draft environmental impact assessment study report for...

Draft Environmental Impact Assessment study report for Installation of 1 x 900 MT capacity mounded LPG storage vessel at Pattikalan- Rampur Indane Bottling

Plant. Tehsil: Swar, District: Rampur, Uttar Pradesh by IOCL

6(b) Isolated storage & handling of hazardous chemicals, Category B

Prepared By:-

ABC TECHNO LABS INDIA PVT. LTD. AN ISO ISO 9001:2008, ISO14001:2004 & OHSAS 18001:2007 certified

Environmental Engineering and Consultancy Organization (NABL Accredited & MoEF Recognised Environment Laboratory)

QCI NABET Accredited (Certificate No. NABET / EIA / 1316 / RA001)

Registered Office: No.2, 2nd Street, Thangam Colony, Anna Nagar, West, Chennai 600040 Tamil Nadu, India 044-26161123.

Branch Office: A-355, Balaji Bhavan, Plot No. 42 A, Sector 11, CBD Belapur, Navi Mumbai 400614. Maharashtra, India Tel: 022 27580044.

www.abctechnolab.com [email protected]

http://www.abctechnolab.com/

mailto:[email protected]

Environmental Impact Assessment study report for Installation of 1 x 900 MT capacity mounded LPG storage vessel at Pattikalan- Rampur Indane Bottling Plant. Tehsil: Swar, District: Rampur, Uttar Pradesh by IOCL

ABC Techno Labs India Pvt. Ltd.

Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................................... 5

1. Background ............................................................................................................................................................. 5 Need of The Expansion of Pattikalan LPG Bottling Plant ....................................................................................................... 6 2. Project Description .................................................................................................................................................. 6

3 Description of Environment...................................................................................................................................... 8 COMPLIANCE TO STANDARD TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR ISOLATED STORAGE & HANDLING OF HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS (AS PER THRESHOLD PLANNING QUANTITY INDICATED IN COLUMN 3 OF SCHEDULE 2 & 3 OF MSIHC RULES 1989 AMENDED 2000) ..................... 18 CHAPTER 1 ................................................................................................................................................................................. 27 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................................................... 27

1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................................................... 27 1.2 Need of the Expansion of Pattikalan - Rampur LPG Bottling Plant ......................................................................... 28 1.3 Need of EIA ........................................................................................................................................................... 28 1.4 Terms of Reference (TOR): ................................................................................................................................... 28 1.5 Approach Methodology.......................................................................................................................................... 29 1.6 Environmental Settings.......................................................................................................................................... 30

1.6.1 Location Details of the Site .......................................................................................................................... 30 1.6.2 Accessibility to Plant Site ............................................................................................................................. 31

1.7 EIA Report Presentation ........................................................................................................................................ 35 Chapter 2: Description of the Project ........................................................................................................................................ 35 CHAPTER 2: ................................................................................................................................................................................ 37 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................................................................. 37

2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................... 37 2.2 Needs of Capacity Enhancement .......................................................................................................................... 37 2.3 Project Location .................................................................................................................................................... 37 2.4 Existing & Proposed LPG Storage Capacity .......................................................................................................... 40 2.5 Earthquake Resistant Measures for LPG Storage Vessel ...................................................................................... 40 2.6 Access to the LPG Plant ........................................................................................................................................ 40 2.7 LPG Storage & Filling Process Description ............................................................................................................ 41

2.7.1 Receipt of LPG ............................................................................................................................................ 42 2.7.2 Storage of LPG ............................................................................................................................................ 42 Facility Description ......................................................................................................................................................... 43 2.7.3 Filling of Cylinders ....................................................................................................................................... 43 2.7.4 Filled Cylinder Storage Shed ....................................................................................................................... 44 2.7.5 Checking of Weight and Leak Testing .......................................................................................................... 44 2.7.6 Air Removal from New And Repaired Cylinders and LPG Vapor Filling - Purging Unit ................................. 44 2.7.7 Evacuation of Overfilled Cylinders ............................................................................................................... 44 2.7.8 Storage of Filled Cylinders & Transportation ................................................................................................ 44

2.8 Dispatch ................................................................................................................................................................ 45 2.9 LPG Pumps, Compressor Shed and Air Drying Unit .............................................................................................. 45 2.10 Fire Fighting Facilities ....................................................................................................................................... 45 2.11 Tank Lorry Unloading Bay ................................................................................................................................ 46 2.12 Safe Distance and Inter-distances .................................................................................................................... 46 2.13 Land-use of LPG Bottling Plant ......................................................................................................................... 46 2.15 Power Requirement .......................................................................................................................................... 48 2.16 Truck Parking Area ........................................................................................................................................... 48 2.17 Gas Monitoring System .................................................................................................................................... 48 2.18 Plant Security System....................................................................................................................................... 48 2.19 Communication System .................................................................................................................................... 48 2.20 Process Parameters & Design Basis ................................................................................................................ 48 2.21 Safety Philosophy ............................................................................................................................................. 49

2.21.1 LPG Installations - Codes & Standards .................................................................................................. 49 2.21.2 Mounded Storage for LPG ...................................................................................................................... 49

2.22 Earthquake Resistant Measures for LPG Storage Vessel ................................................................................. 50 2.23 Geotechnical Investigation for Safe Bearing Capacity Mounded Storage Vessel .............................................. 50 2.24 Project Cost ...................................................................................................................................................... 51 2.25 Water Requirement and Waste Water Generation ............................................................................................ 51 ............................................................................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 51 2.26 Solid Wastes and Hazardous Wastes ............................................................................................................... 51

2.26.1 Solid Wastes ....................................................................................................................................................... 51 2.26.2 Hazardous Waste Generation ................................................................................................................. 52

2.27 Air Pollution Sources ........................................................................................................................................ 52 2.28 Noise Generation and its Management ............................................................................................................. 52

CHAPTER 3: ................................................................................................................................................................................ 53 DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENT .................................................................................................................................................. 53

3.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................... 53 3.2 Topography ........................................................................................................................................................... 53 3.2 Climate: ........................................................................................................................................................................ 55



Rainfall ........................................................................................................................................................................... 55 Temperature .................................................................................................................................................................. 55 Relative Humidity ........................................................................................................................................................... 55 Wind Direction ................................................................................................................................................................ 56

3.2 Geology & Geomorphology............................................................................................................................................ 56 3.4 Minerals ............................................................................................................................................................... 57 3.3 Natural Hazards and Disaster Risk ........................................................................................................................ 57 3.5 Hydrogeology ................................................................................................................................................................ 57 3.5 Water Resources And Water Quality ..................................................................................................................... 61

3.5.1 Water Resources ......................................................................................................................................... 61 3.5.2 Surface Water Resources ............................................................................................................................ 61 3.5.3 Ground Water Resources ...................................................................................................................................... 61 3.5.4 Ground and Surface Water Quality .............................................................................................................. 62 Water Sampling Locations ............................................................................................................................................. 62 A. Characteristics of Ground Water Samples ............................................................................................................... 63 B. Characteristics of Surface Water Samples ........................................................................................................ 67

3.6 Climatology and Meteorology ................................................................................................................................ 69 3.6.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 69 3.6.2 Climatology ........................................................................................................................................................... 69 3.6.3 Climatological Data ............................................................................................................................................... 69 3.6.4 Micro Meteorological Data for the Site ......................................................................................................... 70

3.7 Ambient Air Quality ................................................................................................................................................ 70 3.7.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 70 3.7.2 Methodology of Monitoring and Analysis ...................................................................................................... 71 3.7.3 Sampling and Analytical Techniques ........................................................................................................... 71 3.7.4 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Locations ..................................................................................................... 72 3.7.4 National Ambient Air Quality Standards ....................................................................................................... 73 3.7.5 Results of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring .................................................................................................... 73 3.7.4 Ambient Air Quality Standards ..................................................................................................................... 73 3.10.5 Results ................................................................................................................................................................ 75 3.10.6 Observations ...................................................................................................................................................... 85

3.8 Ambient Noise Levels ............................................................................................................................................ 85 3.8.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 85 3.8.2 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................ 85 3.8.3 Equivalent Sound Pressure Level (Leq) ....................................................................................................... 85

3.9 Land Use Pattern.............................................................................................................................................. 87 3.9.1 Land Use Pattern by Revenue Records ....................................................................................................... 87 3.9.2 Landuse Pattern within study area ....................................................................................................................... 87

3.10 Biological Environment ..................................................................................................................................... 88 3.10.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 88 3.10.2 Flora Found in the study area ................................................................................................................ 88 ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 91 3.10.3 Wildlife in the Study Area ....................................................................................................................... 91 3.10.5 Rare or Endangered Species .................................................................................................................. 92 3.10.6 Environmental Sensitive Area ................................................................................................................. 92

3.11 Socio-economic Environment ........................................................................................................................... 92 3.11.1: Baseline status .................................................................................................................................................. 94 3.11.2 Infrastructure Resources: ........................................................................................................................ 99 3.11.3: Economic Attributes:......................................................................................................................................... 100 3.11.4: Health Status ....................................................................................................................................... 103 3.11.5: Cultural and Aesthetic Attributes ...................................................................................................................... 103 3.11.6: Sampling Methodology ......................................................................................................................... 104 3.11.7: Data Collection Method .................................................................................................................................... 104 3.11.8: Field Survey and Observations ......................................................................................................................... 104 3.11.9: Interview Method .............................................................................................................................................. 104 3.11.10: Awareness and Opinion of People about the Project ...................................................................................... 105 3.11.11: Quality of Life: ................................................................................................................................................ 106

CHAPTER 4: .............................................................................................................................................................................. 108 ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION MEASURES ............................................................................................. 108

4.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................... 108 4.2 Physical Environment .......................................................................................................................................... 108

4.2.1 Soil ............................................................................................................................................................ 108 4.2.2 Water Quality ............................................................................................................................................. 109

During Operation Phase .................................................................................................................................................... 109 4.2.3 Climatology and Meteorology ..................................................................................................................... 110 4.2.4 Air Quality .................................................................................................................................................. 110 4.2.5 Noise ................................................................................................................................................................... 110

4.3 Demographic, Land Use And Socio-economic Environment ................................................................................ 113 4.3.1 Demographic ............................................................................................................................................. 113 4.3.2 Land Use ................................................................................................................................................... 113 4.3.4 Socio-economic ......................................................................................................................................... 114 4.3.4 Sustainable Development And Environmental Protection ........................................................................... 114

CHAPTER 5: .............................................................................................................................................................................. 115 ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................................................................. 115



5.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................... 115 5.2 Alternative Technology ........................................................................................................................................ 115 5.3 Alternative Site .................................................................................................................................................... 115 5.4 Alternatives For LPG Storage And Filling Facilities .............................................................................................. 115 5.5 Alternative For Risk Reduction For LPG .............................................................................................................. 116

CHAPTER 6: .............................................................................................................................................................................. 117 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PLAN ........................................................................................................................................ 117

6.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................... 117 6.2 Environmental Monitoring Schedules................................................................................................................... 117

6.2.1 Ambient Air Quality (AAQ) Monitoring ........................................................................................................ 118 6.2.2 Water Quality Monitoring ........................................................................................................................... 118 6.2.3 Noise Levels Monitoring............................................................................................................................. 118

6.3 Environmental Monitoring Plan ............................................................................................................................ 118 6.4 Health, Safety & Environmental Management Cell .............................................................................................. 121 6.5 Statutory Returns and Compliance Reports ......................................................................................................... 121

CHAPTER 7 ............................................................................................................................................................................... 122 RISK ASSESSMENT & DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN .................................................................................................................... 122

7.1 Risk Assessment and Disaster Management Plan ............................................................................................... 122 CHAPTER 8 ............................................................................................................................................................................... 123 PROJECT BENEFITS .................................................................................................................................................................... 123

8.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................... 123 8.2 Direct Benefits ..................................................................................................................................................... 123 8.3 Improvement in the Social Infrastructure ............................................................................................................. 123 8.4 Employment Potential ......................................................................................................................................... 123 8.5 Reduction of Emissions ....................................................................................................................................... 124 8.6 Other Tangible Benefits ....................................................................................................................................... 124

CHAPTER 9 ............................................................................................................................................................................... 125 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN ...................................................................................................................................... 125

9.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................... 125 9.2 Physical Environment .......................................................................................................................................... 125

9.2.1. Soil ............................................................................................................................................................ 125 9.2.2 Water Quality ............................................................................................................................................. 125 9.2.3 Meteorology ............................................................................................................................................... 126 9.2.4 Air Environment ......................................................................................................................................... 126 9.2.5 Solid Waste Management .......................................................................................................................... 127 9.2.6 Noise ......................................................................................................................................................... 127

9.3 Green Belt ........................................................................................................................................................... 128 9.3.1 Terrestrial Ecology ..................................................................................................................................... 128 9.3.2 Green Belt Development ............................................................................................................................ 128

9.4 Socio-economic Environment .............................................................................................................................. 128 9.5 Rain Water Harvesting ........................................................................................................................................ 128 9.6 Environmental Management Cell ......................................................................................................................... 128 9.7 Environmental Training........................................................................................................................................ 128 9.8 Reporting And Monitoring System ....................................................................................................................... 129 9.9 Budgets For Implementation of EMP And Monitoring Plan .................................................................................. 129 9.10 Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) ........................................................................................................... 130

CHAPTER 10: ............................................................................................................................................................................ 131 DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANTS .................................................................................................................................................. 131

10.1 Introduction..................................................................................................................................................... 131 10.2 The Consultant: ABC Techno Labs ................................................................................................................. 131 10.3 Services of ABC Techno Labs India Private Limited ....................................................................................... 132

10.3.1 Environmental Services .................................................................................................................................... 132 10.3.2 Turnkey Projects ............................................................................................................................................... 132 10.3.3 Other Services .................................................................................................................................................. 132 10.3.4 Laboratory Services .......................................................................................................................................... 132

10.4 Sectors Accredited by NABET (QCI) .............................................................................................................. 133 10.5 Study Team for EIA Study .............................................................................................................................. 133



EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1. Background

Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL), a Govt. of India Enterprise, is the highest ranked Indian public sector company in the prestigious Fortune 'Global 500' listing, ranked 96th position in 2016. Indian Oil Corporation Limited is an Indian state-owned oil and gas corporation with its headquarters in New Delhi, India. It is one of the seventh ‘Maharatna’ status companies of India. IOCL is one of the leading companies in Public Sector engaged in the oil refining and marketing of its products in the country. The Indian Oil Group of companies owns and operates 10 of India's 22 refineries with a combined refining capacity of 65.7 million metric tonnes per year. Oil marketing companies have projected an increase in demand of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in future due to increase in its domestic use. The demand is likely to increase substantially over the years to come. Even in the present scenario, it is very difficult to meet the market demand of Rampur and adjoining areas by Indian Oil Corporation Limited. As per directive of the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Government of India, different Oil companies are required to augment / construct new facilities to meet the growing demand.

M/s. Indian Oil Corporation Limited, working under the aegis of Ministry of Petroleum is having an establishment for storage and bottling of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) at Rampur LPG bottling Plant. The existing LPG Plant is under operation at Tehsil: Swar, District: Rampur, Uttar Pradesh with Consent to Operate vide letter no (Water Consent - 417 W / I-8 / Rampur, Air Consent- 417A / I-8 / Rampur) from UPPCB. Now, IOCL intends to enhance storage capacity of LPG (Additional storage vessel) IOCL proposes for installation of 1 x 900 MT capacity mounded LPG storage vessel to enhance the storage capacity of Pattikalan Rampur LPG bottling Plant by proposed additional mounded storage vessel. The Plant was established in 2001. The existing storage capacity of LPG is 1,850 MT (1x 1400 MT , 3 x 150 MT) at existing plant and after erection of the proposed one mounded storage vessel (1 x 900 MT ) storage capacity will be 2,750 MT LPG storage. The existing LPG bottling plant is conforming to OISD 144 and OISD standards and guidelines.

M/s ABC Techno Labs India Private Limited (ABC Techno Labs), NABET Accredited Environmental Consultant Organisation, has been engaged by M/s Indian Oil Corporation (IOCL) to carry out Environmental Impact Assessment studies for the proposed expansion of LPG bottling plant.



Need of The Expansion of Pattikalan LPG Bottling Plant

The current storage capacity of Bulk LPG is 1,850 MT and demand for LPG is ever growing with market and addition of new consumers through Government schemes to reduce pollution due to use of fire wood and safe guard the environment. Hence, IOCL has proposed to increase the storage capacity of LPG at its existing LPG bottling plant at Pattikalan-Rampur with addition of 1 no. x 900MT mounded storage vessel.

2. Project Description

The Plant was established in 2001. The existing storage capacity of LPG is 1,850 MT (1x 1400 MT , 3 x 150 MT) at existing plant and after erection of the proposed one mounded storage vessel (1 x 900 MT ), the total storage capacity will become 2,750 MT.

Receipt of LPG: The LPG is received through bulk tank lorries from “(LPG BP- Madanpur Khadar, LPG BP- Karnal, LPG BP – Jaipur, LPG BP –Mathura, LPG BP –Loni, OMC(GAIL) LPG Hosp. Locn- PATA, Jamnagar Terminal, IOCL-Jamnagar Essar, LPG BP –Dumad, Kandla LPG Import Terminal, LPG Import Terminal Porbander, LPG Import Terminal Pipavav)”. Existing bulk LPG unloading bays will be used for receipt of LPG like current practice. Storage of LPG:

Sr.

No.

Product Total

Capacity

Status

1. Horton Sphere 1,400 MT Existing

2. LPG Bullets 3 x 150 MT Existing

3. LPG mounded Vessel 1 x 900 MT Proposed

Total capacity after expansion 2,750 MT

Dispatch: Filled cylinders are dispatched to distributors) to cater growing demand in

Rampur, Moradabad, Sambhal Bareilly, Badaun, Amroha, Pilibhit, Bijnour in

Uttarpradesh and Pauri Garhwal, Nainital, Haridwar, Udham Singh Nagar in

Uttarakhand.

Land Requirement

The IOCL Plant is located on 33.25 Acres area of land and is sufficient for its existing

and proposed enhancement. The land use of the proposed LPG plant is given below:

Land-use of LPG Bottling Plant



Sr. No. Particulars Area (m2) Area in

Acres

1. Total plot area 1,34,558 33.25

Power Requirement

The maximum contract demand for the industry is about 350 KW which is to be

obtained from Uttarakhand Power Corporation Ltd (UPCL). DG Sets with 2 x 500 KVA,

DG SET 1 x 250 KVA, DG SET 1 x 100 KVA will be operated during power failure.

Water Requirement

Total water requirement at the existing LPG bottling plant is 3 KLD, which meet

through the borewell onsite. Approx 1 KLD will be used for gardening 1.4 KLD waste

water is generated, which is treated in septic tank followed by soak pit at the existing

LPG plant.

Fire Fighting Facility at LPG Bottling plant

The following fire fighting facilities will be provided at the proposed LPG bottling

plant:

Fire Fighting Facilities at the Plant

Fire Extinguisher (10kg) DCP Type : 100 Nos.


Fire Extinguisher (4.5 kg) CO2 Type : 12 Nos.


Sand Bucket (9 Liter’s) : 20 Nos.

Water Storage Capacity : 4,150 KL X 2

nos.

Deluge Valves (Sprinklers) : 17 Nos.

Main Fire Pump (410 kL/hr) : 7 Nos.

Jockey Pump (30 KL/hr) : 2 Nos.

Deluge Valve with heat Detector : 17 Nos.

Water Monitors : 34 Nos.

Fire Hydrant : 22Nos.

Hose Box : 23Nos.

Fire Hose : 58Nos.

Jet Nozzle : 27 Nos.

Fog Nozzle : 2 Nos

Universal Nozzle : 2 Nos

Water Curtain Nozzle : 2 Nos.

Pressurised fire hydrant system : Available

Fire Engine : 410 kl/hr X 7

nos.



Other necessary facilities to support fire fighting during emergency are as given

below:

Internal communication : page phone, VHF hand sets, public address system

External communication : landline and mobile

Warning system for fire: 1 no. electrical siren with 3 km range and 7 hand siren with

range 1 km.

3 Description of Environment

The reconnaissance survey of the area around the Pattikalan, Rampur LPG Bottling

plant was carried out on 19th and 22nd of November 2016 and the field studies were

carried out for one season (30th November, 2016 to 28th February, 2017) during

post monsoon season for the EIA studies to collect baseline primary and secondary

data for the present environmental scenario in the study area.

Topographic Features

The project location lies entirely in the Gangetic plain. The topography of Rampur

district is mainly a plain landmass. The proposed site is flat without any undulation

with average elevation of 206 m above msl. There is no reserve forest located in the

study area.

.

Soil

Fine textured, Organic matter rich soil occur in Tarai tract. Loamy soil developed in

uplands. Silty soil occur in younger alluvial plains.

Hydrogeology

District Rampur lies over alluvial deposits of the quaternary period brought by river

systems of Ganga and Ram Ganga. These comprise sand, silt and clays in various

proportions. The depth to water level in year during pre-monsoon period varies from

4.83 to 8.68 mbgl. Whereas, in post-monsoon period it varies from 2.02 to 7.10

mbgl. The fluctuation in water level between pre & post monsoon period is from 0.0

to 3.23 m.



Water Quality

Ground water quality in the study area, generally meets the permissible limits and

used for drinking in the absence of better quality potable water availability.

Micro-meteorology

May is the hottest month of the year with mean daily maximum temperature at about

46°C and mean daily minimum temperature about 40°C. With the advance of the

southwest monsoon the day temperature drops appreciably but the night continue to be

warm. January is the coldest month with the mean daily maximum temperature at 21°C

and mean daily minimum temperature about 8°C. The mean monthly maximum

temperature is 29.4°C and mean monthly minimum temperature is 12°C. The mean

monthly morning relative humidity is 69% and the mean monthly evening relative

humidity 51%. The winds flows most frequently from west (W), followed by the wind from

the east (E) and northwest (NW). The frequency of winds from west (W), east (E) and

northwest (NW) are 28%, 12% and 8% respectively, however the winds are calms on 37 %

during the study period. The winds are rarely flow from south southeast (SSE), south

southwest (SSW) directions. Wind are generally light, the mean wind velocity is 5-1 kph.

The potential evapo-transpiration rate is 1402.8 mm.

Ambient Air Quality

National Air Quality Standards in the study area are met for all monitored

parameters for the AAQM locations.

Noise

Measured Leq noise levels are below the prescribed limit stipulated for commercial

area at IOCL Pattikalan -Rampur LPG Plant site, However, some time noise levels

exceed the limit of the because occasional traffic movement.

Places of Historical Importance

There is no historical or archaeological monument in the study area.



Forest Cover

There is no reserved or protected forest-land involved in the project.

4 Anticipated Environmental Impacts & Mitigation Measures

Soil

During the construction of the additional LPG mounded storage vessel, there will be

a small amount of construction wastes, such as, metal cutting, oil, grease and debris,

which may contaminate soil at the site of construction. However, the extent of

contamination will not be significant. These wastes will not normally contaminate

ground water. Their impact on soil and surface water will be restricted to the

construction period in small area around the construction site during heavy rainfall

only.

During operation phase of existing LPG plant and proposed additional LPG mounded

storage vessel for storage of LPG, no process waste will be generated. About 22.4 kg

solid wastes will also be generated from office and canteen. Used oil will be

generated at the time of maintenance of DG sets. For collection, management and

disposal of solid and hazardous wastes from the IOCL LPG plant, necessary mitigation

measures will be taken same as for existing LPG Plant.

Water Quality

The construction phase may result in minor soil erosion from the LPG plant site, as it

will clear of ground flora and excavation for construction of 1 x 900 MT capacity LPG

mounded storage vessel. The runoff from the construction site during rainfall may

cause some increase in the quantity of suspended solids and turbidity in the runoff in

natural drain. However, this impact will be of temporary nature and may not last as

soon as excavated soil established and construction debris are disposed of properly.

No process effluents will be generated during operation of existing and after

expansion LPG Plant. During operation of the existing and after expansion of LPG

plant, 1.40 KLD domestic waste water will be generated every day. It will be

treated in oil grease trap and passed to septic tanks and discharged into soak pit.

Municipal wastes (paper plastic, food wastes, etc) generated from LPG plant will

be collected and segregated. Recyclable wastes like paper and plastic wastes will

be sent for recycling, while biodegradable wastes like food and vegetable wastes

will be disposed in compost pit. Non- biodegradable and non- recyclable wastes

will be sent to common landfill site.



Used oil (540 litres) is generated from the maintenance of DG sets will be handed

over to UPPCB/MoEF&CC authorized used oil recyclers.

Ambient Air Quality

A certain amount of particulate matter will be generated during the construction

phase of additional 1 x 900 MT capacity LPG mounded storage vessel at LPG plant.

However, the suspended particulate matter in ambient air as a result of construction

activities may be relatively coarse and will be settled within a short distance.

Therefore, the impact will be restricted within the close vicinity of the construction

activity. Further, for construction of additional 1 x 900 MT capacity LPG mounded

storage vessel at LPG plant, construction activities will be taken place for 12 months

only, therefore, impacts will be observed for short period and reversible in nature.

During operation of existing LPG plant after expansion, there will not be any process

emission sources. No emissions will be generated during the bottling operations as

the entire bottling process is carried out closed circuit through piping from storage

area to filling shed.

Very small quality of fugitive emissions of hydrocarbon may result from unloading

hose, faulty bottling, leaking cylinders and minor leaks. Gas detectors have been

placed at the LPG plant at strategic locations to detect concentration of

hydrocarbon in the premises. DG sets installed at the LPG Bottling plant are

operated occasionally in case of power failure and these are not regular source of

gaseous emissions.

LPG Lorrie and trucks have pollution under control (PUC) certificates. Regular

maintenance of LPG Lorrie and trucks is ensured.

Noise

During the construction phase, cold cutting of metal sheets, bending, hammering,

erection of equipment, vehicle movement, DG sets may be major sources of noise

generation during construction of proposed 1 x 900 MT capacity additional LPG

mounded storage vessel at Pattikalan LPG bottling plant. Relatively high noise levels

will be generated during construction phase.

No regular noise generation is expected due to the operation of LPG bottling plant

after proposed additional LPG mounded storage vessel. DG sets are to be operated

only during grid power failure.



Equipment specification and installation of acoustic enclosure with DG sets ensure

low level of noise generation. All the LPG Lorries and trucks are essentially fitted with

silencers to control noise generation.

Peripheral green belt on 44,405 sq.m (33 %) is available around the LPG plant, which

works as noise barrier.

Terrestrial Ecology

The site of construction of 1 x 900 MT capacity mounded vessel is free from trees

and shrubs, therefore, during construction phase, no vegetation needs to be will be

cleared. Therefore, no impact is anticipated on terrestrial ecology of the area.

