LAND SUITABILITY ASSESSMENTSFOR SELECTED CROPS IN PAPUA NEW GUINEA
B.B. Trangmar, D.J. Giltrap, S.J. Burgham and T.J. Savage
PNGRIS Publication No. 8
prepared byLandcare Research New Zealand Ltd on contract toCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation for Australian Agency for International Development
May 1995
Published by Australian Agency for International Development, Canberra Australia 2601
© Commonwealth of Australia 1995
This work is copyright. Apart from any fan dealing for the purposes of study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced without written permission of the Australian Agency for International Development and the Papua New Guinea Government.
Bibliographic Reference:B.B. Trangmar, D.J. Giltrap, S.J. Burgham and T.J. Savage. 1995. Land Suitability Assessments for Selected Crops in Papua New Guinea. PNGRIS Publication No. 8 (AusAID: Canberra.) 84p.
National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication data:
Land suitability assessments for selected crops in Papua New Guinea.
Bibliography.ISBN 0 642 19609 5.
1. Crops and soils - Papua New Guinea - Data processing.2. Land capability for agriculture - Papua New Guinea - Data processmg. 3. Oil palm - Soils - Papua New Guinea.4. Coffee - Soils - Papua New Guinea. I. Trangmar, B. B. (Bruce Blair), 1952- . II. Australian Agency for International Development. III. Landcare Research New Zealand. IV. CSIRO. (Senes : PNGRIS publication ; no. 8).
631.49953
Cover photograph of coastal plam south of KietaEditing, design and typesetting byPenlnfo, Mooloolah Australia 4553Pnnted by Queensland Complete Printing Services, Nambour Australia 4560
ABSTRACT
Methodology for the application of computerized land suitability assessment systems with the Papua New Guinea Resource Information System (PNGRIS) is presented. These systems comprise a land suitability model for arabica coffee production (Harding et al. 1986), tree and cash crops described in the Papua New Guinea Land Evaluation System (PNGLES) (Venema and Daink 1992). The methodology is tested for arabica coffee production and oil palm in Papua New Guinea for the major environment classes in Papua New Guinea (PNG) and for resource mapping units defined in PNGRIS. Land suitability for arabica coffee and oil palm production in PNG is mapped. The computerized land evaluation system for arabica coffee production is described. Results of the land suitability assessments for arabica coffee production based on the Harding et al. (1986) and PNGLES systems are compared. Recommendations are made for further development and validation of the land evaluation systems used. Procedures for data transfer between PNGRIS and the land evaluation systems are described.
IV
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Under an agreement between the Papua New Guinea Government and the Australian Agency for International Development (AusAID), the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) has contracted to further develop the Papua New Guinea Resource Information System (PNGRIS) and its applications. This publication is one of a series produced under that contract. The work reported here was conducted by Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd on subcontract to CSIRO
Francis Daink, Land Use Officer, Land Use Section, Department of Agriculture and Livestock, Papua New Guinea is thanked for his assistance in providing land evaluation models of the Papua New Guinea Land Evaluation System (PNGLES) for use in tins study. Dr. Clive Hackett is thanked for his advice in the application of PLANTGRO. Balthazar Wayi, Director. Research Division, Department of Agriculture and Livestock is thanked for his support and advice in developing the methods described in this report.
The assistance of Michael Siri and David Freyne in evaluating the land evaluation results are gratefully acknowledged.
ABBREVIATIONS
ALESAusAIDCSIRODALFAOLRULURLUT
PNGPNGLESPNGRISRMU
Automated Land Evaluation System Australian Agency for International DevelopmentCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (Australia) Department of Agriculture and Livestock (PNG)Food and Agriculture Organization land resource unit land use requirements land utilisation type Papua New GuineaPapua New Guinea Land Evaluation System Papua New Guinea Resource Information System resource mapping unit
V
CONTENTS
ABSTRACT iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iv
ABBREVIATIONS iv
1. INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Background and objectives 1
2. LAND EVALUATION SYSTEMS 2
2.1 Review of land evaluation in PNG 22.2 Arabica coffee land evaluation model 32.3 Papua New Guinea Land Evaluation System (PNGLES) 122.4 PLANTGRO ' 142.5 Other land evaluation systems used in PNG 16
3. METHODOLOGY 18
3.1 Classification of physical environments of PNG 183.2 Land evaluation procedures 203.3 Data transfer from PNGRIS to PLANTGRO 22
4. RESULTS 4
4.1 Physical environments of PNG 234.2 Land suitability for arabica coffee by environment subclass and RMU 264.3 Land suitability for oil palm 344.4 Land suitability for other crops 344.5 PLANTGRO ratings for Upper Ramu test area 36
5. DISCUSSION 38
5.1 Model validation requirements 385.2 Scale factors in land use suitability assessment 385.3 Adjustment of rating criteria in relation to management conditions 395.4 Application of land evaluation models 395.5 Future model development 39
6. CONCLUSIONS 40
REFERENCES 41
ANNEXES
1. Procedures for extracting soils data from PNGRIS for entry to PLANTGRO 432. Definitions of PNGRIS attributes used to define environment subclasses 473. Summary of crop suitability ratings for PNGRIS RMUs and median environment 48
subclasses according to PNGLES
VI
TABLES
1. Drainage/effective soil depth suitability classes for high input coffee production 42. Drainage/effective soil depth suitability classes for low input coffee production 43. Altitude/temperature suitability classes for coffee production 54. Mean annual rainfall suitability classes for coffee production 55. Factors and classes comprising the erosion hazard index 66. Erosion hazard index suitability classes 67. Soil fertility index factors, critical values and index points 78. Soil fertility index suitability classes 79. Suitability classes and points allocated to each diagnostic factor 810. Conversion of suitability points into a land suitability classification 811. Land characteristic classes which required translation from PNGRIS/RAMU 9
databases for use in the Harding et al. (1986) coffee model12. Erodibility classes of Soil Taxonomy great groups in PNG 1013. PNGLES land qualities and land characteristics 1314. Soil data inputs required for PLANTGRO 1515. Climatic data inputs required for PLANTGRO 1516. Environment types, subtypes and subclasses 1917. Environment types, subtypes, areas and number of RMUs 2318. Areas of suitability classes for arabica coffee production based on environment 26
subclasses19. Areas of suitability classes for low input arabica coffee production based on 28
PNGRIS RMUs20. Areas of suitability' classes for high input arabica coffee production based on 29
PNGRIS RMUs21. Comparison of suitability ratings for PNGRIS RMUs using the PNGLES 30
and Harding et al. (1986) low input arabica coffee models22. Comparison of suitability classes for high input arabica coffee production using 32
models of PNGLES and Harding et al. (1986)23. Comparison of suitability classes for low input arabica coffee production using 33
models of PNGLES and Harding et al. (1986)24. Areas of suitability classes for oil palm production based on PNGRIS RMUs 3525. PLANTGRO ratings and main limitations for selected crops and PNGRIS 36
RMUs, Upper Ramu catchment. Eastern Highlands Province
MAPS following 73
1. Major environment types, Papua New Guinea2. Suitability of environment subty pes for low input arabica coffee production (Harding
model)3. Suitability of environment subty pes for high input arabica coffee production (Harding
model)4. Suitability of PNGRIS RMUs for low input arabica coffee production (Harding model)5. Suitability of PNGRIS RMUs for high input arabica coffee production (Harding model)6. Suitability of PNGRIS RMUs for oil palm production
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background and objectives
The Papua New Guinea Resource Information System (PNGRIS) is a micro-computer-based geo- referenced database containing information on natural resources, population distribution, rural land use, small-holder economic activity and land use potential (Bellamy 1986). It is compiled at 1:500 000 scale for approximately 5000 Resource Mapping Units (RMUs) covering the entire land area of Papua New Guinea (PNG).
Two potential applications of PNGRIS are:
1) identification of areas of PNG which, given certain criteria, would be suitable for particular types of land use, and
2) determination of the most suitable type(s) of land use for specific land areas.
The land resource data in PNGRIS is appropriate for broad-scale agricultural land use suitability assessment at national and provincial level. A number of studies have conducted general (Haantjens et al. 1967, Bleeker 1975, Hackett 1988) and crop-specific (Bleeker and Freyne 1981, Vcncma and Daink 1992) agricultural land suitability assessments for PNG. Of these studies, only Venema and Daink (1992) have applied PNGRIS for such purposes. Vcncma and Daink (1992) computed suitability ratings for 22 crops for all PNGRIS RMUs but the results were stored in a database and not mapped. As a result, no spatial assessment of crop suitability was presented.
The structure of most land evaluation systems partition land on the basis of physical and climatic characteristics. A similar partitioning of PNG's physical environment was done by McAlpine (unpub.) in 1987. McAlpine identified 235 discrete environmental combinations in PNG differentiated on the basis of landform, altitude, rainfall, slope, rock type. and inundation. Ideally, physical land suitability for specific crops should be broadly similar within the same environment class when considering land use suitability for different crops on a nation-wide scale. As a result, the environment classes defined by McAlpine should be useful in partitioning the physical environment of PNG for broad-scale agricultural development planning.
The objectives of this study were to:
1) Develop procedures for application of land resource data from PNGRIS with computerized land evaluation systems to assess crop suitability for PNGRIS RMUs and the major environmental types of PNG:
2) Compute land use suitability ratings for a range of crops using coffee as a detailed test crop.3) Prepare sample maps on suitability of major environments and PNGRIS RMUs for selected
cash crops.
This report describes the:
• land evaluation systems used in the study:• procedures used in applying PNGRIS data with these systems;• development and application of a computerized land evaluation system for arabica coffee
production:• results of the crop suitability analyses.
2
2. LAND EVALUATION SYSTEMS
2.1 Review of land evaluation in PNG
Land evaluation systems have been used with land resource survey data in PNG since the 1960’s to assess land suitability for agricultural development. Haantjcns (1963, 1969) developed the ‘"Agricultural Land Classification" for arable crops, tree crops, improved pastures and paddy rice. This system was developed during the CSIRO regional land resource surveys of the 1950's and early 1960's. It is based largely on physical properties of the land. Hartley et al. (1967) defined five potential land use classes for horticulture in a survey in West New Britain. Bleeker (1975) used the main elements of Haantjcns' system to produce national 1:1 000 000 scale maps of physical land limitations (9 classes) and agricultural land use potential for the four major land use types defined by Haantjcns.
These early land evaluation systems were developed for the major groups of agricultural crops and were not crop-specific. As the amount of resource data for PNG has increased and agricultural development has proceeded, a number of crop-specific land evaluation systems were developed. These included systems for cocoa production (Bleeker and Freyne 1981, Wavi 1987), sweet potato (Radcliffe 1983), and coffee (Harding et al. 1986). A crop eco-physical land evaluation system (ECOPFTES) (Hackett 1988) was also introduced as part of PNGRIS. However, ECOPHYS has not been widely used by staff of the Department of Agriculture and Livestock (DAL) Land Use Section and has not been widely tested in PNG.
The system currently used most widely by DAL staff is the Papua New Guinea Land Evaluation System (PNGLES) developed by Venema and Daink (1992). This system is based on the FAO Framework for Land Evaluation (FAO 1976). It provides a systematic land evaluation method for the production of 18 crops at two levels of management input. Decision trees for each of the 18 crops have been developed within the computerized framework provided by the Automated Land Evaluation System (ALES) (Rossitcr and Van Wambeke 1991) Crop suitability ratings for the above crops have been computed for each province in PNG using the land resource data in PNGRIS (1:500 000 scale). PNGLES is currently being tested in soil and land resource surveys at more detailed scale by DAL Land Use Section staff. The PNGLES decision tree models for citrus, potato and pineapple were used as part of the land evaluation process in the Upper Ramu land resource survey (Trangmar et al. 1995a).
A crop physiological evaluation system (PLANTGRO) (Hackett 1991) is also currently being evaluated in PNG. PLANTGRO places more emphasis on crop physiological response to climate and soil factors. It is more appropriate for site-specific crop suitability assessments than the other systems listed above. The other systems have less rigorous climatic parameters and are easier to use with land resource survey data in which climatic variation is described in only a general way As such PLANTGRO complements the other systems for site-specific application.
In this study the arabica coffee model of Harding el al. (1986) was computerized using the ALES package and suitability ratings generated for each environment subclass and PNGRIS RMU. Ratings for all PNGLES models were computed for each environment subclass and PNGRIS RMUs. Procedures for applying PLANTGRO with PNGRIS were developed and tested in a pilot study area.
3
2.2 Arabica coffee land evaluation model
2.2.1 Introduction
Harding et al. (1986) developed a comprehensive system of land evaluation for rainfed arabica coffee production in PNG. The system is also based on the FAO (1976) framework and is a qualitative classification for two land utilization types (LUT). These are a high input system (coffee estates and managed blocks) and a low input system (small-holders).
Seven diagnostic criteria are recommended for evaluating the land suitability of individual sites, namely drainage/effective soil depth, air temperature, mean annual rainfall, erosion hazard, soil chemical fertility, site accessibility and present land use. Land resource data required to derive these criteria are:
Soil drainage class Effective rooting depthAltitude (surrogate for temperature) Mean annual rainfallErosion hazard (rainfall erosivity, soil erodibility, slope)Fertility (total N, P retention, Exch. K, Mg, CEC, pH)
The methodology enables evaluations to be made of individual (uniform) sites and also large areas of variable land, such as provinces or catchments. However, evaluations of large areas of variable land depend on the ability to map the land resource data used to derive the diagnostic criteria to run the model. The system has been validated at provincial scale using Western Highlands as a test area (Harding et al. 1987) and also applied in the Upper Ramu Catchment for land resource data collected at 1:50 000 scale (Trangmar et al. 1995a). In the latter study the classification system was computerized using the ALES framework (Rossiter and Van Wambeke 1991). The computerized version of the model has been installed on computers in DAL Land Use Section, Port Moresby.
Procedures for extracting the relevant land resource data for each resource mapping unit and transferring it into ALES to run the coffee model were similar to those used in the Upper Ramu study (Trangmar et al. 1995a). These procedures were adapted for use with PNGRIS in this study to generate coffee suitability ratings for PNGRIS RMUs and environment subclasses.
2.2.2 Diagnostic Criteria
The key land characteristics and their suitability classes required to run the Harding et al. (1986) coffee model are described briefly below.
Drainage/effective soil depth
The rating for this diagnostic criterion is detenmned from the effective soil depth, the soil depth after drainage. The depth of free-draining soil, the presence or absence of limiting layers, and the presence/absence of slowly permeable horizons are all used to determine the effective soil depth (Tables 1 and 2). These are modified versions of the respective tables in Harding et al (1986), and do not consider the possible limitation of the absence of drainage outlets, because this attribute cannot be compiled on a map unit basis.
In the evaluation for arabica coffee production, the soil is regarded as being unsuitable if the depth to which plant roots can readily penetrate is less than 50 cm (Harding et al. 1986). All soils with an impenetrable layer (e.g. rock, concretionary layer) at depths of less than 50 cm, are rated as unsuitable (R4). Soils with a depth of free-draining soil of less than 20 cm cannot be drained to attain an effective soil depth of more than 50 cm, and are also rated as unsuitable.
4
Soils without an impenetrable layer at depths of less than 50 cm, but with 20-50 cm of free-draining soil, are rated as suitable (R3), provided the soil can be drained to achieve an effective soil depth exceeding 50 cm. In most cases, this can be achieved by installing closely-spaced drams to a depth of 1 m. Drainage is possible in both low- and high-input production systems, so the soils are rated as suitable (Rating R3). However, if the soils have either low vertical- or low horizontal drainage, deep ploughing or mole draining respectively will be required. In high-input production systems, such amelioration techniques are possible. As a result, slowly permeable soils with 20-50 cm of free- draining soil are rated as suitable (R3). In low-input systems mechanized drainage techniques are too costly, and such soils are rated as unsuitable (R4).
Table 1: Drainage/effective soil depth suitability classes for high input coffee production (afterHarding et al. 1986)
Suitability rating Depth of free draining soil (cm)
R1 > 120
R2 50-120
R3 20-49
R4 <50over limiting layer
<20
Table 2: Dramage/cffcctivc soil depth suitability classes for low input coffee production(Source: Harding et al. 1986)
Suitability rating Depth of free draining soil (cm)
Presence of horizons with low vertical1 2 or horizontal“
permeability
R1 > 120 N/A
R2 50-120 N/A
R3 20-49 absent
R4 20-49 present
<50over limiting layer
N/A
<20 N/A
1 Low vertical permeability in any one horizon indicates that deep ploughing is necessary2 Low horizontal permeability indicates that mole draining will be necessary
5
Altitude
Arabica coffee production is directly related to temperature - both very low and very high temperatures can seriously affect production. In PNG a strong correlation exists between temperature and altitude. Altitude is therefore used as a diagnostic criterion (Table 3) for evaluation of suitability for coffee production (Harding et al. 1986).
Table 3: Altitude/temperature suitability classes for coffee production (after Harding et al.1986)
Suitabilityrating
Altitude range (metres a.s.l.)
Maximum annual temp, range
(°C) ^
Minimum annual temp, range
(°C) ^
High input LUT Low input LUT
Highinput
Lowinput
Highinput
Low'input
R1 1300-1699 1300-1699 26-24 26-24 15-13 15-13
R2 1100-1299 1100-1299 28-26 28-26 16-15 16-151700-1899 1700-1899 24-22 24-22 13-12 13-12
R3 1000-1099 600-1099 28-27 31-27 17-16 19-161900-2000 1900-2100 24-21 22-21 12-11 12-11
R4 <1000 <600 >28 >22 >16 >19>2000 >2100 <21 <21 <11 <11
Mean annual rainfall
Mean annual rainfall is an important climatic characteristic for arabica coffee production. Suitability ratings for rainfall classes are given in Table 4.
Table 4: Mean annual rainfall suitability classes for coffee production (Source: Harding et al.1986)
Suitability rating Mean amiual rainfall (mm)
R1 2000-2999
R3 1500-19993000-4000
R4 <1500>4000
6
Erosion hazard
In the humid tropics, rates of natural soil erosion are generally low due to the formation of a protective cover of vegetation. However if the vegetation is removed, accelerated soil erosion occurs, particularly in areas which receive high intensity rainfall (Harding et al. 1986).
In this evaluation, three factors that contribute to soil erosion by water: rainfall erosivity, soil erodibility, and slope, are all used to derive an erosion hazard index, by adding together the index points for each factor (Table 5). The suitability rating is determined from the numerical value of the erosion hazard index (Table 6). The critical values for each suitability rating are different for high-input and low-input coffee production.
Table 5: Factors and classes comprising the erosion hazard index (Source: Harding et al. 1986)
Factor and units Critical values and index points
1 2 3 4
Rainfall Erosivity (erosivity class0
Low Moderate High Very High
Soil erodibility (erodibility class2)
Very Low Low Moderate High
Slope (°) 0-8 9-16 17-32 >32
Rainfall erosivity is a function of maximum monthly precipitation and annual rainfall. Calculations of rainfall erosivity, using data from a network of existing rainfall stations across PNG have been made by Bleeker (1983). A map of rainfall erosivity classes for PNG is given in Harding et al. (1986).
Soil erodibility describes the susceptibility of the soil to erosion, and has been shown to be dependent on the texture, organic matter content, structure, and permeability of the soil. Erodibility classes for PNG soils are given in Table 12.
Table 6: Erosion hazard index suitability classes (after Harding et al. 1986)
Suitabilityrating
Erosion hazard index
High input LUT Low input LUT
R1 3-4 3-5
R2 5-7 6-8
R3 8-10 9-11
R4 11-121 12
l Or any land with slope >32°
7
Soil fertility
The inherent soil fertility is an important parameter for crop growth, particularly in low input management systems. Such systems are largely dependent on the soil for the supply of plant nutrients. In the arabica coffee model, total nitrogen, phosphate retention, exchangeable K, exchangeable Mg, cation exchange capacity, and pH are used to derive a chemical fertility index (Table 7). The importance of each of the above chemical properties to arabica coffee production, and their preferred range is given in Harding et al. (1986). The numerical value of the chemical fertility is used to determine the suitability ratings, the critical values being different for low-input and high-mput production systems (Table 8).
Table 7: Soil fertility index factors, critical values and index points (Source: Harding et al.1986)
Factor and units Critical values and index points
1 2 3 4
Total N (%) <0.10 0.10-0.19 0.20-0.50 >0.50
P retention (%) >95 85-95 60-84 >60
Exch. K (meq %) <0.10 0.10-0.19 0.20-0.60 >0.60
Exch. Mg (meq %) <0.30 0.30-0.59 0.60-1.00 >1.00
ECEC (meq %) <2 2-5 6-10 >10
or CEC (meq %) <5 5-10 11-25 >25
pH <4.5 4.5-4.9 5.0-5.4 5.5-6.5>7.5 7.1-7.5 6.6-7.0
Table 8: Soil fertility index suitability classes (Source: Harding et al. 1986)
Suitability rating Soil fertility index points
High input LUT Low input LUT
R1 >18 >20
R2 13-18 15-20
R3 8-12 10-14
R4 <8 <10
2.2.3 Land Suitability Class
For each of the diagnostic criteria described above, suitability points are assigned to each of suitability7 ratings, according to the relative importance of each (Table 9). The suitability points of a particular land unit are then added together to determine the suitability class (Table 10).
8
Table 9: Suitability classes and points allocated to each diagnostic factor (Source: Harding etal. 1986)
Diagnostic factor Suitability rating and points
R1 R2 R3 R4
Drainage/effective soil depth 12 9 6 0
Altitude 8 6 4 0
Mean annual rainfall 4 n/a 2 0
Erosion hazard 4 3 2 0
Soil fertility 4 3 2 1
Table 10: Conversion of suitability points into a land suitability classification (after Harding etal. 1986)
Suitability points Land suitability class
>27 1 (Highly Suitable)
23-27 2 (Moderately Suitable)
17-22 3 (Marginally Suitable)
<17 or any suitability rating 4 (Not Suitable)scoring zero
2.2.4 Development of the model for arabica coffee production in ALES
A computerized decision tree model of the Harding et al. (1986) arabica coffee land evaluation system was developed using the ALES framework.
The land and soil attributes required to determine the suitability ratings for the diagnostic criteria, and thus the Land Suitability Class of the Harding et al. (1986) coffee model, were set up as Land Characteristics in ALES. However, the corresponding data in the PNGRIS/Upper Ramu databases did not always have the same number of classes and/or the same critical limits as those required by the Harding et al. (1986) model. Intermediate Land Characteristics corresponding exactly to those in the PNGRIS/Upper Ramu databases were set up. Decision trees were also set up that would translate the classes of these Land Characteristics to those of the Land Characteristics required by the ALES model. This was done using “Lc -> LC’ decision trees, where decision trees are set up for the each Land Characteristic required by the Harding model that did not have matching classes in the PNGRIS/Upper Ramu databases.
9
The classes of attributes in the PNGRIS/RAMU data set that required translation are shown in Table 11 below.
Table 11: Land characteristic classes which required translation from the PNGRIS/RAMUdatabases for use in the Harding et al. (1986) coffee model
Land characteristic Land characteristic class in PNGRIS/Upper Ramu databases
Land characteristic class of Harding et al. coffee model
ECEC (meq/100g) <10 2-5
Altitude (m) 600-1200 600-999
1200-1800 1300-1699
1800-2400 2000-2099
1800-2100 1900-1999
Slope (°) 5-10 0-8
10-20 9-16
20-30 17-32
>30 >32
Total Nitrogen (%) <0.2 0.10-0.19
P Retention (%) 60-90 60-84
>90 >95
Exchangeable K (meq/100g) <0.2 0.10-0.19
pH 6-7 6.6-7.0
5-6 5.0-5.4
<5 <4.5
7-8 7.1-7.5
>8 >7.5
The Land Characteristic “depth of free draining soil'5 was derived from the data attribute “drainage class'5 in the PNGRIS/Upper Ramu database as follows:
Drainage Class (PNGRIS/Upper Ramu) Depth of free draining soil
well drained > 120cmimperfectly drained 5 0-120cmpoorly to very poorly drained 20-49cmwaterlogged (swampy) <29cm
Soil erodibility was determined from the Soil Taxonomy great group, using Table A6.1 of Harding et al. (1986). A number of additional correlations were made (Table 12) where the great groups of PNGRIS were not listed by Harding et al. (1986).
10
Table 12: Erodibility classes of Soil Taxonomy great groups in PNG (after Bleeker 1983)
Code Class Soil Taxonomy Descnptiongreat group
1 Very low Histosols Humitropepts Soils with high to very highAndisols organic matter content and
moderate to rapid permeabilities. Granular to fine crumby surface horizons.
2 Low Argiudolls Crvumbrepts Soils with moderate organicHapludolls Rhodudalfs matter content and moderateRendolls Rhodustalfs permeabilities.Argiaquolls PsammaquentsEndoaquolls TropopsammentsEpiaquolls UstipsammentsArgiustolls HaplohumultsCalciustolls PalehumultsHaplustolls Plinthohumults
3 Moderate Cryaquepts Sulfaquents Generally slowly permeableTropaquepts Tropofluvents soils with moderate organicCryochrepts Ustifluvents matter content; the alluvialDystropepts Cryorthents Entisols have low to moderateEutropepts Troporthents organic matter content, areUstropepts Ustorthents massive and may have moderateCryaquents Endoaqualfs very fine sand and silt contentEndoaquents EpiaqualfsEpiaquents HapludalfsFluvaquents HaplustalfsHydraquents Rhodudults
4 High Endoaquerts Albaquults Endoaquerts: Very slowlyHapluderts Endoaquults permeable, often subject toHaplusterts Epiaquults surface scaling and haveHalaquepts Paleaquults prismatic or coarse blockyPlinthaquepts Plinthaquults structures, but moderate organicAlbaqualfs Hapludults matter content.Natrudalfs Paleudults Hapludults and Epiaqualfs:Natrustalfs Plinthudults generally relatively low organicPlinthaqualfs Acrudox matter content and relativelyNatrustolls Hapludox high very fine sand and silt
content. Poorly structured topsoils.
1 1
2.2.5 Land use requirements
The diagnostic criteria (rainfall, altitude, erosion hazard index, chemical fertility index, and drainage/effective soil depth) were established in ALES as Land Use Requirements (LUR) for coffee. The decision trees to determine suitability ratings (severity levels in ALES) followed the tables of Harding et al. (1986) described above. The soil chemical fertility index LUR required multiple land characteristics to be set up as Lc -> Lc decision trees to avoid complex decision trees for the LURs.
In the Upper Ramu study, the severity levels for erosion hazard index of Harding et al. (1986) were adjusted so that slopes exceeding 16 degrees were unsuitable for coffee production in the low input model, and slopes greater than 8 degrees were unsuitable in the high input model (D.F. Freyne pers. comm.). In the present studv the seventy levels for erosion hazard were those described in Harding et al. (1986)
2.2.6 Physical suitability subclass
The physical suitability class (1-4) and subclass (abbreviations of the LURs/diagnostic criteria) were derived by means of a decision tree, using all the possible permutations of the five LURs/diagnostic criteria, in combination with the ‘"maximum limitation" method. The suitability classes 1-4 corresponded to the classes SI (Highly Suitable), S2 (Moderately Suitable), S3 (Marginally Suitable), and S4 (Unsuitable) respectively of Harding et al. (1986).
In the decision tree, a suitability class was allocated to each permutation of the five LURs, using the suitability points defined in Tables 9 and 10. Branching of the decision tree was stopped when any one of the diagnostic criteria was maximally limiting (i.e. had a R4 rating and zero suitability points). This was done to reduce the number of possible permutations and the size of the decision tree. When any one of the diagnostic criteria had a R4 rating, the suitability class allocated was “4”, and the subclass corresponded to the abbreviation of the maximally limiting LUR. Where more than one LUR was maximally limiting, the subclass only included the first maximally limiting LUR and would not include all the correct abbreviations. As a result, the "'decision tree'1 method was combined with the ‘"maximum limitation” method. This was done so that all the LURs which are potentially maximally limiting (i.e. drainage/effective soil depth, erosion hazard, altitude, and rainfall) were identified in the final physical suitability class allocated to each RMU.
2.2.7 Suitability ratings for compound RMUs
Many of the land units of both PNGRIS and the Upper Ramu catchment contain more than one soil great group. Each soil great group is unique, having a discrete set of attributes. This can result in different suitability ratings amongst soil great groups in the same RMU Each soil great group is estimated to occupy a certain area percentage of the RMU in which it occurs. In RMUs containing three different soil great groups it was assumed that the percentage area of the RMU occupied by each great group was 40, 30, 30, respectively. This assumption was made to simplify- the decision tree calculations in ALES. Similarly for those land units with only two soil great groups, great groups were assumed to occupy 60% and 40% of the total area respectively. In each case it was assumed that the dominant great group was listed first in the PNGRIS database.
Once the arabica coffee decision tree models were set up in ALES appropriate data for each land characteristic for each RMU was extracted from PNGRIS (Upper Ramu database in the case of the Upper Ramu study). A number of additional attributes required by the model (e.g. exchangeable Mg)
12
were added. This database was then transferred to FoxPro, whereupon ASCII files of RMU definitions and resource attributes required by the ALES system were compiled. In the ALES framework, evaluations of suitability for arabica coffee production in both low-input and high-input production systems were generated. The resultant suitability classes for each land unit were transferred to a spatial database in Maplnfo from which maps of suitability for arabica coffee production were generated.
The computerized Harding et al. (1986) arabica coffee model was originally developed for the Upper Ramu study (Trangmar et al. 1995a). It was then applied in this study to PNGR1S and used to generate the ratings shown in Maps 1 -5.
2.3 Papua New Guinea Land Evaluation System (PNGLES)
DAL Land Use Section currently uses the Papua New Guinea Land Evaluation System (PNGLES) either manually or through the Automated Land Evaluation System (ALES) package to assess land suitability for crop production. The mam concepts of PNGLES are summarized here. Full details of PNGLES are given in Venema and Daink (1992).
2.3.1 PNGLES concepts
PNGLES is based on the FAO concepts of matching land qualities with land use requirements of a specific land utilization type (LUT) (FAO 1976) to derive suitability ratings. The matching process is conducted using a decision tree framework established for each LUT within the Automated Land Evaluation System (ALES) of Rossiter and Van Wambeke (1991). Decision trees are given for smallholder production of 18 crops (cardamom, cashew, chillies, citrus, cocoa, coconut, coffee arabica and robusta, maize, mango, oil palm, pepper, pineapple, potato, pyrethrum, rubber, upland rice, and vanilla) under low input conditions and 8 crops (cocoa, coffee arabica and robusta, maize, oil palm, potato, upland rice, rubber) under medium to high input, smallholder production conditions. Suitability ratings of each land quality in relation to that required for optimum production of each crop are determined using the decision trees. The suitability rating for most limiting land quality is used to determine the overall suitability of the mapping unit for the specified land utilization type. All land utilization types, crop requirements, and decision trees are given in Venema and Daink (1992).
