drzic stvarnost
DESCRIPTION
drzicTRANSCRIPT
-
1
cmaeoee cmeap-
, cmaeoea. -
",
"
"
" .
" ,
-
(1508 - 1567) , ,
, ,
.
, ,1 -
,2 ,
. -
"
" ,
,
. , , -
.
" ,
1 . J.Dayre, Dubrovake studij e, Zagreb, 1938; .Jelii, Marin Dri, pj esnik dubrovake
sirotinj e, Zagreb, 1950; Isti, Marin Dri Vidra, Beograd, 1958; 1508 - 1958, ,
, 1958; ., , , 1964; L . Kouta, Pravi i obrnuti svij et u Dri ievu
Dundu Maroj u, Mogunosti , Sp\it,l 96%,XV, 11, str. 1356-1376; 12, str. 1479
-1492; Zbornik radova o
Mrinu Driu, Zagreb, 1969.2 . ., , Jlemonuc , 1963, . 4, . 349
-
380; F. velec, Komiki teatar Marina Dria, Zagreb, 1968; M. , Mapoj e -
, , , 1974, . 23,
. 517-532; F.ale, Dj ela, Marin Dri, Zagreb, 1979; 3. , Mapoj e ,
, 1982.
-
7 6
, , "
-
, ,
. (1549), , , -
, , , :
/ ".
-
,
" ,
. "
-
. -
, -
, :
/ "?
: -
(1551),
"
-
". ,
( 1548)
, ,
, , ", . ,
, -
, , . -
, "
", ,
-
16. , :
, -
,
, -
, ".3
-
.4
"
-
, , " ,
"
.
, , -
, -
"
",5
-
. ",
"
",
" , ,
3 . , 1508
-1958,
, . , . 250- 251.
4 Poetika humanizma i renesanse, II , Beograd, 1963, . 47.
5 S. P. Novak, Pri mj cri iz povij esti hrvatskc dramc
", Dubrovnik, XIX , 3
-4, 1976, . 193-194.
-
7 7
", ,/
-
",' ,
". ,
-
",
-
",
"
" ,
", ,
",
- . -
-
, :
,
, ". ,
, ",
" , .
, -
, -
. " ,
" ,
; , , ,
-
".
-
, -
. "
" ,
(1551), , -
", , , ,
":
".
2
, (-
) , .
"
", .
", ,
-
, -
, , ,
".7
(1555), " ,
-
" (
")
, , 16.
6 . , , XVI , , 2005, . 286.
7 Poetika humanizma i renesanse, II, . 61.
-
7 8
(1463-1520).
, -
",
-
, (
"\), . .
, -
dy , ". ,
, -
, ( , 1525),
",8
".
-
-
, -
.
-
, -
, , , -
", , .
"
", . ,
-
, , "
".9 , ,
-
"
"
", , ,
",
-
, , " (
, . , "), ( ) ,
, -,
"( ) .
-
, ,
" (Theatar M undi),
-
: " ( ), ,
( ), ,
", . , ,
-
, , :
, , ".
-
: ", , ?
",
!", . ,
-
",
-
" ,
, , -
.
8 ,. 56.
9 Poetika humanizma i renesanse, I, . , . 217.
-
u 7 9
, ,
"
".10
" , .
".
" ,
, ".
", ,
-
",
. "
-
, , ,
, " -
"." , ,
, . -
",
.
3
"
: "
". , ,
, " , ,
.
, "
" . ,
, , , -
, ,
,
. ",
-
, , -
. , ",
. :
, ".
"
" -
",
"
, , . " ,
";
-
;
; ; -
1" , . 312.u , . 159.
-
80
, .
,
, ", , ,
, , -
.
" ,
-
, ".
" ,
",
" , (
").
-
, ",12
.
",
"
"13
. -
(, ).
, , ,
" ( , ),
-
" ,
"
. ,
". ,
: ( . ) ",
-
volentij ero",
- "(); ,
-
",
",
",
, al piu 8!"( );
: , : "(), .
-
":
( . , ")
-
". , ,
: ! ! ! !
! , !" ,
, ", ,
, : Chi sete voi , omo
dabben? Che volete?" ,
",
" : ? ! ,
?"
, ":
", ,
, ,
. "
-
" (, ?
"),
" , II, . 53.
13 , . 56
- 57.
-
^ 8 1
, (, ? !), -
(, ?").
: -
, " ,
( . ;
"),
"
: " , , ,
".
" -
, "
:
,
,
, ,
,
, , !" (., )
*
, ,
, ,
, .
"
" ,
, , -
-
",
"
"
"
-
. (-)
(-
) - ( / ), ,
-
",
, , ,
, - - ,
".
--
, , , -
, , -
",
" 14 "
-
, .
: , , , , , , -
, , , .
" . , . , . 531.
-
82
B rank o L et i
M ARIN DR I ON REALITY AND RF.AL IN THE COM EDIES OF THE RENA ISSANCE
(Summary)
Dri's comedies both explicitly and implicitly indicatc his thcoretical and artistic attitude tovvard
reali ty. Hc respccted the opinions of the contemporary Italian theoreticians and comediographcrs that
thc authors on the scene should represent modern towns, domcstic humours and customs. but, in
addition to this, he emphasized the need for the artistic reprcscntation of real ity, becausc art, as
negromanzia, gave some more universal representation of it. Hc espccially applicd this dcmand in the
concept of the eomic characters who, in the previous comical forms, werc markcd by a ccrtain comical
featurc: the author, as a negromante, should bring them to li fe in order to makc thcm "walk
" and
"talk
",
as i f they were al ive. Only then, they would be "funny in a proper way
".