At the existing LPG Plant, peripheral green belt has been developed on 44,405 sq.m

area, which is 33 % of the total area of the LPG plant. During operation phase of LPG

plant there will be no impact on green belt of the depot and ecology of the study

area is anticipated. Growth of plantation and development of green belt at the LPG

plant is likely to improve the flora and fauna at the site.



Socio-economic Impacts

During construction phase, 100 workers will be deployed, mostly from local area.

The construction of proposed mounded vessel within LPG plant will not displace any

person.

Operation of the LPG bottling plant will not require large work force and existing 20

persons will be sufficient after expansion of bottling plant. Therefore, large scale

immigration will not take place and the impact on demography of the area will be

insignificant.

5 Alternative Analysis

IOCL has planned to install 1 no. of mounded vessel of 900 MT capacity at the

existing LPG plant.

Alternative for Risk Reduction for LPG

Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) handling has many challenges due to its inherent

dangerous properties. Some of the major fires/explosions have underlined the need

for total in depth review of design, procedures maintenance fire fighting and safety

aspects in LPG handling.

The cover of the mound protects the bullets from fire engulfment, radiation from a

fire in close proximity and acts of sabotage or vandalism. The area of land required

to locate mounded system is minimal compared to conventional storage. Mounded

vessel are semi-conventional pressure vessel, covered by a layer of sand and stone

aggregates. The cover of the mound protects the vessel from fire engulfment,

radiation from a fire in close proximity and acts of sabotage or vandalism.

6 Environmental Monitoring Plan

To check the efficacy of the adopted mitigation measures and environmental

Management plan, post project monitoring is carried out for various environmental

parameters. In case, the monitored results of environmental parameter are found to

exceed the allowable/stipulated values, the Environmental Management Cell

suggests remedial actions and gets these suggestions implemented through the

concerned personnel.

Ambient Air Quality (AAQ) Monitoring



Ambient air quality parameters suggested during operation phase of the proposed

new storage tanks within existing Pattikalan LPG plant are Particulate Matters

(PM2.5), Particulate Matter (PM10), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Sulphur Dioxide (SO2),

Carbon Monoxide (CO), HC and VOC. These are to be monitored at designated

locations starting from the commencement of construction activities. Data should be

generated 24 hourly during operation phase at identified locations in accordance to

the National Ambient Air Quantity Standards.

Water Quality Monitoring

The monitoring of the ground water quality will be carried out at one location in

accordance to Indian Standard Drinking Water Specification-IS 10500:2012 for

relevant parameters as directed by Uttar Pradesh Pollution Control Board (UPPCB).

Noise Levels Monitoring

The measurement of noise levels would be carried out at suggested locations in

accordance to the Ambient Noise Standards formulated by Ministry of Environment,

Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC). Noise levels would be monitored on twenty-

four hourly basis.

7 Risk Assessment and Disaster Management Plan

Hazard identification, HAZOP and risk assessment for LPG plant including proposed 1

x 900 MT capacity mounded vessel have been carried and risk mitigation measures

have been spelled to enhance safety at the Pattikalan

8 Project Benefits

The demand for LPG is ever growing with market and addition of new consumers

through Government schemes to reduce pollution due to use of fire wood and safe

guard the environment. IOCL has proposed to increase the storage capacity of LPG at

their existing Pattikalan LPG bottling plant with addition of 1 x 900 MT mounded

storage vessel, reduce the gap in demand and supply of LPG cylinders especially for

household purpose.

Direct Benefits

The proposed installation of 1 x 900 MT capacity mounded vessel, at existing LPG

bottling plant, will yield following benefits that Provide continuity of LPG gas cylinder

supply to the consumers through distributors. Availability of LPG will discourage

deforestation and reduce the use of fire wood & fossil fuels. Improve the quality of

life of women engaged in household activities specially in cooking.



Improvement in The Social Infrastructure

The expansion of storage capacity of IOCL Pattikalan LPG bottling Plant will create

opportunities for direct and indirect employment in the area. The LPG bottling plant

will initiate local economic growth and thereby the potential to enhance quality of

life of the local communities. Local population may get benefited due to availability

of clean fuel after proposed installation of 1 x 900 MT capacity mounded vessel for

LPG storage at existing LPG plant.

Employment Potential

About 100 work force of different categories on an average basis are engaged during

construction phase of mounded vessel. During operational phase, about 20 people

will get direct and many more indirect employment opportunity. Local people will

get employment opportunity for security, house-keeping, maintenance, etc at the

plant and indirectly at Pattikalan LPG plant.

Other Benefits

The proposed installation of one mounded vessel at Pattikalan LPG plant shall create

tangible benefits as described below:

No private land acquisition is required for installation the mounded vessel at

Pattikalan LPG plant. The socio-economic impacts linked to the acquisition of

land and structures will not appear in the project.

During operation phase of installation of mounded vessel at LPG plant, no

significant impacts on environment are anticipated.

The proposed installation will generate direct and indirect employment

opportunities mainly during the operation phase. Local semi-skilled and unskilled

labourers will get direct employment in operation phase. This is a moderate

positive impact of the proposed project.

The installation will provide cleaner fuel to more people, which will create

healthy environmental conditions in the region.

9 Environment Management Plan

Environment Management Plan (EMP) for construction and operation phase is

required to ensure that mitigation of adverse impacts and strengthening of positive

impact resulting from the existing and proposed installation of 1 x 900 MT capacity

mounded LPG storage vessel.



Environmental protection and improvement measures must be taken at design stage

itself so as to minimize impacts during construction & operation phase of augmented

facilities. The impacts during the construction phase on the environment would be

basically of transient nature and are expected to reduce gradually on completion of

the construction activities.

Environmental Management Cell

Existing Pattikalan LPG plant of IOCL have full-fledge Safety and Environmental

Protection (S&EP) cell at corporate level to take care of any environmental issue at

its LPG plant. It is suggested that IOCL should designate one of its official for

implementation of EMP during construction of proposed installation of mounded

vessel. This official will be responsible for day-to-day environmental affairs including

implementing monitoring programme.

Environmental Training

To achieve the objective of pollution control, it is essential not only to provide best

pollution control system but also to provide trained manpower resources to operate

the same.

Reporting And Monitoring System

The reporting system will operate linearly with the person who is at the lowest level

of the implementation system to the project management and shall report to

Territorial Manager of Pattikaalan LPG Plant of IOCL.

For the proposed expansion of the LPG Plant of IOCL Pattikalan-Rampur by

installation of 1 x 900 MT capacity mounded LPG storage vessel, all reporting to the

Territorial Manager of IOCL will be on weekly basis. The IOCL’s Environmental

Management Cell will be responsible for preparing targets for each of the identified

mitigation measures.

Photographic records will also be established to provide useful environmental

monitoring tools. A full record will be kept as part of normal contract monitoring.

Budgets For Implementation of EMP And Monitoring Plan



The budget for implementation of mitigation measures and environmental

management plan to mitigate the potential adverse environmental impacts during

operation phase has been estimated as capacity cost Rs 48 Lakhs and recurring

expenditure as Rs 16 Lakhs.

Corporate Social Responsibility

Indian Oil Corporation Limited is Public Sector Company. Therefore Corporate Social

Responsibility program are undertaken as per Government of India guidelines.



COMPLIANCE TO STANDARD TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR ISOLATED STORAGE & HANDLING OF HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS (AS PER THRESHOLD PLANNING QUANTITY INDICATED IN COLUMN 3 OF SCHEDULE 2 & 3 OF MSIHC RULES

1989 AMENDED 2000)

S.No TOR Compliance

A STANDARD TERMS OF REFERENCE

1. Executive Summary Executive summary is attached with the EIA report

2. Introduction

(i) Details of the EIA Consultant including NABET accreditation

Refer Chapter 10 of the EIA report.

(ii) Information about the project proponent Refer Section 1.1 in Chapter 1 of the EIA report

(iii) Importance and benefits of the project Refer Section 1.3 in Chapter 1 and Chapter 8 of the EIA report


(i) Cost of project and time of completion The estimated project cost is 11 Crores (section 2.24, Chapter 2). IOCL will start the construction after obtaining the clearance.

(ii) Products with capacities for the proposed project.

Refer Section 2.7.2 , table 2.4 in Chapter 2 of the EIA report

(iii) If expansion project, details of existing products with capacities and whether adequate land is available for expansion, reference of earlier EC if any.

This is Expansion Project. The IOCL Pattikalan Plant was established in year 2001. The IOCL plant regularly complies the conditions laid by Uttar Pradesh Pollution Control Board ( UPPCB)

(iv) List of raw materials required and their source along with mode of transportation.

Its a storage unit for LPG. It receives, stores & dispatches LPG. Refer Section 2.7.1 in Chapter 2 of the EIA report The LPG is received through bulk tank lorries from IOCL LPG plants

Filled cylinders are dispatched to distributors. Presently the cylinders are sent through Packed Lorries to markets of Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand.

(v) Other chemicals and materials required with quantities and storage capacities

No other chemicals and materials will be required as the proposed plant is storage and bottling plant.

(vi) Details of Emission, effluents, hazardous waste generation and their management.

Refer Sections 2.25, 2.26.1, 2.26.2, 2.27 in Chapter 2 of the EIA report

(vii) Requirement of water, power, with source of supply, status of approval, water balance diagram, man-power requirement (regular and contract)

Refer Sections , 2.25 in Chapter 2 of the EIA report.

(viii) Process description along with major equipments and machineries, process flow sheet (quantative) from raw material to products to be provided

Refer Chapter 2 of EIA Report.

(ix) Hazard identification and details of proposed safety systems.

Refer Risk Assessment Report attached as Annexure IV and Annexure V

(x) Expansion/modernization proposals:

(a) Copy of all the Environmental Clearance(s) including Amendments thereto obtained for the project from MOEF/SEIAA shall be attached as an

Not applicable



Annexure. A certified copy of the latest Monitoring Report of the Regional Office of the Ministry of Environment and Forests as per circular dated 30th May, 2012 on the status of compliance of conditions stipulated in all the existing environmental clearances including Amendments shall be provided. In addition, status of compliance of Consent to Operate for the ongoing existing operation of the project from SPCB shall be attached with the EIA-EMP report.

(b) In case the existing project has not obtained environmental clearance, reasons for not taking EC under the provisions of the EIA Notification 1994 and/or EIA Notification 2006 shall be provided. Copies of Consent to Establish/No Objection Certificate and Consent to Operate (in case of units operating prior to EIA Notification 2006, CTE and CTO of FY 2005-2006) obtained from the SPCB shall be submitted. Further, compliance report to the conditions of consents from the SPCB shall be submitted.

Plant was established before EIA Notification 2006. Copies of Consent to Establish and Consent to Operate attached as Annexure III

4. Site Details

(i) Location of the project site covering village, Taluka/Tehsil, District and State, Justification for selecting the site, whether other sites were considered.

Refer section 2.2 in Chapter 2 of EIA Report.

(ii) A toposheet of the study area of radius of 10km and site location on 1:50,000/1:25,000 scale on an A3/A2 sheet. (including all eco-sensitive areas and environmentally sensitive places)

Refer Fig.no. 1.2 in Chapter 1 of EIA Report.

(iii) Details w.r.t. option analysis for selection of site

Refer section 5.3 in Chapter 5 of EIA Report.

(iv) Co-ordinates (lat-long) of all four corners of the site.

The latitude -longitude of the Pattikalan LPG Bottling Plant is as follows:

Latitude : 29°9‘ 18. 10"N Longitude: : 79°2‘ 41. 27"E

(v) Google map-Earth downloaded of the project site.

Refer Fig. no. 2.1 in Chapter 2 of EIA Report.

(vi) Layout maps indicating existing unit as well as proposed unit indicating storage area, plant area, greenbelt area, utilities etc. If located within an Industrial area/Estate/Complex, layout of Industrial Area indicating location of unit within the Industrial area/Estate.

Refer Fig. no. 2.2 in Chapter 2 of EIA Report.

(vii) Photographs of the proposed and existing (if applicable) plant site. If existing, show photographs of plantation/greenbelt, in particular.

Refer Chapter 2. The total green belt area is 44,405 Sq.m

(viii) Landuse break-up of total land of the project site (identified and acquired), government/private - agricultural, forest, wasteland, water bodies, settlements, etc shall be included. (not required for industrial area)

It is an industrial area located in UPSIDC. Land use pattern: Refer Chapter 3

(ix) A list of major industries with name and type within study area (10km radius) shall be incorporated. Land use details of the study area

Refer Chapter 3 (Table 3.1)



1. Geological features and Geo-hydrological status of the study area shall be included.

Geological features and Geo-hydrological status of the study area are given in Chapter 3.

2. Details of Drainage of the project upto 5km radius of study area. If the site is within 1 km radius of any major river, peak and lean season river discharge as well as flood occurrence frequency based on peak rainfall data of the past 30 years. Details of Flood Level of the project site and maximum Flood Level of the river shall also be provided. (mega green field projects)

Most of the natural drainage carries runoff during monsoon months. No other water bodies exist in the project study area. There has been no floods in the project location

3. Status of acquisition of land. If acquisition is not complete, stage of the acquisition process and expected time of complete possession of the land.

The land belongs to IOCL Pattikalan. The land lies in UPSIDC. The mounded storage vessel will be constructed on the land in the existing premises of the plant.

4. R&R details in respect of land in line with state Government policy

Not applicable

5. Forest and wildlife related issues (if applicable):

(i) Permission and approval for the use of forest land (forestry clearance), if any, and recommendations of the State Forest Department. (if applicable)

Not applicable

(ii) Landuse map based on High resolution satellite imagery (GPS) of the proposed site delineating the forestland (in case of projects involving forest land more than 40 ha)

Refer fig.no.3.14 in chapter 3 of EIA report.

(iii) Status of Application submitted for obtaining the stage I forestry clearance along with latest status shall be submitted.

The plant is located in UPSIDC Area. (Refer Annexure-II)

(iv) The projects to be located within 10 km of the National Parks, Sanctuaries, Biosphere Reserves, Migratory Corridors of Wild Animals, the project proponent shall submit the map duly authenticated by Chief Wildlife Warden showing these features vis-à-vis the project location and the recommendations or comments of the Chief Wildlife Warden-thereon.

No National Parks, Sanctuaries, Biosphere Reserves, Migratory Corridors of Wild Animals are within 10 km radius of the project site.

(v) Wildlife Conservation Plan duly authenticated by the Chief Wildlife Warden of the State Government for conservation of Schedule I fauna, if any exists in the study area.

No schedule I fauna exists in surrounding area of the project site

(vi) Copy of application submitted for clearance under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, to the Standing Committee of the National Board for Wildlife.

Not applicable

6. Environmental Status

(i) Determination of atmospheric inversion level at the project site and site-specific micrometeorological data using temperature, relative humidity, hourly wind speed and direction and rainfall.

Details of atmospheric inversion level at the project site and site-specific micrometeorological data using temperature, relative humidity, hourly wind speed and direction and rainfall is given in Chapter 3

(ii) AAQ data (except monsoon) at 8 locations for PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOX, CO and other parameters relevant to the project shall be collected. The monitoring stations shall be based CPCB guidelines and take into account the pre-dominant wind direction, population zone and sensitive receptors including reserved forests.

AAQ data (except monsoon) at 8 locations for PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOX, CO and other parameters were monitored according to the CPCB Guidelines. Details are given in Chapter 3 of the EIA report.



(iii) Raw data of all AAQ measurement for 12 weeks of all stations as per frequency given in the NAQQM Notification of Nov. 2009 along with - min., max., average and 98% values for each of the AAQ parameters from data of all AAQ stations should be provided as an annexure to the EIA Report.

AAQ data is given in section 3.7 in Chapter 3 of the EIA report.

(iv) Surface water quality of nearby River (100m upstream and downstream of discharge point) and other surface drains at eight locations as per CPCB/MoEF&CC guidelines.

Surface water quality details are given in section 3.5 in Chapter 3 of EIA report.

(v) Whether the site falls near to polluted stretch of river identified by the CPCB/MoEF&CC, if yes give details.

Not applicable

(vi) Ground water monitoring at minimum at 8 locations shall be included.

Ground water monitoring details are given in section 3.5 in Chapter 3 of EIA report

(vii) Noise levels monitoring at 8 locations within the study area.

For Noise levels monitoring details refer section 3.8 in Chapter 3 of the EIA report

(viii) Soil Characteristic as per CPCB guidelines. Refer section 3.4 in Chapter 3 of the EIA report

(ix) Traffic study of the area, type of vehicles, frequency of vehicles for transportation of materials, additional traffic due to proposed project, parking arrangement etc.

Refer section 2.6,2.7.8 in Chapter 2 of the EIA report

(x) Detailed description of flora and fauna (terrestrial and aquatic) existing in the study area shall be given with special reference to rare, endemic and endangered species. If Schedule I fauna are found within the study area, a Wildlife Conservation Plan shall be prepared and furnished.

Refer section 3.10.2 & 3.10.3 in chapter 3 of EIA report.

(xi) Socio-economic status of the study area. Details of Socio-economic status is given in section 3.11 in chapter 3 of EIA report

7. Impact and Environment Management Plan

(i) Assessment of ground level concentration of pollutants from the stack emission based on site-specific meteorological features. In case the project is located on a hilly terrain, the AQIP Modelling shall be done using inputs of the specific terrain characteristics for determining the potential impacts of the project on the AAQ. Cumulative impact of all sources of emissions (including transportation) on the AAQ of the area shall be assessed. Details of the model used and the input data used for modelling shall also be provided. The air quality contours shall be plotted on a location map showing the location of project site, habitation nearby, sensitive receptors, if any.

Refer section 3.7.4 in Chapter no.3 of EIA report.

(ii) Water Quality modelling - in case of discharge in water body

Not applicable as there will not be any discharge into water body.

(iii) Impact of the transport of the raw materials and end products on the surrounding environment shall be assessed and provided. In this regard, options for transport of raw materials and finished products and wastes (large quantities) by rail or rail-cum road transport or convey-or-cum rail transport shall be examined.

LPG will be transported through bullet trucks through roadways to the proposed bottling plant. Impact of bullet trucks movement has been predicted and given in the Chapter 2

(iv) A note on treatment of wastewater from different plant operations, extent recycled and

No process effluents will be generated during operation of existing and after expansion LPG Plant. During



reused for different purposes shall be included. Complete scheme of effluent treatment. Characteristics of untreated and treated effluent to meet the prescribed standards of discharge under E(P) Rules.

operation of the existing and after expansion of LPG plant, 1.4 KLD sewage will be generated will be treated in properly designed septic tanks and discharged into soak pit.

(v) Details of stack emission and action plan for control of emissions to meet standards.

The DG Set Stack height has been provided as per CPCB guidelines

(vi) Measures for fugitive emission control There will not be fugitive emissions from plant as it is storage and LPG bottling plant.

(vii) Details of hazardous waste generation and their storage, utilization and management. Copies of MOU regarding utilization of solid and hazardous waste in cement plant shall also be included. EMP shall include the concept of waste-minimization, recycle/reuse/recover techniques, Energy conservation, and natural resource conservation.

The hazardous wastes generated at the LPG pant is about 400 litres per annum spent oil from DG set which is stored in MS drums and sent to authorized recyclers

(viii) Proper utilization of fly ash shall be ensured as per Fly Ash Notification, 2009. A detailed plan of action shall be provided.

Not applicable

(ix) Action plan for the green belt development plan in 33 % area i.e. land with not less than 1,500 trees per ha. Giving details of species, width of plantation, planning schedule etc. Shall be included. The green belt shall be around the project boundary and a scheme for greening of the roads used for the project shall also be incorporated.

Green belt area of 44,405 Sq.m. will be developed. Details of trees are given in section 9.3 in chapter 9 of EIA report

Action plan for rainwater harvesting measures at plant site shall be submitted to harvest rainwater from the roof tops and storm water drains to recharge the ground water and also to use for the various activities at the project site to conserve fresh water and reduce the water requirement from other sources.

Rainwater harvesting will be provided in non-contaminated areas at the plant

(x) Total capital cost and recurring cost/annum for environmental pollution control measures shall be included.

Refer section 9.9 in chapter 9 of EIA report

(xi) Action plan for post-project environmental monitoring shall be submitted.

Action plan for post-project environmental monitoring is given in Chapter 6 of EIA report

(xii) Onsite and Offsite Disaster (natural and Man-made) Preparedness and Emergency Management Plan including Risk Assessment and damage control. Disaster management plan should be linked with District Disaster Management Plan.

Details of Onsite and Offsite Disaster (natural and Man-made) Preparedness and Emergency Management Plan is attached with EIA report as Annexure IV and V.

8. Occupational health

(i) Plan and fund allocation to ensure the occupational health & safety of all contract and casual workers

Refer chapter 9 in the EIA report

(ii) Details of exposure specific health status evaluation of worker. If the workers' health is being Evaluated by pre designed format, chest x rays, Audiometry, Spirometry, Vision testing (Far & Near vision, colour vision and any other ocular defect) ECG, during pre placement and periodical examinations give the details of the same. Details regarding last month analyzed data of above mentioned parameters as per age, sex, duration of

Health check-up of working persons, for identifying occupational health hazards will be conducted during the operation phase.



exposure and department wise.

(iii) Details of existing Occupational & Safety Hazards. What are the exposure levels of hazards and whether they are within Permissible Exposure level (PEL). If these are not within PEL, what measures the company has adopted to keep them within PEL so that health of the workers can be preserved,

There are presently there is no occupational safety hazards at the plant. Hydrocarbon leakage/detectors are placed at strategic locations. The HAZID/HAZOP and ERDMP plans are updated periodically

(iv) Annual report of health status of workers with special reference to Occupational Health and Safety.

Health check-ups of working personnel are organized by IOCL

9. Corporate Environment Policy

(i) Does the company have a well laid down Environment Policy approved by its Board of Directors? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA report.

Refer chapter 9 of EIA report

(ii) Does the Environment Policy prescribe for standard operating process / procedures to bring into focus any infringement / deviation / violation of the environmental or forest norms / conditions? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA.


(iii) What is the hierarchical system or Administrative order of the company to deal with the environmental issues and for ensuring compliance with the environmental clearance conditions? Details of this system may be given


(iv) Does the company have system of reporting of non compliances / violations of environmental norms to the Board of Directors of the company and / or shareholders or stakeholders at large? This reporting mechanism shall be detailed in the EIA report

For details of the reporting and monitoring system refer chapter 9

10. Details regarding infrastructure facilities such as sanitation, fuel, restroom etc. to be provided to the labour force during construction as well as to the casual workers including truck drivers during operation phase

Adequate facilities for sanitation and restroom rooms are available in the existing plant.

11. Enterprise Social Commitment (ESC)

Adequate funds (at least 2.5 % of the project cost) shall be earmarked towards the Enterprise Social Commitment based on Public Hearing issues and item-wise details along with time bound action plan shall be included. Socio-economic development activities need to be elaborated upon.

Details are given in section 9.10 in chapter 9 of the EIA report

12. Any litigation pending against the project and/or any direction/order passed by any Court of Law against the project, if so, details thereof shall also be included. Has the unit received any notice under the Section 5 of Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 or relevant Sections of Air and Water Acts? If so, details thereof and compliance/ATR to the notice(s) and present status of the case.

Not applicable

13. A tabular chart with index for point wise compliance of above TOR.

Has been compiled

B SPECIFIC TERMS OF REFERENCE

1. Details on list of hazardous chemicals to be stored along with storage quantities at the facility, their

LPG will be only hazardous material to be stored at the bottling plant.



category (as per MSIHC Rules), MSDS.

2. Mode of receiving hazardous chemicals in isolated storages and mode of their dispatch.

The LPG is received through bulk tank lorries from IOCL LPG plants at “(LPG BP- Madanpur Khadar, LPG BP- Karnal, LPG BP – Jaipur, LPG BP –Mathura, LPG BP –Loni, OMC(GAIL) LPG Hosp. Locn- PATA Jamnagar Terminal, IOCL-Jamnagar Essar, LPG BP –Dumad, Kandla LPG Import Terminal, LPG Import Terminal Porbander, LPG Import Terminal Pipavav)”.

3. Layout plan of the storage tanks and other associated facilities.

Refer fig.no.2.2 in chapter 2 of the EIA report.

4. Details on types and specifications of the storage facilities including tanks, pumps, piping, valves, flanges, pumps, monitoring equipments, systems for emissions control safety controls including relief systems.

Details on specifications of the storage facilities including tanks, pumps, piping, valves, flanges, pumps, monitoring equipments, etc are given in Chapter 2

5. Arrangements to control loss/leakage of chemicals and management system in case of leakage.

Details of Arrangements to control loss/leakage of chemicals and management system in case of leakage are given in Chapter 2.

6. Risk Assessment & Disaster Management Plan

Identification of hazards

Consequence Analysis

Details of domino effect of the storage tanks and respective preventive measures including distance between storage units in an isolated storage facility.

Onsite and offsite emergency preparedness plan.

Risk assessment report is attached as Annexure IV and V.

S.No TOR Compliance

A STANDARD TERMS OF REFERENCE

1. Executive Summary Executive summary is attached with the EIA report

2. Introduction

(iv) Details of the EIA Consultant including NABET accreditation

Refer Chapter 10 of the EIA report.

(v) Information about the project proponent Refer Section 1.1 in Chapter 1 of the EIA report

(vi) Importance and benefits of the project Refer Section 1.3 in Chapter 1 and Chapter 8 of the EIA report


(xi) Cost of project and time of completion The estimated project cost is 22.14 Crores (section 2.24, Chapter 2). IOCL will start the construction after obtaining the clearance.

(xii) Products with capacities for the proposed project.

Refer Section 2.4 & 2.7.2 in Chapter 2 of the EIA report

(xiii) If expansion project, details of existing products with capacities and whether adequate land is available for expansion, reference of earlier EC if any.

Refer Section 2.4 & 2.14 in Chapter 2 of the EIA report



Specific Terms of Reference (ToR)

B. Specific ToR

S.No TOR Compliance

1. Details on list of hazardous chemicals to be stored along with storage quantities at the facility, their category (as per MSIHC Rules) MSDS.

LPG will be only hazardous material to be stored at the bottling plant.

2. Mode of receiving hazardous chemicals in isolated storages and mode of their dispatch

Receipt: LPG is received through bulk tank lorries from IOCL LPG plants at “(LPG BP- Madanpur Khadar, LPG BP- Karnal, LPG BP – Jaipur, LPG BP –Mathura, LPG BP –Loni, OMC(GAIL) LPG Hosp. Locn- PATA, Jamnagar Terminal, IOCL-Jamnagar Essar, LPG BP –Dumad, Kandla LPG Import Terminal, LPG Import Terminal Porbander, LPG Import Terminal Pipavav)”. Storage: The LPG will be stored in Bullet Tanks and Horton sphere and mounded vessel. The Plant has 24 filling point carousel. Dispatch: Filled cylinders are dispatched to distributors. Presently the cylinders are sent through Packed Lorries to markets of Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand (districts viz. Rampur, Moradabad, Bareilly, Udham Singh Nagar, Badaun, Amroha, Pilibhit, Bijnour, Pauri Garhwal, Nainital,Haridwar, Sambhal . Presently on an average 120-130 packed lorries per day are used for transportation of LPG.)

