Transcript
Page 1: Searches for H→bb at DØ

Searches for H→bb at DØSatish Desai - Fermilab

on behalf of the DØ Collaboration

36th International Conference on High Energy PhysicsMelbourne, Australia, 2012

Page 2: Searches for H→bb at DØ

2

As of Last Week

MH < 152 GeV (indirect constraints)

122 < MH < 127 GeV (searches)

Page 3: Searches for H→bb at DØ

3

The Search Strategy

Main Decay: H→bb

Page 4: Searches for H→bb at DØ

4

The Search Strategy

W+jets backgrounds even worse at LHC:

Sensitivity at H→γγ/ZZ

Main Decay: H→bb

Page 5: Searches for H→bb at DØ

5

The Search Strategy

W+jets backgrounds even worse at LHC:

Sensitivity at H→γγ/ZZ

Tevatron can still make important contributions for

H→bb

Main Decay: H→bb

Page 6: Searches for H→bb at DØ

6

Search Ingredients

• Maximize acceptance and efficiency

• Efficient b-tagging

• Split into subsamples with different purities

• Multivariate Techniques

llbb

lνbb

ννbb

Page 7: Searches for H→bb at DØ

7

Increasing Acceptance

WH Analysis

llbb Analysis

Expanded event selection

5-6% acceptanceincrease for WH→μνbb

6% acceptance increase for ZH→llbb

Page 8: Searches for H→bb at DØ

8

More b-tagging Categories

Primary Collision

Decay Vertex

Displayed Track

S/BS/B

Tight One Tag 1/1600

Loose Two Tag 1/1400

Medium Two Tag 1/360

Tight Two Tag 1/200

WH Analysis

Page 9: Searches for H→bb at DØ

9

More b-tagging Categories

Primary Collision

Decay Vertex

Displayed Track

S/BS/B

Tight One Tag 1/1600

Loose Two Tag 1/1400

Medium Two Tag 1/360

Tight Two Tag 1/200

WH AnalysisSwitch from 3→4 b-tag categories

Sensitivity Gain: 4-5%

Page 10: Searches for H→bb at DØ

10

Targeting Top

Remove 45% of background

Keep 94% of signal

llbb Analysis

Still used asextra sample

7-8% improvementin sensitivity

Page 11: Searches for H→bb at DØ

11

Multivariate Techniques

vvbb Analysis

Add new variables

Improved training procedures

Sensitivity Improvements:4-5% for lvbb 10% for vvbb

vvbb Analysis

WH Analysis

More optimal

Page 12: Searches for H→bb at DØ

12

Validation with Dibosons

Search for WZ/ZZ→X+bb

Same final state asWH/ZH→X+bb searches

Cross section is five times larger

Use same search strategy:Same event selection

Same multivariate discriminants

Same statistical analysis tools

Seeing this signal is a crucialtest of analysis techniques

See talk by B. Penning

DØ only combinationSignificance: 3.3σ

Tevatron combinationSignificance: 4.6σ

Cross section:Measure: 4.5±0.6±0.7 pb

Theory: 4.4±0.3 pb

Page 13: Searches for H→bb at DØ

13

Results

Limits at MH=115 GeVExp: 1.58×σSM

Obs: 1.96×σSM

Limits at MH=125 GeVExp: 2.25×σSM

Obs: 3.30×σSM

Overall sensitivityimproves by 10-15%

Page 14: Searches for H→bb at DØ

14

The Log Likelihood RatioTest statistic used for CLs Method

Log likelihood ratio acts like Δχ2 of fits to

models

Based on Poisson likelihoods for two

hypotheses:signal+background

background only

Separation between

points acts like Δχ2

of fits to models

Observed

Signal+Background

Background

Page 15: Searches for H→bb at DØ

15

Summary

• Tevatron sensitivity to H→bb complements LHC results

• Evidence for VZ→X+bb used as a proving ground for H→bb search

• Modest excess for MH>120 GeV

• See additional Tevatron Higgs talks at this conference

• Finalizing results now

http://www-d0.fnal.gov/Run2Physics/WWW/results/higgs.htm

Page 16: Searches for H→bb at DØ

16

Page 17: Searches for H→bb at DØ

17

Searching through the years

2008

2009

2007 2010

2011

Spring 2012

Page 18: Searches for H→bb at DØ

18

Results for ZH→ννbb

Page 19: Searches for H→bb at DØ

19

Results for ZH→llbb

Page 20: Searches for H→bb at DØ

20

Results for WH→lνbb

Page 21: Searches for H→bb at DØ

21

S/B Distributions

Spring 2012

Spring 2012 Summer 2012

Summer 2012

Page 22: Searches for H→bb at DØ

22

Accumulated Signal

Spring 2012

Spring 2012 Summer 2012

Summer 2012


Top Related