![Page 1: Public - Private Partnerships and Solid Waste Management Infrastructure](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051513/54638621b1af9f2f538b459b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
04/08/23 1
PPPs & SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
INFRASTRUCTUREAntonis Mavropoulos, CEO EPEM SA
![Page 2: Public - Private Partnerships and Solid Waste Management Infrastructure](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051513/54638621b1af9f2f538b459b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Presentation outline
1. The problem
2. Key factors affecting PPPs in SWM
3. Changes in project preparation (design, risks, feasibility)
4. Case study
5. Conclusions
![Page 3: Public - Private Partnerships and Solid Waste Management Infrastructure](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051513/54638621b1af9f2f538b459b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
The view
PPPs are long term relations - emphasis at results
Private sector income is linked with specific targets
Payback is gradual, year by year
SWM services have a public character
One option not a necessity
![Page 4: Public - Private Partnerships and Solid Waste Management Infrastructure](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051513/54638621b1af9f2f538b459b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
The problem
To deliver WM infrastructure To ensure the service for certain years To achieve specific recycling targets To interact with market conditions and
other uncertainties
![Page 5: Public - Private Partnerships and Solid Waste Management Infrastructure](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051513/54638621b1af9f2f538b459b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Project cycle
![Page 6: Public - Private Partnerships and Solid Waste Management Infrastructure](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051513/54638621b1af9f2f538b459b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
PPP as a WM tool
![Page 7: Public - Private Partnerships and Solid Waste Management Infrastructure](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051513/54638621b1af9f2f538b459b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Key factors
1. Major EU financial tool
2. SWM treatment requirements: Directive 99/31
Difficulties for countries depended on landfills
Lack of public funds
3. The nature of SWM treatment facilities (technologies, complexity, industry dependence)
![Page 8: Public - Private Partnerships and Solid Waste Management Infrastructure](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051513/54638621b1af9f2f538b459b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
4. The status of managing bodies
5. Increase in WM costs
6. Legal gaps and problems
7. Need for a new public role: from control of
procedures to control of the results
![Page 9: Public - Private Partnerships and Solid Waste Management Infrastructure](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051513/54638621b1af9f2f538b459b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Key factors Effect
1. EU policy Positive
2. Availability of public money Positive
3. SWM treatment requirements Positive
4. SWM treatment facilities nature Positive
5. Managing bodies status Negative
6. Increase in WM costs Negative
7. Legal problems - gaps Negative
8. Public role Negative
![Page 10: Public - Private Partnerships and Solid Waste Management Infrastructure](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051513/54638621b1af9f2f538b459b/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
SWM treatment needs (Greece)
1,95
1,3
1,1
1,9
2,7
0,9
0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3
2010
2013
2020
Max.BMW to landfilled (mt) Min. BMW to be diverted (mt)
![Page 11: Public - Private Partnerships and Solid Waste Management Infrastructure](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051513/54638621b1af9f2f538b459b/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
A new approach to design
Check the overall feasibility Emphasis to results – not to technical
design Risk Distribution
![Page 12: Public - Private Partnerships and Solid Waste Management Infrastructure](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051513/54638621b1af9f2f538b459b/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Feasibility
Define the problem
Alternative funding
Affordability
What is the public input?
What is the added value of PPP;
![Page 13: Public - Private Partnerships and Solid Waste Management Infrastructure](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051513/54638621b1af9f2f538b459b/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Case Study: WMR
300,000 citizens 120,000 tons of mixed MSW Lignite mines and power plants -
Extensive lignite excavations Regional SL at old lignite mine Well established WMA
(DIADYMA S.A) First (and sole) Regional SL in Greece -20 y life expectancy
Separate Collection of Packaging Waste underway
DIADYMA S.A wishes to incorporate waste treatment – preferably a
simple and modular technology
WtE is favoured (energy easily marketable)
![Page 14: Public - Private Partnerships and Solid Waste Management Infrastructure](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051513/54638621b1af9f2f538b459b/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Project formulationDesign Built Operate Rehab.
9 Transfer stations
1 SW treatment unit
1 landfill
1 closure – rehab.