3. Layout plan of the storage tanks and other associated facilities.

Refer fig.no.2.2 in chapter 2 of the EIA report.

4. Details on types and specifications of the storage facilities including Tanks, Pumps, piping valves, flanges, pumps, monitoring equipment, systems for emissions controls, safety controls including relief systems

Details on specifications of the storage facilities including tanks, pumps, piping, valves, flanges, pumps, monitoring equipment, etc. are given in Chapter 2

5. Aarrangement to control loss/leakage of chemicals and management system in case of leakage.

Details of Arrangements to control loss/leakage of chemicals and management system in case of leakage are given in Chapter 2.

6. Risk Assessment and Disaster Management Plan

Identifications of hazards

Consequence analysis

Details of Domino effect of the storage tank and respective preventive measures including distance between storage units in an isolated storage facility.

Offsite and Onsite emergency preparedness plan

Refer the attachment (IV and V) report Risk Assessment and ERDMP.



Additional Terms of Reference

Meeting TOR Compliance

14th EAC IND2 Meeting

Public hearing to be conducted and issues raised and commitments made by the project proponent on the same should be included in EIA/EMP Report in the form tabular chart with financial budget for complying with the

commitments made.

IOCL Pattikalan submitted Land papers. That mentions the project site lies in notified industrial area. (Refer Annexure I)

26th EAC IND2 Meeting

Public hearing is exempted under the provisions as per para 7 III Stage (3) (b) of the EIA Notification, 2006 being the site located in notified industrial area

-Public hearing exempted. -EIA report has been prepared as per the ToR issued in the 14

th and 26

th EAC

(IND2) meeting.



CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background

Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL), a Govt. of India Enterprise, is the highest ranked Indian public sector company in the prestigious Fortune 'Global 500' listing, ranked 96th position in 2016. Indian Oil Corporation Limited is an Indian state-owned oil and gas corporation with its headquarters in New Delhi, India. It is one of the seventh ‘Maharatna’ status companies of India. IOCL is one of the leading companies in Public Sector engaged in the oil refining and marketing of its products in the country. The Indian Oil Group of companies owns and operates 10 of India's 22 refineries with a combined refining capacity of 65.7 million metric tonnes per year. Oil marketing companies have projected an increase in demand of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in future due to increase in its domestic use. The demand is likely to increase substantially over the years to come. Even in the present scenario, it is very difficult to meet the market demand of Rampur and adjoining areas by Indian Oil Corporation Limited. As per directive of the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Government of India, different Oil companies are required to augment / construct new facilities to meet the growing demand. M/s. Indian Oil Corporation Limited, working under the aegis of Ministry of Petroleum is having an establishment for storage and bottling of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) at Rampur LPG bottling Plant. The existing LPG Plant is under operation at Tehsil: Swar, District: Rampur, Uttar Pradesh with Consent to Operate

[vide letter no: Water Consent: . . . .जल, : 24.10.2016 and

. . . . , : 24.10.2016 (Refer Annexure: III)] from UPPCB. Now, IOCL

intends to enhance storage capacity of LPG (Additional storage vessel) to cater growing demand in Rampur, Moradabad, Sambhal Bareilly, Badaun, Amroha, Pilibhit, Bijnour in UttarPradesh and Pauri Garhwal, Nainital,Haridwar, Udham Singh Nagar in Uttarakhand IOCL proposes for construction of one mounded storage vessel of 900 MT capacity to enhance the storage capacity of Pattikalan Rampur LPG bottling Plant by proposed additional mounded storage vessel. The Plant was established in 2001. The existing storage capacity of LPG is 1,850 MT (1x 1400 MT , 3 x 150 MT) at existing plant and after erection of the proposed one mounded storage vessel (1 x 900 MT ) storage capacity will be 2,750 MT LPG storage. The existing LPG bottling plant is conforming to OISD 144 and OISD standards and guidelines. Environment plays a vital role in overall development of the country. Recognizing the importance of environmental protection and sustainable development, the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC), Government of India had



formulated policies and procedures governing the industrial and other developmental activities to prevent indiscriminate exploitation of natural resources and promote integration of environmental concern in industrial projects. To assess and evaluate potential environmental impacts during design, construction & operation phases and to suggest mitigation measures with detailed environmental management plan, environmental impact assessment study has been conducted for the proposed project. M/s ABC Techno Labs India Private Limited (ABC Techno Labs), NABET Accredited Environmental Consultant Organisation, has been engaged by M/s Indian Oil Corporation (IOCL) to carry out Environmental Impact Assessment studies for the proposed expansion of LPG bottling plant.

1.2 Need of the Expansion of Pattikalan - Rampur LPG Bottling Plant

The current storage capacity of Bulk LPG is 1,850 MT and demand for LPG is ever growing with market and addition of new consumers through Government schemes to reduce pollution due to use of fire wood and safe guard the environment. IOCL has proposed to increase the storage capacity of LPG at its existing LPG bottling plant at Pattikalan-Rampur with addition of 1 no. x 900MT mounded storage vessel.

1.3 Need of EIA

As per EIA Notification S.O. No 1533 issued on 14th September, 2006 and its subsequent amendments, proposed expansion of the LPG Bottling Plant is falling under Schedule 6(b) – Isolated storage & handling of hazardous chemicals. The project involves (General Condition, as per EIA notification 2006) interstate boundaries between Uttarakhand State and Uttar Pradesh State. The distance between the project site and state boundary is 1 KM approx. Hence the project is categorized as ‘Category A’ project. This project will require Environmental Clearance from Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC), Industry-2, from Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC). Accordingly, the EIA Report has been prepared based on the Terms of Reference (ToR) approved during 14th and 26th Meeting of Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) – Industry 2 held on 26th & 27th September, 2016 and 27th & 28th July, 2017 respectively.

1.4 Terms of Reference (TOR):

EAC IND2 Meeting no.

Date of meeting Minutes

14th 26th & 27th September, 2016

* Granted ToR

26th 27th & 28th July, 2017 *Directed to consider and conduct/prepare EIA as per approved ToR in 14th EAC IND2 Meeting. * Public Hearing was exempted.



1.5 Approach Methodology

The primary objective of the EIA study is to internalize and integrate the environmental concerns/aspects and mitigation measures due to proposed expansion of Pattikalan Rampur LPG Bottling Plant. The EIA study for proposed expansion of Pattikalan Rampur LPG Bottling Plant has been carried out with the following objectives: Collection of baseline attributes in study area. The EIA covers baseline

environmental data, as per the guidelines of MoEF&CC. The scope includes collection of baseline data to identify the various environmental parameters such as air, water, soil, noise levels, socio - economic factors, land use factors, the status of the flora- fauna and wildlife in the adjoining areas of the proposed project site.

Identification, prediction, evaluation & mitigation of biophysical, social & other relevant effects of development on the environment during the operational phase of the proposed expansion of Pattikalan Rampur LPG Bottling Plant using mathematical / simulation models as per applicable Indian law.

Preparation of risk assessment & emergency preparedness / disaster management plan for the project.

Preparation of Environmental Management Plan (EMP) to be adopted for mitigation of the anticipated adverse impacts of the proposed expansion of IOCL Pattikalan Rampur LPG Bottling Plant during operational phase.

Delineation of the post project environmental quality monitoring program as per the requirements of the regulatory authorities.

To carry out EIA study for the proposed expansion of Pattikalan Rampur LPG Bottling Plant, reconnaissance survey was conducted by field team of ABC Techno Labs India Pvt. Ltd. and sampling locations for various environmental parameters were identified on the basis of:

Predominant wind direction expected during the period of baseline monitoring in the study area

Topography,

Location of village/towns/sensitive areas

Identified pollution pockets, if any within the study area

Areas, which represent baseline conditions;

Collection, collation and analysis of baseline data for various environmental attributes.

The field studies and primary data collection have been conducted during 30th November, 2016 to 28th February, 2017 to determine existing conditions of various environmental attributes.



The proposed expansion of LPG Bottling Plant could have impact on the physical, chemical and biological attributes of surrounding environment. In assessing the environmental impacts, collection, collation and interpretation of baseline data is of prime importance. Environmental impact analysis and assessment should be preferably carried out at the planning stage itself.

1.6 Environmental Settings

The environmental settings of the Pattikalan LPG Bottling plant are given in following subsections.

1.6.1 Location Details of the Site

The location of LPG bottling plant on Google satellite image and surrounding area is shown in Figure 1.1. Indian Oil Corporation Limited’s Pattikalan Rampur LPG Bottling Plant is located at Tehsil-Swar, District: Rampur, Uttar Pradesh. The longitude-latitude of the centre of Pattikalan LPG Bottling Plant is as follows:

Latitude : 29°9‘ 18. 10"N Longitude : 79°2‘ 41. 27"E

The main geographical features of the Pattikalan LPG Bottling Plant are given below:

The LPG Plant is located industrial area of Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Development Corporation (UPSIDC).

Kashipur railway station is located at distance of about 12 km from LPG bottling plant.

National Highway – 24 is located near the plant.

The average ground level at the LPG Bottling Plant of IOCL is about 192 m above mean sea level.

There is no archaeological monument within the 10 km radius of the LPG plant.

There is no critical polluted area within 10 km radius area.

Uttarakhand state boundary is within 1 km radius.

There is no national park/wildlife sanctuary within 5 km radius area from the LPG Bottling Plant.

Kosi Rivers are flowing at a distance of 400 m towards West away from the plant. Ramganga and its tributaries Kosi, Peela, Khar, Senjani & Gangan are the main rivers flowing in the Rampur district

The location of Pattikalan Rampur LPG Bottling plant on Survey of India toposheet is shown in Figure 1.2. 10 km radius of study area on Google map is given in Figure 1.3.



1.6.2 Accessibility to Plant Site

The nearest railway station from LPG Bottling Plant is Kashipur Railway Station at distance about 12 km. Plant is situated on the national highway 24, the state capital is 302 km in east and national capital is 185 km in west. Nearest operational airport is at Pantnagar Airport, which is about 49 km from the IOCL Pattikalan Rampur LPG Bottling Plant.



Figure 1.2: IOCL Pattikalan location marked on Toposheet



Figure 1.3: 10 Radius study area on Google earth around LPG bottling



1.7 EIA Report Presentation

The EIA report for additional LPG mounded storage vessel at existing LPG plant in Rampur UPSIDC area has been prepared as per Terms of Reference (ToR) approved during approved during 14th Meeting of Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) – Industry 2 held on 26th & 27th September, 2016 for proposed construction of one LPG mounded storage vessel The EIA report has been presented in order to group the environmental parameters under physical, biological, demographic & socio-economic environments, anticipated impacts and mitigation measures. The EIA report has been prepared as contents given in EIA Notification 2006 and subsequent amendments. The structure of EIA Report is as given below:

Compliance of TOR

Executive Summary: given in the beginning of the report. Chapter 1: Introduction This chapter provides background information, brief location settings of the area. The terms of reference for preparation of EIA/ EMP and structure of EIA report have also been described in this chapter. Chapter 2: Description of the Project This chapter deals project details, project layout, design details, operating parameters, power requirements, water requirement and sources pollution and it management, cost of proposed expansion, etc. Chapter 3: Description of the Environment This chapter presents existing environmental status of the 10km radius study area around the proposed project including topography, geological, drainage pattern, water environment, climate & meteorology, ambient air quality, noise levels, flora & fauna, socio-economic, etc. Chapter 4: Anticipated Environmental Impacts & Mitigation Measures This chapter describes the anticipated impact on the environment and mitigation measures for proposed project. Assessment of anticipated environmental impacts. It gives the details of the impact on the baseline parameters, both during the construction and operational phases and suggests the mitigation measures to be implemented by the IOCL. Chapter 5: Analysis of Alternatives This chapter examines alternative means for the proposed project



Chapter 6: Environmental Monitoring Plan This chapter describes Environmental Monitoring Plan for the proposed project during construction and operation phases. Chapter 7: Additional Studies (Risk Analysis and Disaster Management Plan) This chapter spelled out hazard identification, risk analysis and disaster management plan for an unlikely event of emergency at LPG Plant. Chapter 8: Project Benefits This chapter includes the benefits in terms of improvement in physical infrastructure, social infrastructure, employment potential, etc. Chapter 9: Environmental Management Plan (EMP) This chapter describes environmental management plan to mitigate adverse environmental impacts and to strengthen beneficial impacts. Chapter 10: Disclosure of Consultant engaged This chapter comprises the name of consultants engaged with their brief resume and nature of consultancy rendered.



CHAPTER 2:

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

2.1 Introduction

Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL), Pattikalan Rampur Bottling LPG plant is a limited capacity bottling plant (Storage Capacity – 1,850 MT) in Uttar Pradesh, caters to Rampur, Moradabad, Sambhal Bareilly, Badaun, Amroha, Pilibhit, Bijnour in Uttarpradesh and Pauri Garhwal, Nainital,Haridwar, Udham Singh Nagar in Uttarakhand and feeds approximately 120 distributors with consumer base of around 7.84 Lakhs. The safety record of the installation is excellent with a cumulative “Zero” in-plant accident or Lost Time Accidents (LTA) record of 4.66 Million Man-hours worked, since commissioning in 2001 till date. The Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Indane Bottling Plant, Pattikalan is spread across the total area of 33 acres having the capacity of 1,850 MT. The bulk LPG is received from the tankers by road transport. The LPG is transferred by means of differential pressure mechanism with the help of a compressor and stored in the above ground bullets and Horton Spheres. LPG is then pumped and filled in cylinders using filling machines called Carousels. Bottling of LPG cylinders is carried out for different capacities such as 5.0 kg, 14.2 kg, 19.0 kg and 47.5 kg cylinders.

2.2 Needs of Capacity Enhancement

The project being proposed is important in view of the distribution of LPG to the consumers and Prime Minister has announced LPG connection to rural & remote area where fire wood is used predominantly. Therefore this project has nation importance and will also contribute to the socio economic development the region. The demand for LPG is growing with market and addition of new consumers through Government schemes to reduce pollution due to use of fire wood and safe guard the environment. IOCL has proposed to increase the storage capacity of LPG at their existing LPG bottling plant with addition of 1 No. x 900 MT mounded storage vessel.

2.3 Project Location

Indian Oil Corporation Limited, (a Govt. of India Enterprise), working under the aegis of Ministry of Petroleum is having an establishment for storage and bottling of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) at Pattikalan Rampur LPG bottling. The LPG Plant is under operation at Tehsil: Swar, District: Rampur, Uttar Pradesh, Now, IOCL intends to enhance



Storage capacity of LPG (Additional storage vessel) to cater growing demand in markets of Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand. The site plan for LPG Plant is shown in Figure 2.1.

Figure 2.1: Location of IOCL Pattikalan LPG Bottling Plant on Google Satellite Image



Figure 2.2: Layout for Existing LPG Plant with locations of Proposed Mounded Vessel



2.4 Existing & Proposed LPG Storage Capacity

The details of existing LPG storage capacities and after enhancement are given In Table 2.1.

Table 2.1: Details of Existing and Proposed LPG Storage Capacities

Sr. No.

Product Total Capacity Status

1. Horton Sphere 1,400 MT Existing

2. LPG Bullets 3 x 150 MT Existing

3. LPG mounded Vessel 1 x 900 MT Proposed

Total capacity after expansion 2,750 MT

2.5 Earthquake Resistant Measures for LPG Storage Vessel

The LPG plant is located in seismic Zone 4, design parameters has taken account for seismic forces. Design of existing ground above bullets and proposed mounded storage vessel has taken consideration of following:

IS 1893 (Part 2) 2014 - Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures : Liquid retaining Tanks – Elevated and Ground Supported.

IS 1893 (Part 4) :2005- Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures-Part 4 Industrial Structures Including Stack Like Structures.

As per IS 1893 (Part 2) 2014, dynamic earth pressure is taken into account while computing the base shear of a partially or fully buried tank. Earth pressure is also being considered in the design of walls. In buried tanks, dynamic earth pressure is not be relied upon to reduce dynamic effects due to liquid. Ground supported tanks (particularly, steel tanks) are checked for failure against buckling. Similarly, safety of shaft type of staging of elevated tanks against buckling is ensured. Piping systems connected to tanks is consider the potential movement of the connection points during earthquake and provide for sufficient flexibility to avoid damage. The piping system is designed so as not to impart significant mechanical loading on tank. Local loads at pipe connections are considered in the design of the tank. Mechanical devices, which add flexibility to piping such as bellows, expansion joints and other special couplings, are also used in the piping connections.

2.6 Access to the LPG Plant

Tank lorries for transporting bulk LPG and trucks for transportation of empty and filled cylinders are approached at the LPG plant. The LPG Plant is located industrial area of Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Development Corporation (UPSIDC). The plant lies near NH 24.



The plant is operated in 3 shifts:- -A Shift : 6:00-14:00 hrs, -B shift : 14:00 – 22:00 hrs & -General shift : 9:00 – 17:30) . -Details of traffic due to Pattikalan LPG Plant on access road from NH-24 are given in Table 2.2.

Table 2.2: Traffic Due to Pattikalan Rampur LPG Plant

S.No. Lorries Movement Per Day (Average)

I. Existing LPG Plant

1. Bulk LPG Tank Lorries (Coming) 32

2. Bulk LPG Tank Lorries (Returning) 32

3. Truck Bringing with Empty Cylinder 125

4. Truck Carrying with filled Cylinder 125

II. LPG Plant After Expansion (additional)

1. Bulk LPG Tank Lorries (Coming) 34

2. Bulk LPG Tank Lorries (Returning) 34

3. Truck Bringing with Empty Cylinder 128

4. Truck Carrying with filled Cylinder 128

Approach road from NH 24 to Kashipur - Rudrapur Road is one lanes with shoulders, which is capable for 15,000 PCU per day. Current traffic on the Kashipur - Rudrapur Road (from NH -24) is about 6,750 PCU per day. On approach road from Kashipur - Rudrapur road to LPG plant, which is also one lane with shoulders, traffic is 1,564 PCU per day. Therefore, existing access road from NH 24 to LPG Plant is sufficient to bear additional traffic after capacity enhancement of Pattikalan LPG Plant.

2.7 LPG Storage & Filling Process Description

The process at LPG bottling plant involves the following steps:



Figure 2.3: Process flow diagram

2.7.1 Receipt of LPG

The LPG is received through bulk tank lorries from IOCL LPG plants at “(LPG BP- Madanpur Khadar, LPG BP- Karnal, LPG BP – Jaipur, LPG BP –Mathura, LPG BP –Loni, OMC(GAIL) LPG Hosp. Locn- PATA Jamnagar Terminal, IOCL-Jamnagar Essar, LPG BP –Dumad, Kandla LPG Import Terminal, LPG Import Terminal Porbander, LPG Import Terminal Pipavav)”.

2.7.2 Storage of LPG

In present scenario, LPG is storage of one Horton sphere 1400 MT capacity and three above ground bullets of 150 capacity each. With the addition of proposed one 900 MT capacity mounded storage vessel for enhancement of storage capacity, total storage will be 2,750 MT. The details of tanks with sizes are detailed in Table 2.3.



Table 2.3 : Details of LPG Storage Vessel at Pattikalan Plant

Tank No. Tank Diameter (m)

Tank/ Length (m)

Tank type

Storage Pressure (kg/cm2)

Tank Capacity

(MT)

Existing LPG Storage Bullets ↓

Bullet 1 3.8 28.7 AG 14.5 150

Bullet 2 3.8 28.7 AG 14.5 150

Bullet 3 3.8 28.7 AG 14.5 150

Existing LPG Horton sphere ↓

Horton Sphere

Height 18 M AG 14.5 1400

Proposed LPG Storage Vessel ↓

Proposed mounded vessel

7 54.162 UG 14.5 900

Facility Description

The Bottling plant has no manufacturing activities. The facility receives LPG via tankers and stores in Horton Spheres & Bullets using differential pressure mechanism (through compressors). The LPG is pumped to the bottling plant, where cylinders of varying capacities are dispatched to various consumers. The Bottling plant has following facilities:

Receipt of LPG Tankers (32 tankers per day having various capacities such as 11 MT, 17 MT, etc.);

Unloading of LPG from road tankers, one gantry with eight bays.

Storage of LPG in Horton Spheres (1400 MT);

Storage of LPG in Bullets (3×150 MT);

LPG Pump House (3 Bottling Pumps)

LPG Compressors (total four compressors; one of them having a flow rate of 60 m3/hr and one with a flow rate of 128 m3/hr and one with a flow rate of 252 m3/hr )

The Bottling Plant has one Carousel with 24 filing points each and associated facilities; Associated facilities for carrying out above tasks / operating above facilities including fire fighting facilities.

2.7.3 Filling of Cylinders

Empty cylinders from empty cylinder storage shed are drawn in the filling shed by chain conveyer. LPG is filled by means of rotary machines called "Carousel". The carousel consists of a rotating frame with conveyer system, a central column for gas and air and a hydraulic driving unit, which rotates the carousel frame. The speed of the driving unit is variable so that the rotation of the carousel can be adapted to various filling capacities. The 2 nos. of carousel frame is equipped with 24 filling guns,. LPG filling machine mounted on the carousel works on gross weighing principle. The machine is preset for the net filling required



in the cylinders. The cylinders are placed on the machine and the filling head is connected to the cylinder valve and LPG supply valve opens. The filling machine is adjusted for the respective tare weight of the cylinders. The filling gets automatically cut off when the total gross weight reaches.

2.7.4 Filled Cylinder Storage Shed

Filled cylinder shed of size 22.4 m x 47.6 m with finger loading platform have been provided. Filling shed & filled cylinder shed are interconnected by gangway for conveyors. Similarly, gangway connection has been provided between filing shed and valve change shed. Statistical quality control loop (SQC) with chain conveyor has been provided with an inline check scale and CVT. All the loading/unloading fingers and gangway have been provided with sprinkler coverage.

2.7.5 Checking of Weight and Leak Testing

After filling, every cylinder is checked for its weight on a check weighing scale (permissible limits as per gas cylinder rules 1981 is (-) 100 gms to (+) 200 gms and the cylinders having less weight or more weight are segregated. The cylinders are checked for valve leakage by Automatic valve testing System and then checking for leaks by submerging cylinders up to bung under water as per prevailing practice. After leak testing the cylinders are sent to filled cylinder storage area by means of chain conveyers where they are stacked and kept as per standard norms laid down by IOCL & also as per Gas Cylinder Rules, 1981.

2.7.6 Air Removal from New And Repaired Cylinders and LPG Vapor Filling - Purging Unit

This unit fills LPG vapour in cylinders (new and repaired) after sucking the air from cylinders by vacuum pumps. This operation is highly essential to eliminate the possibility of forming explosive mixture. Vacuum is created up to 494 mm of Hg inside the cylinder and then LPG vapour is passed from LPG filled cylinder upto a pressure of 1 kg/cm2 before using them for filling.

2.7.7 Evacuation of Overfilled Cylinders

The overfilled cylinders are sent to a correction unit. The correction unit is having a vacuum pump to evacuate the excess LPG, and this excess LPG is pushed back to the pressure vessel through return line. Similarly defective cylinders are evacuated to the permissible levels through the vacuum pump and the LPG so recovered is pumped back to the pressure vessel through return line and then the residual LPG is vented out through cold flaring.

2.7.8 Storage of Filled Cylinders & Transportation

Filled cylinders after leak testing, testing of weight and fixing safety caps are stacked in the filling shed near the delivery end as per rules laid down by IOCl & also gas cylinder rules, 1981. Filled cylinders are delivered only to the authorized dealers. Drivers of the trucks carrying LPG are having valid license and are having training in safety & fire fighting procedures.



2.8 Dispatch

Filled cylinders are dispatched to distributors. Presently the cylinders are sent through Packed Lorries to markets of Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand (districts viz. Rampur, Moradabad, Bareilly, Udham Singh Nagar, Badaun, Amroha, Pilibhit, Bijnour, Pauri Garhwal, Nainital,Haridwar, Sambhal . Presently on an average 120-130 packed lorries per day are used for transportation of LPG.)

2.9 LPG Pumps, Compressor Shed and Air Drying Unit

The pump house comprising area of 8 m x 24 m, having 3 nos. LPG pumps (One pump having 85 m3/hr and one pumps having 48 m3/hr with discharge pressure of 16.9kg/cm2. There are 4 nos PD type LPG vapour compressors, one compressors are of 21 CFM, one of 75 CFM and one of 148 CFM. The LPG plant has 4 PD type compressor one having capacity 0.6 m3/min and one having 2.13 m3/min and one having 4.2 m3/min each with discharge pressure 12 kg/cm2..

2.10 Fire Fighting Facilities

The following fire fighting facilities will be provided at the proposed LPG bottling plant: Table 2.4: Fire Fighting details

Fire Fighting Facilities at the Plant





Sand Bucket (9 Liter’s) : 20 Nos.

Water Storage Capacity : 4,150 KL X 2 nos.

Deluge Valves (Sprinklers) : 17 Nos.

Main Fire Pump (410 kL/hr) : 7 Nos.

Jockey Pump (30 KL/hr) : 2 Nos.

Deluge Valve with heat Detector : 17 Nos.

Water Monitors : 34 Nos.

Fire Hydrant : 22Nos.

Hose Box : 23Nos.

Fire Hose : 58Nos.

Jet Nozzle : 27 Nos.

Fog Nozzle : 2 Nos

Universal Nozzle : 2 Nos

Water Curtain Nozzle : 2 Nos.

Pressurised fire hydrant system : Available

Fire Engine : 410 kl/hr X 7 nos.



Other necessary facilities to support fire fighting during emergency are as given below:

Internal communication : page phone, VHF hand sets, public address system

External communication : landline and mobile

Warning system for fire: 1 no. electrical siren with 3 km range and 7 hand siren with range 1 km.

2.11 Tank Lorry Unloading Bay

Eight LPG unloading bay TLD gantry of size 15 m x 5.5 m for unloading of tank lorry have been provided. All unloading bays have been provided with suitable unloading arms. Filling of bullet and Horton Sphere through 6” pipe is carried out.

2.12 Safe Distance and Inter-distances

The safety distances and inter distances between facilities are given in Table 2.5.

Unit Particulars Recommended as per OISD (Mtrs).

