Download - RTM 2014 ECONOMICS OF POWER AND STEAM
![Page 1: RTM 2014 ECONOMICS OF POWER AND STEAM](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58edd48e1a28ab3e668b45fd/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
ECONOMICS OF POWER & STEAMS
KARTHICK RSENIOR ENGINEER, ONGC-MRPL
14-11-2014
![Page 2: RTM 2014 ECONOMICS OF POWER AND STEAM](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58edd48e1a28ab3e668b45fd/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
INTRODUCTION
In refinery complex, Steam Turbine Generators (STG) or Gas Turbine Generators (GTG) – cogeneration - steam levels and power. Relative efficiencies of equipments - vary inherently to capacity utilization - may have different generation costs at different loads In this paper: • Modelling of CPP including STGs and GTGs • Marginal values - calculated and presented• Gain understanding about optimal loading of
power plants
![Page 3: RTM 2014 ECONOMICS OF POWER AND STEAM](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58edd48e1a28ab3e668b45fd/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
UTILITY – AVERAGE PRICING (1/2)• The common energy sources in a refinery complex are fuel, steam and power.• Standard Refinery Fuel (SRF) as a relative scale of energy consumption for secondary sources of energy such as steam and power.
•Steam and power - total quantity generation per ton of SRF consumption.
![Page 4: RTM 2014 ECONOMICS OF POWER AND STEAM](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58edd48e1a28ab3e668b45fd/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
UTILITY – AVERAGE PRICING (2/2)Power SRF factor: The total fuel consumed in the cogeneration system is apportioned for steam & power part.
Utility SRF factor
HP Steam 14.4MP Steam 15.2LP Steam 17.1Power 3.3
![Page 5: RTM 2014 ECONOMICS OF POWER AND STEAM](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58edd48e1a28ab3e668b45fd/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
STATISTICAL MODELING OFBOILER – STG SYSTEM
![Page 6: RTM 2014 ECONOMICS OF POWER AND STEAM](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58edd48e1a28ab3e668b45fd/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
HP STEAM HEATER
BOILER – STG SYSTEM SCHEMATIC
STEAM TURBINE
DEAERATOR
POWER EXPORT
TOTAL CONDENSERBFW
MAKE UP LP STEAM
HP STEAM
HP STEAM EXPORT
LP STEAM EXPORT
![Page 7: RTM 2014 ECONOMICS OF POWER AND STEAM](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58edd48e1a28ab3e668b45fd/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
STATISTICAL MODELLING - STG• Marginal steam generation -regression of actual data, fixing -2 as intercept, to account radiation losses = 16.24 per MT LSHS
• Marginal SHP steam production – regression model:
• To begin with, marginal SHP steam cost = LSHS cost/16.24
• Iterated with STG model’s LP and HP steam production cost till convergence
Regression model for STG hence arrived is,SHP Steam = 3.44 * Power + 0.75* HPS +0.42 * LPS + 15.43
![Page 8: RTM 2014 ECONOMICS OF POWER AND STEAM](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58edd48e1a28ab3e668b45fd/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
STG: MARGINAL PRICINGUTILITY
MARGINAL VALUE DEFINITION
MARGINAL VALUE
MARGINAL PRICE
POWER 3.44 SHP PRICE * POWER MARGINAL VALUE
HP STEAM
0.75 SHP PRICE * HP MARGINAL VALUE
LP STEAM
0.42 SHP PRICE * LP MARGINAL VALUE
MP STEAM
0.71
0.47
RESPECTIVE STEAM MARGINAL VALUE / RESPECTIVE ENTHALPHY RATIOS
POWERSHP
HPsteamSHP
LPsteamSHP
PRDSMPSHPMPsteamSHP
__
PRDSMPSHPMPsteamSHP
__
![Page 9: RTM 2014 ECONOMICS OF POWER AND STEAM](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58edd48e1a28ab3e668b45fd/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
MARGINAL VALUE: ACTUAL VS MODEL (1/2)ACTUAL DISTRIBUTION MODEL PREDICTION
![Page 10: RTM 2014 ECONOMICS OF POWER AND STEAM](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58edd48e1a28ab3e668b45fd/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
MARGINAL VALUE: ACTUAL VS MODEL (2/2)ACTUAL DISTRIBUTION MODEL PREDICTION