PNGLES was initially set up to utilize the land resources data stored in PNGRIS, but can be applied at more detailed scales (Trangmar et al. 1995a). It currently uses eight land qualities derived from 26 land characteristics (Table 13).
2.3.2 Automated Land Evaluation System (ALES)
The ALES framework provides a systematic structure and process through which to derive the land evaluation ratings for each LUT. A particular strength of ALES is that provides a user-friendly query system through which the user can ask questions about why particular ratings were derived. ALES also has the potential capability to determine gross margins for crop production if production costs, prices, and yield data are known or can be derived for each LRU. Full details of using ALES are given in the user manual (Rossiter and Van Wambeke 1991) and are not explained here. The yield and gross margins components of ALES and PNGLES have yet to be tested in PNG.
13
Table 13: PNGLES land qualities and land characteristics
Land qualities Land characteristics/attributes
Temperature Mean max. temperature Mean min. temperature
Erosion hazard SlopeSoil erodibility
Moisture conditions Mean annual rainfall Rainfall seasonality Soil texture (topsoil, subsoil) Landform
Nutrient availability pHMineral reserve Anion fixation
Potential for mechanization
Stonmess/rockinessSlopeTopsoil texture
Rooting conditions Effective soil depthSoil texture (topsoil, subsoil)Stonmess/rockiness
Nutrient availability/ retention capacity
pHCECTopsoil texture Anion fixation
Oxygen availability Soil drainage
Soil toxicities Acid sulphate Calcium carbonate
Excess of salts SalinitySodicity
In addition to the existing decision tree models for the crops developed in PNGLES by Venema and Daink (1992) ALES provides the framework to develop such models for other crops not presently included in PNGLES.
2.3.3 Data transfer between land resource databases and ALES/PNGLES Models
The relevant land characteristics for each RMU can be readily extracted from PNGRIS database and exported to ALES to conduct the crop suitability ratings using the PNGLES models. The crop suitability ratings were computed for each RMU in PNGRIS (Venema and Daink 1992). The ratings can then be reimported back to FoxPro and Maplnfo for map plotting or spatial analyses with the other land resource attributes recorded.
14
2.4 PLANTGRO
2.4.1 Concepts
PLANTGRO is crop physiology-based computerized system of assessing land suitability for crop growth (Hackett 1991). It operates by matching the environmental requirements for optimum growth of specific crops with the climatic and soil conditions of the site being evaluated. It uses empirical qualitative crop growth response curves for each climatic and soil factor and matches them with the climatic and soils conditions for the site being evaluated. Limitations of each climatic and soil parameter of the site is assessed for the crop on a 0-9 scale (0 representing optimum growth, 9 causing plant death) In assessing the overall rating for the site PLANTGRO uses the maximum limitation method in which crop growth is constrained to the level or rating imposed by the most limiting factor. The overall ratings are presented in terms of maximum limitation rating tables or graphs.
2.4.2 Crop growth response functions in PLANTGRO
PLANTGRO contains crop growth response functions for the following climate and soil/site parameters:
Climate: Soils/Site:
Daylength, solar radiation Tolerance to brief and extended cold Tolerance to heat damage Thermal units Crop development units Water availability Seasonal water logging FloodingProneness to wind damage
Aeration Base saturation Cation exchange capacity Effective rooting depth pHN, P. K Salinity SlopeSoil texture
PLANTGRO currently contains these growth functions for over 100 crops. The crop growth response files have been developed using documented information and expert consultation throughout the world Growth functions can be developed for additional crops quite easily once their response to each climate and soil factor is known. Existing functions can be easily edited to take into account cultivar or varietal differences.
2.4.3 Soil data input to PLANTGRO
Soils data can be entered directly to PLANTGRO or existing generalized soil files for particular types of soils (e.g. sandy, clay soils) can be used if the soil type at a particular site or area is not known. It is recommended that actual soil data be used wherever possible. Soil data required by PLANTGRO is given in Table 14. Soil chemical properties listed in Table 14 apply to the topsoil layer. All of the soils data can be derived from PNGRIS usmg the procedures given in Annex 1.
15
Table 14: Soil data inputs required for PLANTGRO
Soil chemical properties (Topsoil)
Soil physical/site properties
Base saturation (%) Aeration (Drainage Class)
Cation exchange capacity (meq/100g) Effective rooting depth (cm)
Nitrogen (%) Slope (degrees)
Available phosphorus (ppm) Depth (Layers A, B, C) (cm)
Exchangeable potassium (meq/100g) Texture (Layers A, B, C) (8 classes)
Salinity (dS/m) Available water holding capacity (Layers A, B) (cm/m)
Drainable water holding capacity (Layers A, B, C) (cm/m)
2.4.4 Climatic data inputs to PLANTGRO
Climatic data used in PLANTGRO (Table 15) should be derived from weather stations with more than 15 years of established record. Climatic data can be entered and crop growth analyses conducted for monthly, 10-daily, or weekly periods. Monthly data is most commonly used and is most relevant to crop suitability assessments for land resource surveys. 10-daily or weekly data may be used where particular crop physiological responses to specific weather conditions are to be assessed. Average data over the years of record or actual data for specific monthly, 10-daily or weekly periods can be entered.
Climatic data for PNG stations can be obtained from McAlpine et al. (1975) and entered to PLANTGRO. In running PLANTGRO for a particular survey area, data for the nearest or most relevant climate station is selected from the climate data menu.
Table 15: Climatic data inputs required for PLANTGRO
Data Type Data Type
Rainfall (mm)
Irrigation water applied (mm)
Daylength - average daily (hrs)
Temperature - mean daily max (°C)
Temperature - Brief cold - (e.g. mm. less 6°C)
Wind - extreme (km/hr)
Evaporation (mm)
Flooding risk value (1 or 0)
Solar radiation - average daily (Mj/m2/day)
Temperature - mean daily min. (°C)
Wind - average (km/hr)
16
2.4.5 Making crop growth predictions using PLANTGRO
Single or multiple crop suitability predictions can be computed at any one time for any combinations of crops, soils and climates. As a result, PLANTGRO is versatile in that many different crops can be compared at the same time for a particular soil and climate combination; the suitability of a particular crop can be evaluated for several different climate zones at the same time; it can also be used to assess appropriate planting times for particular crops during the year and assess crop rotation sequences for different crops under a given set of soil and climate data. PLANTGRO can also be used to assess development stages of the crop growth in response to environmental conditions. It also enables crop suitability assessments to be made for several soils and crops within a land unit.
PLANTGRO output is in the form of tables of limitation ratings for each soil and climate factor for each crop, and an overall limitation rating based on the maximum limiting rating for the individual factors. This can also be displayed graphically onscreen and results saved to a file for hard copy output. PLANTGRO also has a capability for output files to be converted to GIS format although this has not been attempted in PNG as yet.
Full details of operating PLANTGRO are given in the manual by Hackett (1991).
At the present time in PNG, PLANTGRO is best used for making crop growth predictions for particular sites or for land resource surveys with a small number of LRUs. As a result, it is quite complementary to the PNGLES suite of land evaluation models which were designed to be used with large land resource survey data sets through use of the ALES framework.
In contrast to ALES and PNGLES, PLANTGRO does not readily take management conditions into account although these can be simulated by adjusting the soil input data to match different management input levels (e.g. fertilizer, drainage, irrigation). It does not contain economic analysis modules.
PLANTGRO is not well structured to access a large land resource survey database. Its current output formats require much editing before it can be directly incorporated with a relational database for subsequent plotting with a GIS package.
2.5 Other land evaluation systems used in PNG
Land evaluation systems for a number of specific crops (including cocoa, sweet potato, coconuts) have been developed for use with land resource data in PNG. Several of these are briefly described below'. Full details of each system are given in the cited references which the reader is encouraged to consult.
2.5.1 Cocoa
Bleeker and Freyne (1981) developed a land evaluation system for cocoa based on the relative severity of nine types of physical limitations. They used this system to map areas of PNG which are suitable for cocoa production. Wayi (1987) also proposed a system of land evaluation for cocoa production at three levels of management based on the FAO (1976) framework.
17
2.5.2 Sweet Potato
Radcliffe (1983) also applied the FAO framework for land evaluation to assess contrasting land types in Southern Highlands Province for sweet potato production under the traditional Mendi cultivation system. Radcliffe’s sweet potato evaluation system could probably adapted for application in other parts of PNG.
2.5.3 Coconuts
Marques (1994) developed a land evaluation system for small-holder coconut production in PNG using the FAO framework. ALES was used as the framework within which to develop the system. The system was applied to Madang, Gulf and North Solomons Provinces as test areas using land resource data from PNGRIS. Maps of coconut suitability classes were plotted using Maplnfo and areas of different suitability classes calculated (Marques 1994). The ALES model for coconut production has been installed on computers in DAL Land Use Section in Port Moresby.
2.5.4 Other Crops
Description of environmental requirements for specific crops is beyond the scope of this handbook. A bibliography of information on 26 crops is given in Venema and Daink (1992). This and the plant growth response functions given in PLANTGRO (Hackett 1991) should be consulted if new land evaluation systems for particular crops are to be developed or existing ones improved on.
18
3. METHODOLOGY
3.1 Classification of physical environments of PNG
The RMUs of the PNGRIS database were classified into the major environment subclasses based on the criteria defined by McAlpine (unpub.).
The classification includes 14 major environment types separated initially on the basis of major landform type (Table 16). These environment types were then subdivided according to altitude and rainfall classes. These subtypes are:
Altitude class: Rainfall class:
low (0-600m)mid (600-1200m)high (1200-2400m)very high (>2400m)
dry (1000-2000mm)wet (2000-4000mm)very wet (>4000mm)
It should be noted that not all environment types contain subtypes of each altitude and/or rainfall class. For example, mangrove swamp environments only occur in the low altitude class, but occur in all three rainfall classes. As a result, there are three environment subtypes:
Mangrove Swamps:Low altitude (0-600 m), dry (1000-2000 mm)Low altitude (0-600 m), wet (2000-4000 mm)Low altitude (0-600 m), very wet (> 4000 mm).
Each environment subtype has been further subdivided into a number of environment subclasses, based either on inundation type, slope, rock type, or dominant rock type grouping (Table 16). The environment subclasses are defined according to the PNGRIS classes for each of these land resource factors (Annex 2).
19
Table 16: Environment types, subtypes and subclasses
Environment type Subtypes Subclasses Maximum number of
subclasses1 per subtype
Altitude Rainfall
Mangrove Swamps Low DryWetVery wet
- -
Estuaries and Coastal Plains
Low DryWetVery wet
Inundationtype
4
Beach Ridges and Plains
Low DryWet
- -
Raised Coral Reefs Low DryWetVery wet
Slope 3
Recent Alluvial Plains Low High Very high
Dry (L,H alt.)Wet (L,H,VH alt.) Very wet (L alt.)
Inundationtype
4
Relict Alluvial Plains Low DryWetVery wet
Inundationtype
3
Alluvial Floodplains Low DryWetVery wet
Inundationtype
3
Swamps Low Mid High Very high
Dry (L alt.)Wet (L,H,VH alt.) Very wet (L,M alt.)
Inundationtype
4
Alluvial Fans Low Mid High Very high
Dry (L,M,H alt.)Wet (L,M,H,VH alt.) Very wet (L,M,H alt.)
Rock type 3
Volcanic Plains and Fans
Low Mid High Very high
Dry (L alt.)Wet (L,M,H,VH alt.) Very wet (L,M,H alt.)
Slope 3
Volcanic Plateaux and Cones
LowMidHighVery high
Wet (L,M,H,VH alt.) Very wet (L,M,H alt.)
Slope 3
(continued)
20
Environment type
Altitude
Subtypes
Rainfall
Subclasses Maximum number of
subclasses1 per subtype
Steeplands - Karst LowMidHighVery high
Wet (L,M,H alt.) Very wet (L,M,H.VH alt.)
Slope 3
Hills LowMidHighVery high
Dry (L,M,H alt.)Wet (L,M,H,VH alt.) Very7 wet (L,M,H alt.)
Dominant rock type grouping
62
Mountains LowMidHighVery high
Dry7 (L,M,H,VH alt.) Wet (L,M,H,VH alt.) Very wet (L,M,H,VH alt.)
Dominant rock type grouping
5
Not all possible subclasses occur within each subtype.
Includes additional subclass not previously defined, for those RMUs which did not fit any of the subclass criteria
A FoxPro database file (RMUENV.DBF) containing all the RMUs from the PNGRIS database classified to environment subclass level has been installed on computers in the Land Use Section, Department of Agriculture and Livestock (DAL).
3.2 Land evaluation procedures
3.2.1 Evaluation models
Crop suitability ratings for all PNGRIS RMUs and the environment subclasses of McAlpine (unpub.) were evaluated using the PNGLES models (Venema and Daink 1992), except for arabica coffee for which the Harding et al. (1986) model was used.
The decision trees of the PNGLES models were used without modification, except for the vanilla model (low input). This model produced nil ratings for three RMUs in Central Province. The decision tree for the Tooting conditions' LUR caused the nil ratings for the particular combination of soils for these RMUs. The particular combination in question was soils with an effective soil depth of 50-100 cm, and a subsoil texture of class 6 (rock). The decision tree was altered such that this combination gave a class 2 rating for 'rooting conditions', the lowest rating elsewhere in the decision tree for all other subsoil textures and an effective soil depth of 50-100 cm.
For the Harding et al. (1986) coffee model only the decision tree for erosion hazard index (for low input production) was altered from that of the original model. In the decision tree of the original model an R4 rating is achieved only when a land unit has slopes >32 degrees, high rainfall erosivity and high
21
soil erodibility. The model was adjusted such that all units with slopes >32 degrees were given a R4 rating, including those with a higher rating for rainfall erosivity and soil erodibility.
3.2.2 Missing data from PNGRIS
Data for the rainfall erosivity (a required PNGLES land characteristic) is not part of the PNGRIS data set. Rainfall erosivity for each RMU was derived by overlaying the rainfall erosivity map given in Harding et al. (1986) onto an RMU map of each province. Maplnfo and FOXPRO were then used to compile rainfall erosivity classes for each RMU into a database which was then linked to the PNGRIS database.
3.2.3 Suitability determinations for RMUs containing more than one soil great group
For crops evaluated using the PNGLES models, suitability ratings for RMUs containing more than one soil great group were derived using the method described in Venema and Daink (1992). For the arabica coffee evaluation, the final rating of RMUs with more than one soil great group was based on the dominant soil in the RMU.
3.2.4 Calculation of median environment subclass ratings
All RMUs were classified according to the 'Natural Resource Classification from PNGRIS’ (McAlpine unpub.) down to environment subclass, altitude subclass and rainfall subclass level. The median crop suitability rating for all RMUs occurring in a particular environment subclass within a particular province was then calculated for each of a set of unique classification identifiers that occurred in each province. The median rating was then attached back to the RMUs using the unique classification identifier.
3.2.5 Data transfer and crop evaluations
The Harding et al. (1986) arabica coffee model required land unit definitions to be set up in the ALES database. These were created in FoxPro and exported to ALES using ASCII comma-delimited files. The attributes from PNGRIS required by the Harding arabica coffee model were also transferred from PNGRIS (FoxPro database files) to ALES using ASCII comma-delimited text files. The evaluations for all crops were then run and the results exported to an ASCII file, using the commands “File Evaluation Results”, ‘'Suitabilities” in the ‘'Evaluations” sub-menu (Rossiter and Van Wambeke 1991).
The PNGLES models already contained a complete attribute database for all RMUs, and so did not require attributes to be transferred from PNGRIS. The crop evaluations were run for these models, and results exported as above.
The files containing the evaluation results for the Harding arabica coffee model and the PNGLES models, were imported into FoxPro and database files created. The database files for the Harding arabica coffee model and the PNGLES models were processed differently to attach individual ratings to each of the provincial RMUs. The database files for the Harding model were filtered to remove the results for RMU constituents. The ALES evaluation results file contains an evaluation rating (integer physical suitability subclass) for each RMU that corresponds to that of the first-named soil constituent (which by PNGRIS definitions occupies 40% of each RMU). It is this rating which was then attached to each provincial RMU, in individual database files for each province/crop combination.
22
In the case of the results files from the PNGLES models the evaluation ratings for the individual soil constituents were used in combination to derive the rating for the RMU. This was done according to the method of Venema and Daink (1992). A macro was written in FoxPro to do this. The resultant whole-RMU rating was stored as a single field in individual database files for each province/crop combination.
The individual files containing evaluation ratings for each province were then combined to create a single file containing all the RMUs for each province in PNG for each crop. These files were then transferred to Maplnfo for map plotting.
3.3 Data transfer from PNGRIS to PLANTGRO
The PLANTGRO crop evaluation package (Hackett 1991) has not been evaluated for use with PNGRIS to date. The data input structures for PLANTGRO are not readily suited for application with large resource survey databases. These difficulties largely relate to extracting soils data from multifactor resource databases and adapting them to PLANTGRO's input fonnats. Procedures w7ere developed to extract soils data from PNGRIS for application with PLANTGRO. These procedures are described in full in Annex 1. The procedures were tested for 19 PNGRIS RMUs in the Upper Ramu catchment in Eastern Highlands Province. PLANTGRO analyses for these RMUs were conducted for arabica coffee, sweet orange, pineapple, Irish potato and yam. Climate data from Aiyura (McAlpine et al. 1975) was used for the climatic parameters required by PLANTGRO for the 19 test RMUs.
23
4. RESULTS
4.1 Physical environments of PNG
The distribution of the 14 major physical environment types in PNG are shown in Map 1. The enviromnent types were further subdivided into a total of 235 subclasses (McAlpine unpub.) whose distribution is too complex to be shown at the map scale (1:2 000 000) used in Map 1. A data file classifying each PNGRIS RMU into one of the 235 enviromnent subclasses has been installed on the computers in the Land Use Section, DAL.
The areas of major environment types and subtypes are summarized in Table 17. Results indicate that mountains (41%), relict alluvial plains (13%), swamps (8%) and hills (7%) are the most common environment types in PNG.
Table 17: Environment types, subtypes, areas and number of RMUs
E n v ir o n m e n t T o ta l a r e a
( k m 2)
N u m b e r o f
R M U s
M a n g r o v e s w a m p sL o w a l t i tu d e ( 0 - 6 0 0 m ) , d ry (1 0 0 0 - 2 0 0 0 m m ) 1861 35
L o w a l t i tu d e (0 - 6 0 0 m ) , w e t ( 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 m m ) 2 3 2 6 53
L o w a l t i tu d e ( 0 - 6 0 0 m ) , v e ry w e t ( > 4 0 0 0 m m ) 1511 1 0
T o ta l - M a n g ro v e s w a m p s 5 6 9 8 9 8
E s tu a r ie s a n d C o a s ta l P la in s
L o w a l t i tu d e ( 0 - 6 0 0 m ) , d ry ( 1 0 0 0 - 2 0 0 0 m m ) 1001 16
L o w a l t i tu d e (0 -6 0 0 m ) , w e t ( 2 0 0 0 - 4 0 0 0 m m ) 1059 4 2
L o w a l t i tu d e ( 0 -6 0 0 m ) , v e ry w e t ( > 4 0 0 0 m m ) 3 8 4 _9
T o ta l - E s tu a r ie s a n d c o a s ta l p la in s 2 4 4 4 6 7
B e a c h R id g e s a n d P la in sL o w a l t i tu d e (O -öO O m j, d ry ( 1 0 0 0 - 2 0 0 0 m m j 7 6 8 17
L o w a l t i tu d e (0 - 6 0 0 m ) , w e t ( 2 0 0 0 - 4 0 0 0 m m ) 1 1 2 3 52
T o ta l - B e a c h r id g e s a n d p la in s 1891 6 9
R a is e d C o ra l R e e f sL o w a l t i tu d e ( 0 - 6 0 0 m ) , d ry (1 0 0 0 - 2 0 0 0 m m ) 95 7
L o w a l t i tu d e (0 - 6 0 0 m ) , w e t ( 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 m m ) 5 3 1 2 156
L o w a l t i tu d e (0 - 6 0 0 m ) , v e ry w e t ( > 4 0 0 0 m m ) 2 1 6 3 _36
T o ta l - R a is e d c o ra l r e e f s 7 5 7 0 199
R e c e n t A l lu v ia l P la in s
L o w a l t i tu d e (0 -6 0 0 m ) , d ry (1 0 0 0 - 2 0 0 0 m m ) 3 2 1 7 4 4
L o w a l t i tu d e ( 0 -6 0 0 m ) , w e t (2 0 0 0 - 4 0 0 0 m m ) 14191 150
L o w a l t i tu d e ( 0 -6 0 0 m ) , v e ry w e t (> 4 0 0 0 m m ) 2 6 7 6 4 5
H ig h a l t i tu d e (1 2 0 0 - 2 4 0 0 m ) , d ry (1 0 0 0 - 2 0 0 0 m m ) 102 9
H ig h a l t i tu d e (1 2 0 0 - 2 4 0 0 m ) , w e t ( 2 0 0 0 - 4 0 0 0 m m ) 6 6 5 11
V e ry h ig h a l t i tu d e ( > 2 4 0 0 m ) , w e t ( 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 m m ) 131 _ 9
T o ta l - R e c e n t a l lu v ia l p la in s 2 0 9 2 8 2 6 8
R e l ic t A l lu v ia l P la in s
L o w a l t i tu d e ( 0 -6 0 0 m ) , d ry (1 0 0 0 - 2 0 0 0 m m ) 2 2 9 6 0 2 8
L o w a l t i tu d e (0 -6 0 0 m ) , w e t ( 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 m m ) 2 1 4 9 1 2 0
L o w a l t i tu d e ( 0 -6 0 0 m ) , v e ry w e t ( > 4 0 0 0 m m ) 1 5 3 6 3 U
T o ta l - R e l ic t a l lu v ia l p la in s 5 9 8 1 4 59
( c o n t in u e d )
24
E n v iro n m e n t T o ta l a rea (k m 2)
N u m b e r o f R M U s
A llu v ia l F lo o d p la in sL o w a ltitu d e (0 -6 0 0 m ), d ry (1 0 0 0 -2 0 0 0 n u n ) 3364 27L o w a ltitu d e (0 -6 0 0 m ), w e t (2 0 0 0 -4 0 0 0 n u n ) 19582 89L o w a ltitu d e (0 -6 0 0 in ), very w e t (> 4 0 0 0 m m ) 4 4 9 9 _24T o ta l - A llu v ia l flo o d p la in s 27445 140
S w am p sL o w a ltitu d e (0 -6 0 0 m ), d ry (1 0 0 0 -2 0 0 0 m m ) 4 5 6 9 33L o w a ltitu d e (0 -6 0 0 m ), w e t (2 0 0 0 -4 0 0 0 n u n ) 2 5995 168L o w a ltitu d e (0 -6 0 0 m ), very w e t (> 4 0 0 0 m m ) 4 5 2 9 21M id a lti tu d e (6 0 0 -1 2 0 0 m ), very w e t (> 4 0 0 0 m m ) 128 5H ig h a lti tu d e (1 2 0 0 -2 4 0 0 m ), w e t (2 0 0 0 -4 0 0 0 m m ) 13 1V ery h ig h a lti tu d e (> 2 4 0 0 m ), w e t (2 0 0 0 -4 0 0 0 m m ) 14 J _T o ta l - S w am p s 35248 229
A llu v ia l F an sL ow a ltitu d e (0 -6 0 0 m ), d ry (1 0 0 0 -2 0 0 0 m m ) 4 4 5 8 41L o w a ltitu d e (0 -6 0 0 m ), w e t (2 0 0 0 -4 0 0 0 n u n ) 7964 111L o w a ltitu d e (0 -6 0 0 m ), very w e t (> 4 0 0 0 m m ) 907 11M id a lti tu d e (6 0 0 -1 2 0 0 m ), d ry (1 0 0 0 -2 0 0 0 m m ) 89 3M id a lti tu d e (6 0 0 -1 2 0 0 m ), w e t (2 0 0 0 -4 0 0 0 m m ) 539 14M id a lti tu d e (6 0 0 -1 2 0 0 m ), very w e t (> 4 0 0 0 m m ) 86 3H ig h a lti tu d e (1 2 0 0 -2 4 0 0 m ), d ry (1 0 0 0 -2 0 0 0 m m ) 181 6H ig h a lti tu d e (1 2 0 0 -2 4 0 0 m ), w e t ( 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 m m ) 1542 39H ig h a lti tu d e (1 2 0 0 -2 4 0 0 m ), very w e t (> 4 0 0 0 m m ) 114 3Very' h ig h a lti tu d e (> 2 4 0 0 m ), w e t (2 0 0 0 -4 0 0 0 m m ) 76 _ 3T o ta l - A llu v ia l fans 15956 234
V olcan ic P la in s a n d F an sL ow a ltitu d e (0 -6 0 0 m ), d ry (1 0 0 0 -2 0 0 0 n u n ) 47 1L ow a ltitu d e (0 -6 0 0 m ), w e t (2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 m m ) 10197 88L ow a ltitu d e (0 -6 0 0 m ), very' w e t (> 4 0 0 0 m m ) 7761 29M id a lti tu d e (6 0 0 -1 2 0 0 m ), w e t ( 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 m m ) 1167 19M id a lti tu d e (6 0 0 -1 2 0 0 m ), very w e t (> 4 0 0 0 n u n ) 1710 18H ig h a lti tu d e (1 2 0 0 -2 4 0 0 m ), w e t ( 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 m m ) 3286 38H igh a lti tu d e (1 2 0 0 -2 4 0 0 m ), very w e t (> 4 0 0 0 m m ) 452 8V ery h ig h a lti tu d e (> 2 4 0 0 m ), w e t ( 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 n m i) 711 _ 9T o ta l - V o lcan ic p la in s an d fans 25331 212
V olcan ic P la te a u x an d C o n esL o w a ltitu d e (0 -6 0 0 m ), w e t ( 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 m m ) 3618 77L o w a ltitu d e (0 -6 0 0 m ), very w e t (> 4 0 0 0 n u n ) 40 4 18M id a lti tu d e (6 0 0 -1 2 0 0 m ), w e t ( 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 m m ) 2665 36M id a lti tu d e (6 0 0 -1 2 0 0 m ), very w e t (> 4 0 0 0 m m ) 802 11H ig h a lti tu d e (1 2 0 0 -2 4 0 0 m ), w e t ( 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 m m ) 2 084 36H ig h a lti tu d e (1 2 0 0 -2 4 0 0 m ), very w e t (> 4 0 0 0 m m ) 836 16V ery h ig h a lti tu d e (> 2 4 0 0 m ), w e t ( 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 m m ) 994 _ L ZT o ta l - V o lcan ic p la te a u x a n d cones 11403 211
(c o n tin u ed )
25
E n v iro n m e n t T o ta l a rea N u m b e r o f(k m 2) R M U s
S te e p la n d s , K a rs tL ow a ltitu d e (0 -6 0 0 m ), w e t ( 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 m m ) 169 28L o w a ltitu d e (0 -6 0 0 m ), very w e t (> 4 0 0 0 m m ) 7 518 25M id a lti tu d e (6 0 0 -1 2 0 0 m ), w e t (2 0 0 0 -4 0 0 0 m m ) 4 0 7 6 21M id a lti tu d e (6 0 0 -1 2 0 0 m ), very w e t (> 4 0 0 0 m m ) 3 897 21H ig h a lti tu d e (1 2 0 0 -2 4 0 0 m ), w e t (2 0 0 0 -4 0 0 0 m m ) 3697 26H ig h a lti tu d e (1 2 0 0 -2 4 0 0 m ), very w e t (> 4 0 0 0 m m ) 1524 21V ery h ig h a lti tu d e (> 2 4 0 0 m ), w e t (2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 m m ) 1447 14V ery h ig h a lti tu d e (> 2 4 0 0 m ), w e t (2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 m m ) 573 J JT o ta l - S te ep la n d s , k a rs t 2731 25463 169
H illsL o w a ltitu d e (0 -6 0 0 m ), d ry (1 0 0 0 -2 0 0 0 m m ) 5796 58L o w a ltitu d e (0 -6 0 0 m ), w e t (2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 m m ) 17929 192L ow a ltitu d e (0 -6 0 0 m ), very w e t (> 4 0 0 0 m m ) 4 3 0 8 30M id a lti tu d e (6 0 0 -1 2 0 0 m ), dry (1 0 0 0 -2 0 0 0 m m ) 323 3M id a lti tu d e (6 0 0 -1 2 0 0 m ), w e t ( 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 m m ) 49 9 16M id a lti tu d e (6 0 0 -1 2 0 0 m ), very w e t (> 4 0 0 0 m m ) 4 70 10H ig h a lti tu d e (1 2 0 0 -2 4 0 0 m ), d ry (1 0 0 0 -2 0 0 0 m m ) 264 5H ig h a lti tu d e (1 2 0 0 -2 4 0 0 m ), w e t ( 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 m m ) 2 334 44H ig h a lti tu d e (1 2 0 0 -2 4 0 0 m ), very w e t (> 4 0 0 0 m m ) 2 633 1V ery h ig h a lti tu d e (> 2 4 0 0 m ), w e t ( 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 m m ) 425 _ioT o ta l - H ills 32383 269
M o u n ta in sL o w a ltitu d e (0 -6 0 0 m ), d ry (1 0 0 0 -2 0 0 0 m m ) 4 7 8 7 36L o w a ltitu d e (0 -6 0 0 in ), w e t ( 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 m m ) 43911 365L o w a ltitu d e (0 -6 0 0 m ), very w e t (> 4 0 0 0 m m ) 19886 157M id a lti tu d e (6 0 0 -1 2 0 0 m ), dry (1 0 0 0 -2 0 0 0 m m ) 567 11M id a lti tu d e (6 0 0 -1 2 0 0 m ), w e t ( 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 m m ) 36433 302M id a lti tu d e (6 0 0 -1 2 0 0 m ), very w e t (> 4 0 0 0 m m ) 11657 123H ig h a lti tu d e (1 2 0 0 -2 4 0 0 m ), d ry (1 0 0 0 -2 0 0 0 m m ) 2 180 24H ig h a lti tu d e (1 2 0 0 -2 4 0 0 m ), w e t ( 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 m m ) 4 7 9 7 2 482H ig h a lti tu d e (1 2 0 0 -2 4 0 0 m ), very w e t (> 4 0 0 0 m m ) 6725 121V ery h ig h a lti tu d e (> 2 4 0 0 m ), dry (1 0 0 0 -2 0 0 0 m m ) 99 2V ery h ig h a lti tu d e (> 2 4 0 0 m ), w e t (2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 m m ) 12311 187V ery h ig h a lti tu d e (> 2 4 0 0 m ), very w e t (> 4 0 0 0 m m ) 47 9 17T o ta l - M o u n ta in s 187007 1828
26
4.2 Land suitability for arabica coffee by environment subclass and RMU
4.2.1 Suitability for arabica coffee based on environment subclass
The suitability of arabica coffee production (Harding et al. 1986) based on analysis of median ratings for each environment subclass are shown in Maps 2 (low input) and 3 (high input). Map 2 indicates that small areas of highly suitable land occur near Goroka in Eastern Highlands Province, Mt Hagen in Western Highlands Province and in Southern Highlands Province. Large areas with moderate suitability occur along the main axial ranges of the PNG mainland with small areas at higher elevations in East New Britain, New Ireland and the islands in Milne Bay Province.
