adopted different modeling approaches

    20

    PlanningUse simplified bus/branch model

    PC approach

    Use of files

    Stand-alone applications

    Real-Time OperationsUse detailed node/breaker model

    EMS system as a set of integrated applications and processes

    Real-time operating system

    Real-time databases

    Entire data sets and software tools developed around

    these two distinct power system models

  • Circuit Breakers and Disconnects

    • Circuit breakers are devices that are designed to clear

    fault current, which can be many times normal

    operating current

    • AC circuit breakers take advantage of the current going

    through zero twice per cycle

    • Transmission faults can usually be cleared in less than three

    cycles

    • Disconnects cannot clear fault current, and usually not

    normal current. They provide a visual indication the

    line is open. Can be manual or motorized.

    • In the power flow they have essentially no impedance;

    concept of a zero branch reactance (ZBR)21

  • Google View of a 345 kV Substation

    22

  • Substation Configurations

    • Several different substation breaker/disconnect

    configurations are common:

    • Single bus: simple but a fault

    any where requires taking out the

    entire substation; also doing breaker

    or disconnect maintenance requires

    taking out the associated line

    23Source: http://www.skm-eleksys.com/2011/09/substation-bus-schemes.html

    http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-9g6rjqRAD0I/ToXk6oQSRUI/AAAAAAAAApY/-4th5mJTvDY/s1600/SingleBus.png

  • Substation Configurations, cont.

    • Main and Transfer Bus:

    Now the breakers can be taken

    out for maintenance without

    taking out a line, but protection

    is more difficult, and a fault

    on one line will take out at least two

    • Double Bus Breaker:

    Now each line is fully protected

    when a breaker is out, so high

    reliability, but more costly

    24Source: http://www.skm-eleksys.com/2011/09/substation-bus-schemes.html

    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-yBG8xB2VDog/ToXlwGl-CbI/AAAAAAAAApc/4v4fTK9Ixbc/s1600/MainandTransferBus.pnghttp://3.bp.blogspot.com/-9Se44Ew3i_c/ToXmQZRcZzI/AAAAAAAAApg/al1E7kRV1L0/s1600/DoubleBusDoubleBreaker.png

  • Ring Bus, Breaker and Half

    • As the name implies with a ring

    bus the breakers form a ring;

    number of breakers is same as

    number of devices; any breaker can

    be removed for maintenance

    • The breaker and half has two buses

    and uses three breakers for two

    devices; both breakers and buses

    can be removed for maintenance

    25Source: http://www.skm-eleksys.com/2011/09/substation-bus-schemes.html

  • • EMS Model

    – Used for real-time operations

    – Called full topology model

    – Has node-breaker detail

    • Planning Model

    – Used for off-line analysis

    – Called consolidated model

    by PowerWorld

    – Has bus/branch detail

    EMS and Planning Models

    50 MW

    20 Mvar

    -30 MW

    -18 Mvar

    -40 MW

    -10 Mvar

    10 MW

    3 Mvar10 MW

    5 Mvar

    -30 MW

    -18 Mvar

    -40 MW

    -10 Mvar

    10 MW

    3 Mvar

    10 MW

    5 Mvar

    26

  • Node-Breaker Consolidation

    • One approach to modeling systems with large numbers

    of ZBRs (zero branch reactances, such as from circuit

    breakers) is to just assume a small reactance and solve

    – This results in lots of buses and branches, resulting in a much

    larger problem

    – This can cause numerical problems in the solution

    • The alterative is to consolidate the nodes that are

    connected by ZBRs into a smaller number of buses

    – After solution all nodes have the same voltage; use logic to

    determine the device flows

    27

  • Node-Breaker Example

    28

    Case name is FT_11Node. PowerWorld consolidates

    nodes (buses) into super buses; available in the Model

    Explorer: Solution, Details, Superbuses

  • Node-Breaker Example

    Note there is ambiguity on how much power is flowing

    in each device in the ring bus (assuming each device

    really has essentially no impedance)29