Download - Stephen Dick
![Page 1: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
![Page 2: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Steel Railway Bridge Fatigue and the Evolution of Railway Car Loadings
The Current State and Future Challenges
of Railway Bridges
Stephen M. Dick, PE, SE, Ph.D.
Hanson Professional Services
![Page 3: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Discussion Items
General bridge features
Railroad car loadings
Steel bridge fatigue
![Page 4: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
General Bridge Features
![Page 5: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Common Features
• Simply supported– “Time is money”
• repairs are easier• historical precedent
• Standardized designs– applicable to any type of span
• steel and timber both standardized• prestressed concrete very popular
– standardization creates economies
![Page 6: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Historical Bridge Types(1890 forward)
• Steel – rolled multiple beams (up to 30 feet)– built-up girders (up to 120 – 150 feet)– trusses (longer than 150 feet)
• pin trusses popular early• riveted (now bolted) trusses• welding also used
![Page 7: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Historical Bridge Types(1890 forward)
• Steel – riveted and bolted construction
– rivets common until the 1960’s– bolting used for repairs on existing bridges– bolting still used extensively
• truss and girder field erection• potential fatigue locations
![Page 8: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Historical Bridge Types(1890 forward)
• Steel – welded construction
– became generally used in the late 1950’s– used in both girders and trusses– restrictions on details because of fatigue
![Page 9: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Historical Bridge Types(1890 forward)
• Timber– used extensively for trestle bridges– span lengths 10 – 15 feet– used for ballast decks on steel bridges– timber’s use is declining
• insufficient load capacity for heavier loadings• supplies of useful timber are declining• creosote treatment has environmental issues
![Page 10: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Historical Bridge Types(1890 forward)
• Timber– glulam and hybrid construction is in place for
test bridges.– results are mixed
![Page 11: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Historical Bridge Types(1890 forward)
• Reinforced Concrete– used since early in 20th century– used early for arch and box culverts– popular in urban areas for grade separations– substructures– used for large arches and viaducts in various
locations
![Page 12: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Historical Bridge Types(1890 forward)
• Prestressed Concrete– used heavily in railroad industry– replacing timber in trestle construction– precasting allows faster field construction– standardized spans up to ~ 50 feet– Span length limited to ~ 80 – 100 feet
![Page 13: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Historical Bridge Types(1890 forward)
• Foundations– stone abutments and piers still in use– older concrete
• many are rubble-filled• unreinforced concrete• Gravity design without pile foundations
– newer concrete• rely on pilings or drilled shafts• heavy use of steel H-piling
![Page 14: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Future trends
• Not really set
• Refinement of existing technologies
• Modern materials have potential– durability issues– cost
![Page 15: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Design parameters
• AREMA Manual – Timber – Chapter 7– Concrete – Chapter 8– Steel – Chapter 15– Seismic – Chapter 9– Bridge Maintenance – Chapter 10
![Page 16: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Cooper E80 Design Loading
![Page 17: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Cooper E80 Loading
• Loading still used despite its age (1894)
• Still provides adequate overall moments for both short and long spans
• Scaleable
• Not entirely satisfactory as a basis for fatigue checks
![Page 18: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Nor
mal
ized
Ben
ding
Mom
ent
8080 1001006060 120120 140140 15015013013011011090907070
1920 Cooper E60
Span Length (ft)
505040403030
2004 Cooper E80
1900 Cooper E40
Design Moments Normalized for Allowable Stresses
![Page 19: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Railway Car Loadings
![Page 20: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Actual Loadings
• Steady increases over time
• Total volume increasing dramatically
• Coal– 1900 ~ 3,000 pounds per foot– 2000 ~ 5,400 pounds per foot
![Page 21: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Actual LoadingsImportant milestone dates
• 1928 - Wood underframes outlawed
• 1941 - Arch bar trucks outlawed
• 1968 - Roller bearings required
Requirements for interchange only
![Page 22: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Actual LoadingsPre-1940
• Car loads from 30 tons (1900) up to 70 tons (1930)
• Majority of car fleet length 40 feet or less
• Very few freight cars exceeding 60 feet
• Passenger cars often the heaviest cars
![Page 23: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Actual Loadings1940-1960
• Car loads from 70 tons (1940) up to 90 tons (1960)
• Majority of car fleet length 40 feet or less
• Longer car lengths introduced (90 feet)
• Development of railcars for specific commodities beginning
![Page 24: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
Actual LoadingsPost-1960
• Car loads from 90 tons (1960) up to 110 tons (1995)
• Wide variety of car lengths available for commodity specialization
• Long car lengths very common
• Car weights increasing in general because of specialization of car equipment
![Page 25: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
Actual LoadingsTotal Tonnages
• Tonnage during World War II was highest for the first half-century– three to four times the traffic during Great
Depression
• Traffic levels not repeated until 1980’s
• Traffic continuing to increase to historic levels
![Page 26: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
Actual LoadingsUnit Train Weights
• 1930’s – 1500 to 3300 plf
• 1950’s – 1200 to 3200 plf
• Empty weight – 1200 plf– consistent over time
![Page 27: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
Actual LoadingsUnit Train Weights
2004 data
• Manifest – 1500 to 4600 plf
• Grain – 4700 to 5000 plf
• Coal – 5400 plf
• Automobile – 1500 to 2200 plf
• TOFC – 1200 to 2100 plf
• Double Stack – 1300 to 2600 plf– empty: assume 900 plf for TOFC/DS/Auto
![Page 28: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
Steel Railway Bridge Fatigue
![Page 29: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
Steel Railway Bridge Fatigue
• Number of old steel railway bridges is still very high
• Increased traffic levels on fewer routes are increasing the number of potential cycles
• Increased axle weights are creating higher bending moments and cycle potential
![Page 30: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
Steel Railway Bridge Fatigue
• Multiple cycles are potentially damaging from a train
• Need to examine the potential for all cycles that can occur
• Maximum moment – one overall cycle
• Moment range – one cycle per car
![Page 31: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
Moment Trace for a Unit Coal Train on a 50-foot Span.
