Transcript
Page 1: Mammography presentation

Mammography

Past & PresentSimilar equipments were & are still being used,

these can be called as old fashioned equipments

cone

Tube

Breast Stand

Page 2: Mammography presentation

Mammography

In digital mammography screen-film system has been replaced by Detectors to give the digital images

Page 3: Mammography presentation

Mammography

Present & future

CCD camera

Work station

Equipments look like this

Page 4: Mammography presentation

Mammogram

These digital mammograms are surely better in resolution & details

Page 5: Mammography presentation

Standard views:

45* Medio lateral Oblique (MLO view)/

Lundgren’s view

Craniocaudal view (CC view)

RCC RMLOLCC LMLO

Left Craniocaudal

Right Craniocaudal

Right Mediolateral

Oblique

Left Mediolateral Oblique

Page 6: Mammography presentation

LATLeft Axillary Tail

LCV Left Cleavage

LFBLeft From Below

LLMOLeft Lateromedial

Oblique

LMLLet Mediolateral

LRLLeft Roll Lateral

LRMLeft Roll Medial

LLMLeft Lateromedial

Page 7: Mammography presentation

Extended CC view / Cleopatra’s view

Extended CC view- medial or lateral rotation

True Lateral view

Axillary view

Cleavage view

Paddle compression view

Magnification view

Eklund view (for breast implants)

Page 8: Mammography presentation
Page 9: Mammography presentation
Page 10: Mammography presentation

Extended CC view medially rotated

Extended CC view laterally rotated

Page 11: Mammography presentation
Page 12: Mammography presentation

Magnification view

Page 13: Mammography presentation
Page 14: Mammography presentation

CONVENTIONAL CC VIEW EKLUND CC VIEW

Page 15: Mammography presentation
Page 16: Mammography presentation
Page 17: Mammography presentation

cost issues

• Digital mammography is expensive!

• Using digital technology in all women would cost >$300,000 per QALY gained

• Targeted use of digital mammography on basis of age/breast density costs ~$50,000 per QALY gained

Page 18: Mammography presentation

Computer-Aided Detection

• Software program that highlights areas of concern on digital mammograms

• Uses image processing algorithms and decision threshold parameters to detect features in an image likely to be of clinical significance

• Very sensitive – detects 90% of all cancers• However, has a high rate of false positives (2-4 per study)

Page 19: Mammography presentation

http://www.imagingeconomics.com/issues/articles/2005-12_04.asp

Page 20: Mammography presentation

Courtesy: MIAS digital mammogram database

Page 21: Mammography presentation

Instant Upgrade

• Improved signal-to-noise ratio

• Ability to magnify, change contrast, or alter the brightness.

• Near instantaneous image acquisition

Page 22: Mammography presentation

Courtesy: Magee-Women’s Hospital of UPMC

Digital versus Conventional

Page 23: Mammography presentation

Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial

(DMIST)

• Retrospective study of 49,500 asymptomatic women• Assessed accuracy of digital vs film mammograms

RESULTS:• Digital mammography significantly more accurate in pre-

and perimenopausal women under 50 with dense breasts

• Nonsignificant trend toward improved accuracy with film mammograms in women over 65 with fatty breasts

Page 24: Mammography presentation

A Brief History

- 1913 Albert Salomon, German surgeon

- 1950’s - Jacob Gershon-Cohen began to advocate widespread use of X-rays for screening

- December 2005 – RSNA brings digital mammography to US

Page 25: Mammography presentation

Thank you

Talk about this session with your friends….It will add to your knowledge

[email protected]


Top Related