Actual (Mtrs)

1. Between Tanks i) Bullet –1 ii) Bullet -2 iii) Bullet -3 iv) Horton Sphere

4 4 4 9

4 4 4

74

2. Between tank & LPG pump house

15 19

3. Between tank farm & TLF 30 127(from bullet), 55 (from Horton sphere)

4. Between tank and fire water pump house

60 250(from bullet), 160(from H/S).

5. Between pump house & sub-station

60 190

6. Between storage tanks & compound wall

90,30 90,30

7. Between TLF & office 60 75

8. Between Fire Pump house & Loading Shed

60 72

2.13 Land-use of LPG Bottling Plant

The IOCL Plant is located on 33.25 Acres area of land and is sufficient for its existing and proposed enhancement. The land use of the proposed LPG plant is given in Table 2.5.

Table 2.6: Land-use of LPG Bottling Plant

Sr. No. Particulars Area (m2) Area in Acres

1 Plant Area (Admin & Process ) 18,537 4.58

2. Green Belt area 44,405 10.97



3. Total plot area 1,34,558 33.25

The dimensions of facility available at the Pattikalan LPG Plant are given in Table 2.6.

Table 2.7: Dimensions of Facility Available at IOCL Pattikalan LPG Plant

S.No. Facility Dimensions In M2

1 Admin Building 350

2 Cycle/Car/Scooter Shed 240

3 Security Room 25

4 Weigh Bridge ( Electronic) 45

5 Weigh Bridge Cabin 120

6 Fire Water Tank (2 Nos.) 4150 Kl 22m dia. x 10 m Ht.

7 Fire Water Pump House 300

8 Transformer Yard 31.32

9 Canteen/Sports Room 500

10 Electric Sub Station 229.44

11 DG Set Room 123.24

12 Scrap Yard 75

13 Bulk Unloading Bays 8 nos. 5.5 x15.5 (each bay)

14 Planning Office 120

15 Dress Change Room 104

16 LPG Pump Compressor House 192

17 LPG Storage Vessel (150mtx3nos.) (3.8 dia x 28.7 length each Bullet )

18 PCVO Crew Rest Room 104

19 Empty / Filling Shed 4,189.92

20 Field Cylinder Shed 1,088.24

21 Inspection Platform 1 No.

22 Tank Lorry Parking Area 7000 Sq.M

23 Air Compressor Cw Pump House 150

24 Cooling Tower 2 Nos

25 Cylinder Loading Area 376.2

26 Unloading Area 376.2

27 Toilet 5 Nos

28 Diesel Tank 1 (18mX15m)

29 Consumable Store 300

30 Workshop 37.5

31 Dept. Shed Incl. Valve Change Shed 828.48

32 LPG Storage Vessel (1 Horton Sphere.) 18 M Height

33 Bulk Unloading Shed (2 Nos.) 560

34 CP Room 120



2.15 Power Requirement

The maximum contract demand for the industry is about 350 KW which is to be obtained from Uttarakhand Power Corporation Ltd (UPCL). DG Sets with 2 x 500 KVA, DG SET 1 x 250 KVA, DG SET 1 x 100 KVA will be operated during power failure.

2.16 Truck Parking Area

Approximately 7000 sqm area has been earmarked for parking of tank lorries.

2.17 Gas Monitoring System

Gas monitoring system with infra red / Catalytic type sensors have been provided as per revised OISD standard-144. Mimic & repeater panels have been provided at Fire Water Pump House /Control room and security gate.

2.18 Plant Security System

The provision of following facilities has been ensured:

Handheld metal detector for frisking

Door Frame Metal detector

Mirror trolley

Integrated Biometric Access Control System

Digital Surveillance through CCTV cameras with memory back-up for 15 days. All critical areas i.e. Admin Bldg, Filling shed, LPG Pump House, Tank Farm, TLD Gantry, Parking and Gate areas to be covered under constant surveillance.

Perimeter surveillance

Sufficient High mast illumination in parking as well as for plant.

2.19 Communication System

The following systems are available at the existing LPG Plant:

Intrinsically Safe Paging System

PA System for announcement at gate

Inter-com at all working stations/points as per advice

Walkie-talkie for designated staff(VHF/UHF)

Display of carousel performance at TC cabin & Planning

2.20 Process Parameters & Design Basis

The proposed three mounded storage vessel have been designed based on the following statutory codes / standards:

1. OISD Standard 144 Latest Revision



2. OISD Standard 150 Latest Revision 3. SMPV (U) Rules – 1981 4. Gas Cylinder Rules – 1981 5. ASME / API / BIS Codes Pertaining To LPG 6. Factories Act – 1948 7. Electrical Installation Under Electricity Rules --1956

2.21 Safety Philosophy

LPG is a common clean fuel used extensively in households as well as industry. If its characteristics are understood well and proper precautions as stipulated in various codes and standards are followed, it is an easy and safe fuel to handle. Accordingly, in most of the developed /developing countries, where LPG is consumed in million tons / year, specific codes and standards are available for storing and handling of LPG.

2.21.1 LPG Installations - Codes & Standards

Codes and standards which are generally followed for LPG installations are as follows: 1. NFPA (National Fire Protection Association of USA) Standards - NFPA-58: Standard for the Storage and Handling of Liquefied Petroleum Gases - NFPA-59 : LP-Gases at Utility Gas Plants 2. API (American Petroleum Institute) Standards - API-2510: Design & Construction of LPG installations 3. IP (Institute of Petroleum) Standards - IP-9: Liquefied Petroleum Gas - Large Bulk Storage of Pressurized and Refrigerated LPG 4. The Static and Mobile Pressure Vessel (Unfired) Rules, 1981 of India (SMPV Rules) 5. OISD (Oil Industry Safety Directorate) Guidelines - OISD RP - 158 : Recommended Practices on Storage and Handling of Bulk Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG), 1997. (This is being followed by Public Sector Refineries and Oil Industry in India. It is currently a guide and not a mandatory code or standard). LPG storage tanks take any other pressurized vessel may be designed as per any of the following well known international or local codes / standards:

- ASME, Section VIII, Division I

- ASME, Section VIII, Division II

- BS 5500

- IS 2825

2.21.2 Mounded Storage for LPG

LPG is normally stored in above ground storage mainly spheres and cylindrical bullets, namely, bullets & Horton spheres, the advantage being their accessibility for regular inspection and maintenance which is important for such storage for hazardous service. But these storages are susceptible to fire impingement and can give rise to Boiling Liquid Expanding Vapour Explosions (BLEVE).



The reason for selecting mounded or buried bullets for LPG storage is to protect them from direct flame impingement caused by any eventual fire in the surroundings and thus prevent initiation of the sequence of events leading to an occurrence of BLEVE. The mounded storage concept basically originated from Europe and specialized codes exist in Germany such as: DIN 4681 Tl: Statutory Steel Pressure Vessel for Liquified Petroleum Gases for Earth Covered Installations, Dimensions and Equipment. During construction phase, a slight increase in the ambient noise levels is anticipated. This impact will be temporary and limited to the construction phase. Hence no permanent impact on this account is expected. During the operational phase, no major social impact in the general area is expected. There will be no change in the occupational structure of the workforce. As there will be no emissions into air, no liquid effluents and no solid wastes no negative impact on the health of the inhabitants in and around the project site is expected.

2.22 Earthquake Resistant Measures for LPG Storage Vessel

The LPG plant is located in seismic Zone 4, design parameters has taken account for seismic forces. Design of existing ground above bullets and proposed mounded storage vessel has taken consideration of following:

IS 1893 (Part 2) 2014 - Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures : Liquid

retaining Tanks – Elevated and Ground Supported

IS 1893 (Part 4) :2005- Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures-Part 4

Industrial Structures Including Stack Like Structures

As per IS 1893 (Part 2) 2014, dynamic earth pressure is taken into account while computing the base shear of a partially or fully buried tank. Earth pressure is also be considered in the design of walls. In buried tanks, dynamic earth pressure is not be relied upon to reduce dynamic effects due to liquid. Ground supported tanks (particularly, steel tanks) are checked for failure against buckling. Similarly, safety of shaft type of staging of elevated tanks against buckling is ensured. Piping systems connected to tanks is consider the potential movement of the connection points during earthquake and provide for sufficient flexibility to avoid damage. The piping system is designed so as not to impart significant mechanical loading on tank. Local loads at pipe connections are considered in the design of the tank. Mechanical devices, which add flexibility to piping such as bellows, expansion joints and other special couplings, are also used in the piping connections.

2.23 Geotechnical Investigation for Safe Bearing Capacity Mounded Storage

Vessel

During design of mounded storage vessel, safe bearing capacity analysis of the foundation will be essentially carried out through geotechnical investigation to ensure zero settling of the mounded storage tanks during operation phase or earthquake.



2.24 Project Cost

The estimated project cost is Rs 22.14 Crores for additional LPG mounded storage vessel at LPG Plant of Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.

2.25 Water Requirement and Waste Water Generation

Total water requirement at the existing LPG bottling plant is 3 KLD, which meet through the borewell onsite. Approx 2.4 KLD waste water is generated, which is treated in septic tank followed by soak pit at the existing LPG plant.

Figure: 2.4: Water Flow Diagram

2.26 Solid Wastes and Hazardous Wastes

2.26.1 Solid Wastes

From the LPG bottling plant, 22.4 kg/day domestic solid waste is generated, which is collected and disposed as per provision of Municipal Solid Wastes (Management and Handling) Rules, 2000.

Table 2.5: Solid Waste generation details at the plant

Total no. of employees 112

Assuming per capita solid waste generation rate as 0.20 kg/capita/day

Quantity of solid waste generated 22.4 kg/day

Organic solid waste : 60 % of the total waste 13.44 kg/day

Inorganic solid waste : 40 % of the total waste

8.96 kg/day

Disposal of domestic solid waste The domestic wastes are segregated at source, collected in bins and composted.

Total Water Requirement 3 KLD

Sewage generated 1.4

KLD

Sewage (1.4 KLD) passed through Oil grease trap, the septic tank and soak

pit

Gardening 1 KLD



2.26.2 Hazardous Waste Generation

The hazardous wastes generated at the LPG pant is about 540 liters per annum spent oil from DG set which is stored in MS drums and sent to authorized recyclers. Details of hazardous waste generation are as given below:

2.27 Air Pollution Sources

The major air pollution sources from the LPG Plant are 125 kVA, 250 kVA and 500 KVA capacity DG sets. These generator sets are provided with stack of stipulated height as per consent of UPPCB which is adequate to disperse the gaseous emissions of the resort to the surrounding environment.

The sources of air pollution, type of fuel used, fuel consumption and chimney height details are indicated in the Table 2.5.

Table 2.: Air Pollution Sources, Fuel Consumption and Stack Height Details

Sn. Stack details Stack Attached to

a. Physical details D.G sets

b. Capacity Existing: 2 x 500 KVA, 1 x 250 KVA, 1 x 100 KVA will be operated during power failure using HSD

c. Fuel quantity (Diesel) 15 L/ Hr for 100 KVA, 48 L/Hr for 250 KVA, 90 L/Hr for 500 KVA DG set. Fuel- 4.8 KL pm

d. Fuel used HSD

e. Stack height* Stack height is 10 meters from the roof. stack height- 3 m

f. Control measures Acoustic enclosures are provided.

2.28 Noise Generation and its Management

The major sources of noise pollution in the LPG Plant are the DG sets for which acoustic enclosure has been provided. Also ambient noise levels are ensured within the ambient standards by inbuilt design of mechanical equipment and building apart from vegetation (tree plantations) along the periphery and at various locations within the LPG Plant premises.



CHAPTER 3: DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENT

3.1 Introduction

The reconnaissance survey of the area around the Rampur LPG Bottling plant was carried out on 19th and 22nd of November 2016 and the field studies were carried out for one season (30th November, 2016 to 28th February, 2017) during post monsoon season for the EIA studies to collect baseline primary and secondary data for the present environmental scenario in the study area. A comprehensive primary and secondary data collection program ware undertaken to assess the status of baseline environment conditions within the study area, as per the TOR issued by MOEF&CC for carrying out the EIA/EMP study for one season from December 2016 to February 2017 during post monsoon season. The area covered by 10 km radius around the project site has been considered for study. The environmental monitoring has been carried out for ambient air quality, water quality, soil characteristics, noise levels and meteorology. Land, surface and ground water, soil, meteorology, ambient air, ambient noise constitute the physical environment, while flora and fauna constitute the biological environment of the study area. Demographic and socio-economic conditions of the study area were also studied during the study period. Physical, biological and socio-economic environmental conditions within 10 km radius study have been comprehensively discussed in the following sections. Following Industries are situated within the 10 KM of area (radial distance) in the study area of the project site:

Table 3.1: Industries that lies in 10 km (Radial) study area from the project site

Sr.no Industry Name Type/Products Distance (Radial)

1 India Glycol Ltd. Pharmaceuticals and Organics 4.50 KM

2 Bazpur Sugar Factory Sugar 9.40 KM

3.2 Topography

The project location lies entirely in the Gangetic plain (The Gangetic Plain in the centre - Highly fertile alluvial soils; flat topography broken by numerous ponds, lakes and rivers; slope 2 m/km). Ramganga and its tributaries Kosi, Peela, Khar, Senjani & Gangan are the main rivers flowing in the district. The topography of Rampur district is mainly a plain landmass. The proposed site is flat without any undulation with average elevation of 206 m above msl. There is no reserve forest located in the study area.



Figure 3.1: Topographic image of the Project location



Figure 3.2: Geological Map of Uttar Pradesh

3.2 Climate:

Rainfall

The average annual rainfall of the district is 967 mm. About 85% of the rainfall is received during June to September.

Temperature

May is the hottest month of the year with mean daily maximum temperature at about 46°C and mean daily minimum temperature about 40°C. With the advance of the southwest monsoon the day temperature drops appreciably but the night continue to be warm. January is the coldest month with the mean daily maximum temperature at 21°C and mean daily minimum temperature about 8°C. The mean monthly maximum temperature is 29.4°C and mean monthly minimum temperature is 12°C.

Relative Humidity

The mean monthly morning relative humidity is 69% and the mean monthly evening relative humidity 51%.



Wind Direction

The winds flows most frequently from west (W), followed by the wind from the east (E) and northwest (NW). The frequency of winds from west (W), east (E) and northwest (NW) are 28%, 12% and 8% respectively, however the winds are calms on 37 % during the study period. The winds are rarely flow from south southeast (SSE), south southwest (SSW) directions. Wind are generally light, the mean wind velocity is 5-1 kph. The potential evapo-transpiration rate is 1402.8 mm.

Figure 3.3: Wind Rose diagram

3.2 Geology & Geomorphology

Figure 3.4 : Geomorphology of Rampur District



Udham Singh nagar district (Uttarakhand) and Rampur district (Uttar Pradesh) is a part of Central Ganga Alluvial Plain and represented by high relief in the northern parts, which gradually flatten as towards south. The following geomorphic units have been identified. a) Tarai Tract: This tract is southerly extension of the Tarai tract of Nanital district. It occupies the northern most part of the district. This tract is marked by shallow water level conditions and flowing wells at places. b) Meander Flood Plain: It is a flat low lying, poorly drained area of little or no relief confined to the river channels of Ram Ganga, Kosi, Pilkhau. Point bars and Sand bars are typical geomorphic features in this unit. c) Younger Alluvial Plain: These plain areas are characterised by a flat to gently sloping and slightly undulating topography and are limited to the areas along Kosi, Pilakhau and Ram Ganga rivers with maximum lateral extension of about 10 Kms. The fluvial landform such as palaeo-channels, meander scars, oxbow-lakes are common features. d) Older Alluvial Plain: The area lying south of Terai tract is older alluvial plain or upland. This plain occupies a much higher elevation than the younger alluvial plain and forms the inter stream area. This plain covers about 80% of the area in the district. e) Ravinous Tract: This tract is formed by erosional activity of runoff water and characterised by the neonerk of gullies along river Kosi, Pilakhau and Ram Ganga.

3.4 Minerals

No mineral are available in the district.

3.3 Natural Hazards and Disaster Risk

The project area lies in High Damage Risk Zone-IV. The study area is not in a flood prone area.

3.5 Hydrogeology

District Rampur lies over alluvial deposits of the quaternary period brought by river systems of Ganga and Ram Ganga. These comprise sand, silt and clays in various proportions. There are four aquifer groups present in the area down to 440 mbgl. The first aquifer group, comprising fine to medium sand is utilised, mostly for 8 irrigational purpose follows the top soil and extends down to depth of 60 to 90 mbgl. This aquifer shows presence of clay lenses at places. The first aquifer is followed by a clay layer of varying thickness from 10-24 m. The second aquifer is a intermixing zone in which clay and sand layers are intercalated. This zone extends from 90 m to 160 m at Milak and 125 m to 204 m at Bazpur of Nanital district. The



third aquifer occurs at a depth range of 240 to 300 mbgl. The fourth aquifer which is quite thick at Milak extends from 294 m to total explored depth of 440 m. Ground water in shallow zones occurs under unconfined conditions whereas in the deeper zone it occurs under semi confined to confined conditions. The depth to water level in year during premonsoon period varies from 4.83 to 8.68 mbgl. Whereas in postmonsoon period it varies from 2.02 to 7.10 mbgl. The fluctuation in water level between pre & post monsoon period from 0.0 to 3.23 m.

Pre Monsoon Water levels U.P. State Post Monsoon Water Levels U.P. state



Figure 3.5: Pre Monsoon and Post Monsoon Water levels in Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand state.

Soil Characteristics: Depending upon the profile of the area various fertile types of soils have been developed in different geomorphic units. Fine textured, organic matter rich soil occur in tarai tract. Loamy soil developed in uplands. Silty soil occur in younger alluvial plains. The type of soil has played a vital role in deciding the land utilization pattern of the district. To understand the soil characteristics of the study area, 4 locations in the study area were selected for soil sampling. The soil sampling locations are shown in Figure 3.5. Composite sampling of soil upto root depth (10 – 15 cm) was carried out at each location.

Figure 3.6: Soil Sampling Location in the Study Area

Sr. No.

Sampling Location IOCL, Pattikalan



Table 3.2: Soil Sampling Location in the Study Area

The value of important physical and chemical parameters of these soil samples are given in Table 3.1. From the tabulated values, the following conclusions can be made about the physical and chemical characteristics of the soil samples. Colour: Soil samples from all four locations are brownish. Texture: Soil samples from all four locations are loam, clay, and sandy in texture. Water Holding Capacity (WHC): Water holding capacity (WHC) of soil samples of the study area ranges between 41 % to 45 % and these soils have good capability of retaining sufficient water during irrigation for facilitating the plant growth. Bulk Density: Bulk density of soil in the study area is found to be in the range from 1.20 to 1.27 g/cm3. pH: pH was determined by taking 1:5 ratio of soil and distilled water. pH of soil in the study area is found to be slightly alkaline in the range of 7.1 to 7.9. Sodium: Sodium content of the soil samples in the study area is in range 18.2 to 19.3 mg/1000 g. Total Nitriogen: content in soil sample of the study area is found in the range of 21.84 to 22.85 mq/1000 g. Calcium: Calcium content in soil samples ranges from 1,226.0 to 1,312.0 mg/1000g. Magnesium: Content in soil samples of the study area is found in the range of 169.8 to 175 mq/1000g. Organic Carbon: Organic Carbon in the soil sample ranges from 1.5 to 2.1 %.

Table 3.3: Soil Characteristics in the Study Area

Sn Parameters Unit Project site Chanakpur

Semra Larpur

Mundia kalan

1 pH - 7.9 7.1 7.5 7.3

2 Conductivity Mho/cm 125.0 112.0 116.0 120.0

3 Moisture % 9.3 8.4 7.9 9.4

4 Water Hoilding % 44 41 42 45

Direction Dist. (Km) Latitude Longitude

1 S1 Premises of project site

- - 29.154108° 79.044301°

2 S2 Chanakpur WNW 7.09 km 29.169697° 78.974157°

3 S3 Semra Larpur SSE 2.58 km 29.122954° 79.058935°

4 S4 Mundia Kalan E 8.85 km 29.153908° 79.135147°



Capacity

5 Bulk Density gm/cm3 1.20 1.22 1.25 1.27

6 Total Nitrogen mg/Kg 22.85 22.40 21.84 22.68

7 Potassium as K mg/Kg 40.9 41.4 40.7 42.6

8 Phosphorus as P2O5

mg/Kg 16.7 16.3

16.5 17.3

9 Zinc as Zn mg/Kg 15.20 15.30 15.60 16.10

10 Iron as Fe mg/Kg 29.5 30.8 30.6 32.2

11 Copper as Cu mg/Kg 3.8 3.4 3.3 3.5

12 Sulphur mg/Kg 14.2 14.7 15.1 14.8

13 Sodium mg/Kg 18.6 18.2 19.3 18.7

14 Calcium as Ca mg/Kg 1,260.0 1,226.0 1,312.0 1,238.0

15 Magnesium as Mg mg/Kg 175.0 171.3 169.8 170.6

16 Lead as Pb mg/Kg BDL BDL BDL BDL

17 Chromium as Cr mg/Kg BDL BDL BDL BDL

18 Cadmium as Cd mg/Kg BDL BDL BDL BDL

19 Organic Crabon % 1.7 1.5 1.8 2.1

Texture

Sand % 21.0 18.0 22.0 18.0

Silt % 37.0 36.0 42.0 38.0

Clay % 34.0 46.0 36.0 44.0

3.5 Water Resources And Water Quality

3.5.1 Water Resources

Water resources of the study area are classified into the following categories:

Surface Water Resource: Nadi, nullah, ponds, etc.

Ground Water Resources: Accumulation of water in deeper strata of ground.

The only source of recharging for surface water and ground water is from the atmospheric precipitation, which is in the form of rainfall.

3.5.2 Surface Water Resources

Kosi river is flowing through study area and near the project site. Most of the natural drainage carries runoff during monsoon months. No other water bodies exist in the project study area.

3.5.3 Ground Water Resources

As per dynamic ground water resource of Rampur district, the net annual ground water availability is 88,848.97 ham (Table-2). The existing gross ground water draft is 68,409.82 ham & the stage of ground water development is 77%. One block Chamrana is over exploited with stage of ground water development 113%. All other blocks are in safe category, but the stage of development varies from 57.13 to 89.68%..



3.5.4 Ground and Surface Water Quality

The quality of ground and surface water is influenced by surface and sub-surface environmental conditions. The quantity and quality of water entering the underground regime is another important parameter which influences underground water quality.

Water Sampling Locations

Water quality in the study area has been studied for assessing the water environment and to evaluate anticipated impacts of the project. Based on the reconnaissance survey, sampling locations were finalized keeping the following criteria as basis:

Drainage pattern;

Location of residential areas representing different activities/likely impact areas; and

Likely areas which can represent baseline conditions For assessing the ground water quality in the study area, water samples were collected from five ground water locations from Project site, Semra Larpur, Shikarpur, Mundia Kalan, Bhada and Chankpur and analyzed as per the procedures specified in 'Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater' published by American Public Health Association (APHA). One surface water sample were also collected from Yamuna River & Sengar River near in the study area. The ground and surface water sampling locations are shown in Figure 3.7. Ground water samples for chemical analysis were collected in polyethylene carboys. Water samples collected for metal content were acidified with 1 ml HNO3. Selected physico-chemical and heavy metal have been analyzed for ground water quality status in the study area.

Figure 3.7: Ground & Surface Water Sampling Locations in the Study Area



A. Characteristics of Ground Water Samples

The collected water samples were analyzed for physical and chemical parameters as parameters described in IS:10500:2012. Table 3.3 gives desirable and permissible limits prescribed for potable water in IS: 10500: 2012.

Table 3.4: Indian Standard Specification for Drinking Water

Sl. No.

Characteristic Requirement (Acceptable

Limit)

Permissible Limit in the Absence of Alternate

Source

Protocol

I Organoleptic and Physical Parameters

i) Colour, Hazen units, Max 5 15 IS 3025 (Part 4)

ii) Odour Agreeable Agreeable IS 3025 (Part 5a)

iii) pH value 6.5-8.5 No relaxation IS 3025 (Part 11)

iv) Taste Agreeable Agreeable IS 3025 (Part 7&8)

v) Turbidity, NTU, Max 1 5 IS 3025 (Part 10)

vi) Total dissolved solids, mg/l, Max

500 2000 IS 3025 (Part 16)

II General Parameters Concerning Substances Undesirable in Excessive Amounts

i) Aluminium (as Al), mg/l, Max 0.03 0.2 IS 3025 (Part 55)

ii) Ammonia (as total ammonia-N), mg/l, Max

0.5 No relaxation IS 3025 (Part 34)

iii) Anionic detergents (as MBAS) mg/l, Max

0.2 1.0 IS 13428

iv) Barium (as Ba), mg/l, Max 0.7 No relaxation IS 15302

v) Boron (as B), mg/l, Max 0.5 1.0 IS 3025 (Part 57)

vi) Calcium (as Ca), mg/l, Max 75 200 IS 3025 (Part 40)

vii) Chloramines (as Cl2), mg/l, Max

4.0 No relaxation IS IS 3025 (Part 26)

viii) Chloride (as Cl), mg/l, Max 250 1000 IS 3025 (Part 32)

ix) Copper (as Cu), mg/l, Max 0.05 1.5 IS 3025 (Part 42)

x) Fluoride (as F) mg/l, Max 1.0 1.5 IS 3025 (Part 60)

xi) Free residual chlorine, mg/l, Min

0.2 1 IS 3025 (Part 26)

xii) Iron (as Fe), mg/l, Max 0.3 No relaxation IS 3025 (Part 53)

xiii) Magnesium (as Mg), mg/l, Max

30 100 IS 3025 (Part 46)

xiv) Manganese (as Mn), mg/l, Max

0.1 0.3 IS 3025 (Part 59)

xv) Mineral oil, mg/l, Max 0.5 No relaxation IS 3025 (Part 39)

xvi) Nitrate (as NO3), mg/l, Max 45 No relaxation IS 3025 (Part 34)

xvii) Phenolic compounds (as C6H5OH), mg/l, Max

0.001 0.002 IS 3025 (Part 43)

xviii) Selenium (as Se), mg/l, Max 0.01 No relaxation IS 3025 (Part 56)

xix) Silver (as Ag), mg/l, Max 0.1 No relaxation IS 13428

xx) Sulphate (as SO4) mg/l, Max 200 400 IS 3025 (Part 24)

xxi) Sulphide (as H2S), mg/l, Max 0.05 No relaxation IS 3025 (Part 29)

xxii) Total alkalinity as Calcium, mg/l, Max

200 600 IS 3025 (Part 23)

xxiii) Total hardness (as CaCO3), mg/l, Max

200 600 IS 3025 (Part 21)



Sl. No.

