Download - “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA
![Page 1: “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081801/56814fb3550346895dbd6ce6/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
“The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss
Trends”by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA
MAF Seminar
March 22, 2005
![Page 2: “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081801/56814fb3550346895dbd6ce6/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Why are loss trends important?
Loss trends are used to project the historical data to the future experience period so accurate loss costs will be reflected in the rates charged.
![Page 3: “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081801/56814fb3550346895dbd6ce6/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
How should data be organized for loss trends?
• Accident Year/Policy Year
Benefit
– Best matching of risk with exposure
Drawback
– Most recent years requires loss development
• Calendar Year
Benefit
– Ease of use
Drawback
– Mismatching risk with exposure
![Page 4: “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081801/56814fb3550346895dbd6ce6/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Calendar Year Loss Trends
Example Assumptions:• All policies are written on January 1st and are
12 month policies• The ultimate claim frequency for every risk in
existence is 0.20• 50% of the ultimate claims are paid within 12
months of the date the policy was written, 30% between 12 and 24 months, and 20% between 24 and 36 months (no claims paid past 36 months)
![Page 5: “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081801/56814fb3550346895dbd6ce6/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Calendar Year Loss Trends
Example Assumptions (cont.):• The claim payment pattern does not change
over time• During calendar year X+2, claims that were
paid within 12 months of the date the policy was written were settled for $100, $200 for claims between 12 to 24 months, and $400 for claims between 24 to 36 months
• Annual inflation is 5% for all claims
![Page 6: “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081801/56814fb3550346895dbd6ce6/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Calendar Year Loss Trends
Example Assumptions (cont.):Calendar Year Earned Exposures Change
X 100,000X+1 100,000 0.0%X+2 100,000 0.0%X+3 90,900 -9.1%X+4 78,500 -13.6%X+5 63,475 -19.1%X+6 48,575 -23.5%
![Page 7: “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081801/56814fb3550346895dbd6ce6/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Calendar Year Paid Frequency
CYX Paid Frequency = (C0,12,X + C12,24,X + …) / EX
Where:• CYX = Calendar year X
• CT,T + 12,X = # of claims paid during CYX that were paid between T and T + 12 months after the claim occurred
• EX = Earned Exposures from calendar year X
![Page 8: “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081801/56814fb3550346895dbd6ce6/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Calendar Year Paid Frequency
Year X + 2 = (100,000 * 0.2 * 0.5 + 100,000 * 0.2 * 0.3 + 100,000 * 0.2 * 0.2) / 100,000
= 0.2
Year X + 6 = (48,575 * 0.2 * 0.5 + 63,475 * 0.2 * 0.3 + 78,500 * 0.2 * 0.2) /
48,575
= 0.243
![Page 9: “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081801/56814fb3550346895dbd6ce6/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Calendar Year Paid Frequency Trend
Calendar Year Paid Frequency ChangeX+2 0.200X+3 0.210 5.0%X+4 0.220 5.0%X+5 0.231 5.0%X+6 0.243 5.0%
![Page 10: “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081801/56814fb3550346895dbd6ce6/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Why was there a trend???
There was a mismatch between the claims and exposures!
For example:Calendar Year X + 6 paid claims come from
Accident Years X + 4, X + 5, and X + 6 but are matched to Calendar Year X + 6 earned exposures
![Page 11: “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081801/56814fb3550346895dbd6ce6/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Will there always be an impact to paid frequency trends?
There are two factors that need to occur to see a distortion:
• Changing exposure levels
• Significant amount of time between accident date and settlement date
![Page 12: “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081801/56814fb3550346895dbd6ce6/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
CY Paid Pure Premium Trend
Since CY paid frequency trend is 5% and inflation is 5% we would expect the CY paid pure premium to about 10%.
Let’s take a look at CY paid pure premiums….