Map 3 also indicates that the same areas which are highly suited for low input coffee production are also well suited for high input production. However, a much smaller area is moderately suited and is restricted to parts of the Southern Highlands, Enga, Western Highlands, Eastern Highlands and Morobe Provinces with small areas in Central and Northern Provinces. The total areas of suitability class based on analysis of environment subclasses are given in Table 18.
Table 18: Areas of suitability classes for arabica coffee production based on environmentsubclasses
Input level Suitability class Total
High Moderate Marginal Not suitable
Low (km2) 2909 61370 22068 372288 458635
Low (%) 0.6 13.4 4.8 81.2 100
High (km2) 3131 10316 732 444456 458635
High (%) 0.7 2.2 0.2 96.9 100
4.2.2 Suitability for arabica coffee based on RMUs
The suitability of arabica coffee production based on application of the Harding et al. (1986) model for each of the PNGRJS RMUs is shown in Maps 4 (low input) and 5 (high input). The suitability ratings determined on analysis of each RMU are summarized in Tables 19 (low input) and 20 (high input) for each province. About 4% of PNG has high physical suitability under either low or high input management (Tables 19, 20). These areas occur mainly in the 1300-1700 altitude range in rolling terrain in West Sepik, Southern Highlands, Enga, Western Highlands, parts of Chimbu, Eastern Highlands, Morobe, Central and Milne Bay Provinces with small areas in Madang and Northern Provinces (Maps 4 and 5).
About 8% of PNG is moderately suited for low input arabica coffee production compared to about 1% under high input levels. Areas of moderate suitability for low input production are generally adjacent to the highly suitable areas listed above (Map 4). These are generally areas which are less suitable because of soil constraints (effective rooting depth, soil fertility), steeper slopes, suboptimal altitude/temperature range, or soil erodibility. Areas which are marginal for low input production occur on higher parts of New Britain, New Ireland and Bougainville with constraints largely caused by warmer temperatures and moist climate.
27
Results indicate a wider distribution of areas of high suitability based on RMU analysis compared to the values determined using the median rating for each environment subclass (Maps 2 and 3). In the environment subclass approach, values of land attributes are averaged across RMUs within each contiguous environment subclass. This may result in the relatively lower suitability ratings of many areas using the environment subclass median values compared to analysis based on each RMU.
Soil factors were not used as criteria for separating environment subclasses. They were not used because of the complexity of the soil pattern and difficulties of delineating homogeneous units at 1:500 000 scale in PNGRIS.
28
Table 19: Areas of suitability classes for low input arabica coffee production based on PNGRISRMUs
P rov ince S u itab ility c lass and areaT otalarea
H igh M oderate M arg ina l U nsu itab le
(k m 2) (%) (k m 2) (% ) (k n r ) (% ) (k m 2) (% ) (k n r )
W este rn 16 <0.1 10 <0.1 0 0 96260 99.9 96286
G u lf 0 0 60 0.2 0 0 33787 99.8 33847
C en tra l 2233 7.5 4899 16.4 39 0.1 22747 76.0 29918
M iln e Bay 587 4.2 1513 10.7 4 <0.1 12021 85.1 14125
N o rth e rn 694 3.1 3071 13.6 0 0 18745 83.3 22510
S ou th ernH ig h lan d s 2444 9.5 3796 14.8 0 0 19400 75.7 25640
E n g a 1392 11.8 2119 17.9 81 0.7 82470 69.6 11839
W este rnH ig h lan d s 2080 23.4 3183 35.7 0 0 3634 40.9 8897
C h im bu 373 6.2 996 16.5 0 0 4653 77.3 6022
E as te rnH ig h lan d s 3607 32.8 3340 30.4 292 2.6 3767 34.2 11006
M orobe 3693 11.0 6413 19.1 331 1.0 23074 68.9 33511
M ad an g 371 1.3 851 3.0 84 0.3 27355 95.4 28661
E as t Sepik 19 <0.1 378 0.9 99 0.2 43020 98.9 43516
W est Sepik 1527 4.2 3419 9.5 11 <0.1 31053 86.2 36010
M an u s 0 0 0 0 0 0 2098 100 2098
N ew Ire lan d 0 0 458 4.8 1922 20.0 7235 75.2 9615
E as t N ew B rita in 0 0 427 2.8 2357 15.6 12325 81.6 15109
W est N ew B rita in 0 0 29 0.1 1800 8.7 18867 91.2 20696
N o rthS o lom ons 0 0 100 1.1 1045 11.2 8184 87.7 9329
T O T A L 19036 4.2 35062 7.6 8065 1.8 396472 86.4 458635
29
Table 20: Areas of suitability classes for high input arabica coffee production based on PNGRISRMUs
Province Suitability class and areaTotalarea
High Moderate Marginal Unsuitable
(km2) (%) (km:) (%) (km2) (%) (km2) (%) (km2)
Western 16 <0.1 10 <0.1 0 0 96260 99.9 96286
Gulf 0 0 0 0 0 0 33847 100 33847
Central 2179 7.3 162 0.5 39 0.1 27538 92.1 29918
Milne Bay 587 4.2 25 0.2 4 <0.1 13509 96.8 14125
Northern 694 3.1 14 0.1 0 0 21802 96.8 22510
SouthernHighlands 2549 9.9 867 3.4 0 0 22224 86.7 25640
Enga 1392 11.8 337 2.8 0 0 10110 85.4 11839
WesternHighlands 2226 25.0 777 8.7 0 0 5894 66.3 8897
Chimbu 491 8.2 113 1.9 0 0 5418 89.9 6022
EasternHighlands 3607 32.8 650 5.9 93 0.8 6656 60.5 11006
Morobe 3719 11.1 135 0.4 0 0 29657 88.5 33511
Madang 251 0.9 203 0.7 0 0 28207 98.4 28661
East Sepik 19 <0.1 0 0 0 0 43497 99.9 43516
West Sepik 1544 4.3 220 0.6 11 <0.1 34235 95.1 36010
Manus 0 0 0 0 0 0 2098 100 2098
New Ireland 0 0 0 0 483 5.0 9132 95.0 9615
East New' Britain 0 0 433 2.9 42 0.3 14634 96.8 15109
West New7 Britain 0 0 39 0.2 0 0 20657 99 8 20696
NorthSolomons 0 0 100 1.1 0 0 9229 98.9 9329
TOTAL 19274 4.2 4085 0.9 672 0.2 434604 94.7 458635
30
4.2.3 Comparison of PNGLES and Harding et al. (1986) arabica coffee models
Suitability ratings determined by the PNGLES (Venema and Daink 1992) and Harding et al. (1986) low input arabica coffee land evaluation models were compared at two different spatial scales:
• 1: 500 000 scale based on the PNGRIS RMUs, and• 1: 50 000 scale for 598 Land Resource Units (LRUs) mapped in the Upper Ramu catchment
(Trangmar et al. 1995a) in Eastern Highlands Province.
Results for the comparison between models (Table 21) show that the Harding et al. (1986) model rates about 11% of PNG as being of high or moderate suitability for low input arabica coffee production. In contrast, the PNGLES model rates only about 4% as being moderately suitable, with none being highly suited.
Table 21: Comparison of suitability ratings for PNGRIS RMUs using the PNGLES and Hardinget al. (1986) low input arabica coffee models
Rating class PNGLES Harding et al. (1986)
Area (km2) % Area (km2) %
1 0 0 19036 4.2
2 17325 3.8 35062 7.6
3 281339 61.3 8065 1.8
4 150642 32.8 396472 86.4
458635 100 458635 100
In the comparison made at 1:50 000 scale, the Harding et al. (1986) model for high input arabica coffee production produced a more severe rating than the PNGLES model for 31% of LRUs (Table 22). In 18% of LRUs the Harding et al. (1986) model produced a less severe rating than the PNGLES model. The remaining 50% of LRUs had the same rating in each system. For low input production, the Harding et al. (1986) model produced a more severe rating than the PNGLES model (Table 23) for 48% of the LRUs. In 21% of LRUs the Harding et al. (1986) model produced a more severe rating the PNGLES. The remaining 31% of LRUs had the same rating in each system.
Many of the discrepancies between the two systems are caused by differences in the decision trees and class boundaries for altitude (temperature) and rainfall land use requirements. The Harding et al. (1986) model treats vanation in altitude outside the optimal range of 1300-1699 m more severely than the PNGLES model. Similarly, the Harding et al. (1986) model downgrades variation in rainfall outside the 2000-2999 mm optimal range more severely than the PNGLES models.
For example, in the Harding et al. (1986) model, a rainfall of less than 1500 mm yields a severity level for the rainfall land use requirement of “4”. The suitability class is therefore Class 4, indicating that this LRU is unsuitable for both high and low input arabica coffee production. However h the PNGLES model, the land use requirement decision tree yields a severity level of “2”, because i: also considers the texture of the subsoil in this decision tree.
31
Therefore rainfall is rated more severely in the Harding model. In the case of the Upper Ramu, this has a significant effect on the ratings produced with 276 LRUs in the low input model, and 186 LRUs in the high input model being affected by the more severe rainfall rating.
In cases where the PNGLES models produced more severe ratings, this was largely due to differences in assessment of soil aeration or wetness. In PNGLES aeration status is solely derived from soil drainage class. For poorly or very poorly drained soils, the land use requirement rating is c4’ (i.e. unsuitable for coffee production). However, for the corresponding land use requirement (drainage/effective soil depth) in Harding et al. (1986) such soils are rated as 3. Where drainage is mitigated by other land use requirements the final rating for such soils in Harding et al. (1986) may be 2 .
4.2.4 Interpretation of land evaluation results
The differences in evaluation results of the two models for both the PNGR1S RMUs and the Upper Ramu study indicate the need for users of the land evaluation systems to be fully aware of which models and criteria were used. They should also be aware of the limitations of the models used.
The results also indicate that the PNGLES and Harding et al. (1986) models require further validation before they are widely applied in PNG.
32
Table 22: Comparison of suitability classes for high input arabica coffee production usingmodels of PNGLES and Harding et al. (1986)
Rating class, Harding model
Rating class, PNGLES model
No. of LRUs
Example Harding model subclass1
Example PNGLES model subclass2
Harding model more severe:
4 3 46 4r/e 3e
4 2 137 4r 2m/t
3 2 3 3a/r 2c/m/w
3 1 - - -
2 1 - - -
Total LRUs 186(31.1%)
Venema model more severe:
3 4 7 3d/a/r 4w
2 4 42 2d/r 4w
2 3 - - -
1 3 - - -
1 2 63 1 2m/t
Total LRUs 112(18 7%)
No difference:
4 4 260 4r/e 4e
3 3 - - -
2 2 40 2r 2mAv
1 1 - - -
Total LRUs 300(50.2%)
1 Subclass abbreviations for the Harding models as follows:a altitude d drainage/effective soil depthe erosion hazard r rainfall
Subclass abbreviations for the Venema models as follows: c temperature m moisture conditionst nutrient availability/retention capacity w oxygen availability (wetness)
33
Table 23: Comparison of suitability classes for low input arabica coffee production using modelsof PNGLES and Harding et al. (1986)
Rating class, Harding model
Rating class, PNGLES model
No. of LRUs
Example Harding model subclass1
Example PNGLES model subclass2
Harding model more severe:
4 3 226 4r/e 3e
4 2 50 4r 2m/n
3 2 8 3a/r 2c/e/m/w
3 1 - - -
2 1 - - -
Total LRUs 284(47.5%)
Venema model more severe:
3 4 28 3d/r 4w
2 4 - - -
2 3 - - -
1 3 - - -
1 2 99 1 2e/m
Total LRUs 127(21.2%)
No difference:
4 4 101 4r/e 4e
3 3 - - -
2 2 86 2r 2e/m/r/w
1 1 - - -
Total LRUs 187(31.3%)
1 Subclass abbreviations for the Harding models as follows:a altitude d drainage/effective soil depthe erosion hazard r rainfall
2 Subclass abbreviations for the Venema models as follows:c temperature m moisture conditionst nutrient availability/retention capacity w oxygen availability (wetness)
34
4.3 Land suitability for oil palm
The suitability of land for high input oil palm production based on application of the PNGLES model (Venema and Daink 1992) for each of the PNGRIS RMUs is shown in Map 6. The suitability ratings determined on analysis of each RMU are summarized in Table 27 for each province. Results indicate that about 4% of PNG has high physical suitability for oil palm. These areas occur mainly in Madang, Morobe, Northern, Central, Milne Bay, West New Britain, New Ireland and North Solomons Provinces. About 6% of PNG is moderately suited, 24% is marginal and 66% is unsuitable (Table 24, Map 6).
Areas of moderate suitability occur in East and West Sepik, the Gogol Valley in Madang, parts of Western Province, Gulf, Central, Northern, New Britain, and small areas in Morobe, Milne Bay, North Solomons, and New Ireland.
4.4 Land suitability for other crops
Land suitability assessments were conducted using the PNGLES models for low input, small-holder production of 14 other crops (cardamom, cashew, chillies, citrus, cocoa, coconut, coffee robusta, maize, mango, oil palm, pepper, pineapple, potato, pyrethrum, rubber, upland rice, and vanilla) under low input conditions and 6 other crops (cocoa, coffee robusta, maize, potato, upland rice, rubber) under medium to high input, smallholder production conditions.
For each of the above crops, land suitability ratings for each PNGRIS RMU were transferred from ALES and linked to the PNGRIS database for mapping using Maplnfo. These crop suitability map files have been installed on the computers in the DAL Land Use Section, Port Moresby from which hard copy maps can be readily produced. The maps are too numerous to be presented in this report. The example of oil palm is given m Map 6.
In addition, suitability ratings were computed for each median environment subclass for all 18 of the PNGLES crops (Venema and Daink 1992). Results for each province have been installed on the DAL Land Use Section computers. Area summaries (km“ and per cent of total province area) of suitability ratings by crop and province are given in Annex 3 for the PNGLES models calculated on an RMU basis and by median environment subclass.
35
Table 24: Areas of suitability classes for oil palm production based on PNGRIS RMUs
P rov ince S uitab ility class an d areaT ota larea
H igh M oderate M arg in a l U nsuitab le
(k m 2) (% ) (k m 2) (% ) (k m 2) (% ) (k m 2) (% ) (km 2)
W este rn 0 0 5384 5.6 51457 53.4 39445 41.0 96286
G u lf 698 2.1 3333 9.9 1115 3.3 28701 84.7 33847
C en tra l 1127 3.8 1816 6.1 5297 17.7 21678 72.4 29918
M iln e Bay 1975 14.0 1207 8.6 1727 12.2 9216 65.2 14125
N o rth e rn 2925 13.0 1927 8.6 3827 17.0 13831 61.4 22510
S ou thernH ig h lan d s 0 0 529 2.1 145 0.6 24966 97.3 25640
E n g a 68 0.6 54 0.5 0 0 11717 98.9 11839
W este rnH ig h lan d s 257 2.9 172 1.9 726 8.2 7742 87.0 8897
C h im bu 0 0 40 0.7 1081 18.0 4901 81.3 6022
E aste rnH ig h lan d s 0 0 116 1.0 98 0.9 10792 98.1 11006
M orobe 1107 3.3 1021 3.1 4541 13.6 26842 80.0 33511
M ad an g 4069 14.2 2132 7.4 3607 12.6 18853 65.8 28661
E a s t Sepik 0 0 981 2.2 10524 24.2 32011 73.6 43516
W est Sepik 0 0 2676 7.4 13254 36.8 20080 55.8 36010
M anus 193 9.2 662 31.6 260 12.4 983 46.8 2098
N ew Ire lan d 1448 15.1 1319 13.7 2384 24.8 4464 46.4 9615
E ast N ew B rita in 816 5.4 1737 11.5 0 0 12556 83.1 15109
W est N ew B rita in 2551 12.3 3782 18.3 3871 18.7 10492 50.7 20696
N o rthSolom ons 2185 23.4 685 7.3 4305 46.2 2154 23.1 9329
T O T A L 19419 4.2 29573 6.5 108219 23.6 301424 65.7 458635
36
4.5 PLANTGRO ratings for Upper Ramu test area
Crop suitability ratings and dominant constraints for selected PNGR1S RMUs from the Upper Ramu test application of PLANTGRO are summarized in Table 25. PLANTGRO uses growth limitation ratings (GLRs) imposed by soil or climatic constraints to assess potential crop performance. GLRs are rated (Hackett 1991) as:
0-2 High potential crop performance (Minimal physical limitations to crop growth)3-4 Moderate potential crop performance (Moderate limitations to crop growth)5-6 Low potential crop performance (Significant limitations to crop growth)7-8 Nil potential (Severe limitations to crop growth)9 Rapid death (Very severe limitations to crop growth).
The PLANTGRO ratings correspond to the high, moderate, marginal and unsuitable classes used in this report for ratings derived from PNGLES and Harding et al. (1986)
Table 25: PLANTGRO ratings and mam limitations for selected crops and PNGRIS RMUs,Upper Ramu catchment, Eastern Highlands Province. Comparative ratings for Harding et al. (1986) for arabica coffee and PNGLES for other crops (except yam) in parentheses.
RMU No. PLANTGRO crop performance ratings and main limitations
Arabica coffee Sweet orange Pineapple Irish potato Yam
171 9(4) 6(3) 5(3) 5(3) 6Slope Soil texture Fertility Slope Temp.
441 3(2) 3(2) 4 (2) Solar 3(2) 6Fertility Temperature radiation Fertility Temp.
442 4(2) 6(3) 5(3) 5(3) 6(3)Aeration Aeration,
textureFertility Fertility Temp.
452 6(3) 7(4) 7(4) 7(4) 6(3)Aeration Aeration Aeration Aeration Temp.
60 4(2) 4(2) 5(3) 5(3) 6(3)Slope Temperature Fertility Fertility Temp.
64 2(1) 4(2) 4(2) 2(1) 6(3)Nil Temperature Solar
radiationNil Temp.
For the RMUs listed in Table 25 ratings based on PLANTGRO correlated closely with those for the other evaluation systems used. As with the ALES-based systems (PNGLES and Harding et al. (1986), the limitation ratmgs of each land characteristic are given in the PLANTGRO output. An additional advantage of the PLANTGRO output is that climatic limitations at various parts of the grow ing season
37
can be identified for each crop. This capability is not present in PNGLES or the Harding et al. (1986) coffee models.
The land use requirements in PLANTGRO are more physiologically-based than PNGLES or the Harding et al. (1986) coffee model. As a result, PLANTGRO is more sensitive to climatic parameters than the other two models. For example, Table 25 indicates that while there are basically no soil constraints to growth of pineapple in RMUs 441 and 64, solar radiation is the major limiting factor to achieving optimum growth. Factors such as solar radiation are not included in the other models.
The structure of PLANTGRO enables rapid comparison of site suitability for a range of crops, comparison of sites (different soils, and/or climates) for a specific crop(s), crop rotations, and assessment of the phasic development of some crops. It is also flexible in climate data entry which can include weekly or mean monthly records, or actual monthly records for a specific year. As a result, it complements the relatively inflexible decision tree structure of the ALES-based models. However, PLANTGROs current input/output formats are not easily linked with relational databases or computer mapping packages. This constraint limits its widespread application with large resource databases.
38
5. DISCUSSION
5.1 Model validation requirements
The analysis has indicated a need for wider validation of the PNGLES models (Venema and Daink 1992) and the Harding et al. (1986) arabica coffee models. The PNGLES models have been applied for several small areas by DAL Land Use Section staff (L. Dainkpers comm.). They were also used to assess land suitability for citrus and Irish potato at 1:50 000 scale in the Upper Ramu catchment (Trangmar et al. 1995a). In the latter study, the suitability ratings produced by the models for specific areas were compared with local experience of crop production as a reliability check. However, no systematic quantitative testing of models in relation to yield and specific management inputs in different locations has been conducted to date.
The arabica coffee models of Harding et al. (1986) have been applied and tested in the Western Highlands (Harding et al. 1987). They were also applied at 1:50 000 scale in the Upper Ramu catchment (Trangmar et al. 1995a). Results were generally consistent with local experience.
Both the PNGLES and Harding et al. (1986) arabica coffee models require further field testing in areas with different land characteristics and management regimes. Validation should include comparison of model ratings with crop yield results under known management inputs. This should be done in a range of environments that cover a range of rating classes so that the boundaries between rating classes can be more reliably defined.
As the systems become used and tested in different areas, they should be refined and updated by DAL Land Use Section staff. This should be an ongoing activity as DAL experience in application of the various systems increases.
In addition, comparisons of different land evaluation systems which exist in PNG for some crops (e g. cocoa) should be systematically compared so DAL staff can select the most appropriate model for each crop. For example, the results produced by the cocoa model of Bleeker and Freyne (1981) should be compared with those of PNGLES (Venema and Daink 1992) and PLANTGRO (Hackett 1991) to assess which best match local experience.
5.2 Scale factors in land use suitability assessment
The land evaluation systems discussed in this report can be readily applied at different map scales. However, it is essential that interpretation of the results is done in context of the map scale at which the land characteristics used in the land evaluation systems are collated and delineated.
Land suitability assessments made using data from PNGRIS are only relevant for planning at national or provincial level. The land resource data in PNGRIS was compiled at 1:500 000 scale and is of insufficient detail for planning agricultural development at district, subdistrict or catchment levels. Land evaluation for planning at these levels should be based on resource data mapped at scales of 1:50 000 or 1:25 000, respectively (Basher et al. 1995). Land suitability assessment for village development or site-specific agricultural projects requires land resource data mapped at scales of 1:10 000 or larger.
39
5.3 Adjustment of rating criteria in relation to management conditions
Adaptations to the models may be required at different spatial scales and under different input management systems. At increasing levels of spatial detail, the assumed management inputs levels (or Land Utilization Type in the PNGLES models) will require increasing refinement for local crop production systems and management inputs. In applying the land evaluation systems, care should be taken in defining the management systems to which the systems are applied to ensure relevance of the suitability ratings generated.
5.4 Application of land evaluation models
The ALES-based models (PNGLES, Harding et al. (1986)) should be used in conjunction with appropriate land resource data to initially screen land suitability at national and provincial level using PNGRIS. They should then be used in conjunction with more detailed land resource data (e.g. 1:50 000) collected in areas of high potential to identify specific areas of development potential. Once such areas have been identified detailed site investigations of land suitability should be done in conjunction with other relevant factors such as availability of markets, investment, infrastructure, and transport. PLANTGRO is perhaps best used to complement the ALES-based models at this detailed, site-specific stage of the agricultural development process to assess specific soils, crop species and combinations under a particular set of well documented climatic conditions.
5.5 Future model development
Once the existing models have been more widely validated and applied, additional parameters of importance for production of specific crops could be added to improve their predictive ability. For example, climatic criteria (e.g. rainfall, rainfall seasonality, humidity, temperature) could be used to predict general likelihood of pest and disease occurrence for specific crops.
Addition of new parameters and their testing should be done in conjunction with agronomists and crop specialists with experience of specific crops in different parts of PNG.
40
6. CONCLUSIONS
The framework for computerized land evaluation systems in PNG have been established by the development of PNGLES (Venema and Daink 1986), the arabica coffee model of Harding et al. (1986), and the test application of PLANTGRO (Hackett 1991) in conjunction with PNGRIS. However, the systems applied during this study require ongoing validation in different parts of PNG. This should be done by comparison of crop yield data with suitability ratings generated by the land evaluation systems. This should be done in collaboration with local agronomists and crop production specialists.
Results of the analyses for arabica coffee production indicate that use of median ratings for environment subclasses downgrade suitability ratings compared to analysis on an RMU-by-RMU basis. This is caused by use of the median rating for each environment subclass whose value reflects the generally more common lower suitability classes in an environment unit and downgrades the RMUs which (on an individual basis) have higher suitability ratings.
The aggregation of ratings using the environment class approach are useful for very broad scale analysis of crop suitability. However, calculation of ratings on an RMU basis provide a more reliable estimate of crop suitability because the ratings are directly related to the land resource data in each RMU rather than averaged for all RMUs in a particular environment subclass.
Wider correlation of the PNGLES and Harding et al. (1986) arabica coffee models should be conducted. Appropriate adjustments should be made to each model to ensure improved consistency between the ratings produced by each model.
The development of PNGLES and the Harding et al. (1986) coffee model in the ALES framework makes them well suited to land evaluation in association with computerized land resource databases such as PNGRIS and the Upper Ramu database (Trangmar et al. 1995b). The work done in this study of developing procedures to extract soil data from PNGRIS for use in PLANTGRO should be expanded on to make PLANTGRO more widely applicable with PNGRIS. This will require revision of data input/output formats in PLANTGRO to make it more compatible with relational databases and applicable with land resource survey data.
The crop suitability ratings based on PNGRIS in this study should only be used for agricultural development planning at national scale. Investigations for agricultural development at provincial, district, subdistrict and site-specific levels should be conducted at more detailed scales.
41
REFERENCES
Bellamy, J.A. (compiler). 1986. Papua New Guinea inventory o f natural resources, population distribution and land use handbook. CSIRO Division of Water and Land Resources, Natural Resources Series No. 6 (CSIRO: Melbourne).
Bleeker, P. 1975. Explanatory notes to the land limitation and agricultural land use potential map o f Papua New Guinea. CSIRO Australian Land Research Series 36.
Bleeker, P. 1983. Soils o f Papua New Guinea. CSIRO and ANU Press, Canberra.
Bleeker, P., and Freyne, D.F. 1981. Areas suitable for cocoa production in Papua New Guinea. CSIRO, Australia and Dept. Primary Industry, Papua New Guinea.
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). 1976. A framework for land evaluation. Soils Bulletin 32, Rome.
Haantjens, H.A. 1963. Land capability classification in reconnaissance surveys in Papua New Guinea. J. Aust. Inst. ofAgric. Sei. 29:104-107.
Haantjens, H.A. 1969. Agricultural land classification for New Guinea land resources surveys. Second revised edition. CSIRO Division of Land Research Tech. Mem. 86/4. Canberra.
Haantjens, H.A., Reynders, J.J., Mouthaan, W.L.P.J., and van Baren, F.A. 1967. Major soil groups o f New Guinea and their distribution. Communication No. 55, Department of Agriculture Research, Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam.
Hackett, C. 1988. Matching plants and land: Development o f a general broadscale system from a crop project for Papua New Guinea. CSIRO Division of Water and Land Resources, Natural Resources Series No. 11, Melbourne.
Hackett, C. 1991. PLANTGRO - A software package for the coarse prediction o f plant growth. CSIRO Publications, Melbourne. 242 p.
Harding, P.E., Bleeker, P. and Freyne, D.F. 1986. A handbook for land suitability evaluation for rainfed arabica coffee production in Papua New Guinea. Coffee Research Report 3. PNG Coffee Research Institute. 134 p.
Harding, P.E., Bleeker, P. and Freyne, D.F. 1987. Land suitability evaluation for rainfed arabicacoffee production: Western Highlands Province, Papua New Guinea. Coffee Research Report 4. PNG Coffee Research Institute.
Hartley, A.C., Aland, F.P., and Searle, P.G.E. 1967. Soil survey o f West New Guinea, the Balima- Tiauru area. Soil Survey Report No 1, DASF, Port Moresby.
McAlpine, J.R., Keig, G., and Short, K. 1975. Climatic tables for Papua New Guinea. CSIRO Division of Land Use Research Technical Paper 37. Canberra, Australia.
42
McAlpine, J.R. Unpub. Environments o f Papua New Guinea and their current use. Unpublished report.
Marques, M.R. 1994. Land suitability classification for small-holder coconut production in Papua New Guinea. M.Sc Thesis, University of Queensland. 191 p.
Radcliffe, D.J. 1983. Land evaluation for food crop production in Papua New Guinea. Paper presented at the 1st PNG Food and Nutrition Conference, Goroka, AFTSEMU Technical Report No. 2. Mendi.
Rossiter, D.G., and Van Wambeke, A.R. 1991. ALES Version 3 User’s Manual. Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Trangmar, B.B., Basher, L.R., Rijkse, W.C., and Jackson, R.J. 1995a. Land resource survey, Upper Ramu Catchment, Papua New Guinea. (AIDAB:CSIRO), PNGRIS Publication 3.
Trangmar, B.B., Basher, L.R., and Rijkse, W.C. 1995b. Land resource survey, Upper Ramu Catchment, Papua New Guinea: Database attributes. (AIDAB:CSIRO), PNGRIS Report 3.
Venema, J.H., and Daink, F. 1992. Papua New Guinea Land Evaluation System (PNGLES). AG:TCP/PNG/0152 Field Document 1. PNG Dept. Agriculture and Livestock, and Food and Agriculture Organization. 152 p.
Wayi, B.M. 1987. Development o f a land suitability classification system for cocoa in Papua New Guinea. M.S. Thesis. State University of Ghent, Belgium.
43
ANNEX 1: Procedures for extracting soils data from PNGRIS for entry to PLANTGRO
1. Introduction
PLANTGRO (Hackett 1991) is a computer program which generates semi-quantitative predictions of plant performance based on soil, climate and plant characteristic files. Linking PLANTGRO to PNGRIS data should allow prediction of physical crop suitabilities for many crops across many RMUs. However, constraints to doing this are:
• limitations in PLANTGRO input and output formats• PNGRIS does not contain all the data required to run PLANTGRO• inconsistencies in data definitions between PNGRIS and PLANTGRO
Any omissions from the PNGRIS database or the accuracy of the PLANTGRO models are not considered here. Such factors impact on the reliability of predictions obtained by linking PLANTGRO and PNGRIS, but not on the procedures of generating such predictions.
2. PLANTGRO input and output
PLANTGRO reads input data from ASCII text files in a strict format and writes data as text reports to a printer or text file. There is no facility for reading data from or writing predictions to databases in standard formats. A computer program (SOILOUT.EXE) was written to take data from a standard database (Paradox) table and write this out to a series of PLANTGRO soil files (one soil per record). The following fields are read from the Paradox table:
Name Name of PLANTGRO soil fileFullname Soil (site) name stored in PLANTGRO fileAeration PLANTGRO aeration codeBS Base saturation (%)CEC CEC (meq/100g)PRD Potential rooting depth (cm)P Olsen Phosphate (ppm)K Exchangeable K (meq/100g)Sal Salinity (dS/m)Slope Slope (degrees)DEPTHA Thickness of “A” horizon (cm)DEPTHB Thickness of “B” horizon (DEPTHA+DEPTHB=Potential rooting depth)DEPTHC Thickness of “infiltration zone"' (cm)AWCA Available water in A horizon (%)AWCB Available water in B horizon (%)DRWA Drainable water capacity in A horizon (%)DRWB Drainable water capacity in B horizon (%)DRWC Drainable water capacity in C horizon (%)TEXTA Texture of A horizon (PLANTGRO code)TEXTB Texture of B horizon (PLANTGRO code)TEXTC Texture of infiltration zone (PLANTGRO code)
Writing a computer program to convert PLANTGRO output to a standard database table for use with PNGRIS requires the computer program to interpret the PLANTGRO text output m a format suitable for input to a relational database and use with computer mapping software.
