draft - predecisional 0 fy 09 mission/program support sub-goal program plan william f. broglie...

DRAFT - PREDECISIONAL1

FY 09 Mission/Program Support Sub-Goal

Program Plan

William F. BroglieNovember 16, 2006

Workforce Management

Administrative Services

Acquisition & Grants

Financial ServicesFacilities

IT Services


Overview

• FY 09 Program Plan Vision for 2013– Cost effective, value-added service provider-of-choice for

workforce management, acquisition and grants, facilities, financial, IT and administrative services.

– Long range plans identifying future requirements for:• Facilities

• Information Technology

• Workforce Management

NEP/NEC Recommendation:

NEP/NEC Guidance Requested: Require IT Long-Range Plan to be Developed for FY 10-14 PPBES


Overview

FY09 – FY13 Program Plan Objectives– Programs and services comply with legal, regulatory and departmental

mandates; and enable NOAA and its partners to efficiently accomplish NOAA mission objectives.

– Process improvements enhance quality, cost-effectiveness and timeliness of services and reflect best management practices

– Acquisition and Grants: timely awards, aligned with NOAA’s mission; effective oversight and administration to maximize outcomes.

– Financial and Administrative Services and systems: compliance with legal/regulatory requirements; enable informed management decision-making.

– Facilities: safe, sustainable, and modern; with increased opportunities for collaboration and integration within NOAA and with NOAA’s partners.

– IT: Secure, sound, and robust infrastructure and processes to advance NOAA mission; leverages NOAA-wide economies of scale; enhances workforce collaboration and sharing of data and knowledge.

– Workforce Management: value-added systems and processes promoting both a highly-skilled workforce and Merit System principles in support of NOAA mission goals.


Overview

FY09-FY13 Program Plan Achievements

• Acquisition and Grants: Integrated and sustained BPR improvements

• Administrative Services: Compliance with requirements: HSPD-12, deemed exports, competitive sourcing, personal property.

• Facilities: Completion/occupancy of major facility projects (Pacific Region Center and La Jolla); facility condition index improved through targeted restoration investments; long-range planning process.

• Financial Services: End-to-End Resource Management System implemented; Budget BPR recommendations fully implemented/integrated.

• Information Technology: Security/Certification & Accreditation services integrated across NOAA; NOAA Enterprise MIS implemented.

• Workforce Management: WFM BPR recommendations partially implemented; systems promote employee competency aligned with NOAA business requirements; e-OPF implemented.


Overview

FY09-FY13 Program Plan Shortfalls/Excesses• NO EXCESSES!

• Program-Specific Shortfalls:

– Administrative Services: Unfunded/under-funded mandates with rising expectations/ requirements: deemed exports, HSPD-12, personal property, and security/guard services.

– Facilities: Inadequate recapitalization funding stream to support sustained execution of facility long term plan.

– Financial Services: Unfunded requirements for Working Capital Fund full contribution and CBS system enhancements.

– Information Technology: Unfunded requirements for redundancy in critical infrastructure (e.g., single points of failure, network infrastructure, public web services, and electronic mail services). Need for fully-compliant C&A and IT Security program. Inadequate resources to develop and execute long-range IT recapitalization/modernization plan and transformation of NOAA’s web.

– Workforce Management: Sustained funding stream for systems and programs (e.g., integrated human resources management system, learning management system and competency models).


Funding

NOTES:

1. Fiscal and programming guidance concerning facility projects: Pacific Region Center, La Jolla, Fairbanks & BIGELOW homeporting improvements.

2. Fiscal and programming guidance concerning transfer of funding from Leadership Sub-Goal to the Program Support Sub-Goal (Information Technology Services Program).

FY 08 FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13

$242.9 $374.6 $243.1 $205.6 $205.6 $205.6

-$25.8 $149.4 $83.8 $14.9 $14.9

Facilities¹ -$40.7 $134.5 $68.9 $0.0 $0.0

IT Services² $14.9 $14.9 $14.9 $14.9 $14.9

$348.8 $392.5 $289.4 $220.5 $220.5

Current Program

Adjustments to Reflect Fiscal & Programming Guidance

FY 09 Program

($M)


Details

• Strategy to Meet Sub-Goal Objectives and Fiscal/Programming Guidance

√ Funds allocated in accordance with fiscal and programming guidance and in consideration of Annual Guidance Memo and Strategic Plan.

√ Identified significant, extensive Gaps with no excess capacity and no capabilities that could be eliminated in out-years.

√ Utilized the Program Operating Plans (POPs) to evaluate to what extent priorities could be accomplished within the Current Program and Revised Program funding detailed in Serial 3.

√ Above Core requirements identified and prioritized.

√ Reallocate resources and funding from Line Offices and Mission Goals to support major projects: PRC and La Jolla.

√ Maintain required programs and services to meet or exceed legal, regulatory and departmental mandates.

√ Implement BPR recommendations, and create a climate of continuous process assessments that supports end-to-end business process improvements.


Details Desired End State (FY 09 and FY 13)

and Ability to Meet

Acquisition/Grants: FY 09 FY 13Sustainment of Grants on Line and Grants BPR G G

Fully implemented Acquisitions BPR Y Y

Integrated planning processes for acquisitions and grants: AGO and NOAA customers

Y Y

“Rational” work environment for AGO employees R Y

Administrative Services:Implement competitive sourcing feasibility study plan G G

Comply with deemed exports requirements G Y

Comply with HSPD-12 requirements Y Y

Comply with personal property program requirements Y Y



and Ability to Meet

Facilities: FY 09 FY 13Integrated long-range facility modernization planning G G

Sustained funding strategy to support long-term facility modernization requirements

R R

Pacific Region Center, La Jolla, & BIGELOW homeporting completed

G G

Complete Pribilofs cleanup; ongoing monitoring G G

Initiate redevelopment of Beaufort, WRC, Montlake, Norfolk, Miami

R R

Financial Services: FY 09 FY 13Maintain clean audit opinion, no material findings G G

Implementation of E2E resource mgmt system G Y

CBS enhancements supported R R


Information Technology: FY 09 FY 13Integrated Enterprise-level IT Security, including C&A Y Y

Phased implementation/development of MIS G G

Sound, secure (and redundant) network/infrastructure R R

Long-range IT capital planning process R R

Implemented OneNOAA Web presence R R

Workforce Management:Robust workforce planning (including competency development) capabilities

Y Y

Implementation of BPR recommendations (hiring; training & development)

Y Y

Fully implemented HSPD-12 and e-OPF Y Y


and Ability to Meet


• How Program Capabilities Were Prioritized:1. Priorities identified in NOAA 2006-2011 Strategic Plan, April 2005

2. Recognized AGM and Fiscal/Program Guidance Priorities

3. Emphasized need to sustain/maintain current capacities (assumes inflation increases to sustain capacities will be budgeted separately).

4. Utilized POPs to evaluate capabilities and capacities across Mission Support at current and 100% level.

5. Items eliminated in FY08 DOC Passback re-evaluated.

6. Evolving program requirements (Deemed Exports, HSPD-12, competitive sourcing feasibility studies) addressed.

7. Integrated Priority Lists items evaluated for (a) applicability to Program Support and (b) priority against current program.

Details


• How Program Capabilities Were Integrated Across Programs:– Program capabilities analyzed for duplication, low priority

services and/or availability of more cost effective methods of providing services.

– Integration across Program Support programs for select initiatives: HSPD-12, personal property/Laptops/PII

– Facility requirements integrated with other program directions (fleet modernization, etc.) and balanced against other competing program priorities to ensure integration.

Details


Compliance with Guidance

ISSUE Compliance

Provide recommendation for annual funding level for real property recapitalization. Include analysis and rationale for proposed level. Based on recommended funding level, develop recommendation for projects with start dates, to be funded In coordination with Weather and Water and the National Weather Service, fund Weather Forecast Office (WFO) lease costs. Provide a plan for the WFO Facilities Management Staff.

Working with the Satellite sub-goal, provide plan for permanent solution to facility requirements for Fairbanks Command and Data Acquisition Station (CDAS).

Fund homeporting requirement for the Bigelow. Provide details on impact of not implementing and cost to eliminate single points of failure for network infrastructure (ITS) Mission Support goal to provide recommendation on the Commerce Business System (CBS) funding shortfall. Various technical adjustments (inter-program realignments)



ISSUE Compliance

Working with all goals and subgoals who fund personnel who will occupy the PRC and La Jolla, transfer funding consistent with the proportion of the requirement generated by the goal from that goal to Mission support for the revised requirements. (Climate Goal is Above Core; Satellite not discussed)

Fund IT Security Centralized Certification & Accreditation (C&A) (Listed in Above Core) Complete implementation of e-OPF as mandated by OPM. (Listed in Above Core) Implement Homeland Security Presidential Directive-12. (Listed in Above Core) Develop competency models to develop/validate competencies in NOAA mission-critical occupations. (Listed in Above Core)


Compliance with Guidance: Facility Recapitalization Level

• Background: Previous recommendation for sustained funding strategy for facility recapitalization/modernization was supported by NEP/NEC and reflected in Program Guidance.

• Serial 3 Guidance requires recommendation of (1) annual funding level, with rationale and analysis; and (2) specific projects to be funded under this level (projects listed in backup).

Recommendation of Methodology:

– Adjusted Facility Recapitalization Rate (FRR) methodology: Annual funding requirements calculated as aggregate Current Replacement Value (CRV) of NOAA owned facility portfolio divided by facility life.

• Research indicates 50 years average facility life as an accepted target---used by DoD and NASA.

• NOAA aggregate CRV (for owned facilities) is approximately $1.77B based on 2005 portfolio valuation.

• FRR: (CRV) / 50 (years average facility life) = $35M for 2005.

• FRR must be adjusted annually based on re-valuation of aggregate CRV of NOAA-owned facility portfolio.

• Design and Engineering (D&E) requirements also must be included to yield adjusted FRR.


Compliance with Guidance: Facility Recapitalization Level

• Total Facility Recapitalization Rate for program years:

$ in M 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013CRV $2,403 $2,595 $2,803 $3,027 $3,269FRR $48 $52 $56 $61 $65D&E $7 $8 $8 $9 $10Adjusted FRR $55 $60 $64 $70 $75

Facility Recapitalization Rate

• Recapitalization methodology assumes that there is adequate funding available to address the sustainment and restoration requirements. Inadequate sustainment and restoration reduces facility life, accelerating need for recapitalization.

** Phased implementation recommended; FY 09 – 10. See next slide


NEP/NEC Guidance Requested: Accept Adjusted Facility Recapitalization Rate (FRR) as methodology for calculating recapitalization requirements.


Compliance with Guidance: Facility Recapitalization Projects

• Phased Implementation of Recapitalization Funding: FY 09-10

• Projects previously identified in NOAA Facility Modernization Plan--Long-Range Facility Plan: FY 2008-2017

Project FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY 14-16National Center for Coastal Ocean Science--Beaufort, NC

2.4 44.0 30.0 1.4 0.0

Western Regional Center--Seattle, WA 1.0 4.0 34.0 12.7 0.0Montlake Laboratory--Seattle, WA 0.7 8.0 50.0 60.0 11.4Atlantic Marine Operations Center--Norfolk, VA

0.7 4.0 4.9 15.0 27.5

Miami Science and Research Center--Miami, FL

1.0 143.0

Future Projects 82.1Total $4.8 $60.0 $64.0 $70.0 $75.0

Potential Recapitalization/Modernization Investments--FY 2009 - 13 ($M)


NEP/NEC Guidance Requested: Approve phased funding strategy and recommended projects to be funded under strategy.


Compliance with Guidance: Single Points of Failure

Elimination of Single Points of Failure• The elimination of single points of failure will improve NOAA’s Silver Spring

Metro Center (SSMC) network infrastructure, public web services (PWS), and electronic mail services.

• Not implementing will negatively impact NOAA’s ability to accomplish its corporate priorities. Reduction of key services will impact NOAA’s ability to deliver data products resulting in the inability for programs to meet their goals.

• Lack of or reduced Internet service will impact NOAA’s ability to deliver its data products to all customers and the general public. This includes, but is not limited to, Life and Property data made available to the public via the Internet. For example, Hurricane X’s tracking data would not be available to the public.

• The reduction in tier 3 support will impact the Line Office local area networks (LANs) and increase the IT security risk to all NOAA systems, including networks.


Major Program Adjustments

• Major Program Adjustments (Compliance with Fiscal/Program Guidance):

SERIAL 3 LEVEL - Revised Program Level

PRCLa JollaFairbanksBIGELOW

OCIO Transfer

Facility Program Guidance Adjustments ($40,700.00) $134,500.00 $68,900.00 $0.00

MISSION SUPPORT ($000) FY 09 FY10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13

MISSION SUPPORT - Current Level $374,623.00 $243,111.00 $205,623.00 $205,623.00 $205,623.00

Out-Year Goal Adjustments

PROPOSED ADJUSTMENTS:

Delta: Revised vs Current

FACILITY:Program Guidance &

$223,400.00

($27,123.00) $17,889.00 $17,777.00 $17,777.00 $17,777.00

$347,500.00 $261,000.00 $223,400.00 $223,400.00

($31,000.00) $50,000.00 $0.00 $0.00

($6,000.00) $61,300.00 $68,900.00 $0.00

($10,000.00) $15,000.00 $0.00 $0.00

$6,300.00 $8,200.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$14,900.00 $14,900.00 $14,900.00

$0.00

$0.00

$14,900.00

$14,900.00 $14,900.00IT SERVICES: Program Guidance

ITS Program Guidance Adjustments $14,900.00 $14,900.00

PROPOSED PROGRAM LEVEL $392,511.00 $289,423.00

NET ADJUSTMENTS ($25,800.00) $149,400.00 $83,800.00 $14,900.00 $14,900.00

$348,823.00

$14,900.00

$0.00

$220,523.00 $220,523.00

$14,900.00

$0.00


Major Program Adjustments:Funding for PRC & LaJolla Projects

Program Guidance: • “…transfer funding consistent with the proportion of the requirement generated

by the goal from that goal to Mission support for the revised requirements…”• Benefit/Risk: PRC – Consolidates programs and replaces inadequate

facilities; large requirement impacts Mission Goal capability. La Jolla – Provides safe facility, sustains programs and

strategic program relationships; large requirement impacts Mission Goal capability.