![Page 13: “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081801/56814fb3550346895dbd6ce6/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Calendar Year Paid Pure Premium
CYX Paid Pure Premium= (L0,12,X + L12,24,X + …) / EX
Where:• LT,T + 12,X = losses paid during CYX
that were paid between T and T + 12 months after the claim occurred
![Page 14: “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081801/56814fb3550346895dbd6ce6/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Calendar Year Paid Pure Premium
Year X + 2 = (100,000 * 0.2 * 0.5 *100 + 100,000 * 0.2 * 0.3 * 200 + 100,000 * 0.2 * 0.2 * 400) / 100,000
= $38.00
Year X + 6 = (48,575 * 0.2 * 0.5 * 100 * 1.05 4 + 63,475 * 0.2 * 0.3 * 200 * 1.05 4 + 78,500 * 0.2 * 0.2 * 400 * 1.05 4 ) / 48,575
= $62.42
![Page 15: “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081801/56814fb3550346895dbd6ce6/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Calendar Year Paid Pure Premium Trend
Calendar Year Pure Premium ChangeX+2 $38.00X+3 $42.84 12.7%X+4 $48.82 13.9%X+5 $55.28 13.2%X+6 $62.64 13.3%
![Page 16: “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081801/56814fb3550346895dbd6ce6/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
CY Paid Severity Trend
In this example we know that inflation is 5%, so we want a measure that will produce a 5% severity trend
Let’s take a look at CY paid severity….
![Page 17: “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081801/56814fb3550346895dbd6ce6/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Calendar Year Paid Severity
CYX Paid Severity= (S0,12,X * C0,12,X + S12,24,X * C12, 24,X + …) / (C0,12,X + C12,24,X + …)
Where:• ST,T + 12,X = losses paid during CYX that
were paid between T and T + 12 months after the claim occurred
![Page 18: “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081801/56814fb3550346895dbd6ce6/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Calendar Year Paid SeverityYear X + 2 = (100,000 * 0.2 * 0.5 *100 + 100,000 * 0.2
* 0.3 * 200 + 100,000 * 0.2 * 0.2 * 400) / (100,000 * 0.2 * 0.5 + 100,000 * 0.2 * 0.3 + 100,000 * 0.2 * 0.2)
= $190.00
Year X + 6 = (48,575 * 0.2 * 0.5 * 100 * 1.05 4 + 63,475 * 0.2 * 0.3 * 200 * 1.05 4 + 78,500 * 0.2 * 0.2 * 400 * 1.05 4 ) / (48,575 * 0.2 * 0.5 + 63,475 * 0.2 * 0.3 + 78,500 * 0.2 * 0.2)
= $257.75
![Page 19: “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081801/56814fb3550346895dbd6ce6/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Calendar Year Paid Severity Trend
Calendar Year Severity ChangeX+2 $190.00X+3 $204.00 7.4%X+4 $221.46 8.6%X+5 $238.81 7.8%X+6 $257.75 7.9%
![Page 20: “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081801/56814fb3550346895dbd6ce6/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Calendar Year Paid Severity
Calendar Year Paid Severity represents a weighted average of the severities from the different settlement periods where the weights are the percentage of total paid claims from that specific settlement period
![Page 21: “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081801/56814fb3550346895dbd6ce6/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
What Happened???
This example assumes uniform inflation of 5% annually, but the paid severity varies depending on how long it takes to settle the claim.
With the declining exposures, the percentage paid claims from the early settlement times decreases with respects to total paid claims.
![Page 22: “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081801/56814fb3550346895dbd6ce6/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Calendar Year Paid Severity Distribution by Settlement Period
% of Total Paid Claims Settled inCalendar Year 0-12 mths 12-24 mths 24-36 mths
X+2 50.0% 30.0% 20.0%X+3 47.6% 31.4% 21.0%X+4 45.4% 31.5% 23.1%X+5 43.2% 32.1% 24.7%X+6 41.1% 32.3% 26.6%
![Page 23: “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081801/56814fb3550346895dbd6ce6/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
What can you do to measure the correct paid frequency?
Calendar Year Paid Frequency was distorted by the mismatch between paid claims and exposures, why not match the paid claims to the exposures that produced them?
