eceg105 optics for engineers course notes part 7: diffraction
TRANSCRIPT
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 11270-07-1
ECEG105Optics for Engineers
Course NotesPart 7: Diffraction
Prof. Charles A. DiMarzioNortheastern University
Fall 2007
August 2007
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 11270-07-2
Diffraction Overview• General Equations
• Fraunhofer – Fourier Optics– Special Cases– Image Resolution– Diffraction
Gratings
– Acousto-Optical Modulators
• Fresnel– Cornu Spiral– Circular
Apertures
• Summary
It's All About λ/D
August 2007
?λ/D
D
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 11270-07-3
Difraction: Quantum Approach
• Uncertainty
• Photon Momentum
• Uncertainty in p
ΔxΔp≥h
Δk x≥2πΔx
p=h
2πk
• Angle of Flight
• For a Better Result– Use Exact PDF– Gaussian is best
• Satisfies the equality• Minimum-uncertainty
wavepacket
sin θ =k x
k
Δsin θ =2πΔxk
=2πλΔx2π
=λΔx
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 11270-07-4
Quantum Diffraction Examples
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 16
4
2
0
2
4
6
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 16
4
2
0
2
4
6
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 16
4
2
0
2
4
6
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 16
4
2
0
2
4
6
200 Random Paths
Aperture1 λ
Aperture2 λ
Aperture5 λ
Aperture10 λ
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 11270-07-5
Maxwell’s Eqs & Diffraction
∇×E=−∂B∂t
z
x
y
z-component of curl is zero
y-component of curl is zerox-component is not
E in y direction, B in -x directionPropagation in z direction
zx
y
z-component of curl is not zeroif E changes in x direction
Now, B has a z component, soPropagation is along both z and x
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 11270-07-6
Summary of Diffraction Math
Maxwell’sEquations
HelmholtzEquation
Green’sTheorem
KirchoffIntegralTheorem
Fresnel-KirchoffIntegralFormula
FresnelDiffraction
Fourier Transforms
HankelTransforms
MieScattering
YeeNumericalMethods
All ScalarWaveProblems
Spheres
Scalar Fields
GeneralProblems
FieldsFar FromAperture
r>>λ
Obliquity=2,ParaxialApproximation
ShadowsandZonePlates
x,ySeparableProblems
CircularApertures
FraunhoferConditions
PolarSymmetry
“SimpleSystems”
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 11270-07-7
Kirchoff Integral Theorem (1)
• General Wave Probs.– Solve Maxwell's
Eqs.– Use Boundary
Conditions– Hard or Impossible
• Kirchoff Integral Approach– Algorithmic– Correct (Almost)
• Based on Maxwell's Equations
• Scalar Fields– Complete
• Amplitude and Phase
– Amenable to Approximation
– Comp. Efficient?– Intuitive
• Similar to Huygens
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 11270-07-8
Kirchoff Integral Theorem (2)
• The Idea– Consider Point of
Interest– Correlate Wavefronts
• “Best Wavefront”– Converging
Uniform Spherical Wave
• Actual Wavefront
• The Mathematics– Start with Converging
Spherical Wave
– Green's Theorem– Helmholtz Equation
• Ties to Maxwell's Equations (Scalar Field)
– Various Approximations– Numerical Techniques
• Results– Fresnel Diffraction– Fraunhofer Diffraction
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 11270-07-9
Kirchoff Integral Setup
P
Surface A0
Surface A
The Goal: A Green’s FunctionApproach.
U x,y,z =∫G x,y,z,x1 ,y1 ,z1 U x1 ,y1 ,z1 dV1
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 11270-07-10
Kirchoff Integral Thm. Solution
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 11270-07-11
Helmholtz-Kirchoff Integral
P
Surface A0
Surface A
P
Surface A
r’ r
n
A0
U=U0eikr'
r
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 11270-07-12
H-K Integral Approximations
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 11270-07-13
Some Approximations
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 11270-07-14
Paraxial Approximationx1 x
z
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 11270-07-15
Integral Expressions
(Hankel Transform)
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 11270-07-16
Fraunhofer and Fresnel
z
z
• Fraunhofer works– in far field or– at focus.
• Fresnel works– everywhere else.– For example, it
predicts effects at edges of shadows.