• Transfers from Mission Goals and satellite sub-goal based on planned occupancy (people) of facilities by Goal/Program:

FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13

TOTAL 0.0 111.3 68.9 0.0 0.0Ecosystems 100.9 57.2C&T 0.3 0.3W/W 7.6 8.6Satellites 1.7 1.9Climate 0.8 0.9

PRC & LaJolla Facility ProjectsTransfer from Mission Goals & Satellite Program


Major Program Adjustments:Funding for PRC & LaJolla Projects (cont’d)

PROPOSED ADJUSTMENTS:

($M) FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13

Pacific Regional Center (PRC) ($6.0) $61.3 $68.9

La Jolla SW Fisheries Science Ctr ($31.0) $50.0

TOTAL ($37.0) $111.3 $68.9


NEP/NEC Guidance Requested: Accept proposed adjustments to fund PRC and La Jolla projects as approved by NEP/NEC.

• Transfers to Program Support for PRC and La Jolla projects


Major Program AdjustmentsFairbanks CDAS

Fairbanks Command and Data Acquisition Station:• Background: DoC Passback eliminated funding, based on no long-term primary

use for facility beyond 2013. Alternative solution approved by NEP/NEC: Temporary, modular buildings with shorter life span.

• Benefit/Risk: Alternative most likely to get DoC support, but is only a temporary solution.

– Out-year costs (current estimate: $20M-25M) beyond 2013 to shut down and dispose facility.

– Fund development of detailed implementation plan and refined cost estimates in FY07 through NESDIS PAC funding.

PROPOSED ADJUSTMENT:

($M) FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13

Fairbanks CDAS ($10.0) $15.0


NEP/NEC Guidance Requested: Accept proposed adjustment to fund Fairbanks temporary solution.


Major Program AdjustmentsBIGELOW Homeporting

BIGELOW Homeporting

• Background: BIGELOW commissioned in FY2006; larger vessel—longer, wider, and with a deeper draft—than ship replaced. Deeper draft requires dredging of the existing Woods Hole berthing area and channel. Existing pier and bulkhead need to be replaced to safely support ship operations.

• Benefit/Risk: Leverages existing facilities and collaboration opportunities; will require out-year, periodic dredging (≈$1.5M every 10 yrs.).

PROPOSED ADJUSTMENT:

($M) FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13

BIGELOW Homeporting $6.3 $8.2


NEP/NEC Guidance Requested: Accept proposed adjustment to fund BIGELOW homeport improvements (dredging and pier replacement).


Above Core

• Rationale for Prioritization of Above Core Requirements– Responsiveness to fiscal and program guidance– Impact on accomplishment of program mission: sustainment of

capabilities vs. enhancement– Current clarity of requirements

• Methodology for Prioritization:– Segregated ORF vs. PAC– ORF — 4 Tiers: (1) Required to Comply with Fiscal/Program Guidance;

(2) - (4) based on mission impact and clarity of requirements– PAC — 2 Tiers based on mission impact and requirements clarity

• Impact and Risk of Not Funding Above Core Requirements: Addressed in Individual Quad Charts in Backup Information

• Potential Unfunded Requirements (Not Currently Fully Defined) – HSPD-12 (IT and Facility impacts)– IT Recapitalization


Above Core RequirementsPrioritized List—ORF

Priority Above Core Issue FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13

E-OPF Annual Licensing Costs 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3

Centralized C&A Services 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0

Develop Competency Models 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2

HSPD-12 (WFM) 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4

HSPD-12 (ADS) 1.8 1.5 3.3 1.8 1.5

4.7 4.4 6.2 4.7 4.4

Above Core Requirements--ORF

Req

uir

ed t

o C

om

ply

w

ith

Fis

cal

& P

rog

ram

G

uid

ance

TOTAL ABOVE CORE REQUIRED FOR COMPLIANCE

1. TIER ONE: Compliance with Fiscal and Programming Guidance


NEP/NEC Guidance Requested: Fund Tier One Above Core items required for Compliance with Fiscal/Programming Guidance.



2. TIER TWO: Sustain Current Program Capabilities


1 Guard Services Contract 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.52 Working Capital Fund (Finance) 1.0 1.4 1.7 2.1 2.43 Learning Management System 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.64 Oracle Licenses 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.05 End-to-End Resource Mgmt System 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5

6Elimination of Single Points of Failure in NOAA’s Silver Spring Metro Center (SSMC) Network Infrastructure

0.8 0.8 1.0 1.0 1.0

7Elimination of Single Points of Failure in Public Web Services

1.2 1.4 0.9 0.9 0.9

7.4 7.0 8.1 7.6 8.9


Total Above Core to Sustain Current Capabilities


NEP/NEC Guidance Requested: Fund Tier Two Above Core items required to sustain current program capabilities.



3. TIER THREE: Improve Current Program Capabilities


8 Business Brocess Reengineering 1.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.09 Server Consolidation 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.5 0.0

10 Enhancements to System 3.5 2.0 2.0 1.3 1.311 IT Technology Refresh 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.812 Human Resource Management Sys 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.513 Mandated ADS Functions 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.214 Corporate Complex Sustainment 1.3 1.3 2.3 3.3 3.315 WRC Operations 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.616 OneNOAA Web Presence 5.0 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2

20.9 15.5 15.9 16.3 13.9


Total Above Core to Improve Current Capabilities



4. TIER FOUR Priorities

Priority Above Core Issue FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 1317 Single Enterprise Network 13.3 11.3 11.4 11.4 11.518 New Accounting System 0.9 0.9 5.9 27.0 34.0

19

Elimination of Single Points of Failure in Electronic Mail Services (including migration to Commerce-wide common email system)

13.0 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8

20 ADR 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.321 Corporate Recruitment 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.222 Real Property Asset Mgmt System 1.0 3.0 2.1 1.6 1.623 EAP 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.324 Jame P Martin Worklife Ctr. 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.125 Full Funding of FTEs (ADS) 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.325 Full Funding of FTEs (AQP) 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.325 Full Funding of FTEs (FAC) 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.625 Full Funding of FTEs (FIN) 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.925 Full Funding of FTEs (ITS) 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.725 Full Funding of FTEs (WMP) 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6


NOTE: Requirements identified in this tier do not necessarily mean the requirement itself is lower priority, but may indicate additional analysis is required, or other alternatives to support capability exist.


Above Core RequirementsPrioritized List—PAC

1. TIER ONE:

Priority Above Core Issue FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 131 Facility Recapitalization 4.8 60.0 64.0 70.0 75.0

Above Core Requirements--PAC

2. TIER TWO:

Priority Above Core Issue FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 132 Facility Requirements (IPL+) 92.3 113.2 132.8 79.2 50.2

Above Core Requirements--PAC


NEP/NEC Guidance Requested: Fund Tier One (PAC) Above Core level to support Facility Recapitalization requirements.


Backup Information


Above Core Quads: Tier One—ORF

Investments Required to Comply with

Fiscal and Programming Guidance


PROGRAM ADJUSTMENT FUNDING

BENEFITS AND RISKS

ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES

Compliance with Guidance -- ABOVE CORE Electronic Official Personnel Files (e-OPF)

GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Workforce Management CAPABILITY: HR Programs REQUIREMENT: OPM (e-Gov Initiative) DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:

Funding for annual licensing fees PERFORMANCE MEASURES:

Compliance with OPM milestones

(FY$M ): FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13

Current Program 0 0 0 0 0

Program Adjustment 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3

Proposed Program 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3

CAPABILITY: HR Programs

QUANTITY:Input Capacity Change FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13

Funding ($K) 272 272 272 272 272

Output Capacity Change FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13

Digitized OPFs 70% 90% 100% 100% 100%

Annual licensing fee ($272K) requires consistent funding source

FY 06: Infrastructure established for e-OPF from 01/01/06 forward

FY 06 funds contributed by LO/SOs are sufficient to scan 44% of existing folders during FY 07-08

US, COs, PPI, OAR, NMAO fully fundedNMFS is 73% funded ($56K needed to fully fund)NOS ($79K), NWS ($317K) (or appropriate Programs) must provide funding to meet OPM requirements between FY 07 and FY 11

If Adjustment made, employees have immediate access to personal data from any web browser; NOAA has superior retrieval capability for COOP; time for transfer of records reduced from weeks or months to near real time; potential to free up FTE for higher priority HR activities.

If Adjustment not made, e-OPF has no consistent funding source which could result in OPFs being inaccessible to HR staff and other NOAA employees. Funding would then be needed to print and reestablish paper OPFs to meet legal requirements and conduct HR operations.

Risk: LOs may not fund 100% back-file conversions prior to FY 2009; this would require Programs to make up the difference to meet OPM timeline of 50% by FY 08, 20% in FY 09-10, and 10% in out years


Compliance with Guidance -- ABOVE CORECentralized Certification &

Accreditation (C&A) Services


BENEFITS AND RISKS


GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Information Technology Services CAPABILITY: IT Security REQUIREMENT: Centralized Certification & Accreditation (C&A)

Services DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: Implement centralized C&A

team to ensure consistency in the review of C&A packages, complete certification, and provide controls testing for each system prior to submission to Commerce

PERFORMANCE MEASURES: IT Security Incidents

Standardize C&A process throughout NOAA Oct 2007 Capability of providing a suite of C&A services Oct 2007 Automate C&A process Oct 2008 Provide C&A dashboard capability Mar 2009

If program adjustment is made: Compliance with Federal Information Security Management

Act (FISMA) and Commerce IT Security Policy Maintain 100% of NOAA IT systems that have a current C&A

If program adjustment is not made: ‘Out of compliance’ with July 12, 2006 OMB memo M-06-19

from Karen Evans (Ofc of E-Gov & IT) that requires agencies to meet existing security requirements (e.g., correct security weaknesses in stead-state investments) before new funds are spent on system development, modernization, or enhancement

Restrict public access to hazardous weather warnings and hurricane tracking information during peak demand periods when capability of enterprise security systems is exceeded

Retain IT Security material weakness (DOC OIG) Delay implementation of IT Security Architecture by 2 to 3

years

(FY$M): FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13Current Program 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Program Adjustment 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Proposed Program 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0

CAPABILITY: IT SecurityQUANTITY:Input Capacity Change FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13None 0 0 0 0 0

Output Capacity Change FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13% of NOAA IT systems with current C&A 100 100 100 100 100IT security incidents resulting from inactivity 497 447 402 362 326



BENEFITS AND RISKS

(FY$M ): FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13Current Program 0 0 0 0 0Program Adjustment 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2Proposed Program 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2

CAPABILITY: Strategic M anagement of Human Capital

QUANTITY:Input Capacity Change FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13Funding ($K) 225 200 200 200 200

Output Capacity Change FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13Competency models 6 5 5 5 5


Compliance with Guidance -- ABOVE CORE Develop Competency Models

GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Workforce Management CAPABILITY: Strategic Management of Human Capital

REQUIREMENT: 5 U.S.C. 1103(c); Human Capital Initiative

of PMA; E.O. 13352 (Cooperative Conservation) DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:

Fund development of competency models for 25 of NOAA’s highest priority and/or most populous job series and work roles to support workforce planning

PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Number of valid competency models developed FY 07- 08: WFMO works with contractor and LO/COs to

develop/validate NOAA foundational competency model, DOC-assigned competency models, and other high-priority models using existing interagency agreement with OPM; complete skills gap assessments for priority models

FY 09: WFMO works with contractor and LO/COs to validate competency model for Cooperative Conservation Competencies and develop/validate an additional 5 competency models; complete skills gap assessments for priority models

FY 10-13: WFMO works with contractor and LO/COs to develop/validate an additional 5 competency models each year; complete skills gap assessments for priority models

Ease of using models for skills gap assessments and workforce planning dependent on nature of automated competency management system available

If Adjustment made, NOAA will be able to add 26 validated competency models to those developed in FY 07 & FY 08 increasing our ability to determine skills gaps and develop workforce plans to fill those gaps

Filling skills gaps helps meet the AGM guidance for “A more flexible, diverse and mobile workforce with minimal skill gaps”

Validated competency models can serve as a basis for valid QuickHire and interview questions, training needs assessments, succession planning, and other HR processes.