44
3. PNGRIS data
PNGRIS stores soil data for the three main soils within each RMU. Most of the soil data required byPLANTGRO is included in PNGRIS (subject to translation) or could be reasonably inferred fromPNGRIS data. The main exceptions are:
Slope PNGRIS records two slopes and three soils per RMU but does not indicate whichslopes apply to which soils. This must be inferred from user knowledge of soils and their likely slope class.
Layers PNGRIS stores an overall depth rating rather than the thicknesses of individual layersas required by PLANTGRO. This overall thickness must be arbitrarily split between the soil A and B horizons for input to PLANTGRO.
AWC Available water capacity (AWC) is required for the A and B layers in PLANTGRO.PNGRIS stores a rating for the cumulative AWC for three different rooting depths. The ratings are too coarsely stepped to allow estimation of the individual layer AWCs by difference. As a result, AWC must be estimated from texture.
DRWC Drainable water capacity was not included in the PNGRIS data. This was estimatedfrom the texture.
Infiltration ZonePNGRIS does not include any data about the infiltration zone' parameter used in PLANTGRO. The infiltration zone is an area below the rooting zone which may impede soil drainage and lead to seasonal water-logging if its drainable water capacity or total thickness is sufficiently low. A constant infiltration zone of 1 m can generally be assumed with texture, AWC and DRWC the same as the B horizon.
4. Data inconsistencies between systems
The PNGRIS and PLANTGRO data formats differ in several ways. PLANTGRO uses numeric estimates for most properties while PNGRIS stores ratings. The PLANTGRO models are not particularly sensitive to the precise value of each input parameter. The level of precision in the PNGRIS data is probably adequate for most PLANTGRO applications.
A series of lookup tables were created converting the PNGRIS data code to one or more PLANTGRO soil parameters. Each lookup table was given fields named CODE giving the PNGRIS code, DESC giving the corresponding description, and one or more other fields giving the corresponding PLANTGRO soil characteristic(s)
45
The lookup tables are:
Table 1-1: Summary of lookup tables for converting PNGRIS soil data to PLANTGRO soil inputparameters
Lookup table PNGRIS field (CODE) Corresponding PLANTGRO field(s)
AVAILP AVAILP PGOLSEN Olsen Phosphate
BS BS PGBS Base Saturation
CEC CEC PGCEC Cation Exchange Capacity
DEPTH DEPTH PGDEPTH Potential rooting depth PGDEPTHA A horizon thickness PGDEPTHB B horizon thickness
DRAINAGE DRAINAGE PGAERAT PLANTGRO Aeration code
EXK EXCHK PGKX Exchangeable K
NITROGEN NITROGEN PGNIT Available Nitrogen
PH PH PGPH Soil pH
SALINITY SALINITY PGSAL Soil salinity
SLOPE SLOPE 1 or SLOPE2
PGSLOPE Slope
TEXTURE TEXTURE 1 or TEXTURE2
PGTEXT Texture (PLANTGRO code) PGAWC Available water capacity PGDRWC Drainable water capacity
5. Procedure for generating PLANTGRO Predictions
The following procedure was used to generate PLANTGRO predictions for arabica coffee, sweetorange, pineapple, Irish potato and lesser yam for each of the 57 soils within the 19 RMUs in the UpperRamu catchment. Climate data was taken from the Aiyura climate station in all cases.
The main steps were:
1. Data for the 57 soils in the 19 RMUs were extracted from the PNGRIS data file
2. The SLOPE 1 and SLOPE2 values from the PNGRIS data file were inserted into the extracted soil file and one of these was manually selected for each soil This selection was a “best guess'’ taking account of the erodibihty ratings of the soils and the presumed relative frequencies (soil 1 > soil2 > soil3). Only one RMU had SLOPE 1 and SLOPE2 values differing by more than one class so errors in this allocation were probably not critical.
3. The lookup tables were used to generate a new (Paradox) table with the PLANTGRO codes in the format required by the SOILOUT program. The name fields were generated from the RMU and soil numbers.
46
4. The SOILOUT.EXE program was run to produce PLANTGRO soil files for each of the 57 soils.
5. PLANTGRO program was run (using the multiple predictions option) to generate the 285 predictions (57 soils, 5 plants).
Results of the test application of PLANTGRO on PNGRIS RMUs is summarized in Section 4.4 of the main report.
6. Limitations to using PLANTGRO with a large dataset
Steps 1, 3 and 4 in the above procedure can be readily performed on a much larger number of soils. However, step 2 requires manual inspection of each soil and therefore requires more effort if a large number of soils were involved. The effort was relatively minor (at least for the 57 soils tested). Many plant files may not be markedly dependent on slope (erosion hazard should be considered separately) and it may, in fact, be acceptable to simply use the dominant (or mean) slope for all soils in an RMU.
The main limitation to running a much larger (e.g. 1000 soils) data set would be running PLANTGRO and interpreting the results. Even in the multiple prediction model PLANTGRO requires each soil, crop and climate file to be specified and has a limit of 7 soil files per run. Future developments of PLANTGRO should provide output formats which are compatible with data input and output formats which are readily compatible with relational databases for using with computer mapping packages.
7. Computer programmes
The computer programmes developed to extract PLANTGRO data from PNGRIS (SOILOUT.EXE, lookup tables) have been installed on computers in DAL Land Use Section.
ANNEX 2: Definitions of PNGRIS attributes used to define environment subclasses
Defimtions of the 'Inundation type’ environment subclasses
In u n d a t io n ty p e P N G R IS c o d e
L it t le o r n o in u n d a t io n 0 ,1 ,2
S e a s o n a l 3 ,4
P e r m a n e n t 5 ,6
T id a l 7 ,8
Definitions of the 'Slope' environment subclasses
S lo p e c la s s P N G R IS c o d e
L o w (< 1 0 ° ) 1 ,2 ,3
M o d e r a te (1 0 -2 0 ° ) 4
H ig h (< 2 0 ° ) 5 ,6
Definitions of the 'Rock type' environment subclasses
R o c k ty p e P N G R IS c o d e
A l lu v ia l d e p o s i ts 4 1 ,4 5
O ld e r s e d m ie n ts 4 0 ,1 2
P y ro c la s tic s 4 6
Definitions of the 'Dominant rock type' environment subclasses
D o m in a n t ro c k ty p e P N G R IS c o d e
N o i l - c a lc a re o u s s e d im e n ta ry 1 1 ,1 2 ,1 3
C a lc a r e o u s s e d im e n ta r y 14 ,15
M e ta m o r p h ic 2 1 ,2 2 ,2 3
A c id to i n te r m e d ia te ig n e o u s 3 0 ,3 2 -3 5 ,3 8 ,4 6
B a s ic ig n e o u s 3 1 ,3 6 ,3 7
48
ANNEX 3: Summary of crop suitability ratings for PNGRIS RMUs and median environmentsubclasses according to PNGLES
Key to Abbreviations:
Province:
WES Western MOR MorobeGUL Gulf MAD MadangCEN Central ESK East SepikMIL Milne Bay WSK West SepikNTH Northern MAN ManusSHY Southern Highlands NIR New IrelandENG Enga ENB East New BritainWHY Western Highlands WNB West New BritainSIM Simbu NSL North SolomonsEHY Eastern Highlands ALLPNG Totals for the whole of PNG
Crop:
card Cardamom cash Cashewchil Chillie citr Citruscoco Cocoa cocn Coconuth2cof Harding et al. (1986) arabica coffee modelrcof Robusta coffee maiz Maizemango Mango oilp Oil palmpepp Pepper pine Pineapplepota Irish potato pyre Pyrethrumricevani
Suffixes:
RiceVanilla
rubb Rubber
lo Low input managementhi High input management
Suitability ratings:
1 High2 Moderate3 Marginal4 Unsuitable
LUCL
ED.
EN
V
' %
are
a
0.0
0.5
75.5
20.7 0.0
3.2
73.3
20.7 0.1
3.7
71.7
20
8 12
5.1
69.6
20.7 0.5
4.6
16.1
77.7 0.0
7.2
37.5
54.5 0.1
7.1
37.5
54.5 6.9
0.0
0.1
93.1 Ol o o
co ö ^ T-ro co
O CNö in
Till
R
AT
ING
S B
Y M
E%
area
ar
ea(k
m2) 0
178
2529
169
52
010
8724
555
6952 31
1225
2402
569
68 408
1720
2331
569
52 157
1547
5380
2602
6 024
2612
573
1824
8 3123
9512
573
1824
8
2296
0 1831
197
2150
1036
032
020
447 0
1737
0.0
7.9
63.7
28.4 T— T— in co
O N CD CD CD CN
0.7
8.0
56.7
34.6 1.3
13.3
59
.1
26 3 m h- o r-
o m (D N 0.2
8.0
33.7
58
0 0.3
8.0
33.2
58.5
11.1
0
4 0.
0 88
.5
11.0
19
.1
1.0
68 9 in 05
o
FtA
TIN
GS
BY
Rr
ty
area
ig
(km
2)
026
3721
341
9533 26
2393
2227
988
13 241
2672
1900
311
595
434
4461
1981
088
06 184
1904
5369
2605
4 7826
7911
301
1945
3
110
2665
1111
819
618
3719 13
5 029
657
3693
6413 33
123
074
156
2655
t- CN CO tT T - (N CO ^ T - CN CO TT T - CN CO t T T - CN CO N- T - CN CO N- T - CN CO TT T - CN CO TT T- CN CO N- T - CN
s ' i s03 »-
1
chil_
loc
hilj
och
il_lo
ch
iljo
cit
rjo
cit
rjo
cit
rjo
cit
rjo
co
co
joc
oc
ojo
CO
CO
jO
coco
_lo O O O O
I I I I c c c cCJ CJ o oo o o oCJ (J o u h
2co
f_lo
h2
cof_
loh
2co
f_lo
h2
cofJ
o
crop
card
_lo
card
_lo
card
_lo
card
_lo
cash
_lo
cash
_lo
ca
sh
joc
as
hjo
coco
_hi
coco
_hi
coco
_hi
coco
_hi
h2co
f_hi
h2co
f_hi
h2co
f_h
ih2
cof_
hi
rcof
_hi
rcof
_hi
pro
vin
ce er er er r r O o o o 2 ^ ^ ^
er er er er o O o O ^ ^ ^ ^
er er er er O O O O 2 2 2 2
er er er er o O O O 2 ^ ^ ^
er er er er O O O O ^ ^ S
er er er er O O O O^ ^ ^ ^
er er er er O O O O2 2 2 2
er er er er O o o o 2 2 2 2
er er er er o O O O 2 2 2 2 M
OR
MO
R
LUCL
hLU 03
0 0
0.0
48.7
50.7 0 0
0.8
47.9
50
.7 0 0
22 0
27
.1
50 8 0.0
21.4
27.5
50
6 0.0
39.2 3.1
55.7 0.0
39 2
7.
3 52
9 0.0
39.7
6
8 52
.9 o o o o o o o o
o o o o o o o o
0Z
Z
0 0
U
RA
TIN
GS
BY
ME
D%
area
ar
ea
%(k
m2) 0 0
4688
448
812 0
810
4610
048
812 0
2121
826
127
4891
5 020
589
2645
748
677 0
3770
730
3253
631 0
3770
770
6150
955 0
3827
065
0650
955 0 0 0
9626
0 1
0 0 096
260 0
2115
2
0.0
0.0
65.1
34.9 0.2
23.3
41.6
34.9 0 0
38 8
26
2
35 0 0.0
20.1
45
.1
34 8 0.0
38 8
21
.739
4 0 0
38 8
24
1
37.1 CN CN m T—
o cd cd r- n co
o o o o o o o o
o
o o o o o o o o
LL
Z
0 0
TIN
GS
BY
RM
ar
ea
(km
2) 0 1662
668
3360
2
225
2240
440
055
3360
2 037
338
2522
133
727 0
1932
943
402
3355
5 037
378
2093
037
978 0
3737
823
221
3568
7
220
5415
462
2535
687 16 10 0
9626
0 16 10 096
260 0
3632
5
2
r - (N fO T f r - (N CO ^ T - CN CO TT T - CN CO N - T - CN CO N- T— CN co CN CO ^ T - CN CO N- r- (N CO t- CN
1
ch
iljo
ch
iljo
ch
iljo
ch
iljo
cit
rjo
citr
_lo
citr
_lo
cit
rjo o o o o
I I I I o o o oO O O CJo o o oO O CJ o
o o o o 1 1 1 1
c c c c (J O CJ oo o o oO CJ (J o h
2co
fJo
h2co
f_lo
h2
cofJ
oh2
cof_
lo
Z ' Z 'o o o o
crop
card
Jo
c
ard
jo
ca
rdjo
c
ard
jo
ca
sh
joc
as
hjo
ca
sh
joc
as
hjo
coco
_hi
coco
_hi
coco
_hi
coco
_hi
h2co
f_hi
h2
cof_
hh2
cof_
hih2
cof_
hi
OCO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO co co co co co co co co co co co co co co co co co co co co co co co co CD CD CO CO CD CD
,E£
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 $ § § 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
ING
S B
Y R
MU
R
ATI
NG
S B
Y M
ED
. E
NV
. TY
PE
R
ATI
NG
S B
Y R
MU
R
ATI
NG
S B
Y M
ED
. E
NV
. TY
PE
ED.
EN
V.
'
% ar
ea
22.9
70.8 0.6
5.1
52.3
37.5 0.0
7.4
6.7
85.7 0.1
3.1
73.3
20.7 3.0
2.2
16.6
77.1 2.5
3.3
39.4
53.9 0.0
5.8
33.7
59.7 1.2
9.3
72.5
13.8 0.0
0.9
39.9
53.0 0.0
0.0
54.5
42.8
V/IU
R
ATI
NG
S B
Y M
E%
area
ar
ea(k
m2)
7686
2373
0
194
1713
1751
212
550 0
2470
2250
2870
3 4010
4724
555
6952
1011 72
355
6525
841
854
1121
1321
018
063 0
1945
1128
520
017
412
3109
2430
446
41
031
413
376
1777
2 0 018
268
1434
2
25.4
66.2 0.9
8.0
51.0
40.1 in oo r t co
ö id o cd 0.6
6.6
66.5
26.3 3.3
3.0
13.6
80.1 2.6
4.4
34.6
58.3 0.2
6.4
31.5
61.8 1.0
16.2
51.6
31.2 0.0
2.8
40.8
56.3 0.0
0.5
43.6
55.9
cd
“ s S TCO s £CD m jc2 ~
i =
8507
2219
3
298
2692
1709
213
429
171
1945
3469
2792
6
197
2222
2227
988
13
1107
1021
4541
2684
2
884
1485
1160
919
533 79
2150
1056
120
721
334
5413
1730
510
459 16
954
1368
218
859 0
156
1462
318
732
2
> , D ) CO TJ- t- cm co m - T - CM CO tT t - CM CO T - CM CO t J- T - CM CO T f t - CM CO t * T - CM CO TT CM CO T f T - OJ CO I f
5 ra
5
rco
fjorc
ofjo
rcof
_lo
rcof
_lo
ma
ng
jom
an
gjo
man
g_lo
man
g_lo
oilp
joo
ilpjo
oilp
joo
ilpjo
pe
pp
jop
ep
pjo
pe
pp
jop
ep
pjo
pin
ejo
pin
ejo
pin
ejo
pin
ejo
crop
o o o o
mai
z_hi
mai
z_h
mai
z_hi
mai
z_hi
oilp
_hi
oilp
jiio
ilpjii
oilp
jii
po
tajii
pota
_hi
pota
_hi
po
tajii
pyr
ejo
pyr
ejo
pyr
ejo
pyr
ejo
prov
ince
MO
RM
OR cd cd cd ad
O O O O ^ ^ ^ ^
Cd Cd Od Cd O O O O ^ ^ ^ ^
Cd Cd Cd Cd O O O O 2 2 2 2
Cd Cd Cd Cd O O O O ^ 2 ^ S
Cd Cd Cd Cd O O O O 2 2 2 2
Cd Cd Cd Cd O O O O ^ ^ ^ ^
Cd Cd Cd Cdo o o o s ^ 2 ^
Cd Cd Cd Cd O O O O S S ^ ^
Cd Cd Cd Cdo o o o ^ ^ ^
LUCL
s iLU TO 21
.954
.7 0.0
22.0
26.1
50.7 0.1
0.0
38.4
60.3 0.0
0.8
47.9
50.7
16.7
46
.3
14 6
19
5 0.0
39.0
39.9
16.7 0.0
39 6
6.
7 53
.6 0.0
22.1
26.7
50.7 0.0
0.0
43.4
54.6 0.0
0.0
0.4
99.1
QLU
> -
U Ft
ATI
NG
S B
%ar
ea
area
(km
2)
2108
552
670 0
2121
825
151
4881
2
129 0
3696
658
064 O O O CM
CO ■<— CO CD 0 0 16
051
4461
614
012
1873
1 037
578
3842
416
055 0
3814
164
9751
648 0
2124
425
707
4878
0 0 041
834
5253
5 0 040
095
457
24.1
38.2 0.0
38.8
25.6
35.7 0.4
0.1
55.6
43.9 0.2
23.3
41.6
34.9 O (D ^ O
O CO CO t—lO ^
0.0
41.2
39.7
19.1 0.0
39.0 6.5
54.5 0.2
38.6
26.2
35.0 0.0
0.0
62.0
38.0 o o cd m-
O O (\i N CD
:>Cd
&CO «1 ^CD2F
2317
736
784 0
3732
224
633
3433
1
349 67
5358
242
288
225
2240
440
055
3360
2 053
8451
457
3944
5 039
649
3822
018
417 0
3756
162
2552
500
220
3712
825
248
3369
0 0 059
676
3661
0 0 1024
7293
804
£
2 ? «? CO TJ- T - cm m -<j- T - CM CO TT T - CM CO T - CN CO T - CN CO TT T - CM CO T t T - CM CO TT T - CM CO ^ T - cm r o tj-
i ' - s .-2 L-3
“ lo o o o
o o o o
o o o o o u o o
ma
ng
jom
an
gjo
ma
ng
jom
an
gjo
oilp
joo
ilpjo
oilp
joo
ilpjo
pe
pp
jop
ep
pjo
pe
pp
jop
ep
pjo
pin
ejo
pin
ejo
pin
ejo
pin
ejo
pyr
ejo
pyr
ejo
pyr
ejo
pyr
ejo
crop
mai
z_hi
mai
z_hi
mai
z_hi
mai
z_hi
oilp
jiio
ilpjii
oilp
jiio
ilpjii
po
tajii
pota
_hi
po
tajii
po
tajii
o CO CO CO CO CO CO c p cp CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO
,E£ 5 5 5 5 5 5 § § § § 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
RA
TIN
GS
BY
RM
U
RA
TIN
GS
BY
ME
D
EN
V T
YP
E
RA
TIN
GS
BY
RM
U
RA
TIN
GS
BY
ME
D.
ENV.
TY
PE
ED.
ENV.
%
are
a
1.7
3.3
36.6
56.1 0.0
7.7
21 0
70
.8 0.0
8 8
48 8
37
.5 1.2
4.6
39 0
54
5 0.3
0.1
65.3
27.9 0.0
1.0
64.8
27.9 3.3
11.1
44
937
.3 4.9
10 4
50
4
27.9 CD CO O CD
T f O ) i f j O CO
COco
m S ™co 2: p G i 2:1-
585
1121
1225
718
792 0
2571
7035
2373
0 029
3516
361
1255
0
389
1556
1305
418
248 84 23
1870
979
83 029
618
580
7983 944
3184
1287
310
681
1397
2967
1445
279
83
1328
2739
1437
2309
7
944
VIU
RP%
area 1.
85.
235
.857
.2 0.0
11.2
22.1
66.7 0.0
12 0
47
.4
40.6
2 09 LZZ C 9 6 0 0.
30.
365
.434
.0 0.0
1.7
64.7
33.6 3 2
16.9
40
6
39.3 4.7
15.4
46.6
33.3 N t T O (7)
CO CD N CNCNCO
e r
“ s £g ra
p
613
1731
1200
219
165 1
3749
7403
2235
8 140
3815
878
1359
4
289
2102
1094
720
173 84 78
1875
597
44 1348
918
541
9618 92
748
4711
624
1126
3
1333
4426
1335
295
50
1058
4690
2013
2090
0
914
S
>■ g> T - cNj co r - (N CO ^ r - CN CO T f T - CNI CO T - CN CO tJ- T - (N CO N- T - CN CO N- T - CN CO T t T - o j co
S cS iS1
rub
bjo
rubb
_lo
rubb
_lo
rubb
_lo
van
ijova
nijo
van
ijova
nijo
card
joca
rdjo
card
joca
rdjo
cash
joca
shjo
cash
joca
shjo
chilj
och
iljo
chilj
och
iljo
citr_
loci
tr_lo
citr_
loci
trjo
crop
rice_
hiric
e_hi
rice_
hiric
e_hi
rub
bjii
rubb
_hi
rubb
_hi
rubb
_hi
coco
_hi
coco
_hi
coco
_hi
coco
_hi
coco
jo
prov
ince c c e r e r e r
O O O O: > ^ ^ ^
e r e r e r e r O O O O 2 5 2 2
e r e r e r e r O O O O: > ^ ^ ^
e r e r e r e r O O O O 2 2 2 2
Q O D O < < < < ^ 12 2 ^
Q O Q Q < < < <
Q Q Q Q < < < < 2 2 2 2
Q Q O O < < < < 2 2 2 2
Q Q Q Q < < < < 5 2 2 2 M
AD
UJCL
i iLU
0.1
219
55.9
18
3 0 0
39.7
4
154
.7 0.0
39.7 8 4
50.7 0.0
39.6 6.9
52.9 0 0
0 0
54.0
39
.8 0.0
0 1
52.2
39
.7 0.0
3 0
47.9
42
9 0.0
2.6
51.5
39.7 0.6
5.7
17.4
67.1
90
QLU
>
U R
ATI
NG
S B
%ar
ea
area
(km
2) 129
2104
153
807
1763
5 038
270
3967
5267
0 038
270
8099
4881
2 038
141
6626
5095
5 0 018
267
1348
4 9 3717
652
1342
7 010
1816
202
1453
1 088
017
444
1342
7
217
1919
5876
2271
2
217
0.4
20.7
58.8
20
.1 0.0
56 5
5
3 38
.2 0.0
56.5 7.9
35.7 0.0
39.0
23
937
.1 0.0
0.1
51.4
48
4 0.0
04
51.3
48.3 0.3
3.8
44.6
51.3 0.3
2.6
48 8
48
.3 0.6
8.7
22 8
67
.8
90
TIN
GS
BY
RM
ar
ea
(km
2)
349
1993
756
660
1934
0 054
374
5128
3678
4 054
374
7581
3433
1 037
561
2303
835
687 0 47
1740
916
391 9
135
1736
916
334 90
1295
1509
517
367 90 893
1653
016
334
201
2948
7734
2296
4
201
2
T - CN CO T t T - CN CO Tf r * ( N CO N- T - CN CO T t T - CN CO tT T - CN CO N- T - CN CO N" T - CN CO N- T - CM CO
5 ro i S
1
rub
bjo
rub
bjo
rub
bjo
rub
bjo O O O O
I I I I c c cz c= co cö ca ca > > > > ca
rdjo
card
joca
rdjo
card
jo
cash
joca
shjo
cash
joca
shjo
chilj
och
iljo
chilj
och
iljo
citr_
loci
trjo
citr
joci
trjo
crop
rice_
hiric
e_hi
rice_
hiric
e_hi
rubb
_hi
rubb
_hi
rubb
_hi
rubb
_hi
coco
_hi
coco
_hi
coco
_hi
coco
_h
coco
jc
prov
ince co co co co
LU LU LU LUco co co coUJ LU LU LU
§ § § §
co co co coLU LU LU LU
§ § § §
co co co coLU LU UJ LU
§ § § §
__i _i __i __iD D D D G G G G
_i __i __i __iD D D D G O O O
__i __i __i _iZ> => D Z ) G O O O
_i __i _i _iD D D D G G G G
__i __i __i __iD D D DG G G G G
UL
ING
S B
Y R
MU
R
ATI
NG
S B
Y M
ED.
EN
V.
TYP
E
RA
TIN
GS
BY
RM
U
RA
TIN
GS
BY
ME
D.
ENV.
TY
PE
ED
. E
NV
.
% a
rea cd ^ m o o ) T t m o m N- 00 N- •<— oo m CO N 03 CO T - CO T f O O CO 03 CO 00 OO Tj- cn
T - CO oo ^ CO
O ) i n co co TJ- CO
o CO03
CN in03
CO y - y f Ö 00
CO T - CO N T - Tj- CN
co co co in co
O T - T f N CD CN
O t T O CO O ) !£) f f l
2
CO O i n CO Tj- O IDn co
CO T t CN T -
os
CO CO O O CN 03 CO CD
03 CN CD N" CD CO N h -
03 CN 03 CO CD N O ) CO
T f 03 c o m N- O N- (D
O CD O CO 03 CO CO
O 03 N i n 03 00 OO CO
26
81
19
88
39
57
8 s !co tj- oCO (N T -
i n CD TT oCM t— CN t—
n - CNCO
N - CD N- 03 r - CO O CO T - co
03 CO CO 03 CO CO N
03 CO 03 N* CN TT
CN i n 03oo r^-
O CO o o co ^— co ^—
2 -
h -
s
03<DTO
= > *
CN CN CN CN CN
CD T - T - CD CO ▼” a> r ^ o CO P CO T f T - T - i n co 03 tj- i n r- N i n N O 00 N CD CN N- CD 00 CN CN COCD CD t— t— co ^ r
CO r - CO T -t- CO N"
o o o CO03
T - CO o m03
Tf CD CO r- T- h-
T f CD CN CD T - N - CO
CO 03 T f CN 00
▼“ o T t co CD CO
T f N CN m T- t— CD
O CN COT- T- rj-
a :
“ S§ CO t— CO LO — N
CD CN CN CO ^ (N N
T - COm o
o
37
1
85
1 tt m co m
03 CO N- O CO O CO CO
03 i n CO 03co N" m co
89
1
27
81
12
86
23
70
3 N- 00 T- CO CO N” t—
03 CN N COcd co o m
i n oo 'T- T- O CN
8 ™ 1 2 ""
N CN N i n c o o nCN CO t— t—
CN CN CNCOCN
co
CN
r - CD ^ ^ ▼— N - CN O
CN
T- CO r- Tj-T- TJ- CN O
CN CN m CD CO 03
O T- CD CO TT CN CO CO
03 m tj- CN CO CN
& ¥ CN CO tJ- T- CN co n - T- CN CO Tf T- CN ro ■<? t— CN CO T- CN CO N- CN CO T- CN CO N- T- CN CO N- T- CN CO
TO »—
1
coco
_lo
coco
_lo
coco
_lo
h2
cof_
loh
2co
f_lo
h2
cof_
loh
2co
f_lo
rco
f_lo
rco
fjo
rco
f_lo
rco
fjo
ma
ng
_lo
ma
ng
_lo
ma
ng
_lo
ma
ng
_lo
oilp
_lo
oil
pjo
oil
pjo
cro
p
co
cn
joc
oc
njo
cocn
_lo
cocn
_lo
h2
cof_
hi
h2
cof_
hi
h2
cof_
hi
h2
cof_
hi
rco
f_h
irc
of_
hi
rco
f_h
irc
of_
hi
ma
iz_
hm
aiz
_h
ma
iz_
hm
aiz
_h
oilp
_h
io
ilp_
hi
oilp
_h
io
ilp_
hi
pro
vin
ce
MA
DM
AD
MA
D
MA
DM
AD
MA
DM
AD Q Q D D
< < < < 2 2 2 2
0 0 0 0 < < < < 2 2 2 2
Q Q O O < < < < 2 2 2 2
Q Q D Q < < < < 2 2 2 2 M
AD
MA
DM
AD
MA
D Q Q O O < < < < 2 2 2 2
O D O O < < < < 2 2 2 2 MA
DM
AD
MA
D
LUCL
8 5LU TO
5.7
42
.04
2.8 0.7
5.7
41
.94
2.8 o o o o
o o o o
Z 66 C
O
0 0 0 0 0.1
2.5
23
.867
.0
0.1
2.9
51.1
39
.7 O CO CN O O CD
r-COoo 0
.00.
15
2.2
39
.7
0.9
15
.334
.14
2.7 0.8
1
5.4
58
6
TIN
GS
BY
ME
D
are
a
%(k
m2
)
19
19
14
22
31
45
00
24
71
91
91
41
93
14
50
0 O O O hj-COCOCO
0 09
33
37
54 37
84
38
04
52
26
91 37
981
17
30
61
34
27 9
25
82
08
33
00
10 9
371
76
52
13
42
7
29
25
19
31
15
29
14
45
6
25
85
22
71
98
24
CTTOCD
TO 8.7
39
.25
1.4 X- co
00
39.1
51
.4 o o o o o o o o
8 66 0 0 Z
O
0 0 0.2 2.3
29
.96
7.6
0.2 3.9
47
.24
8.7 0.1
1.3
7.2
91
.4
0.0
0.4
51
.34
8.3 2.1
9.8 3.3
84
.8 3.5
11
.75
4.9
TIN
GS
BY
are
a
(km
2)
29
61
13
27
8
17
40
7
37
52
81
7
13
24
81
74
07 0 0 0
33
84
7 06
0 03
37
87 71
77
4
10
11
02
28
92 71
13
14
15
96
61
64
96
43
43
3
24
22
30
94
9 91
35
17
36
91
63
34
69
8
33
33
11
15
28
70
1
11
76
39
70
18
59
4
RA
su
ita
bil
ity
rati
ng CN CO Tf i - CN CO "<T T- CN CO tT CN CO Tf T- CN CO Tf t- cn co n - T- CN CO Tt CN CO N- ^ (N CO Tf T- CN CO
cro
p o o oI I I
o o o o o o o o o o o o c
oc
njo
co
cn
jo
co
cn
joc
oc
njo
h2
co
f_h
i
h2
co
f_h
ih
2c
of_
hi
h2
co
f_h
i
h2
co
fJo
h2
co
f_lo
h2
co
f_lo
h2
co
f_lo
rco
fjii
rco
f_h
i
rco
f_h
irc
of_
hi o o o o
JJJJo o o o o u u o
ma
iz_
hi
ma
iz_
hi
ma
iz_
hi
ma
iz_
hi
ma
ng
_lo
ma
ng
jom
an
gjo
ma
ng
jo
oil
p_h
io
ilp
_hi
oil
p_h
i
oil
p_h
i
oil
pjc
oil
pjc
oil
pjc
8.E G
UL
GU
L
GU
L _i _i _i _iO ID O O O O 0 CD
_i _i _i _iZD 3 3 O O O O Ü
_i _i _i _iD D D D O O O Ü
_i _i _i _iDD DD DD DD O O O O
_I _I _I _ID D D D O 0 Ü O
_i _i _i _iD D D D O O CD 0
_i _i _i _iD O D D0 0 0 0
_i _i _i _iD D D D 0 0 CD 0 G
UL
GU
L
GU
L
RA
TIN
GS
BY R
MU
R
ATI
NG
S BY
MED
. EN
V. T
YPE
R
ATI
NG
S BY
RM
U
RA
TIN
GS
BY M
ED.