![Page 24: “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081801/56814fb3550346895dbd6ce6/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Adjusted Paid Frequency
Adjusted Paid Frequency (APF) = C0,12,X / EX + C12,24,X / EX-1 + C24,36,X / EX-2 + …
This formula can be thought of as adding the incremental frequencies
![Page 25: “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081801/56814fb3550346895dbd6ce6/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Adjusted Paid Frequency
Year X + 2 = 100,000 * 0.2 * 0.5 / 100,000 + 100,000 * 0.2 * 0.3 /100,000 + 100,000 * 0.2 * 0.2 / 100,000
= 0.2
Year X + 6 = 48,575 * 0.2 * 0.5 /48,575 + 63,475 * 0.2 * 0.3 / 63,475 + 78,500 * 0.2 * 0.2 / 78,500
= 0.2
![Page 26: “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081801/56814fb3550346895dbd6ce6/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Adjusted Paid Frequency Trend
AdjustedYear Paid Frequency ChangeX+2 0.200X+3 0.200 0.0%X+4 0.200 0.0%X+5 0.200 0.0%X+6 0.200 0.0%
![Page 27: “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081801/56814fb3550346895dbd6ce6/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
What about paid pure premium?
Calendar Year Paid Pure Premium is also distorted by the mismatch between paid claims and exposures, so a similar adjustment would seem warranted.
![Page 28: “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081801/56814fb3550346895dbd6ce6/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Adjusted Paid Pure Premium
Adjusted Paid Pure Premium (APPP) = L0,12,X / EX + L12,24,X / EX-1 + L24,36,X / EX-2 + …
This formula can be thought of as adding the incremental pure premiums
![Page 29: “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081801/56814fb3550346895dbd6ce6/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Adjusted Paid Pure Premium
Year X + 2 = 100,000 * 0.2 * 0.5 * 100 / 100,000 + 100,000 * 0.2 * 0.3 * 200 /100,000 + 100,000 * 0.2 * 0.2 * 400 / 100,000
= $38.00
Year X + 6 = 48,575 * 0.2 * 0.5 * 100 * 1.05 4/48,575 + 63,475 * 0.2 * 0.3 *200 * 1.05 4/ 63,475 + 78,500 * 0.2 * 0.2 * 400 * 1.05 4/ 78,500
= $46.19
![Page 30: “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081801/56814fb3550346895dbd6ce6/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Adjusted Paid Pure Premium Trend
AdjustedYear Pure Premium ChangeX+2 $38.00X+3 $39.90 5.0%X+4 $41.90 5.0%X+5 $43.99 5.0%X+6 $46.19 5.0%
![Page 31: “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081801/56814fb3550346895dbd6ce6/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
What about paid severity?
Since we have formulas for adjusted paid frequency and adjusted paid pure premium, the formula for paid severity can be backed into using the relationship of:
Frequency * Severity = Pure Premium
![Page 32: “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081801/56814fb3550346895dbd6ce6/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Adjusted Paid Severity
Adjusted Paid Severity (APS)= (L0,12,X / EX + L12,24,X / EX-1 + L24,36,X / EX-2 + … )/(APF)
= (L0,12,X / EX)/APF + (L12,24,X / EX-1)/APF + …
= ((L0,12,X / C0,12,X ) * (C0,12,X / EX))/APF + ((L12,24,X / C12,24,X ) * (C12,24,X / EX-1))/APF + …
= (S0,12,X * (C0,12,X / EX))/APF + (S12,24,X * (C12,24,X / EX-1))/APF + …
![Page 33: “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081801/56814fb3550346895dbd6ce6/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Adjusted Paid Severity
Adjusted Paid Severity represents a weighted average of the severities from the different settlement periods where the weights are the percentage of total paid frequency from that specific settlement period
![Page 34: “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081801/56814fb3550346895dbd6ce6/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Adjusted Paid Severity
You have a formula to derive adjusted paid severity, but you can use the same relationship used to derive that formula and just divide the Adjusted Paid Pure Premium by the Adjusted Paid Frequency.
![Page 35: “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081801/56814fb3550346895dbd6ce6/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Adjusted Paid Severity Trend
AdjustedYear Severity ChangeX+2 $190.00X+3 $199.50 5.0%X+4 $209.48 5.0%X+5 $219.95 5.0%X+6 $230.95 5.0%
![Page 36: “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081801/56814fb3550346895dbd6ce6/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Benefits of using Adjusted Loss Trends
• Adjusted loss trends remove the implicit assumption with CY loss trends that exposure levels are constant
• If exposure levels are constant, CY loss trends are equal to adjusted loss trends
• No development needed (issue w/ AY)• No issues with seasonality of reporting patterns,
plus adjustment is made for severity issues (issue w/ reported frequency)
![Page 37: “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081801/56814fb3550346895dbd6ce6/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Pitfalls or Issues to Watch for if using this method
#1• How many years to match claims/losses with
exposures?