If Adjustment not made, NOAA not having valid data to use for workforce planning (closing skills gaps), recruitment, training, other HR processes

Barriers to implementation include the time resources required of NOAA managers & employees to develop and validate models



BENEFITS AND RISKS

(FY$M): FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13Current Program 0 0 0 0 0Program Adjustment 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4Proposed Program 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4


QUANTITY:Input Capacity Change FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13FTE 5 5 5 5 5Funding (K) 375 375 375 375 375

Output Capacity Change FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13Timely security clearances 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%


Compliance with Guidance -- ABOVE CORE HSPD-12

(Workforce Management)

GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Workforce Management CAPABILITY: Human Resources Programs REQUIREMENT: Homeland Security Presidential Directive

(HSPD)-12 DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:

5 FTE and funding to support the human resource requirements created by HSPD-12

PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Timely security clearances Error rates Hiring cycle time

FY09, Q2: Fill 5 ZS-IV personnel security positions Positions will:

Initiate and monitor process for all levels of security clearance requests for new employeesReview and adjudicate pre-employment suitability investigation results with LO hiring officials (new with HSPD-12; post-employment suitability has been an on-going responsibility)Serve as PIV sponsor for all new hire actionsEnsure that the appropriate on-line training is completedComplete appropriate activities related to badging and re-badging

Other NOAA players include the IT Services, Administrative Services, and Facilities Programs

If adjustment made, MS-WMP able to process 100% of new security requirements timely while carrying out on-going workload

If adjustment not made, security-related work likely to be delayed while current staff works to keep up with volume and still carry out other HR activities; quality and accuracy of all work suffers; other HR activities (e.g., hiring) already being delayed to focus on security

New employees may not be able to enter on duty in a timely fashion until all required security clearances are completed. High potential to lose candidates to other positions or agencies if process too slow

In mid-1990s, MS-WMP gave up 6 FTE to DOC for security-related work. Work has returned with HSPD-12, but not the FTEs

No direct dependencies on other programs


GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Administrative Services CAPABILITY: Logistics REQUIREMENT: HSPD-12 Credentialing DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: Implementation of a

new standardized credentialing process to comply with OMB-05-24

PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Number/percentage of employees and equipment

processed annually to remain compliant

Compliance with Guidance -- ABOVE CORE HSPD-12

(Administrative Services)


BENEFITS AND RISKS


CAPABILITY:

QUANTITY:Input Capacity Change FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13Capacit--FTEy (+/-) 3 3 3 3 3Funding 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4

Output Capacity Change FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13Capacity (+/-) 0 0 0 0 0Capacity (+/-) 0 0 0 0 0Capacity (+/-) 0 0 0 0 0


DOC has selected the GSA Managed Service Office to implement the Program; NOAA retains specific abjudication responsibilities

Smartcards, background checks, card readers, servers, installation and maintenance, training

Card implementation begins in October 2006; full implementation by October 2008

FY09-FY13 primarily for ongoing maintenance, annual employee rebadging, logical access for computers, and equipment replacement and upgrades

The program is designed to enhance security, reduce identity fraud, and protect personal privacy

Personnel security at risk, identity fraud not deterred Risks/barriers to implementation – interfaces to

legacy systems


Above Core Quads:Tier One—PAC

Investments

Required to Fund Facility Recapitalization Requirements

(using Facility Recapitalization Rate)


GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Facilities CAPABILITY: Construction REQUIREMENT: Facility Recapitalization DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: Implementation of a

sustained funding strategy to address NOAA facility recapitalization requirements

PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Improved portfolio facility condition index Elimination of substantial backlog of repair projects

($50-60M)

ABOVE CORE (PAC T-1): Facility Recapitalization Requirements


BENEFITS AND RISKS


CAPABILITY:

QUANTITY:Input Capacity Change FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13Capacit--FTEy (+/-) 0 0 0 0 0Funding 4.8 60.0 64.0 70.0 75.0



Phased implementation of funding level in FY 09-10. Initial years’ funding supports (1) delineation of program

of requirements and analysis of alternatives, and (2) design.

Specific schedules and milestones for each project still need to be developed. High level implementation schedule reflected on next slide.

Enables NOAA to replace owned facilities that have reached the end of their useful life.

Provides modern, state-of-the-art, and safe working conditions

Risks: Funding level is substantial and will face severe

budget challenge. Unclear where possible offsets would come,

and at what expense.


ABOVE CORE (PAC T-1): Facility Recapitalization Requirements

• Projects Recommended Under Recapitalization Funding: Projects previously identified in NOAA Facility Modernization Plan--Long-Range Facility Plan: FY 2008-2017

Project FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20National Center for Coastal Ocean Science--Beaufort, NC

2.4 44.0 30.0 1.4

Western Regional Center--Seattle, WA 1.0 4.0 34.0 12.7Montlake Laboratory--Seattle, WA 0.7 8.0 50.0 60.0 11.4Atlantic Marine Operations Center--Norfolk, VA

0.7 4.0 4.9 15.0 27.5

Miami Science and Research Center--Miami, FL

1.0 40.0 80.0 23.0

Futre Projects 2.1 8.0 72.0 102.0 110.0 119.0 129.0Total $4.8 $60.0 $64.0 $70.0 $75.0 $81.0 $88.0 $95.0 $102.0 $110.0 $119.0 $129.0

Potential Recapitalization/Modernization Investments--FY 2009 - 20 ($ in M)

Background:

Base 05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20

CRV $1,766 $1,908 $2,060 $2,225 $2,403 $2,595 $2,803 $3,027 $3,269 $3,531 $3,814 $4,119 $4,448 $4,804 $5,188 $5,603FRR $35 $38 $41 $45 $48 $52 $56 $61 $65 $71 $76 $82 $89 $96 $104 $112D&E $5 $6 $6 $7 $7 $8 $8 $9 $10 $11 $11 $12 $13 $14 $16 $17

Adjusted FRR $41 $44 $47 $51 $55 $60 $64 $70 $75 $81 $88 $95 $102 $110 $119 $129

NOTES:CRV (Current Replacement Value) escalated 8% due to growing construction costs throughout the country.FRR (Facility Recapitalization Rate) based on 50 year life of facility. Construction costs only. Calculated as CRV/50 years.D&E (Design, Engineering, Project Management) estimated at 15% of construction costs.

Adjusted Facility Recapitalization Rate: FY 2009 - 2020 ($ in M)


Above Core Quads: Tier Two—ORF

Investments Required to Sustain

Current Services/Capabilities


GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Administrative Services CAPABILITY: Logistics REQUIREMENT: NOAA-wide Guard Services Contracts DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:

Funding to pay for three Guard Service contracts covering NCR, Boulder and Seattle

PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Proper physical security for NOAA facilities and staff Timely payment of contracts

Sustain Current Capabilities--Above Core:

Guard Service Contract


BENEFITS AND RISKS

(FY$M ): FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13

Current Program 4.8 4.9 5.1 5.2 5.4

Program Adjustment 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.5Proposed Program 7.1 7.2 7.5 7.7 7.9

CAPABILITY:

QUANTITY:

Input Capacity Change FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13

Capacity (+/-) 0 0 0 0 0Capacity (+/-) 0 0 0 0 0

Capacity (+/-) 0 0 0 0 0

Output Capacity Change FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13Capacity (+/-) 0 0 0 0 0Capacity (+/-) 0 0 0 0 0Capacity (+/-) 0 0 0 0 0


Contracts require funding in first quarter each year

Guard Service is “Must Pay” for NOAA

Actual funding was previously provided through the Working Capital Fund, and was first requested in FY07. FY06 funding came via a reprogramming and a DOC subsidy. FY07 funding will be short by over $2.0M.

Services to NOAA Programs will be reduced or Direct Billed, causing unacceptable loss of capability

Required payments produce a shortfall for other critical Program Support requirements


Sustain Current Capabilities--Above Core: Working Capital Fund (Financial)


BENEFITS AND RISKS

(FY$M ): FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13Current Program 34,425 34,425 34425 34425 34425Program Adjustment 1012 1355 1702 2053 2407Proposed Program 35,437 35,780 36,127 36,478 36,832

CAPABILITY:

QUANTITY:Input Capacity Change FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13Capacity (+/-) 0 0 0 0 0Capacity (+/-) 0 0 0 0 0Capacity (+/-) 0 0 0 0 0



GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Financial Services CAPABILITY: NOAA Centralized Payments REQUIREMENT: Centralized Payments/WCF DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:

Funding mechanism to process NOAA centralized payments

PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Accurate on-time end of year close out Timely allocation of appropriation

DOC requires funding in first quarter each year

WCF is “Must Pay” for NOAA

Actual funding for assessments have not kept pace with the bill

Services to NOAA Programs will be reduced or Direct Billed, causing loss of capability

Required payments produces a shortfall for other Common Services requirements as well


Sustain Current Capabilities--Above Core: Learning Management System


BENEFITS AND RISKS


CAPABILITY: Strategoc Management of Human Capital

QUANTITY:Input Capacity Change FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13Funds ($K) 625 625 625 625 625



GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Workforce Management CAPABILITY: Strategic Management of Human Capital REQUIREMENT: 5 CFR; BPR implementation DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:

Fund the NOAA portion of the DOC Learning Management System including a competency management functionality

PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Compliance with OPM reporting requirements

FY 2007 Q1-Q2: DOC competition for LMS; develop requirements for competency management module

FY 2007 Q3-Q4: Implement new LMS FY 2008: Implement competency management module FY 09-13: Maintain LMS licenses

If Adjustment made, NOAA will be able to fully support the new Training and Development business process to meet new OPM training data reporting requirements, provide cost-effective training to employees, and support the competency assessment and skills gap analysis required for workforce planning.

If Adjustment not made, NOAA will not be assured of a having a business process and system to meet OPM data reporting requirements or to efficiently support workforce planning via competency management functionality; funding would be dependent on direct bill.

No dependencies on other programs



BENEFITS AND RISKS

(FY$M ): FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13Current Program 0 0 0 0 0Program Adjustment 1 0 1 0 1Proposed Program 1 0 1 0 1

CAPABILITY:




Program Support Above Core: Commerce Business System

Oracle Licenses

GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Financial Services CAPABILITY: Accounting Services and Funds

Management REQUIREMENT: Commerce Business System DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:

Oracle license renewal PERFORMANCE MEASURES:

Improved funds control Accurate and timely financial information

FY 2009 - 2013

• Two year term purchase of Oracle internet application server licenses to support NOAA users of CBS and Grants On Line

Supports new DOC Web Enabled CBS Application to NOAA

Enables term purchases of Oracle Internet Application Server Licenses

System at risk with obsolete software

Above Core request serves as place holder until accurate costing is received from OCIO



BENEFITS AND RISKS

(FY$M ): FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13Current Program 0 0 0 0 0Program Adjustment 800 500 500 500 500Proposed Program 800 500 500 500 500

CAPABILITY:




Sustain Current Capabilities--Above Core: End to End Resource Management System

GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Financial Services CAPABILITY: PPBES Management Information System REQUIREMENT: End to End Resource Management

System DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:

Maintenance and sustainment costs PERFORMANCE MEASURES:

Accurate and timely financial information for program managers

Provides improved budget development and production; including budget justification and all necessary exhibits

Enables interface with Commerce Business System and consolidates Reporting System

Eliminates separate system inefficiency and costly labor-intensive processes

Leverages integrated investment by connecting to mission support system support architecture for NOAA’s planning, programming, budgeting and execution processes

Fewer unlinked systems support all phases of PPBES

FY 2009-FY 2013

System Maintenance Implementation of operational system Improves the availability and quality of data available for

PPBES



BENEFITS AND RISKS


GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Information Technology Services CAPABILITY: Enterprise Network Operations REQUIREMENT: Elimination of Single Points of Failure in Silver

Spring Metro Center (SSMC) Network Infrastructure and Public Web Services (PWS)

DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: Implement fully-redundant SSMC network backbone with built-in failover, and mirrored web clusters at 7 U.S. locations

PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Network and Application Services Availability

Sustain Current Capabilities--Above Core: Elimination of Single Points of Failure

(SSMC Network Infrastructure & Public Web Services)

Complete implementation of a 10 Gigabit Ethernet SSMC backbone & 10 Gigabit Ethernet Wash DC metropolitan area network (MAN) 2011

Complete hardening of the SSMC backbone in order to produce a 99.99% uptime network 2013

If program adjustment is not made: NOAA data products (provided via SSMC and/or other locations)

will become unavailable during a power failure or when construction/utility equipment (e.g., backhoe) severs the SSMC internet connection. For example, Hurricane X’s tracking data would not be available to the public during the time of need.

Customers and the general public will become displeased with the data unavailability, which in turn becomes front-page, above-the-fold news in the Washington Post for weeks. Can NOAA afford the bad press and management of the resulting triage?

Lack of or reduced Internet service will impact NOAA’s ability to deliver its data products to all customers and the general public. This includes, but is not limited to, Life and Property data made available to the public via the Internet. Reduction of key services will impact NOAA’s ability to deliver data products resulting in the inability for programs to meet their GPRA or corporate performance targets.

IT security risks will increase on all NOAA systems, including networks.