ENV
. TY
PEED
. EN
V. ‘
% a
rea
31.6 9.0
4.8
43.2
39.8 4 3
10 3
44
8
37.3 0.0
0.4
20 5
78
9 O O O to 0 0 ( 0 0
ct)
4.7
7.7
15.5
71
.9 o N m m o i n co o
T - 00
0.0
16.4
45.5
27
.9 9.0
4.8
44.4
38.5 0.0
0.0
39.1
59.2
VIU
RA
TIN
GS
BY M
E%
area
ar
ea(k
m2)
9056
2573
1388
1237
211
409
1219
2955
1282
710
681 0
107
5886
2260
8 0 017
1325
969
1348
2214
4441
2059
8 045
1010
1723
074 0
4700
1304
079
83
2573
1388
1273
611
045 0 0
1702
625
764
co
5
7.9
12.4
37.3
42.4 4.3
16.6
41.7
37.4 0.0
0.4
29.4
70.2 O O CNJ 00
Ö Ö CT) d CT)
O) CD CN CO CD 00 T - CO
CN CD
0.0
21.0 7.7
71.3 0.0
21.8
41.7
36.5 8.0
12.4
38.6
41.1 0.0
0.2
35.6
64.2
Cd
“ S STco £ E ü ^
1 -
9817
2276
3560
1068
312
142
1236
4768
1194
310
714 0
107
8433
2012
1 0 026
2826
033
1969
2471
6084
1813
7 060
1222
1920
430 0
6249
1194
310
469
2294
3540
1104
911
778 0 67
1549
327
956
RA'
suita
bilit
yra
ting T - CNJ CO ^ t- CN CO Tf T - CN CO T t T - cm n tj- t- CM CO TJ- T— CM CO TJ- r - CM CO Tf •<- CN CO ■<- CM CO tJ-
crop
oilp
_lo
pepp
jope
ppjo
pepp
_lo
pepp
jo o o o o I I I I
(D <D <D Q) c c c cQ_ Q . Q . Q . po
ta_h
ipo
ta_h
ipo
ta_h
ipo
ta_h
i
pyre
jopy
rejo
pyre
jopy
rejo
rice_
hiric
e_hi
rice_
hiric
e_hi
rubb
_hi
rubb
_hi
rubb
_hi
rubb
_hi
rubb
joru
bbjo
rubb
joru
bbjo o o o o
I I I I c c c c ca ca ca co > > > > ca
rd Jo
ca
rd Jo
ca
rdjo
ca
rd Jo
o.E£
MA
D Q Q Q Q < < < < ^ ^ ^ ^
Q Q Q Q < < < < ^ ^ ^ S
Q O Q Q < < < < ^ S ^ S
Q Q Q Q < < < < ^ ^ ^ s
Q Q Q Q < < < < 2 2 2 2
Q Q Q Q < < < < ^ ^ ^ ^
Q Q Q Q < < < < 2 2 2 2
D O Q Q < < < < 2 2 2 2
m ^ x.CO CO CO CO LU LU LU UJ
o
> s CD CD CD o T - 0 3 CO TT O O N- O O O CO 03 T - N m cd O CO N - O O CO N N O CO O ) O O O O CNJ
z £LU TO
0 0 o in T- co O CM CM CMm r r
O O CD N CM CD
o o o r^r - CO
O Ö 0 3 CN N" N-
O CD N N T - CD
d to in öS ■<3- ro O CD T - CO O O O CT) C - CNI
QLU
CDCD
c o cd i n N o •<- h - mcd cm m mN - TT
o o mCM 03
o o co i n h - CD
CD ▼- o o i n ^ m cd oO CD N ' —
CO 0 3 0 3O (D (D N
CO O ) CMO CD CD N
c o cd m0 13 33 49CO >- F
o ro ^Z ~I -
C\lCD
CN CD T— mT - r j - t T
O ) c o c o r - T r
0 3 CD 0 0 CM
CN
N - h - CO 03
CM
CM N T f CD TT
r - 0 0 CO CN i n CN
CN
r - (N cm m c o
T - i nCM ^ t
0 3 D - O CO CM
2030)CO£
Z
CD 0 3 r - CD CN 0 3 N CM O O TT CD O O O O CM O O 00 O t O CD O M- 0 3 N CM CM T - (D O «r-00 r-CDCN
O CO 0 3 T -c o m
O CO 0 3 CD N - N-
O O CM N CO CD
O O co CM 0 3
O CM CN i n i n tj-
O O ) CO N CN CD
O 03 T— 0O N - N-
O 0 3 0 3 T—c o m
Ö CO Ö CD CD CO
2Cd
& 302
2851
1323
017
464 80
1322
1682
115
624 O O Is- O
CD 00o o cm m
CN CMO N ^ CD 0 0 CD 0 3 O
O CN CO CN N CO 0 3
O CN O ) CD h - Is- 03
CD CD T— i n O CM CD
O TT 0 3 m CN 0 3 0 3
CO ro t OzI—
o0 3 00 O CM T - CM
CM ^ CO
cd m m Is- m
— r coCO N CM
CMCO O- S
▼” CN ^ CO CO N
0 3 N00 o
<Cd
>N 0 3 N- T— CN CO N" T - CM CO r - CM CO T f r - CM CO M- CM CO N- T - CN CO T t t - CNJ CO NJ- r - CN CO N- T- CN CO N-1 1 03 »-
5
crop
oilp
jo
pep
pjo
pep
pjo
pep
pjo
pep
pjo
pin
ejo
pin
ejo
pin
ejo
pin
ejo
pot
ajii
pota
_hi
pota
_hi
pota
_hi
pyr
ejo
pyr
ejo
pyr
ejo
pyr
ejo
rice
_hi
rice
_hi
rice
_hi
rice
_hi
rubb
_hi
rubb
_hi
rubb
_hi
rubb
_hi
rubb
_lo
rubb
_lo
rub
bjo
rub
bjo
van
ijo
van
ijo
van
ijo
van
ijo
card
joca
rdjo
card
joca
rdjo
oE> G
UL _i _i _i _i
z> z> z z Ü Ü Ü Ü
_i _i _i _iZ Z Z 3 O O 0 0
_i _i _i _iZ Z Z Z 0 0 0 0
_i _i _i _iZ Z> Z) z> O 0 0 0
_i _i _i _i3 D D D Ü Ü O Ü
_i _i _i _iD D D D0 0 0 0
_i _i _i _iZ> Z Z> Z) 0 0 0 0
_i _i _i _iD 3 D D 0 O 0 0
z z z zLU UJ LU LUo o o o
NG
SB
YR
MU
R
ATI
NG
S B
Y M
ED
E
NV
. TY
PE
R
ATI
NG
S B
Y R
MU
R
ATI
NG
S B
Y M
ED.
ENV.
TY
PE
03(D
CD
1.
03CDCD
03CD
03CD
£|S1 a
3.6
5.9
29.4
59.2 0.0
11.4
24
.062
.5 0.0
9.8
28.9
59.2 3.6
7.9
1.1
86.6 3.6
6.3
25.1
63.0 3.6
7.9
23.5
63.0 o o o o
o d o oO CD CO CO Ö O Ö od
CJ)
0.0
11.4
1.
686
.5 0.0
11.4
1548
2567
1279
825
764 0
4963
1043
827
219 0
4266
1259
025
764
1551
3442 487
3768
1
1548
2748
1093
827
418
1548
3445
1024
127
418 19 0 0
4349
7 19 246 92
4297
4 049
63 676
3766
2 049
63
2.2
7.4
26.1
64.2 0.4
11.5
20.9
67.2 0.4
9.9
25.5
64.2 ■'f CD CO
c\i ch T- co 2.3
8.3
21.3
68
.0 CO CD OCM CD CD CO
r - CD
o o o o d d o d
6 86 ZO
6 0 0 0 0.
611
.3 2.1
86.0 0.4
11.5
973
3239
1134
827
956
162
4995
9098
2926
1
162
4304
1109
427
956
1025
4299 57
737
615
1022
3611
9273
2961
0
1022
4308
8576
2961
0 19 0 043
497 19
378 99
4302
0
241
4916 92
237
437
175
4988
T - CN CO ^ r- (\J CO ^ r - CNJ CO T f T - CM CO tT T - CM CO r- CM CO ^ v - CM CO T t T - CM CO ^ ■«— CO CO "S’ T - CM
cash
jcca
shjc
cash
jcca
shjc
chilj
cch
iljc
chilj
cch
iljc
citr
jcci
trjc
citr
jcci
trjc
coco
_hi
coco
_hco
co_h
ico
co_h
i O O O OI I I I
O O O O O O O (Jo o o o o cj o o
o o o oI I I I
c c c cCJ O (J oo o o oO O CJ o h2
cof_
hih2
cof_
hih2
cof_
hih2
cofJ
ii
h2co
f_lo
h2co
f_lo
h2co
fJo
h2co
fJo
rcof
_hi
rco
fjii
rcof
_hi
rco
fjii o o
o oo CJ
* * * ^ x. ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ it: ^ ^ * i4 *LU UJ LU UJ LU LU HI UJ UJ UJ HI UJ LU UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ LLl LLl LLl UJ UJ UJ LLl LU UJ LLl UJ UJ UJ UJ
0.7
4.2
66.3
28.6 0.9
5.0
63.9
28.6 0.9
4.9
65.1
28
6 0.2
5.0
4.9
89 8 0.9
5.0
47 8
46
.2 1.5
5.0
47 2
46
.2 0.4
116
0.1
87 8 0.6
33.4
1.
664
.4 1.9
4.0
4.1
89.4 CD CO
CM CO
205
1266
1984
785
66 264
1503
1910
885
66 264
1469
1949
185
66 5914
9014
5726
878
264
1490
1429
813
832
447
1490
1411
513
832
129
3480 39
2627
0
183
9998 482
1925
5
563
1204
1239
2674
9
768
999
0.9
11.4
56.7
30.9 1.4
13.8
49.5
35.3 1.6
12.5
55.6
30
.2 0.7
14.0 7.9
77.4 0.9
14.1
38
6
46.4 2.7
119
39.0
46
4 7.3
0.5
0.1
92.0 7.5
16.4 0.1
76.0 3.6
10.2
15.9
70.2 co m
T t CD
282
3419
1697
592
42 431
4119
1482
010
548
482
3752
1664
590
39 203
4202
2363
2315
0
278
4209
1155
813
873
795
3574
1167
613
873
2179 16
2 3927
538
2233
4899 39
2274
7
1083
3061
4769
2100
5
1288
2856
r - CN CO T f r- CN CO ^ T - CM CO T t r- CN CO ^ T - CM CO tT T- co co Tr v - CM CO T- (n n ' t cm co T - CO
cash
joca
shjo
cash
joca
shjo
chilj
och
iljo
chilj
och
iljo
citr
joci
trjo
citr
joci
trjo
coco
_hi
coco
_hi
coco
_hi
coco
_hi o o o o
I I I I o o o oO O CJ oo o o oCJ CJ CJ CJ co
cnjo
cocn
joco
cnjo
cocn
jo
h2co
f_hi
h2co
f_hi
h2co
f_hi
h2co
f_hi
h2co
fJo
h2co
fJo
h2co
fJo
h2co
fJo
rco
fjii
rcof
_hi
rcof
_hi
rcof
_hi o o
o o o u
Z Z Z Z UJ UJ UJ UJo o o o
z z z zUJ UJ UJ UJo o o o
z z z zUJ UJ UJ UJo o o o
z z z zUJ UJ UJ UJo o o o
z z z zUJ UJ UJ UJo o o o
z z z zUJ UJ UJ UJo o o o
z z z zLU UJ UJ UJ O O CJ (J
z z z zUJ UJ UJ UJ (J o o o
z z z zUJ UJ UJ UJo o o o C
EN
CE
N
NG
S BY
RM
U
RAT
ING
S BY
MED
. EN
V. T
YPE
R
ATIN
GS
BY
RM
U
RAT
ING
S B
Y M
ED.
ENV.
TYP
E
03<1)03
£
™ I
fi?03 £
S ro03 k -
03<D(5s?
sg™ J .
sg« I
£ £
S'-S03 * -
26.2
60.4 CD N N t D
co T- o co 03
3.6
5.9
29.4
59.2 00 CN CN O
T- cd ih in 0.2
12.0
34.6
51.4 0.0
2.0
30.1
65.5 3.6
8.4
23.5
62.5 O O t- T-
Ö Ö CO CD T- CO
O O O COo d CN
CD
9.5
1.6
14.0
74
.6
1138
226
275
1548 72
732
240
731
1548
2567
1279
825
764
780
7029
2258
3264
7 8052
0315
066
2238
4 087
813
116
2850
8
1548
3642
1021
127
219 0 0
5703
3748
2 0 086
142
563
4127 70
060
7132
448
22.4
65.7 2.3
1.8
2.3
93.5 2.2
7.4
26.1
64.2 0.0
2.3
24.2
73.6 0.5
12.7
31.5
55.2 0.0
3.1
28.1
68.8 2.4
10.0
20.4
67.2 OOTflD
o o ^ f i r i ■<- co 0.
00.
04.
295
.8 8.0
2.9
16.4
72.7
9768
2858
5
1015 79
310
0040
708
973
3239
1134
827
956 0
981
1052
432
011
215
5532
1372
924
040 7
1335
1221
529
959
1050
4333
8872
2926
1 0 062
8437
232 0 0
1811
4170
5
3485
1249
7154
3162
8
CO Tj- T- cm n tj- •<— CN CO T- CN CO T- CN CO Tt CN CO Tf CN CO TJ- T- CN CO-Tf T- CN CO ^ T- CM CO Tf
o o
. J * - 'o o o o
ma
iz_
hi
ma
iz_
hi
ma
iz_
hi
ma
iz_
hi
ma
ng
jo
ma
ng
jo
ma
ng
_lo
ma
ng
_lo
oilp
_h
i
oilp
_h
i
oilp
_h
i
oilp
_h
i
oil
pjo
oil
pjo
oil
pjo
oil
pjo
pe
pp
jo
pe
pp
jo
pe
pp
jo
pe
pp
jo
pin
ejo
pin
ejo
pin
ejo
pin
ejo
po
ta_
hi
po
ta_
hi
po
ta_
hi
po
ta_
hi
py
rejo
py
rejo
py
rejo
py
rejo
ric
e_
hi
ric
e_
hi
ric
e_
hi
ric
e_
hi
^ * * ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ * x . •*. x : ^ ^ * x . * ^
LU LU LU LU LU ID LU LU LU LU LU LU LU LU LU LU LU LU LU LU LU LU UJ LU LU LU UJ UJ LU UJ UJ LU LU LU LU LU LU LU
65.1
28.8
0.2 3.5
2.4
93.7 0.7
4.2
66.3
28.6
2.0 3.7
17.6
76.4 0.6
5.0
61.3
32.8 0.0
5.0
47.9
46.8 2.6
5.9
69.1
20.9
0.0 0.1
26.0
72.4 o CO
O O TT Tt CO CD
1.2
5.7
33.1
58.3
1949
186
26 5910
45 732
2804
8
205
1266
1984
785
66 597
1097
5280
2285
0
191
1503
1832
698
04
014
8714
320
1401
5
768
1760
2066
362
48
0 3977
8721
649 0 39
1019
819
238
362
1712
9912
1745
5
49.7
36
4 co m m co
Ö 03 T* in co
1.9
10.4
56.7
30.9 co m
CO CD N CN T- r -
2.8
6.6
49.1
41.4 0.0
10.7
36.8
52
.4 6.0
12.0
52.9
29.1 0.0
0.6
33.8
65.6 0.0
0.4
26.3
73.3 3.9
4.6
30.9
60.5
1487
310
901 75
2848
1336
2565
9
580
3121
1697
592
42
1127
1816
5297
2167
8
835
1985
1469
712
401 0
3214
1101
715
687
1802
3589
1582
687
01
017
910
105
1963
4 011
878
6621
934
1170
1379
9259
1811
0
CO Tt ■<- C\l CO TJ- t— CN 00 Tf T- CN CO N- CN CO N- T- CN co T- CN CO N- T- CN CO ^ r - CN CO N" T- (N M
o o
M-l M_ ' o o o o
x : _ c _ c I I I I
N N N N 03 03 03 03
E E E E
o o o o I I I I
CD 03 03 CJ) C C C C 03 03 03 03E E E E
-C .c -c .n I I I I
.9 - . 9 - . 9 - . 9 - o o o o
O O o o I I I I
.9 - . 9 - . 9 - . 9 - o o o o
o o o o I I I I
Cl Q. Q. Q. Q. Q. CL CL <D (D CD (D Q. Q. Q. Q.
O O O OI I I I
t i l lC £ £ £
t i l l03 Q3 TO 03
o o o o cl cl a . a
o o o oI I I I
qj a> <U Q)> . >* >> a a a a
r r c c I I I I
8 8 8 8o o c o
CD z z -Z .-Z .-Z .-Z . z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z zO LU UJ LU LU UJ UJ LU LU UJ LU LU LU LU LU LU LU LU LU LU LU UJ LU LU LU LU LU LU LU LU LU LU UJ LU LU LU UJ LU LU
§Q.
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o O o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o O O O O
LUQ.
£ED
. E
NV
. '
% a
rea
0.0
11.5
1.
486
.5 0.0
11.5
26.0
60.4 0.0
9.0
26.0
63.0 O N CD oo
° ° £ ZR
AT
ING
S B
Y M
E ar
ea
(km
2) 050
20 592
3766
2 050
2011
298
2627
5 039
0311
331
2741
8 026
727
926
42
60
J %ar
ea
O (O N O O CN T- CO 0.
012
.322
.065
.7 0.4
11.2
20.4
68.0 0.0
5.2
59.7
35.1
RA
TIN
GS
BY
RM
l ar
ea
(km
2) 053
51 728
3743
7 053
5795
742
85
85
162
48
7688
682
961
0 018
742
149
912
637
i su
itab
ility
ratin
g t- CN CO Tf T- CN CO Tj- r - (N CO r f r - CN CO r f
crop
rubb
_hi
rubb
_hi
rubb
_hi
rubb
_h
rub
bjo
rub
bjo
rubb
_lc
rubb
_lo
va
nijc
va
nijo
van
i_lc
va
nijo
ca
rdjc
ca
rdjo
ca
rdjo
ca
rdjo
O ^ ^ * ^ ^ ^ ^ ^.E>
Lü LU LU LU LU LU LU LU LU LU LU LU
LUCL>h-■> co Tf N r - Tj- m- ■>- oo o s i n co o o cm cdZ E T- Tf Tf oi T— Tj" uo oo Ö ir ih - C D ö c\i cd coO jro co cocNi m- m- ooQ ON LU
>“Cü co ^ 7 CO CO (D CD CD CO T - CD O CN CD m O CD t- CO
(D V O CD (O O O ) O ) CN CT) O T— CO f^- i n^ i= E ^ CO (N N ^ CO ^ CD CO CN O CN t- CNO - ^ T - T - C O T— CD CO T - N - N- CN T -2 ^ CN T - T -
£ca O O CT) CM O O t O M - O CT) i n (D O CD CD CT)
553
cas g
CN in cd m(J) N Tf O
(N in O r -O) N m o
O in N CDh- T- CN
O O CN CO CO CN N-
CN T- Tt O Tj- tT •»-
CNCN r - m ö)
N- N- Oin cd r f (O o in
CO m CN T- CN
su
ita
bil
ity
rati
ng T - (N CO Tf r - CN CO 1- CN (O ^ r - CN (O Tf
Q. E 'E JE E o o o o o o o o O O O O
oI I I I
D D D D U £1 D D J D □ D
1 1 1 1 JD JD JD JD _Q _Q _Q _Q □ 3 D D
E E E ECT3 CT3 CT3 CC3> > > >
1 1 1 1 TD TD TD "O C0 03 03 03 O O O O
4)
,E>
z : z z zLU LU LÜ LUo o o o
2 2 2 2 LU LU LU LUo o o o
2 2 2 2 LU LU LU UJo o o o
_J _J _J _J ^ ^ ^ ^
Q.
O 00 T t 00 o ) o ) h - T f cxD CN (D o m CN CD O OO CNO OO CO T - T - CD c o T f
i n T -T - CD CN - f-
CDr - O CO CO
co i nr - O (O T f
CO CO (M
o i n oo om CN CD
CD CD i n 00 CD CD ÖD CD
CD CN T f O CD CD CD CD
o CO ^ r - CO CO N N
o c o i n T f CO CO CD T - 8
r “ T f CN CO CD N"
CN
i n o T - CN cd ▼- m
CN
i n oo i n CN i n CN x f
CN
o o o
T - CN
N - O CD CD T - CN CO
N"
CN 00 CD T— CD CO CO N" CO CD CM CT) CT) CT) O CO N- CO N - CDo co m m
m co^ CD N co
T - CO coTT CD CN T f
Tj- co1- co i n T f
T - h -•»- CT) T - hL
•t— CO
o co m NCD CD tJ- CO
o CN i n co i n co cd co
T f co co oCO T - 00 00
' t N i f if ' - CT) CT) M"
r - tj- i n Tj-O CD CD r j- s
T - T - CD CO O CN
CN T -
cd cd m ooT - CD CO CO
m N T - mr - CD i n CN
CD h - h - N CD T— CD
CN
i n CD CN CNcd r -
m
T - CN CO N- T— CN CO r - CN CO ^ T - CN CO N- T - CN CO ^ -
cash
_lo
cash
_lo
ca
sh
joca
sh_l
o
chil_
loch
il_lo
ch
iljo
ch
iljo
citr
_lo
cit
rjo
cit
rjo
cit
rjo
coco
_h
ico
co_
hi
coco
_h
ico
co_
hi o o o o
I I I I o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o c
oc
njo
* ^ ^ ^ ^ * * X . ^ * i d X. X. X. X.CO CO CO co co co co co co co c o co c o co c o co co c o co co co
§ § § § § § § § § § § § 5 § § § §
o m m o i M- M- M" CT) CD O CT) O CD CD in CO CN co 00 COO O ) CO 00 O CD T - co
f - Is-T— CO CN CO ö r - T - CT)
T - CDö CO Ö CD
- - CD T -Ö
013
2011
094
1258 56
2318
1008
212
58 222
1839
1026
312
58
724
8116
4598
12 4325
7685
9123
67
CO
T - CN 00 CD T - 00 N N" CD 00 tJ- CD CO CD CD CN r - r - i n CO mö T - cg i r i r i i n n N
T - C£) •>-r r -r- r^.' i n
CD T -co m T - cd
T - T - CDCN N N CO
r - i n CNco
r — CO 00 CO CNI CO N T f
443
2235
8991
2456
m co cd coCD CD T— T f
i n T— cd co cd i n c o N
o oo oO r - CD
mCD
i n CN CN ^ O CN
CD CD i n CN T - CD CN
CN CD N CN T— CD
CO T f T— CN CN 00 CO
N-
T - CN CO ^ r - CN CO ^ T— CN CO N" T - CN CO N- T - CN CO TT
cash
_lo
cash
_lo
ca
sh
joc
as
hjo
ch
iljo
ch
iljo
ch
iljo
ch
iljo
cit
rjo
cit
rjo
cit
rjo
cit
rjo
coco
_hi
coco
_h
ico
co_
hi
coco
_h
i o o o o 1 i 1 1o o o o
o o u o o o o o o o o o
0| UOOO
MIL
MIL
MIL
MIL
MIL
MIL
MIL
MIL —1 _J —1 _J
^ ^ ^ ^ MIL
MIL
MIL
MIL
MIL
MIL
MIL
MIL
MIL
LUCL>-
ED.
EN
V.
7 %
are
a
16.7
50
.024
.8 7.6
0.5
0.0
91.5 O CD O O
1.2
30.7
10
8
50.5 12
30.7
47.
213
.3 1.2
0.6
21.5
69.
5
0 0
8 8
73.4
11
.8
8 8
9.2
26 0
54
.0 1.3
16.7
59.0
20.3 0.0
31.8
36.0
>/IU
R
AT
ING
S B
Y M
E%
area
ar
ea(k
m2)
5998
1800
089
14
2725 17
0 032
961
1447
4165
030
244
430
1107
338
7218
176
430
1107
316
999
4783 430 22
377
5025
038 0
3155
2642
842
60
3160
3321
9360
1945
4
467
6014
2125
172
97
611
457
1296
5
16.4
31.3
47.
9
4.3
0.6
0.0
95.1 CN in o CN
N" CD O CD CO 3.
5 19
4
8.3
68.
8
2.6
20 4
3
7.0
39.9
4.1
2.9
4.9
88.2 0.2
8.8
55.
935
.1 0.0
7.4
36.8
55
8 1.5
21.
94
7.2
29.4 1.5
19.3
31.4
MIN
GS
BY
Rr
area
(k
m2)
5896
1128
617
244
1544 220 11
342
35
1527
341
9 113
10
53
1269
698
729
93
2476
1
942
735
813
330
1438
0
1476
1040
1747
317
47 60
316
82
01
45
1263
7 026
76
1325
42
00
80
541
7882
1700
810
579
535
693
611
295
DC>, g> CN CO Tf T- CN CO TJ- T- CN CO N" CN CO N" T- CN CO Tf ^ CN CO N- T- CN CO Tf T- CN CO N- T- CN CO N- r - CN CO
5 '7503 »—
1
h2co
f_lo
h2co
f_lo
h2co
f_lo
h2co
f_lo o o o o
o o o oU U Ü u
ma
ng
jom
an
gjo
ma
ng
jom
an
gjo
oil
pjo
oil
pjo
oil
pjo
oil
pjo
pe
pp
jop
ep
pjo
pe
pp
jo
crop
o o o I I I c c c o o o
o o o o o o h2co
f_hi
h2co
f_hi
h2co
f_hi
h2co
f_hi
rcof
_hi
rcof
_hi
rcof
_hi
rcof
_hi
mai
z_hi
mai
z_hi
mai
z_hi
mai
z_hi -Q JZ JZ .c
I I I I _Q._9-_Q._Q.O 5 O O
o isC X. * ^ ^ ^ * ^ ^ ^4 ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ Ü ^ ^ ^ ^ ^,EoQ.
5 § § 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 § 5 § § § § § § § 5 § § 5 5 5
LU0-
S 5LU 14
.160
.816
.8
0 86 0 0 0 0 0 2 2.
017
.5
0.0
80.5 2.9
10.5
15
.4
69 4 m D o co
^ CO O O) 0.0
11.6
11.4
75.7 0.0
9 3
78 5
8
9
12.3 5.2
14.1
66.1 3.9
14 6
64
.2
13 4 0.0
18.7
59.7
TIN
GS
BY
ME
D
area
%
(km
2)
1996
8591
2367 27
8 0 413
843
278
2466
411
377
408
1485
2170
9803 63
012
5398
8713
16
016
4016
1710
694 0
1320
1109
412
58
1736 73
719
9593
40 553
2066
9063
1895
026
3584
31
U
RA
%ar
ea
16.9
56.3
23.
3
4 2
0 2
0.0
95.6 4.2
10.7
0.0
85.1 6.2
9 2
17 0
67
.5 9.0
10.5
62.3
18.3
6 9/
OZ
l 6 8 V
I 0.4
11.0
72.8
15.9
14 0
8.
5 12
2
65 2 CN ID CD CO
ID CD CO O) t— ID —
2.9
16.8
55.2
PIN
GS
BY
RM
ar
ea
(km
2)
2383
7957
329
0
587 254
1350
9
587
1513
412
021
877
1305
240
895
35
1269
1480
8793
2583 30
312
6016
9710
865 50
1554
1027
822
43
1975
1207
1727
9216 74
123
3383
1827
33 406
237
978
03
$T ' o) CN CO Tf T- CN CO N- T- CN CO N- r- CN CO N- i - CN CO ^ T- CN CO TT T- CN CO N- r- CN CO Tf T- cm ro
s i s03 k—
1
h2co
f_lo
h2co
f_lo
h2co
f_lo
h2
cofJ
o O O O O
o o o o o o u o
ma
ng
jom
an
gjo
ma
ng
jom
an
gjo
oil
pjo
oil
pjo
oil
pjo
oil
pjo
pe
pp
jop
ep
pjo
pe
pp
jo
crop
co
cn
joc
oc
njo
co
cn
jo
h2co
f_hi
h2co
f_hi
h2co
f_hi
h2co
f_hi
rcof
_hi
rcof
_hi
rcof
_hi
rcof
_hi
mai
z_hi
mai
z_hi
mai
z_hi
mai
z_hi
oil
pji
oilp
_hoi
lp_h
oilp
_h
8.E M
ILM
ILM
IL _i _i _i —i2 ^ ^ ^
_ J _ J _ J _ J _I _I _I _I5 5 5 5
_I _1 _1 _1 _J _J _J _J5 5 5 5 M
ILM
ILM
ILM
IL _i _i _i _i _i _i _i _i2 ^ ^ ^ M
ILM
ILM
IL
O
RA
TIN
GS
BY
RM
U
RA
TIN
GS
BY
ME
D.
EN
V.
TY
PE
R
AT
ING
S B
Y R
MU
R
AT
ING
S B
Y M
ED
. E
NV
T
YP
E%
are
a co
a
1.2
32.9
45.3
14.7 0.0
0.5
45.5
47.9 0.0
0.0
20.1
78.3 1.4
7.6
46.3
44.0 0.0
32.3
15
3
50.5 0.0
32.3
51
.7
13 3 1.2
30 6
36
.0
24.8 0.0
0.0
85.9
14.1 0.0
0.0
85.9
14.1
area
(km
2)
8914 43
011
858
1631
452
98
017
016
387
1725
7 0 072
4128
192
520
2753
1668
515
838 0
1161
855
0118
176 0
1161
818
628
4783 43
011
033
1296
589
14
0 018
02 296 0 0
1802 29
6
%ar
ea
47.9 2.3
21.6
38.1
38.0 0.0
0.5
35.4
64.0 0.0
0.0
19.7
80.2 4.5
7.4
41.7
46.3 0.3
23.7
7.