![Page 11: RTM 2014 ECONOMICS OF POWER AND STEAM](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58edd48e1a28ab3e668b45fd/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
STG: TYPICAL MARGINAL PRICESASSUMPTION: IFO (LSHS) COST = 38000
INR/MT
NO OF ITERATIONS FOR CONVERGENCE = 7
UTILITY COST UNIT SPECIFIC GENERATION
W.R.T IFOSHP STEAM 2566 RS/MT 14.8POWER 1924 RS/MW 4.3HP STEAM 1815 RS/MT 19.7MP STEAM (HP TO MP PRDS)
1142 RS/MT 20.9
MP STEAM (MP TO LP PRDS)
1078 RS/MT 33.3
LP STEAM 8825 RS/MT 35.3
![Page 12: RTM 2014 ECONOMICS OF POWER AND STEAM](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58edd48e1a28ab3e668b45fd/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
STATISTICAL MODELING OFGTG AND HRSG SYSTEM
![Page 13: RTM 2014 ECONOMICS OF POWER AND STEAM](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58edd48e1a28ab3e668b45fd/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
STATISTICAL MODELLING – GTG & HRSG• GT- HRSG system: Marginal power from GT & marginal steam from HRSG; Marginal fuel variation independent
Data – taken from GT performance curve and modeled by regression
• GT model: Operable range: GT Fuel = 0.2528* Power Load +1.7Startup range: GT Fuel = 0.2145* Power Load +2.1Where, GT Fuel (TPH), Power Load (MWh)
• HRSG model: fa = 0.0759*Steam Load -0.9387*[fp*LHV of fp – P*3600/4.187)Where, fa =HRSG Fuel (TPH), fp = GT Fuel (TPH), P= GT Power Load (MWh)
![Page 14: RTM 2014 ECONOMICS OF POWER AND STEAM](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58edd48e1a28ab3e668b45fd/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
GTG & HRSG: MARGINAL PRICINGUTILITY
MARGINAL VALUE DEFINITION
MARGINAL VALUE
MARGINAL COST
POWER 0.2528 GT FUEL COST * POWER MARGINAL VALUE
SHP STEAM
0.0759 HRSG FUEL COST * SHPS MARGINAL VALUE
Pf p
SHPfa
• Specific power generation = 1/Power Marginal value = 1/0.2528 ~3.96 MWh/Fuel TPH (operable range)
• |||ly Specific power generation ~4.3 MWh/Fuel TPH ( for startup)
•Specific steam generation = 1/Steam Marginal value ~13.18
![Page 15: RTM 2014 ECONOMICS OF POWER AND STEAM](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58edd48e1a28ab3e668b45fd/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION (1/2)Hypothetical modification schemes with change
in steam
Assumption: IFO (LSHS) Cost = 38000 INR/MT
IMPACT ON STEAM DUE
TO MODIFICATIO
N
STEAM QUANTI
TY (TPH)
OPERATION
EXPENSE / SAVINGS ( INR/ANNUM)
MARGINAL COSTING
AVERAGE COSTING
MP STEAM CONSERVATION
+2 Via reduction in MP to LP letdown
+3.8 LACS +17.6 LACS
MP STEAM CONSUMPTION
-2 Via reduction in HP to MP letdown
-6.1 LACS -17.6 LACS
LP STEAM CONSUMPTION
-3 Via STG extraction
-10.77 LACS -22.1 LACS
![Page 16: RTM 2014 ECONOMICS OF POWER AND STEAM](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58edd48e1a28ab3e668b45fd/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION (2/2) Marginal costing brings out realistic economics
for change in steam generation or consumption relative to average pricing which is static
GT power marginal value in startup range is 4.66 MWH/Fuel TPH.
The operable range GT marginal value 3.96 MWH/Fuel TPH
STGs have almost the same marginal value (4.3 MWH/ Fuel TPH) for startup and operable range
For relative plant power load dynamics, it is better to vary the power generation from STGs
![Page 17: RTM 2014 ECONOMICS OF POWER AND STEAM](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58edd48e1a28ab3e668b45fd/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
SUMMARY• Marginal costing accounts for process and equipment efficiency for generating the additional utility • Marginal costing of utilities gives realistic economics of steam conservation or consumption from base levels.•Statistical modeling & marginal values knowledge of power plants will help in optimal utilization of equipment loading for the cogeneration of steam & power• For combination of GTGs & STGs, GTG to run at maximum power generation mode and STG to take dynamic load variations
![Page 18: RTM 2014 ECONOMICS OF POWER AND STEAM](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051520/58edd48e1a28ab3e668b45fd/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
THANK YOU