Dependency: Public Web Services within the Weather & Water Goal (via the Web Consolidation Initiative in NWS)


CAPABILITY: Enterprise Network OperationsQUANTITY:Input Capacity Change FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13None 0 0 0 0 0

Output Capacity Change FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13% of available network and application services 99.9 99.9 99.9 99.9 99.99


Supplemental Information

Information Relevant to Fiscal/Programming Guidance


Compliance with Guidance -- ABOVE CORE

HSPD-12 Proposed Five-Year Budget

HSPD-12 Proposed Five-Year Budget

ITEM Unit Cost FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Comments

Smartcard w/ PKI Credential - 17,600 (card replacement) [Direct Bill?] $110 $0 $0 $1,936,000 $0 $0

Assumes initial issuance of all cards in FY2008; full replacement in FY2011 on 3-year refresh cycle

Smartcard w/ PKI Credential - 17,600 (card maintenance fee) [Direct Bill?] $51

$897,600 $897,600 $897,600 $897,600 $897,600

NOAA Employee count (Feds, Commissioned & Contractors) changed to 17,600 based on 10/17/06 MOC figures

Reissued cards [Direct Bill?](10% of 17,600 per year = 1,760) $110

$193,600 $193,600 $0 $193,600 $193,600 10% employee turnover / lost cards

System Certification and Accreditation (ea) Required once every 3 years $250,000

$250,000 $0 $0 $250,000 $0

C&A on 3 year cycle. FY09: Initial C&A = $300,000. FY2010-2011: no C&A costs. FY2012: Re-C&A = $200,000 (i.e., 67% of initial C&A). FY2013: no C&A costs.


Compliance with Guidance -- ABOVE CORE HSPD-12 Proposed Five-Year Budget

HSPD-12 Proposed Five-Year Budget (Continued)

ITEM Unit Cost FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Comments

Additional FTEs – Administrative Services $144,000 $432,000 $432,000 $432,000 $432,000 $432,000

3 additional FTEs needed for HSPD-12 support - NCR, Seattle and KC.

Additional FTEs - WFM $75,000 $375,000 $375,000 $375,000 $375,000 $375,000

5 additional WFM FTEs will be required

TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS $2,148,200 $1,898,200 $3,640,600 $2,148,200 $1,898,200

Cost per NOAA/ Contractor Employee $122 $108 $207 122 $108


Compliance with Guidance:Facility Recapitalization Level

Time (or Service Life)

Adequate

67 Years: Target service life of a facility with full sustainment

Per

form

ance

(or

FC

I)

Inadequate

New Facility

Replace facility.

Facility Life Cycle Performance Curve

FSM: Facility Sustainment Model; FCI: Facility Condition Index; FRR: Facility Revitalization Rate

Average Performance Curve for an inventory with full sustainment. Use FSM, NRC Model, other estimating methods.

More rapid deterioration due to inadequate sustainment, and subsequent loss of service life.

Restoration: Repair necessary to bring facility to an acceptable condition.

Recapitalization Investments: Addresses obsolescence, modernization, revitalization by replacement. The FRR estimates revitalization requirements.

Also measure and use facility utilization, O&M costs, and mission dependency.


Compliance with Guidance:Facility Recapitalization Level

• Other budget development methods researched. Most are more applicable for estimating sustainment and restoration requirements rather than “recapitalization.

– National Research Council (NRC) Recommended Percentage (2%-4% of CRV)

– Facility Condition Index (FCI) (can lead to a recapitalization estimate)

– Deferred Maintenance/Repair Backlog– Validated Repair Needs– Facility Sustainment Model (FSM)– Life Cycle Component Management (can lead to a

recapitalization estimate)

– Other methods primarily used for project prioritization


Compliance with Guidance:Elimination of Single Points of Failure

• Action Item: Eliminate Single Points of Failure: Provide details on the impact of not implementing and cost to eliminate single points of failure • Scope: The elimination of single points of failure will improve NOAA’s Silver Spring Metro Center (SSMC) network infrastructure, public web services

(PWS), and electronic mail services.• Impact of Not Implementing:

– It will negatively impact NOAA’s ability to accomplish its corporate priorities. Reduction of key services will impact NOAA’s ability to deliver data products resulting in the inability for programs to meet their goals.

– The IT Services Program will be forced to: • Reduce the plans for email system redundancy and provide replication of email only for priority users; • Reduce the hardening of the SSMC backbone; • Abandon the optimal solution of providing a common infrastructure, redundancy, and diversity; • Extend the project timelines and scale back the functional requirements for current projects; • Extend system lifecycle refresh periods, thereby, limiting our ability to implement the 10 Gigabit Ethernet SSMC backbone and MAN

networks or new requirements; • Reduce the implementation of PWS hardware and staff supporting the NOAA Continuity of Operations (COOP) Plan requirements; • Abandon the implementation of mirrored clusters (i.e., consolidated set of servers and storage devices) at 7 locations throughout the

U.S. – Lack of or reduced Internet service will impact NOAA’s ability to deliver its data products to all customers and the general public. This

includes, but is not limited to, Life and Property data made available to the public via the Internet. For example, Hurricane X’s tracking data would not be available to the public.

– The reduction in tier 3 support will impact the Line Office local area networks (LANs) and increase the IT security risk to all NOAA systems, including networks.

• Cost:

Activity Project Managers orSubject Matter Experts

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Each Outyear

Elimination of Single Points of Failure in NOAA’s Silver Spring Metro Center (SSMC) Network Infrastructure

John Kyler, Bob Brunner $0.8M $0.8M $1.0M $1.0M $1.0M $1.0M

Elimination of Single Points of Failure in Public Web Services

John Unekis, John Kyler, Chi Kang

$1.2M $1.4M $0.9M $0.9M $0.9M $0.9M

Elimination of Single Points of Failure in Electronic Mail Services (including migration to Commerce-wide common email system)

John Unekis, Don Holtzer

$13.0M $4.8M $4.8M $4.8M $4.8M $4.8M


Compliance with Guidance:Transfer of LO CIO Operating Funds


BENEFITS AND RISKS

(FY$M): FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13Current Program 0 0 0 0 0Program Adjustment 14.9 14.9 14.9 14.9 14.9Proposed Program 14.9 14.9 14.9 14.9 14.9

CAPABILITY:QUANTITY:Input Capacity Change FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13None 0 0 0 0 0

Output Capacity Change FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13IT Services MET MET MET MET MET


GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Information Technology Services CAPABILITIES: IT Security, Enterprise Network

Operations, Enterprise Architecture, IT Support for Administrative Systems, IT Administration and Regulation

REQUIREMENT: Transfer of Line Office (LO) CIO Operating Budgets from LO Headquarters Program to IT Services Program

DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: Transfer of funding will allow the IT Services Program to improve performance through the IT Administration and Regulation, IT Security, Enterprise Network Operations, Enterprise Architecture, and IT Support for Administrative Systems capabilities.

PERFORMANCE MEASURES: IT Security Incidents Network and Application Services Availability, Capability Maturity Model Score

If program adjustment is made: Provide centralized administration and management of IT Services across NOAA

Provide C&A dashboard capability 2009 NEMIS data storage acquisition, product inventories, analysis,

& Suite 2 dashboard instruments 2009 Complete phase 2 of the consolidated electronic mail system,

including complete redundancy and replication of data for all users 2010

Complete hardening of the SSMC backbone and NOAAnet in order to produce a 99.99% uptime network 2013


Compliance with Guidance:Transfer of Funding from OCIO to PS/ITS

Information Technology Services Program (MS-ITS)

CURRENT PROGRAM - FUNDING ($K)[including Transfer of LO CIO Operating Funds]

Amount from LO CIO

Capability FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13

MS-ITS-ADI IT Administration and Regulation 1650 1650 1650 4052 4052 4052 4052 4052 2402

MS-ITS-SEI IT Security 1000 3050 3050 7637 7637 7637 7637 7637 2587

MS-ITS-NET Enterprise Network Operations 5123 5123 5123 9760 9760 9760 9760 9760 4637

MS-ITS-ARC Enterprise Architecture 216 216 216 2263 2263 2263 2263 2263 1047

MS-ITS-SPT IT Support for Administrative Systems 15961 16132 16132 20515 20515 19661 19661 19661 4201

TOTAL FUNDING 23950 26171 26171 44227 44227 43373 43373 43373 14874


Compliance with Guidance:Recommendation on CBS Funding

Shortfall

CBS Current Shortfall:CBS Requirements($ in millions)

FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Comments

Server Consolidation 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.5 0.0 - Supports NOAA contribution to Census;

- Cost of software license maintenance;

- Telecommunication cost to Census

New Accounting System .9 .9 5.9 27.0 34.0 - Supports study for new system

- Conversion of Data; Training

- Implementation of new system;

Enhancements to System

3.5 2.0 2.0 1.3 1.3 -HS-PD12

(modifying CBS, Data warehouse, Travel Manager, etc to accept authorization from this card)

- NOAA Integration and Data Storage

- Full implementation of Commitment Accounting

- Migration to DOC web portal

Total CBS Shortfall $6.8 $5.3 $10.4 $30.8 $35.3


Compliance with Guidance:Recommendation on CBS Funding

Shortfall

Recommendations for Funding CBS Shortfall:CBS Requirement Alternatives for Funding ShortfallServer Consolidation •Reduce services to NOAA customers

•Reduce funding to the Information Technology Center (ITC)

New Accounting System •CBS Base Funding Increase-Transitional cost associated with moving to new DOC consolidated accounting system exceed the current CBS base funding

•Eliminate current services to NOAA customers- Stop funding for all maintenance and administrative efforts, help desk support, system testing and training efforts on the current system

Enhancements to System •Eliminate support for HS-PD12 within CBS suite of applications

- Suspend modification to accommodate security verification

•Reduce services to NOAA customer- Decrease access to timely financial data


Compliance with Guidance:Update Capabilities Profile

Financial Services

ITEM FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 TOTALS

MS-FIN Accounting Services and Funds Management 23,347 23,347 23,347 23,347 23,347 23,347

MS-FIN Develop and Defend Budget 1,638 1,638 1,638 1,638 1,638 1,638

MS-FIN NMA Resource Management 9,831 9,831 9,796 9,796 9,796 9,796

MS-FIN PPBES Management Information System 4,380 4,380 4,380 4,380 4,380 4,380

MS-FIN NOAA Centralized Payments 34,425 34,425 34,425 `34,425 34,425 34,425

Total Current Program 73,621 73,621 73,586 73,586 73,586 73,586

ITEM FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 TOTALS

MS-FIN Accounting Services and Funds Management 26,411 26,411 26,411 26,411 26,411 26,411

MS-FIN Develop and Defend Budget 1,743 1,743 1,743 1,743 1,743 1,743

MS-FIN NMA Resource Management 9,040 9,040 9,040 9,005 9,005 9,005

MS-FIN PPBES Management Information System 2,002 2,002 2,002 2,002 2,002 2,002

MS-FIN NOAA Centralized Payments 34,425 34,425 34,425 `34,425 34,425 34,425

Total Current Program 73,621 73,621 73,586 73,586 73,586 73,586

Current Capabilities Profile:

Updated Current Capabilities Profile:


Above Core Quads:Tier 3 & 4 (ORF); Tier 2 (PAC)


GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Administrative Services CAPABILITY: Office of the NOAA Chief Administrative

Officer REQUIREMENT: Business Process Reengineering (BPR) DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: Designate continuing

direct funding for the Business Process Reengineering effort. BPR depends on personnel detailed from the Line and Staff Offices, and direct billing of the LO/SO programs for staffing and funding. This adjustment would provide direct funding for contract support.

PERFORMANCE MEASURES: “As Is” evaluations completed “To Be” evaluations completed Recommendations implemented

Program Support Above Core (T-3): Business Process Reengineering


BENEFITS AND RISKS

(FY$M ): FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13Current Program 0.184 0.184 0.000 0.000 0.000Program Adjustment 1.000 0.750 0.000 0.000 0.000Proposed Program 1.184 0.934 0.000 0.000 0.000

CAPABILITY:




FY09 – Financial Services – Phase 3; Information Technology – Phase 4 FY10 – Financial Services – Phase 4 FY11-FY13 – No projects scheduledThe assumption is that the Safety and Facilities Programs have already completed internal BPR activities.