268
.8 0.3
23.7
36.0
39.9 1.7
19.0
31.4
47
.9 0.0
0.0
85.6
14.4
VV
l 9 98 0
0
0 0ar
ea(k
m2)
1724
4
828
7777
1373
613
669 0
185
1276
223
06
3 0 1171
112
888
8
1637
2667
1502
316
683
116
8540
2593
2476
1
116
8540
1297
414
380
614
68
5711
295
1724
4 0 017
95 303 0 0
1795
303
>, g) t— CN CO N - T - CN CO N- t— CN CO N" r - CN CO TT T - CN CO r t T - CN CO N- r - CN CO T f T - CN CO T t r - CN CO ^
5 75 iS1
pin
ejo
pine
_lo
pin
ejo
pin
ejo
rub
bjo
rub
bjo
rub
bjo
rub
bjo o o o o
t i l l c c= c cCD CD CD CD > > > > c
as
hjo
cash
_lo
cash
_lo
ca
sh
jo
crop
pepp
_lo
pota
_hi
pota
_hi
pota
_hi
pota
_hi
py
rejo
py
rejo
py
rejo
py
rejo
rice_
hiric
e_hi
rice_
hiric
e_hi £ r £ £
I I I I £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ E E E E ca
rd J
o
ca
rdjo
ca
rd J
o
ca
rdjo
O * * * ^ ^ * ^ * * * ^ x. 2 Z 2 Z 2 2 2 2
.£5 5 5 5 5 5 § § § § § § § § 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 2 2 2 S ^ ^ ^ ^
CO<D CD C\l G) T f m
h - n C\l CO NT— CN CD
° ° O T-
o o p -co CD
o o p- n - o o öS öS
Ul N N N N lO O CO
C\l CD
o o n - o oo T— öS
CD
O O CN CO O CD 00 O)
tT CD 00 CO O 00 O CD
T— CD ▼-
r ^ T - T— cd ö cg m o
P - CN
N CN CDO T - (O o
T— CD CN
p - co O ) m nCN in co m in
O P - CO CD CO P -
O O P*- CD t O (N Om o CN o
O 00 T f CO CO O O
o N- m cdCO CO T -
CD T - ^ N in CN CD CD
o CN in p - m c d ^ CN
m N" CN CJ) oCN co co r -
CO T f N" CD
P - CN CN T -
O CO CD O T - CN O)
m cd ooCN T * CD
CD CD CO CN CD T -
cd m coCN 00 CN
N- O) CD CD N-
03CD
N" CD in CO o CN m co O T - co P r - O (X> O CD CD O in cd m cd co CO CD O CO p t t m N-CD O CD CD
CN in T -O Ö CO CD
CO CD ° ° m Sr - CD T - CN
CN CDO CD CN N
’T- T - CDo o o co
CN CD T -CN CD P CO
r - in CNo m T - CN
CD CO
CD CO N N ’o m CN T - in co
03 rp p~. p- 03 p- CN(D CO 03 TT N OE i n co 03 03 co
ro co CN N CN
o N i n coCN CO CD
P - coN- 03in p - in in
N- P- O ^o cd o inO CN T - N T - T - CO CO
T- 03 in T- co co co cd inCN T— 03
§X- T- co03 CD 00co m inCN 00 CN
CD 03 O O 03 00 in 03 CO CO O CN
CN co CO
O T - o 03 in CN N- 03 T - CN co CN
T - CO N
m N cn ’- ( N O )co m CNCN CN P-
£ g5 5 ’« iS k—
T - CN CO T f T - CN CO TT
o
q !S'
O O O OI I I I
a> a> a> <u . £ . £ .E .E a a a a
£ r j: r I I I I
cd ca ca coo o o oQ . Q . Q . Q .
o o o o I I I I J 0 J) J)
>* >> >* CL CL CL CL
sz x sz sz I I I I
8 8 S 8C X X x
sz x sz sz : I I I
£2 £3 £3 X I X X £3 £3
2 3
° ° ° °t i l l I I I I I I I I
x x x x E E E E p p p p03 CT3 CO (T3H H D H
D U =J D > > > > 03 03 03 03o o o a
o o o oI I I I
x: jz -c jzCO CO C/) (/303 03 CD 03o o o o
_J _J _J _J ^ _J _J _J
s ^ s s 2 ^X X X X X X
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^X X X X
i 1 1 1X X X X X X X X
1— I— I— I— 2 2 Z 2
X X X X I— I— h- H Z 2 2 2
NG
S B
Y R
MU
R
ATI
NG
S B
Y M
ED
E
NV
TY
PE
R
ATI
NG
S B
Y R
MU
R
ATI
NG
S B
Y M
ED
. E
NV
TY
PE
030 )
03
TO J
03CD
t g15 -HS
1Q-
U
O
03CD
s ?TO I
t-
t g*1 ™ 03
0.0
32.2
33
4
14.1 0.0
0.0
84.9
14
1 0.0
32.2
20.3
47
.5 0.0
32 2
33 4
14
1 0.0
32.2
33.4
14 1 o o o o
O O O O O
o o o o o o o o 0.
00.
031
.247
.5 0.0
32.2
33
.4
14 1 o o
O CT>0
676
701
296 0 0
1781 29
6 067
642
599
7 067
670
129
6 067
670
129
6 O O O CD CD
8
O O O 00 CD
8
0 065
599
7 067
670
129
6 O CD 00
0.0
38.1
47.5
14.4 0.0
3.6
82.0
14 4 0 0
38.1
4.
0 57
.9 0.0
38.1
47.5
14 4 0.0
38.1
47
.5
14 4 o o o o
o o o oO O O O o o o o 0.
0 3.
6 38
5
57.9 0.0
38.1
47.5
14.4 O CD
O lO
079
999
630
3 0 7517
20 303 0
799 84
1215 0
799
996
303 0
799
996
303 0 0 0
2098 O O O CO
CD
8
0 75 808
1215 0
799
996
303 0
118
•«— CN CO tJ- x- CM CO N- T- CM CO Tt r - CN CO ^ r - CN CO ^ r - CN CO Tf T- CN CO r r x- CM CO tT CM CO M- CN
chil_
loch
iljo
chil_
loch
il_lo
citr
joci
trjo
citr
joci
trjo n r n r
I I I I o o o o o u o o o o o o o o o u
o o o o
I I I I o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
o o o oI I I I
c c c c o o o o o o o o o u o o h2
cof_
hih2
cof_
hih2
cof_
hih2
cof_
hi
h2co
f_lo
h2co
Jlo
h2co
f_lo
h2co
f_lo
rcof
_hi
rcof
_hi
rcof
_hi
rcof
_hi
rco
jlorc
of_l
orc
of_l
orc
ojo
mai
z_hi
mai
z_hi
Z Z Z Z < < < < ^ ^ ^ ^
2 2 2 2 < < < < 2 ^ ^ ^
2 2 2 2 < < < < 2 2 2 2
2 2 2 Z < < < < 2 2 2 2
2 2 2 2 < < < < ^ ^ 2 ^
2 2 2 2 < < < < ^ S ^ 2
2 2 2 2 < < < < S ^ 2 S
2 2 2 2 < < < < 2 2 2 2
2 2 2 2 < < < < ^ ^ ^ 2 M
AN
MA
N
0.7
20.1
44
6
33.1 9 3
16 9
51
.6
20 6 9.6
9.3
10 4
68
6 0.9
22.6
41
.6
34 7 0 9
22 6
4
16
34 7 4.3
0 0
0.0
95.7 4.3
17.9
0
077
.9 0.0
20 8
11
1 64
4 0 2
25.5
42
2
30 5 0.8
15 1
159
4524
1003
074
41
2098
3812
1161
746
27
2164
2093
2337
1543
7
213
5078
9359
7821 21
350
7893
5978
21 960 7 0
2154
3
960
4020 0
1753
0 046
8324
9514
499 52
5746
9495
6861 17
034
01
5.4
16 3
35
.9
42 4 9.4
19 8
38
4
32.4 7.3
12.7 9.4
70.6 2 2
20 8
31
.9
45 0 5.4
17 6
31
.9
45 0 3.1
0 1
0.0
96 9 3.1
13 6
0.
0 83
.3 11
20 6
10
.6
67.7 5.5
21.5
34
7
38 2 4.3
14 4
1216
3670
8073
9551
2109
4455
8653
7293
1632
2863
2120
1589
5
506
4688
7183
1013
3
1220
3967
7190
1013
3
694 14 0
2180
2
694
3071
018
745
243
4643
2381
1524
3
1249
4835
7817
8609 96
432
41
r - ( \ fO Tf T- cm c o r - CM CO r - CM CO ^ T- CN CO Tt T- CM CO N- T- CN CO ^ T- CN CO M- f rg ro CN
chilj
och
iljo
chilj
och
iljo
citr
joci
trjo
citr
joci
trjo
coco
_hi
coco
_hi
coco
_hi
coco
_hi
coco
joco
cojo
coco
joco
cojo O O O O
I I I I c c c c o o o o o o o o o o o o h2
cof_
hih2
cof_
hih2
cof_
hih2
cof_
hi
h2co
f_lo
h2co
f_lo
h2co
f_lo
h2co
f_lo
rcof
_hi
rcof
_hi
rcof
_hi
rcof
_hi
rco
jlorc
ojlo
rco
jlorc
ojlo
-C
11
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
Z 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Z Z 2 Z 2 2 2 Z Z 2 2 Z Z 2 2 2 2 Z Z z z
RA
TIN
GS
BY R
MU
R
ATI
NG
S BY
MED
. EN
V. T
YPE
R
ATI
NG
S BY
RM
U
RA
TIN
GS
BY M
ED. E
NV
.
UJQ.
i iQ
o o o ö
03
0.0
0.0
85.9
14.1
10.0
22.2
33.3
34.5
11
fr 9fr Z
ZZ
0 0 0.0
32.2
33.4
14.1 0.0
32.2
33.4
14.1 0.0
0.0
32.2
47.5 o o o o
o ö ö ö o 0.0
21.1
24
.1
34 5 0.0
32.2
20.3
47
.5
RA
TIN
GS
BY M
E ar
ea
(km
2) o coCO00
0 018
02 296
210
466
698
724 0
676
974 23 0
676
701
296 0
676
701
296 0 0
676
997 O O O CO
CD
s
044
350
672
4 067
642
599
7
S B
Y RM
Ure
a %
area
n2)
103
4.9
377
89.5
0 0.
00
0.0
>95
85.6
303
14.4
I93
9.2
362
31.6
>60
12.4
383
46.9
35
1.7
320
39.1
172
55.9
71
3.4
0 0.
0 >9
9 38
.139
6 47
.530
3 14
4
0 0.
038
3 42
.131
2 43
.530
3 14
.4
0 0.
00
0.0
383
42.1
>15
57.9 o o o o
d d ö o
o o o CO05
0 0.
0>4
2 11
.537
3 41
.638
3 46
.9
0 0.
0>9
9 38
.184
4.
0>1
5 57
.9
PsCN
>r CO ■St T- CN CO st T— CN CO Tf r- (N (O Xf r- (N CO xf T- CN (O xf T- OJ CO St r- CN CO ^ CN (O xf T- (N CO xr
5 TS03 fc-
1
man
gjo
man
g_lo
man
g_lo
man
g_lo
oilp
jooi
lpjo
oilp
jooi
lpjo
pepp
jope
ppjo
pepp
joPe
PP
j°
pine
jopi
nejo
pine
jopi
nejo
pyre
jopy
rejo
pyre
jopy
rejo
crop
mai
z_hi
mai
z_hi
oilp
_hi
oilp
_hi
oilp
_hi
oilp
_hi
pota
jii
pota
_hi
pota
jii
pota
_hi
rice_
hiri
ceji
iric
e_hi
rice
jii
rubb
_hi
rubb
_hi
rubb
jii
rubb
_hi
prov
ince
MAN
MAN
Z Z Z Z< < < < 2 2 2 2
2 Z 2 2 < < < < 2 2 2 2
2 2 2 2 < < < < 2 2 2 2
2 2 2 Z< < < < 2 2 2 2
2 2 2 2 < < < < 2 2 2 2
Z 2 Z 2< < < < 2 2 2 2
2 2 2 2 < < < < 2 2 2 2
2 2 2 2< < < < 2 2 2 2
2 2 2 2 < < < < 2 2 2 2
LUQ_
: ? LU 03
5.6
75.4 1.4
9.8
63 4
20
.6
13.3 7.2
16.7
56.2 0.2
25.5
45.2
25.0 0.0
21.1
43.7
34.7 0.9
19.9
54.4
23.2 0.0
0.7
34 9
64
.4 0.0
0.0
26.0
74.0 0.8
17.7
26.9
51.1 0.0
24 9
7.
0 64
4
TIN
GS
BY M
ED.
area
%
(km
2)
1260
1697
3
310
2206
1428
146
27
2988
1610
3748
1265
0 5257
5110
183
5621
047
5798
3178
21 213
4477
1225
052
14 914
878
6114
492 0 7
5851
1665
2
170
3993
6052
1149
3 056
0015
7814
499
<Li r
TO<DTO
1.9
79.4 6.7
5.2
55.7
32.4 O CD O s t
CO OO N T - s ~ s - CO
5.5
18 2
38
.5
37.8 0.9
19.6
34.4
45.0 2.6
19.2
35.9
42.4 0.0
1.1 32.7
66.1
9 6Z fr 03 0 0 0 0 4.
716
.821
.756
.8 0.5
21.6
10
2
67.7
riN
GS
BY R
M
area
(k
m2)
435
1787
0
1505
1179
1252
772
99
2925
1927
3827
1383
1
1245
4086
8676
8503 20
944
2277
4610
133
580
4313
8079
9538 9
247
7371
1488
3 0 745
8717
916
1069
3784
4882
1277
5
121
4851
2295
1524
3
2
& co T - CM CO s t r - CNM O T f r - (N (O x r T - (N CO xj- r - (N CO S t ^— (M CO x f T - CN CO T f T - CN CO N - r - CN CO xj-
= = to EE
1
PeP
Pjo
pepp
jope
ppjo
pepp
jo
pine
jopi
nejo
pine
jopi
nejo
pyre
jopy
rejo
pyre
jopy
rejo
crop
mai
z_hi
mai
z_hi
man
g_lo
man
g_lo
man
g_lo
man
gjo
oilp
_hi
oilp
jiioi
lp_h
ioi
lpjii
oilp
jooi
lpjo
oilp
jooi
lpjo
pota
jii
pota
_hi
pota
_hi
pota
_hi
rice_
hiric
e_h
rice_
hiric
e_hi
rubb
_hru
bb_h
rubb
jiru
bbji
s X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X I— l— I— h— 2 2 2 2
X I X X X X X X.E z z z z z z 2 2 2 2 z z z z Z 2 2 2 2 2 Z 2 2 Z 2 2 Z 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
RATI
NGS BY
RMU
RA
TING
S BY
MED. ENV. TYP
E RA
TING
S BY
RMU
RA
TING
S BY
MED. ENV. TYP
E
03<D03£
O CN Tf T-ö cn ro tj-'co CO T-
O (M ^ T-ö c\i co Ttco co T-
O CN N- 03o in co o00 T-
o o m 03 O O co o
O N 03 CN 00 CN O
r— (D y—
CO T- N 03 O CO N O (N in r-
CN co T- mCN 03 Tt 03
T- T- mC0 03 Tf Tfö in c\i toCN m T—
CN T— Tf Tj- oCN Tf CN CD ÖCN m T-
ro 1 O CD T- CD N O O) CD N CNO CD r- CD N O 03CD N CN
o o N- h- CO COcd co tj-
cn m o o r- co T-
CO CN O CD CO CN in N* CN in oCN m T-
CO CO N No m m T-CN CO CO N T- T- m
CO O CO N" CO 03 CO N^ o inCN in T-
o
03CD o T- m N- o co N \rco t T-
o t- in N-O CD N ^
CO N" —
o 03 co mO N CN 0300
o o in mO O Ö 03 03
o CN co mT- o 03 03 r- CN in
CN co co in co co in 03 CN m
N- CO O CO O 00 CN 03 r- T- CN Tf
CO O CO 00N m (N CN in r-co co co coO T- CN Tt r- (N in r-
t f 03 CO CO 03 03 Om 03 co
03 CO CO 03 03 o O N- 03 CNCO CO r-M 03 03
CM 00 roco co o cn -<3- o cd in in in N coCM CO
COcn coCT) n-
CM CO COco o in cm Is- M- O M- cm cn ■<-
N S CO CO •*— CT) CM O O O M-T- cm in T-
£ 2 5 TS03 V_
T- CN CO N- T- CN CO N-
o o o o I I I I_Q -O _Q _Q -Q -Q JD _Q O 3 D 13
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |E E E ECO CT3 03 03> > > >
o o o ot i l l■D TD -O TDi— *— »— *—03 03 03 03(J O O O
O O O OI I I I £ £ £ £ CO CO CO 10 03 03 03 03 O O O O
° O o oI I I I“ — — mo u o o
O O O O G G G G
S1 SZ _cI I I I o o o o o o o o o o o o (J o o o
0 o o o01 o1 o1 o1 o o o o o o o o o o o o
o o o oI I I I c c c c o o o o o o o o o o u o
ij
03<D
03<D
™ I
£ i15 co03 *-
2:2 2 : 2 2 2 2 2< < < < < < < <^ ^ 2
o 00 T- inO 03 CX) O CN CO CO
o cd m NO N N CN CO CO
m m inCD 00
cn00CD
O CD CN ■*— N- N- CNT- Tj- 00(D CO N
O N- CO CN O N Tf CO CN CO CO
N- o m or- (N r- in
CN CO xf
o m <nCD M
oCD00
C3 T- s CO r- CD 03 CO CO 03 O T— N- h- O
t- C N C O N - T- CN CO TT
cd cd cd cd er er er er er er er er er er er er Cd Cd Cd Cd er er er er er er er er erz z z z 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ~Z.-Z.-Z.-Z. 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
cm T- in 0 O O CN O 0 co m co O N- CN O O CD in N O CD 03 O O CD 03 O MÖ TJ- IT)— CO CM 0 0 cn in m cn 0 0 in T-T- in co 0 T- 0 mCD CN Ö CN 03 03 O CN 03 IO CN CD O CN 03 in CN CD CN
T- T- m cd in cd 00 0 O O N- CD CN O O CN T- CO N- N- CO O N- CO CD CN CN O O N- 't- 03 N CD CN O N" O M M D m O N- O M N CD m inCDCO 03 Tj- N- CO CD in N-00 CD CD CN O CN N- 00 03 N- rf CN in CD CD N- N- CN O CD CD CD M CD CD CD CD M CD CNCOCN
CN N N Tf O O CD Tj- O CD CN CN O CD CN CN O CD CD 00 O CD r- CO O CD T- CO 03O N* CO T— T- m CO O O 00 T—CD CO 0 cb in co in co 0 co co 00CD CN 0 cn in T-T- 00 O (N N O CN M O CN M O CN M 03
N CO Tj-in CD N TJ- O O CD N- 03 N’ O CO 03 CO CO N- O O CN g 03 O N- CO CO N 03 N O N- CN Tf N t CN O N- CN N- N (N 03m m 0 co co 00 m 0M 00 CD T- co T- N- 03 CN CN CN CN CD N CD 03 03 CO O CD 03 O CD CO CD 03 O CD 00 inCNCN
CN CO r- CN CO r- CN CO Tf T- CN CO N- T- CN CO Tf T- CN CO N- T- CN CO
rubbjo
rubbjo
rubbjo
rubb_lo 0 0 0 0
1 1 1 1 c c c cCO CD CO CT3> > > > cardjo
card Jo
cardjo
cardjo
cashjo
cashjo
cashjo
cashjo
chiljo
chiljo
chiljo
chiljo
citrjo
citrjo
citrjo
citrjo
coco_hi
coco_hi
coco_hi
coco_hi 0 0 0 0
1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cocnjo
cocn_lo
cocnjo
cocnjo
h2cof_hi
X X X X 1- H H 1- 2 Z Z Z
X X X X h h h H Z Z 2 2
>>->->- X X X Xco co co co>>->->- X X X X co co co co
> > >- > X X X Xco co co co>->>>- X X X Xco co co co
>>>->- X X X X co co co co>->->->- X X X X co co co co
>->->->- X X X Xco co co co SHY
ING
SB
YR
MU
R
ATI
NG
S B
Y M
ED.
ENV.
TY
PE
R
ATI
NG
S B
Y R
MU
R
ATI
NG
S B
Y M
ED.
ENV.
TY
PE
CDCD
I f
03CD03
£
03CD
«1
03CD
«I2
03 w-
Q .
O
0S
6
0 0 0 9 5.
011
.8 0.0
83.1 0.0
23.4
14
6
59.0 0.0
30.3
58.3
10
.9 0.0
18 2
2.
9 73
.9 0.0
0.0
88.7
10
9
18 5
3.
0 20
.7
52.9
0.0
31.2
59
0
9.8
2.2
24.1
52
.4
16 4 0.0
26.1
60.1
483 0
9132 48
311
380
7994
022
5214
0756
72
029
1856
0610
46
017
5427
671
05
0 085
2410
46
1777
284
1992
5082
030
0356
73 939
208
2315
5038
1574
025
0557
80
0 96 0 9 0 0 0.
04.
820
.075
.2 0.0
28.3
22.7
49.0 0.0
34.7
55.5 9.7
0.0
13.7
10
.675
.7 o o in ino o O CO
co 15.1
13.7
24.8
46
.4 0.0
35.2
52.8
11
9
10.4
22.0
52.8
14.8
0.0
35.5
55.3
048
391
32
045
819
227
235 0
2722
2181
471
2 033
3953
39 937 0
1322
1019
7274
0 087
03 912
1448
1319
2384
446
4 033
8950
7911
47
1002
2112
5078
1423
034
1053
18
CN CO T f r- ( N CO ^ r- CN CO Tj- T- CNJ CO t T r- (N CO ^ T- ON CO Tj T- CM CO Tf T - cNj c o CN CO t T t" CM CO
h2co
f_h
ih2
cof_
hi
h2co
f_h
i
h2co
f_lo
h2co
f_lo
h2co
f_lo
h2co
f_lo
rcof
_hi
rcof
_hi
rcof
_hi
rcof
_hi
rco
fjo
rco
fjo
rcof
_lo
rcof
_lo
mai
z_h
im
aiz_
hi
mai
z_h
im
aiz_
hi
ma
ng
jom
an
gjo
ma
ng
jom
an
gjo
oilp
_hi
oilp
_hi
oilp
_hi
oilp
_hi
oilp
joo
ilpjo
oilp
joo
ilpjo
pe
pp
jop
ep
pjo
pe
pp
jop
ep
pjo
pin
ejo
pin
ejo
pin
ejo
NIR
NIR
NIR X X X X
X z z zX X X Xz z z z
X X X Xz z z z
X X X Xz z z z
X X X Xz z z z
X X X Xz z z z
X X X Xz z z z
X X X Xz z z z N
IRN
IRN
IR
0.8
0.3
86.2
12.7
13
8
2.5
71.0 0 0
0.2
25 9
65
.4 0.0
1.6
57.2
38.0 0.0
2.4
13 8
83
.8 0.0
0.0
72.2
25.0 2 1
0.6
11.1
78
.0 0.0
2.6
31.4
63
4 0.0
2.6
29 9
65
0 0.0
13.1
52
8
209 77
2208
9
3265
3528 63
918
208 0 51
6640
1676
8 040
814
657
9748
062
835
3521
477 0 0
1852
464
06 529
145
2838
1999
7 067
480
4216
250 0
674
7660
1665
7 033
5713
526
3.4
0.0
86.7 9 5
14 8
0.
0 75
.7 0 0
0.3
33.5
66
.2 0.0
1.8
52.4
45.9 0.0
2.9
13 0
84
.1 0.0
0.0
68.6
31.4 0.0
2.1
0.6
97.4 O CD CD CO
Ö C\l CO CO CNJ (D
0.0
2.6
27.1
70.3 0.0
9.2
55 8
867 0
2222
4
2444
3796
019
400 0
7285
9916
969 0
451
1342
911
760 0
744
3336
215
60
0 017
596
8044
052
914
524
966 0
674
7333
1763
3 067
469
4218
024 0
2360
1430
2
CNJ CO r f r - ( N CO TT t- CsJ CO Tj- t- CN CO Tt CNJ CO TT T - CM CO ^ r - CM CO NT T- CNJ CO Tt T- CN CO Tt r - CNI CO
h2co
f_hi
h2co
f_hi
h2co
f_hi
h2co
f_lo
h2co
f_lo
h2co
f_lo
h2co
f_lo
rcof
_hi
rcof
_hi
rcof
_hi
rcof
_hi
rco
fjo
rco
fjo
rco
fjo
rco
fjo
mai
z_hi
mai
z_hi
mai
z_hi
mai
z_hi
ma
ng
jom
an
gjo
ma
ng
jom
an
gjo
oilp
_hi
oilp
_hi
oil
pji
ioi
lp_h
i
oilp
joo
ilpjo
oilp
joo
ilpjo
pe
pp
jop
ep
pjo
pe
pp
jop
ep
pjo
pin
ejo
pin
ejo
pin
ejo
>- >- > X X X CO C/5 CO
> > - > - > X X X XCO CO CO CO
> > - > - > - X X X Xco co co co
X X X Xco co co co
> -> - > -> - X X X X CO CO CO CO
> - > > > - X X X X CO CO CO CO
> - > - > -> - X X X XCO CO CO CO
> -> -> -> - X X X XCO CO CO CO
> > - > > - X X X X co co co co
>- >- > X X XCO CO CO
NG
S B
Y R
MU
R
AT
ING
S B
Y M
ED
. E
NV
. T
YP
E
RA
TIN
GS
BY
RM
U
RA
TIN
GS
BY
ME
D
EN
V.
TYP
E
03<DTO
SS
03 o o m o d o o m o c m c o m - 00 00 03 O 00 CO CN 03 c o r o c O M - o c o c O t-O O O Ö 03
N" inCD O 00 T- o CO CO CM
CM N CM CM IDT - T f CO 03
cn T - mr - 03 N o
cn m r - CMCDCOCD O O c n T fCM CM CM
° ^ s
« 1
CD 00 CN 0300 CO co in
in m cn h - co co CNJ co
O T f 03 N CO 03 CO CN CNJ O CN CN in
in T f 03 CN N co CO N T - CO CO CO
cn T - m
cn co co coN t OT— co m o
cn m T-
N- cn m tt NT m CD N (N co tt m
▼- m t-
O CN CNin 03
co03 CN T}- N- m T- co in co
CO
COCD
CN03
o o co r^O CO 00 00
^ Nj-
O O co CNd d n c\i
CN h -
O ^ co 03o r f ' 03 m
CN CN N-
co o in nCN CO T f 03
co in
O CN 03 00 O N O CN^ ^ CN TT O ^ CO in
cn m t— cn
O N fNo in 03 m
00T - CO
CO CO03 m
are
a
(km
2)
88
7 0
28
8
46
40
46
87 0 0
26
69
69
46 0
23
43
28
61
44
11
25
4
28
14
18
35
47
12
26
8
31
74
52
36
93
7
10
62
20
40
50
90
14
23 0
26
4
14
05
4
79
1 0
77
2
13
54
6
79
1
21
5
20
71
12
02
1
80
2
cro
p
su
ita
bil
ity
rati
ng T - CN CO N- •*- CN CO N- ^ CN CO N- CN CO Tt ▼" CN CO Tf T- CN CO T f CN CO Tf ^ CN CO T f t— CN CO tT
pin
e_
lc
po
ta_
h
po
ta_
h
po
ta_
h
po
ta_
h
py
rejc
py
rejc
py
re_
lc
py
re_
lc
ric
e_
hi
ric
e_
hi
ric
e_
hi
ric
e_
hi
rub
b_
hi
rub
b_
hi
rub
b_
hi
rub
b_
hi
rub
bjo
rub
b_
lo
rub
b_
lo
rub
bjo o o o o
t i l l c c c cTO TO TO TO > > > > c
ard
jo
ca
rdjo
ca
rdjo
ca
rdjo
ca
sh
jo
ca
sh
jo
ca
sh
jo
ca
sh
jo O O ° oI I I I “ — m “
pro
vin
ce
NIR
NIR
NIR
NIR
NIR IT cn CC DC
z z z z NIR
NIR
NIR
NIR IX DC CC DC
NIR
NIR
NIR
NIR DC DC DC DC
z z z zcn co co co z z z zLU LU LU LU
CO CO CO 00z z z zLU LU LU UJ
CD CD CO COz z z zLU LU UJ LU
0303
£
O CO T- CO O CN CN CO
T- cn in
O N" N" T—O T - co h -
m co
O N- T - CN o T- in m
T- CNJ m
O O T - T to co o m
CN CO
o co in oO CO CN CO
in co
O CO 03 o o cn 03 m
CN CO
O CO CO T- O CO TT cn
co m
O O CN T -O O 03 CN
co m
o o m coO -r- CO CO
co in
CO fTT" CO O CO N Tf 03 CO 03 CD Nto c o cn co m
co co in Tt
O 03 CN CO CO N CNco tj- in
N- 03
o r f in o cn co m03 T f t— CN CO N"
O •»— O 00 CO CO CO in T- m co
O CO 03 00o in Tj-CO ^ N
CO 03
N- O C-n io mCO CO CO
r - co
co m nCO 03 co
o o co r ~ N- co co * -N- CO
o (N T f N CN CO CN T - 03 N
co co
03CD
£
omCO
o o co mO CO T t CN
T - co m
O CO CN CNO h - T - ^r-
m N-
O Nf CO oO h - O CN
N" m
o co in cn
O CO N CO CN CO
O 00 CO 03o co n m
N- Tf
O CO r - CO O CN N O
CN h -
O CO CO o O -r- T - N
T - co in
O O 03 o o ^ T- r -
N" in
o m n co o o r^-
co co
to ^ oo o T - m T f cd to cn co mTO t 03 co 00 N-U 00 CO 00 CO
o co m 03 T f CN CO 03 m^ co o
O 00 CO 03 CN Tj- CO CO O 03T - co
o in in oN f CO CON T - N r - CN r -
O t T CN T f N ^ CN CO 03 o
CO 00
O CN CO T tN- N- mCO N N
co co
O 03 CO N - co m03 N N- CO
O h - 03 co N CO CN r- (D O
CO QO
0?