Characteristic Requirement (Acceptable

Limit)

Permissible Limit in the Absence of Alternate

Source

Protocol

xxiv) Zinc (as Zn), mg/l, Max 5 15 IS 3025 (Part 49)

III Parameters Concerning Toxic Substances

i) Cadmium (as Cd), mg/l, Max 0.003 No relaxation IS 3025 (Part 41)

ii) Cyanide (as CN), mg/l, Max 0.05 No relaxation IS 3025 (Part 27)

iii) Lead (as Pb), mg/l, Max 0.01 No relaxation IS 3025 (Part 47)

iv) Mercury (as Hg), mg/l, Max 0.001 No relaxation IS 3025 (Part 48)

v) Molybdenum (as Mo), mg/l, Max

0.07 No relaxation IS 3025 (Part 2)

vi) Nickel (as Ni), mg/l, Max 0.02 No relaxation IS 3025 (Part 54)

vii) Polychlorinated biphenyls, mg/l, Max

0.0005 viii) No relaxation

APHA 6630

viii) Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (as PAH), mg/l, Max

0.0001 No relaxation APHA 6630

ix) Total Arsenic (as As), mg/l, Max

0.01 0.05 IS 3025 (Part 37)

x) Total chromium (as Cr), mg/l, Max

0.05 No relaxation IS 3025 (Part 52

xi) Trihalomethanes

a) Bromoform, mg/l, Max 0.1 No relaxation ASTM D 3973-85 or APHA 6232

b) Dibromochloromethane, mg/l, Max

0.1 No relaxation ASTM D 3973-85 or APHA 6232

c) Bromodichloromethane, mg/l, Max

0.06 No relaxation

ASTM D 3973-85 or APHA 6232

d) Chloroform, mg/l, Max 0.2 No relaxation ASTM D 3973-85 or APHA 6232

IV Bacteriological Quality of Drinking Water

i All water intended for drinking, a) E. coli or thermotolerant coliform bacteria (TCB)

Shall not be detectable in any 100 ml sample

Source: Bureau of Indian Standard Code IS: 10500:2012. The results of ground water analysis are given in Table 3.4. Colour: The colour of ground water sample is found <1 hazen unit. Odour: The odour of ground water sample is agreeable and meets the desirable limit for drinking water standard. pH: The pH value of ground water water sample is 6.9 to 7.4 and always meets the drinking water desirable standard. Total Dissolved Solids (TDS): TDS of ground water is 210.5 to 302.0 mg/L. Total Hardness: Total hardness value ground water sample is 148.5 to 314.0 mg/L.



Iron: The iron content in ground water sample is 0.3 to 0.25 mg/L and found within the permissible limit of 0.3 mg/l in the absence of alternate source of potable water. Chloride: Chloride content of ground water sample is 8.20 to 20.4 mg/L and meets the acceptable limit of 250 mg/l. Calcium: Calcium content in ground water 42.6 to 72.5 mg/L and found within the acceptable limit of 75 mg/L. Magnesium: Magnesium content in ground water sample is 9.88 to 22.3 mg/L and found within the acceptable limit of 75 mg/L. Sulphate: Sulphate content in ground water river water sample is 18.7 to 31.7 mg/l and meets the acceptable limit of 200 mg/L for potable water. Nitrate: Nitrate content in ground water is 11.30 to 28.42 mg/L and meets the acceptable limit of 45 mg/l for potable water. Fluoride: Fluoride content of water sample is 0.22 to 0.36 mg/L and meets the acceptable limit of 1 mg/L for potable water. Conclusions: The results of ground water were compared to Indian Standard Specification of drinking water IS: 10500:2012.



Table 3.5: Ground Water Quality in the Study Area Sn. Parameters Units Project Site Semra larpur Shikarpur Mundia Kalan Chanakpur

1 pH - 7.3 7.4 7.1 7.5 7.2

2 Colour Hazen Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable

3 Turbidity NTU BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL

4 Conductivity μs/cm 298.5 320.0 380.4 382.4 297.0

5 Odour - Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable

6 Taste - Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable

7 Hardness as CaCO3 mg/L 148.5 152.0 218.23 314.0 168.2

8 Calcium as Ca mg/L 42.6 57.2 49.8 67.4 72.5

9 Total Alkalinity as CaCO3 mg/L 173.2 162.5 180.7 178.2 150.0

10 Chloride as Cl mg/L 12.6 15.9 20.4 20.12 9.30

11 Cyanide as CN mg/L BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL

12 Magnesium as Mg mg/L 13.8 16.5 14.8 9.88 12.48

13 TDS mg/L 230.0 288.0 302.0 276.5 263.5

14 Sulphate as SO4 mg/L 20.5 15.5 28.42 27.63 24.20

15 Fluoride as F mg/L 0.33 0.23 0.36 0.22 0.32

16 Nitrate as NO3-N mg/L 1.24 1.46 1.32 0.65 2.14

17 Iron as Fe mg/L 0.25 0.17 0.19 0.3 0.23

18 Chromium asCr+6 mg/L BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL

19 Zinc as Zn mg/L 0.13 0.16 0.12 0.08 0.11

20 Chromium as Cr mg/L BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL

21 Copper as Cu mg/L BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL

22 Manganese as Mn mg/L BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL

23 Cadmium as Cd mg/L BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL

24 Lead as Pb mg/L BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL

25 Arsenic as As mg/L BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL

26 Mercury as Hg mg/L BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL

27 Sodium as Na mg/L 14.70 17.52 17.80 12.5 18.60

28 Potassium as k mg/L 1.35 2.30 1.10 1.12 1.90

29 Phosphate asPO4 mg/L BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL

30 Nickel as Ni mg/L BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL

Note: BDL indicates Below Detection Limit.



B. Characteristics of Surface Water Samples

The surface water sample was collected from Krishna River and analyzed for physical and chemical parameters. Table 3.5 gives analyzed results for Krishna River and discussed below: Colour: The colour of surface water sample is found <1 hazen unit. Odour: The odour of surface water sample is agreeable and meets the desirable limit for drinking water standard. pH: The pH value of surface water samples was between 7.7 - 7.9 and always meets the drinking water desirable standard. Total Dissolved Solids (TDS): TDS of surface water samples was between 205 - 325 mg/l and meets permissible limit of 500 mg/l. Total Hardness: Total hardness value of surface water samples was between is 71.9 - 92 mg/l Hardness value is within the acceptable limit of 200 mg/l. Iron: The iron content in surface water samples was between is 0.12 – 0.18 mg/l and found within the permissible limit of 0.3 mg/l in the absence of alternate source of potable water. Chloride: Chloride content of surface water samples was between is 30 -38 mg/l and meets the acceptable limit of 250 mg/l. Calcium: Calcium content in surface water samples was between is 18.7 - 18.8 mg/l and found within the acceptable limit of 75 mg/l. Magnesium: Magnesium content in surface water samples was between is 4.4 – 6.4 mg/l and found within the acceptable limit of 75 mg/l. Total Alkalinity: Total alkalinity of surface water samples was between is 101 - 102 mg/l and meets within the permissible limit 600 mg/l. Sulphate: Sulphate content in surface water samples was between is 23.5 - 28 mg/l and meets the acceptable limit of 200 mg/l for potable water. Nitrate: Nitrate content in surface water samples was between is 0.78 – 2.2 mg/l and meets the acceptable limit of 45 mg/l for potable water. Fluoride: Fluoride content of surface water samples was between is 0.14 – 0.29 mg/l and meets the acceptable limit of 1 mg/l for potable water.



Table 3.6: Analysis Results of Surface water samples.

Sn. Parameters Unit Rampur Dhamman

Nr. Kosi river

(SW2)

Kosi River (SW1)

Kosi Nadi (SW3)

1 Colour Hazan <1 <1 <1

2 Turbidity NTU 6 5 6

3 pH -- 7.8 7.9 7.7

4 DO mg/L 6.5 6.1 6.5

5 BOD mg/L 5.6 4.31 6.0

6 COD mg/L 29.5 17.3 30

7 Total Dissolved Solids

mg/L 320 205 325

8 Total Hardness mg/L 90.5 71.9 92

9 Iron (Fe) mg/L 0.16 0.12 0.18

10 Chloride (Cl) mg/L 35.4 30 38

11 Calcium (Ca) mg/L 18.8 18.7 18.8

12 Magnesium (Mg) mg/L 6.4 4.4 6.4

13 Copper (Cu) mg/L 0.05 0.13 0.05

14 Manganese (Mn) mg/L 0.02 0.02 0.02

15 Sulphate (SO4) mg/L 27.5 23.5 28.0

16 Nitrate (NO3) mg/L 1.0 0.78 2.2

17 Fluoride (F) mg/L 0.24 0.14 0.29

18 Phenolic Compounds

mg/L BDL BDL BDL

19 Mercury (Hg) mg/L BDL BDL BDL

20 Cadmium (Cd) mg/L BDL BDL BDL

21 Selenium (Se) mg/L BDL BDL BDL

22 Arsenic (As) mg/L BDL BDL BDL

23 Cyanide (CN) mg/L BDL BDL BDL

24 Lead (Pb) mg/L BDL BDL BDL

25 Zinc (Zn) mg/L 1.4 0.24 1.4

26 Anionic Detergents

mg/L BDL BDL BDL

27 Hexa. Chromium (Cr+6)

mg/L BDL BDL BDL

28 Mineral Oil mg/L BDL BDL BDL

29 Pesticides mg/L BDL BDL BDL

30 Alkalinity as CaCo3

mg/L 101 82.2 102

31 Aluminum (as Al) mg/L BDL BDL BDL

32 Boron mg/L 0.08 0.07 0.08



3.6 Climatology and Meteorology

3.6.1 Introduction

The meteorological parameters play a vital role in transport and diffusion of pollutants in the atmosphere. The collection and analysis of meteorological data, therefore, is an essential component of environmental impact assessment studies. The long term and short term impact assessment could be made through utilization and interpretation of meteorological data collected over long and short periods, respectively.

3.6.2 Climatology

Climatological (long-term) data is obtained from the closest Indian Meteorology Department (IMD) station or from any other nearby station, which has been collecting meteorological data for more than ten years. Climatological data for the site was obtained

3.6.3 Climatological Data

Seasons From Bareilly climatological data, it can be said that the area has four seasons as follows:

Summer : March to Mid June Monsoon : Mid June to September Post-monsoon : October to November Winter : December to February

The meteorological and climatological data collected from India Meteorological Department (IMD) from Bareilly IMD Station has been considered for the study, which is located at aerial distance of 90 km. Rainfall The average annual rainfall of the district is 967 mm. About 85% of the rainfall is received during June to September. Temperature May is the hottest month of the year with mean daily maximum temperature at about 46°C and mean daily minimum temperature about 40°C. With the advance of the southwest monsoon the day temperature drops appreciably but the night continue to be warm. January is the coldest month with the mean daily maximum temperature at 21°C and mean daily minimum temperature about 8°C. The mean monthly maximum temperature is 29.4°C and mean monthly minimum temperature is 12°C. Relative Humidity The mean monthly morning relative humidity is 69% and the mean monthly evening relative humidity 51%.



Wind Direction The winds flows most frequently from west (W), followed by the wind from the east (E) and northwest (NW). The frequency of winds from west (W), east (E) and northwest (NW) are 28%, 12% and 8% respectively, however the winds are calms on 37 % during the study period. The winds are rarely flow from south southeast (SSE), south southwest (SSW) directions. Wind Speed: Wind are generally light, the mean wind velocity is 5-1 kph. The potential evapo-transpiration rate is 1,402.8 mm.

3.6.4 Micro Meteorological Data for the Site

Micrometeorology data changes after a few kilometres due to changes in local topography. Thus, IMD data for the Bareilly may not be precisely applicable to the site of Pattikalan IOCL plant which is located at a distance of nearly 90 km. Furthermore, IMD data recorded only at 8:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. for only eight wind directions with wind speeds over widely spaced ranges is not of much use in dispersion modelling. Because of these limitations, micrometeorological data was collected near site round the clock. The meteorological data, such as, wind speed and direction, ambient temperature, and relative humidity was collected near the IOCL plant at Bareilly and is presented in Table 3.10 for post monsoon season. Table 3.7: Summary of Micro meteorological Conditions near the site

Parameter Post Monsoon Season

Temperature Max (oC) Min (oC)

46 8

Relative Humidity Max (%) Min (%)

69 51

Wind Speed Max (kmph) Min (kmph) Mean (kmph)

4.5 1.0 2.5

Calm Period (%) 37

Predominant Wind Direction From west to east.

3.7 Ambient Air Quality

3.7.1 Introduction

To study the baseline air quality scenario in the study area, eight ambient air quality monitoring (AAQM) stations were selected in the study area in different directions and at



different distances from the project site keeping in view of the guidelines of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MOEF&CC).

3.7.2 Methodology of Monitoring and Analysis

Envirotech APM 460 BL Respirable Dust Sampler (RDS) and Sampler (Envirotech APM 550)/ Ecotech (AAS 127) fine particulate matter were deployed for ambient air quality monitoring. The baseline data of air environment is monitored for the below mentioned parameters:

Particulate Matter (PM2.5);

Particulate Matter (PM10);

Sulphur dioxide (SO2);

Di oxides of Nitrogen (NO2);

Ozone (O3);

Lead (Pb);

Carbon Monoxide (CO);

Ammonia (NH3);

Benzene (C6H6);

Benzo (a) Pyrene (BaP);

Arsenic (As);

Nickel (Ni),

3.7.3 Sampling and Analytical Techniques

PM2.5 and PM10 have been estimated by gravimetric method. Modified West and Gaeke method (IS-5182 part-II, 1969) have been adopted for estimation of SO2. Jacobs-Hochheiser method (IS-5182 part-IV, 1975) has been adopted for the estimation of NO2. Samples for carbon monoxide were analyzed using NDIR techniques. The techniques adopted for sampling and analysis are given in Table 3.11 along with the minimum detection limits for each parameter. Table 3.8: Techniques Used For Ambient Air Quality Monitoring

S. No.

Parameter Technique Detectable Limit (µg / m3)

1 Particulate Matter (PM10)

Gravimetric [EPA -40 (CFR Part 50)] 2.0

2 Particulate Matter (PM2.5)

Gravimetric [EPA -40 (CFR Part 50)] 2.0



S. No.

Parameter Technique Detectable Limit (µg / m3)

3 Sulphur Dioxide (SO2) Improved West and Gaeke 5.0

4 Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) Modified Jacob & Hochheiser 5.0

5 Carbon Monoxide (CO) NDIR [IS 13270 : 1992] 0.1

6 Ammonia (NH3) Nesslers Method (APHA) 20

7 Ozone (O3) KI Absorption Method 5.0

8 Lead (Pb) AAS Method [IS 5182 (Part 22) : 2004]

0.1

9 Arsenic (As) AAS Method [IS 5182 (Part 22) : 2004]

0.001

10 Nickel (Ni) AAS Method [IS 5182 (Part 22) : 2004]

0.001

11 Benzone (C6H6) Adsorption & Desorption followed by GC [IS 5182 (Part 11) : 2006]

0.01

12 Benzo (a) pyrene (BaP) Solvent Extraction followed by GC Analysis [IS 5282 (Part 12) : 1991]

0.00

3.7.4 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Locations

The Project site, Pipalia, Dabhaumustahkhan, Mandia Guljari, Semra Lapur, Shikarpur, Mundia kalan and Chanakpur villages were selected for ambient air quality monitoring based as per guidelines of CPCB. Ambient air quality monitoring locations are shown in Figure 3.11.

Figure 3.8: Ambient Air and Noise Quality Locations



Table 3.9: Air, Noise Sampling Location in the Study Area

3.7.4 National Ambient Air Quality Standards

The national ambient air quality standards are given in Table 3.12. Monitored values for study have been compared with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards.

3.7.5 Results of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring

The results of monitoring of PM2.5, PM10, SO2, NO2, NH3, O3, C6H6, BaP, Pb, As, Ni and CO concentrations at The project site, Shekhupur Jakhauli, Mugalpur Nraini, Reetor, Hariharpur, Kankarpur, Bhada Mai and Baisoli Ghat villages during the post-monsoon season are presented in Table 3.13 to Table 3.18.

3.7.4 Ambient Air Quality Standards

National ambient air quality standards are given in Table 3.13. National ambient air quality standards for industrial, residential, rural & other areas are met for all monitored parameters at all AAQM locations during post monsoon season.

Table 3.10: National Ambient Air Quality Standards

S.No

Pollutant Time Weighted Average

Concentration in Ambient Air

Industrial Residential, Rural & Other Areas

Ecologically Sensitive Area (Notified by Central Government)

Sr. No.

Sampling Location Code & Name

IOCL, Pattikalan

Direction Dist. (Km) from project site

Latitude Longitude

1 *A1 Premises of project site

- - 29.154108° 79.044301°

2 A2 Pipalia ENE 2.97 km 29.157598° 79.074498°

3 A3 Dabhaumustahkhan WSW 3.21 km 29.146246° 79.012567°

4 A4 Mandia Guljari NE 3.78 km 29.180586° 79.068535°

5 A5 Semra Larpur SSE 2.58 km 29.122954° 79.058935°

6 A6 Shikarpur ESE 6.06 km 29.117378° 79.111016°

7 A7 Mundia Kalan E 8.85 km 29.153908° 79.135147°

8 A8 Chanakpur WNW 7.09 km 29.169697° 78.974157°



S.No

Pollutant Time Weighted Average

Concentration in Ambient Air

Industrial Residential, Rural & Other Areas

Ecologically Sensitive Area (Notified by Central Government)

1. Sulphur dioxide (SO2)(g/m3) Annual Average*

50 20

24 Hours** 80 80

2. Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx)

(g/m3)

Annual Average*

40 30

24 Hours** 80 80

3. Particulate Matter (Size Less

Then 10 m) or PM10 (g/m3)

Annual Average*

60 60

24 Hours** 100 100

4. Particulate Matter (Size Less

Then 2.5 m) or PM2.5

(g/m3)

Annual Average*

40 40

24 Hours** 60 60

5. Ozone O3 (g/m3) 8 Hours* 100 100

1 Hours** 80 80

6. Lead (Pb) (g/m3) Annual Average*

0.5 0.5

24 Hours** 1.0 1.0

7. Carbon monoxide (CO) (mg/m3)

Annual Average*

2 2

24 Hours** 4 4

8. Ammonia (NH3) (g/m3) Annual Average*

100 100

24 Hours** 400 400

9. Benzene (C6H6) (g/m3) Annual* 5 5

10.

Benzo (a) Pyrane (BaP) particulate phase only (ng/m3)

Annual* 1 1

11.

Arsenic (As) (ng/m3) Annual* 6 6

12.

Nickel (Ni) (ng/m3) Annual* 20 20

Note: * Annual arithmetic mean of minimum 104 measurements in a year taken twice a week 24 hourly at uniform interval. ** 24 hourly /8 hourly values should be met 98% of the time in a year. However 2% of the time, it may exceed but not on one consecutive days.



3.10.5 Results

Various parameters like maximum, minimum and average have been computed from the monitored data for all the locations and summary of ambient air quality test results are presented in Tables 3.9.



Table 3.11 : Ambient Air Quality at Project Site (AAQM 1)

S. No.

Date PM2.5 PM10 SO2 NO2 CO NH3 O3 Lead Benzene Bap As Ni

µg/m3 µg/m3 µg/m3 µg/m3 µg/m3 µg/m3 µg/m3 µg/m3 µg/m3 ng/m3 ng/m3 ng/m3

1 02.12.2017 25.2 44.7 8.1 10.2 1.3 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

2 03.12.2017 25.3 48.3 9.2 9.8 0.8 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

3 09.12.2017 28.9 42.6 8.5 9.6 1.4 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

4 10.12.2017 26.3 44.9 9.9 10.2 1.9 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

5 16.12.2017 30.2 48.8 10.3 11.5 1.4 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

6 17.12.2017 32.5 50.3 9.8 10.9 0.9 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

7 23.12.2017 31.3 50.1 8.9 11.2 1.7 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

8 24.12.2017 33.8 50.7 7.8 9.8 2.1 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

9 30.12.2017 35.7 53.9 9.6 10.3 2.6 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

10 31.12.2017 36.8 54.2 10.4 11.7 0.8 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

11 06.01.2017 33.4 56.4 10.7 12.3 1.5 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

12 07.01.2017 38.2 59.3 10.2 12.7 2.3 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

13 13.01.2017 35.4 57.5 9.5 12.1 2.5 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

14 14.01.2017 32.7 50.6 7.5 10.4 2.6 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

15 20.01.2017 35.2 56.3 8.4 11.8 1.8 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

16 21.01.2017 37.8 58.4 9.7 11.6 1.9 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

17 27.01.2017 38.4 60.2 10.2 12.3 2.1 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

18 28.01.2017 36.7 59.4 10.8 13.2 0.9 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

19 03.02.2017 35.7 54.7 11.2 13.8 2.3 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

20 04.02.2017 30.8 49.6 11.8 14.5 1.8 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

21 10.02.2017 34.7 51.8 12.2 15.3 2.2 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

22 11.02.2017 39.5 55.1 11.6 15.8 1.9 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

23 17.02.2017 36.7 56.2 12.4 14.6 2.6 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

24 18.02.2017 35.2 54.8 12.6 15.5 2.8 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

25 24.02.2017 35.3 54.2 11.1 13.4 2.1 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

26 25.02.2017 35.1 53.6 9.5 10.2 2.0 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

Maximum 39.5 60.2 12.6 15.8 2.8 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

Minimum 25.3 42.6 7.5 9.6 0.8 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

Average 33.63 52.89 10.08 12.17 1.83 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

98 %tile 38.99 59.83 12.50 15.62 2.70 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0



Table 3.12 : Ambient Air Quality at Pipalia (AAQM2)

S.No Date PM 2.5 PM10 SO2 NO2 CO NH3 O3 Lead Benzene BAP As Ni

µg/m3 µg/m

3 µg/m3 µg/m

3 mg/m

3 µg/m

3 µg/m

3 µg/m

3 µg/m

3 ng/m

3 ng/m

3 ng/m

3

1. 02.12.2017 28.6 48.6 7.8 10.6 0.57 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

2. 03.12.2017 28.9 50.2 7.5 11.3 0.92 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

3. 09.12.2017 27.3 50.5 8.6 11.5 1.3 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

4. 10.12.2017 26.5 52.4 9.2 10.8 2.2 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

5. 16.12.2017 28.6 49.8 7.6 12.3 0.48 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

6. 17.12.2017 26.8 53.7 10.2 11.9 0.72 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

7. 23.12.2017 31.8 55.6 8.3 12.8 1.8 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

8. 24.12.2017 29.2 54.2 7.9 12.6 2.3 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

9. 30.12.2017 28.8 57.3 10.7 13.2 2.5 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

10. 31.12.2017 29.6 53.4 11.4 14.7 2.4 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

11. 06.01.2017 27.4 49.8 10.9 14.8 1.9 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

12. 07.01.2017 27.8 48.5 9.8 15.2 2.6 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

13. 13.01.2017 30.2 54.2 10.2 13.8 2.8 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

14. 14.01.2017 32.4 54.9 10.5 13.2 2.4 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

15. 20.01.2017 31.4 58.3 11.8 14.5 1.6 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

16. 21.01.2017 33.2 59.4 8.9 15.2 1.8 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

17. 27.01.2017 31.6 55.8 9.4 13.8 2 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

18. 28.01.2017 30.4 54.3 11.2 14.9 2.3 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

19. 03.02.2017 32.2 52.4 11.8 15.8 1.8 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

20. 04.02.2017 35.8 49.7 10.9 16.2 0.83 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

21. 10.02.2017 38.5 53.4 10.6 12.8 2.4 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

22. 11.02.2017 40.3 60.2 12.3 16.3 2.6 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

23. 17.02.2017 41.2 60.7 10.8 14.2 2.4 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

24. 18.02.2017 42.8 59.8 11.3 13.9 1.8 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

25. 24.02.2017 40.1 60.0 10.2 14.3 2.1 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

26. 25.02.2017 41.4 58.2 9.4 13.2 2.2 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

Maximum 42.8 60.7 12.3 16.3 2.8 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

Minimum 26.5 48.5 7.5 10.6 0.48 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

Average 31.95 54.09 9.98 13.58 1.83 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

98 %tile 42.06 60.47 12.07 16.25 2.70 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0



Table 3.13 : Ambient Air Quality at Dabhaura Mustahkam (AAQM3)


µg/m

3 µg/m

3 µg/m3 µg/m

3 mg/m

3 µg/m

3 µg/m

3 µg/m

3 µg/m

3 ng/m

3 ng/m

3 ng/m

3

1 02.12.2017 26.2 45.7 8.8 10.2 1.3 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

2 03.12.2017 25.3 48.3 9.2 9.8 0.8 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

3 09.12.2017 28.9 42.6 8.5 9.6 1.4 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

4 10.12.2017 26.3 44.9 9.9 10.2 1.9 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

5 16.12.2017 30.2 48.8 10.3 11.5 1.4 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

6 17.12.2017 32.5 50.3 9.8 10.9 0.9 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

7 23.12.2017 33.4 52.6 8.9 11.2 1.7 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

8 24.12.2017 33.8 50.7 7.8 9.8 2.1 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

9 30.12.2017 35.7 53.9 9.6 10.3 2.6 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

10 31.12.2017 36.8 54.2 10.4 11.7 0.8 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

11 06.01.2017 33.4 56.4 10.7 12.3 1.5 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

12 07.01.2017 38.2 59.3 10.2 12.7 2.3 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

13 13.01.2017 35.4 57.5 9.5 12.1 2.5 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

14 14.01.2017 32.7 50.6 7.5 10.4 2.6 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

15 20.01.2017 35.2 56.3 8.4 11.8 1.8 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

16 21.01.2017 37.8 58.4 9.7 11.6 1.9 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

17 27.01.2017 38.4 60.2 10.2 12.3 2.1 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

18 28.01.2017 36.7 59.4 10.8 13.2 0.9 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

19 03.02.2017 35.7 54.7 11.2 13.8 2.3 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

20 04.02.2017 30.8 49.6 11.8 14.5 1.8 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

21 10.02.2017 34.7 51.8 12.2 15.3 2.2 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

22 11.02.2017 39.5 55.1 11.6 15.8 1.9 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

23 17.02.2017 36.7 56.2 12.4 14.6 2.6 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

24 18.02.2017 35.2 54.8 12.6 15.5 2.8 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

25 24.02.2017 32.1 50.5 10.8 11.9 0.9 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

26 25.02.2017 33.4 52.6 11.9 10.2 0.7 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

Maximum 39.5 60.2 12.6 15.8 2.8 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

Minimum 25.3 42.6 7.5 9.6 0.8 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

Average 33.63 52.89 10.08 12.17 1.83 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