Would provide the ability to: Complete the reengineering effort on any remaining

financial and administrative service areas Conduct continuous improvement for financial and

administrative processes already reengineered. BPR activities risk delay during Government

Continuing Resolution due to reliance on contractor funding in 1st quarter



BENEFITS AND RISKS

(FY$M ): FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13Current Program 0 0 0 0 0Program Adjustment 2.35 2.4 2.5 2.5 0Proposed Program 2.35 2.4 2.5 2.5 0

CAPABILITY:




Program Support Above Core (T-3): Commerce Business System (CBS)

Server Consolidation



Server Consolidation Project PERFORMANCE MEASURES:


FY 2008 Commerce Business System moves from IT Services to

Census Data Center

FY 2009 Consolidation of CBS technology architecture Supports NOAA contribution to Census facility Ensure software license maintenance for software

installed at Census

Ensures software license maintenance for software installed at Census location

Consolidates CBS technology architecture Without enhancements to the current CBS system,

NOAA managers will not have access to timely financial data necessary to make informed programmatic decisions

Supports the NOAA contribution to Census facility and includes telecommunications cost for developers and administrators



BENEFITS AND RISKS

(FY$M ): FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13Current Program 0 0 0 0 0Program Adjustment 3.5 2 2 1.3 1.3Proposed Program 3.5 2 2 1.3 1.3

CAPABILITY:




Program Support Above Core (T-3): Commerce Business System Funds Control Enhancements



Enhancement to Commerce Business System PERFORMANCE MEASURES:


FY 2009 – FY 2013 Implementation of commitment accounting Staffing will be increased to meet accelerating reporting

requirements Migration to DOC Business web portal Implementation of Reimbursable module to monitor and

control Reimbursable funding Development of an automated accounting module

To improve management of funding, NOAA needs to implement commitment accounting

Implementation of E-Travel will enable NOAA to meet the PMA requirement, which will simplify Federal travel management

Without enhancements to the current CBS system, NOAA managers will not have access to timely financial data necessary to make informed programmatic decisions


Program Support Above Core (T-3): Technology Refresh

& Desktop Management


BENEFITS AND RISKS ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES






REQUIREMENT: Technology Refresh & Desktop Management

DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: Technology Refresh & Desktop Management for NOAA Computer Incident Response Team, Information Technology Center, Network Operations Center, Web Operations Center, Messaging Operations Center, OS LAN / Systems Support, and OCIO

PERFORMANCE MEASURES: IT Security Incidents, Network and Application Services Availability, Capability Maturity Model Score

If program adjustment is made: Meet recommended system lifecycle refresh requirements

If program adjustment is not made: Extend system lifecycle refresh period from 3 years to

5 years Extend timelines and scale back functional

requirements for current projects

Technology Refresh Oct 2008 – Sep 2013 Desktop Management Oct 2008 – Sep 2013


Program Support Above Core (T-3): Human Resources Information System





QUANTITY:Input Capacity Change FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13Funding ($K) 1,500 500 500 500 500


GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Workforce Management CAPABILITY: HR Programs REQUIREMENT: BPR recommendation; e-Gov Initiative DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:

HRIS is an enhancement to the current NFC payroll system that supports automated processing of HR actions (e.g., SF-52-s)

PERFORMANCE MEASURES: % of actions resulting in processing errors Hiring cycle time

FY 07-08: Work with DOC and NFC on systems requirements and develop implementation plan

FY 09: Implement HRIS FY 10-13: Maintain system license

If Adjustment made, HR actions can be initiated in LO/COs, automatically routed for approval and action, and automatically fed into the NFC system. This will reduce hiring cycle time, lost paperwork, processing errors due to rekeying and use of drop-down menus.

If Adjustment not made, BPR recommendations will not be maximized and current situation will continue.



GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Administrative Services CAPABILITY: CAO, AICIM, LOG REQUIREMENT: Mandated Administrative Services DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: A number of unfunded

mandates have been imposed on MS-ADS that have strained existing resources to the point where other critical services are being degraded. Dedicated funding and FTE for these activities are required

PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Deemed Export requirements are met. Personal Property program and audit requirements are

met. FOIA requirements are met. Audit Liaison requirements are met.

Program Support Above Core (T-3): Mandated Administrative Services


BENEFITS AND RISKS


CAPABILITY:




Failure to provide additional FTE and funding will result in continued degradation of existing services, many of which are critical.

Dedicated FTE and resources will ensure NOAA’s ability to meet legal and regulatory mandates, both timely and effectively, and achieve clean audits.

Contracts require funding in first quarter each year for FOIA and Audits: 1Q, FY 09-13

Hire an additional 5 FTE for Personal Property Branch (2- HI, 1-SEA, 1-Norfolk, 1-SSMC ): 2Q, FY09

Establish recurring training and conferences for Deemed Export implementation; 2Q-3Q, FY09-13




GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Facilities CAPABILITY: Sustainment REQUIREMENT: Funding of Sustainment costs at WRC-

Seattle and NOAA’s Pacific Region Center (PRC), Honolulu, HI

DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: To provide these NOAA-owned facilities with proper

level of sustainment funding in accordance with Facilities Business Model. Above core funding is requested to establish.

PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Improved inventory FCI


CAPABILITY:



Proper sustainment investment increases building’s useful life, defers or prevents restoration expenses.

Failure to fund results in deferment of needed actions, degrading facilities condition.

Program Support Above Core (T-3): Corporate Sustainment


GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Administrative Services CAPABILITY: Logistics REQUIREMENT: Funding of Building Management

Operations at NOAA’s Western Regional Center (WRC), Seattle, WA

DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: The WRC is a NOAA-owned facility. In recent years

there has been significant increases in the operational costs without a concurrent increase in funding. Above core funding is requested to establish dedicated resources for WRC Operations.

PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Adequate funding for necessary building and facility

operations.

Program Support Above Core (T-3): Western Regional Center (WRC)

Operations


BENEFITS AND RISKS


CAPABILITY:




Most service contracts require initial funding in first quarter of each year

Most service contracts for Building Management are “Must Pay”

Required but unfunded payments produce a shortfall for other critical Program Support requirements.

Services to NOAA Programs will be reduced or Direct Billed, causing unacceptable loss of capability.

Failure to fund results in denial or deferment of needed actions, degrading facilities and services.


Program Support Above Core (T-3): OneNOAA Web Presence





Output Capacity Change FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13Capability Maturity Model Score for Enterprise Architecture Process 4 5 5 5 5

GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Information Technology Services CAPABILITY: Enterprise Architecture REQUIREMENT: OneNOAA Web Presence DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: Implement enterprise-level

web management PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Capability Maturity Model Score

FY2009-13 Implement Plan to Consolidate and Organize NOAA’s Web Assets

Evaluate NOAA-wide search capability Conduct ongoing information asset inventory and evaluate

against baseline Reorganize NOAA Web offerings in thematic approach,

independent of organizational structure Coordinate with other Federal agencies to ensure customer-

centric coordination and presentation of information Begin migration to MyNOAA concept

Create unified portal providing seamless access to NOAA internal and external information

Create role-based security model to ensure integrity to sensitive information assets

Provide localized and personalized information to Web customers

Begin implementation of Web Server Consolidation

If program adjustment is made: Improve access to NOAA products and services Meet stakeholder needs Achieve NOAA-level web management for internet and

intranet Integrate web communications to NOAA business process Create functional content and technical web architectures

with single-point access to NOAA’s vast web offerings Secure funding for long-term support and maintenance of

the NOAA Web presence If program adjustment is not made:

Recommendations from post-Isabel and post-Katrina service assessments will remain unaddressed

Continuation of disjointed operation of NOAA web holdings Potentially conflicting information posted to web


Program Support Above Core (T-4):NOAAnet Single Enterprise Network


BENEFITS AND RISKS





GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Information Technology Services CAPABILITY: Enterprise Network Operations REQUIREMENT: NOAAnet Single Enterprise Network DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: Implement common NOAA

communications Infrastructure and consolidate 9 legacy networks PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Network and Application Services

Availability

Complete the transition of all NOAA Line Office Wide Area Networks (WANs) to the NOAAnet Single Enterprise Network

2009 Provide multiple transparent external connections throughout

the nation, by maintaining up to 4 ISP large scale connections 2011

Complete the hardening of NOAAnet in order to produce a 99.99% uptime network 2013

If program adjustment is made: $30M cost avoidance over first 7 years – network transport only;

cost avoidance will be applied to enhancements Meets NOAA’s requirements and supports NOAA’s mission

performance Centrally-managed NOAA network (24x7 operations center) Reuse and share common services (i.e., email, videoconferencing,

administrative & desktop applications, corporate & programmatic operations, intranet)

Common Security Infrastructure supports single C&A and provides secure environments (i.e., communities of interest) for user communities

If program adjustment is not made: Legacy networks approaching end-of-life; more expensive to sustain Uncoordinated redundancy at shared locations increases costs Loss of connectivity at a hub location disables connectivity at

dependent remote locations Complete COOP failover is difficult or impossible when backup sites

rely on dedicated or separate networks Dependencies:

Implementation requires the redistribution of financial resources from other Goals/Programs

Intrusion Detection System (IDS) to be provided by NOAA Computer Incident Response Team (N-CIRT)



BENEFITS AND RISKS

(FY$M ): FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13Current Program 0 0 0 0 0Program Adjustment 0.9 0.9 5.9 37 34Proposed Program 1 1 5.9 37 34

CAPABILITY:




Program Support Above Core (T-4): Commerce Business System – New DOC Accounting System



New Accounting System PERFORMANCE MEASURES:

Improved funds control Accurate and timely financial information Federal E-Travel Management tool

FY 2009 – FY 2013 Study/compete for new DOC accounting system Implementation Transition to new DOC accounting system

Supports implementation to new accounting system

Enables conversion of data, support for new system and data warehouse training



BENEFITS AND RISKS


Program Support Above Core (T-4): Elimination of Single Points of Failure

(Electronic Mail Services)

GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Information Technology Services CAPABILITY: Enterprise Network Operations REQUIREMENT: Elimination of Single Points of Failure in Electronic Mail

Services (including migration to Commerce-wide common email system) DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: Implement common email infrastructure

that includes redundancy with built-in failover PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Network and Application Services Availability

Complete phase 2 of the consolidated electronic mail system, including complete redundancy and replication of data for all users 2010




If program adjustment is not made: NOAA messaging operations (a primary communication

mechanism throughout the enterprise) will become unavailable during a power failure or when construction/utility equipment (e.g., backhoe) disrupts the email service connection.

Reduce the plans for email system redundancy and provide replication of email only for priority users.

DOC will continue to lack a common electronic mail system across all its agencies/bureaus.

Dependencies: Migration planning has been underway since January 2006, when

DOC alerted NOAA to begin projecting costs for the transition to a Commerce-wide common email system.

DOC has not provided clear FY09 Budget guidance with respect to the migration to a Commerce-wide common email system.

NOAA currently operates and maintains a distributed email system with multiple single points of failure, and utilizes the Thunderbird email application for more than 19,000 users, but will need funding to support Commerce’s move to a common platform without single points of failure.

On 9/21/06, as part of its Electronic Mail Study, DOC initiated a mandatory data call on e-mail costs for all bureaus; purpose: to obtain costs of email at each Operating Unit; use of data: analysis to support the business case. NOAA submitted data on 9/26/06.


Program Support Above Core (T-4): ADR Program



(FY$M): FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13Current Program 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2Program Adjustment 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3Proposed Program 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.51CAPABILITY: Strategic Management of Human Capital

QUANTITY:Input Capacity Change FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13Funds ($K) 275 275 275 275 275

Output Capacity Change FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13Mediator Workshops 2 2 2 2 2Interventions 12 12 12 12 12Mediations 35 35 35 35 35

Outreach sessions 12 12 12 12 12

GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Workforce Management CAPABILITY: Strategic Management of Human Capital REQUIREMENT: Support for NO FEAR Act DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:

Fund NOAA’s National Alternative Dispute Resolution Program

PERFORMANCE MEASURES: TBD (significant measures difficult to develop due to

confidential nature of ADR program and inability to set targets for number of mediations requested)

WFMO manages the NOAA National ADR Program including intake and mediation management, mediator training, outreach, and interventions.

Conducting 35 successful mediations each year saves NOAA $1.750K net each year.

Funding buys mediator travel, training for mediator cadre, outreach materials, travel and materials to conduct interventions.

NOAA saves an average of $50K net on every successful mediation or $7 for every dollar invested in the ADR Program.

If Adjustment not made, ADR will continue to be dependent on managers’ willingness/ability to provide travel or ask FMCs for funding (which they are often reluctant to do); NOAA will lose money to continued conflicts and adversarial proceedings; minimal outreach can occur with reduction in Program use; new mediators will not be trained or current cadre kept up to date.



Program Support Above Core (T-4): Corporate Recruitment Program




CAPABILITY: Strategic M anagement Human Capital

QUANTITY:Input Capacity Change FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13FTE 1 1 1 1 1Funds ($K) 210 210 210 210 210

Output Capacity Change FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13Corporate recuriment strategy Yes Yes Yes Yes YesRecruitment trips 9 9 9 9 9

GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Workforce Management CAPABILITY: Strategic Management of Human Capital REQUIREMENT: SES Summit; PMA DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:

Provide on-going support for a new FTE recently funded through FY 2008 and funding for modest NOAA outreach effort and recruitment materials

PERFORMANCE MEASURES: New hire quality Others TBD by new position

FY 07 Q1-Q2: Hire Recruitment Program Manager in WFMO

FY 07 Q3-Q4: Analyze NOAA recruitment issues; develop strategy to address issues; develop performance measures

FY 08: Fully implement recruitment strategy including training recruiter cadre and reviewing/revising NOAA recruitment materials

FY 09-13: Continue corporate recruitment program Funding: $145K for 1 FTE, $35K for recruitment travel,

$30K for recruitment materials

If Adjustment made, NOAA can implement and sustain the Corporate Recruitment Strategy to be developed in FY 07.

If Adjustment not made, WFMO may not have funding for new position established in FY 07 and funded through FY 08.

No dependencies on other programs.


GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Facilities CAPABILITY: Construction - Infrastructure REQUIREMENT: Real Property Asset Management DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: Replace current asset

management system, which is fragmented and inefficient, with state of the art product and capability

PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Improved Compliance with EO13327 Improved facility data for decision-making

Program Support Above Core (T-4): Real Property Asset Management


FY 2008 – Implement real property asset management system, and identify necessary linkages and data gaps

FY 2009 - Implement architecture and database structures (linking existing databases, and creating new data fields required by E.O. 13327)

FY 2010-12 - Ongoing maintenance and refinement

BENEFITS AND RISKS

(FY$M ): FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13Current Program 0 0 0 0 0


CAPABILITY:

QUANTITY:Input Capacity Change FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13Capacity (+/-) 0 0 0 0 0Capacity (+/-) 0 0 0 0 0Capacity (+/-) 0 0 0 0 0



• Improve data regarding facilities: conditions, hazardous materials, staffing, occupancy costs, age, replacement costs.