5 ' raTO k-
1
CN CO Tj- ^ CN CO Tj- ’» - C N C O tJ- CN CO T f
0
1
sz .c x: x:I I I I
ro ro oj roo o o oCL Q . Q . Q .
o o o o
d)1 0)1 (U1l— k_ k_ l_ > >> >> > Q- CL Q . CL
sz sz jz sz I I I I
CD CD CD (D O O O O
'k_ k_ i_
£ £ £ £I I I I
-Q -O -Q JD -Q JO n JOE S E E
.9 .Q . 2 . 2 ° ° ° j9 .9 _o .o .o
E E E S > > > > S S S S
o o o oI I I I
£ £ £ £ < /)< / )< / )< / ) TO TO TO TO U CJ O O
O O o ot i l l “ ” “ “
€ 6 - 8 $
1 >XCO
> - > - > > X X X X00 CO CO CO
> - > - > > - X X X XCO CO CO CO
> > - > - > X X X XCO CO CO CO
> - >■ > > X X X XCO CO CO CO
> - > - > -X X XCO CO CO
>- >X X
co co co co
0 0 0 0 Z Z Z Z LU UJ UJ LU
>-X
>-X
0 0 0 0z z z zLU UJ LU 111
0 0 0 0z z z zLU LU LU LU
LUCL
ME
D.
EN
V. T
% a
rea
4.0
15
.9
76
.0 4.1
0.2
15.1
39
.24
5.2 CN TT CD in
o cn t- co(N ^ CD m o CD T- CO 3
.2 0.0 0.0
96
.8 c n co o in co in o T-
T- co
0.0
15
.44
3.5
4
0.8 0.4
13
.97
5.7
4.1
0.0
2.9
6.1
88
.6 0.5
1.8
TIN
GS
BY
a
rea
(k
m2
)
60
22
40
81
14
85
61
4 25
22
76
59
30
68
27 30
29
28
10
81
61
28
4 302
92
81
08
16
12
84
48
0 0 01
46
29
48
02
30
9 01
23
20 0
2331
65
70
61
57 55
21
03
11
43
46
14 0
43
79
29
13
38
3 70
27
9
RM
U
RA
%a
rea
5.0
17
.37
2.5 5.2 1.2
13
.83
9.4
45
.6 1.2
18
.970
.1 9.7 2.5
17
.770
.1 9.7 o CD co cn
d cm ö to cn
0.0
2.8
15
.68
1.6 1.7
13
.44
3.4
41
.5 5.3
15
.67
3.6
5
.6
0.5
2.7
9.7
8
7.0
9 >
S
O
TIN
GS
BY
a
rea
(k
m2
)
75
52
61
31
09
50
791
17
82
07
85
95
86
89
5
18
328
611
05
98
14
67
37
326
71
10
59
81
46
7 04
33 42
14
63
4 04
27
23
57
12
32
5
26
22
02
46
55
16
27
2
79
923
51
11
11
58
44 79
41
51
46
71
31
48 70
70
2
£
2? g 1 T- (N CO ^ T- c\j or T- CNJ CO Tj- T- cm co t— CN CO Tf ■<— cm co T- CM CO 'p- CN CO r f ■<- CM CO T CN
5 '■«03 i-
1
h2
co
fJo
h2
co
fJo
h2
co
fJo
h2
co
fJo o o o o
o o o o o o o ocr
op
cit
rjo
cit
rjo
cit
rjo
cit
rjo
co
co_
hi
coco
_h
ic
oco
_h
ico
coJV
i
co
co
joc
oc
ojo
co
co
joc
oc
ojo
o o o oI I I I c c c c
o o o o o o o o o o o o h
2co
f_h
ih
2co
f_h
ih
2co
f_h
ih
2co
f_h
i
rco
f_h
rco
f_h
rco
f_h
rco
f_h
ma
iz_
hm
aiz
_h
ma
iz_
hm
aiz
_h
ma
ng
jcm
an
gjc
pro
vin
ce
CO CO CO CO -Z.-Z.-Z.-Z. LU LU LU LU
CO CO CO CDz z z zUJ LU LU LU
CO CO CO CQz z z zLU LU LU LU
CO CO CO COz z z zLU LU UJ LU
CO CO CO COz z z zLU LU LU LU
CO CO CD CO Z Z Z Z UJ LU LU LU
CD CO CD CO Z Z Z Z LU LU UJ LU
CO CO CQ COz z z zLU LU LU LU
CO CO CO COz z z zLU LU LU LU E
NB
EN
B
LUCL
J?LU
0.0
2.4
42
.54
9.6
0 66
0 0
SO
9 0
CD CD xf CD O r - CO O
O)
O O Tf CD O T- CO O
03
3.3
6.5 1.0
89
.3 3.3
29.1 0.0
66
.6 O O CO h" O r - CO If)
cn0
.0 1.0
30
.06
2.5 o cn c d
o T- cn mCD
o o o o
QLU2
TIN
GS
BY
a
rea
(k
m2
) 02
83
50
37
58
78 68 540
11
71
7 012
29
94
10
72
3 012
29
94
10
72
3
38
67
64
120
10
56
9
38
63
44
5 07
88
8 012
23
86
1133
1 012
23
55
57
39
4 02
29
28
911
321 o o
J R
A%
are
a
0.0
12
8
34
.5
52
.7
0 66
0 0 S
O
9 0
o o m m o <<- T-
(7>
0.0 1.0
7.5
91
.5
11
.8
2.8 0.0
85
.4
11
.81
7.9
0.7
69
.7 O O 00 CNo T- T-
T- CO
0.0
2
2 2
3.7
74
.1 0.0 1.9
4.0
94.1 o o
O T-
riN
GS
BY
RM
l a
rea
(k
m2
) 01
51
740
81
624
1 68 540
11
71
7 012
28
86
1083
1 012
28
86
108
31
13
92
33
7 01
01
10
13
92
21
19 81
82
47 0
122
13
92
10
32
5 02
58
28
08
87
73 0
22
94
72
11
13
8 01
19
s. 2 r o> t- C\j CO TJ- i - cm n ' f T- (M Cl Tf T- CN CO Tf i - CM CO t— CM CO M* t— CM CO T- CN CO Tf T- CN CO ^ T- CN
5 '•a
1
h2
co
fJo
h2
co
fJo
h2
co
fJo
h2
cof_
lo
rco
fjo
rco
fjo
rco
fjo
rco
fjo
ma
ng
jom
an
gjo
cro
p
cit
rjo
cit
rjo
cit
rjo
cit
rjo
coco
_h
ico
co_
hi
coco
_h
ico
co_
hi 0 O O O
0 1 o 1 o ' o ' o o o o o o o o o o o o c
oc
njo
co
cn
joco
cn_
loc
oc
njo
h2
cof_
hi
h2
cof_
hi
h2
cof_
hi
h2
cof_
hi
rco
f_h
rco
f_h
rco
f_h
rco
f_h
ma
iz_
hm
aiz
_h
ma
iz_
hm
aiz
_h
O.E>
CD CD CD CDz z z zLU LU LU LU
CD CD CD CD Z Z Z Z LU LU LU LU
CD CD CD CDz z z zLU LU LU LU
CD CD CD CD Z Z Z Z LU LU LU LU
CD CD CD CD Z Z Z Z LU LU LU LU
CD CD CD CD Z Z Z Z LU LU LU LU
CD CD CD CD Z Z Z Z LU LU LU LU
CD CD CD CD Z Z Z Z LU LU LU LU
CD CD CD CD z z z zLU UJ LU LU E
NG
EN
G
RA
TIN
GS
BY
RM
U
RA
TIN
GS
BY
ME
D
EN
V T
YP
E
RA
TIN
GS
BY
RM
U
RA
TIN
GS
BY
MED
. EN
V. T
YP
E:D
. EN
V. T
%
are
a
89.7 4.1
4.8
12.5
40.6
41.7 2.6
18 9
73
.2
5 1
0.2
18.9
72.0 8.5
0.2
16.0
79.5 4.0
0.0
0.0
58.9
40.8 0.0
0.0
38.9
61.1 0 2
9.0
47.3
37.3 0.0
15.4
43.5
40
.8 0.0
19 9
75
.7
4 1
co 2? p CD ro 2 w 1-
1355
261
4
723
1888
6140
6307 38
928
4911
056
764 30
2858
1088
612
84 3024
1912
009
600 0 0
8901
6157 0 0
5876
9233 30
1365
7141
5637 0
2331
6570
6157 0
3010
1143
461
4
CO0)CO 89
.7 5.2
5.4
11.5 0.0
83.1 2.5
19.5
72.0 6.0
2.5
17.2
70.6 9.7
2.1
13.9
78.7 5.3
0.0
0.0
58.8
41.2 0.0
0.0
38.9
61.1 1.9
11.2
49.4
37.5 0.0
15.1
43.4
41.5 0.0
20.8
73.6 5.6
TIN
GS
BY
Rr
area
(k
m2)
1354
679
1
816
1737 0
1255
6
382
2952
1087
490
1
373
2601
1066
814
67 324
2103
1188
879
4 0 088
7962
30 0 058
7192
38 292
1692
7461
5664 0
2286
6551
6272 0
3150
1111
584
4
RA
suita
bilit
yra
ting CO ^ T - ( \J CO T t r - CNJ CO T f t - CM CO T f t— c n n r - CN CO T t T - <n n T t T - c n n T f T - c n m n - r - ( M n ■ 'f
crop
ma
ng
jom
ang_
lo
oilp
_hi
oilp
_hi
oilp
_hi
oilp
_hi
oilp
joo
ilpjo
oilp
joo
ilpjo
pe
pp
jop
ep
pjo
pe
pp
jop
ep
pjo
pin
ejo
pin
ejo
pin
ejo
pin
ejo
po
tajii
po
taji
pota
_hpo
ta_h
i
pyre
Jo
pyre
_lc
pyr
ejo
p
yre
jo
rice_
hiric
e_hi
rice_
hiric
e_hi
rub
bjii
rub
bjii
rubb
_hi
rub
bjii
rub
bjo
rub
bjo
rub
bjo
rub
bjo
8.E E
NB
EN
B CD CQ CO COz z z zLU LU LU LU
CO CO CO CQz z z zLU LU LU LU
CO CO CO CQz z z zLU LU LU LU
CO CQ CQ COz z z zLU LU LU LU
CO CQ CQ CQz z z zLU LU UJ LU
CO CQ CQ COz z z zLU LU LU LU
CO CO CQ CQz z z zLU LU LU LU
CQ CQ CQ CQz z z zLU LU LU LU
CQ CQ CO COz z z zLU LU LU LU
LUCL
> 5LU 03
CN T- cd m o o o o o o O O TT CD ° N- T- f^ O T- 03 CO o ▼- co o 03 T- CN O O CO P- o o o mcn cn co m o o o a
o T- CO 03 O T- CO O 03 Ö CN CO COrr m
O Tf' CO T— CO CD o N- in xj- o r- 00 03co m CD y - C l in03 o r- O CN CO CDQuu
CD r~- rj- CD CO O-
cd mo r - o CN N O (N ^ N
O CN tT CO CN 03 CNO CO N 03co o m 0
481 co in
T- ino
481 Tt CN03 m
o 03 m m CN T- o O CN CD CN 00 CO o c n m tj- CN in 03
C/5 >- £cd ro z
CD T- TT CD r^ T- 03 g T- O) g CN T- COm cd O CN
TT 1^COCO T- cn m o
N- r-T- CO CO r- m (O
co r-
0?
TOO)TO
03 O cd m o o o CD y - CD o o m m O N- CO CO h- m o N- r- m o 03 00 CN O O co CN o CN N r-
S £ o o o 03 o y - h- T - 03O h- T -
03 O CN CO CO CO CD O h- CN 03co m o CO rrm co o T- 03 CO CN CDCD T - y -
£ o CN (O rtCN 1
CD ^cd m 68 54 0 17 O CN 0 3 0 0
CN CO NO CN CD T-
CN CO COO CO CN TJ-
co o min CN CN o
T - Tj-
087
268
8140
86
O 0 3 O O CN CO OO
O CN CN i n CN 0 3 CN
o c o c o CO m o h -
C0 TO ^CDz1-
03 h- N- CDT - CO g t— CO g cn o m
N- r-03 CO O CO h- cn m o
co cot— CO g CN CD N
CN 0 0
RA
abili
tyra
ting co r- CN CO tT T - CN CO N - r - CN CO T t T- CN CO TT T - CN CO N - T- CN CO N - CN CO T f T - CN CO T f r- (N CO Tf
crop
ma
ng
jom
an
gjo
oilp
jiio
ilpjii
oilp
_hi
oilp
_hi
oilp
joo
ilpjo
oilp
joo
ilpjo
pe
pp
jop
ep
pjo
pe
pp
jop
ep
pjo
pin
ejo
pin
ejo
pin
ejo
pin
ejo
pota
_hi
pota
_hi
po
tajii
pota
_hi
pyre
_lo
pyr
ejo
pyre
_lo
pyr
ejo
rice_
hiric
e_hi
rice_
hiric
e_hi
rubb
_hi
rubb
_hi
rubb
_hi
rubb
_hi
rub
bjo
rub
bjo
rub
bjo
rub
bjo
prov
ince
EN
GE
NG O CD CD O
z z z zLU LU LU LU
O O Ü Üz z z zLU LU LU LU
Ü Ü O Ü z z z zLU LU LU LU
ü ü ü ü z z z zLU LU LU LU
O CD CD CDz z z zLU LU LU LU
O CD CD CDz z z zLU LU LU LU
CD CD CD CDz z z zLU LU LU LU
CD CD CD CDz z z zLU LU U J LU
CD CD CD CDz z z zLU LU U J LU
LUCL
§ 1
CNO 7
.3
M.6 CD
0 0
CS
I
ec
?
0 0
0 0
o o c o c oÖ CD CN CD
O CO N CO O CD CD CD
11
.9
34
.2
38
.7
15
3
3
5
19
0
12
8
54
.9
0 0
37
.9
37
.9
16
0
OLU
> -
“ S § gCD CD
SO O T - CN
CO CDO O Tr- CN
CO CDO N CD (N
N CD CDCO CO N CN CD CD O CD
T f (N O N CN CN T f CD
O CD CD O CO T f CNCO i - p
O ro - 5 z " "
CN o t-h - c o
O T -c o
CO N r -c o CO CO
T f O O T -CN N CO CO
N (D CD CO CO CN T—
0O 00 CO r - h - c o
2
Z>
DC>c o
c oOz
£
03CD
i o t- h - C\J N O (D
T -
O CD O T - O ▼— CO U")
CO T -
o i n t j- t-
o o c o 1 0
CN T f CD T f O CD CD (D
O CO CD T - l f ) O O ) ID
T f CO T -
N T - 0 0 T fcn r - cn h -
CN LO
CN T f ID CD O ( \ i r - IO
T f T f t-
ID CD CO N O CO CD CD T f CD CD T f
CN O T -
O CN CD CD O CD CN
c o
CD CO CO T f T f O ID CD
T f 0 0 CO CO CO CO
0 0 CD CO CD CO CO CD CN O CO T - T - T - CO c o c o
T f r - (N O ) CD T - T f CO CD CD CD 0 0
CD CN -r-
N - CN O N- CO N CD CD
h - CD CN 0 0 0 0 CO
t g>
ca
1
CN CO T f r - (N CO tJ- T - i >4 r ; t j -
O CD CD O O N N CD
CO CO T -
O O (D T -O O O CD O
CD
O CD CD O CO TJ- CNCO 00 c o
Is- c o
CDCN
CD CD CD O ▼“* ▼— CD
T f T f y-
O CN O CO OO O O (D O
CD
CD O N T f CD CD CD ▼- CD CD CN
0 0 0 0 CO
o c d o r*"-CO cd
oCN
o
o o o o 1 1 1 1
ca
rd
jo
ca
rd_
lo
ca
rd_
lo
ca
rd
jo
ca
sh
jo
ca
sh
jo
ca
sh
jo
ca
sh
jo
O O o o 1 1 1 1
cit
rjo
cit
r_lo
cit
rjo
cit
rjo £ £ £ £
1 1 1 1o o o o
1 1 1 1 o o o o<J O O CJo o o o o o o o c
oc
njo
co
cn
jo
co
cn
jo
co
cn
jo £ r £ £ v j
h2
co
f_lo
va
ni
va
m
va
m
va
m
- 5 - 5 - 5
o o o o o o u o o o o o CJ o o o
o o o o O ( J o o
CN CN CN CN i : r r r
CQ CD CD CDz z z zLU LU LU LU
CD CD CD CDz z z z
§ § § §
CD CD CD COz z z z
5 5 5 5 WN
BW
NB
WN
BW
NB
WN
BW
NB
WN
BW
NB
WN
BW
NB
WN
BW
NB CO CG CD CD
z z z z
§ § § §
CD CD CD CDz z z z
§ 5 § 5 WN
BW
NB
WN
BW
NB
WN
B
U JCL> -
>CD
C002
1
O O N- CDO t - CO o
CD
CN CD N CD O CO CD CD
CD T -
O O 0 0 CD O O T f CD
CN T f CO CN CD CN
(D N
CO (D N T - T t CO
CO 0 0 T f CD "*—
O O CNLDCDCD
QO
03CD
O O CD CDo ■»— ■»—
CD
CD T- co •*— O O N CN
CO T f CN
O 1 ^ T - O CD (N
h - CN
3
DC
f f l J ^
0
12
2
88
6
10
83
1 r - o N CD O T f T f CDT f 0 0 O CD ID N CD
CO ro ü “
CD CN CD t- CDCN T f T— CD ▼—
Z
£
£ ?
5 co03
1
CN CO T f T - CN CO T f t- CN CO T f
0 0
7 4
35
.3
33
9
0
0
20
8
48
4
16
0
2
2
1 4
3
1
83
2
0
0
3 6
17
4
78
0
0 0
3
6
17
4
78
0
15
8
9
8
0.0
70
4
15
2
O N ID T f CD T f T-
O CD CD CD T f O CN
CN 00 CO 00 CD CN f - (D
O O CD COCN T f T f
O O CD c oCN T f Tf
CD o o u o O h - CD ID
CD ■»— O CO CO
0 0 CO T f T - ^ CN CO CO ID CD CD
CO ID CD T - CD
T f CO CNT - CD
CO
O •*— h - CN O CO T— CD CN CD CD O O T - 0 0 T - O T - 0 0 T - o r - o CN T fO T f r o (N
T f TfO CD CO O
CO T f CNCN r - c o N
c oO T f tD 0 3 O T f CD CD CD 0 0 O CD
CN CDCOCN
O CD CD CN CD 0 0 CD
O O CN CD CO CO CO
CN CN TP- CN CD N CD T f
O T f (O NCD CD CO
o T f cd r -CD CD CO
CD N O T fCN h - CD §
CN CO N T - CO CO
CN 00 GO CO CO r -
▼- T - CO T f o CO T f o CN N 00CN ID
T— CN CO Tf r - CN CO T f r - (N CO T f (N CO T f — CN CO T f T - CN CO T f
va
nij
o
va
nij
o
va
nij
o
va
nij
o
ca
rd
jo
ca
rd_
lo
ca
rd
jo
ca
rd
jo
ca
sh
jo
ca
sh
jo
ca
sh
jo
ca
sh
jo
ch
iljo
ch
iljo
ch
iljo
ch
il_
lo
cit
rjo
cit
rjo
cit
rjo
cit
rjo
co
co
_h
i
CO
CO
jll
co
co
_h
i
co
co
_h
i o o o o I I I I
o o o o o o u o o o o o o o o o
o o o oI I I I
c c c co u o oo o o oO O <J o h
2c
of_
hi
h2
co
f_h
i
h2
co
f_h
i
h2
co
f_h
i
O O O 0z z z zLU LU LU LU W
HY
WH
Y
WH
Y
WH
Y
WH
Y
WH
Y
WH
Y
WH
Y
WH
Y
WH
Y
WH
Y
WH
Y
WH
Y
WH
Y
WH
Y
WH
Y
WH
Y
WH
Y
WH
Y
WH
Y
WH
Y
WH
Y
WH
Y
WH
Y
WH
Y
WH
Y
WH
Y
WH
Y
WH
Y
WH
Y
WH
Y
WH
Y
O
- Io
CN
NG
S BY
RM
U R
ATI
NG
S BY
MED
. EN
V. T
YPE
R
ATI
NG
S BY
RM
U
RA
TIN
GS
BY M
ED
ENV.
TYP
EED
EN
V.
% a
rea
8.7
0.0
91.1 0.0
16 3
27
.2
54.8
C 91s es9 09 0 0 0.
08.
013
.870
.1 O O C O CO
O O CM 10 C O T- 8
2 14
6
23 6
49
6 0.0
38 2
48.7
10.7 0.0
37.9
37
9
16.0 0.0
16 4
71
.6
10.3 0.0
0.0
42.8
TIN
GS
BY M
! ar
ea
(km
2)
1810 0
1885
7 033
7756
2011
338 0
6330
1106
931
62 016
5628
6014
498 0 0
1703
131
62
1703
3019
4878
1026
3 079
0010
078
2211 0
7839
7849
3320 0
3391
1482
321
27 0 088
55
MU
Rfi
%ar
ea 0.1
8.7
91.2 0.0
16.7
26.1
57.3 0.2
30.2
54
315
.3 0.0
15.6
10.8
73.5 0.0
0.5
84.4
15.1
12.3
18.3
18
7
50.7 0.4
43.1
46.1
10
.4 0.7
41.9
41
.515
.9 O C O T - ^
0 co cd in ■«- co T- 0.
00.
042
.9
STIN
GS
BY R
l ar
ea
(km
2) 2918
0018
867 0
3449
5397
1185
0 4962
5311
237
3157 0
3236
2240
1522
0 010
217
465
3129
2551
3782
3871
1049
2 7489
2795
3521
60 144
8665
8590
3297 0
3475
1409
431
27 0 0
coco
R;>
suita
bilit
yra
ting CM CO T j- T - CM CO r - ( \ J CO ^ r - CM C O T T r - (M C O T f *— O J CO T - CM C O t T r - CM CO t T CM C O T f r - CM C O
crop
h2co
f_lc
h2co
f_lc
h2co
f_lc
rcof
_hrc
of_h
irc
of_h
rcof
_h
rcof
jcrc
of_l
crc
ofjc
rcof
jc
mai
z_h
mai
z_h
mai
z_hi
mai
z_h
man
gjo
man
gjo
man
gjo
man
gjo - C - C s z s z
I I I I Q- Q-0 0 0 0 oi
lpjo
oilp
jooi
lpjo
oilp
jo
pepp
jope
ppjo
pepp
jope
ppjo
pine
jopi
nejo
pine
jopi
nejo
pota
_hi
pota
_hi
pota
_hi
prov
ince
WN
BW
NB
WN
B
WN
BW
NB
WN
BW
NB
WN
BW
NB
WN
BW
NB
WN
BW
NB
WN
BW
NB
WN
BW
NB
WN
BW
NB
WN
BW
NB
WN
BW
NB
WN
BW
NB
WN
BW
NB
WN
BW
NB
WN
BW
NB
WN
BW
NB
WN
BW
NB
WN
BW
NB
WN
B
TIN
GS
BY M
ED.
ENV.
TY
PE
area
%
are
a(k
m2)
2899
32
610
80
12 1
3211
36
1
0 0
044
3 5.
015
56
17 5
5636
63
3
0 00
44
3 5 0
4924
55
328
84
32 4
0 0
0 45
1 5.
177
2 8.
776
74
86.3
00
0
0 0.
066
52
74 8
1481
16
6
257
2 912
8 1.
420
8 2 3
7398
83
2
0 0
038
5 4
313
82
15.5
7045
79
2
0 0
032
0 3.
615
49
17.4
6943
78
0
0 0
0 66
7 7.
537
50
42.1
2959
33
.3
0 0.
096
6 10
922
89
25.7
<5.tr
TOCDTO55
D
35 8
0
0 40
8 0 0
5.7
32 3
62
0 0.0
12.1
40.1
47.8 0 0
5.1
12.1
82
.9 0.0
1.7
76.1
22.1 2 9
1.9
8.2
87 0 O CO N I D
O ^ Oy— CO
O T - CO T -
O T f ( O ( J ) 0.0
14.2
45.1
40.7 0.0
15.5
38
6
TIN
GS
BY R
M
area
(k
m2)
3183 0
3634 0
510
2871
5516 0
1075
3572
4250 0
451
1073
7373 0
154
6774
1969 257
172
726
7742 0
429
1308
7160 0
364
1496
7037 0
1266
4013
3618 0
1378
3438
RA'
1 su
itabi
lity
ratin
g CM C O T T r - C \J C O ^ r - CM C O T t r- C M C O ^ CM C O T - CM CO T J T - CM CO T - CM C O ^ T - CM C O T t T- CM C O
crop
h2co
f_lc
h2co
f_lc
h2co
f_lc
rcof
_hi
rcof
_hi
rcof
_hrc
of_h
O O O O
O O O OO O O O
mai
z_hi
mai
z_hi
mai
z_hi
mai
z_hi
man
gjo
man
gjo
man
gjo
man
gjo
oilp
_hi
oilp
_hi
oilp
_hi
oilp
_hi
oilp
jooi
lpjo
oilp
jooi
lpjo
pepp
_lo
pepp
_lo
pepp
jope
ppjo O O O O
I I I I0) <D 0) (D c c c cQ_ CL CL CL po
ta_h
ipo
ta_h
ipo
ta_h
i
0.E§ W
HY
WH
YW
HY
WH
YW
HY
WH
YW
HY
WH
YW
HY
WH
YW
HY
WH
YW
HY
WH
YW
HY
WH
YW
HY
WH
YW
HY
WH
YW
HY
WH
YW
HY
WH
YW
HY
WH
YW
HY
WH
YW
HY
WH
YW
HY
WH
YW
HY
WH
YW
HY
WH
YW
HY
WH
Y
RAT
ING
S B
Y R
MU
R
ATIN
GS
BY
MED
. EN
V. T
YPE
RAT
ING
S B
Y R
MU
R
ATIN
GS
BY
MED
. EN
V. T
YPE
030303 5
4.2
S 6
8
S O
l
0 0
00
0.0
17
.4
28
.4
48
.8
0.0
22
.4
12
.9
54
.8
0.0
37
.9
38
1
15
.3
£
are
a
(km
2)
11
20
9 0 0
21
78
18
51
8 0
35
98
58
83
10
09
5 0
46
46
26
69
11
33
8 0
78
39
78
78
31
62
%a
rea
57
.1
0.0
0.0
10
.5
89
.5
0.0
26
.3
23
4
50
.3
0.0
29
.8
13
0
57
.3
0.0
44
.4
40
.3
15
.3
are
a
(km
2)
11
82
2 0 0
21
68
18
52
8 0
54
39
48
37
10
42
0 0
61
65
26
81
11
85
0 0
91
90
83
49
31
57
> , o i *— CN CO TT ▼- CN CO TJ- T— CN CO T- CN CO T f
5 'TS .■2 L-
3
py
rejo
py
rejo
py
rejo
py
rejo
rub
bjo
rub
bjo
rub
bjo
rub
bjo
cro
p
5Q. ri
ce
_h
i
ric
e_
hi
ric
e_
hi
ric
e_
hi
rub
b_
hi
rub
b_
hi
rub
b_
hi
rub
b_
hi
O CO m co co co co co co co CO CO CO CO CD CD CO CD
.E> § §§55 § § § § § § § § § § § §
Q.
0.0
37
.9
37
.9
16
0
0.0
2.9
78
.2
8.0
0 8
L 9
8
0 0
0 0
0.0
29
.9
54
.6
13
.1
0.0
52
.2
25
.5
8.0
0 0 ) 0 ) 0 CO TJ- CN
O N ( \ ^ CD O) TT
O O 1 - T fcn n -
O O) CN CD 00 03 CN
O N- CD N-00 CO CO h - CO
CN 04 N 03 r - N O CN CN m r - 0O CO N
N- CN
N 03 in O) O C l N O O CD M- CO TT 0O CD m co N tj-Ö T - <r- LO
r r T f T-O O CN CD Ö O CO CD
COm N co co
T- m cd T f Ö CD^ CO T -
T f i n o NTT CD 03 03
O in CN CN T- CO CO
O O h - CN 03 CO
tT 03 T f CN 03 T - CO CO
CN N CO CNT- CD m c\j
00 00 COo N m— CD ^—
h - m N- CD N- Is-in T -
N r - CO m CN ■*—
V- CN CO Tr T - CN CO N- T - CN CO T t T - CN CO TT T“ CN CO T f
o o o o o o o o o o o o O O O O o o o oI I I I I I 1 1
TD TD TD TD1 1 1 1 — I _ l _ l _ l J J J J
va
r
va
r
va
r
va
r
03 03 CD 03 O O O CJ
( / ) ( / ) C/3 (/)CD CD CD (DO O O O
r r r rO O CJ o 0 ö ö ö
CD CD CD C0 —J _J _J _J _1 _I _I _1 _I _I _I _I _1 _1 _I _I
§ § § §- Z . - Z . - Z . - Z . Z . Z . Z . Z . Z . Z . Z Z . Z . - Z Z . Z .
% a
rea
35
.5 oo 7
.1
42
.6
32
.5
0.0
6.4
25
.7
33
.7
0.0
5.0
17
.5
63
.3
0.0
5.0
55
.3
32
.4
0.0
3.6
17
.4
78
.0
2.2
20
.9
55
.2
16
8 O Tj- CD COO T - X- cd
CO T-
oo 3
.1
69
.5
22
.5
0.0
10
.0
73
.2
16
.8
so 03 00 CN
CN CO 03o in co CN
CD co oO CO CD CD
N- in coO CO N- N-
N- CN 00O O 03 CO
CN N- N-•*- co co T- CD in CN ^
0
86
25
11
o N- tj- in co oo in
° O T - T-
ra | coCD N CO
CO CNin CN o
CN CON- in CD
T - inN- 03 CO
N" CNCO in 03
r - CDT- CN CO O
T - CO T-03 O T- T— CO
N" T—( O ^ O
s03 o in N 03 o T - in tj- o co o O 1 - r - 00 O t- 00 ■<- CN m co o O tJ- CD O o T - 03 03 o h - n - o
CD£
in ö in co o in N"
O CD CO O >r- T f TT
O in CN CN CO CD
O CN O NT t T t
O ^ CD 03 T - r ^
CN CD NCO TT T -
O in N N o in CN T -in Tr
O N O N
40
81 o CD cd in
OO N COo in N in
CO CD 03
0
51
0
28
71
55
16 o in CN o
inO TJ- CD N
CD 03 CO▼“ O O T— CO CO 03 CN
o in cd ^CN N CN
o O CD CD T- CO CN
O T}- N- •r-ID CO CN
« 1T f N CD
Tj- CON- co m T - co co
o in CNT— CO N"
CO TT O T- o oCN CN ■<—
CO CD O co T- in CO CN
h - CN O
t c 5 cS § ^
CN CO N- T - CNJ CO T f ^ (N (O T - CN CO T j
o
o o o o I I I I
J) J) J) J) > , > , > > > > Q. Q. Q. Q.