![Page 15: Public - Private Partnerships and Solid Waste Management Infrastructure](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051513/54638621b1af9f2f538b459b/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Technologies - results
3 million tons of waste 25 years Residue < 65% by weight Recycling: according EU targets MBT – RDF Anaerobic digestion
![Page 16: Public - Private Partnerships and Solid Waste Management Infrastructure](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051513/54638621b1af9f2f538b459b/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Cost barrier – landfill dependence
COUNTRY COST (€/TN)
AUSTRIA 50-150
BELGIUM 116
DENMARK 110
FINLAND 30-121
GERMANY 123
GREECE 8-35
IRELAND 120-240
ITALY 90-110
LUXEMBURG 50
NETHERLAND 58
PORTUGAL 26
SPAIN 12
SWEDEN 70-90
UK 21
COUNTRY COST (€/TN
![Page 17: Public - Private Partnerships and Solid Waste Management Infrastructure](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051513/54638621b1af9f2f538b459b/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
WMR case
LANDFILL: 13 Euros/tn
TRANSFER ST.: 15 Euros/tn
GDP / capita: 13.500 Euros/y
![Page 18: Public - Private Partnerships and Solid Waste Management Infrastructure](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051513/54638621b1af9f2f538b459b/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Total expenses: 267 m. Euros25 YEARS EXPENSES
38,000,000.00
69,632,714.15
159,286,532.17
59.68%
26.09%
14.24%
0
20,000,000
40,000,000
60,000,000
80,000,000
100,000,000
120,000,000
140,000,000
160,000,000
180,000,000
INVESTMENT LANDFILL -TREATMENT
TRANSFER STATIONOPERATION
OPERATION LANDFILL -TREATMENT
EU
RO
S
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
% E
XP
EN
SE
S
0.89%
0.65%
1.67%
1.37%
0.00%
0.20%
0.40%
0.60%
0.80%
1.00%
1.20%
1.40%
1.60%
1.80%
ACHAIA WMR
% G
DP
/ C
AP
ITA
CURRENT % GDP PROJECTED % GDP
96
180
88
185
0
50
100
150
200
EU
RO
S/T
N
ACHAIA WMR
TOTAL WM COST EUROS/TN PROJECTED WM COST
![Page 19: Public - Private Partnerships and Solid Waste Management Infrastructure](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051513/54638621b1af9f2f538b459b/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Final modeling
WESTERN MACEDONIA PPP MODEL
0.00
2,000,000.00
4,000,000.00
6,000,000.00
8,000,000.00
10,000,000.00
12,000,000.00
14,000,000.00
16,000,000.00
YEARS
EU
RO
S
WMA INCOME (euro/year) AVAILABILITY PAYMENTS (euros/year)
GATE FEES COMPOSITION
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
WMR CONTRIBUTION GOVERNMENT CONTRIBUTION
![Page 20: Public - Private Partnerships and Solid Waste Management Infrastructure](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051513/54638621b1af9f2f538b459b/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Emphasis to results
![Page 21: Public - Private Partnerships and Solid Waste Management Infrastructure](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051513/54638621b1af9f2f538b459b/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
![Page 22: Public - Private Partnerships and Solid Waste Management Infrastructure](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051513/54638621b1af9f2f538b459b/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Risk allocationRisk transfer and allocation
Risk
Public Private Shared
1.1 Cost and Timing of planning determination
1.2 Cost of compliance with planning conditions
2.1 Time and cost over-run
2.2 Remedy of defects
2.3 Site conditions
2.4 Compliance with technical specification
2.5 Variations (required by the Council after design fixed)
3.1 Obtaining the necessary licences and consents
3.2 Compliance with environmental regulations, and discharges to air, water and land
3.3 Compliance with and availability to perform service contract
3.4 Lifecycle replacement cost estimation and differential inflation
3.5 Operating cost estimation and differential inflation
4.1 Proposed facilities (or service provider revisions)
4.2 Benefits from pursuing alternative technology on agreement with the Council
![Page 23: Public - Private Partnerships and Solid Waste Management Infrastructure](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051513/54638621b1af9f2f538b459b/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
EU funds and PPP: why EU funds?
![Page 24: Public - Private Partnerships and Solid Waste Management Infrastructure](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051513/54638621b1af9f2f538b459b/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
Why PPP?
![Page 25: Public - Private Partnerships and Solid Waste Management Infrastructure](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051513/54638621b1af9f2f538b459b/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
The concept
![Page 26: Public - Private Partnerships and Solid Waste Management Infrastructure](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051513/54638621b1af9f2f538b459b/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
Key issues for success
• Build local capacity to develop technical specifications and to tender competitively.
• Create a level playing field by means of a regulatory framework.
• Specify worker safety and environmental requirements.
• Provide mechanisms to assure flow control.
• Define sanctions and enforcement mechanisms that discourage non-performance.
![Page 27: Public - Private Partnerships and Solid Waste Management Infrastructure](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051513/54638621b1af9f2f538b459b/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
• Prepare for agreements that are long enough to allow full depreciation of investment.
• Prepare agreements that are large enough in scope to allow economies of scale.
• Include price indexing to allow adequate cash flow and continuous profitability.
• Include public consensus in all key decisions.
![Page 28: Public - Private Partnerships and Solid Waste Management Infrastructure](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051513/54638621b1af9f2f538b459b/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
• Quantify outputs to enable comparative performance monitoring.
• Enlist public cooperation.
• License and control all private sector involvement.
• Monitor performance to compare service providers.