• Improved capacity for facility decision-making based on accurate facility data. Improved capacity for COOP and capital investment decisions.


Program Support Above Core (T-4): Employee Assistance Program



(FY$M ): FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13Current Program 0 0 0 0 0Program Adjustment 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3Proposed Program 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.30.6CAPABILITY: HR Programs


Output Capacity Change FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13NOAA employees served All All All All All

GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Workforce Management CAPABILITY: HR Programs REQUIREMENT: Public Law 99-570; 5 CFR part 792;

Executive Order 12564 require agencies to establish appropriate prevention, treatment, rehabilitative, and counseling services and programs for employees.

DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: Fund NOAA Employee Assistance Program (EAP)

PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Client satisfaction

EAP services provided by contractor, COR in WFMO Re-compete contract in FY 11

If Adjustment made, NOAA employees and their families will continue to receive professional counseling, guidance, and support from the EAP.

If Adjustment not made, the EAP contract cannot be funded unless it is funded through direct bill.

NOAA risks not meeting the mandate for agencies to have EAPs and also lessens the quality of work life and benefits available to employees.



Program Support Above Core (T-4): James D. Martin Worklife Center



(FY$M): FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13Current Program 0 0 0 0 0Program Adjustment 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1Proposed Program 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.10.2CAPABILITY: Managing Diversity


Output Capacity Change FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13Worklife Programs 12 12 12 12 12

GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Workforce Management CAPABILITY: Managing Diversity REQUIREMENT: NOAA requirement DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:

Fund James D. Martin Worklife Center PERFORMANCE MEASURES:

Client satisfaction Usage Human Capital Survey items

Worklife Center staffed by contract.

If Adjustment made, NOAA employees will continue to have access to resources to help balance work and personal lives (e.g., elder care or child care referrals, lactation facilities in Silver Spring, monthly seminars taped and placed on web site). Worklife programs are important for recruitment, retention, and morale.

If Adjustment not made, the Worklife Center may have to close and/or stop offering seminars and other professional services.



Program Support Above Core (T-4): Full FTE Funding

Required by Program Guidance


GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Administrative Services CAPABILITY: OCAO, AICIM, AMES, CRO, LOG REQUIREMENT: All Administrative Services Program

requirements DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:

MS-ADS has 101 approved NOAA billets which would be fully funded by this adjustment (includes Other Object Class funding, e.g., desk top technology refresh/support at $4.1K/position)

PERFORMANCE MEASURES: All MS-ADS performance measures

Program Support Above Core (T-4): Full Funding of ADS Federal FTE


BENEFITS AND RISKS

(FY$M ): FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13

Current Program 10.6 10.6 10.6 10.6 10.6Program Adjustment 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3


CAPABILITY: OCAO, AICIM , AM ES, CRO, LOG

QUANTITY:Input Capacity Change FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13All n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a


All 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%


If Adjustment made, Program will be able to meet enhanced performance metrics; train and reward staff; travel to carry out Program; maintain equipment; support and refresh desk top technology; buy supplies; improve quality of products and service; better retain staff.

If Adjustment not made, Program will continue to lose staff due to lack of funds for training, awards, supplies, equipment, and travel; quality of products and service may deteriorate; performance measures unlikely to be met.

Reduced dependencies on other programs

101 Fully-Funded Federal FTE Oct 2008 – Sep 2013 -- Program adjustment will provide additional funding for 10 FTE


GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Acquisition and Grants CAPABILITY: Acquisition processing services; financial

assistance processing services REQUIREMENT: All Acquisition and Grants Program


MS-AQP has 168 approved NOAA billets which would be fully funded by this adjustment (includes 22 vacant positions)

PERFORMANCE MEASURES: All MS-AQP performance measures including award

cycle time

Program Support Above Core (T-4): Full Funding of AQP Federal FTE


BENEFITS AND RISKS

(FY$M ): FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13

Current Program 13 13 13 13 13


Capability: Acquisition and financial assistance processing

QUANTITY:Input Capacity Change FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13Full funding ($K) 3,332 3,332 3,332 3,332 3,332


M eet processing cycle time 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES Funding buys ability to fill 22 vacant positions and

training, awards, supplies, travel, equipment, and other support for 168 employees.

FY 2009, Q1-Q2: Fill vacant positions





GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Facilities Program CAPABILITY: RPFLO, RPMD, PPMD, SECO REQUIREMENT: All Facilities Program requirements DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:

MS-FAC has 92 approved NOAA billets which would be fully funded by this adjustment (includes Other Object Class funding, e.g., desk top technology refresh/support at $4.1K/position)

PERFORMANCE MEASURES: All MS-FAC performance measures

Program Support Above Core (T-4): Full Funding of FAC Federal FTE


BENEFITS AND RISKS

(FY$M ): FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13



CAPABILITY: RPFLO, RPM D, PPM D, SECO

QUANTITY:Input Capacity Change FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13All n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a


All 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES If Adjustment made, Program will be able to meet

enhanced performance metrics; train and reward staff; travel to carry out Program; maintain equipment; support and refresh desk top technology; buy supplies; improve quality of products and service; better retain staff.


Reduced dependencies on other programs

92 Fully-Funded Federal FTE Oct 2008 – Sep 2013

-- Program adjustment will provide additional funding for 4 FTE


Program Support Above Core (T-4): Full Funding of FIN Federal FTE



(FY$M ): FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13



CAPABILITY: ACT, BUD, M IS, RM A, PAY

QUANTITY:Input Capacity Change FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13All 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0


All 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Financial Services CAPABILITY: Accounting Services and Funds Management,

Develop and Defend Budget, NMA Resource Management, PPBES MIS, NOAA Centralized Payments

REQUIREMENT: All Financial Services Program requirements DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:

Provides adequate funding to support salaries and benefits for 282 federal FTE in the Financial Services Program

PERFORMANCE MEASURES: All MS-FIN performance measures



282 Fully-Funded Federal FTE Oct 2008 – Sep 2013 255 FTE’s funded at Current Program level 27 FTE’s funded with Program Adjustment


Program Support Above Core (T-4): Full Funding of ITS Federal FTE





REQUIREMENT: Full Funding of Federal FTE DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: Provide adequate

funding to support salaries and benefits for 107 federal FTE in the IT Services Program

PERFORMANCE MEASURES: IT Security Incidents, Network and Application Services Availability, Capability Maturity Model Score

If program adjustment is made: IT Services Program will be better positioned to accomplish its mission, and provided adequate support to the NOAA Mission Goals

If program adjustment is not made: More overtime Slots will remain vacant as federal employees retire or

move on to other career opportunities Extend timelines and scale back functional

requirements for current projects

107 Fully-Funded Federal FTE Oct 2008 – Sep 2013

-- Program Adjustment of funding for 19 FTE

(FY$M): FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13Current Program (88 FTE) 12.7 12.7 12.7 12.7 12.7Program Adjustment (19 FTE) 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7Proposed Program 15.4 15.4 15.4 15.4 15.4

CAPABILITY: All 5 IT Services Program CapabilitiesQUANTITY:Input Capacity Change FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13None 0 0 0 0 0




BENEFITS AND RISKS


QUANTITY:Input Capacity Change FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13Full funding ($K) 1,888 1,888 1,888 1,888 1,888Desk-top Technology Refresh ($K) 697 697 697 697 697

Output Capacity Change FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13M eet hiring cycle time goal 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%M eet processing accuracy goal 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%Support BPR implementaion Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

CAPABILITY: HR Programs, Strategic M anagement of Human Capital, M anaging Diversity


Program Support Above Core (T-4): Fully Fund WMP Positions

GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Workforce Management CAPABILITY: HR Programs, Strategic Management of

Human Capital, Managing Diversity REQUIREMENT: All Workforce Management Program


MS-WMP has 170 approved NOAA billets which would be fully funded by this adjustment (includes desk top technology refresh/support at $4.1K/position)

PERFORMANCE MEASURES: All MS-WMP performance measures including hiring

cycle time

Funding buys ability to fill 9 vacant positions and training, awards, supplies, travel, equipment, and other support for 170 employees.

FY 2009, Q1-Q2: Fill vacant positions


If Adjustment not made, Program will continue to lose staff due to lack of funds for training, awards, supplies, equipment, and travel; quality of products and service may deteriorate; performance measures unlikely to be met; BPR implementation may not be able to be sustained.

No dependencies on other programs.


Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2):Tier 2—PAC

• Individual Facility Projects– Additional Requirements (within 100%)– Unprioritized– No business case analysis conducted to validate

requirement, costs, or preferred solution




Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): Summary of Remaining Requirements

GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Facilities CAPABILITY: All REQUIREMENT: Summary of Remaining Above Core

Requirements DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: Consolidation of

responses to FY09 Data Call

PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Improved FCI

(FY$M ): FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13


Program Adjustment 92.3 113.2 132.8 79.2 50.2


CAPABILITY:



See individual project write-ups See individual project write-ups



Project Title LO FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 Total

Replace NOAA Aircraft Hangar NMAO 5000 5000 55000 0 0 65000

NDBC Office and Industrial Building Facilities NWS 20650 625 0 0 0 21275

Hangar for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs)/Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) OAR 2300 2300 0 0 0 4600

WFO Construction (in lieu of lease: Taunton, Fort Worth, Tulsa, Little Rock, Topeka) NWS 1139 829 8400 22385 1730 34483

WFO Construction (w/o Leases) NWS 0 4600 10200 10200 7700 32700

NWS Facilities Maintenance Funding Shortfall NWS 10210 10300 10310 10280 10610 51710

Harden NWS FacilitiesNWS 7100 12168 5980 25248

NMSP Shortfall NOS 925 5825 6375 10400 11945 35470

Construct New Main Building, Barrow Baseline Observatory, Barrow AK OAR 325 2435 0 0 0 2760

Construction of Office and Support Facilities, Mauna Loa Baseline Observatory, Hilo Hawaii OAR 0 706 3675 0 0 4381

Boulder Atmospheric Observatory (BAO) OAR 0 2360 0 0 0 2360

REPLACEMENT FOR "ANNEX" BUILDING FOR ARL'S ATMOSPHERIC TURBULENCE AND DIFFUSION DIVISION OAR 381 2712 606 0 0 3699

F-13 Woods Hole Lab Modernization, including Aquarium NMFS 8395 2180 0 0 0 10575


Project Title LO FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 Total

Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory (GLERL) Main Facility OAR 0 11200 0 0 0 11200

F-5 Sandy Hook Dock Construction NMFS 2880 0 0 0 0 2880

F-10 Mulkilteo Facility Replacement Project NMFS 925 8060 12850 0 0 21835

F-11 Narragansett Laboratory Expansion and Restoration NMFS 7380 2250 0 0 0 9630

F-14 Milford Laboratory Expansion and Restoration NMFS 4735 7145 0 0 0 11880

Newport Survey Gear and Net Maintenance Building NMFS 4420 0 0 0 0 4420

F-16 Santa Cruz Office and Laboratory Expansion NMFS 2200 0 0 0 0 2200

F-17 Pribilof Islands Facilities Modernization and Expansion NMFS 1475 9775 0 0 0 11250

Lake Michigan Field Station Laboratory Expansion and Upgrade OAR 0 3500 0 0 0 3500

Wallops CDAS Capital Acquisition Program NESDIS 1733 8552 11121 18375 11489 51270

Fairbanks CDAS Capital Acquisition Program NESDIS 8911 10534 7161 6877 4222 37705

Emergency Power and Cooling to Support NOAA Boulder's Center of Excellence for Operations & Research NESDIS 1200 1100 1100 700 2500 6600

92284 113156 132778 79217 50196 467631


(Continued)


GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Facilities CAPABILITY: Construction - Recapitalization REQUIREMENT: NMAO Aircraft Hangar DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:

Construction of Aircraft Hangar at Tampa to replace hangar being retrieved by DoD due to BRAC


Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): NMAO Aircraft Hangar


BENEFITS AND RISKS


CAPABILITY:




PlanningFY09

DesignFY10

ConstructionFY11

Replaces outdated and unsafe dispersed existing buildings

Allows for potential addition of third P3 aircraft Highly inefficient operations and excessive

maintenance delays will impact NOAA programs if the aircraft are not located in the same area.