98 %tile 38.99 59.832 12.50 15.62 2.70 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0



Table 3.14: Ambient Air Quality at Mandia Guljari (AAQM4)


µg/m3 µg/m

3 µg/m3 µg/m

3 mg/m

3 µg/m

3 µg/m

3 µg/m

3 µg/m

3 ng/m

3 ng/m

3 ng/m

3

1 30.11.2017 28.5 45.2 9.2 13.3 1.8 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

2 01.12.2017 29.2 49.3 9.5 13.9 1.5 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

3 07.12.2017 28.9 44.6 8.3 12.4 0.9 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

4 08.12.2017 29.4 50.2 8.8 14.6 1.6 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

5 14.12.2017 30.2 53.4 9.8 14.8 2.2 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

6 15.12.2017 33.4 55.7 10.2 15.3 1.8 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

7 21.12.2017 35.2 56.8 11.4 15.8 2 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

8 22.12.2017 34.4 55.9 11.1 16.2 2.3 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

9 28.12.2017 35.7 56.6 12.3 15.9 2.1 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

10 29.12.2017 36.8 57.2 12.5 16.7 1.9 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

11 04.01.2017 37.3 58.7 11.9 15.6 0.8 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

12 05.01.2017 37.9 57.3 11.5 16.2 1.7 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

13 11.01.2017 35.4 56.2 10.9 17.2 2.6 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

14 12.01.2017 32.7 54.4 9.6 14.6 2.1 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

15 18.01.2017 35.2 56.4 9.8 15.2 2 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

16 19.01.2017 37.8 58.7 11.7 16.5 1.9 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

17 25.01.2017 38.4 60.2 12.6 17.6 2.6 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

18 26.01.2017 36.7 59.4 12.2 17.7 2.8 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

19 01.02.2017 35.7 56.7 11.8 16.7 1.9 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

20 02.02.2017 30.8 52.5 9.7 13.6 1.4 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

21 08.02.2017 34.7 54.9 10.3 14.8 1.9 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

22 09.02.2017 39.5 61.1 12.8 18 2.6 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

23 15.02.2017 36.7 58.8 12 17.8 1.8 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

24 16.02.2017 35.2 56.4 11.6 16.5 2 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

25 22.02.2017 30.4 55.4 9.4 13.5 2.2 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

26 23.02.2017 29.7 52.6 10 12.2 1.6 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

Maximum 39.5 61.1 12.8 18 2.8 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

Minimum 28.5 44.6 8.3 12.4 0.8 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

Average 34.37 55.09 10.87 15.67 1.92 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

98 %tile 38.99 60.68 12.70 17.90 2.70 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0



Table 3.15 : Ambient Air Quality at Semra Larpur (AAQM5) S.No Date PM 2.5 PM10 SO2 NO2 CO NH3 O3 Lead Benzene BAP As Ni

µg/m3 µg/m

3 µg/m3 µg/m

3 mg/m

3 µg/m

3 µg/m

3 µg/m

3 µg/m

3 ng/m

3 ng/m

3 ng/m

3

1 30.11.2017 30.2 49.6 8.3 12.7 1.5 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

2 01.12.2017 32.4 50.3 8.9 14.3 1.6 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

3 07.12.2017 29.3 48.7 9.3 13.5 0.9 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

4 08.12.2017 28.8 47.6 9.2 13.9 1.5 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

5 14.12.2017 30.4 50.4 10.5 15.3 1.9 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

6 15.12.2017 33.7 52.6 10.7 14.8 2.2 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

7 21.12.2017 34.3 56.2 12.2 16.3 2.5 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

8 22.12.2017 36.7 57.1 12.8 16.9 2.8 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

9 28.12.2017 38.2 55.8 11.6 15.5 1.9 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

10 29.12.2017 38.9 56.7 12.5 15.8 2.3 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

11 04.01.2017 40.5 60.2 13.3 17.5 2.9 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

12 05.01.2017 39.8 58.8 12.9 16.9 3.2 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

13 11.01.2017 42.3 58 12.7 16.4 3.1 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

14 12.01.2017 44.6 60.5 13.6 18.8 2.8 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

15 18.01.2017 36.7 57.3 13.3 18.6 2.7 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

16 19.01.2017 35.8 54.8 12.4 17.6 1.8 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

17 25.01.2017 30.3 52.9 11.9 16.5 1.2 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

18 26.01.2017 29.8 49.6 10.7 15.3 0.9 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

19 01.02.2017 28.3 50.2 10.8 15.6 1.6 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

20 02.02.2017 32.4 53.4 11.3 16.3 1.6 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

21 08.02.2017 38.9 57.4 11.8 16.4 2.1 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

22 09.02.2017 42.2 63.5 13.8 18.5 2 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

23 15.02.2017 44.5 64.4 14.2 18.9 2.6 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

24 16.02.2017 43.8 62.7 14 17.6 2.8 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

25 22.02.2017 43.3 61.1 12.4 16.8 1.9 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

26 23.02.2017 42 62.7 9.7 14.4 2.0 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

Maximum 44.6 64.4 14.2 18.9 3.2 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

Minimum 28.3 47.6 8.3 12.7 0.9 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

Average 35.99 55.41 11.74 16.21 2.10 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

98 %tile 44.55 63.98 14.10 18.85 3.15 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0



Table 3.16 : Ambient Air Quality at Shikarpur (AAQ6) S.No Date PM 2.5 PM10 SO2 NO2 CO NH3 O3 Lead Benzene BAP As Ni

µg/m3 µg/m

3 µg/m3 µg/m

3 mg/m

3 µg/m

3 µg/m

3 µg/m

3 µg/m

3 ng/m

3 ng/m

3 ng/m

3

1 05.12.2017 25.3 46.5 6.3 11.6 0.62 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

2 06.12.2017 24.6 45.3 6.8 12.2 0.46 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

3 12.12.2017 26.8 44.8 7.2 13.4 1.3 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

4 13.12.2017 28.4 48.2 7.9 14.2 1.5 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

5 19.12.2017 27.3 47.5 6.5 11.2 1.8 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

6 20.12.2017 26.7 45.7 7.1 13.2 2 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

7 26.12.2017 29.6 49.3 7.8 13.7 0.84 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

8 27.12.2017 30.2 50.2 8.3 14.2 2.3 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

9 02.01.2017 32.4 52.6 8.6 15.2 2.4 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

10 03.01.2017 30.5 53.4 9.2 16.3 1.8 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

11 09.01.2017 34.5 56.7 8.2 14.2 0.92 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

12 10.01.2017 35.3 57.2 7.9 13.5 0.86 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

13 16.01.2017 32.4 54.6 8.6 13.8 1.5 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

14 17.01.2017 30.8 52.9 9.2 14.2 2 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

15 23.01.2017 29.4 50.1 9.5 15.4 2.3 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

16 24.01.2017 26.7 48.5 10.2 17.3 2.5 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

17 30.01.2017 33.7 54.2 11.3 17.9 2.3 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

18 31.01.2017 36.5 57.3 11.7 17.8 1.6 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

19 06.02.2017 37.4 58.4 12 18.6 1.2 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

20 07.02.2017 33.5 55.2 11.2 17.2 2.3 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

21 13.02.2017 34.6 55.8 10.9 16.2 2.7 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

22 14.02.2017 35.8 57.4 11.8 17.5 2.8 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

23 20.02.2017 30.3 52.7 10.3 16.8 2.4 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

24 21.02.2017 28.5 50.5 9.3 15.3 2 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

25 27.02.2017 32.5 50.6 8.6 10.8 0.98 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

26 28.02.2017 30.1 51.9 8.2 11.2 1.9 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

Maximum 37.4 58.4 12 18.6 2.8 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

Minimum 24.6 44.8 6.3 11.2 0.46 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

Average 30.89 51.85 9.08 15.03 1.76 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

98 %tile 36.98 57.94 11.90 18.27 2.75 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0



Table 3.17 : Ambient Air Quality at Mundia Kalan (AAQ7)


µg/m

3 µg/m

3 µg/m3 µg/m

3 mg/m

3 µg/m

3 µg/m

3 µg/m

3 µg/m

3 ng/m

3 ng/m

3 ng/m

3

1 05.12.2017 23.8 44.6 7.6 11.2 1.8 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

2 06.12.2017 24.6 46.8 8.2 12.3 2.1 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

3 12.12.2017 26.3 46.5 9.6 13.2 1.9 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

4 13.12.2017 26.7 47.8 10.6 14.3 0.9 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

5 19.12.2017 25.3 46.5 10.3 13.9 1.3 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

6 20.12.2017 25.8 46.9 11.2 14.5 1.8 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

7 26.12.2017 28.6 49.5 12.3 15.6 2.1 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

8 27.12.2017 29.3 50.2 14.8 16.3 2.6 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

9 02.01.2017 30.2 52.4 15.3 19.5 2.9 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

10 03.01.2017 28.5 50.6 14.5 18.9 3 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

11 09.01.2017 31.2 52.7 16.4 19.3 2.4 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

12 10.01.2017 32.2 53.7 17.5 18.3 2 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

13 16.01.2017 34.4 55.2 18.6 17.5 1.8 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

14 17.01.2017 33.5 54.8 17.6 15.3 0.95 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

15 23.01.2017 35.7 56.3 18.3 21.3 1.3 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

16 24.01.2017 35.6 54.8 15.5 19.4 1.7 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

17 30.01.2017 33.8 53.2 16.8 20.2 2.4 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

18 31.01.2017 34.6 55.4 14.3 19.4 2.9 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

19 06.02.2017 38.5 57.6 15.5 20.6 2.2 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

20 07.02.2017 36.2 57.9 17.3 20.8 1.5 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

21 13.02.2017 37.5 56.7 17.6 20.4 2.8 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

22 14.02.2017 34.8 55.4 13.5 18.5 3.1 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

23 20.02.2017 37.6 58.2 14.2 19.2 2.9 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

24 21.02.2017 36.7 57.2 15 20.1 2.4 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

25 27.02.2017 30.2 53.8 14.5 17.3 2.1 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

26 28.02.2017 31.4 55.3 13.6 18.5 1.8 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

Maximum 38.5 58.2 18.6 21.3 3.1 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

Minimum 23.8 44.6 7.6 11.2 0.9 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

Average 31.68 52.45 14.18 17.40 2.11 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

98 %tile 38.08 58.06 18.46 21.07 3.05 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0



Table 3.18 : Ambient Air Quality at Chanakpur (AAQ8)


µg/m

3 µg/m

3 µg/m3 µg/m

3 mg/m

3 µg/m

3 µg/m

3 µg/m

3 µg/m

3 ng/m

3 ng/m

3 ng/m

3

1 05.12.2017 28.5 48.4 8.5 12.8 1.3 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

2 06.12.2017 29.2 50.2 8.7 13.5 1.5 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

3 12.12.2017 30.6 52.6 9.2 14.7 2 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

4 13.12.2017 32.5 54.7 9.5 15.2 1.9 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

5 19.12.2017 28.4 53.6 7.3 12.2 0.95 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

6 20.12.2017 27.6 52.4 8.6 12.8 2.2 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

7 26.12.2017 30.2 53 10.5 15.2 2.4 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

8 27.12.2017 32.4 53.6 11.6 16.3 1.9 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

9 02.01.2017 26.2 47.4 10.3 17.5 0.85 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

10 03.01.2017 26.9 48 10.5 16.8 2.6 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

11 09.01.2017 27.5 47.3 10.6 17.2 2.8 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

12 10.01.2017 27.9 47.5 11.2 17.5 3 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

13 16.01.2017 29.5 50.2 11.6 18.3 3.2 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

14 17.01.2017 30.4 51.6 11.8 19.2 2.8 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

15 23.01.2017 32.7 53.6 12.6 20.2 1.8 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

16 24.01.2017 33.5 54.2 13.4 20.6 1.5 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

17 30.01.2017 35.4 56.9 14.6 19.4 0.96 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

18 31.01.2017 34.8 55.7 14 18.6 1.8 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

19 06.02.2017 36 57.1 16.7 20.8 2.2 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

20 07.02.2017 36.5 57.6 17.2 21.3 2.3 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

21 13.02.2017 35.5 58 18.2 26.4 1.9 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

22 14.02.2017 34.4 56.9 16.3 21.6 1.7 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

23 20.02.2017 30.5 52.3 14.5 20.4 2 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

24 21.02.2017 32.8 55.7 15.6 19.8 1.6 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

25 27.02.2017 27.7 45.5 11.1 12.5 2 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

26 28.02.2017 29.5 50.2 10.6 11.3 1.2 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

Maximum 36.5 58 18.2 26.4 3.2 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

Minimum 26.2 47.3 7.3 12.2 0.85 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

Average 31.25 52.84 12.25 17.96 1.97 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0

98 %tile 36.27 57.81 17.74 24.19 3.10 <5.0 <5.0 <0.1 <0.1 <0.01 <1.0 <1.0



Table 3.19: Monitoring of Hydrocarbon And VOC in the Study Area

Sn Locations VOC (PPM) Non Methane (PPM) Methane (PPM)

Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum

1. LPG Plant site 1.1 1.8 1.4 1.9 BDL

2. Pipalia BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL

3. Dabhaura Mustahkam

BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL

4. Mandia Guljari BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL

5. Semra Larpur BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL

6. Shikarpur BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL

7. Mundia Kalan BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL

8. Chanakpur BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL

The Methane Hydrocarbons and Non-Methane hydro carbons were very absent in the study area.



3.10.6 Observations

PM10: The maximum and minimum concentrations for PM10 were recorded as 64.4 µg/m3 and 42.6 µg/m3 respectively. The maximum concentration was recorded at Semra Larpur and the minimum concentration was recorded at Dabhaura Mustahkam.

PM2.5: The maximum and minimum concentrations for PM2.5 were recorded as 44.6 µg/m3 and 23.8 µg/m3 respectively. The maximum concentration was recorded at Semra Larpur and the minimum concentration was recorded at Mundia Kalan.

SO2: The maximum and minimum SO2 concentrations were recorded as 18.6 µg/m3 and 6.3 respectively. The maximum concentration was recorded at the Mundia Kalan and the minimum concentration was recorded at Shikarpur village.

NO2: The maximum and minimum NOx concentrations were recorded as 26.4 µg/m3 and 9.6 µg/m3. The maximum concentration was recorded at Dabhaura Mustahkam area and the minimum concentration was recorded at the Project Site.

TVOC: The maximum and minimum VOC concentrations were recorded as 1.8 µg/m3 and 1.1 µg/m3 respectively. The maximum concentration was recorded at Project site. The average values were observed to be in the BDL.

3.8 Ambient Noise Levels

3.8.1 Introduction

Noise can be defined as an unwanted sound. It interferes with speech and hearing and is intense enough to damage hearing or is otherwise annoying. The definition of noise as unwanted sound implies that it has an adverse effect on human beings and their environment. Noise can also disturb wildlife and ecological system.

3.8.2 Methodology

To understand the noise environment in the study area, a noise survey was conducted using Sound Level Meter 2031 manufactured by Cygnet Systems. Noise measurements were carried out at the same location where ambient air quality was monitored. The 24-hourly sound levels were measured at each location once during the study period.

3.8.3 Equivalent Sound Pressure Level (Leq)

The Leq is the equivalent continuous sound level, which is equivalent to the same sound energy as the actual fluctuating sound measured in the same period. This is necessary because sound



from noise source often fluctuates widely during a given period of time. This is calculated from the following equation:

L eq(hrly) = L50+ (L10 - L90)2/60 Also: Lday is defined as the equivalent noise level measured over a period of time during day (6 AM to 10 PM). Lnight is defined as the equivalent noise level measured over a period of time during night (10 PM to 6 AM). Hourly measurements have been carried out in day and night time at Plant site, Pipalia, Dabhaura Mustahkam, Mandia Guljari, Semra Larpur, Shikarpur, Mundia Kalan and Chanakpur locations during study period. Ambient Noise Levels monitoring locations are given in Figure 3.8. Day and night-time Leq have been calculated from hourly Leq values and compared with the stipulated standards as given in Table 3.20.

Table 3.20: Ambient Standards in Respect of Noise

Area Code Category of Area Leq. Limits in dB(A)

Day Time Night Time

A Industrial Area 75 70

B Commercial Area 65 55

C Residential Area 55 45

D Silence Zone 50 40

Note: 1. Day-time is reckoned in between 6:00 a.m and 10:00 p.m. 2. Night time is reckoned is between 10:00 p.m and 6.00 a.m. 3. Silence Zone is defined as areas upto 100 m around such premises as hospitals, educational, institutions and Courts. The Silence Zones are to be declared by the competent authority.

Table 3.21 gives the day and night-time Leq noise levels. Measured Leq noise levels are below the prescribed limit stipulated for Residential area in the study area.

Locations Category of Area Day Time dB(A) Night Time dB(A)

Project site Industrial 63.4 56.3

Pipalia Residential 49.4 42.1

Dabhaumustahkhan Residential 47.6 43.2

Mandia Guljari Residential 50.3 43.6



Locations Category of Area Day Time dB(A) Night Time dB(A)

Semra Larpur Residential 44.4 39.8

Shikarpur Residential 48.6 41.3

Mundia Kalan Residential 51.4 43.6

Chanakpur Residential 52.1 42.3

3.9 Land Use Pattern

3.9.1 Land Use Pattern by Revenue Records

The land use pattern indicates the manner in which different parts of land in the study area are being utilized or non-utilized. Unsuitable land use often triggers rapid environmental deterioration and disturbs ecological balance. In census records, major land use classification in village areas are; (a) Forests land, (b) Culturable land, (c) Culturable waste land and (d) Area not available for cultivation. Culturable land is further classified as: irrigated area and un-irrigated area. Area not available for cultivation includes habituated area, barren land, area under water bodies, sand, etc and area covered by site and buildings.

3.9.2 Landuse Pattern within study area

Landuse and land cover have been prepared using False Colour Composite scene of IRS P-4 LISS-III. The area (ha) of different categories of land use/ land covers along the project site is as given in Table 3.22:

Table 3.22: Landuse and Land Cover Rampur District, Uttar Pradesh

Sr. No Types of Area Area in hectares

1 Reporting Area For Land Utilisation Statistics 235726

2 Forests 6611

3 Culturable Waste Land 204

4 Current Fallow 2918

5 Fallow Lands Other than Current Fallows 465

6 Barren and UnCulturable Land 4747

7 Area Under Non Agricultural Uses 27838

8 Permanent Pastures and Other Grazing Lands 3

9 Land Under Misc Tree Crops and Groves 1168

10 Net Area Sown 191772

Source- Economics & Statistics Division, State Planning Institute, U.P., Lucknow, 2001&2011



Non-agricultural Uses This includes all land occupied by buildings, roads and railways or under water, e.g. rivers and canals, and other land put to uses other than agriculture. (20.91%). Permanent Pasture and other Grazing Land This includes all grazing land whether it is permanent pasture and meadows or not. Village common grazing land is included under this heading (00.00 % ). Barren and Un-Culturable Land: This includes all land covered by mountains, deserts, etc. Land which cannot be brought under cultivation except at an exorbitant cost is classified as unculturable whether such land is in isolated blocks or within cultivated holdings (2.01 %) Old Fallow: This includes all land which was taken up for cultivation but is temporarily out of cultivation for a period of not less than one year and not more than five years. Their extent, therefore, varies according to rainfall conditions in different years (0.20 %) Land Use and land cover of the study area through satellite imagery is shown in Figure 3.14.

3.10 Biological Environment

3.10.1 Introduction

The term biological environment covers the prevalence of all living forms plants and animals both terrestrial and aquatic in nearby area. Living forms cover a very wide spectrum of species and even a small area may have thousands of species if all bacteria, protozoa, worms, insects, plants, animals and birds are to be included. In the present study, higher taxa (trees, small trees, shrubs, under shrubs, climbers and grasses) and fauna (mammals, birds and reptiles) are covered for impact assessment purpose. It is needless to emphasize that living system is extremely complicated. They are directly affected by changes in the physical environment but may often either adapt or avoid the adverse environment.

3.10.2 Flora Found in the study area

Biological environment: Anthropogenic activities tend to bring instability in the species composition and functioning of ecosystem. The first component to be affected directly as well as indirectly and in a short, medium and long time span would be the biotic component of the area. This sets a cyclic process, which may aggravate the situation unless corrective measures are adopted. Generation of base-line data and knowing the types and extents of pollutants would be the first step of the environmental study report. The biological assessment is trusonerthy and acceptable method to understand the impact of surroundings. This leads to suggesting remedial measures for minimizing impact.



Table 3.23: List of Trees, Shrubs, Climbers found in the Study Area



3.10.3 Wildlife in the Study Area

The wild animals found in the portion of the district lying north of the Yamuna are the same as those which occur throughout the Gangetic plan. In the same localities hyaenas and wolves are found though the latter have now much decreased in numbers. Large but diminished herds of antelope range over the plains of the north. In places between the Sengar and Yamuna and around Chichauli, Nilgai (Boselaphus tragocamelus) are met with. The fauna of the district also include Indian foxes (Vulpes bengalensis), jackals (Canis aureus), porcupines, monkeys (nigicollis), wild cats (Felis chaus), hares (Lepus ruficandatus) and otters and other numerous animals occur.



Reptiles In the rivers, crocodiles and turtles (aspidertes gangeticus) abound, and tortoises, and other animals occur. Lizards of all kinds abound from the large tree-climbing animals called gosamp to the harmless house lizard; Thanatophidia, especially the cobra and karait (bangarus caearulus) are commonly observed. The other reptiles that are found in the forest of district Auraiya are Ghariyal (gavialis gangeticus), Indian Python (python molurus), and SAL terropin (Kachuga Kachuga). Fish species In the water bodies, Rohu, the small bhur and the patharchatta; and in adition to these the Mugri, Dingar, Haren, Bas, Kalwas, Chal, Katiya, Ghegra, Bighun, Jhingra, Grach, Bam, Papta, Pariyasi, Gudheya, Tengan, Siland, and Jhinga are found. These varieties of fish are highly esteemed as food. Birds The commoner birds comprise the Gray partridge smaller Sandgrouse, snipe and many kinds of quail, the painted partridge the small florican is occasionally found. Blue-rock pigeons are common. The green pigeon or bacial is also found wherever there are pipal trees. The winter months of the district are well stocked with the various kinds of ducks, pochards, sheldrakes and goose. The gray goose and brahminy duck are however more common in the rivers. The district swarms with peacocks. The avifauna include the well-known saras (crane), many kinds of herons and waders, and all the usual varieties of doves, parakeet, sparrows, shrikes, crows, rollers and other passerine birds.

3.10.5 Rare or Endangered Species

As per information obtained from Forest Department, no rare or endangered species of flora or fauna is found in the study area.

3.10.6 Environmental Sensitive Area

There is no wildlife sanctuary, national park or eco-sensitive area within 10 km radius study area.

3.11 Socio-economic Environment

Major developmental activities in industrial sector are required for economical development as well as creation of employment opportunities (direct / indirect) and to meet the basic / modern needs of the society, which ultimately results in overall improvement of quality of life through economical, health, education nutrition status in project region, state as well as the country. The proposed project is also expected to generate/discharge different types of pollutants in the surrounding environment. They may cause natural resource degradation, ecological and human



health risks, unless the development is planned properly and implemented in an environmentally sustainable manner through implementation of pollution prevention, mitigation and control measures. In this manner all developmental projects have direct as well as indirect relationship with socioeconomic aspect, which also include public acceptability for new developmental projects. Thus, the study of socio-economic component incorporating various facets related to prevailing social and cultural conditions and economic status of the project region is an important part of EIA study. The study of socio-economic component incorporating various facts related to socio-economic condition in the area is an integral part of EIA process. This includes demographic structure, population dynamics, infrastructure resources, health status of the community and economic attributes refers to employment, industrial development and sustainability of the project in view of financial terms.

Reconnaissance

Oil marketing companies have projected an increase in demand of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in future due to increase in its domestic use. The demand is likely to increase substantially over the years to come. Oil PSUs have planned enrolment of new customers to saturate the demand potential as per directive of the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Government of India. In line with the requirement envisaged and to ensure fulfilment of demand, MOP&NG has planned that different oil companies should increase storage for LPG. Accordingly Indian Oil Corporation Limited proposes to expand storage capacity at different locations in India to meet the demand IOCL proposes to provide LPG Storage in the form of 1 x 900 MT Mounded Storage Vessel at LPG Bottling Plant, Pattikalan, Tehsil Swar, District- Rampur, Uttar Pradesh which is distributed through LPG Cylinders in various markets of Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand.



3.11.1: Baseline status

Demographic Structure The demographic structure of the study area was derived primarily from data of Census record of Uttar Pradesh covering one district five talukas and Uttarakhand state covering one district and four Taluka. The Demographic structures of each village in the study area as per Census 2011 are presented in Table 3.19(A), Table 3.19(B) and Table 3.19(C), Summary of demographic structure is presented in Table 3.20

Table 3.24 Demographic Structure of Each Village in the Study Area



The salient features of Demographic Structure are as follows:

The study area covers one district Rampur in Utter Pradesh State, one district Udhamsingh Nagar in Uttarakhand state. Total 9 talukas and total 61 villages in the study area

Total study area consisting of 18219.28 ha with the population density of 718 person / km².

Total population in the study region (Census 2011) is worked out as 130791 out of which 68514 are male and 62,277 female.



Out of the total population, Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe are 20969 (16.03%) and

101 (0.08%) respectively.

The literacy rate of the total population is worked out to 68588 (52.44%). Male literacy 40628 (59.23%), and female literacy is 27960 (40.77%)

The total population of main worker, marginal worker and non-worker category are 32184 (24.61%), 8666 (6.63%) and 89941 (68.77%) respectively.

The majority pattern of the agricultural worker other worker and 11722 (36.42%) and is 10941 (34.00%). There are 7883 (24.49%) and 1638 (5.09%) as cultivator worker and household worker:

Sex ratio (number of females per thousand of males) in the region is recorded 909

indicating male population is marginally higher in the region as compared with the female.

Total Child population in the study region (Census 2011) is worked out as 21001 (16.06%) out of which 11068 (52.70%) are boys and 9933 (47.30%) girls.

3.11.2 Infrastructure Resources:

Uttar Pradesh State is under the developmental process. The infrastructure resources in the study area with reference to education, medical facility, water supply, post and telegraph, transportation and communication and power supply are satisfactory.

Education: All villages in the study area have education facilities such as primary school with reasonably good facilities. Due to better transport from villages to nearby District place Etawah. Students have opportunity to travel for better education.

Public Health Services: Very few villages in the study area are having medical facilities. While conducting surveys, out of this area some villages Health facility and other villages having private clinic, for better medical treatment, the people move to nearby town and district please Etawah where medical facilities are available.