SZ SZ SZ SZI I I I
0 <D <D <D O O O O
r r r j:I I I I
X I X I X I X I X I X I X I X I 3 3 3 3
O O O O O O O OI I I I _I _I ,_l ,_l I I I I
-Q -Q -Q -Q r— (— f— r— "O "O “O “O^ cd cd cd cd cd cd cd> > > > o o o o
o o o oI I I I
SZ -C JZ -C ( / ) ( / ) ( / ) ( / ) CD CD CD CD O O O O
O O o oI I I I “
o o o o
O O o o
■s ' - s ' i ' b
>-X
> - > - > - > - X X X X
>->■>->■ X X X X
> > > - > - X X X X
> - > > - > - X X X X
> - > > - > - X X X X
£ 5 § § § § § § § § § § § § § § §
1 1 1 1C/3 </) CO CO
1 1 1 1CO CO CO CO
1 1 1 1CO CO CO CO
1 1 1 1CO CO CO CO
RA
TIN
GS
BY
RM
U
RA
TIN
GS
BY
ME
D.
ENV.
TY
PE
R
ATI
NG
S B
Y R
MU
R
ATI
NG
S B
Y M
ED.
ENV.
TY
PE
03<D03
« I
03<D03
a?
re J
03 v—
Q .
O
03<D
03<D
ra J
i * ?S 'ra -2 ^
Q.O
0.0
27.5
33.3
21.7 0.0
50.4
24.8
13.3 o o o r-
O O O CO CD 0.0
50.4
24.8
13.3 o o o r-
o o O 00 CDO CO O O) O 00 O CD CO 0.
026
.614
.259
.2 O O N- o d o in oo 00 0.
026
.614
.259
.2 o o d d
025
6731
0220
27 047
0023
1212
38 0 0 092
07 047
0023
1212
38 0 0 092
07 082
1 083
86 024
8013
2255
27 0 079
91 744 0
2480
1322
5527 o o
12.4
14.4
43
.9
29.3 5.3
48.4
25
.920
.5 5.4
46.5
27
.720
.5
6 86 0 0 V
I 0 0 0.
01.
111
.287
.7 6.4
14.6
50.7
28
.2 9.9
43.5
30.2
16.4 5.3
14.0
15.5
65.3 O O CD
d d ro cci00 T- 23 4
7.
3
1153
1344
4098
2734 494
4514
2413
1908 501
4335
2585
1908 0
100 0
9229 0
100
1045
8184 59
513
6647
3426
34 923
4054
2820
1532 492
1305
1443
6089 0 0
7797
1532
2185 68
5
T- CNJ CO Tt
coco
jo
1co
cojo
2
coco
jo
3co
cojo
4 CM CO ^ r- CN CO Tf r- (N CO ^ T- CN CO r- CM CO ^ CVJ CO Tf" T- (N CO T- CN
coco
_hco
co_h
coco
_hco
co_h
cocn
jcco
cnjc
cocn
jcco
cnjc
h2co
f_h
h2co
f_h
h2co
f_h
h2co
f_hi
h2
cofjo
h2co
f_lo
h2co
f_lo
h2co
f_lo
rcof
_hi
rcof
_hi
rcof
_hi
rcof
_hi o o o o
« J .J .J .Jo o o o u o o o
ma
izjii
mai
z_hi
mai
z_hi
mai
z_hi
ma
ng
jom
an
gjo
ma
ng
jom
an
gjo
oilp
_hi
oilp
jii
__i _i _i _iCO CO CO COZ Z Z Z
_I _I _I _ICO CO CO CO2 Z 2 2
_i _i _i _iCO CO CO CO2 2 2 Z
_i _i _i __iCO CO CO CO2 2 2 2
—i —i __i __iCO CO CO CO2 Z 2 2 N
SL
NS
LN
SL
NS
L —I —I __I __ICO CO CO CO2 2 2 2
__i __i __i __ico co co co2 2 2 2
—i —i __i —ico co co co2 2 2 2 N
SL
NS
L
o o n-O O 00 T-
T- 00 0.0
1.4
31.7
66.2 0.0
1.4
31.7
66.2 ro o o oo
(N O O CM CD 1.3
37.7 0.0
61.1
V99
nz
LI
0 0 0 0
2.7
67 8
19
2 O ^ CN ^ O O T— co
CO
0.0
1.4
81.8
16.8 O h-
o d
0 4010
8149
01
0 8719
0739
87 0 8719
0739
87 136 0 0
5587 76
2268 0
3678 0
165
1305
4000 0
165
4085
1158 0 24 677
5321
0 8649
2510
11
0 40
0 0
0.7
18 0
81
.4 0.0
2.0
28.7
69.2 0.0
2.0
28.7
69.2 CM CD O O
00 T- o O O) 6.2
16.5 0.0
77.3 0.0
2 7
31.3
66
.0 0 0
2 7
58 2
39
.1 0 0
0.4
11.2
88
.4
0ZL
9 LL V
5 0 0 o r--
d o
0 4010
8149
01
012
217
3041
70 012
217
3041
70 491
113 0
5418 37
399
6 046
53 016
518
8439
73 016
535
0423
53 0 24 677
5321
032
546
7610
21
0 40
r- CNJ CO TT r- (M CO ^ T- CN CO Tf r- CM CO t” (N CO ^ T- CN CO TJ- T- CN CO ^ T- CN CO Tf r- CM CO T- CN
coco
_hco
co_h
coco
_hco
co_h
coco
jcco
cojc
coco
jcco
cojc
cocn
jcco
cnjc
cocn
jcco
cnjc
h2co
f_hi
h2co
f_hi
h2co
f_hi
h2co
f_hi
h2co
f_lo
h2
cofjo
h2co
f_lo
h2co
fJo
rcof
_hi
rcof
_hi
rcof
_hi
rcof
_hi o o o o
o o o o o o o o
mai
z_hi
mai
z_hi
mai
z_hi
mai
z_hi
ma
ng
jom
an
gjo
ma
ng
jom
an
gjo
oilp
_hi
oilp
_hi
2 2 2 2 CO CO CO CO
2 2 2 2CO CO CO CO
1 ^ ^ ^ CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO
I ^ ^ ^CO CO CO CO
2 2 2 2CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO
2 2 2 2CO CO CO CO
I I 11CO CO CO CO S
IM SIM
NG
S BY
RM
U
RAT
ING
S B
Y M
ED
ENV.
TYP
E R
ATIN
GS
BY
RM
U
RAT
ING
S BY
MED
. EN
V. T
YPE
2
% a
rea
85
.7 8.0
24
.2
3.3
33
.3
21
.7 0.0
60
.92
3.6
14.4
0.0
5
0 4
2
4.8
1
3.3
0.0
2
9 9
5
8.7
1
0.4
0.0
0
.0
71
.3
20
4 o o co co o ' O CO T-
T- CO 0.0
2
7.5
4
4 0
2
0 2
0.0
2
9 9
3
0.9
2
0.4 O CD CD O
O UO CO GOin T-
are
a(k
m2
)
7991 74
4
22
58
30
93
10
22
02
7 05
67
92
20
21
34
8 04
70
02
31
21
23
8 02
78
95
47
49
66 0 0
66
48
19
05 0 0
15
18
75
89 0
25
70
41
02
1881
02
78
92
88
01
90
5 05
18
61
27
27
44
%a
rea
46.1
23.1 6.6
55
.22
2.6
15
.6
5.3
46
.5
27
.82
0.5 5.8
18
.059
.11
7.2
0.0
0.0
71
.82
8.2
0.0
0
.0
19 4
8
0 6 6.4
1
3.9
5
8 2
2
1.5
0.6
2
8 5
4
2.7
2
8 2 0.6
6
3.2
19
8
16 4 5.3
4
7.8
2
6 5
2
0.5
are
a(k
m2
)
43
05
21
54
61
95
14
52
10
91
45
6
49
44
33
52
59
21
90
8
54
31
67
75
50
91
60
0 0 06
69
52
63
4 0 01
81
47
51
5
59
51
29
95
42
92
00
6 532
65
63
98
62
63
4 535
89
71
84
71
53
2
49
44
45
82
46
91
90
8
™ CO Tt o j m tt C\J CO Tj- T- C\J CO Tj- T— (N CO Tf CM CO Tf T- CM CO r - CNJ CO TT T- CM CO •*- CM CO
CD
1
oil
pjo
oil
pjo
oilp
_lo
oilp
_lo
pin
ejo
pin
ejo
pin
ejo
pin
ejo
py
rejo
py
rejo
py
rejo
py
rejo
rub
bjo
rub
bjo
rub
bjo
rub
bjo
cro
p
o o
pe
pp
jop
ep
pjo
pe
pp
jop
ep
pjo
po
ta_
hi
po
ta_
hi
po
ta_
hi
po
ta_
hi
rice
_h
iri
ce_
hi
rice
_h
iri
ce_
hi
rub
b_
hi
rub
b_
hi
rub
b_
hi
rub
b_
hi o o o o
I I I I c c c cCD CO CO CO> > > >
pro
vin
ce
NS
LN
SL
NS
LN
SL
NS
LN
SL
NS
LN
SL
NS
LN
SL _i _i _i _i
CO CO CO CO Z Z Z Z
_i _i _i _iCO CO CO CO2 2 2 2 N
SL
NS
LN
SL
NS
L _i _i __i _ico co co co2 Z 2 Z
— i — i — i —i CO CO CO CO Z Z 2 Z N
SL
NS
LN
SL
NS
L _i _i __i __iCO CO CO CO2 Z 2 Z
% a
rea
18 0
8
1.4
0.0 1.4
31
.56
6.4 0.0 1.4
31
.7
66
2 0.0
7
.9
69
6
22 5 0.0
2
.5
33 3
3
4.9
0.0
0
.0
72 9
22
.1 0.0
7
.3
28 5
3
7.5 0.0
9
.7
14.7
6
6 4 0.0
1
8.7
5
1.2
19
2 0.0
1.
4 3
1.7
6
6 2
are
a(k
m2
)
1081
4901
087
189
44
00
0 087
19
07
39
87 0
47
34
19
41
35
5 015
02
00
32
10
3 0 04
39
31
33
0 04
39
171
4
22
56 0
58
28
88
40
00 0
112
73
08
211
58 0
8719
07
39
87
%a
rea
18
.08
1.4
0.0
2
.0
28
5
69
5 0.0
2
.0
28
.7
69
2 0.0
5
.7
52 3
4
1.9
0.0
2.5
44
.25
3.4
0.0
3.
1 5
5 3
4
1.5 0.0
5
2 4
0 9
54
0 0.0
9
7 24
4
66
0 0.0
2
6 4
3
4.5
39
.1 0.0
2
.0
28 7
6
9 2
are
a(k
m2
)
1081
490
1 012
21
71
74
18
3 012
21
73
04
17
0 03
46
31
50
25
26 0
150
26
59
32
13 0
188
33
33
2501
03
12
2461
32
49 0
58
21
46
73
97
3 01
58
92
08
02
35
3 012
21
73
04
17
0
>, O) CO ^ t- CNJ CO T f r - CN CO t T - OM CO Tj- T - CN CO T f r - CM CO T f t— CM CO T f T - CM CO T t r - CM CO Tj- r - CM CO ^
CO
1
Pe
PP
jop
ep
pjo
pe
pp
jop
ep
pjo
pin
ejo
pin
ejo
pin
ejo
pin
ejo
py
rejo
py
rejo
py
rejo
py
rejo
va
nij
ov
an
ijo
va
nij
ov
an
ijo
cro
p
d do o o
ilp
joo
ilp
joo
ilp
joo
ilp
jo
po
taji
ip
ota
_h
ip
ota
_h
ip
ota
_h
i
rice
_h
iri
ce_
hi
rice
_h
iri
ce_
hi
rub
b_
hi
rub
b_
hi
rub
b_
hi
rub
b_
hi
rub
bjo
rub
bjo
rub
bjo
rub
bjo
8,E SI
MSI
M ^ ^ ^ ^CO CO CO CO
2 2 2 2 CO CO CO CO
2 2 2 2 CO CO CO CO
I I 1 ICO CO CO CO
2 2 2 2CO CO CO CO
1 I I ICO CO CO CO
I I I ICO CO CO CO
l l l lCO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO
o
RA
TIN
GS
BY
RM
U
RA
TIN
GS
BY
ME
D
EN
V T
YP
E
RA
TIN
GS
BY
RM
U
RA
TIN
GS
BY
MED
. EN
V. T
YP
E
03CU
CD O LO Tj- T— oo LT) in co T- c d 03 TT r- Tf CD N N m CD CM O O CO (7) CO N Tj- oo CD Tf CN CO OO t—CO T™ CD CO
o co T-CD CO
O CO co ^ T— cor- Tf CT) T-
r- TT COT- CD CO D
T- CDO 03 T- CD
r- COT- c d •»- r^’
▼“ CO Tj- CO CM o c\i CD
CO o ^T- oo
area
(km
2)
434
8629
2888
3314
4639
1923
1399
928
3621
1443
99
2435
6096
522
0691
1588
61
8073
6617
122
5242
1439
20
7135
7675
239
968
3186
11
3722
8824
214
2291
2109
95
5770
7735
214
3549
2189
64
1557
813
060
2570
4236
10
1457
651
934
3669
3855
27
%ar
ea 0.1
4.5
61.2
34.1 t T CO N CD
O 0 3 CD COm c o
1.5
18.0
42.4
38.1 2.2
16.9
47.7
33.2 1.9
17.4
14
.3
66 4 1.1
19.7
31.9
47.3 2.3
22.5
28
0
47.3 4.2
0.9
0.1
94.8 CN CD 0 0
s ^ c d o o
Q_
O
r - 03 x r m m co cm T—
CO N" N " CD N CN N i n
CO T— CO CO 03 CNJ r- T-CO N r - Tj- (M O CO N
O 03 T f CM 03 N 03 N
t r - co N m T- i n T-
ID r- N CNo i n 03 oo
^ m CN Tj- h - 00 N O
CD CN i n CN CO CD CD N
CD00
c o co i n O O CD
03 Tf T- O 'T- CM O Tf
O N f ^ N ^ CO O) rt
O CD 00 r -O N c o DJ
m O ) co cdco 03 i n
CM ■<— COi n O CD CD
o T- 03 ° g 00 CD
CN O CD CD 03 r t N"
O O O TT 03 i n 00 CD
03i n
CN 00 COCN *r- r” 'r“ CN T- S m n T - CN T - T - CM
T- co 03
T— CN CO ^ T~ CN CO TT r- CM CO ^ T - CM CO r f T— CN CO T- CM CO N- r - (N CO T f ^ cm co
ca
rdjo
card
_lo
card
_lo
ca
rdjo
ca
sh
joc
as
hjo
cash
_lo
ca
sh
jo
ch
iljo
ch
iljo
chil_
loc
hil
jo
cit
rjo
cit
rjo
cit
rjo
cit
rjo
coco
_h
ico
co_
hi
coco
_h
ico
co_
hi o o o o
I I I I o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o c
oc
njo
co
cn
joc
oc
njo
co
cn
jo
h2
cof_
hi
h2
cof_
hi
h2
cof_
hi
h2
cof_
hi
h2
co
fJo
h2
co
fJo
h2
co
fJo
h2
cof_
lo
t 'o
CD CD O Oz z z zQ. O. Q. 0. _l _l _l _I
CD CD CD CDz z z zCL 0. 0. CL_l _l _I _l
CD CD CD CDz z z z0. 0. 0. CL _l _I _1 _1
CD CD CD CDz z z zQ_ CL 0. CL _i _ j _i _i
CD CD CD CDz z z zCL CL 0. 0. _i _i _i _i
CD CD CD CDz z z zQ. CL CL CL _i _i _l _l
CD CD CD CDz z z zCL CL CL CL _ l _J _J _l
CD CD CD CDz z z zCL CL CL CL _l _l _I _I
CD CD CD CDz z z zCL CL CL CL _j _ j _j _j
CDzo.
< < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < <
0.0
2.
1 81
.1
16 6 0.0
4
6 7
8.5
16
6 1.0
3.6
66
.72
2.8
0 0
4 6
78
.5
16 6
0.0
1
0 0
.0
98
.9 0 0
1.1
9.2
8
9.7
0.0 11
9.2
89
.7
31
.3
17
.8
0.0
3
3 6
31 3
2
5.3
2
.5
25.1 o
ö
02
27
8921
18
23 0
50
98
63
918
23
111
39
87
34
225
11
05
09
86
39
18
23 5
111 4
10
88
6 011
61
01
79
87
3 011
61
01
79
87
3
34
46
19
63 0
36
94
34
46
27
84
27
92
76
5 o
0.0
11
.9
71
.21
6.9
0.0
16 4
6
6.7
16
9 1 0
9.6
5
4.3
35
.1 0 0
17
.9
65
.4
16
.7L 86
6 0 0
1
0 0 0 0
1 1
9 2
89
.8
0 0
1.1
9.2
8
9 8
32
8
5 9
0 8
60
.5
32
.83
0.3
2.7
34
.2 oo
01
31
27
83
41
86
0 01
80
77
33
91
86
0
111
10
57
59
73
38
65 0
19
68
72
03
18
35 5
111 98
10
79
2 011
61
00
89
88
2 011
61
00
89
88
2
36
07
65
0 936
65
6
36
07
33
40
29
23
76
7 o
t- CN CO TT T— CN CO TT T— CN CO T - CN CO r r CN CO t T T— CM CO t “ CN CO ^ r - CN c o T - (N CO T f
card
joca
rdjo
card
joca
rdjo
cash
joca
shjo
cash
joca
shjo
chilj
och
iljo
chilj
och
iljo o O O O
■B -B •■g' -B
coco
_hi
coco
_hi
coco
_hi
coco
_hi o o o o
1 1 1 1 o o o o u u u o o o o oU (J u o co
cnjo
cocn
joco
cnjo
cocn
jo
h2co
f_hi
h2co
f_hi
h2co
f_hi
h2co
f_hi
h2co
fJo
h2co
fJo
h2co
fJo
h2co
f_lo
rcof
_hi
> > - > > - X X X I UJ LU LU UJ
> - > > > - X X X X LU LU LU LU
>- >- >- >- X X X X LU LU LU LU
>- > > > X X X X LU LU LU LU
> - > > - > X X X X LU LU LU LU
> > > > X X X X LU LU LU LU
> > - > - > X X X X LU LU LU UJ
X X X X LU LU LU LU
> > >- > X X X X LU LU LU LU
>-XLU
RA
TIN
GS
BY
RM
U
RA
TIN
GS
BY
ME
D
EN
V.
TYP
E
RA
TIN
GS
BY
RM
U
RA
TIN
GS
BY
MED
. EN
V. T
YP
EE
D.
EN
V.
' %
are
a
13.1
16.5
66
.6 0.7
14
6
44
.4
36
.2 CO CO CD oo o co m n
•<— r -
0.5
3
.5
60
.4
32 5 7.6
1
5.7
18
0
55
6 1.7
18 0
4
4 4
3
2.8
0.7
18
6
31.1
4
7.0 1.1
15 7
47
.73
2.7
0.1
1.9
35
.05
9.3
0.0
0.3
23
.5
AT
ING
S B
Y M
E a
rea
(k
m2
)
60
00
47
59
04
30
53
72
31
35
67
08
32
03
46
51
66
12
6
35
22
17
59
97
14
01
35
66
03
21
82
16
05
82
76
95
21
49
18
2
34
97
27
18
55
82
66
42
55
02
3
77
83
82
57
22
03
46
91
50
37
3
30
25
85
28
81
42
80
02
15
42
1
52
35
72
12
52
18
65
01
50
00
7
24
28
65
51
60
39
7
27
21
58 0
15
25
10
76
11
V/IU
R
%a
rea
16
.62
0.8
61
.3 1.8
18
.94
0.2
39.1 1.3
4.9
17
4
76
.4 0.9
8.8
56
.73
3.6
4.2
6.4
23
.66
5.7
2.1
20
.3
40
.23
7.4 1.3
18 4
2
8.5
5
1.8 1.7
19
.34
2.5
36
.5
0.1
1.8
41
.057
.1 0.0
0.9
20
.4
AT
ING
S B
Y R
f a
rea
(k
m2
)
75
99
39
54
83
28
11
73
82
52
86
64
91
84
54
51
79
18
9
60
84
22
41
47
96
31
35
05
06
39
53
40
44
92
60
17
41
54
05
9
19
41
92
95
73
10
82
19
30
14
24
96
62
93
12
61
84
24
61
71
60
1
58
27
84
31
31
30
76
62
37
72
9
80
05
88
45
21
94
99
31
67
18
5
26
68
33
01
88
06
62
61
97
3 04
08
893
61
1
t rCNJ CO tJ- T- CN CO Tf r - (N CO N- T- CN CO Tf T- CN CO Tt T- CN CO tT T- CN CO N" T- (N CO Tf — CN CO Tf T - CN CO
5 ToCT3 v—
1
rco
fjo
rco
fjo
rco
fjo
rco
fjo
ma
ng
jom
an
gjo
ma
ng
jom
an
gjo
oil
pjo
oil
pjo
oil
pjo
oil
pjo
pe
pp
jop
ep
pjo
pe
pp
jop
ep
pjo
pin
ejo
pin
ejo
pin
ejo
pin
ejo
cro
p
rco
f_h
rco
f_h
rco
f_h
ma
iz_
hm
aiz
_h
im
aiz
_h
im
aiz
_h d r r r
I I I I _Q._Q.jQ._Q.5 5 o o p
ota
_h
ip
ota
_h
ip
ota
_h
ip
ota
_h
i
pyr
e_
lop
yre
jop
yre
jo
u.Eo
CD CD CD 2 2 2 CL CL CL _J _J _ l
CD (D CD CD 2 2 2 2 CL CL CL CL __I __I __I __1
CD CD CD CD 2 2 2 2 CL a CL CL __I _I __I __I
CD CD CD CD 2 2 2 2 CL CL CL CL _I _I _I _I
CD CD CD CD 2 2 2 2 CL CL CL CL__l _l __1 __l
CD CD CD CD 2 2 2 2 CL CL CL CL —1 _I —1 _1
CD CD CD CD 2 2 2 2 CL CL CL CL — I —I — I — I
CD CD CD CD 2 2 2 2 CL CL CL CL__l _ l __i __I
CD CD CD CD 2 2 2 2 CL CL CL CL __1 __1 __1 __1
CD CD CD 2 2 2 CL CL CL __l _l __l
Q
LU
< < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < <
> = LU TO
1.1
28
.4
54
.8 0.0 1.1
49
.93
3.3 2
11.
4
1.4
95.1 O CD UO CD
O ^ CO ID
6 86
0 0 l
l
0 0 0.0 1.1
9.2
89
.7
0.0 1.0
9.3
89
.7 1.0
3.6
66
.7
22
.8 2.1
1.7
58
9
37
.3
0.0
0.0
71
.6
Q o5UJ2> -
m g ™ 00 £ E O2 w
12
0
312
1
60
33 0
12
0
54
90
36
64
23
31
58
14
9
10
46
6 05
09
86
39
18
23 0
11
6 4
10
88
6 0
11
6
10
17
98
73 0
111
10
22
98
73
111
39
87
34
2
25
11
23
3
191
64
79
41
03 0 0
78
85
U R
fi%
area 1.
9
30
.66
7.5
0.0 1.9
48
.14
9.9 2
1
1.5
7.5
89
.0
0.0
16 4
66
.7
16 9
L 86
6 0 l
l
0 0 0.0 1.1
9.2
89
.8
0.0 1.0
9.2
89
.8 1.0
9.6
54
.53
4.9
2.1
5.3
47
.7
45
.0
0.0 2.6
63
.6
TIN
GS
BY
RM
ar
ea
(km
2)
21
4
33
65
74
27 0
21
4
52
95
54
97
22
6
16
2
82
7
97
91
■ 01
80
7
73
39
18
60 0
11
69
81
07
92 0
11
6
10
08
98
82 0
111
10
13
98
82
111
10
57
59
98
38
40
22
65
82
52
46
49
52 0
281
69
99
&? g 5 CN CO TJ- T - CN CO Tj- T- CN CO r f T- CN CO Tf r - CN CO ^ t— CM CO N" T- CN CO N* CN CO Tf ^ CN CO N- T- CN CO
5 - - STO1
o o o o
o o o o o u o o
ma
ng
jom
an
gjo
ma
ng
jom
an
gjo
oilp
joo
ilpjo
oilp
joo
ilpjo
pe
pp
jop
ep
pjo
pe
pp
jop
ep
pjo
cro
p
rcof
_hrc
of_
hi
rco
f_h
i
mai
z_hi
mai
z_hi
mai
z_hi
mai
z_hi
oilp
_hi
oilp
_hi
oilp
_hi
oilp
_hi
pin
ejo
pin
ejo
pin
ejo
pin
ejo
pota
_hi
pota
_hi
pota
_hi
pota
_hi
pyr
ejo
pyr
ejo
pyr
ejo
o,E>
> >- > X X X LU HI LU
> - > > - > X X X X LU LU LU LU
> > - > - > - X X X X LU LU LU LU
> > > - > - X X X X LU LU LU LU
> - > > > - X X X X LU LU LU LU
> > > > X X X X LU LU LU LU
>- >- >- > X X X X LU LU LU LU
> - > - > > - X X X X LU LU LU LU
> > >- >- X X X X LU LU LU LU E
HY
EH
YE
HY
RA
TIN
GS
BY
RM
U
RA
TIN
GS
BY
MED
. E
NV
. TY
PE
R
ATI
NG
S B
Y R
MU
R
ATI
NG
S B
Y M
ED
. E
NV
. TY
PE
82TO r--
oo n co n r - d (D N
T“ CO N "
^ O) (No cx> T— in
T- T- CD
CO CM 0 0 CD
d cd o mT - CO T f
area
(km
2) inCOCDCD
CD
COCO 17
016 CM CO
Is- CO CD Is- h - CD
581
3906
134
646
3886
7
581
3604
903
3232
504
3722
3810
7M
350
1074
1
CO X- CN CN ■*- 'r- T- CN
03CDto
h -CO
h -CN
CM
39.0
47.2
0.2
24.2
14.3
61.3
0.2
26.6
34.1
39.1 1.4
19.4
31.5
47
.8
£
S g CDCO
1226
851
140
1788
1421
6413
N r- CD 00 CN T- m co O N ^ TfCN io o m lO CD N N CO CD CD Tfro | oCDCO
cd co m co o m T- T- CD co T- CN
00 O N- CO CN CD CD CN in N(N CD CM T— CD CO N- CD 00 Tf r- T- CN
> CD N- CN CO 'T X— CN CO N- r- CN CO T— CN CO N-
s öS -2 -
crop
pyre
_lo
rice_
hiric
e_hi
rice_
hiric
e_hi
rubb
_hi
rubb
_hi
rubb
_hi
rubb
_hi
rub
bjo
rub
bjo
rub
bjo
rubb
_lo o o o o
1 1 1 1 c c c cCO 03 03 03> > > >
CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CDoC 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 28
Q. Q_ Q- CL CL _J _J _J _J CL d Q. d_J —l —1 -J Q_ Q_ CL 0._J _J _J _J CL CL CL a. _1 _1 _1 _1Q. < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < <
% a
rea
21.9 0.0
5.8
61.4
32.5 0.0
1.1
28 4
54
.8 oo 1.
149
.933
.3 oo 1.
1 9
2 89
.7
in in tt oo N- co in N O O «1- coCN CN CO o O O N- CN CD CD o 0 N COro J S
CD N m CD CO ^ co § ■«r- Tj- CDm co T- O CO T- CD
030) CD O r- co m O CD CD m o CD T- CD o r- CN COCO d ° ^ ^ O r- o N o T- m Q o t- CD CT>TO
CDCN m O CD CM O N" m h- y— CD CN o rf in NT- CD CD o CD 00 CN T- O COro i . CO ^ co m y— IO N" CN CO TT CO h- CN CN Tfm m T- o coy~“ CD
CO
1
_o
g 1>
r r r r I I I I8 8 8 S
■C C -C ■=
x: _cz -C _cz I I I I
£ £ £ £ £ D £ £ 13 13 3 3
O O O OI I I I
£ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ 13 13 13 13
o o o o_I __I __I __Ic c c cca ca ca co> > > >
> > >- >- X X X X LU LU LU LU
> >- >- >- X X X X LÜ LU LU LU
> > - > > - X X X X LU LÜ LU LÜ
> >- > >- X X X X LU LU LU LU
MAP 1: Major environment typesPapua New Guinea
. r -
X v --------------V
y% \Environment type
■ mangrove swamps estuaries and coastal plains
■ beach ridges and plains raised coral reefs recent alluvial plains relict alluvial plains alluvial flood plains
H swamps alluvial fansvolcanic plains and fans
■ volcanic plateaux and cones■ steeplands - karst
I hillsSi mountains
provincial boundaries
J
/<;,_______
MAP 2: Suitability of environment subtypesfor low input
Arabica Coffee productionHarding model
■ high moderate marginal not suitable
----- provincial boundaries
<r
V . I
%
MAP 3: Suitability of environment subtypesfor high input
Arabica Coffee productionHarding model
<*3
<r
highmoderate marginal not suitable
----- provincial boundaries
%»V
MAP 4: Suitability of PNGRIS RMU’sfor low input
Arabica Coffee productionHarding model
£
<r
■ high moderate marginal not suitable
------provincial boundaries
%
MAP 5: Suitability of PNGRIS RMU'sfor high input
Arabica Coffee productionHarding model
<r
8 high moderate marginal not suitable
------provincial boundaries
a
\a
<5 ^
MAP 6: Suitability of PNGRIS RMU's for Oilpalm production
moderate marginal not suitable
-------provincial boundaries
PNGRIS PUBLICATIONS (ISSN 1320-5765)
Agricultural Laud Use o f Papua New Guinea: [map with explanatory notes]. Scale 1:1 000 000. PNGRIS Publication No. 1. ISBN 0 642 19604 4
Forest Resources o f Papua New Guinea: [map with explanatory notes]. Scale 1:1 000 000. PNGRIS Publication No. 2. ISBN 0 642 19603 6
Land Resource Survey, Upper Ramu Catchment, Papua New Guinea. PNGRIS Publication No. 3. ISBN 0 642 19605 2
Land Suitability for Selected Crops in Papua New Guinea. PNGRIS Publication No. 8. ISBN 0 642 19609 5
Rainfall Erosivity in Papua New Guinea. PNGRIS Publication No. 9. ISBN 0 642 19607 9
RELATED PUBLICATIONS
Geomorphology o f Papua New Guinea: [map with explanatory notes]. Scale 1:1 000 000. Land Research Series No. 33. (CSIRO Division of Land Use Research). ISBN 0 643 00092 5
Vegetation o f Papua New Guinea: [map with explanatory> notes]. Scale 1:1 000 000. Land Research Series No. 35. (CSIRO Division of Land Use Research). ISBN 0 643 00138 7
Papua New Guinea Inventory o f Natural Resources, Population Distribution and Land Use Handbook. Natural Resource Series No. 6 (CSIRO Division of Water and Land Resources).
ISSN 1320-5765 ISBN 0 642 19609 5