Risks: Alternatives limited


GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Facilities CAPABILITY: Construction - Recapitalization REQUIREMENT: Hangars for UAVs DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:

Construction/acquisition of Hangars for UAVs; possible renovation of existing hangars to accommodate acquisition of unmanned aerial vehicles

PERFORMANCE MEASURES: UAVs have enormous potential to be NOAA’s

suborbital observing system serving mission needs for ecosystems, climate, weather and water, and commerce and transportation

Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2):

UAV Hangars


BENEFITS AND RISKS

(FY$M): FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13Current Program 0 0 0 0 0

Program Adjustment 2.3 2.3 0 0 0Proposed Program 2.3 2.3 0 0 0

CAPABILITY:




Acquisition/Renovation FY09 – FY10

Protection of aircraft from high winds and adverse weather

Addition of new capability High readiness level for time sensitive operations Integration of mission and support functions Risk: Finding available hangars


GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Facilities CAPABILITY: Construction - Recapitalization REQUIREMENT: NDBC Office and Industrial Building DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: modernize and

expand the NWS National Data Buoy Center’s (NDBC), industrial maintenance and office facilities at Stennis Space Center, Mississippi


Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): NDBC Office Expansion


BENEFITS AND RISKS

(FY$M): FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13Current Program 0 0 0 0 0Program Adjustment 20.7 0.6 0 0 0Proposed Program 20.7 0.6 0 0 0

CAPABILITY:




Warehouse Planning and DesignFY09

Warehouse ConstructionFY10

Sandblast DesignFY11

Sandblast ConstructionFY11

Office Design and Construction FY11-FY13

Increased Buoy Maintenance Capacity IOOS Support


GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Facilities CAPABILITY: Construction - Recapitalization REQUIREMENT: NWS WFO/RFC Lease Conversions DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:

Construction PERFORMANCE MEASURES:

Improved FCI

Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): NWS Lease Conversions


BENEFITS AND RISKS


CAPABILITY:




Planning FY09 – FY10

Design FY10 – FY11

Construction FY11 – FY12

Lower Life Cycle Costs Less uncertainty; more flexibility Risks/barriers to implementation: Contractor and

Real Property Availability


GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Facilities CAPABILITY: Construction - Recapitalization REQUIREMENT: Fund remaining NWS Construction


Construction PERFORMANCE MEASURES:

Improved FCI

Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): NWS Construction Shortfall


BENEFITS AND RISKS

(FY$M): FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13Current Program 12.7 5.6 0.0 0.0 0.0Program Adjustment 13.5 10.2 10.2 10.2 7.7Proposed Program 0.8 4.6 10.2 10.2 7.7

CAPABILITY:




Barrow WSO/HousingFY09

Nome Housing FY10

Cold Bay WSO/HousingFY11

Bethel WSOFY11

Valdez Housing FY12

Yakutat HousingFY12

• Provides safe and compliant work and living environment for employees


GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Facilities CAPABILITY: Operations & Maintenance;

Sustainment REQUIREMENT: NWS Facilities Maintenance DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: To bring the

program up to its 100% Requirement and reduce maintenance backlog; address cyclic replacements deferred due to lack of funding; ensure ongoing service contracts are in place



NWS Facilities Maintenance Shortfall


BENEFITS AND RISKS


CAPABILITY:




Reduce existing backlog FY09-FY11

Perform Cyclic Replacements FY09-FY12

Add missing service contracts FY09-FY10

Improved Inventory FCI Extended Life Cycle/Useful Life Impact if program adjustment is not made: Portfolio

degradation


GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Facilities CAPABILITY: Recapitalization REQUIREMENT: Harden NWS Facilities DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: Replace

Brownsville and Lake Charles WFOs

PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Improved Capability to withstand Hurricane

conditions

Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): Harden NWS Facilities


BENEFITS AND RISKS


CAPABILITY:




PlanningFY09

DesignFY10


• Provides capability to sustain operations during hurricane events


GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Facilities CAPABILITY: Construction REQUIREMENT: NMSP Shortfall DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: Facilities

recapitalization for several NMS sites, upgrades of Visitors Centers and admin buildings, improvement of exhibtry.



NMSP Shortfall


BENEFITS AND RISKS


CAPABILITY:




Crissy Field Recapitalize FY09 – FY12

Key West Sea WallFY09

Upper Keys OfficeFY10

Santa Cruz Visitors Center FY10 – FY12

Upper Keys Visitors Center FY11 – FY12

OCNMS Admin Bldg FY12 – FY13

FBNMS Bldg FY12 – FY13

Leverages partnership with National Park Service to minimize costs at potentially unaffordable locations

Improved public education and outreach capability


GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Facilities CAPABILITY: Construction - Recapitalization REQUIREMENT: Barrow Baseline Observatory DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: construct a new

main observatory building at the NOAA Barrow, Alaska, Atmospheric Baseline Observatory

PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Improved FCI Increased monitoring capability


Barrow Baseline Observatory


BENEFITS AND RISKS


CAPABILITY:




PlanningFY09

DesignFY09

ConstructionFY10

Sustains critical atmospheric and monitoring research capability

Allows for expansion of cooperative programs Risk: Alternatives limited


GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Facilities CAPABILITY: Construction - Recapitalization REQUIREMENT: Mauna Loa Baseline Observatory DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: To construct a

5,000 ft2 office and support facility for the Mauna Loa Observatory (MLO), Hilo, Hawaii for 10 staff and up to three visiting scientists and students; current accommodations substandard.



Mauna Loa Baseline Observatory


BENEFITS AND RISKS


CAPABILITY:




PlanningFY09

DesignFY09

ConstructionFY10

GSA Renovation and Lease Increases very Expensive and require Two Moves

Free Land Available for New Building Key Stations for Climate Change Monitoring


GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Facilities CAPABILITY: REQUIREMENT: Boulder Atmospheric Observatory DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: purchase of the full

160 acre quarter-section of land

PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Long term Cost savings of land ownership

Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): Boulder Atmospheric Observatory Land

Acquisition


BENEFITS AND RISKS



CAPABILITY:




Acquisition FY09

• Potential life cycle cost savings of $1.5M over leasing alternative

• Sustainment of unique tower measurement capabilities


GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Facilities CAPABILITY: Construction - Recapitalization REQUIREMENT: ARL – ATDD Oak Ridge DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: To construct

replacement building for two 35 year old temporary triple wide trailers



ARL ATDD Oak Ridge


BENEFITS AND RISKS


CAPABILITY:




PlanningFY09

DesignFY09

ConstructionFY10

• Improved working conditions• Currently Housed in Temporary, 35 Year Old Triple

Wide Trailers• Conditions poor: Humidity, Mildew and Leaks


GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Facilities CAPABILITY: REQUIREMENT: Woods Hole Lab Modernization,

including aquarium DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: The proposed

structure is a combination office and laboratory building which would house staff of the Northeast Fisheries Science Center (NEFSC) Woods Hole Laboratory.



Woods Hole Lab Modernization


BENEFITS AND RISKS



CAPABILITY:




PlanningFY09

DesignFY09

Construction FY09 - FY10

• NOAA-dedicated, high profile and popular education center in one of the world’s most recognized and influential centers of marine science (Woods Hole), • Preservation and promotion of one of the agency’s heritage assets• Regional platform for NOAA outreach and education programs


GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Facilities CAPABILITY: REQUIREMENT: Great Lakes Environmental

Research Laboratory (GLERL) Recapitalization DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: Funding to

relocate to a 44,300 net square feet facility


Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): GLERL Recapitalization


BENEFITS AND RISKS


CAPABILITY:




TBDFY09

• Improved research capability

• Cost savings


GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Facilities CAPABILITY: REQUIREMENT: Sandy Hook Dock Construction DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: This project would

modernize Sandy Hook facilities. The facility will consist of a pier with wave attenuation, a floating ferry dock, a marine research support building, improved parking and a waiting area with restrooms.


Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): Sandy Hook Dock Construction


BENEFITS AND RISKS


CAPABILITY:




PlanningFY09

DesignFY09

ConstructionFY09

• Improved research capability

• Elimination of long species transports


GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Facilities CAPABILITY: REQUIREMENT: Mulkiteo Recapitalization DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: Project includes

replacing the current 10,000 sf building with a 16,000 sf seawater laboratory and seawater system, a separate 10,000 sf building to house marine research wet labs, and a 5,000 sf structures for equipment and boat storage


Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): Mulkiteo Lab Recapitalization


BENEFITS AND RISKS


CAPABILITY:




PlanningFY09

DesignFY09


• Impact Continued availability of this quality seawater critical for research supporting NOAA’s Ecosystem goals.

• Military Construction Authorization Act contained specific language that conveys NOAA Mukilteo Research Station property


GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Facilities CAPABILITY: REQUIREMENT: Narragansett Recapitalization

DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: A new wing is envisioned to replace 5 temporary trailer-type office-laboratory (TOL) modules located on the federal

property adjacent to the original Laboratory building.



Narragansett Lab Recapitalization


BENEFITS AND RISKS


CAPABILITY:




PlanningFY09

DesignFY09

Construction FY09 - FY10

• Supports enhanced scientific understanding of the role of the oceans, coasts, and atmosphere in the global ecosystem

• Keeps pace with the expanded responsibilities for providing scientific assessments


GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Facilities CAPABILITY: REQUIREMENT: Milford Recapitalization DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: construction of a

new Finfish Culture Facility on the property of the NEFSC Milford Laboratory at Milford, CT



Milford Lab Recapitalization


BENEFITS AND RISKS


CAPABILITY:




PlanningFY09

DesignFY09

ConstructionFY10

• Significantly enhances the culture of important commercial and recreational marine shellfish and finfish species over the next decade;

• Potential return on investment for aquaculture research is considerable


GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Facilities CAPABILITY: REQUIREMENT: Newport Survey Gear and Net

Maintenance Building DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: provides space

needed for large shipboard scientific gear and scientific trawl nets used in research



Newport Survey Gear and Net Maintenance Building


BENEFITS AND RISKS


CAPABILITY:




• Provides increased capability to conduct surveys and storage for scientific gear and equipment

Planning/FY09

DesignFY09

ConstructionFY09


GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Facilities CAPABILITY: REQUIREMENT: Santa Cruz Office Expansion DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: This project

would add square footage and facilities to the Santa Cruz lab that were approved in the original building design but cut back due to cost constraints in the initial construction process


Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): Santa Cruz Office Expansion


BENEFITS AND RISKS



CAPABILITY:




PlanningFY09

DesignFY09

ConstructionFY09

• Enables increased collaboration with partner agencies

• Increased rigor of laboratory analysis


GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Facilities CAPABILITY: REQUIREMENT: Pribilofs Island Modernization DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: Replaces vehicle

storage building and existing staff quarters; upgrades existing laboratory, constructs new research center


Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): Pribilofs Modernization and Expansion


BENEFITS AND RISKS



CAPABILITY:




PlanningFY09

DesignFY09

ConstructionFY10

• Supports expansion of mission• Brings additional researchers from NOAA and other

research groups to this area


GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Facilities CAPABILITY: REQUIREMENT: Lake Michigan Field Station

Laboratory Expansion and Upgrade DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: Expand the

existing laboratory building (Bldg. 3) by doubling the number of state-of-the-art laboratories



Lake Michigan Field Station Upgrade


BENEFITS AND RISKS


CAPABILITY:




PlanningFY09

DesignFY09

ConstructionFY10

Enhance NOAA's ecosystem research leadership role in the Great Lakes basin while also building new and continuing partnerships with Universities.


GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Facilities CAPABILITY: REQUIREMENT: Wallops CDAS Capital Acquisition

ProgramDESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: Complete

Renovation of facilities at Wallops in accordance with NESDIS Master Plan


Program Support Above Core (PAC T-2): Wallops CDAS


BENEFITS AND RISKS


CAPABILITY:




Utility Bldg AdditionFY10

Satellite Operations FY11-FY12

Antenna Repair FacilityFY12

Shipping/Receiving Facility FY13

• Renovate/Replace Deteriorating Satellite Support Facilities

• Reduce Risk of Satellite Disruption/Unavailability


GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Facilities CAPABILITY: Construction - Recapitalization REQUIREMENT: Fairbanks CDAS Capital Acquisition

Program DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: Complete

Renovation of facilities at Fairbanks in accordance with NESDIS Master Plan



Fairbanks CDAS


BENEFITS AND RISKS


CAPABILITY:




Transmitter ShelterFY10

Vehicle Maintenance and StorageFY10

Geophysical ObservatoryFY10

Support Facility FY11-fY12

• Renovate/Replace Deteriorating Satellite Support Facilities

• Reduce Risk of Satellite Disruption/Unavailability


GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Facilities CAPABILITY: Construction - Recapitalization REQUIREMENT: Boulder (DSRC) Emergency Power

and Cooling Requirements DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: Additional

emergency generator power and chilled water capacity are required to enable all NOAA scientists and operational & support staff of the NOAA Boulder, David Skaggs Research Center (DSRC) to continue with and expand their mission critical functions.



Boulder (DSRC) Upgrade


BENEFITS AND RISKS


CAPABILITY:




PlanningFY09

DesignFY09

ConstructionFY09

• Adequate equipment for IT support for basic mission accomplishment


Additional Backup Information

• Technical Adjustments• Compliance with Guidance Backup

Information• Integrated Priority Listings


Compliance with Guidance:Transfer of Facilities Labor

Funding from Admin Services



Logically aligns Facilities labor with its non-labor costs, providing clearer accounting of costs

Increases visibility into total capability costs Risks – some execution flexibility lost in sub-dividing

larger labor

GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Facilities CAPABILITY: Construction - Infrastructure REQUIREMENT: Alignment of Facilities Labor and

Non-Labor Costs DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT:

Transfer of funds from Admin Services to Facilities Program for the Real Property, Facilities and Logistics Office; Real Property Management; Project Planning and Management; and Safety and Environmental Compliance

PERFORMANCE MEASURES: None

(FY$M): FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13


Program Adjustment

MS-ADS -7.8 -7.8 -7.8 -7.8 -7.8

MS-ADS 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8


CAPABILITY:





BENEFITS AND RISKS

(FY$M ): FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13Current Program 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4Program Adjustment -0.4 -0.4 -0.4 -0.4 -0.4Proposed Program 0 0 0 0 0

CAPABILITY: M anaging Diversity

QUANTITY: Input Capacity Change FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13FTE moved to Other Capabilities 4 4 4 4 4Funding ($K) moved to other Capabilities442 442 442 442 442

Output Capacity Change FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13No change 0 0 0 0 0

(FY$M ): FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13Current Program 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8Program Adjustment 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4Proposed Program 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2

CAPABILITY: Strategic M anagement of Human Capital

QUANTITY:Input Capacity Change FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13FTE moved from M anaging Diversity 4 4 4 4 4Funding ($K) moved from M anaging Diversity442 442 442 442 442

Output Capacity Change FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13No change 0 0 0 0 0


Proposed Technical Adjustment: Merge Workforce Management Capabilities

GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Workforce Management CAPABILITY: Managing Diversity, Strategic Management

of Human Capital REQUIREMENT: The President’s Management Agenda

Human Capital Initiative includes diversity management as a critical success factor for developing a “Results Oriented Performance Culture”

DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: Merge the Managing Diversity capability into the Strategic Management of Human Capital capability

PERFORMANCE MEASURES: New measures being developed to align with OPM’s

new HCAAF metrics and performance indicators.