Drinking Water: In surveyed all villages, it was found that people are using tank ,well tube well, hand pump water for drinking purposes; however, pond water also used of other purpose. There is no drinking water problem.

Power Supply: Electricity is available in all the surveyed villages. During the survey it was found that there is frequent load shedding. All purpose is using Electricity facility in the study area. Solar system was also available in all surveyed villages. Electricity use in the study area is all purposes

Communication and Transportation: All villages having good road facility in the study area. It was observed that bus services are limited and primarily buses run in the whole day, on national highway. Regular local transport facility is available in the villages, like auto rickshaw.



All villages having good road facility in the study area. Some villages are having sub post office facilities, and all villages having phone facility. Road Approach: All villages are having road, approach routes either paved road, mud road or foot path. Pattikalan is well-connected by roads with the rest of Uttar Pradesh state. National Highway 74 passes through pattikalan, connecting it to important cities like Kashipur and Rudrapur, Haridwar, Dehradun and New Delhi.

Banks: All centralized bank in Taluka place city and district place Etawah. People are using bank facility for saving money.

Gram Panchyayat: The gram panchayat, Panchayat Samitee and Zila Parishad are the three responsible functionaries in the decentralization of administration, which are entrusted with the implementation of developmental schemes in the state for five-year plans and to provide for decentralization of powers and functions under certain enactments was passed in 1961

3.11.3: Economic Attributes:

The classification of workers is related with their occupation. Economic resource based of any region mainly depends upon its economically active group i.e. the working population involved in productive work. Work may be defined as participation in any economically productive activity. Such participation may be physical or mental in nature. Work involves not actual work but also effective supervision and direction of work. It also includes unpaid work on farm or in family enterprise. There are different types of workers that may be classified as under with main workers employment pattern given in Table 3.25.

Table 3.25 (A)

Main Worker Employment Pattern (U.P.)

Sr. No.

Villages Main Cultivator

Main Agriculture

Main Household

Main Other Worker

Suar (Uttar Pradesh)

1. Nayagaon Najibabad

243 24 30 49

2. Lohari 13 0 0 6

3. Shikarpur 306 59 8 126

4. Loharra Inayat Ganj 68 43 0 97

5. Khushalpur 39 591 1 68

6. Manpur North 291 186 42 229

7. Milak Khaud 3 5 0 0

8. Khaud Kalan 154 376 7 168

9. Patti Kalan 234 866 4 101

10. Karimpur 144 85 3 44

11. Semra Larpur 478 332 7 163

12. Larpur Semra 135 432 41 102

13. Shekhupura 81 95 18 56

14. Hasanpur North 56 33 5 63

Total 2245 3127 166 1272

Tanda

15. Surajpur 109 109 0 41

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uttar_Pradesh

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Highway_19_(India)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Highway_19_(India)



16. Noorpur 235 58 25 88

17. Rajpura Tanda 38 2 0 33

Total 382 169 25 162

Bilaspur

18. Mundia Kalan 222 101 24 84

Total 222 101 24 84

Rampur

19. Kashipur 913 1564 304 451

20. Ajitpur (CT) 202 434 495 2495

21. Rampura 228 110 24 17

Total 1343 2108 823 2963

shahabad

22. Sarkara 19 11 0 7

23. Barkhera 135 1 0 8

Total 154 12 0 15

Grand Total 4346 5517 1038 4496

Percentage 28.23 35.83 6.74 29.20

Source: Census 2011 Rampur-District, State- Uttar Pradesh

Table 3.25(B)

Main Worker Employment Pattern (U.K)

Sr. No.


Main Agriculture

Main Household

Main Other Worker

Kashipur ,Udham Singh Nagar (Uttarakhand)

1. Ujjain 45 26 3 338

2. Rampura 53 89 15 196

3. Kundsebara 19 130 17 88

4. Jaspur Khurd 72 66 56 1771

5. Gangapur Gosain 69 83 2 40

6. Sitarampur 68 35 0 1

7. Dohari Vakil 71 239 5 76

8. Kundeswari 230 364 60 641

9. Dhakia Kalan 710 1103 264 419

10. Pachchawala 10 1 6 51

11. Ginni Khera 47 11 4 145

12. Khai Khera 92 27 3 30

13. Khokhratal 24 1 3 21

14. Pasiapura 65 71 29 597

15. Shivlalpur Dallu 115 47 2 90

16. Jaitpur Ghosi 33 92 0 61

17. Sand Khera 13 42 2 159

18. Dohari Parsa 32 36 1 103

19. Barkhera Rajpoot 28 10 0 67

20. Dabhaura Aihatmali 128 283 8 1

21. Rajpura Rani 79 148 1 97

22. Dabhauramustahkam 253 589 40 294

Total 2256 3493 521 5286

Jaspur

23. Kalyanpur 56 0 0 4



Total 56 0 0 4

Bajpur

24. Mukandpur 25 13 0 1

25. Mandia Baksi 79 48 8 11

26. Mehtabwan 92 88 0 8

27. Mahuadali 11 24 0 1

28. Keshowala 126 267 0 24

29. Mundia Kalan 137 546 16 225

30. Rampura Sakar 159 106 0 71

31. Harlalpur 42 159 0 125

32. Mundia Pistor 32 170 32 109

33. Tali 54 25 3 14

34. Maheshpura 127 882 16 467

35. Sultanpur 0 41 0 2

36. Pipalia 98 12 1 46

37. Jagannathpur 109 265 3 34

Total 1091 2646 79 1138

Gadarpur

38. Mukundpur 134 66 0 17

Total 134 66 0 17

Grand Total 3537 6205 600 6445

21.07 36.96 3.57 38.39

Source: Census 2011 Udhamsingh Nagar-District, State- Uttarakhand

Sr. No.


Main Agriculture

Main Household

Main Other Worker

Kashipur ,Udham Singh Nagar (Uttarakhand)

1. Sub Total( UP) 4346 5517 1038 4496

2. Sub Total( UK) 3537 6205 600 6445

Grand Total 7883 11722 1638 10941

Percentage 24.49 36.42 5.09 34.00

Source: Primary Census Abstract– 2011, Udhamsingh Nagar-District, State- Uttarakhand and Rampur-District, State- Uttar Pradesh



3.11.4: Health Status

Health of the people is not only a desirable goal, but it is also an essential investment in human resources. As per the National Health Policy (1983), Primary Health Care has been accepted as main instrument for achieving this goal of development and strengthening rural health infrastructure through a three-tier system, viz., Primary Health Center (PHCs), Sub Centers and Community Health Center, which have been established as shown below:

Diarrhea / Cholera, Malaria, eye disease, tuberculosis, respiratory infection, skin disease and Unhygienic are the general health problems which are attributed due to improper sanitation, mosquito nuisance and water logging. Malaria is one of the most frequently occurring diseases and also respiratory infection in the region. Lack of building, shortage of manpower and inadequate provision of drug supplies are hampering the Operationalization of these units.

3.11.5: Cultural and Aesthetic Attributes

Tourism is an important aspect of human life. It is a part of the service sector of an economy and is a big source of employment generation and foreign exchange earnings. Tourism has become a knowledge based industry. Tourism can be for sightseeing, holidaying, education, business, medical treatment, rejuvenation of mind and body etc. In many countries tourism is treated as an industry.

Udham Singh Nagar district is Uttarakhand state in northern India. Rudrapur is the district headquarters. This district consists of seven Tehsils named Bajpur, Gadarpur, Jaspur, Kashipur, Kichha, Khatima, Sitarganj. The district is located in the Terai region, and is part of Kumaon Division. It is named for freedom fighter and Indian revolutionary Shaheed-i-Azam Sardar Udham Singh.

Rampur is a city and a municipality in and headquarters of Rampur District in the Indian state of Uttar Pradesh. It was formerly known for its various industries, including sugar refining and cotton milling. The Rulers of Rampur have had distinct impact on the architecture of the region. The buildings and monuments signify the presence of Mughal type architecture. Some of the buildings are very old and have been built over repeatedly in course of time.One of the most well designed monument is the Fort of Rampur. It also houses the Raza Library or Hamid Manzil, the former palace of the Rulers. It has a sizable collection of Oriental manuscripts. The fort also houses the Imambara.The Jama Masjid is one of the finest piece of architecture to be found in Rampur. It resembles the jama masjid in Delhi to some extent and has a beautiful interior. It was built by Nawab Faizullah Khan. It has a unique mughal touch to it. There are several entry-exit gates to the masjid. It has three big domes and four tall minarets with gold pinnacles boasting of a royal touch. It has a main lofty entrance gate that has an inbuilt clock tower occupied by a big clock that was imported from Britain.There are several entry-exit gates built by the Nawab. These gates are major entry-exit routes from the city. Examples are Shahbad Gate, Nawab Gate, Bilaspur Gate etc.



There was no any big temple in the study area. Some village has Hanuman temple,Ram mandir and mazjid also. This proposed project no side effect of cultural and aesthetic attributes.

3.11.6: Sampling Methodology

A judgmental and purposive sampling method was used for choosing respondents of various sections of the society i.e. Sarpanch, adult males and females, teachers, medical practitioners, businessmen, agriculture labourers, unemployed group etc. Judgmental and purposive sampling method includes the right cases from the total population that helps to fulfill the purpose of study needs.

3.11.7: Data Collection Method

In order to assess and evaluate the likely impacts arising out of any developmental projects on socio-economic environment, it is necessary to gauge the apprehensions of the people in the project area. For the process of data collection through primary and secondary sources certain methods are used are given below:

3.11.8: Field Survey and Observations

Field survey and observations is made at each sampling villages and the quality of life of that region is studied. Visits are made at hospitals, primary health centres and sub-centres to know the health status of the region. Various governmental organizations such as statistical department, department of census operations are visited to collect the population details of that region.

3.11.9: Interview Method

Structured interview method is used to collect data regarding the awareness and opinion from the sample selected of the various socio-economic sections of the community. Structured interviews involve the use of a set of predetermined questions that includes fixed and alternative questions. The questionnaire mainly highlights the parameters such as income, employment and working conditions, housing, food, clothing, water supply, sanitation, health, energy, transportation and communication, education, environment and pollution to assess the quality of life of that particular region and general awareness and opinion of the respondents about the project. Interview method helps to collect more correct and accurate information as the interviewer is presented during the field survey. Socio-economic survey was conducted in 8 villages within the study area located in all directions with reference to the project site. The respondents were asked for their awareness / opinion about the project and also the impacts of the project which is an important aspect of socio-economic environment, viz. job opportunities, education, health care, transportation facility and economic status.

Observations during Socio-economic Survey

The salient observations recorded during survey in the study area are:



Every villages having Gram panchyat

Most of the surveyed villages are having Anganwadi facilities.

The survey reported that most of the villages have primary and middle school facility, for further education student have to go about 10 km away. Maximum educational level of the study area is up to 10th standard. In the study area observed that most of student choose English medium for education .For higher & technical education people have to go to Taluka place and District place. Some school having bus facility.

Communication facilities are very good; people are using mobile cell phone. Dish TV are also available in the study area.

A road approach is mainly pakka road. Road construction is very good. Each and every village connects to the pakka(main) road. For travelling purpose government bus service and other private sources are available for villagers in this region.

Bore well, tank water, well and hand pump are the main source of drinking water supply in the region. There is no drinking water problem.

Sanitation facilities are good condition. 70% villagers are using toilets. Some of the villages having proper gutter line for waste water disposal.

Health condition of villagers is good in this area; villagers are satisfied with the health centers because they are getting proper treatment from Government Hospitals. Private clinics are also available in study area.

Electricity is available in almost all the villages. Most of the villages having irrigation facility through electricity. Electricity use for all purpose in the study area.

LPG gas and Wood is major fuel for cooking purpose; kerosene is also used in some villagers.

Most of the people are engaged in agricultural and livestock activities. Farming is the main occupation, a few respondents have service in government sector and most of respondent are labor. Some other is trying to migrate in other places. In the study area villagers are engaged in agriculture work, industrial work, small business like shop, There are three cropping seasons in the district rabi, kharif and zaid. Paddy, Wheat, maize, jowar (sorghum), bajra (pearl millet), arhar (pigeon pea),moong (green gram) and urd are the major crops of this area. Qualities of houses are in satisfactory condition and mostly people have cemented concrete constructed houses but some villagers are living in poor condition.

Self Help Group (SHG) is actively strong in maximum villages.

Hindi is the official language but few people known Urdu and English, because day by day increasing English medium educational facility.

3.11.10: Awareness and Opinion of People about the Project

An attempt has been made to know the awareness and opinion of the people about proposed project



Most of villagers are aware about the LPG Bottling Plant, Pattikalan,

The respondents were happy to know about the LPG Bottling Plant, Pattikalan and they respond positively because they feel that they may get jobs because of these activities. They are unaware about the pollution generation from this plant as it is to be proposed unable predict the pollution.

3.11.11: Quality of Life:

Standard indicators of the quality of life include not only wealth and employment but also the built environment, physical and mental health, education, recreation and leisure time, and social belonging. Quality of life is an important concept in the field of international development, since it allows development to be analyzed on a measure broader than standard of living.

In this area living standard of life is very good, all are the facilities is good and satisfactory level due to good economic status like income, employment, educational facilities and also availability of basic needs, viz. food, clothing, and housing. Main indicator of quality of life is given below:

Socio-economic Indicators

01 Income 07 Water Supply and Sanitation

13 Environment and Pollution

02 Employment 08 Clothing 14 Recreation

03 Working Condition

09 Energy 15 Social Security

04 Housing 10 Transportation 16 Human Rights

05 Food 11 Communication

06 Health 12 Education



Figure3.9: Graph of Demographic Structure



CHAPTER 4:

ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION MEASURES

4.1 Introduction

The anticipated environmental impacts on various components of environment due to proposed construction of one additional LPG mounded storage vessel (900 MT capacity) at Pattikalan LPG plant of IOCL can be assessed in terms of i) physical environment ii) biological environment, and iii) demographic, land use and socioeconomic environment. For proper assessment of significance and magnitude of environmental changes in construction and operation of the existing Pattikalan Rampur LPG Plant and construction of proposed additional LPG mounded storage vessel the impacts are analyzed for each environmental parameters. An assessment is made both for adverse and beneficial impacts in following section.

4.2 Physical Environment

4.2.1 Soil

During Construction Phase

During the construction of one additional LPG mounded storage vessel (900 MT capacity), there will be a small amount of construction wastes, such as, metal cutting, oil, grease and debris, which may contaminate soil at the site of construction. However, the extent of contamination will not be significant. These wastes will not normally contaminate ground water. Their impact on soil and surface water will be restricted to the construction period in small area around the construction site during heavy rainfall only. Mitigation Measures

Collection of metal cuttings, oil, grease and construction debris from the site.

Solid waste collection bins at the site.

Maintaining housekeeping at construction site.

During Operation Phase

During operation phase of existing LPG plant and proposed one additional LPG mounded storage vessel for storage of LPG, no process waste will be generated. About 22.4 kg solid wastes will also be generated from office and canteen. Used oil will be generated at the time of maintenance of DG sets. For collection, management and disposal of solid and hazardous wastes from the Pattikalan Rampur LPG plant, necessary mitigation measures will be taken same as for existing LPG Plant.

Mitigation Measures

Maintaining housekeeping at LPG plant.

Approx 22.4 kg day municipal wastes (paper plastic, food wastes, etc) will be generated, which will be collected and segregated. Recyclable wastes like paper and



plastic wastes will be sent for recycling. Biodegradable wastes like food and vegetable wastes will be disposed compost pit. Non- biodegradable and non- recyclable wastes will be sent to common landfill site.

From the maintenance of DG sets, 540 litres used oil is generated, which is categorized as hazardous wastes and handed over to Uttar Pradesh Pollution Control Board (UPPCB) authorized used oil recyclers.

4.2.2 Water Quality


The construction phase may result in minor soil erosion from the LPG plant site, as it will clear of ground flora and excavation for construction of one mounded vessel. The runoff from the construction site during rainfall may cause some increase in the quantity of suspended solids and turbidity in the runoff in natural drain. However, this impact will be of temporary nature and may not last as soon as excavated soil established and construction debris will be disposed of properly.

Mitigation measures

Excavation of foundations for mounded vessel will be carried out during dry season.

Construction debris will be collected and disposed properly daily basis.

Sanitary facilities for workers will be provided.

DURING OPERATION PHASE

No process effluents will be generated during operation of existing and after expansion LPG Plant. During operation of the existing and after expansion of LPG plant, 3 KLD domestic waste water will be generated will be treated in properly designed septic tanks and discharged into soak pit.

Waste water from canteen at the LPG Plant will be treated in oil and grease trap followed by septic tank and soak pit.

Municipal wastes (paper plastic, food wastes, etc) generated from LPG plant will be collected and segregated. Recyclable wastes like paper and plastic wastes will be sent for recycling, while biodegradable wastes like food and vegetable wastes will be disposed in compost pit. Non- biodegradable and non- recyclable wastes will be sent to common landfill site.

Used oil (540 litres) is generated from the maintenance of DG sets will be handed over to UPPCB authorized used oil recyclers.



4.2.3 Climatology and Meteorology

The construction and operation phase of proposed expansion of existing LPG Plant will have no impact on meteorology of the area. Therefore, no mitigation measure is required.

4.2.4 Air Quality


A certain amount of particulate matter will be generated during the construction phase of additional one LPG mounded storage vessel at LPG plant. However, the suspended particulate matter in ambient air as a result of construction activities may be relatively coarse and will be settled within a short distance. Therefore, the impact will be restricted within the close vicinity of the construction activity. Further, for construction of additional one LPG mounded storage vessel at LPG plant, construction activities will be taken place for 12 months only, therefore, impacts will be observed for short period and reversible in nature.

Mitigation Measures

Cordoning off construction area by tin sheets & garden net

Dust suppression measures like water sprinkling as per requirement. During Operation Phase

During operation of existing LPG plant after expansion, there will not be any process emission sources. No emissions will be generated during the bottling operations as the entire bottling process is carried out closed circuit through piping from storage area to filling shed.

Very small quality of fugitive emissions of hydrocarbon may result from unloading hose, faulty bottling, leaking cylinders and minor leaks. Gas detectors have been placed at the LPG plant at strategic locations to detect concentration of hydrocarbon in the premises.

DG sets installed at Pattikalan Rampur LPG Bottling plant are operated occasionally in case of power failure and these are not regular source of gaseous emissions.

LPG lorries and trucks have pollution under control (PUC) certificates. Regular maintenance of LPG lorries and trucks is ensured.

4.2.5 Noise


During the construction phase, cold cutting of metal sheets, bending, hammering, erection of equipment, vehicle movement, DG sets may be major sources of noise generation during construction of proposed one additional LPG mounded storage vessel at the LPG bottling plant. Relatively high noise levels will be generated during construction phase. Anticipated noise levels from various sources are as given below in Table 4.1:



Table 4.1: Anticipated Noise Levels from Various Sources

Sn. Sources Anticipated Noise Levels

1. DG set 90 dB(A)

2. Metal cutting and bending 80 dB(A)

3. Hammering 85 dB(A)

4. Erection of equipment 75 dB(A)

Generation of noise levels from above sources will be intermittent in the nature. The noise level generated from the construction site would decrease with increase in distance from the source due to the wave divergence effect.

Modelling for Noise Emissions from Construction Site

For dispersion modelling of noise, standard mathematical model for sound wave propagation have been used. The sound pressure level generated by noise sources decreases with increasing distance from the source due to wave divergence. An additional decrease in sound pressure level from the source is expected due to atmospheric effect or its interaction with objects in the transmission path. For hemispherical sound wave propagation through homogeneous loss free medium, one can estimated noise levels at various locations due to different sources using model based on first principles, as per the following equation: Noise (Receptor) = Noise (Source) - 20 Log [distance (Receptor) /distance (Source)] The combined effect of all the sources then can be determined at various locations by the following equation. Lp (total) = 10 Log (10(Lp1/10) +10(Lp2/10)+10(Lp3/10) ) Where Lp1, LP2, LP3

are noise pressure levels at a point due to different sources. The resultant maximum noise level from site is calculated as 85 dB (A). Assuming no environmental attenuation factors, noise modelling has been done which shows that noise level at different distance from the site has been shown in Table 4.2:

Table 4.2: Noise Level at Various Distances

Noise Levels (dB (A)) Distance from Source (m)

85 0.9

80 1.5

75 2.7

70 4.8

65 8.5



Noise Levels (dB (A)) Distance from Source (m)

60 15.1

55 26.9

50 47.9

Graphical presentation of noise attenuation during construction site is shown in Figure 4.1.

The above noise modelling results show that the noise levels will remain below acceptable level within short distance inside the LPG Bottling plant. Further, the resultant noise level will mingle with the background noise level (assumed to be 55 dB (A) at 26.9 m during day time. The above noise levels are without mitigative measures. With the mitigative measures, the noise levels will be further restricted within very short distance from the LPG Bottling plant.

Mitigation Measures

Use of ear muff and ear plugs to workers working in high noise area.

Acoustic enclosures are already fitted with DG sets. Therefore, no significant impact is anticipated on noise levels during construction phase of proposed one additional LPG mounded storage vessel at Pattikalan Rampur LPG bottling plant.


No regular noise generation is expected due to the operation of LPG bottling plant after proposed one additional LPG mounded storage vessel. DG sets are to be operated only during grid power failure.

Figure 4.1: Attenuation of Noise Level During Operation Phase



Mitigation Measures

Equipment specification and installation of acoustic enclosure with DG sets ensure low level of noise generation.

All the LPG Lorries and trucks are essentially fitted with silencers to control noise generation.

Peripheral green belt has been developed around the LPG plant, which acts as noise barrier.

Therefore, on significant impact on noise levels of the study area due operation of existing LPG plant and after construction of one mounded vessel will be insignificant.

Terrestrial Ecology


The site of construction of one mounded vessel is free from trees and shrubs, therefore, during construction phase, no vegetation needs to be will be cleared. Therefore, no impact is anticipated on terrestrial ecology of the area.


At the existing LPG Plant, peripheral green belt has been develop on 10 Acres area, which is 35.71% of the total area of the LPG plant. During operation phase of LPG plant after one mounded vessel, no impact on green belt of the depot and ecology of the study area is anticipated. Growth of plantation and development of green belt at the LPG plant is likely to improve the flora and fauna at the site.

4.3 Demographic, Land Use And Socio-economic Environment

4.3.1 Demographic

During construction phase, only 30 workers will be deployed, mostly from local area. The construction of proposed one mounded vessel within LPG plant will not displace any person.

Operation of the LPG bottling plant will not require large work force and existing 50 persons will be sufficient after expansion of bottling plant. Therefore, large scale immigration will not take place and the impact on demography of the area will be insignificant.

4.3.2 Land Use

The construction of proposed one mounded vessel within LPG plant will have no impact on land use in the study area, as land for construction of proposed one mounded vessel within LPG plant is already available within the existing LPG Plant.



4.3.4 Socio-economic

4.2.1.1 Economic Impacts

The construction and operation of the proposed One mounded vessel within LPG plant will have some beneficial impact due to increase in incomes as local unskilled, semiskilled and skilled persons as they will gain some direct and indirect employment. However, in view of the small manpower and support facility requirements, the beneficial impact due to the operation of the one mounded vessel within LPG plant is likely to be marginal.

4.2.1.2 Social Impacts

Since the immigration of work force during construction and operation of the proposed one mounded vessel within LPG plant will be likely to be very small, the impact on facilities and cultural aspects are expected to be insignificant.

4.3.4 Sustainable Development And Environmental Protection

At the center of the socio-economic impact lies the question of whether economic development and growth can go hand in hand with environmental protection. The construction of proposed the mounded vessel within Pattikalan LPG plant is not likely to have any negative impact if the proposed mitigation for environmental management are implemented by the IOCL management. The construction of proposed one mounded vessel (1 x 900 MT) within LPG plant will have a definite beneficial impacts, even though marginal, on infrastructures facilities, gross economic product, employment opportunities and socio-economic aspects of the area.



CHAPTER 5:

ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS

5.1 Introduction

The consideration of technological alternatives for proposed 1 x 900 MT Mounded Storage Vessel at LPG Bottling Plant Pattikalan is one of the more proactive side of environmental assessment - enhancing the project through examining options instead of only focusing on the more defensive task of reducing adverse impacts of a single option of the project. This requires the systematic comparison of feasible alternatives for technology and operational alternatives. Alternatives are compared in terms of their potential environmental impacts, capital and recurrent costs, suitability under local conditions, etc. The examining alternative means of carrying out a project involves answering the following three questions:

(i) What are the alternatives?, (ii) What are the environmental impacts associated with each alternative?, and (iii) What is the rationale for selecting the preferred alternative?

5.2 Alternative Technology

IOCL has planned to install 1 no. of 900 MT capacity mounded at the existing LPG bottling plant. IOCL has proven technology of installation and operation of mounded vessel. The expertise of IOCL in mounded vessel storage is well proven and working efficiently at different locations of the country. IOCL is having excellent track record and progressive outlook in regularly updating its technology. The technology adopted by IOCL for installation of mounded bullets for storage of LPG is a fail-safe especially for BLEVE.

5.3 Alternative Site

The proposed 1 x 900 MT capacity LPG mounded vessel will be installed within existing LPG plant at IOCL Pattikalan-Rampur, Kashipur-Rudrapur road, Tehsil Swar, District : Rampur, Uttar Pradesh. The LPG plant is located near high demand area and the area is also developing. There is no likelihood of any residential development in the vicinity of the LPG Plant. Possible mutual aid in emergency will be available in the industrial area. Adequate availability of land within the LPG plant for setting up one mounded vessel of 900 MT capacity is available.

5.4 Alternatives For LPG Storage And Filling Facilities

The IOCL Pattikalan-Rampur LPG plant and bottling facilities are located in Uttar Pradesh State In dustrial Development Corporation (UPSIDC) Industrial area, where infrastructure facilities such as land, road, power, etc are already available. No land acquisition is required



for the installation of mounded vessel and adverse impacts related to land acquisition will not be appeared.

5.5 Alternative For Risk Reduction For LPG

Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) handling has many challenges due to its inherent dangerous properties. Some of the major fires/explosions have underlined the need for total in depth review of design, procedures maintenance fire fighting and safety aspects in LPG handling. For bulk LPG storage and bottling facilities, mounded storage bullets technology has been selected as per OISD 150. The major benefit of mounded storage bullets is that it eliminates possibility of Boiling Liquid Expanding Vapour Explosion (BLEVE). The BLEVE in mounded storage vessel cannot occur, therefore, mounded storage of LPG is considered relatively safe in comparison to above ground bullets and Horton spheres. Further, mounded bullets will be automated and cathodically protected, hence, possibility of release of LPG will be negligible and system will be relatively safe. The cover of the mound protects the bullets from fire engulfment, radiation from a fire in close proximity and acts of sabotage or vandalism. The area of land required to locate mounded system is minimal compared to conventional storage. Mounded vessel are semi-conventional pressure vessel, covered by a layer of sand and stone aggregates. The cover of the mound protects the vessel from fire engulfment, radiation from a fire in close proximity and acts of sabotage or vandalism.



