Performance of World Economies
Gavin Cameron University of Oxford
OUBEP 2006
OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME
2
introduction• “Is there some action a government
of India could take that would lead the Indian economy to grow like Indonesia’s or Egypt’s? If so, what, exactly? If not, what is it about the “nature of India” that makes it so? The consequences for human welfare involved in questions like these are simply staggering: Once one starts to think about them, it is hard to think about anything else”, Robert Lucas, 1988.
OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME
3
important elements of long-run growth
• Technical Change (q.v. Smith’s pin factory)• Over time, technology becomes more advanced, and hence output per
worker rises;• Factor Accumulation (q.v. Ramsey on saving)
• Over time, with sensible property rights, people accumulate capital assets (physical, human and environmental), even though factors are typically subject to diminishing returns;
• Factor Substitution (cf. Ricardo on land)• Over time, factors cannot earn economic rents unless their supply is
restricted, even then, other factors can be used as substitutes;• Product Substitution (q.v. Schumpeter on creative destruction)
• Over time, new varieties and qualities of products are developed, which replace previous types.
OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME
4
Kaldor’s stylised facts• Per capita output grows over
time and its growth rate does not tend to diminish; the same is true of real wages;
• Physical capital per worker grows over time;
• The rate of return to capital is nearly constant;
• The ratio of physical capital to output is nearly constant;
• The shares of labour and physical capital in national income are nearly constant;
• The growth rate of output per worker differs substantially across countries.
Source: Robert J Gordon (2005)
OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME
6
Capital per worker (K/L)
Output per worker, Y/L
diminishing returns
Output is produced using a diminishing returns production technology. As more capital is added, the additional increment to output gets smaller. The shape of the curve reflects the production technology – it gets flatter as the output elasticity of capital falls, and steeper as it rises.
Output per worker (K/L)
OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME
7
... a constant saving rate…
Capital per worker (K/L)
Saving per worker, sY/L
Some constant fraction, s, of output is saved. This saving takes the form of new capital goods.
Output per worker (K/L)
OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME
8
…and a constant depreciation rate
Capital per worker (K/L)
Required Investment per worker, (n+d)K/L
Gross investment is required each year, since the stock of capital per worker falls because of physical depreciation and because of labour force growth.
Output per worker (K/L)
OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME
9
Capital per worker (K/L)
Saving per worker, sY/L
Required Investment per worker, (n+d)K/L
Output per worker, Y/L
…the Solow model
The economy is in equilibrium when net investment is zero.
Output per worker (K/L)
K*/L
Rate of convergence is an increasing function of s, and a decreasing function of n+d and the output elasticity of capital
OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME
10
Capital per worker (K/L)
The increase in investment raises the growth rate temporarily as the economy moves to a new steady-state. But once the new higher steady-state level of income is reached, the growth rate returns to its previous level.
a rise in the saving rateOutput per worker (K/L)
s’Y/L
sY/L
Output per worker, Y/L
Required Investment per worker, (n+d)K/L
OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME
11
faster population growth
Capital per worker (K/L)
The rise in population growth means that more workers need to be equipped with capital each time period, which means that less is available for replacing depreciated equipment. This leads to a fall in the steady-state level of capital.
Output per worker (K/L)
(n+d)K/L
(n’+d)K/L
Output per worker, Y/L
Required Investment per worker
OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME
12
Capital per worker (K/L)
C/L
I/L
the golden rule
The goal of a social planner might be to maximise consumption per capita (where consumption is largest relative to investment per worker). This occurs where the slope of the output per worker curve is the same as the slope of the depreciation per worker curve. The implied saving rate is likely to be different from the market outcome.
Output per worker (K/L) Output per worker, Y/L
Required Investment per worker, (n+d)K/L
OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME
13
Capital per worker (K/L)
the poverty trap - industrialisation
low income: agricultural
high income: industrial
Required Investment per worker, (n+d)K/L
Saving per worker
Output per worker (K/L)
medium income: mixed
OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME
14
Capital per worker (K/L)
the poverty trap – endogenous fertility
low income: high fertility, high mortality
high income: low fertility, low mortality
Required Investment per worker, (n’+d)K/L
Saving per worker
Output per worker (K/L)
medium income: low fertility, high mortality
OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME
15
the AK model
Required investment per worker, (n+d)K/L
Output per worker, Y/L
Saving per worker, sY/L
If there are constant returns to broad capital, net investment might always be positive, so there is no equilibrium level of output per worker.