Revise Workforce Management Program Charter- Q2, 2007 (Workforce Management Program Manager)

Adjust PIRS

If Adjustment is made, Managing Diversity activities will be added to Strategic Management of Human Capital resulting in enhanced integration of Managing Diversity with NOAA’s Strategic Human Capital Management Plan.

If Adjustment is not made, the Managing Diversity capability will remain without a strong separate requirement and with minimal resources

No barriers to implementation or dependencies on other programs


Compliance with Guidance:CIO Council and Satellite Sub-Goal:

Enterprise IT Security• 10/6/06: IT Services Program Manager alerted CIO Council Chair that FY09 Fiscal & Programming

Guidance (Serial 3) instructs CIO Council to work with Satellite Sub-Goal Team Lead to identify requirement for providing Enterprise IT Security within NESDIS

– NESDIS CIO and/or NESDIS member of IT Security Committee may be the most appropriate coordinators

• 10/13/06: Requested & received clarification from Kevin Amos (PA&E)

– Satellite Sub-Goal:

• Address IT security issues (i.e., entire NESDIS requirement) in FY09 Satellite Sub-Goal Program Plan

– CIO Council:

• Work with Satellite Sub-Goal to ensure they understand and include all NESDIS IT Security requirements in their Program Plan

• Advise Gary Davis (Satellite Sub-Goal Team Lead) and his Program Plan development team throughout the process, to ensure they understand the full requirement and the best way to meet the IT security standards

• Review the FY09 Satellite Sub-Goal Program Plan and ensure that it includes the funds necessary to meet all IT security requirements for FY09-13

• Advise PA&E that the Program Plan meets IT security requirements, or that it does not and identify where it fails to meet the requirements; if the Program Plan does not meet all IT security requirements, then identify the risk to NOAA and potential consequences of the remaining IT security shortfalls

• 10/30/06: Deadline for FY09 Satellite Sub-Goal Program Plan


Proposed Technical Adjustment: Pacific Regional Center Project Support

Mission Goal Funds Transfer



GOAL: Program Support PROGRAM: Facilities CAPABILITY: Construction –

Recapitalization/Consolidation REQUIREMENT: Pacific Regional Center (PRC) DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: Transfer funds to

Program Support from Mission Goals for PRC project based on share of FTEs occupying facility per Serial 3 guidance


(FY$M ): FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13Current Program 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Program Adjustment 0.0 61.3 69.0 0.0 0.0 Ecosystems 0.0 50.9 57.2 0.0 0.0 C&T 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 Weather& Water 0.0 7.6 8.6 0.0 0.0 Climate 0.0 0.8 0.9 0.0 0.0 Satellites 0.0 1.7 1.9 0.0 0.0Proposed Program 0.0 61.3 69.0 0.0 0.0

CAPABILITY:



Regional Consolidation of critical assets in NOAA Facilities Portfolio

Note: Climate amount will be Above Core in the Climate Program Plan


GOAL: Program Support and Weather/Water PROGRAM: Facilities CAPABILITY: Construction REQUIREMENT: PRC DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: Transfer funds to

Program Support for Weather and Water Goal’s portion of the PRC project per Serial 3 guidance


Proposed Technical Adjustment: PRC Project Support

Weather/Water Funds Transfer


BENEFITS AND RISKS


CAPABILITY:



ACTIVITIES, SCHEDULE & MILESTONES Recapitalization of critical assets in NOAA Facilities

Portfolio


GOAL: Program Support and Climate PROGRAM: Facilities CAPABILITY: Construction REQUIREMENT: PRC DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: Transfer funds to

Program Support for Climate Goal’s portion of the PRC project



Climate Funds Transfer


BENEFITS AND RISKS


CAPABILITY:




Recapitalization of critical assets in NOAA Facilities Portfolio


GOAL: Program Support and Satellites PROGRAM: Facilities CAPABILITY: Construction REQUIREMENT: PRC DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: Transfer funds to

Program Support for Satellite Subgoal portion of the PRC project



Satellites Funds TransferPROGRAM ADJUSTMENT FUNDING

BENEFITS AND RISKS

(FY$M): FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13Current Program 0 0 0 0 0Program Adjustment 0 1.72 1.94 0 0Proposed Program 0 1.72 1.94 0 0

CAPABILITY:






Proposed Technical Adjustment: La Jolla Project Support

Ecosystems Funds Transfer



GOAL: Program Support and Ecosystems PROGRAM: Facilities CAPABILITY: Construction - Recapitalization REQUIREMENT: LaJolla DESCRIPTION OF ADJUSTMENT: Transfer funds

to Program Support from Ecosystems Goal for LaJolla


(FY$M ): FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13Current Program 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Program Adjustment 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ecosystems 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 C&T 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Weather& Water 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Climate 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Satellites 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Proposed Program 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

CAPABILITY:






• IPL Compliance: What we heard from other Offices.FY09 Integrated Priority Listing - CONSOLIDATION OF LINE OFFICE SUBMISSIONS - Program Support-Related

Office Priority

Line/Staff Office

Goal Program Capability (Description of Requirement) FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13

Total Program Support Sub-Goal Priority Items ($ M) 87.8 59.0 63.4 85.6 91.01 CAO Prog Spt MS-ADS NOAA Guard Service Contracts 7.0 7.2 7.4 7.7 7.92 CAO Prog Spt MS-ADS Western Regional Center (WRC) Operations 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.73 CAO Prog Spt MS-ADS Pacif ic Regional Center (PRC) Operations 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.7

4 CAO Prog Spt MS-FACSustainment - NOAA-ow ned Corporate Complexes (including PRC)

1.3 1.3 2.3 3.3 3.3

MS-WMPHuman Resources Programs: Homeland Security Presidential Directive (HSPD)-12

0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4

MS-ITS IT Security: HSPD-12 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBDMS-FAC TBD: HSPD-12 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBDMS-ADS TBD: HSPD-12 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

2 OCIO Prog Spt MS-ITSIT Security: Centralized Certif ication and Accreditation (C&A) Services

4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0

3 OCIO Prog Spt MS-ITSEnterprise Netw ork Operations: Elimination of Single Points of Failure in SSMC Netw ork Infrastructure, Public Web Services, and Electronic Mail Services

15.0 7.0 6.7 6.7 6.7

4 OCIO Prog Spt MS-ITS Enterprise Architecture: OneNOAA Web Presence 5.0 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2

5 OCIO Prog Spt MS-ITSEnterprise Netw ork Operations: NOAAnet Single Enterprise Netw ork

13.3 11.3 11.4 11.4 11.5

6 OCIO Prog Spt MS-ITSEnterprise Netw ork Operations: New Telephone System for NOAA Silver Spring Metro Center Campus

6.8 1.0 0.8 0.8 0.8

7 OCIO Prog Spt MS-ITSEnterprise Netw ork Operations: NOAA Help Desk Consolidation

15.9 8.2 6.7 6.9 7.1

1 Prog SptOCIO



• IPL Compliance: What we heard from other Offices.FY09 Integrated Priority Listing - CONSOLIDATION OF LINE OFFICE SUBMISSIONS - Program Support-Related

Office Priority

Line/Staff Office

Goal Program Capability (Description of Requirement) FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12

Total Program Support Sub-Goal Priority Items ($ M) 24.8 22.9 27.5 48.2

8 OCIO Prog Spt Prog SptIT Administration and Regulation: NOAA IT Program Management Off ice (PMO)

1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

9 OCIO Prog Spt MS-ITSEnterprise Architecture: Development & Management of the NOAA Enterprise Architecture

1.9 1.9 1.5 1.5

10 OCIO Prog Spt MS-ITSEnterprise Netw ork Operations: Telew ork in response to COOP (Continuity Of Operations Plan) Implementation

0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4

1 WFMO Prog Spt MS-WMP Fully fund 170 FTE (Serial 3) 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9

2 WFMO Prog Spt MS-WMPLearning Management System w ith full reporting and competency management capabilities (WFM BPR)

0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6

3 WFMO Prog Spt MS-WMPEmpow HR: NFC automated SF-52 system (WFM BPR)

TBD TBD TBD TBD

4 WFMO Prog Spt MS-WMP e-OPF (OPM requirement; Serial 3) 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.35 WFMO Prog Spt MS-WMP Develop competency models (Serial 3) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2

6 WFMO Prog Spt MS-WMP Fund NOAA ADR Program (Supports NO FEAR Act) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2

7 WFMO Prog Spt MS-WMP Implement HSPD-12 (5 FTE; Serial 3) 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4

8 WFMO Prog Spt MS-WMPCorporate Recruitment (position funded through FY 08)

0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2

9 WFMO Prog Spt MS-WMP NOAA Aw ards Ceremonies 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.110 WFMO Prog Spt MS-WMP Employee Assistance Program 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.311 WFMO Prog Spt MS-WMP James D. Martin Worklife Center Programs 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1



• IPL Compliance: What we heard from other Offices (Cont’d)

FY09 Integrated Priority Listing - CONSOLIDATION OF LINE OFFICE SUBMISSIONS - Program Support-Related Office

PriorityLine/Staff

OfficeGoal Program Capability (Description of Requirement) FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12

1 OCFO Prog Spt MS-FIN MS-FIN-PAY, Working Capital Fund - Increases 1.0 1.4 1.7 2.12 OCFO Prog Spt MS-FIN MS-FIN-MIS, End to End Resource Management System 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.5

3 OCFO Prog Spt MS-FINMS-FIN-ACT, Commerce Business System (Server Consolidation)

2.4 2.4 2.5 2.5

4 OCFO Prog Spt MS-FIN MS-FIN-ACT, CBS - Oracle License Renew als 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.05 OCFO Prog Spt MS-FIN MS-FIN-ACT, CBS - Develop & Replace 3.5 2.0 2.0 1.36 OCFO Prog Spt MS-FIN MS-FIN-ACT, CBS - New Accounting System 0.9 0.9 5.9 27.01 AGO Prog Spt MS-AQP Acquisition and Grant Services 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Total Program Support-Related NESDIS Priority Items ($ M) TBD TBD TBD TBD12 NESDIS Prog Spt Facilities Fairbanks temporary building solution TBD TBD TBD TBD

Total Program Support-Related NMFS Priority Items ($ M) 19.6 23.3 22.8 16.0

1 NMFS Ecosystems EOPLena Point Lab (Ted Stevens Marine research Institute)

2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0

1 NMFS Ecosystems EOP La Jolla Lease 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

1 NMFS EcosystemsEOP/PSP/Hab/

FMPPacif ic Islands Regional Off ice/Center Operations and Maintenance

5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0

2 NMFS Prog SptNMFS Program

OversightNMFS Facilities Operations and Maintenance - Sandy Hook, Santa Cruz, Kodiak deficit

1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5

2 NMFS EcosystemsNMFS Program

OversightSoutheast Regional Off ice Lease -signif icant increase.

0.8 0.9 0.9 1.0


OversightNortheast Regional Off ice Lease - new building 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7



• IPL Compliance: What we heard from other Offices (Cont’d)

FY09 Integrated Priority Listing - CONSOLIDATION OF LINE OFFICE SUBMISSIONS - Program Support-Related Office

PriorityLine/Staff

OfficeGoal Program Capability (Description of Requirement) FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13


OversightNew Facilities Requirements 7.9 11.6 11.0 4.1 0.7

Total Program Support-Related NWS Priority Items ($ M) 28.2 40.5 19.4 27.4 6.73 NWS Prog Spt Facilities Accelerate AK WSO/Housing Construction (Safety, Health)15.0 15.03 NWS Prog Spt Facilities NWS Facilities Maintenance Funding Shortfall 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.03 NWS Prog Spt Facilities Harden Facilities 7.1 12.2 6.0

14 NWS W&W FacilitiesWFO Construction (in lieu of lease: Tauton, Fort Worth, Tulsa, Little Rock, Topeka)

1.1 8.3 8.4 22.4 1.7

Total Program Support-Related OAR Priority Items ($ M) 1.2 1.1 1.1 0.7 2.51 OAR MS (PS) Facilities Rent Differential -- ARL move to NCWCP TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD2 OAR MS (PS) FAC OPS - Skaggs / Emerg. Pow er & Cooling 1.2 1.1 1.1 0.7 2.52 OAR MS (PS) FAC CON - Western Region Center Expansion TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD2 OAR MS (PS) FAC TBD - OAR Maintenance & Repair Backlog 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0

draft - predecisional 0 fy 09 mission/program support sub-goal program plan william f. broglie...

Documents

timeliness of services

securityguard services

noaa noaa enterprise

noaa mission objectives

public web services

electronic mail services

unfunded requirements

support of noaa mission