CHAPTER 6:

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PLAN

6.1 Introduction

Regular monitoring program for the environmental parameters is essential to take account the changes in the environment due to construction of One mounded vessel at existing IOCL Pattikalan - Rampur LPG bottling plant. To ensure the effective implementation of the mitigation measures and environmental management plan during operation phase of LPG bottling Plant after construction of one mounded vessel, it is essential that an effective environmental monitoring plan be designed and followed during operation phases. The objectives of environmental monitoring plan for IOCL Pattikalan - Rampur LPG bottling plant are:

To verify the results of the impact assessment study in particular with regards to proposed pipeline;

To follow the trend of concentration values of the parameters which have been identified as critical;

To check or assess the efficiency of the mitigation measures; and

To ensure that new parameters, other than those identified in the impact assessment study, do not become critical at LPG bottling plant of IOCL after expansion.

The environmental monitoring is the primary tool for assessing the prevailing quality of air, water, noise, land etc. The environmental monitoring helps in suggesting and taking corrective course corrections, monitored parameters are exceeding. The monitoring of various environmental parameters for ambient air quality, water quality, noise levels, soil quality will be carried out on a regular basis at and around the existing IOCL Pattikalan-Rampur LPG bottling plant of after expansion to ascertain the following:

Pollution caused due to operations of the mounded bullets within existing LPG plant of IOCL.

Change in environmental quality within and outside the existing LPG Plant of IOCL

To assess environmental impacts after expansion of existing LPG Plant.

Evaluate the efficiency of pollution control measures installed.

The environmental monitoring shall be periodic and comply with the promulgated standards. The frequency of monitoring of various environmental components and frequency to be monitored is given in Table 6.1.

6.2 Environmental Monitoring Schedules

To check the efficacy of the adopted mitigation measures and environmental Management plan, post project monitoring is carried out for various environmental parameters. In case, the monitored results of environmental parameter are found to exceed the



allowable/stipulated values, the Environmental Management Cell suggests remedial actions and gets these suggestions implemented through the concerned personnel.

6.2.1 Ambient Air Quality (AAQ) Monitoring

Ambient air quality parameters suggested during operation phase of the proposed new storage tanks within existing IOCL Pattikalan-Rampur LPG bottling plant are Particulate Matters (PM2.5), Particulate Matter (PM10), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Sulphur Dioxide (SO2), Carbon Monoxide (CO), HC and VOC. These are to be monitored at designated locations starting from the commencement of construction activities. Data should be generated 24 hourly during operation phase at identified locations in accordance to the National Ambient Air Quantity Standards. During operation phase, there will not be any major source of air emissions except DG sets and vehicular emissions from Pattikalan-Rampur LPG Plant. Six monthly ambient air quality monitoring should be carried out at boundaries of LPG Plant for Particulate Matters (PM2.5), Particulate Matter (PM10), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Sulphur Dioxide (SO2), Carbon Monoxide (CO), Methane and Non-methane HC and VOC.

6.2.2 Water Quality Monitoring

At the plant, there will not be any source for ground and surface water contamination during construction and operation phases of installation of one mounded vessel. However, ground water sampling and analysis can be carried out at the LPG bottling facility during operation phases during installation of one mounded vessel. The locations, duration and pollution parameters to be monitored and necessary institutional arrangements are detailed in the environmental monitoring plan. The monitoring of the ground water quality will be carried out at one location in accordance to Indian Standard Drinking Water Specification-IS 10500:2012 for relevant parameters as directed by Uttar Pradesh Pollution Control Board (UPPCB).

6.2.3 Noise Levels Monitoring

During operation phase of existing LPG plant after installation of mounded vessel, noise will be generated cylinders handling, DG sets operation, vehicles/truck movement. The measurement of noise levels would be carried out at suggested locations in accordance to the Ambient Noise Standards formulated by Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC). Noise levels would be monitored on twenty-four hourly basis. Noise measurements should be recorded at “A” weighted frequency using a slow time response mode of the measuring instrument. The noise measurement location and duration are detailed in the environmental monitoring plan.

6.3 Environmental Monitoring Plan

Environmental monitoring plan for operation phases of the existing Plant including installation of one mounded storage vessel is given in Table 6.1.



Table 6.1: Environmental Monitoring Plan for IOCL Pattikalan-Rampur Plant

Environmental Component

Project stage Parameter Standards Location Duration / Frequency

Implementation Supervision

Ambient Air Construction Phase

PM2.5, PM10, SO2, NO2, CO &

National Ambient Quality Standards

At the plant site Continuous 24-hourly

Environmental Cell of IOCL or MoEF&CC/ UPPCB/ NABL approved monitoring agency

IOCL

Operation Phase HC and VOC

-- Mounded vessel Area

Continuous 24-hourly once six monthly

Environmental Cell of IOCL or MoEF&CC/ UPPCB/NABL approved monitoring agency

IOCL

PM2.5, PM10, SO2, NO2, CO & HC on Boundary of LPG Plant

National Ambient Quality Standards

At boundary wall in upwind and down wind direction at boundary of LPG Bottling Plant

Continuous 24-hourly once six months

IOCL through MoEF&CC/ UPPCB/NABL approved monitoring agency

IOCL

Water Quality Construction Phase

As per IS: 10500:2012 for relevant parameters

As Water quality standards (IS 10500:2012)

Mounded Vessel Installation area

Six Monthly IOCL through MoEF&CC/ UPPCB/NABL approved monitoring agency

IOCL

Operation Phase As per IS: 10500:2012 for relevant parameters in consultation with UPPCB

As Water quality standards (IS 10500:2012)

With LPG Plant site

Six Monthly IOCL through MoEF&CC/ UPPCB/NABL approved monitoring agency

IOCL



Environmental Component

Project stage Parameter Standards Location Duration / Frequency

Implementation Supervision

Noise Measurements

Construction Phase

Noise Level in dB (A)

As per National Noise standards

Near one mounded Vessel installation Site

24-hourly measurement, once quarterly during the construction phase

IOCL through MoEF/UPPCB/ NABL approved monitoring agency

IOCL

Operation Phase Noise Level in dB (A)

As per National Noise standards

Bottling Area Lorry and Truck Parking Area

24-hourly measurement, once six months

IOCL through MoEF&CC/ UPPCB/ NABL approved monitoring agency

IOCL



6.4 Health, Safety & Environmental Management Cell

In order to implement the environmental management program efficiently within the organization, periodical monitoring as per statutory guidelines and mid course corrections/actions, if required based on the environmental monitoring results, management intends to establish environmental cell for successful implementation. The roles & responsibilities are clearly defined among the personnel within the environmental cell. The responsibilities of personnel are given in Table 6.2. Table 6.2: Responsibilities of Personnel of the HS&E Cell

Designation Responsibility

Chief Plant Manager

Over all planning, execution and management of environmental protective measures and monitoring of parameters and various Socio-economic measures, disaster management measures and training programs regularly.

Safety In charge To ensure the activities are carried out as per the safety standard and all the employed given safety a primary importance while working at the LPG Plant .

Manager- In Charge

Overall in-charge of Monitoring of Environmental parameters and effectiveness of environmental protective measures taken and decide about the additional protective measures in safeguarding the overall ecology and environment.

Safety Officer

Safety measures in plant, Regular medical, health check up and eye camp were being organised for employees, TT crews, Contract laboures.

6.5 Statutory Returns and Compliance Reports

The statutory returns and compliance reports here below are regularly to be submitted to the Uttar Pradesh Pollution Control Board (UPPCB).

Submission of half yearly compliance report in respect of the stipulated prior environmental clearance terms and conditions in hard and soft copies to the regulatory authority concerned, on 1st June and 1st December of each calendar year.

Submission of compliance of air consent being done.

Submission of compliance of water consent being done.



CHAPTER 7

RISK ASSESSMENT & DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN

7.1 Risk Assessment and Disaster Management Plan

Hazard identification, HAZOP and risk assessment for LPG plant including proposed one mounded vessel have been carried and risk mitigation measures have been spelled to enhance safety at the IOCL Pattikaln - Rampur LPG bottling Plant and same is presented as Appendix 1 A of EIA Report Emergency Response Disaster Management Plan for unlikely event of emergency is available and same is presented as Appendix 1 B of EIA Report.



CHAPTER 8

PROJECT BENEFITS

8.1 Introduction

The demand for LPG is ever growing with market and addition of new consumers through Government schemes to reduce pollution due to use of fire wood and safe guard the environment. The proposed installation of with addition of 1 x 900MT mounded storage vessel to increase the storage capacity of LPG at the existing IOCL Rampur Pattikalan LPG bottling plant will reduce the gap in demand and supply of LPG cylinders especially for household purpose.

8.2 Direct Benefits

The proposed installation of 1 mounded vessel of 900 MT capacity each, at existing LPG bottling plant, will yield following benefits:

Provide continuity of LPG gas cylinder supply to the consumers through distributors.

By implementation of 1 x 900 MT capacity mounded vessel, risk profile of the

existing LPG plant will not be enhanced

Availability of LPG will discourage deforestation and reduce the use of fire wood &

fossil fuels.

Improve the quality of life of women engaged in household activities specially in

cooking.

8.3 Improvement in the Social Infrastructure

The expansion of storage capacity of LPG bottling Plant will create opportunities for direct and indirect employment in the area. The LPG bottling plant will initiate local economic growth and thereby the potential to enhance quality of life of the local communities. Local population may get benefited due to availability of clean fuel after proposed installation at existing LPG plant.

8.4 Employment Potential

About 100 work force of different categories on an average basis are engaged during construction phase of mounded vessel. The project activities will provide employment to persons of different skills and trades. The local population will be given preference depending on availability to employment of different categories during construction phase.



During operational phase, about 20 people will get direct and many more indirect employment opportunity. Local people will get employment opportunity for security, house-keeping, maintenance, etc at the plant and indirectly at LPG plant.

8.5 Reduction of Emissions

The proposed expansion of LPG bottling plant will be helpful in ensuring availability of LPG for domestic and industrial establishments which will help in minimization of use fossil fuel (petrol, HSD, furnace oil, etc), coal and wood. It will, therefore, help in maintaining cleaner environment due to reduction in emissions. Use of LPG by domestic and industrial users will also help in reduction in generation of green house gases responsible for global warming.

8.6 Other Tangible Benefits

The proposed installation at LPG plant shall create tangible benefits as described below:

No private land acquisition is required for installation of one mounded vessel at Pattikalan -Rampur LPG plant. The socio-economic impacts linked to the acquisition of land and structures will not appear in the project.

During operation phase of installation of 1 x 900 MT capacity LPG mounded vessel at Pattikalan - Rampur LPG plant, no significant impacts on environment are anticipated.

This proposed installation will generate direct and indirect employment opportunities mainly during the operation phase. Local semi-skilled and unskilled labourers will get direct employment in operation phase. This is a moderate positive impact of the proposed project.

The installation/expansion in the project at the LPG plant will provide cleaner fuel to more people, which will create healthy environmental conditions in the region.



CHAPTER 9

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

9.1 Introduction

Environment Management Plan (EMP) for construction and operation phase is required to ensure that mitigation of adverse impacts and strengthening of positive impact resulting from the existing and proposed installation of 1 x 900 MT capacity LPG mounded storage vessel. The objective of EMP is to identify the project specific environmental actions that will need to be undertaken, not only to mitigate impacts but also improve environmental aesthetics for the proposed expansion of at IOCL Pattikalan-Rampur LPG bottling Plant, by installation of one mounded vessel of 900 MT capacity. Environmental protection and improvement measures must be taken at design stage itself so as to minimize impacts during construction & operation phase of augmented facilities. The impacts during the construction phase on the environment would be basically of transient nature and are expected to reduce gradually on completion of the construction activities. The Environment Management Plan (EMP) during the construction and operation phase endeavours to mitigate the adverse impacts and to encourage the positive benefits.

9.2 Physical Environment

9.2.1. Soil

At the IOCL Pattikalan-Rampur LPG Plant, necessary mitigation measures will be taken to protect soil from contamination. All the construction derbis, metal cuttings and other construction wastes will be collected and disposed suitably as soon as construction is over. Solid waste collection bins will be placed at the site. Housekeeping at construction site will be maintaining properly. During operation phase, housekeeping and cleanliness at LPG plant will be maintained properly. Approx 24 kg day municipal wastes (paper plastic, food wastes, etc) will be generated, which will be collected and segregated. Recyclable wastes like paper and plastic wastes will be sent for recycling. Biodegradable wastes like food and vegetable wastes will be disposed compost pit. Non- biodegradable and non- recyclable wastes will be sent to common landfill site. From the maintenance of DG sets, 540 litres used oil is generated, which is categorized as hazardous wastes and handed over to Uttar Pradesh Pollution Control Board (UPPCB) or MoEF&CC authorized used oil recyclers.

9.2.2 Water Quality

During construction phase, small quantity of sewage will be generated by construction



labourers at the site. This impact will be temporary in the nature and restricted to the construction site only. Proper sanitation facilities will be provided to construction labourers at the site during construction phase. To avoid high turbidity in runoff, excavation of foundations for mounded vessel will be carried out during dry season. Construction debris will be collected and disposed properly daily basis. Sanitary facilities for workers will be provided. During operation phase, the LPG Bottling plant does not generate any process effluents. Domestic wastewater is generated at the LPG Plant, which is treated in septic tank followed by soak pit. The wastewater management philosophy will be based on “Zero Discharge” concept. Waste water from canteen at the LPG Plant will be treated in oil and grease trap followed by septic tank and soak pit.

9.2.3 Meteorology

The meteorology of the area is not likely to be affected during installation of the LPG mounded vessel and operation phase of the Pattikalan LPG Plant. Therefore, no management plan will be required.

9.2.4 Air Environment

During construction phase, a certain amount of dust and gaseous emissions will be generated due to vehicular movement and construction equipment at construction of the mounded vessel at Pattikalan Rampur LPG bottling plant. This will marginally deteriorate the ambient air quality of the site but the effect will be of temporary nature and will be diminished once construction work is over. Nonetheless, necessary precautions shall be adopted to check this problem. For reduction of dust generation at the site, dust suppression by means of water sprinkling will be followed during construction phase. Some amount of gaseous emissions is also anticipated during the welding of metal sheets during the fabrication of mounded vessel at the site. These emissions will be dispersed in to atmosphere within the short distance from fabrication activities. Further, welders will be provided with suitable personnel protective equipments to protect them from the toxic welding fumes. During operation phase, there will not be any source of air emission from one mounded vessel. DG Sets will be used in case of power failure for operation of equipment, control systems and safety equipment. As the DG sets will operate for a shorter duration, impact of stack emissions will be minimal. However, to control excess emissions from DG sets, periodical maintenance schedule provided by manufacturer shall be strictly adhered to. A proper operation of DG sets as per Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) will check generation of excess emissions. Emissions from DG sets are discharged into the atmosphere through an exhaust vent of appropriate height as per the guideline of Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB).



At Pattikalan Rampur LPG Bottling Plant, small quantity of fugitive emissions of hydrocarbon vapours may find its way into atmosphere through valves, flanges, joints LPG piping and during bottling. These emissions are expected to disperse into atmosphere soon after it comes out and the relevant impact on environment shall be short term. Hydrocarbon detectors have been placed at strategic locations to monitor the concentration of hydrocarbon with in LPG plant.

9.2.5 Solid Waste Management

During the construction of the mounded vessel at Pattikalan LPG bottling plant, solid waste materials, such as excess excavated earth, construction debris and metal chippings will be generated. These materials shall be cleared from the site and disposed suitably. During the operation phase, about 24 kg per day municipal wastes is generated from administrative building and canteen, which is disposed off after segregation for recycling and composting. Non bio-degradable and no recyclable wastes are sent for common land fill site.

9.2.6 Noise

During construction phase of the 1 x 900 MT capacity LPG mounded vessel within the Pattikalan LPG plant, noise generation is anticipated during the operation of construction equipment, vehicular movement, fabrication, erection and commissioning, etc. The mitigation measures for construction phase are given below:

Rotating equipment used in construction activities will be maintained well and strictly conform to noise generation standards.

Vehicles and equipment used at construction site will be fitted with silencer and maintained accordingly.

Noise standards for industrial enterprises will be enforced to protect construction workers from adverse noise impacts.

DG sets are already fitted with acoustic enclosures.

Workers engaged in high noise area have been provided with appropriate ear muffs/plugs.

Noise level will be monitored during the construction phase as mentioned in the environmental monitoring plan.

Continuous generation of noise is not expected due to operation of the IOCL Pattikalan LPG Bottling plant including installation of the mounded vessel. Equipment specifications and installation of dampers/ silencers for DG sets will ensure that noise level from the operation of DG sets during grid power failure does not exceed 70 dB (A) at 1 m distance as these are fitted with acoustic enclosure. Development of 10.97 Acres of green belt already around the LPG Plant will further attenuate the noise levels as a result of the operation of DG sets during power failure.



9.3 Green Belt

9.3.1 Terrestrial Ecology

Tree plantation is known for improving the aesthetic and climatological environment of an area and properly designed green belt can help in ameliorating air pollution to a very significant degree. Green belt also acts as green lung which greatly helps improving the air quality of the area. 9.3.2 Green Belt Development The main objective of the green belt is to provide a barrier between the sources of pollution and the surrounding areas. A green belt helps to capture the fugitive emissions and to attenuate the noise generated at site apart from improving the aesthetics. This will also check soil erosion and make the ecosystem more diverse. At the plant, the green belt has been developed on 10.97 Acres area. Existing green belt will be strengthened after expansion. This will have positive impact on ecology of the area.

9.4 Socio-economic Environment

During the construction and operation phase, about 100 workers may get direct and indirect employment opportunity, while 20 workers will employed during the operational phase. which will have positive impact on local area. The following suggestions are given below to strengthen the beneficial impacts on the socio-economic conditions:

Local people shall be given preference for employment.

All the applicable guidelines under relevant acts and rules related to labour welfare and safety shall be implemented during the construction work and operation activities.

9.5 Rain Water Harvesting

IOCL Pattikalan LPG bottling Plant is spread across 33.25 Acres of land. Rain water harvesting have been provided in non contaminated area.

9.6 Environmental Management Cell

Existing LPG bottling plant of IOCL have full-fledge health, Safety, Security and environment (HSSE) cell at corporate level to take care of any environmental issue at its LPG plant. It is suggested that IOCL should designate one of its official for implementation of EMP during construction of proposed installation of one mounded vessel. This official will be responsible for day-to-day environmental affairs including implementing monitoring programme.

9.7 Environmental Training

To achieve the objective of pollution control, it is essential not only to provide best pollution control system but also to provide trained manpower resources to operate the same. The regular in-house training programme should cover the following:



Awareness of pollution control and environmental protection.

Knowledge of norms, regulations and procedures.

Occupational health and safety at IOCL Pattikalan LPG Plant.

Fire fighting facilities for LPG Plant

9.8 Reporting And Monitoring System

Proper reporting of implementation of mitigation measures plays important role in effective environmental management. The reporting system will provide the necessary feedback for project management to ensure proper quality of the work and that the environmental management programmes are on schedule. The rationale for a reporting system is based on accountability to ensure that the mitigation measures proposed as part of the Environmental Management Plan gets implemented during construction of one mounded vessel and operation phases of the expansion of Pattikalan LPG Plant. The reporting system will operate linearly with the person who is at the lowest level of the implementation system to the project management and shall report to Territory Manager of Pattikalan-Rampur LPG bottling Plant of IOCL. For the proposed expansion of the LPG Plant of IOCL by installation of 1 x 900 MT capacity mounded vessel, all reporting to the Territory Manager of IOCL will be on weekly basis. The IOCL’s Environmental Management Cell will be responsible for preparing targets for each of the identified mitigation measures. The compliance monitoring and the progress reports on environmental components may be clubbed together and submitted to the Territory Manager IOCL weekly during each phase of implementation period. At the end of implementation, weekly progress report on environmental issues may be discontinued. During the construction period, a compliance report may include description of the items of mitigation measures, which were not complied by any of the responsible agencies. It would also report the management actions taken to enforce compliance. It may however, be noted that certain items of the EMP might not be possible to be compiled at the field level due to a variety of reasons. The intention of the compliance report is not to suppress these issues but to bring out the circumstances and reasons for which compliance was not possible. This would help in rationalizing the implementation of the mitigation measures during the remaining duration of implementation. Solutions for further effective implementation would also come out as a result of the compliance monitoring reports. Photographic records will also be established to provide useful environmental monitoring tools. A full record will be kept as part of normal contract monitoring.

9.9 Budgets For Implementation of EMP And Monitoring Plan

The budget for implementation of mitigation measures and environmental management plan to mitigate the potential adverse environmental impacts during operation phase are suggested in Table 9.2.



Table 9.2 Budget for Implementation of EMP and Monitoring Plan

S. No.

Description (Cost in Lakh Rupees)

Capital Cost

Recurring Cost Per Annum

1 Green Belt / Horticulture 12.0 6.0

2 Rain Water Harvesting 8.0 1.0

3 Water management 10.0 2.0

4 Signage’s for EMP 3.0 0.5

5 Municipal Waste Management 2.0 0.5

6 Noise Control Measures 1.0 0.5

7 Environmental Monitoring 1.5 3.5

8 Environmental Awareness and Training

0.0 2.0

Total 37.5 16

9.10 Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

Indian Oil has increased the contribution towards CSR activities with time. The budget for CSR has gradually increased from 0.5% of previous year’s Net Profit (which was in place since 1991) to 2% of previous year’s Retained Profit (from 2009 onwards). With promulgation of Companies Act, 2013 and rules thereof, Indian Oil has aligned its CSR activities and polices as per the Act.

LPG availability to BPL people Installation of Toilets

CSR Activities carried out by IOCL: 1) LPG Scheme for BPL families 2) Swachh Bharat Abhiyaan 3) Swachh Vidyalaya Abhiyaan 4) Indian Oil Academic Scholarship Scheme 5) Indian Oil Sports Scholarship Scheme



CHAPTER 10:

DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANTS

10.1 Introduction

This chapter describes about the environmental consultant – “ABC Techno Labs India Private Limited” engaged in preparation of EIA report for expansion of existing Etawah LPG Plant of IOCL construction of two additional mounded vessels.

10.2 The Consultant: ABC Techno Labs

ABC Techno Labs India Private Limited (formerly ABC Environ Solutions Pvt. Ltd.) is an ISO 9001, ISO 14001 & OHSAS 18001 Certified Company & leading Environmental Engineering & Consultancy Company constantly striving towards newer heights since its inception in 2006. Our Company is dedicated to provide strategic services in the areas Environment, Infrastructure, Energy, Engineering and Multilab. It is the first firm to be accredited by NABET (National Accreditation Board for Education and Training), Quality Council of India, as an EIA Consultant, approved for carrying out EIA studies and obtaining environmental clearance for various sectors such as Thermal Power Plants, Infrastructure, Industrial Estates / Complexes/ Areas, Mining, Township & area development and Building construction projects etc. ABC Techno Labs is equipped with in-house, spacious laboratory, accredited by NABL (National Accreditation Board for Testing & Calibration Laboratories), Department of Science & Technology, Government of India. Since establishment ABC Techno Labs focus on sustainable development of Industry and Environment based on sound engineering practices, innovation, quality, R&D and most important is satisfying customers need. The company has successfully completed more than 100 projects of variety of industries, in the field of pollution control and environmental management solutions. The company is also dealing in the projects of waste minimization and cleaner production technology. The team of technocrats and scientist are well experienced to deal with the design, Manufacture, Fabrication, Installation, commissioning of Effluent/Wastewater treatment plants, Sewage Treatment plants, Combined Treatment plants. The company is having well experienced team of Scientists & Engineers who are looking after environmental projects & well equipped analytical laboratory with a facility including analysis of physical, chemical and biological parameters as per the requirements of the State Pollution Control Board and our clients.



10.3 Services of ABC Techno Labs India Private Limited

10.3.1 Environmental Services

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)

Environmental Management Plan (EMP)

Social Impact Assessment (SIA)

Environmental Baseline data collection for Air, Meteorology, Noise, Water, Soil, Ecology, Socio-Economic and Demography etc;

Environmental Monitoring

Socio Economic Studies

Resettlement & Rehabilitation Plan

Ecological & Human Health Risk Assessment Studies

Ecological Impact Assessment

Environmental Management Framework

Solid Waste Management

Hazardous Waste Management

Internship & Training

10.3.2 Turnkey Projects

Water Treatment Plants

Sewage Treatment Plant

Recycling & Water Conservation Systems

Zero Discharge System

10.3.3 Other Services

Operation & Maintenance of Water & Waste Water Plants

Water & Waste Water Treatment Chemicals

Pilot Plant studies

Feasibility studies & preparation of budgetary estimates

10.3.4 Laboratory Services

Chemical Testing

Environmental Testing

Microbiological Testing

Food Testing

Metallurgical Testing



10.4 Sectors Accredited by NABET (QCI)

“ABC Techno Labs India Private Limited” listed at Sr. No. 2 in List of Accredited EIA Consultant Organizations –169 (as on Nov. 05, 2015)

http://www.qcin.org/nabet/EIA/documents/Accredited%20consultants.pdf

10.5 Study Team for EIA Study

ABC Techno Labs India Private Limited has carried out this Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) study. The multidisciplinary team included expertise in Environmental Impact Assessment, Air & Water Pollution & Control measures, Noise Control measures, Ecology & bio-diversity, Land use, Geology, Environmental Chemistry and Socio-Economic planner. The team members involved in EIA study area:

S.No. Name of Expert Role

1 Mrs. Vijaylaxmi EIA coordinator, FAE - Air Quality Modelling &

Prediction

2 Dr. R.K. Jayaseelan FAE – Land use and Hydrogeology

3 Dr. Chaitanya Sathe FAE-Water Pollution & Solid and Hazardous

Waste

4 Dr. N. Sukumaran FAE-Ecology & Biodiversity



5 Dr.Thillai Govindarajan FAE – Geology

6 Mr. R. Rajendran FAE–Air Pollution, Prevention and Control and

Noise &Vibration

7 Mr. Sushil Meshram FAE – Socio-Economic Expert

8 Mr. Sameer Zope Team Member- Report Analysis and

Documentation

9 Ms. Divya Mistry Team Member- Report Analysis and

Documentation

10 Mr. Satyawan Upale Field technician

11 Mr. Sakharam Nare Field technician

* * * * * *

draft environmental impact assessment study report for...

Documents