– Claims can be paid many years after the accident occurred
– Not practical to match every accident year within a calendar year’s paid claim
– Recommend matching enough years where a “significant” portion of claims/losses have been paid (in PPA 8 years should be sufficient)
![Page 38: “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081801/56814fb3550346895dbd6ce6/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Pitfalls or Issues to Watch for if using this method (cont.)
#2• What to do with the claims/losses from the years
not match?– Recommend creating an “all others” accident year
category where all of the paid claims/losses are summed
– These “all others” paid claims/losses should then be matched to the calendar year exposures from the most recent year that falls in the “all others” group since this should be most representative of the exposure level of the claims/losses
![Page 39: “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081801/56814fb3550346895dbd6ce6/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Pitfalls or Issues to Watch for if using this method (cont.)
#3• Some older CY earned exposures could be very
small if company is relatively new, potentially causing unusual results– Ex. There might be 1 paid claim matched to 2 earned
exposures causing frequencies to look extremely high• Could remove incremental frequency that is distorted• Could match back to years w/ at least X exposures
– Actuarial judgment should be used as to what the appropriate action should be
![Page 40: “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081801/56814fb3550346895dbd6ce6/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Let’s take a look at some real examples…
![Page 41: “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081801/56814fb3550346895dbd6ce6/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Calendar Year Paid Freq TrendBodily Injury Coverage
6 pt.actual curve of
Date data best fit9/ 01 3.97 4.10712/ 01 4.61 4.5753/ 02 5.23 5.0966/ 02 5.79 5.6779/ 02 6.44 6.32512/ 02 6.78 7.046
REGRESSION 6 pt.
Avg Ann Trend = 54.02%
![Page 42: “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081801/56814fb3550346895dbd6ce6/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Adjusted Paid Freq TrendBodily Injury Coverage
6 pt.actual curve of
Date data best fit9/ 01 3.23 3.47112/ 01 3.54 3.5133/ 02 3.80 3.5566/ 02 3.80 3.6009/ 02 3.72 3.64312/ 02 3.41 3.688
REGRESSION 6 pt.
Avg Ann Trend = 4.96%
![Page 43: “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081801/56814fb3550346895dbd6ce6/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Calendar Year Paid Sev TrendBodily Injury Coverage
6 pt.actual curve of
Date data best fit9/ 01 10,691 10,96712/ 01 11,788 11,4353/ 02 11,707 11,9236/ 02 12,680 12,4319/ 02 13,228 12,96212/ 02 13,155 13,515
REGRESSION 6 pt.
Avg Ann Trend = 18.19%
![Page 44: “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081801/56814fb3550346895dbd6ce6/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Adjusted Paid Sev TrendBodily Injury Coverage
6 pt.actual curve of
Date data best fit9/ 01 10,228 10,59712/ 01 11,194 10,7823/ 02 10,800 10,9716/ 02 11,436 11,1639/ 02 11,654 11,35812/ 02 11,144 11,557
REGRESSION 6 pt.
Avg Ann Trend = 7.18%
![Page 45: “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081801/56814fb3550346895dbd6ce6/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
CY Paid Pure Premium TrendBodily Injury Coverage
6 pt.actual curve of
Date data best fit9/ 01 424 45012/ 01 544 5233/ 02 612 6086/ 02 734 7069/ 02 852 82012/ 02 892 952
REGRESSION 6 pt.
Avg Ann Trend = 82.04%
![Page 46: “The Effect of Changing Exposure Levels on Calendar Year Loss Trends” by Chris Styrsky, FCAS, MAAA](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081801/56814fb3550346895dbd6ce6/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Adjusted Paid Pure Premium Trend
Bodily Injury Coverage
6 pt.actual curve of
Date data best fit9/ 01 330 36812/ 01 397 3793/ 02 410 3906/ 02 434 4029/ 02 434 41412/ 02 380 426
REGRESSION 6 pt.
Avg Ann Trend = 12.51%