August 2007
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 11270-07-17
Fraunhofer Diffraction• Equations
• A Hint of Fourier Optics
• Numerical Computations
• Special Cases (Gaussian, Uniform)
• Imaging
• Brief Comment on SM and MM Fibers
• Gratings
• Brief Comment on Acousto-Optics
August 2007
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 11270-07-18
Fraunhofer Diffraction (1)
Very ImportantParameter
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 11270-07-19
Fraunhofer Diffraction (2)
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 11270-07-20
Fraunhofer Lens (1)
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 11270-07-21
Fraunhofer Lens (2)
z
z
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 11270-07-22
Fraunhofer Diffraction Summary
z
z
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 11270-07-23
Numerical Computation (1)
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 11270-07-24
Numerical Computation (2)
• Quadratic Phase of Integrand
– Near Focus (z=f): Not a problem
– Otherwise
• Many cycles in integrating over aperture
• Contributions tend to cancel, so
• roundoff error becomes significant
• but geometric optics is pretty good here,– except at edges.– We will approach this problem later.
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 11270-07-25
Circular Aperture, Uniform Field
D
h
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 11270-07-26
Square Aperture, Uniform Field
z
D
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 11270-07-27
No Aperture, Gaussian Field
D
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 11270-07-28
Fraunhoffer Examples
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 11270-07-29
Imaging: Rayleigh Criterion
R/d0 is f#
August 2007
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 11270-07-30
Single-Mode Optical Fiber
Beam too Large(lost power at edges)
Beam too Small(lost power through cladding)
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 11270-07-31
Diffraction Grating
θi
θd
ReflectionExample
d
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 11270-07-32
Grating Equation
100 0 100 2001
0.5
0
0.5
1sin(θd)
sin(θi)
degrees
-sin(θi) n=0
-1
-2
12
3
4
5
-3ReflectedOrders
TransmittedOrders
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 11270-07-33
Grating Fourier AnalysisGrating Diffraction Pattern
Slit
Convolve
Sinc
Multiply
Repetition Pattern
Multiply Convolve
Apodization
Result
Result
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 11270-07-34
Grating for Laser Tuning
f
Gain
f
Cavity Modes
θi
August 2007
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 11270-07-35
Monochrometer
θi
sinθ
n=1 n=2 n=3
Aliasing
August 2007
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 11270-07-36
Acousto-Optical Modulator
Absorber
Sound Source
• Acoustic Wave:
– Sinusoidal Grating
• Wavefronts as Moving Mirrors
– Signal Enhancement
– Doppler Shift• Acoustic
Frequency Multiplied by Order
August 2007
More Rigorous Analysis is Possible but Somewhat Complicated
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 11270-07-37
Fresnel Diffraction
• Fraunhofer Diffraction Assumed:– Obliquity = 2– Paraxial Approximation– At focus or at far field
• Relax the Last Assumption– More Complicated Integrals– Describe Fringes at edges of shadows
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 11270-07-38
Rectangular Aperture
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 11270-07-39
Cornu Spiral
C(u), Fresnel Cosine Integral
S(u
), F
resn
el
Sin
e I
nte
gra
l
0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.80.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
-5<u<5
u=0
u=1u=2
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 11270-07-40
Using the Cornu Spiral
C(u), Fresnel Cosine Integral
S(u
), F
resn
el
Sin
e I
nte
gra
l
0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.80.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
a=1
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 11270-07-41
Small Aperture
0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.80.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
6 4 2 0 2 4 6 83
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
λ=500 nm, 2a=100µm, z=5m.Fraunhofer Diffraction would have worked here.
position, mm
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 11270-07-42
Large Aperture
0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.80.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
0.02 0.015 0.01 0.005 0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.0250
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
λ=500 nm, 2a=1mm, z=5m.
position, m
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 11270-07-43
Circular Aperture
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 51
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 51
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
FresnelCosineIntegrand
Outputof FresnelZonePlate
kr/2z
kr/2z
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 11270-07-44
Phase in Pupil (1)
Linear PhaseShift is tilt
φ
D/2
Quadratic PhaseShift is focus
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 11270-07-45
Phase in Pupil (2)
Quartic Phaseis SphericalAberration
Fresnel Lens has wrapped quadraticphase
Atmoshperic Turbulencecan be modeled as randomphase in the pupil plane
July 2003 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University 11270-07-46
Summary of Diffraction Math
Maxwell’sEquations
HelmholtzEquation
Green’sTheorem
KirchoffIntegralTheorem
Fresnel-KirchoffIntegralFormula
FresnelDiffraction
Fourier Transforms
HankelTransforms
MieScattering
YeeNumericalMethods
All ScalarWaveProblems
Spheres
Scalar Fields
GeneralProblems
FieldsFar FromAperture
r>>λ
Obliquity=2,ParaxialApproximation
ShadowsandZonePlates
SeparableProblems
CircularApertures
FraunhoferConditions
PolarSymmetry
“SimpleSystems”