Time
Ben
ding
Mom
entCarsLocomotives Midspan
Quarter Point
![Page 32: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32
Mom
ent R
ange
(k-
ft)
Span Position (x/L)
Moment Range versus Span Position on 50-Foot Span
0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Coal Car
Locomotive
![Page 33: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33
Moment Trace for a Unit Coal Train on a 100-foot Span.
Time
Ben
ding
Mom
ent
CarsLocomotives
Midspan
Quarter Point
![Page 34: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34
Mom
ent R
ange
(k-
ft)
Span Position (x/L)
Moment Range versus Span Position on for 100-Foot Span
0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Coal Car
Locomotive
![Page 35: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
35
LO
LO - Overall length of railroad car measured over the pulling face of the coupler.TC - Length between the center pin on the trucks, known as the truck center distance.SI - Inboard Axle Spacing, the distance between the inside axles of the railroad car.
TC
LO
TC
SO - Outboard Axle Spacing, the distance between the outside axles of the railroad car.ST - Truck Axle Spacing, the distance between the adjacent axles of a truck.n - number of axlesP - axle load
ST ST ST STSO/2 SO/2SI SO SI
![Page 36: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
36
Mom
ent R
ange
(k-
ft)
Span Position (x/L)
Moment Range versus Span Position on for LS/LO = 1.0
0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Locomotive
Coal Car
![Page 37: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
37
Mom
ent R
ange
(k-
ft)
Span Position (x/L)
Moment Range versus Span Position on for LS/LO = 2.0
0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Locomotive
Coal Car
![Page 38: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
38
Influence Lines For Moment Behavior At Midspan And Quarter Point
Influence Line for LS = 2LO at Midspan
Influence Line for LS = 4LO at Quarter Point
3LOLO
43
41
X
LOLO
21
X2
1
![Page 39: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
39
Moment Range
General Characteristics
• Cyclical in nature
• Possesses an absolute maximum
• Magnitude can be estimated for integer values of LS/LO using a similar sine wave approximation
![Page 40: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
40
Moment Range
Absolute Maximum Moment Range
o
ooIAM L
SSSnPR
44–
4
2
![Page 41: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
41
Equipment Overall LS/ LO LS/ LO
Type Length 30' span 150' spanSD70 70.00 0.43 2.14Coal 53.00 0.57 2.83
TOFC 94.00 0.32 1.60SPDS 71.00 0.42 2.11
APDS - End 65.26 0.46 2.30APDS - Middle 58.83 0.51 2.55
![Page 42: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
42
Mom
ent R
ange
(ki
p-ft
)
100
60
Span Position (x/L)
0.1 0.20 0.3 0.4 0.5
20
0
40
80
TOFC Car
Coal Car
Six Axle Locomotive
Maximum Moment vs. Span Position – 80 ft. span
![Page 43: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
43
50
30
Mom
ent R
ange
(ki
p-ft
)
Span Position (x/L)
0.1 0.2
Moment Range vs. Span Position – 80 ft. span
0 0.3 0.4 0.5
10
0
20
40 TOFC Car
Coal Car
Six Axle Locomotive
![Page 44: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
44
Ben
din
g M
om
ent
FIGURE 4. Bending Moment Versus Time For Railcar Loadings Over Long-Span Bridges
Time
Loaded Cars Only
Loaded and Unloaded Cars
Moment Trace for Mixed Empty/Loaded Railcars
![Page 45: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
45
Steel Railway Bridge Fatigue
• Need to “sharpen the pencil” for the number of cycles to expect from each type of train
• Need for quicker calculation of moment range magnitudes other than absolute maximum
![Page 46: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
46
Additional Research
• Consideration of R ratio in fatigue life calculations for riveted/bolted members
• Development of very long life fatigue coefficients for riveted members (over 100,000,000 cycles)
• Retrofit strategies that are economical and can take full advantage of bridge members if only details are problematic
![Page 47: Stephen Dick](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061112/5456e7bdb1af9ff5168b497e/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
47