Capital per worker (K/L)
Output per worker (K/L)
OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME
16
Solow vs AK• The Solow model model has two
main predictions:• For countries with the same
steady-state, poor countries should grow faster than rich ones.
• An increase in investment raises the growth rate temporarily as the economy moves to a new steady-state. But once the new higher steady-state level of income is reached, the growth rate returns to its previous level – there is a levels effect but not a growth effect.
• However, the AK model yields the opposite predictions – there is no convergence, and policy changes can have permanent effects.
K/L
t
K/L
‘catch-up’
‘levels effect’
K*/L
‘growth effect’
no ‘catch-up’
t
Solow world
AK world
OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME
17
Source: O’Mahony and Van Ark (2003)
OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME
18
1960
1990
Since the 1960s, the distribution of world log income has tended to become more twin-peaked than before. Danny Quah argues that open economies tend to be in the higher peak.
twin peaks
income
number of countries
OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME
19
the sources of economic growth• Growth of output = weighted growth of inputs + growth of
total factor productivity• Growth of labour productivity = weighted growth of capital
per worker + growth of total factor productivity• Growth of inputs
• Capital and labour• Materials and energy
• Growth of total factor productivity• Higher quality products• New varieties of products• Better ways to use existing inputs
OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME
20
growth accounting
Capital per worker (K/L)
A rise in technology raises the steady-state level of output per capita. Part of this rise (AB) is the pure effect of technical change (TFP), the other part (BC) is due to ensuing capital accumulation.
A
B
C
Output per worker, Y/L
Output per worker, Y’/L
Output per worker (K/L)
OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME
21
Source: O’Mahony and Van Ark (2003), table 1.4b.
OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME
22
Source: O’Mahony and Van Ark (2003), table III.14.
OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME
23
Source: O’Mahony and Van Ark (2003), table III.5.
OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME
24
high productivity countries• Institutions that favour production over diversion: low
corruption, private property, good institutions;• Low rate of government consumption (i.e. spending
excluding investment & transfers);• Open to international trade;• Well-educated workforce;• International language;• Temperate latitude away from the equator;• Easy access to coast and ports.
OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME
25
long-run growth• Unemployment and business cycles are important in explaining
short and medium run growth, but play almost no rôle in the long-run: in the long-run, national output is determined by supply.
• In the long-run, the main source of rising living standards is rising output per worker.
• Rising output per worker is due to the steady accumulation of capital (human, physical, social, environmental) and technological progress, promoted by a supportive economic environment.
• The simple Solow model shows that there is an equilibrium level of capital per worker in the absence of technological progress. Recent ‘post-neoclassical endogenous growth models’ attempt to explain technological progress.
OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME
26
summary• “Productivity Growth isn’t
everything, but in the long-run, it is almost everything”, Paul Krugman, 1990.
OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME
27
syndicate topics• How do an increased saving rate or an increased population
growth rate affect the Solow model?• Should we expect poor or large countries to grow faster
than rich or small ones?• Assess the relative importance of investment, competition,
enterprise, innovation, and skills on productivity growth.• What factors do you think explain the above five drivers?• Why are some countries rich and others poor?• Does faster growth mean higher unemployment?
OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME
28
optional spreadsheet task• The country of Davymania starts with 100 units of capital and
30 workers. The working population grows at 2% per annum and capital depreciates at 8% per annum. Output is produced according to the production function Y=√K.√L and the saving rate is 20%.
• Use a spreadsheet to show how capital, labour, and output grow over time.
• What are the equilibrium ratios of capital per worker, and output per worker in this economy?
• Plot the response of capital per worker over time to (a) a change in the saving rate, (b) a change in the population growth rate, (c) a rise in efficiency that allows output to be 10% higher for any given level of capital and labour, (d) a production function of Y=K¼.L¾.
• [Hard] What is the half-life of the gap between any given level of capital per worker and the equilibrium? What saving rate would maximise consumption per worker in equilibrium?