eCampus webmøter diskusjonsnotat

http://blog.ecampus.no/

Jan Meijer21 April 2010

eCampus arbeidsgruppemøtephoto by Henrik Thorburn

eCampusgoal

3 scenarios

different needs, different toolsmeetings lecture ad hoc collab

Use staff meetings net-based teaching study group, project meetings, askeskymøter

User group staff lecturer, students everyone

# Participants 5-10, max 20 15-40, max 100 2-7, max 20

Equipment control yes no none, heterogeneous

Collab duration permanent semester day/short/project

Planning horizon days, months medium

weeks, semesterlong

day/projectshort

User’s platform MS MS, Mac, Mobile?, Linux?

MS, Mac(++), Mobile?, Linux

Current use some some courses little systematic use

many roads to salvation

AdobeConnect

GoTo MeetingNefsis

DimDim

Elluminate

Tandberg Movi

Microsoft OCS

NTR MeetingWebEx

BeamYourScreenMegaMeeting ?

AviCom

13:00

Friday, 16 April 2010

3 5 20 50 100+

Adobe Acrobat.com

free $149* $390

DimDim free** $300 $900 (1000)

NTRmeeting 3590 4490 7050 8490 (100)

Skype free free free free

* $149 = NOK 889 **with less functionality

prices are annual

use our rooms?

• Adobe Connect (20)• DimDim (50)• NTRmeeting (50)

ecampus-intern@uninett.noring Ingrid, Jan, Magnus

What to do?

thought 1: It’s there!

teach, train, change mentality

GET IT USED

The challenge is NOT technological

thought 2: It could be better

300.000 room admins?Feide login?

Take out recordings?

STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP

what do YOU think?

• the previous?

• the assumptions?• the open questions?• the sketched options?

the suggested next steps?

Open questions (1)• Q1: Who’s currently using what?• Q2: Who’s investigating?• Q3: When? Fall 2010? December 2010? • Q4: Scenarios correct?• Q5: Assumptions

– a) Platform support importance: • MS, Mac, Linux?, Mobile platforms?

– b) Good enough beats tight integration?– c) Meetings initiated from within institution?– d) Outside persons MUST be able to join

• Q6: Other assumptions correct?

Open questions (2)

• Q7: How many rooms needed?• Q8: Logical intervals for Max.

#attendees/room• Q9: Which licensing model is realistic?

– # rooms?– # rooms + #max users/room?– # concurrent users?

Possible options• Do nothing• Increase competence and skills• Document common requirements• Market reconnaissance• Sector wide (framework) agreement• Open services• Establish shared solution for sector

– Services of other NRENs– UNINETT service– Open source based pilot service– Extending open services

Suggested next steps

1. Establish eCampus working group1. publish recommendations on audio2. publish common web conferencing reqs3. Market reconnaissance

• functionality• licensing models/costs• open services

4. Reach consensus on sector wide solutions